A collaborative approach to improve the assessment of physical health in adult consumers with schizophrenia in Queensland mental health services

2015 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 55-61 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sally Plever ◽  
Irene McCarthy ◽  
Melissa Anzolin ◽  
Brett Emmerson ◽  
Mohsina Khatun
BJPsych Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph Butler ◽  
Simone de Cassan ◽  
Margaret Glogowska ◽  
Thomas R. Fanshawe ◽  
Phil Turner ◽  
...  

Background Physical health outcomes in severe mental illness are worse than in the general population. Routine physical health check completion in this group is poor. Aims To quantitatively and qualitatively evaluate the impact of point of care (POC) blood testing on physical health check completion in community mental health services. Method In a prospective cohort design, we equipped an early intervention service (EIS) and a community mental health team (CMHT) with a POC blood testing device for 6 months. We compared rates of blood test and full physical health check completion in the intervention teams with a matched EIS and CMHT, historically and during the intervention. We explored attitudes to POC testing using thematic analysis of semi-structured interviews with patients and clinicians. Results Although the CMHT scarcely used the POC device and saw no change in outcomes, direct comparison of testing rates in the intervention period showed increased physical health check completion in the EIS with the device (rate ratio RR = 5.18; 95% CI 2.54–12.44; P < 0.001) compared with usual care. The rate was consistent with the EIS's increasing rate of testing over time (RR = 0.45; 95% 0.09–2.08; P = 0.32). Similar trends were seen in blood test completion. POC testing was acceptable to patients but clinicians reported usability, provision and impact on the therapeutic relationship as barriers to uptake. Conclusions POC testing was beneficial and acceptable to patients and may increase physical health check uptake. Further research, accounting for clinician barriers, is needed to evaluate its clinical and cost-effectiveness.


2018 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 256-267 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard Clancy ◽  
Terry J. Lewin ◽  
Jenny A. Bowman ◽  
Brian J. Kelly ◽  
Antony D. Mullen ◽  
...  

BMJ Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (6) ◽  
pp. e035379
Author(s):  
Cathrin Rohleder ◽  
Yun Ju Christine Song ◽  
Jacob J Crouse ◽  
Tracey A Davenport ◽  
Frank Iorfino ◽  
...  

IntroductionMental disorders are a leading cause of long-term disability worldwide. Much of the burden of mental ill-health is mediated by early onset, comorbidities with physical health conditions and chronicity of the illnesses. This study aims to track the early period of mental disorders among young people presenting to Australian mental health services to facilitate more streamlined transdiagnostic processes, highly personalised and measurement-based care, secondary prevention and enhanced long-term outcomes.Methods and analysisRecruitment to this large-scale, multisite, prospective, transdiagnostic, longitudinal clinical cohort study (‘Youth Mental Health Tracker’) will be offered to all young people between the ages of 12 and 30 years presenting to participating services with proficiency in English and no history of intellectual disability. Young people will be tracked over 3 years with standardised assessments at baseline and 3, 6, 12, 24 and 36 months. Assessments will include self-report and clinician-administered measures, covering five key domains including: (1) social and occupational function; (2) self-harm, suicidal thoughts and behaviour; (3) alcohol or other substance misuse; (4) physical health; and (5) illness type, clinical stage and trajectory. Data collection will be facilitated by the use of health information technology. The data will be used to: (1) determine prospectively the course of multidimensional functional outcomes, based on the differential impact of demographics, medication, psychological interventions and other key potentially modifiable moderator variables and (2) map pathophysiological mechanisms and clinical illness trajectories to determine transition rates of young people to more severe illness forms.Ethics and disseminationThe study has been reviewed and approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee of the Sydney Local Health District (2019/ETH00469). All data will be non-identifiable, and research findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals and scientific conference presentations.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Destry L. East ◽  
Ryan P. Peirson

The current structure of our mental health parity laws are a combination of multiple bills at the national and state levels which have been passed since the original Mental Health Parity and Addiction Act of 2008 (MHPAEA). With the MHPAEA only employer-provided insurance programs that covered 50 or more employees and covered mental health services were required to have parity between mental health and physical health coverage. With the passage of the Affordable Care Act in 2010 and its essential benefit mandate (which required the coverage of mental health services) the MHPAEA broadened its reach to include smaller health plans and some Medicaid plans. Reforms in Medicare, CHIP and Tricare also have included parity between mental health and physical health coverage. Despite these changes there is still work needed in regards to state parity laws and better access to care. This review contains 5 figures, and 25 references. Key Words: Parity, Mental Health, Access, Coverage, MHPA, MHPAEA, NQTL, Essential Health Benefits


2016 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. 377-384 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brenda Happell ◽  
Stephanie B. Ewart ◽  
Chris Platania-Phung ◽  
Julia Bocking ◽  
Kathleen Griffiths ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document