Estimating the dependence of mixed sensitive response types in randomized response technique

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 894-910 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amanda MY Chu ◽  
Mike KP So ◽  
Thomas WC Chan ◽  
Agnes Tiwari

Sensitive questions are often involved in healthcare or medical survey research. Much empirical evidence has shown that the randomized response technique is useful for the collection of truthful responses. However, few studies have discussed methods to estimate the dependence of sensitive responses of multiple types. This study aims to fill that gap by considering a method based on moment estimation and without using the joint distribution of the responses. In addition to the construction of a covariance matrix for the multiple sensitive questions despite incomplete information due to the randomized response technique design, we can calculate the conditional mean of continuous sensitive responses given as categorical responses and partial correlations among continuous sensitive responses. We conduct a simulation experiment to study the bias and variance of the moment estimator with various sample sizes. We apply the proposed method in a healthcare study of the dependence structure among the responses of a survey concerning health and pressure on college students.

1980 ◽  
Vol 73 (8) ◽  
pp. 618-627
Author(s):  
William L. Curlette

Some surprising activities and some of the mathematics behind a comparatively new survey method, the randomized response technique.


1980 ◽  
Vol 47 (3) ◽  
pp. 743-750 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guy Bégin ◽  
Michel Boivin

1266 students participated in an interview on sensitive issues. Three very sensitive hypothetical situations were assessed by means of three methods, the direct questionnaire, the randomized-response technique, and a “most people” projective-form questionnaire. The data indicate that the first two methods yielded similar proportions of endorsement. However, the projective method yielded much higher proportions of endorsement. These data indicate that the former two methods seem to assess the same concept which is quite different from the one measured through the projective questionnaire. Since the randomized-response method assures the subjects of the confidentiality of their responses, the authors believe that the direct questionnaire and randomized-response data are closer to reality, that is, more valid.


2011 ◽  
Vol 53 (3) ◽  
pp. 703-718 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lucio Barabesi ◽  
Sara Franceschi ◽  
Marzia Marcheselli

2012 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 77-85 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne Jansen ◽  
Cornelius J. König ◽  
Eveline H. Stadelmann ◽  
Martin Kleinmann

This study contributes to the literature on self-presentation by comparing recruiters’ expectations about applicants’ self-presentational behaviors in personnel selection settings to applicants’ actual use of these behaviors. Recruiters (N = 51) rated the perceived appropriateness of 24 self-presentational behaviors. In addition, the prevalence of these behaviors was separately assessed in two subsamples of applicants (N1 = 416 and N2 = 88) with the randomized response technique. In line with the script concept, the results revealed that recruiters similarly evaluated the appropriateness of specific self-presentational behaviors and that applicants’ general use of these behaviors corresponded to recruiters’ shared expectations. The findings indicate that applicants who use strategic self-presentational behaviors may just be trying to fulfill situational requirements.


2014 ◽  
Vol 521 ◽  
pp. 245-251
Author(s):  
Kai Xu ◽  
Xiao Yu Ding ◽  
Hong Wei Chen ◽  
Quan Yuan Jiang ◽  
Ke Sun ◽  
...  

With the number of power transmission and transformation projects increasing, it needs to consider more indices information and utilize more comprehensive evaluation methods in the decision-making of building schemes. As a consequence, a comprehensive evaluation indices system, including the indices of network security, economy, environmental friendliness, adaptation and coordination of the power transmission and transformation engineering system, is firstly built to evaluation construction schemes. Then this paper proposes a multi-attribute comprehensive evaluation method for power transmission and transformation projects. In this method, the optimal combination weighting method based on the moment estimation is adopted to weight for every index. It can overcome the weakness of the subjective weighting methods and the objective methods. After that, the optimal scheme is obtained by the grey correlation-cosine prioritizing evaluation method, which can take into account the distance and angle information of schemes. Finally, the example shows this method can fully consider overall information of each index, having good operability.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mursala Khan

Abstract The results of Sample surveys play a vital role in decision making. One of the main issues being faced by survey statisticians during the collection of survey data is the problem of non-response which may affect survey cost and accuracy of estimates. The problem of non-response becomes more severe if the survey contains sensitive questions like related to family planning methods, use of drugs. To diminish the non-response rate arising in the case of direct questioning (DQ) technique, Warner (1965) proposed an indirect survey technique known as the randomized response (RR) technique. He addressed this problem for a cross-sectional data. This method is a well-known procedure that produces more valid responses on sensitive questions in surveys. The method avoids the direct link between respondent’s response and the sensitive question through the help of a randomization device. Thereby protecting respondent’s privacy which in turn greatly increases survey response rate. However, due to the complex nature of panel estimator, the work is missing the in the context of RR technique. To cover this gap, we propose a linear regression model in the context of panel surveys/longitudinal studies under the application of the RR technique. We solve all these issues through simulation study.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document