scholarly journals Outcomes Following Interposition Arthroplasty of the First Metatarsophalangeal Joint for the Treatment of Hallux Rigidus: A Systematic Review

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 247301141881442 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brendan R. Emmons ◽  
Dominic S. Carreira
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Metatarsophalangeal Joint ◽  
Hallux Rigidus ◽  
Cochrane Central Register ◽  
Interposition Arthroplasty ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
First Metatarsophalangeal Joint ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Long Term Follow Up

Background: Interposition arthroplasty of the first MTP joint has recently experienced renewed interest as a treatment for hallux rigidus. The purpose of this study was to systematically review the rapidly expanding literature on PRO following interposition arthroplasty of the first MTP joint. Methods: PubMed Central, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register for Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) were searched. Inclusion criteria included length of time to follow-up, number of patients, outcome measure, and use of allogeneic or autogenous soft tissue or a synthetic matrix as interposition. Results: 20 studies were included in the review, comprising 498 patients and 539 feet with mean time to follow-up of 4.5 years. The most common substance used for interposition in the included studies was autogenous first MTPJ capsular tissue, a technique reported on in 12 (60.0%) of the included articles. In studies reporting preoperative and postoperative outcomes by way of a standardized outcome scoring system, mean group improvements exceed minimal clinically important differences in the majority of studies. Eighty-five percent of the studies included in this review were of Level IV quality evidence, and of this subset of studies, 70.6% were of a retrospective nature. Progression to further surgery was observed in 3.8% of toes. The most common complication reported was transfer metatarsalgia of 1 or more lesser toes, observed in up to 57.9% of patients in one study. Conclusion: Interposition arthroplasty appears to be a viable option for the treatment of moderate to severe hallux rigidus in patients looking to salvage motion through the first metatarsophalangeal joint. A wide array of autogenous, allogeneic, and synthetic implant materials have surfaced in recent years, but long-term follow-up and prospective, comparative study designs with low risk of bias are limited. Level of Evidence: Level IV, systematic review of Level III-IV studies

scholarly journals Is Interposition Arthroplasty a Viable Option for Treatment of Moderate to Severe Hallux Rigidus? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 2473011418S0042
Author(s):  
Ashish Shah ◽  
Harshadkumar Patel ◽  
Sameer Naranje ◽  
Henry DeBell ◽  
Andrew McGee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Metatarsophalangeal Joint ◽  
Scoring Systems ◽  
Hallux Rigidus ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Viable Option ◽  
Interposition Arthroplasty ◽  
First Metatarsophalangeal Joint

Category: Midfoot/Forefoot Introduction/Purpose: Hallux rigidus is a painful arthritis of the first metatarsophalangeal joint that causes progressive loss of mobility. Treatment options include activity modifications, analgesics, corticosteroids, and surgery. Arthrodesis of the MTP joint is considered the gold standard treatment for hallux rigidus, but it is often reserved for advanced. Interposition arthroplasty uses a spacer taken from an autograft, allograft, or synthetic material. For patients with severe arthritic diseases who would like to preserve MTP joint function, interposition arthroplasty may be a viable option. The purpose of this systematic review is to investigate patient outcomes after undergoing interposition arthroplasty of the MTP joint. The objectives are to determine if this technique is practical for patients who would prefer to avoid arthrodesis, and to systematically analyze post-operative improvement. Methods: The systematic review was performed following PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analyses) guidelines. Medline, pubmed, Embase, and Cohrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDRS) were searched for publications from 2000 to 2017. Duplicates were then removed, and titles and abstracts were reviewed to confirm the relevance f the study. Studies were included if they reported results of first MTP joint interposition arthroplasty in one of the well-known scoring systems: AOFAS, FFI, or SF-36. Studies also were also required to have a 12 month follow up. Systematic review and data extraction were performed on all selected studies. Means were recorded and placed in tables for all variables including scoring results and complication rates. A linear regression model comparing the change in preoperative to postoperative AOFAS scores between the autogenous versus allogenous interposition materials was performed. Results: Database searches produced 574 articles for review. 15 of these were included in the systematic review. Mean AOFAS score was improved from 41.35 preoperatively to 83.17 postoperatively. Mean pain, function, and alignment scores improved from preoperative values of 14.9, 24.9, and 10 to postoperative values of 33.3, 35.8, and 14.5. Mean dorsiflexion increased from 21.27 degrees (5-30) to 42.03 degrees (25-71). Mean ROM improved from 21.06 to 46.43 degrees. Eighty-seven percent of patients were satisfied to highly satisfied with their surgery and would choose surgery again. Joint space increased by 0.8 mm to 2.5 mm. The most common complications included metatarsalgia (13.9%), loss of ground contact (9.7%), osteonecrosis (5.4%), great toe weakness (4.8%), hypoesthesia (4.2%), decreased push off power (4.2%), and callous formation (4.2%). Conclusion: The management of hallux rigidus remains heavily debated. This systematic review of the current literature suggests that interposition arthroplasty is a viable short and intermediate term treatment for hallux rigidus in terms of patient satisfaction, pain scores, and AOFAS scores. Further studies with greater sample sizes, more uniform methods, and longer follow-up times are needed to further support the superiority of interposition arthroplasty.

Interposition Arthroplasty in the Treatment of End-Stage Hallux Rigidus: A Systematic Review

2021 ◽  
pp. 193864002110539
Author(s):  
Francesco Di Caprio ◽  
Massimiliano Mosca ◽  
Francesco Ceccarelli ◽  
Silvio Caravelli ◽  
Marco Di Ponte ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Hallux Rigidus ◽  
Prosthetic Replacement ◽  
Interposition Arthroplasty ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Advantages And Disadvantages ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Pubmed Search ◽  
End Stage

Purpose Patients affected by moderate to severe hallux rigidus may opt for interposition arthroplasty to avoid the movement restrictions of arthrodesis and the complications related to prosthetic replacement. The propose of this article was to review the current literature about interposition arthroplasty to examine the overall outcomes and to evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of different types of technique, compared with more consolidated procedures. Methods A literature PubMed search was performed. Studies reporting the results of interposition arthroplasty in moderate to severe hallux rigidus were included. The data were pooled and weighted for number of patients in every study. Results The overall results for interposition arthroplasties are comparable to other alternatives for end-stage hallux rigidus, providing better plantar load distribution than arthrodesis and avoiding the drawbacks of prosthetic replacement. Among the various interposition arthroplasty techniques, the Modified Oblique Keller Capsular Interposition Arthroplasty technique preserves toe length and flexor hallucis brevis function, showing the highest satisfaction rate, with lowest metatarsalgia and revision rate. Conclusion Although long-term randomized controlled trials are lacking for interposition arthroplasty, it represents a valid alternative for the treatment of end-stage hallux rigidus also in the young active patient who wants to avoid a definitive intervention immediately. Level of evidence III (systematic review of level III-IV-V studies)

Long-term Follow-up of Cheilectomy for Treatment of Hallux Rigidus

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (10) ◽  
pp. 1114-1121 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eliezer Sidon ◽  
Ryan Rogero ◽  
Timothy Bell ◽  
Elizabeth McDonald ◽  
Rachel J. Shakked ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Case Series ◽  
Hallux Rigidus ◽  
Long Term Results ◽  
Retrospective Case ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
First Metatarsophalangeal Joint ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Long Term Follow Up

Background:Hallux rigidus is the most common arthritic condition in the foot. First metatarsophalangeal joint cheilectomy produces satisfactory results in retrospective studies with reported good to excellent results in up to 97% and pain relief and function in 92%. The results of cheilectomy for higher grades of hallux rigidus are less favorable. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the long-term functional results and survivorship of cheilectomy for treatment of hallux rigidus.Methods:This was a retrospective, questionnaire-based study investigating the long-term results of cheilectomy for treatment of hallux rigidus. The preoperative arthritic grade was graded retrospectively according to the Hattrup and Johnson (H&J) grading system. A questionnaire was administered via email or telephone that included questions regarding pain recurrence following surgery, current functional status, and satisfaction with the operation. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed to estimate survival time between arthritic grades. We reviewed 165 patients (169 feet) with an average follow-up of 6.6 (5.0-10.9) years.Results:The overall survival rate (painless at the time of last follow-up) was 70.4% (119 feet), with no significant difference between the 3 H&J arthritic grades. Most of the recurrences (28 feet, 75%) were at the first 2 years following the surgery. Nine feet (5.3%) had a second procedure at a mean postoperative time of 3.6 (range, 1.6-7.4) years. Of the 169 feet, 117 (69.3%) reported being satisfied or very satisfied and 127 (75.1%) indicated they would repeat the operation under the same circumstances.Conclusion:Our study supports the use of cheilectomy for treatment of hallux rigidus (grade 1-3 Coughlin and Shurnas) as a reliable procedure with favorable results. At long-term follow-up, patients who underwent cheilectomy had a low revision rate and a moderately low rate of pain recurrence.Level of Evidence:Level IV, retrospective case-series.

scholarly journals Metatarsophalangeal arthroscopy of the hallux

2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 119-123
Author(s):  
Maria Augusta Back Nascimento ◽  
Anna Carolina Coelho Nogueira ◽  
Carlos Daniel Cândido de Castro Filho ◽  
André Vitor Kerber Cavalcante Lemos ◽  
Mário Sérgio Paulillo de Cillo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Case Series ◽  
Metatarsophalangeal Joint ◽  
Hallux Rigidus ◽  
Modified Technique ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
First Metatarsophalangeal Joint ◽  
Nylon Mesh ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Traction Device

Objective: This study sought to describe a modified arthroscopic technique in which a traction device with a horizontal vector and nylon mesh are used to allow continuous and uniform distraction without requiring an assistant surgeon to perform manual traction. Methods: Nine patients (seven females and two males; mean age 31.8 [30-52] years) with an indication for treatment of this joint who had been diagnosed with different pathologies, including synovitis, hallux vagus, and hallux rigidus, were selected and underwent arthroscopy of the first metatarsophalangeal joint using this modified technique. Results: Patient evaluations determined using the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) Ankle-Hindfoot Scale were recorded before and after surgery. The mean scores before and after the procedure were 43.66 (32-55) and 95.22 (90-8), respectively. No scars or joint complications were observed at a six-month follow-up, and all subjects experienced rapid recovery and quickly returned to daily functions. Conclusion: Similarly to conventional arthroscopy of the metatarsophalangeal joint, the modified technique produced satisfactory surgical outcomes; moreover, this technique reduced surgical time and improved the surgeon’s autonomy by obviating the need for an assistant surgeon to perform traction. Level of Evidence IV; Therapeutic Studies; Case Series.

Outcomes After Interpositional Arthroplasty of the First Metatarsophalangeal Joint

2017 ◽  
Vol 38 (5) ◽  
pp. 514-518 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael C. Aynardi ◽  
Lara Atwater ◽  
Eric J. Dein ◽  
Talal Zahoor ◽  
Lew C. Schon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Case Series ◽  
Metatarsophalangeal Joint ◽  
Hallux Rigidus ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
First Metatarsophalangeal Joint ◽  
Interpositional Arthroplasty ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Functional Scores

Background: For patients with hallux rigidus seeking a motion-sparing procedure, interposition arthroplasty is an alternative to fusion. The purpose of this study was to report patient outcomes after interpositional arthroplasty for hallux rigidus. Methods: All patients undergoing interpositional arthroplasty at our institution from 2001 to 2014 were identified and a retrospective chart review was performed. Follow-up was conducted through a telephone survey to obtain survivorship, satisfaction, and functional scores. Survivorship of the interpositional arthroplasty procedure was defined as no subsequent surgery on the hallux after the index procedure. Patients were excluded for incomplete records. Complications were recorded. From 2001 to 2014, 183 patients were identified. Of these, 14 were excluded for incomplete data, leaving 169 patients. Of these, 133 had an average follow-up of 62.2 months (range, 24.3 months to 151.2 months). Results: The overall failure rate was 3.8% (5/133). Patient-reported outcome was rated as excellent in 65.4% (87/133) or good in 24.1% (32/133) of patients and fair or poor in 10.5% (14/133) of patients. Of 133 patients, 101 (76%) were able to return to fashionable or regular footwear. The infection rate was 1.5% (2/133). Patient-reported cock-up deformity of the first metatarsophalangeal joint (MTPJ) occurred in 4.5% (6/133) of patients. In addition, 17.3% (23/133) of patients reported metatarsalgia of the second or third MTPJ at the time of final follow-up, and there was no significant difference between interposition types ( P = .441). Conclusion: Interpositional arthroplasty for hallux rigidus was found to have excellent or good results in most patients at a mean follow-up of 62.2 months. Level of Evidence: Level IV, retrospective case series.

scholarly journals Proposed treatment algorithm for hallux rigidus

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 205-207
Author(s):  
Mario Herrera-Perez ◽  
David González-Martín ◽  
Ramón Viladot-Pericé
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Hyaluronic Acid ◽  
Gold Standard ◽  
Treatment Algorithm ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Metatarsophalangeal Joint ◽  
Hallux Rigidus ◽  
Interposition Arthroplasty ◽  
Level Of Evidence

This study performs a literature review on the treatment of hallux rigidus and proposes a treatment algorithm.This literature systematic review expanded a similar study conducted in 2014 by the authors and analyzed the levels of recommendation according to scientific evidence.Most articles found in the search present scarce evidence (level IV or case series), we only found 8 articles with an at least moderate level of recommendation (B); of these, only one article had a level of evidence I.Conservative treatment is effective with the implementation of footwear modifications, use of insoles, and infiltrations with hyaluronic acid. Cheilectomy, either isolated or combined with Moberg osteotomy, shows good outcomes in stage III, or moderate, although its outcomes worsen after 5 years. Metatarsophalangeal joint (MTPJ) arthrodesis is still the gold standard in stage IV, or advanced. In recent years, the technique of interposition arthroplasty has re-emerged, especially with the use of a synthetic cartilage implant (Cartiva®), with outcomes at least similar to those of MTPJ arthrodesis in comparative studies. Level of Evidence III; Therapeutic Studies; Systematic Review of Level III Studies.

Arthrodesis of First Metatarsophalangeal Joint by Plate and Screws for Treatment of Hallux Rigidus (Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis)

QJM ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 114 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ossama Abdelraoof El Shazly ◽  
Mohamed Mokhtar Abdellah ◽  
Mostafa Abdelnabee Abouzaid
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Observational Studies ◽  
Plate Fixation ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Metatarsophalangeal Joint ◽  
Hallux Rigidus ◽  
Superficial Infection ◽  
First Metatarsophalangeal Joint ◽  
Non Union ◽  
Meta Analyses

Abstract Background With continued loss of dorsiflexion of the 1st MTP, degenerative changes occur within the joint with severe restriction of movement and increase in pain, which leads to the condition known as hallux rigidus. The amount of dorsiflexion may be reduced to 0-10 degrees with pain on both active and passive motion. Objectives Systematically reviewing available evidence from published articles to assess the effectiveness of arthrodesis of first metatarsophalangeal joint by plate and screws in hallux rigidus. The assessment also would encompass safety, side effects, and complications of this mode of treatment. Materials and Methods We performed this systematic review and meta-analysis in accordance to the recommendations of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement and Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) statement. PRISMA and MOOSE are reporting checklists for Authors, Editors, and Reviewers of Meta-analyses of interventional and observational studies. According to International committee of medical journal association (ICJME), reviewers must report their findings according to each of the items listed in those checklists. Results Previous results for arthrodesis have been favourable with a union rate of almost 96%. In the present systematic review and meta-analysis, the overall effect estimates showed that the union rates after plate and screw arthrodesis for 1st MTPJ was 96.2% (95% CI 94 – 98.4%). In addition, the overall effect estimates showed that the non-union rates after plate and screw arthrodesis for 1st MTPJ was 4.2% (95% CI 2.4 – 6.1%). Moreover, the overall effect estimates showed that the satisfaction rates after plate and screw arthrodesis for 1st MTPJ was 94.5% (95% CI 90 – 99%). In the present study, the overall effect estimates showed that the overall complications rate after plate and screw arthrodesis for 1st MTPJ was 7.2% (95% CI 2.5 – 12%). The overall effect estimates showed that the malunion rates after plate and screw arthrodesis for 1st MTPJ was 2.7% (95% CI 0 – 6.4%). Additionally, the overall effect estimates showed that the hardware removal and superficial infection rates after plate and screw arthrodesis for 1st MTPJ were 2% and 2.9%, respectively. Conclusion Our analysis showed that plate and screws fixation is effective techniques that can be used for first MTPJ arthrodesis in patients with hallux rigidus. We found that the screw and plate fixation has a significantly lower rate of nonunion compared with the screw alone, as reported by the literature. However, owing to the small group sizes and methodologic shortcomings, we were unable to identify the clinically superior fixation technique for first MTPJ arthrodesis arthrodesis.

scholarly journals Allograft Tendon Interposition Arthroplasty of the Hallux Metatarsophalangeal Joint: A Technique Guide and Literature Review

2018 ◽  
Vol 40 (1) ◽  
pp. 113-119 ◽  
Author(s):  
Troy S. Watson ◽  
Jordan Panicco ◽  
Amit Parekh
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Metatarsophalangeal Joint ◽  
Joint Space ◽  
Hallux Rigidus ◽  
Senior Author ◽  
Bone Tunnel ◽  
Interposition Arthroplasty ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Tissue Handling ◽  
Tendon Interposition

The “anchovy” interpositional arthroplasty technique can be used as a salvage option for failed hallux rigidus procedures. The operative technique utilized by the senior author is described. Careful soft-tissue handling, meticulous joint space and graft preparation, and interposition graft stabilization using a bone tunnel and suture anchors are unique aspects of this technique, which in the authors’ experience have contributed to improved outcomes. Current literature regarding indications and outcomes is limited and controversial. The proposed benefits of soft-tissue interposition arthroplasty of the hallux metatarsophalangeal joint for patients with prior failed implant arthroplasty are improved pain scores and preservation of range of motion. Level of Evidence: Level V, technique guide.

scholarly journals Evaluation of the Meniscal repair in Bucket handle. Systematic review

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (12_suppl5) ◽  
pp. 2325967118S0020
Author(s):  
Damián Bustos ◽  
Lucas Marangoni ◽  
Pablo Bertiche ◽  
Javier Núñez ◽  
Iván Bitar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Meniscal Repair ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Meniscal Lesions ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Bibliographic Search ◽  
Rate Of Failure ◽  
Bucket Handle

Introduction: Faced with a bucket meniscal lesion we have two treatment options. A frequently practiced option is to remove the bucket handle, another is to repair it. Generally, they are associated with ligament injuries. In this context, it has been shown that meniscal repair has a good result, but the evolution of isolated meniscal repairs is not entirely clear. The purpose of this systematic review is to determine the results after the repair of bucket handle injuries. Materials and Methods: A bibliographic search of the computerized database was carried out pubmed. Eight articles were included according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The results of interest included, level of evidence, number of patients, follow-up, average age, surgical technique,% cure,% failure, complications, associated injuries and average time from injury to surgical repair. Results: The works studied, on average, 43 patients, with ages between 16 and 33 years making 341 patients. The follow-up period was focused on 58 months. The percentage of cure varies from 52% to 98%. Conclusion: The isolated repair of this type of meniscal lesions has a good overall evolution associated with a low rate of failure and complications Level of evidence: IV Type of study systematic review

Evaluation of Metatarsal Head Resurfacing Hemiarthroplasty in the Surgical Treatment of Hallux Rigidus: A Retrospective Study and Mid- to Long-Term Follow-up

2017 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 22-31 ◽  
Author(s):  
Musa Uğur Mermerkaya ◽  
Erkan Alkan ◽  
Mehmet Ayvaz
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Treatment ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Metatarsophalangeal Joint ◽  
Metatarsal Head ◽  
Treatment Method ◽  
Hallux Rigidus ◽  
Retrospective Case ◽  
First Metatarsophalangeal Joint

Background. The aim of this study was to evaluate the mid- to long-term outcomes of metatarsal head resurfacing hemiarthroplasty in the surgical treatment of advanced-stage hallux rigidus. Methods. We performed a retrospective review of 57 consecutive patients (25 [43.9%] males, 32 [56.1%] females; mean age, 61.0 ± 6.4 years) who underwent first metatarsal head resurfacing hemiarthroplasty (HemiCAP) for hallux rigidus between August 2007 and September 2010. Sixty-five implantations were performed in 57 patients; 8 patients underwent bilateral procedures. All patients were clinically rated prior to surgery and at the final follow-up visit using the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) hallux metatarsophalangeal-interphalangeal scale and first metatarsophalangeal joint range of motion (MTPJ ROM). Results. The median follow-up duration was 81 (range = 8-98) months. The median preoperative AOFAS score was 34 (range = 22-59) points, which had increased to 83 (range = 26-97) points at the final follow-up visit (P < .001). The median preoperative first MTPJ ROM was 25° (range = 15° to 40°), which had increased to 75° (range = 30° to 85°) at the final follow-up visit (P < .001). Conclusions. First MTPJ hemiarthroplasty is an effective treatment method that recovers toe function and first MTPJ ROM, and provides good mid- to long-term functional outcomes. Levels of Evidence: Level IV: Retrospective case series

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document