A Comparative in vitro Investigation of the Frictional Resistance produced by Active Self-Ligating Brackets, Passive Self-Ligating Brackets and Low Friction Ligatures

2013 ◽  
Vol 47 (4_suppl3) ◽  
pp. 366-370
Author(s):  
Gaurav Gupta ◽  
Anju Loomba
2007 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 390-397 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Tecco ◽  
D. Di Iorio ◽  
G. Cordasco ◽  
I. Verrocchi ◽  
F. Festa

2016 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 19-23
Author(s):  
Amol Mhatre ◽  
VK Ravindranath ◽  
Sachin Doshi ◽  
Girish Karandikar ◽  
PS Vivek

ABSTRACT Aim The aim of this in vitro study was to investigate the efficiency of the new generation of elastomeric ligatures with innovative designs (SlideTM and AlastiKTM Easy-to-Tie) in reducing frictional resistance (FR) during sliding mechanics as compared with conventional ligatures. Materials and Methods Sixty ligature samples divided into four groups were used for the study. Group A: QuiK-StiK™ (3M Unitek, Monrovia, CA, USA), Group B: AlastiK™ Easy-to-Tie (3M Unitek, Monrovia, CA, USA), Group C: Slide™ (Leone, Firenze, Italy), and Group D: SS ligatures 0.010” (Libral Traders, New Delhi, India). Universal Testing Machine, Instron was used for measuring FR at the bracket-wire interface. Results There was statistically significant difference in FR among all the four groups of ligatures tested (p < 0.001). Slide ligatures produced the least amount of FR followed by SS ligatures, Easy-to-Tie, and QuiK-StiK in the increasing order of the FR values registered. Conclusion SlideTM ligatures may represent a valid alternative to passive self-ligating brackets when minimal amount of friction is desired. Angulation introduced into the elastomeric ligatures reduces the friction in comparison to conventional elastomeric ligatures. How to cite this article Vivek PS, Ravindranath VK, Karandikar G, Doshi S, Mhatre A, Sonawane M. Frictional Characteristics of the Newer Low-friction Elastomeric Ligatures. J Contemp Dent 2016;6(1):19-23.


2008 ◽  
Vol 35 (S 01) ◽  
Author(s):  
H Leske ◽  
A Baiker ◽  
C Schichor ◽  
J.C Tonn ◽  
R Goldbrunner ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 22-28 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vinit Singh ◽  
Swati Acharya ◽  
Satyabrata Patnaik ◽  
Smruti Bhusan Nanda

Introduction: During sliding mechanics, frictional resistance is an important counterforce to orthodontic tooth movement; whichmust be controlled to allow application of light continuous forces.Objective: To investigate static and kinetic frictional resistance between three orthodontic brackets: ceramic, self-ligating, andstainless steel, and three 0.019×0.025” archwires: stainless steel, nickel-titanium, titanium-molybdenum.Materials & Method: The in vitro study compared the effects of stainless steel, nickel-titanium, and beta-titanium archwires onfrictional forces of three orthodontic bracket systems: ceramic, self-ligating, and stainless steel brackets. All brackets had 0.022”slots, and the wires were 0.019×0.025”. Friction was evaluated in a simulated half-arch fixed appliance on a testing machine. Thestatic and kinetic friction data were analyzed with 1-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and post-hoc Duncan multiple rangetest.Result: Self-ligating (Damon) brackets generated significantly lower static and kinetic frictional forces than stainless steel (Gemini)and ceramic brackets (Clarity). Among the archwire materials, Beta-titanium showed the maximum amount of frictional forceand stainless steel archwires had the lowest frictional force.Conclusion: The static and kinetic frictional force for stainless steel bracket was lowest in every combination of wire.


2010 ◽  
Vol 51 (8) ◽  
pp. 4151 ◽  
Author(s):  
Henri Sueke ◽  
Stephen B. Kaye ◽  
Timothy Neal ◽  
Amanda Hall ◽  
Stephen Tuft ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (12) ◽  
pp. 2718-2728
Author(s):  
Elsayed M. Abdel Bary ◽  
Ammar N. Harmal ◽  
Mona E. Ibrahim ◽  
Moustafa A. Gouda

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document