Hematopoietic Abnormalities in Patients with Cancer

1998 ◽  
Vol 5 (2_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenneth S. Zuckerman

Understanding the concepts of normal hematopoiesis and the mechanisms of both disease- and treatment-related cytopenias assists in the proper management of patients and rational uses of hematopoietic growth factors, particularly in those cancer patients receiving chemotherapy with or without stem and progenitor cell transplantation.

1996 ◽  
Vol 75 (02) ◽  
pp. 368-371 ◽  
Author(s):  
T Barbul ◽  
G Finazzi ◽  
A Grassi ◽  
R Marchioli

SummaryHematopoietic colony-stimulating factors (CSFs) are largely used in patients with cancer undergoing cytotoxic treatment to accelerate neutrophil recovery and decrease the incidence of febrile neutropenia. Clinical practice guidelines for their use have been recently established (1), taking into account clinical benefit, but also cost and toxicity. Vascular occlusions have been recently reported among the severe reactions associated with the use of CSFs, in anedoctal case reports (2, 3), consecutive case series (4) and randomized clinical trial (5, 6). However, the role of CSFs in the pathogenesis of thrombotic complications is difficult to ascertain, because pertinent data are scanty and widely distributed over a number of heterogenous investigations. We report here a systematic review of relevant articles, with the aims to estimate the prevalence of thrombosis associated with the use of CSFs and to assess if this rate is significantly higher than that observed in cancer patients not receiving CSFs.


Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 4555-4555
Author(s):  
Charles L. Bennett ◽  
Ari Polish ◽  
Athena T Samaras ◽  
Mi Zheng ◽  
Dennis P West ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 4555 Introduction HGFs have vastly improved the management of anemia, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia, but are associated with unexpected toxicities. Methods Toxicities associated with granulocyte, erythroid, and thrombopoietic growth factors were reviewed. Data sources included systematic reviews, clinical trials, guidelines, and materials disseminated by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the European Medicines Agency (EMEA), and Canada Health and their advisory committees; product labels and safety notifications disseminated by manufacturers; and utilization data. Data abstracted were thromboembolic complications, immune-mediated cytopenias, bone marrow toxicities, systematic and synergistic toxicities, and regulatory responses. Results Granulopoiesis agents Pulmonary infiltrates were associated with administration of HGFs with bleomycin or chest radiation. Increased myelodysplasia (MDS) or acute myeloid leukemia (AML) risks among chemotherapy (chemo)-treated breast cancer patients were reported. ESAs Increased mortality and tumor progression were seen when cancer patients received ESAs versus placebo; increased mortality and cardiovascular events were reported when chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients received ESAs targeted to complete anemia correction. Between 1998 and 2003, 191 CKD patients developed neutralizing antibodies and pure red cell aplasia (PRCA) following recombinant erythropoietin administration. Thrombopoietins (TPO) TPO receptor agonist administration is associated with bone marrow reticulin and collagen deposition. 3% of healthy volunteers who received repeated rHuMGDF developed neutralizing autoantibodies and severe thrombocytopenia. Conclusions While ESAs, granulopoietic factors, and thrombopoietins have important clinical benefits, they also retain the potential to exhibit serious and unanticipated toxicities. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 2555-2555 ◽  
Author(s):  
LeAnn Norris ◽  
Zaina Qureshi ◽  
Sara Barnato ◽  
Stephen Lai ◽  
Charles Bennett

Abstract Abstract 2555 Erythrpoiesis stimulating agents (ESAs) and the granulocyte hematopoietic growth factors granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) and pegylated G-CSF revolutionized supportive care approaches to anemia and neutropenia, respectively. Thrombopoietin-receptor agonists improve antibody-mediated thrombocytopenia management. For these drugs, as with all agents, a comprehensive understanding of sADRs is important, however, often difficult to do. We reviewed sADRS described in meta-analyses and web-site materials maintained by regulatory agencies and manufacturers reports (1989 to July 2010; n=2,094). Overall, 28 systematic reviews, six package inserts, three medication guides, four FDA Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Systems (REMS) materials, 16 Summaries of Product Characteristics/Product Assessment Reports were included. For ESAs, common sADRs associated with increased relative risks (RRs) included: mortality among cancer patients with chemotherapy-associated anemia or cancer patients not receiving active treatment (RRs: 1.1–1.2); cerebrovascular and cardiovascular events among chronic kidney disease patients ((RRs: 1.3, 1.9), and venous thromboembolism in the cancer setting (RRs;16-1.7). For G-CSF/pegylated-GCSF, rare instances of myelodysplasia/acute myeloid leukemia (MDS/AML) associated with statistically increased RRs were reported among breast cancer patients receiving chemotherapy in trials reported from one NCI-sponsored clinical trials group, one meta-analysis, and one review of Medicare/SEER databases (RR: 1.9–2.1), although the absolute risks were very small (< 2 per 100,000 treated patients). Other rarely reported sADRs (total N < 20) included splenic rupture following G-CSF stimulation of healthy peripheral blood stem donors. Bone marrow fibrosis and collagen deposition were reported with thrombopoietin receptor agonists, although the implications of this finding is uncertain. Also, instances of VTEs were reported among persons who developed high platelet counts following administration of these thrombopoeitin receptor agonists. SADRs are commonly associated with ESA administration in a range of settings, are uncommon occurrences with G-CSF/pegylated G-CSF, and are not well characterized for thrombopoieitin receptor agonists. Formal pharmacovigilance initiatives are ongoing, including FDA mandated REMS with restricted distribution requirement for ESAs in the cancer setting (APPRISE) and the NEXUS and the PROMACTA CARES programs for thrombopoeitin receptor agonists. ESAs (Cancer) ESAs (CKD) G-CSF/Pegylated G-CSF VTE Mortality Cerebrovascular and CVD AML/MDS RR 1.57 and 1.67 1.10 to 1.17 1.34 and 1.92 2.14 and 1.92 95% CI 1.31–1.87 and 1.35–2.06 1.02–1.20 and 1.06–1.30 1.03–1.74 and 1.38–2.26 1.12–4.08 and 1.19–3.07 Baseline Risk Absolute Risk Common Common Common Rare (2/100,000) Disclosures: Bennett: Pfizer: Consultancy.


2013 ◽  
Vol 13 (9) ◽  
pp. 1438-1443 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maurizio Rupolo ◽  
Arben Lleshi ◽  
Bruno Cacopardo ◽  
Mariagrazia Michieli ◽  
Massimiliano Berretta

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2559-2559
Author(s):  
A. E. Lyons ◽  
L. Balasubramanian ◽  
L. A. Andritsos ◽  
A. Evens ◽  
T. Kuzel ◽  
...  

2559 Background: Pegylated recombinant human megakaryocyte growth and development factor (PEG-rHu-MGDF aka MGDF) and recombinant granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) promote the maturation of hematopoietic progenitor cells. Healthy volunteers/donors have received MGDF in phase I/II clinical trials and G-CSF in allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation procedures. Herein, we review clinical findings for five previously healthy volunteers/donors who developed hematologic malignancies after the use of MGDF or G-CSF. Methods: Clinical information related to hematologic malignancies were reviewed for three volunteers who had participated in a phase I/II clinical trial with MGDF and two donors who underwent G-CSF mobilized peripheral blood stem cell harvesting procedures for sibling allogeneic stem cell transplantation for acute leukemia. Results: Mantle cell, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, and chronic lymphocytic leukemia were diagnosed three to five years after exposure among three volunteers who received MGDF. For one of these patients, autoimmune thrombocytopenia and antibodies to MGDF that cross-reacted with endogenous thrombopoietin had developed shortly after MGDF administration and persisted until lymphoma chemotherapy was administered. Following chemotherapy, all three achieved complete remission, although one patient subsequently relapsed. Acute myelogenous leukemia was diagnosed four to five years after exposure in two donors who underwent G-CSF primed stem cell harvests prior to their siblings’ allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Following intensive chemotherapy, one of these patients died from acute leukemia and the second is now in complete remission. Conclusion: Controversy exists over the appropriateness of administering hematopoietic growth factors to healthy individuals. While a causal relationship with hematologic malignancies is uncertain, long-term follow-up among healthy individuals who receive hematopoietic growth factors is needed. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document