A Retrospective Chart Review of Transfusion Practices in the Palliative Care Unit Setting

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (3) ◽  
pp. 185-190 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giovanna Sirianni ◽  
Giulia Perri ◽  
Jeannie Callum ◽  
Sandra Gardner ◽  
Anna Berall ◽  
...  

Background: There remains limited data in the literature on the frequency, clinical utility and effectiveness of transfusions in palliative care, with no randomized controlled trials or clinical practice guidelines on this topic. There are no routinely accepted practices in place for the appropriate transfusion of blood products in this setting. Aim: The aim of this study was to retrospectively review all transfusions in the palliative care units of 2, tertiary care hospitals in Canada. The goals were to elucidate the frequency, indications, patient characteristics, and practices around this intervention. Design: Descriptive, retrospective chart review. Setting/Participants: The clinical charts of patients admitted to the palliative care unit and who obtained blood transfusions for the period of April 1, 2015, to March 31, 2017, were reviewed. All patients admitted who obtained a transfusion were included. There were no exclusion criteria. Results: Transfusions in the palliative care units were rare despite their availability (0.9% at Sunnybrook and 1.4% Baycrest) and were primarily given to patients with cancer. The main symptom issues identified for transfusion were fatigue and dyspnea. The majority of patients endorsed symptomatic benefit with minimal adverse reactions though pre- and post-transfusion assessment practices varied greatly between institutions. Conclusions: Transfusions in the palliative care units were infrequent, symptom targeted, and well tolerated, though the lack of standardized pre/post assessment tools limits any ability to draw conclusions about utility. Patients would benefit from additional research in this area and the development of clinical practice guidelines for transfusions in palliative care.

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vera Hagemann ◽  
Claudia Bausewein ◽  
Constanze Rémi

AbstractObjectiveOff-label drug use seems to be integral to palliative care pharmacotherapy. Balancing potential risks and benefits in the context of limited therapeutic options is challenging. To provide specific support for clinicians in dealing with off-label use, it is essential to understand off-label use in everyday clinical practice.The aim of this pilot study was to quantify and describe off-label use in a palliative care unit.MethodsRetrospective chart review of all adult patients treated on a palliative care unit in 10/2017. All data on drug use e.g. indication, dose, route of administration were extracted and matched with the prescribing information. Identified off-label use was subsequently compared with recommendations in the relevant literature. The main outcome measure was frequency and type of off-label drug use.Results2,352 drug application days (d) and 93 drugs were identified for 28 patients. Of all drugs, 47 (51%) were used off-label at least once. Most off-label uses concerned indication (57%), followed by mode of administration. In drugs highly relevant to palliative care the rate of off-label use was as high as 67%. The extent to which off-label therapy was supported by literature was very variable and ranged from 0 to 88%.ConclusionsThis single-unit data confirms the high prevalence of off-label use in palliative medicine and demonstrates that off-label use in palliative care is very multifaceted. The data presented allows for a more precise characterization of various aspects of off-label use in order to derive concrete further measures for research and clinical practice.What is already known on this subjectOff-label drug use is likely to be common in palliative care, but detailed data is very limitedOff-label drug use is a potential threat for patient safetyPhysicians state to make therapeutic decisions based on their own experience, due to a lack of available evidence and lack of support in assessmentWhat this study addsoff-label use in palliative care is multifacetedthe mode of administration (e.g. combination with other drugs in a syringe driver) is beside indication a common reasons for off label usethe proportion of off-label use without sound evidence is high.


Author(s):  
Constance M. Dahlin

The National Consensus Project for Quality Palliative Care’s Clinical Practice Guidelines for Quality Care is a significant resource that offers the nurse a framework for quality care in all settings. The Clinical Practice Guidelines are appropriate to a range of populations from neonates to children to adults and older adults; a range of chronic progressive and serious life-threatening illnesses, injuries, and trauma; and a range of vulnerable and underresourced populations. The Clinical Practice Guidelines are appropriate for any setting because they facilitate partnerships for caring for patients with debilitating and life-limiting illnesses and offer support for the nurse in delivering the care, particularly for long-term patients.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document