Screw Fixation Compared to H-Locking Plate Fixation for First Metatarsocuneiform Arthrodesis: A Biomechanical Study

2005 ◽  
Vol 26 (11) ◽  
pp. 984-989 ◽  
Author(s):  
David A. Cohen ◽  
Brent G. Parks ◽  
Lew C. Schon
Keyword(s):  
Locking Plate ◽  
Mechanical Design ◽  
Screw Fixation ◽  
Plate Fixation ◽  
Biomechanical Study ◽  
Maximal Load ◽  
Load To Failure ◽  
Fresh Frozen ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Eden Prairie

Background: Several different techniques have been used for fixation of first metatarsocuneiform (MTC) joint arthrodesis, a standard treatment for arthritis, instability, and deformity of the MTC joint. Improved plating systems using locking designs are now available, but no studies have yet compared this construct with other methods. We compared load to failure with a locking plate design versus standard crossed-screw fixation. Methods: Ten matched pairs of fresh frozen cadaver feet were used. The bone density of each pair was measured with DEXA scanning. One foot of each pair was randomly assigned to have a dorsomedial Normed H titanium locking plate (Normed Medizin-Technik Vertriebs-GmbH, D-78501 Tuttlingen, Germany) applied to the first MTC joint. On the other foot of the pair, fixation of the first MTC joint was done with crossed ACE DePuy 4.0 (DePuy/Ace, Warsaw, IN) titanium cannulated screws. The first metatarsal and first cuneiform were then isolated and planted in an epoxy resin. The specimens were loaded to failure in a four-point bending configuration using a MTS Mini Bionix test frame (MTS Systems Corp., Eden Prairie, MN). Failure was defined as displacement of more than 3 mm at the arthrodesis site. The Student t-test was used to determine any observed differences, with significance set at p ≤ 0.05. Results: The mean maximal load to failure was 140.08 N (SD ± 77.1) for screw fixation alone and 58.09 N (SD ± 11.86) for the H-locking plate. This difference was statistically significant ( p = 0.008). The mean stiffness of the construct for screw fixation alone was 83.10 N/mm (SD ± 49.8) and 19.96 N/mm for the H-locking plate. This difference also was statistically significant ( p = 0. 004). Conclusion: Screw fixation for first MTC arthrodesis created a stronger and stiffer construct than did the H-locking plate. This was likely due to the mechanical design of the implants. Compression across the MTC joint could be applied with the screws, but the plate relied on a fixed angle design with no compression.

A biomechanical study comparing plate fixation using unicortical and bicortical screws in transverse metacarpal fracture models subjected to cyclic loading

2011 ◽  
Vol 37 (5) ◽  
pp. 396-401 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Afshar ◽  
T. S. Fong ◽  
M. Hadi Latifi ◽  
S. R. Kanthan ◽  
T. Kamarul
Keyword(s):  
Cyclic Loading ◽  
Static Loading ◽  
Screw Fixation ◽  
Plate Fixation ◽  
Biomechanical Study ◽  
Metacarpal Fracture ◽  
Three Point Bending ◽  
Load To Failure ◽  
Fracture Models ◽  
The Mean

The use of bicortical screws to fix metacarpal fractures has been suggested to provide no added biomechanical advantage over unicortical screw fixation. However, this was only demonstrated in static loading regimes, which may not be representative of biological conditions. The present study was done to determine whether similar outcomes are obtained when cyclic loading is applied. Transverse midshaft osteotomies were created in 20 metacarpals harvested from three cadavers. Fractures were stabilised using 2.0 mm mini fragment plates fixed with either bicortical or unicortical screw fixation. These fixations were tested to failure with a three-point bending cyclic loading protocol using an electromechanical microtester and a 1 kN load cell. The mean load to failure was 370 N (SD 116) for unicortical fixation and 450 N (SD 135) for bicortical fixation. Significant differences between these two constructs were observed. A biomechanical advantage was found when using bicortical screws in metacarpal fracture plating.

scholarly journals A Biomechanical Comparison of Screw and Plate Fixations for Scaphoid Fractures

2017 ◽  
Vol 07 (01) ◽  
pp. 077-080 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paulo Castañeda ◽  
Patricia Drace ◽  
Scott Edwards ◽  
Jill Goodwin
Keyword(s):  
Locking Plate ◽  
Screw Fixation ◽  
Plate Fixation ◽  
Biomechanical Testing ◽  
Osteoporotic Bone ◽  
Segmental Defect ◽  
Normal Density ◽  
Compression Screw ◽  
Scaphoid Fractures ◽  
Load To Failure

Background Headless screw fixation is the current gold standard of surgical repair for scaphoid fractures. However, maintaining reduction of certain types of scaphoid fractures is challenging with a compression screw. Plate fixation may offer superior fixation in some scaphoid fractures, particularly those with comminution, nonunion, segmental bony defects, and osteopenic or osteoporotic bone. Purpose This study questions whether method of fixation is a determinant in load to failure in segmental scaphoid fractures, and whether any fixation provides a greater mechanical advantage in simulated normal versus osteoporotic bone. Materials and Methods Polyurethane models were fashioned to simulate scaphoids with 3-mm segmental defects. Defects were bridged by one of three constructs: a locking plate, a nonlocking plate, or a headless compression screw. Three models for each fixation construct were tested for both simulated normal and osteoporotic bone density. Load to failure was recorded as the load at which the 3-mm segmental defect was closed. Results Gap closure occurred in all trials. In simulated normal bone, there were no statistically significant differences in load to failure between fixation methods. In simulated osteoporotic bone, the locking plate had a 28% greater load to failure as compared with screw fixation. Conclusion While biomechanical testing shows that plate and screw fixations are equivalent in normal density bone for fixation of a segmental scaphoid defect, locking plates are superior to screw fixation in simulated osteoporotic bone models. Clinical Relevance Plate fixation may provide superior fixation for complex scaphoid fractures, particularly in osteopenic bone.

scholarly journals A Comparison of Plate Versus Screw Fixation for Segmental Scaphoid Fractures: A Biomechanical Study

Hand ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 203-208 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jill A. Goodwin ◽  
Paulo Castañeda ◽  
Ryan P. Shelhamer ◽  
Liam C. Bosch ◽  
Scott G. Edwards
Keyword(s):  
Locking Plate ◽  
Screw Fixation ◽  
Plate Fixation ◽  
Matched Pair ◽  
Segmental Defect ◽  
Volar Locking Plate ◽  
Locking Plate Fixation ◽  
Scaphoid Fractures ◽  
Gap Closure ◽  
Load To Failure

Background: Volar locking plate fixation may offer several advantages over headless screw fixation for scaphoid nonunion, or segmental or comminuted fractures: (1) increased surface area for bony healing; (2) preserved vascularity; and (3) maintenance of a gap for graft insertion. The purpose of this study is to compare headless screw and locking plate fixation of segmental scaphoid fractures and to determine whether either fixation provides a greater mechanical advantage in osteoporotic versus nonosteoporotic bone. Methods: Sixteen matched-pair cadaver scaphoids were dissected from a range of osteoporotic and nonosteoporotic specimens. Scaphoids from each matched pair were randomly assigned to either volar locking plate or compression screw fixation. A 3-mm segment of bone was circumferentially excised from each scaphoid waist to simulate a segmental defect. Implants were applied, and each specimen was then loaded in axial compression. Load to failure was defined as the load required to achieve gap closure. Mechanism of failure, load to failure, and percent gap recovery were recorded for each trial. Results: Gap closure occurred in all trials. Difference in load to failure was not statistically significant between plate and screw fixation in either nonosteoporotic or osteoporotic cadaver specimens. However, percent gap recovery was significantly higher for plate fixation than for screw fixation. Conclusions: In scaphoid fractures with segmental defect, plate and screw fixation demonstrate similar loads to failure, but plate fixation performs superiorly to screw fixation for gap recovery after an applied load to failure.

scholarly journals Interference Screw Versus Suture Anchors for Femoral Fixation in Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction: A Biomechanical Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 232596712198928
Author(s):  
Heath P. Gould ◽  
Nicholas R. Delaney ◽  
Brent G. Parks ◽  
Roshan T. Melvani ◽  
Richard Y. Hinton
Keyword(s):  
Medial Patellofemoral Ligament ◽  
Interference Screw ◽  
Biomechanical Study ◽  
Graft Fixation ◽  
Mpfl Reconstruction ◽  
Suture Anchors ◽  
Femoral Fixation ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Load To Failure ◽  
The Mean

Background: Femoral-sided graft fixation in medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction is commonly performed using an interference screw (IS). However, the IS method is associated with several clinical disadvantages that may be ameliorated by the use of suture anchors (SAs) for femoral fixation. Purpose: To compare the load to failure and stiffness of SAs versus an IS for the femoral fixation of a semitendinosus autograft in MPFL reconstruction. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Based on a priori power analysis, a total of 6 matched pairs of cadaveric knees were included. Specimens in each pair were randomly assigned to receive either SA or IS fixation. After an appropriate reconstruction procedure, the looped end of the MPFL graft was pulled laterally at a rate of 6 mm/s until construct failure. The best-fit slope of the load-displacement curve was then used to calculate the stiffness (N/mm) in a post hoc fashion. A paired t test was used to compare the mean load to failure and the mean stiffness between groups. Results: No significant difference in load to failure was observed between the IS and the SA fixation groups (294.0 ± 61.1 vs 250.0 ± 55.9; P = .352), although the mean stiffness was significantly higher in IS specimens (34.5 ± 9.6 vs 14.7 ± 1.2; P = .004). All IS reconstructions failed by graft pullout from the femoral tunnel, whereas 5 of the 6 SA reconstructions failed by anchor pullout. Conclusion: In this biomechanical study using a cadaveric model of MPFL reconstruction, SA femoral fixation was not significantly different from IS fixation in terms of load to failure. The mean load-to-failure values for both reconstruction techniques were greater than the literature-reported values for the native MPFL. Clinical Relevance: These results suggest that SAs are a biomechanically viable alternative for femoral-sided graft fixation in MPFL reconstruction.

scholarly journals Biomechanical Evaluation of Tarsometatarsal Fusion Comparing Crossing Lag Screws and Lag Screw With Locking Plate

2021 ◽  
pp. 107110072110335
Author(s):  
Sarah Ettinger ◽  
Lisa-Christin Hemmersbach ◽  
Michael Schwarze ◽  
Christina Stukenborg-Colsman ◽  
Daiwei Yao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Locking Plate ◽  
Screw Fixation ◽  
Operative Procedure ◽  
Fixation Technique ◽  
Lag Screw ◽  
Group 15 ◽  
Fresh Frozen ◽  
Biomechanical Evaluation ◽  
The Stability ◽  
End Stage

Background: Tarsometatarsal (TMT) arthrodesis is a common operative procedure for end-stage arthritis of the TMT joints. To date, there is no consensus on the best fixation technique for TMT arthrodesis and which joints should be included. Methods: Thirty fresh-frozen feet were divided into one group (15 feet) in which TMT joints I-III were fused with a lag screw and locking plate and a second group (15 feet) in which TMT joints I-III were fused with 2 crossing lag screws. The arthrodesis was performed stepwise with evaluation of mobility between the metatarsal and cuneiform bones after every application or removal of a lag screw or locking plate. Results: Isolated lag-screw arthrodesis of the TMT I-III joints led to significantly increased stability in every joint ( P < .05). Additional application of a locking plate caused further stability in every TMT joint ( P < .05). An additional crossed lag screw did not significantly increase rigidity of the TMT II and III joints ( P > .05). An IM screw did not influence the stability of the fused TMT joints. For TMT III arthrodesis, lag-screw and locking plate constructs were superior to crossed lag-screw fixation ( P < .05). TMT I fusion does not support stability after TMT II and III arthrodesis. Conclusion: Each fixation technique provided sufficient stabilization of the TMT joints. Use of a lag screw plus locking plate might be superior to crossed screw fixation. An additional TMT I and/or III arthrodesis did not increase stability of an isolated TMT II arthrodesis. Clinical Relevance: We report the first biomechanical evaluation of TMT I-III arthrodesis. Our results may help surgeons to choose among osteosynthesis techniques and which joints to include in performing arthrodesis of TMT I-III joints.

The Peroneal Groove Deepening Procedure: A Biomechanical Study of Pressure Reduction

2005 ◽  
Vol 26 (6) ◽  
pp. 442-448 ◽  
Author(s):  
Craig I. Title ◽  
Hung-Geun Jung ◽  
Brent G. Parks ◽  
Lew C. Schon
Keyword(s):  
Biomechanical Study ◽  
Posterior Tibial Tendon ◽  
Peroneal Tendon ◽  
Foot And Ankle ◽  
Calcaneofibular Ligament ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Mean Pressure ◽  
Fresh Frozen ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Pressure Changes

Background: The goal of this study was to identify pressure changes throughout the peroneal groove after a groove deepening procedure. We hypothesized that pressures would decrease. Methods: Twelve fresh-frozen foot and ankle specimens were used. A thin pressure strip containing four sensor pads was secured within the peroneal groove with pads 1 through 4 positioned at the calcaneofibular ligament (CFL) and at the distal, middle, and proximal groove, respectively. The midstance phase of gait was simulated with loads applied to the plantar foot and posterior tibial tendon and to the peroneus longus and brevis tendons. Pressures were recorded with the ankle in neutral, plantarflexion, dorsiflexion, inversion, and eversion. Groove deepening was done by osteotomizing the posterior fibular wall. Pressure readings were then recorded. Average pressures for each of the four sensor pads after the procedure were compared to those obtained before the procedure. Results: The mean pressure overlying the CFL increased at all five ankle positions; however, these changes were not significant. Significant decreases in pressure were noted within the distal and middle groove at all ankle positions after the peroneal groove deepening procedure. Pressure within the proximal groove increased at all but one position, with a significant difference noted in neutral and plantarflexion. Conclusion: Pressures within the middle and distal peroneal groove significantly decreased after a groove deepening procedure. Combining this technique with peroneal tendon debridement may be advantageous for treatment of partial peroneal tendon tears or recalcitrant peroneal tendinitis.

scholarly journals Supplementary medial locking plate fixation of Ludloff osteotomy versus sole lag screw fixation: A biomechanical evaluation

2017 ◽  
Vol 47 ◽  
pp. 66-72
Author(s):  
Panagiotis E. Chatzistergos ◽  
George C. Karaoglanis ◽  
Stavros K. Kourkoulis ◽  
Minos Tyllianakis ◽  
Emmanouil D. Stamatis
Keyword(s):  
Locking Plate ◽  
Screw Fixation ◽  
Plate Fixation ◽  
Locking Plate Fixation ◽  
Lag Screw ◽  
Biomechanical Evaluation

Comparison of Two Fixation Methods of Oblique Lesser Metatarsal Osteotomies: A Biomechanical Study

1995 ◽  
Vol 16 (7) ◽  
pp. 437-439 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark P. Slovenkai ◽  
Daniel Linehan ◽  
Linda McGrady ◽  
Tae-Hong Lim ◽  
Gerald F. Harris ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Internal Fixation ◽  
Screw Fixation ◽  
Material Testing ◽  
Biomechanical Study ◽  
Testing System ◽  
Human Cadaver ◽  
Kirschner Wires ◽  
Fixation Methods ◽  
Single Screw ◽  
Fresh Frozen

Two methods of internal fixation of oblique lesser metatarsal osteotomies were compared biomechanically using fresh-frozen human cadaver bones. Osteotomies were made obliquely through the metatarsal shafts and fixed with either crossed Kirschner wires or a single AO screw using the lag technique. The specimens were then fixed at their proximal end and loaded to failure using an axial torsion material testing system (MTS, Minneapolis, MN). Load displacement curves were obtained and the stiffness of the constructs was determined. Single-screw fixation was found to be significantly stiffer than the crossed wire configuration ( P < .01). Single-screw fixation resulted in a stiffness of 211.2 ± 111.7 N/cm (mean ± SD), while stiffness of the crossed wire configuration averaged 56.9 ± 25.1 N/cm.

scholarly journals Biomechanical Analysis of the Efficacy of Locking Plates during Cyclic Loading in Metacarpal Fractures

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefanie Doht ◽  
Rainer H. Meffert ◽  
Michael J. Raschke ◽  
Torsten Blunk ◽  
Sabine Ochman
Keyword(s):  
Cyclic Loading ◽  
Locking Plate ◽  
Screw Fixation ◽  
Maximum Load ◽  
Biomechanical Analysis ◽  
Locking Plates ◽  
Functional Rehabilitation ◽  
Metacarpal Bones ◽  
Load To Failure ◽  
Bicortical Screw

Purpose.To analyse the biomechanical characteristics of locking plates under cyclic loading compared to a nonlocking plate in a diaphyseal metacarpal fracture.Methods.Oblique diaphyseal shaft fractures in porcine metacarpal bones were created in a biomechanical fracture model. An anatomical reduction and stabilization with a nonlocking and a comparable locking plate in mono- or bicortical screw fixation followed. Under cyclic loading, the displacement, and in subsequent load-to-failure tests, the maximum load and stiffness were measured.Results.For the monocortical screw fixation of the locking plate, a similar displacement, maximum load, and stiffness could be demonstrated compared to the bicortical screw fixation of the nonlocking plate.Conclusions.Locking plates in monocortical configuration may function as a useful alternative to the currently common treatment with bicortical fixations. Thereby, irritation of the flexor tendons would be avoided without compromising the stability, thus enabling the necessary early functional rehabilitation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document