Outcomes After Interpositional Arthroplasty of the First Metatarsophalangeal Joint

2017 ◽  
Vol 38 (5) ◽  
pp. 514-518 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael C. Aynardi ◽  
Lara Atwater ◽  
Eric J. Dein ◽  
Talal Zahoor ◽  
Lew C. Schon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Case Series ◽  
Metatarsophalangeal Joint ◽  
Hallux Rigidus ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
First Metatarsophalangeal Joint ◽  
Interpositional Arthroplasty ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Functional Scores

Background: For patients with hallux rigidus seeking a motion-sparing procedure, interposition arthroplasty is an alternative to fusion. The purpose of this study was to report patient outcomes after interpositional arthroplasty for hallux rigidus. Methods: All patients undergoing interpositional arthroplasty at our institution from 2001 to 2014 were identified and a retrospective chart review was performed. Follow-up was conducted through a telephone survey to obtain survivorship, satisfaction, and functional scores. Survivorship of the interpositional arthroplasty procedure was defined as no subsequent surgery on the hallux after the index procedure. Patients were excluded for incomplete records. Complications were recorded. From 2001 to 2014, 183 patients were identified. Of these, 14 were excluded for incomplete data, leaving 169 patients. Of these, 133 had an average follow-up of 62.2 months (range, 24.3 months to 151.2 months). Results: The overall failure rate was 3.8% (5/133). Patient-reported outcome was rated as excellent in 65.4% (87/133) or good in 24.1% (32/133) of patients and fair or poor in 10.5% (14/133) of patients. Of 133 patients, 101 (76%) were able to return to fashionable or regular footwear. The infection rate was 1.5% (2/133). Patient-reported cock-up deformity of the first metatarsophalangeal joint (MTPJ) occurred in 4.5% (6/133) of patients. In addition, 17.3% (23/133) of patients reported metatarsalgia of the second or third MTPJ at the time of final follow-up, and there was no significant difference between interposition types ( P = .441). Conclusion: Interpositional arthroplasty for hallux rigidus was found to have excellent or good results in most patients at a mean follow-up of 62.2 months. Level of Evidence: Level IV, retrospective case series.

Long-term Follow-up of Cheilectomy for Treatment of Hallux Rigidus

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (10) ◽  
pp. 1114-1121 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eliezer Sidon ◽  
Ryan Rogero ◽  
Timothy Bell ◽  
Elizabeth McDonald ◽  
Rachel J. Shakked ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Case Series ◽  
Hallux Rigidus ◽  
Long Term Results ◽  
Retrospective Case ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
First Metatarsophalangeal Joint ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Long Term Follow Up

Background:Hallux rigidus is the most common arthritic condition in the foot. First metatarsophalangeal joint cheilectomy produces satisfactory results in retrospective studies with reported good to excellent results in up to 97% and pain relief and function in 92%. The results of cheilectomy for higher grades of hallux rigidus are less favorable. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the long-term functional results and survivorship of cheilectomy for treatment of hallux rigidus.Methods:This was a retrospective, questionnaire-based study investigating the long-term results of cheilectomy for treatment of hallux rigidus. The preoperative arthritic grade was graded retrospectively according to the Hattrup and Johnson (H&J) grading system. A questionnaire was administered via email or telephone that included questions regarding pain recurrence following surgery, current functional status, and satisfaction with the operation. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed to estimate survival time between arthritic grades. We reviewed 165 patients (169 feet) with an average follow-up of 6.6 (5.0-10.9) years.Results:The overall survival rate (painless at the time of last follow-up) was 70.4% (119 feet), with no significant difference between the 3 H&J arthritic grades. Most of the recurrences (28 feet, 75%) were at the first 2 years following the surgery. Nine feet (5.3%) had a second procedure at a mean postoperative time of 3.6 (range, 1.6-7.4) years. Of the 169 feet, 117 (69.3%) reported being satisfied or very satisfied and 127 (75.1%) indicated they would repeat the operation under the same circumstances.Conclusion:Our study supports the use of cheilectomy for treatment of hallux rigidus (grade 1-3 Coughlin and Shurnas) as a reliable procedure with favorable results. At long-term follow-up, patients who underwent cheilectomy had a low revision rate and a moderately low rate of pain recurrence.Level of Evidence:Level IV, retrospective case-series.

Midterm Outcomes of a Synthetic Cartilage Implant for the First Metatarsophalangeal Joint in Advanced Hallux Rigidus

2018 ◽  
Vol 40 (4) ◽  
pp. 374-383 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark Glazebrook ◽  
Chris M. Blundell ◽  
Dominic O’Dowd ◽  
Dishan Singh ◽  
Gwyneth de Vries ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Case Series ◽  
Metatarsophalangeal Joint ◽  
Hallux Rigidus ◽  
Implant Removal ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
First Metatarsophalangeal Joint ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Pain Visual Analog Scale ◽  
Safety Parameters ◽  
Clinically Significant

Background: A prospective, randomized, noninferiority clinical trial of synthetic cartilage implant hemiarthroplasty for hallux rigidus demonstrated functional outcomes and safety equivalent to first metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joint arthrodesis at 24 months. We prospectively assessed safety and efficacy outcomes for synthetic cartilage implant hemiarthroplasty at a minimum of 5 years. Methods: Of 135 eligible patients from the original trial, 112 (83.0%) were enrolled (mean age, 58.2 ± 8.8 years; 87 females). Pain visual analog scale (VAS), Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) Activities of Daily Living (ADL), and FAAM Sports subscales were completed preoperatively and 2 and 5 years postoperatively. Great toe active dorsiflexion, weightbearing radiographs, secondary procedures, and safety parameters were also evaluated. Results: At 24 months, 14/152 (9.2%) patients had undergone implant removal and conversion to arthrodesis. In years 2 to 5, 9/119 (7.6%) patients underwent implant removal and conversion to arthrodesis. At mean 5.8 ± 0.7 (range, 4.4-8.0) years’ follow-up, pain VAS, FAAM ADL, and FAAM Sports scores improved by 57.9 ± 18.6 points, 33.0 ± 17.6 points, and 47.9 ± 27.1 points, respectively, from baseline. Clinically significant changes in VAS pain, FAAM ADL, and FAAM Sports were reported by 103/106 (97.2%), 95/105 (90.5%), and 97/104 (93.3%) patients, respectively. Patient-reported outcomes at 24 months were maintained at 5.8 years in patients who were not revised. Active MTP joint peak dorsiflexion was maintained. Ninety-nine of 106 (93.4%) patients would have the procedure again. Conclusion: Clinical and safety outcomes for synthetic cartilage implant hemiarthroplasty observed at 2 years were maintained at 5.8 years. The implant remains a viable treatment option to decrease pain, improve function, and maintain motion for advanced hallux rigidus. Level of Evidence: Level IV, case series.

scholarly journals Metatarsophalangeal arthroscopy of the hallux

2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 119-123
Author(s):  
Maria Augusta Back Nascimento ◽  
Anna Carolina Coelho Nogueira ◽  
Carlos Daniel Cândido de Castro Filho ◽  
André Vitor Kerber Cavalcante Lemos ◽  
Mário Sérgio Paulillo de Cillo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Case Series ◽  
Metatarsophalangeal Joint ◽  
Hallux Rigidus ◽  
Modified Technique ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
First Metatarsophalangeal Joint ◽  
Nylon Mesh ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Traction Device

Objective: This study sought to describe a modified arthroscopic technique in which a traction device with a horizontal vector and nylon mesh are used to allow continuous and uniform distraction without requiring an assistant surgeon to perform manual traction. Methods: Nine patients (seven females and two males; mean age 31.8 [30-52] years) with an indication for treatment of this joint who had been diagnosed with different pathologies, including synovitis, hallux vagus, and hallux rigidus, were selected and underwent arthroscopy of the first metatarsophalangeal joint using this modified technique. Results: Patient evaluations determined using the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) Ankle-Hindfoot Scale were recorded before and after surgery. The mean scores before and after the procedure were 43.66 (32-55) and 95.22 (90-8), respectively. No scars or joint complications were observed at a six-month follow-up, and all subjects experienced rapid recovery and quickly returned to daily functions. Conclusion: Similarly to conventional arthroscopy of the metatarsophalangeal joint, the modified technique produced satisfactory surgical outcomes; moreover, this technique reduced surgical time and improved the surgeon’s autonomy by obviating the need for an assistant surgeon to perform traction. Level of Evidence IV; Therapeutic Studies; Case Series.

scholarly journals Treatment of End-Stage Hallux Rigidus and Impact of Arthrodesis versus Arthroplasty on Patient Reported Outcomes

2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 2473011417S0001
Author(s):  
Monique Chambers ◽  
MaCalus Hogan ◽  
Dukens LaBaze
Keyword(s):  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Surgical Intervention ◽  
Metatarsophalangeal Joint ◽  
Hallux Rigidus ◽  
First Metatarsophalangeal Joint ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Outcome Scores ◽  
Vas Scores ◽  
End Stage

Category: Bunion, Midfoot/Forefoot Introduction/Purpose: Hallux rigidus is a degenerative disease of the first metatarsophalangeal joint. Severe, end-stage hallux rigidus can become debilitating with surgical intervention becoming necessary once conservative measures and shoe modifications have failed. Joint salvage procedures include metatarsal phalangeal (MTP) arthrodesis and MTP arthroplasty. The purpose of this study was to assess for differences in patient reported outcomes in two cohorts who underwent fusion or joint reconstruction. Methods: This study was a retrospective review of prospectively collected data of 385 patients from an academic medical institution. Patients who underwent surgical intervention from July 2015 to November 2016 were identified based on CPT codes for MTP arthrodesis (28750) and arthroplasty (28293). We extracted outcome scores including SF12-M, SF12-P, FAAM, and VAS scores. Exclusion criteria included poly-trauma, revision procedures, and lack of pre and post-operative outcome scores. Mann- Whitney t-test was performed using GraphPad Prism version 7.0b for Mac to compare procedure groups, with significance define by a p-value of 0.05. Results: A total of eighteen patients met the inclusion criteria, with 6 who underwent arthroplasty and 12 arthrodesis. The average age was 63.7 amongst the cohort, with a total of 16 female and 2 males. Patients who underwent arthrodesis had better outcomes across all parameters. When comparing preoperative and postoperative scores, arthrodesis patients showed greater improvement of SF12-M (arthrodesis 9 vs arthroplasty -2, p=0.05), and SF12-P (9 vs -16, respectively p=0.05) scores. Arthroplasty patients were more likely to have a decrease in their SF-12 scores. VAS scores and FAAM scores showed no statistical difference between the two cohorts. Postoperative VAS scores were worse in 33% of arthroplasty patients despite surgical intervention, compared to 10% of arthrodesis patients. Conclusion: Our results suggests that both procedures provide a statistically significant difference in pain with several patients having a Global Rate of Change that is “very much better”. However, fusion of the metatarsophalangeal joint results in improved pain and functional outcomes for patients with severe hallux rigidus. These findings are consistent with current reports in the literature, which are mostly case series reports. Larger studies are needed to provide appropriate power and better support the findings of this study.

Evaluation of Metatarsal Head Resurfacing Hemiarthroplasty in the Surgical Treatment of Hallux Rigidus: A Retrospective Study and Mid- to Long-Term Follow-up

2017 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 22-31 ◽  
Author(s):  
Musa Uğur Mermerkaya ◽  
Erkan Alkan ◽  
Mehmet Ayvaz
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Treatment ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Metatarsophalangeal Joint ◽  
Metatarsal Head ◽  
Treatment Method ◽  
Hallux Rigidus ◽  
Retrospective Case ◽  
First Metatarsophalangeal Joint

Background. The aim of this study was to evaluate the mid- to long-term outcomes of metatarsal head resurfacing hemiarthroplasty in the surgical treatment of advanced-stage hallux rigidus. Methods. We performed a retrospective review of 57 consecutive patients (25 [43.9%] males, 32 [56.1%] females; mean age, 61.0 ± 6.4 years) who underwent first metatarsal head resurfacing hemiarthroplasty (HemiCAP) for hallux rigidus between August 2007 and September 2010. Sixty-five implantations were performed in 57 patients; 8 patients underwent bilateral procedures. All patients were clinically rated prior to surgery and at the final follow-up visit using the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) hallux metatarsophalangeal-interphalangeal scale and first metatarsophalangeal joint range of motion (MTPJ ROM). Results. The median follow-up duration was 81 (range = 8-98) months. The median preoperative AOFAS score was 34 (range = 22-59) points, which had increased to 83 (range = 26-97) points at the final follow-up visit (P < .001). The median preoperative first MTPJ ROM was 25° (range = 15° to 40°), which had increased to 75° (range = 30° to 85°) at the final follow-up visit (P < .001). Conclusions. First MTPJ hemiarthroplasty is an effective treatment method that recovers toe function and first MTPJ ROM, and provides good mid- to long-term functional outcomes. Levels of Evidence: Level IV: Retrospective case series

scholarly journals Outcomes Following Interposition Arthroplasty of the First Metatarsophalangeal Joint for the Treatment of Hallux Rigidus: A Systematic Review

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 247301141881442 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brendan R. Emmons ◽  
Dominic S. Carreira
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Metatarsophalangeal Joint ◽  
Hallux Rigidus ◽  
Cochrane Central Register ◽  
Interposition Arthroplasty ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
First Metatarsophalangeal Joint ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Long Term Follow Up

Background: Interposition arthroplasty of the first MTP joint has recently experienced renewed interest as a treatment for hallux rigidus. The purpose of this study was to systematically review the rapidly expanding literature on PRO following interposition arthroplasty of the first MTP joint. Methods: PubMed Central, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register for Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) were searched. Inclusion criteria included length of time to follow-up, number of patients, outcome measure, and use of allogeneic or autogenous soft tissue or a synthetic matrix as interposition. Results: 20 studies were included in the review, comprising 498 patients and 539 feet with mean time to follow-up of 4.5 years. The most common substance used for interposition in the included studies was autogenous first MTPJ capsular tissue, a technique reported on in 12 (60.0%) of the included articles. In studies reporting preoperative and postoperative outcomes by way of a standardized outcome scoring system, mean group improvements exceed minimal clinically important differences in the majority of studies. Eighty-five percent of the studies included in this review were of Level IV quality evidence, and of this subset of studies, 70.6% were of a retrospective nature. Progression to further surgery was observed in 3.8% of toes. The most common complication reported was transfer metatarsalgia of 1 or more lesser toes, observed in up to 57.9% of patients in one study. Conclusion: Interposition arthroplasty appears to be a viable option for the treatment of moderate to severe hallux rigidus in patients looking to salvage motion through the first metatarsophalangeal joint. A wide array of autogenous, allogeneic, and synthetic implant materials have surfaced in recent years, but long-term follow-up and prospective, comparative study designs with low risk of bias are limited. Level of Evidence: Level IV, systematic review of Level III-IV studies

Silastic first metatarsophalangeal joint arthroplasty for the treatment of end-stage hallux rigidus

2020 ◽  
Vol 102-B (2) ◽  
pp. 220-226 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timothy M. Clough ◽  
Joseph Ring
Keyword(s):  
Metatarsophalangeal Joint ◽  
Visual Analogue Score ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome Measures ◽  
Hallux Rigidus ◽  
First Metatarsophalangeal Joint ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Silastic Implant ◽  
The Mean ◽  
End Stage

Aims Arthroplasty for end-stage hallux rigidus (HR) is controversial. Arthrodesis remains the gold standard for surgical treatment, although is not without its complications, with rates of up to 10% for nonunion, 14% for reoperation and 10% for metatarsalgia. The aim of this study was to analyze the outcome of a double-stemmed silastic implant (Wright-Medical, Memphis, Tennessee, USA) for patients with end-stage HR. Methods We conducted a retrospective review of 108 consecutive implants in 76 patients, between January 2005 and December 2016, with a minimum follow-up of two years. The mean age of the patients at the time of surgery was 61.6 years (42 to 84). There were 104 females and four males. Clinical, radiological, patient reported outcome measures (PROMS) data, a visual analogue score (VAS) for pain, and satisfaction scores were collected. Results The survivorship at a mean follow-up of 5.3 years (2.1 to 14.1) was 97.2%. The mean Manchester Oxford Foot and Ankle Questionnaire (MOXFQ) scores improved from 78.1 to 11.0, and VAS scores for pain from 7/10 to 1.3/10. The rate of satisfaction was 90.6%. Three implants (2.8%) required revision; one for infection, one-month postoperatively, and two for stem breakage at 10.4 and 13.3 years postoperatively. There was a 1.9% reoperation rate other than revision, 23.1% of patients developed a minor complication, and 21.1% of patients had non-progressive and asymptomatic cysts on radiological review. Conclusion We report a 97.2% survivorship at a mean follow-up of 5.3 years with this implant. We did not find progressive osteolysis, as has been previously reported. These results suggest that this double-stemmed silastic implant provides a predictable and reliable alternative with comparable outcomes to arthrodesis for the treatment of end-stage HR. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(2):220–226.

Rolled Tendon Allograft Interposition Arthroplasty for Salvage Surgery of the Hallux Metatarsophalangeal Joint

2018 ◽  
Vol 39 (4) ◽  
pp. 458-462 ◽  
Author(s):  
Danielle Thomas ◽  
David Thordarson
Keyword(s):  
Operative Procedure ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Metatarsophalangeal Joint ◽  
Joint Space ◽  
Hallux Rigidus ◽  
Salvage Treatment ◽  
High Rate ◽  
Interposition Arthroplasty ◽  
First Metatarsophalangeal Joint ◽  
Interpositional Arthroplasty

Background: Hallux rigidus is a common osteoarthritic disease of the first metatarsophalangeal joint (MTPJ). Few salvage treatment options exist that preserve motion for patients who have failed an initial procedure and who are not amenable to fusion, typically patients who are active or who would like to wear high heels. Allograft tendon interpositional arthroplasty is an unconventional salvage treatment option that may preserve motion and prevent bone loss. Methods: A retrospective chart review is reported of 19 patients who failed previous procedures and refused fusion who underwent allograft tendon interpositional arthroplasty of the hallux MTPJ by a single surgeon between 2012 and 2015. Outcomes included the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) hallux metatarsophalangeal-interphalangeal scale assessment as well as measurement of apparent joint space on anterior to posterior and lateral views. Results: The cumulative average AOFAS score for all patients was 68.5 preoperatively and 74.1 postoperatively. The average AOFAS pain subscore was 24.7 preoperatively and 26.8 postoperatively (SD = 7.7 and 13.8, respectively). Radiographically, patients had an increase in apparent joint space from pre- to postoperatively, most notable on the lateral view (0.6 to 4.7 mm; SD = 0.7 and 3.2 mm). Five patients required a second operative procedure, for an overall 26% reoperation rate. One patient underwent hallux MTPJ fusion after the interpositional arthroplasty. An additional 4 patients (21%) had symptoms requiring a steroid injection, and another 3 patients (16%) were recommended to undergo a revision procedure based on their symptoms. Conclusion: Rolled allograft tendon interposition arthroplasty performed poorly as a salvage strategy for failed previous hallux MTPJ surgery for hallux rigidus because of a high rate of complication and minimal benefits. The senior author has abandoned the technique. Level of Evidence: Level IV, retrospective case series.

scholarly journals Minimally invasive intramedullary fixation with flexible nails in the treatment of metatarsal neck fractures

2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 97-103 ◽  
Author(s):  
Victor Chammas ◽  
Inácio Diogo Asaumi ◽  
Alfonso Apostólico Netto ◽  
Rafael Da Rocha Macedo ◽  
Donato Lo Turco ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Statistical Tests ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Metatarsophalangeal Joint ◽  
Intramedullary Fixation ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Fracture Consolidation ◽  
Flexible Intramedullary Nails

Objective: This study was designed to retrospectively assess patients with deviated central metatarsal neck fractures subjected to reduction and fixation with flexible intramedullary nails. Methods: Thirty-six patients (36 feet) diagnosed with acute fractures of one or more metatarsals and whose therapeutic indication was exclusively surgical were evaluated between June 2010 and August 2011. Considering the metatarsophalangeal joint, such injuries should be located up to two centimeters in the proximal direction of this segment, with plantar deviation greater than 10 degrees and translation greater than three millimeters in any plane. Minimally invasive intramedullary fixation with two flexible titanium nails was used when adequate stability was not obtained with the use of one nail. The visual analog scale (VAS), American Orthopedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) forefoot score and specific statistical tests were used. Results: There was a significant (p<0.001) improvement in the results until 6 months of follow-up. There was no significant difference (p>0.05) in the results between 6 and 12 months of follow-up. The average time of consolidation was 8 weeks, and there were no complications during the period evaluated. Conclusion: This technique provided a significant (p<0.001) improvement in the VAS and AOFAS forefoot scores at 6 months of follow-up. Between 6 and 12 months of postoperative follow-up, we did not observe a significant (p<0.05) difference in the results of the analysis due to stabilization of the condition and fracture consolidation. Although the results were considered excellent, the level of evidence of studies should be increased to effectively demonstrate the efficacy of this technique. Level of Evidence IV; Therapeutic Studies; Case Series.

Patient Satisfaction Following Hallux Rigidus Treatment With a Synthetic Cartilage Implant

2021 ◽  
pp. 193864002110019
Author(s):  
Wonyong Lee ◽  
Carol Wang ◽  
Dan Prat ◽  
Keith L. Wapner ◽  
Wen Chao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Patient Satisfaction ◽  
Functional Outcomes ◽  
Corticosteroid Injection ◽  
Sport Activity ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Hallux Rigidus ◽  
Lower Percentage ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Patient Reported

Background There remains no clear consensus on patient satisfaction and functional outcomes following synthetic cartilage implant (SCI) implantation for hallux rigidus. The purpose of this study was to review our experience at a single academic institution using an SCI for treatment of hallux rigidus. Methods A retrospective review was performed of patients who underwent the SCI procedure for treatment of hallux rigidus between January 2017 and May 2019. Functional outcomes were evaluated using Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Informational System (PROMIS)-10 scores as well as a survey investigating patient satisfaction, self-reported clinical improvement, and changes in sporting ability. Patients were divided into satisfied versus unsatisfied subgroups, and between-group differences in preoperative variables and complications were reviewed. A total of 90 patients (96 implants) were included in this study. The mean follow-up time was 26.4 months. Results In all, 81.2% of patients reported that their foot was “much improved” (55.2%) or “improved” (26.0%) since undergoing the SCI procedure, whereas a slightly lower percentage, 74.0%, stated that they were “extremely satisfied” (41.7%) or “satisfied” (32.3%) at final follow-up. Patients were able to tolerate higher impact sporting activities after the procedure, and 75.0% of patients stated they would have the same surgery again. PROMIS-10 T-scores averaged 54.2 points for physical health and 57.4 points for mental health. Only 2.1% of patients required conversion to arthrodesis. Significant differences between the satisfied versus unsatisfied subgroups were found in preoperative corticosteroid injection use (21.1% vs 41.1%, respectively; P = .029) and preoperative VAS pain score (8.2 vs 7.1, respectively; P = .036). Conclusion The SCI procedure can be a viable option for treating hallux rigidus with high satisfaction overall, increased sport activity levels, and a very low revision rate. However, maximizing patient satisfaction may require more careful consideration of preoperative prognosticators and extensive patient counseling to ensure realistic expectations for recovery time and individual outcome. Level of Evidence: Level IV: Retrospective case series

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document