scholarly journals Experience of a Mental Health Expert in a General Hospital Setting

1999 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 52-56
Author(s):  
K.M.J. Mamboodiri
BJPsych Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (S1) ◽  
pp. S309-S310
Author(s):  
Salah Ateem ◽  
Rachael Cullivan

AimsBenzodiazepines and Z-drugs are used frequently in acute psychiatric wards, however long-term administration can result in undesirable consequences. Guidelines recommend prescription of the lowest effective dose for the shortest period and if possible to prescribe “as required” rather than regularly. The 25-beded inpatient unit at Cavan General Hospital admits adult patients requiring acute care from the counties of Cavan and Monaghan. Admissions are accepted from four community mental health teams, two psychiatry of old age teams and the rehabilitation and mental health of intellectual disability teams. In order to evaluate the potential to improve our practice of prescribing benzodiazepine and Z-drugs, it was decided to evaluate current use.MethodThe NICE guidelines were consulted, and we retrospectively reviewed the use of these agents from mid-January to the end of May 2020. Demographic variables included age, gender, and county. Patients were stratified into three groups, the benzodiazepine group, the Z-drugs group, and the combined benzodiazepine and Z-drugs group. In each group therapeutic variables were recorded including the medication type, dose, frequency, prescriber, and duration of treatment. Other variables included psychiatric diagnoses, length of inpatient admission, status on admission, and recommendations on dischargeResultThere were 101admissions during that period, and 74 of them were prescribed these agents (n = 74; 73.3%). Fifty one (n = 51; 68.9%) received benzodiazepines only, twenty-three (n = 23; 31.1%) were prescribed Z-drugs, and twelve (n = 12; 16.2%) received both benzodiazepines and Z-drugs. Forty two patients (n = 42; 56.8%) were commenced on hypnotics in the APU, 23 patients (n = 23; 31.1%) already received hypnotics from the CMHTs, and the rest were prescribed by both. Thirty two patients (n = 32; 43.2%) were discharged on hypnotics. Patients admitted involuntarily and female patients had longer admissions (mean of 16.62 ± 3.26 days and 16.16 ± 2.89 days respectively). Schizophrenia and BPAD were the commonest diagnoses.ConclusionIt appears that large amounts of these agents are used in the Acute Hospital Setting which is not overly surprising given the severity of illness and clinical indications however improved awareness could still lead to more appropriate and hopefully reduced use. We therefore recommend:A formal audit including appropriate interventions i.e., educate staff and patients, highlight guidelines, and review subsequent practice.Train staff in safer prescribing practices including prn rather than regular use if appropriate.Regularly review discharge prescriptions indicating recommended duration of use.


Author(s):  
Pawan Gupta

It is estimated that 1 in 4 people in a year will have some kind of mental health problem, and that mixed anxiety and depression is the most common disorder in the UK. There is an increasing number of mental health patients attending the ED, and a new FY doctor in the ED will encounter such patients from their first shift onwards. The approach to a mental health patient is only marginally different from the approach to those presenting under other specialties. The assessment largely depends on careful history taking and attentively listening to the patient’s narrative. There are only a few situations in psychiatry in which a physical examination and investigations are required in the ED to make a diagnosis. As it would not be possible to cover all the areas of psychiatry which come through the doors of the ED in one chapter, only a few questions have been included here to provide a flavour of the common psychiatric situations that FY1/2s may come across in their early training period. The UK has the highest rate of self-harm in Europe and so one of the most important points is to recognize suicidal patients who can harm themselves seriously and manage them appropriately. If such patients are discharged following an inadequate assessment, they may go on to commit suicide and the attending doctors would have missed the opportunity to support and save them. In this category of patients, when they present to the ED, no matter how minimal is the level of their self-mutilation, it is a serious ‘cry’ for help. Our job is to listen to the patient and support them with the maximum help we can provide. As it may be difficult to occasionally get to the bottom of the problem, particularly within the time constraints in the ED, a low level of suspicion should be kept to ask for the assistance of the mental health expert. Self-harm and depression go almost hand in hand. The suicidal rate is higher in depressed patients than in the general population.


2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (9-10) ◽  
pp. 358-367
Author(s):  
Brett Scholz ◽  
Chris Platania‐Phung ◽  
Sarah Gordon ◽  
Pete Ellis ◽  
Cath Roper ◽  
...  

1974 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-16 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bernard R. Shochet

A substantial number of patients admitted to the medical and surgical services of the general hospital experience significant and obvious psychological difficulties associated with their acute illness. This is more likely to be recognized overtly on a medical than on a surgical service; on both, a significant number of patients need psychological services during their acute illness and convalescence. The mental health counselor serves an important function on the medical and surgical units: screening new admissions and identifying those patients in need of psychosocial services, providing supportive psychotherapy to selected patients and consulting with the nursing staff and house staff concerning day to day management. By participating in walking rounds with the medical staff, the counselor is also able to facilitate the request and use of formal psychiatric consultative services. As demonstrated through statistics and case reports, the mental health counselor, trained to operate in the general hospital setting, makes a valuable contribution in the care of medical and surgical patients in the general hospital.


2021 ◽  
pp. 002076402110230
Author(s):  
Lidija Injac Stevović ◽  
Selman Repišti ◽  
Tamara Radojičić ◽  
Norman Sartorius ◽  
Sonila Tomori ◽  
...  

Background: Non-pharmacological treatment for schizophrenia includes educational, psychotherapeutic, social, and physical interventions. Despite growing importance of these interventions in the holistic treatment of individuals with schizophrenia, very little is known about their availability in South-East European countries (SEE). Objective: To explore mental health care experts’ opinions of the availability of non-pharmacological treatment for people with schizophrenia in SEE. Methods: An online survey containing 11 questions was completed by one mental health expert from each of the following SEE countries: Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina (B&H), Bulgaria, Croatia, Greece, Kosovo†, Montenegro, Moldova, North Macedonia, Romania, Serbia, and Slovenia. Data were collected on estimated rates of received non-pharmacological interventions, type of services delivering these interventions, and expert views of availability barriers. Results: In eight countries, the estimated percentage of people with schizophrenia who receive non-pharmacological treatments was below 35%. The primary explanations for the low availability of non-pharmacological treatments were: lack of human and financial resources, lack of training for clinicians, and pharmacotherapy dominance in the treatment for schizophrenia. Conclusion: Lack of personal and institutional resources and state support were identified as primary obstacles to staff training and delivering non-pharmacological treatments to people with schizophrenia on individual and systemic levels, respectively. This evidence can be used to improve holistic, evidence-based treatment for schizophrenia in the SEE countries.


1977 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 201-227 ◽  
Author(s):  
Norman G. Poythress

In spite of the increasing utilization of mental health professionals as expert witnesses in the courts, neither the mental health professions nor the legal profession finds the present state of affairs concerning expert testimony to be satisfactory. This paper extensively reviews the literature which points to problems with both the mental health and the legal personnel who play major roles in mental health litigation. Also reviewed are the various proposals for change that have been suggested to date.


2012 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 259-271 ◽  
Author(s):  
John F. Edens ◽  
Shannon Toney Smith ◽  
Melissa S. Magyar ◽  
Kacy Mullen ◽  
Amy Pitta ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document