scholarly journals “What Is Right for Me, Is Not Necessarily Right for You”: The Endogenous Factors Influencing Nonparticipation in Medical Assistance in Dying

2021 ◽  
pp. 104973232110088
Author(s):  
Janine Brown ◽  
Donna Goodridge ◽  
Lilian Thorpe ◽  
Alexander Crizzle
Keyword(s):  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Nurse Practitioners ◽  
Emotional Labor ◽  
Emotional Impact ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Medical Assistance ◽  
Endogenous Factors ◽  
Medical Assistance In Dying ◽  
Professional Experiences ◽  
The Social

Access to medical assistance in dying (MAID) is influenced by legislation, health care providers (HCPs), the number of patient requests, and the patients’ locations. This research explored the factors that influenced HCPs’ nonparticipation in formal MAID processes and their needs to support this emerging practice area. Using an interpretive description methodology, we interviewed 17 physicians and 18 nurse practitioners who identified as non-participators in formal MAID processes. Nonparticipation was influenced by their (a) previous personal and professional experiences, (b) comfort with death, (c) conceptualization of duty, (d) preferred end-of-life care approaches, (e) faith or spirituality beliefs, (f) self-accountability, (g) consideration of emotional labor, and (h) future emotional impact. They identified a need for clear care pathways and safe passage. Two separate yet overlapping concepts were identified, conscientious objection to and nonparticipation in MAID, and we discussed options to support the social contract of care between HCPs and patients.

Medical Assistance in Dying: A Review of Canadian Regulatory Documents

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 56-59
Author(s):  
Michael J. Villeneuve
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Nurse Practitioners ◽  
Professional Associations ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Ethical Practice ◽  
Medical Assistance ◽  
Medical Assistance In Dying ◽  
Regulatory Documents

After years of heated debate about the issue, medical assistance in dying (MAiD) was legalized in Canada in 2016. Canada became the first jurisdiction where MAiD may be delivered by nurse practitioners as well as physicians. Experience has revealed significant public demand for the service, and Canadians expect nurses to advocate for safe, high-quality, ethical practice in this new area of care. Pesut et al. offer a superb analysis of the related Canadian nursing regulatory documents and the challenges in creating a harmonized approach that arise in a federation where the Criminal Code is a federal entity and the regulation of health care providers and delivery of care fall under provincial and territorial legislation. Organizations like the Canadian Nurses Association contribute to the development of good legislation by working with partners to present evidence to help legislators consider impacts on public health, health care, and providers. Nursing regulators across Canada responded quickly to the unfolding policy landscape as the federal legislation evolved and will face that task again: In February 2020, the federal government tabled legislation to relax conditions related to MAiD requests that will force regulators and professional associations back to public advocacy and legislative tables. The success of the cautious approach exercised by nursing bodies throughout this journey should continue to reassure Canadians that their high trust in the profession is well placed.

Medical Assistance in Dying: Patients', Families', and Health Care Providers' Perspectives on Access and Care Delivery

2020 ◽  
Vol 23 (11) ◽  
pp. 1468-1477 ◽  
Author(s):  
Janine Brown ◽  
Donna Goodridge ◽  
Averi Harrison ◽  
Jordan Kemp ◽  
Lilian Thorpe ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Care Delivery ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Medical Assistance ◽  
Medical Assistance In Dying ◽  
Dying Patients

scholarly journals IMPLEMENTATION OF MEDICAL ASSISTANCE IN DYING (MAID): SCOPING HEALTH CARE PROVIDERS’ PERSPECTIVES

2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. 586-587
Author(s):  
J. Fujioka ◽  
C. Klinger ◽  
R.M. Mirza ◽  
M. Sahar ◽  
A. Dillman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Medical Assistance ◽  
Medical Assistance In Dying

scholarly journals Barriers and facilitators to medical assistance in dying (MAID) discussions in primary care

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
Daphne Young
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Nurse Practitioners ◽  
Research Question ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Barriers And Facilitators ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Medical Assistance ◽  
Medical Assistance In Dying ◽  
Interpersonal Factors

In Canada, medical assistance in dying (MAiD) is an end of life intervention intended to offer increased control to Canadians within the dying process (Brassfield & Buchbinder, 2020). Despite the legalization of MAiD in 2016 and developments in MAiD research, many primary care providers (PCPs) reported feeling reluctant to discuss MAiD with their patients (Otte, Jung, Elger, & Bally, 2017). In Canada, PCPs are typically medical doctors (MDs) or nurse practitioners (NPs) who care for patients in outpatient, non-acute care settings (Statistics Canada, 2019). As limited research has been synthesized on barriers and facilitators of MAiD discussions within the Canadian primary care context, the purpose of this integrative literature review (ILR) was to assess what factors promoted and prevented PCPs from discussing MAiD with their patients. After identifying a research question and related keywords, six databases were searched to identify relevant studies. The initial search yielded 1,874 results, which underwent inclusion and exclusion criteria and resulted in 12 references being included in the review. After collating the data, evaluating it, and summarizing the results, facilitators and barriers that affected the discussion of MAiD between PCPs and patients were divided into intrinsic and interpersonal factors. Intrinsic factors included PCP emotions, values, beliefs, education, and training, while interpersonal factors included communication, relationship, and administrative burdens (Brooks, 2019; Brassfield & Buchbinder, 2020; Selby & Bean, 2019; Kelly & Varghese, 2006; Pasman, Willems, & Onwuteaka-Philipsen, 2013; Hagens, Onwuteaka-Philipsen, & Pasman, 2017). Based on the findings of this review, strategies to promote MAiD discussions between PCPs and patients were outlined. Recommendations included identifying and addressing values, beliefs, and emotions; developing communication skills and strategies; promoting patientii provider relationships; and mitigating administrative burdens (Kelly & Varghese, 2006; Selby & Bean, 2019; Pasman et al., 2013; Brooks, 2019). As MAiD-related research in Canada progresses through its pioneering phase, future research has been suggested to support the development of communication guides specific to MAiD as well as the evaluation of PCP approaches to MAiD discussions within the Canadian primary care setting (Selby & Bean, 2019; Brooks, 2019).

Barriers to Access: A Feminist Analysis of Medically Assisted Dying and the Experience of Marginalized Groups

2019 ◽  
pp. 003022281987377
Author(s):  
Tina Sikka
Keyword(s):  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Implicit Bias ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Institutional Research ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Medical Assistance ◽  
Patient Centered ◽  
Medical Assistance In Dying ◽  
Marginalized Groups ◽  
Barriers To Access

In this article, I argue that a holistic strategy is needed to ascertain how implicit bias, on the part of health-care providers, and structural impediments work together to produce significant barriers to access to medical assistance in dying for marginalized groups—particularly those experiencing intersecting or interlocking forms of identity-based oppressions. In doing so, I also make the case that this kind of primary, patient-centered, and institutional research could benefit from the insights of critical feminism and materialist feminist theory by highlighting and challenging inequalities, opening up debate, and exploring new forms of knowledge production. It also offers a way to shape future research of medical assistance in dying, as it relates specifically to the study of how overlapping forms of structural and interpersonal marginalization (e.g., implicit bias), inclusive of race, gender, class, ethnicity, dis/ability, sexuality, and so on are expressed and experienced.

scholarly journals Implementation of Medical Assistance in Dying: A Scoping Review of Health Care Providers' Perspectives

2018 ◽  
Vol 55 (6) ◽  
pp. 1564-1576.e9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jamie K. Fujioka ◽  
Raza M. Mirza ◽  
P. Lynn McDonald ◽  
Christopher A. Klinger
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Scoping Review ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Medical Assistance ◽  
Medical Assistance In Dying

Nurse Practitioner Challenges to the Orthodox Structure of Health Care Delivery: Regulation and Restraints on Trade

1985 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 195-225
Author(s):  
Karla Kelly
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Health Care Delivery ◽  
Nurse Practitioners ◽  
Nurse Practitioner ◽  
Allied Health ◽  
Care Delivery ◽  
The United States ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Allied Health Care

AbstractUntil recently, physicians have been the primary health care providers in the United States. In response to the rising health care costs and public demand of the past decade, allied health care providers have challenged this orthodox structure of health care delivery. Among these allied health care providers are nurse practitioners, who have attempted to expand traditional roles of the registered nurse.This article focuses on the legal issues raised by several major obstacles to the expansion of nurse practitioner services: licensing restrictions, third party reimbursement policies, and denial of access to medical facilities and physician back-up services. The successful judicial challenges to discriminatory practices against other allied health care providers will be explored as a solution to the nurse practitioners’ dilemma.

scholarly journals Is Video Laryngoscopy the Optimal Tool for Successful Intubation in a Neonatal Simulation Setting? A Single-Center Experience

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (01) ◽  
pp. e5-e10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Iram Musharaf ◽  
Sibasis Daspal ◽  
John Shatzer
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Success Rate ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Nurse Practitioners ◽  
Clinical Training ◽  
Video Laryngoscopy ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Group 3 ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Group 1

Abstract Background Endotracheal intubation is a skill required for resuscitation. Due to various reasons, intubation opportunities are decreasing for health care providers. Objective To compare the success rate of video laryngoscopy (VL) and direct laryngoscopy (DL) for interprofessional neonatal intubation skills in a simulated setting. Methods This was a prospective nonrandomized simulation crossover trial. Twenty-six participants were divided into three groups based on their frequency of intubation. Group 1 included pediatric residents; group 2 respiratory therapists and transport nurses; and group 3 neonatal nurse practitioners and physicians working in neonatology. We compared intubation success rate, intubation time, and laryngoscope preference. Results Success rates were 100% for both DL and VL in groups 1 and 2, and 88.9% for DL and 100% for VL in group 3. Median intubation times for DL and VL were 22 seconds (interquartile range [IQR] 14.3–22.8 seconds) and 12.5 seconds (IQR 10.3–38.8 seconds) in group 1 (p = 0.779); 17 seconds (IQR 8–21 seconds) and 12 seconds (IQR 9–16.5 seconds) in group 2 (p = 0.476); and 11 seconds (IQR 7.5–15.5 seconds) and 15 seconds (IQR 11.5–36 seconds) in group 3 (p = 0.024). Conclusion We conclude that novice providers tend to perform better with VL, while more experienced providers perform better with DL. In this era of decreased clinical training opportunities, VL may serve as a useful tool to teach residents and other novice health care providers.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document