Angina and Its Management

2016 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 199-209 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert A. Kloner ◽  
Bernard Chaitman

Angina pectoris is defined as substernal chest pain, pressure, or discomfort that is typically exacerbated by exertion and/or emotional stress, lasts greater than 30 to 60 seconds, and is relieved by rest and nitroglycerin. There are approximately 10 million people in the United States who have angina, and there are over 500 000 cases diagnosed per year. Several studies now show that angina itself is a predictor of major adverse cardiac events. In addition, angina is a serious morbidity that impedes quality of life and should be treated. In the United States, pharmacologic therapy for angina includes β-blockers, nitrates, calcium channel blockers, and the late sodium current blocker ranolazine. In other countries, additional pharmacologic agents include trimetazidine, ivabradine, nicorandil, fasudil, and others. Revascularization is indicated in certain high-risk individuals and also has been shown to improve angina. However, even after revascularization, a substantial percentage of patients return with recurrent or continued angina, requiring newer and better therapies. Treatment for refractory angina not amenable to usual pharmacologic therapies or revascularization procedures, includes enhanced external counterpulsation, transmyocardial revascularization, and stem cell therapy. Angina continues to be a significant cause of morbidity. Therapy should be geared not only to treating the risk factors for atherosclerotic disease and improving survival but should also be aimed at eliminating or reducing the occurrence of angina and improving the ability of patients to be active.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael E. Johansen ◽  
Joshua D. Niforatos ◽  
Jeremey B. Sussman

AbstractBackgroundAntihypertensives are the most used medication type in the United States, yet there remains uncertainty about the use of different antihypertensives. We sought to characterize use of antihypertensives by and within medication class(es) between 1997-2017.MethodsA repeated cross-sectional study of 493,596 adult individuals using the 1997-2017 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS). The Orange Book and published research were used for adjunctive information. The primary outcome was the estimated use by and within anti-hypertensive medication class(es).ResultsThe proportion of individuals taking any antihypertensive during a year increased from 1997 to the early 2010’s and then remained stable. The proportion of the population taking 2 or more medications declined from 2015-2017. The proportion of adults using angiotensin II receptor-blockers (ARBs) and dihydropyridine calcium channel-blockers (CCBs) increased during the study period, while angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE-Is) increased until 2010 after which rates remained stable. Beta-blocker use was similar to ACE-Is with an earlier decline starting in 2012. Thiazide diuretic use increased from 1997-2007, leveled off until 2014, and declined from 2015-2017. Non-dihydropyridine CCBs use declined throughout the study. ACE-Is, ARBs, CCBs, thiazide diuretics, and loop diuretics all had one dominant in-class medication. There was a clear increase in the use of losartan within ARBs, lisinopril within ACE-Is, and amlodipine within CCBs following generic conversion. Furosemide and hydrochlorothiazide started with and maintained a dominant position in their classes. Metoprolol use increased throughout the study and became the dominant beta-blocker, while atenolol peaked around 2005 and then declined thereafter.ConclusionsAntihypertensive classes appear to have a propensity to equilibrate to an individual medication, despite a lack of outcomes based research to compare medications within a class. Future research could focus on comparative effectiveness for within-class medications early in the life cycle of therapeutics that are probable to have wide spread use.


Stroke ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 51 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Saqib A Chaudhry ◽  
Iqra N Akhtar ◽  
Wei Huang ◽  
Ameer E Hassan ◽  
Mohammad Rauf A Chaudhry ◽  
...  

Background: Carotid revascularization procedure, carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and carotid stent placement (CAS), are some of the most common procedures performed in United States and expected to change due to wider adoption of CAS. We performed this study to determine the changes in utilization of CEA and CAS in United States using nationally representative data. Methods: We used the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) from 2005 to 2014 to assess the changes in utilization of CEA and CAS over last 10 years in patients with symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis. NIS is the largest all payer dataset that includes diagnoses, admissions and discharge, demographics, and outcomes data of patients admitted to short stay non-Federal hospitals in the United States. We analyzed patterns of changes in utilization in various subsets of patients with carotid artery stenosis. Results: A total of 1,186,182 patients underwent carotid revascularization procedures during study period; 1,032,148 (87.1%) and 154,035 (12.9%) were CEA and CAS, respectively. The overall carotid revascularization procedures decreased over last 10 years (11.1% in 2005 to 8.4%in 2014, trend test p <.0001). Carotid revascularization in symptomatic patients increased (7.64% in 2005 to 11.01% in 2014, trend test p <.0001) while it decreased in asymptomatic patients (92.36% in 2006 to 88.99% in 2014, trend test p <.0001). There was an overall decrease in CEA (11.6% in 2005 to 8.3% in 2014, trend test <.0001) while in CAS remained unchanged (8.1% in 2005 to 8.9% in 2014, p=NS). There was an increase in carotid revascularization in teaching hospitals (40.9% in 2005 to 67.1% in 2014, trend test p <.0001) while decrease in non-teaching hospitals (50.9% in 2006 to 27.1% in 2014, trend test p <.0001). There was a decrease in carotid revascularization procedures in patients aged ≥80 years (19.8% in 2005 to 18.7% in 2014, trend test p <.0001) and CEA (19.6% in 2006 to 18.8% in 2014, trend test P<.0001) and CAS (21.2% in 2006 to 18.6% in 2014, trend test p=<.0001). Conclusion: Although CAS is increasing in a disproportionate manner within patient subgroups in United States, overall carotid revascularization procedures have decreased for unclear reasons.


2005 ◽  
Vol 100 (5) ◽  
pp. 1236-1240 ◽  
Author(s):  
Makoto Seki ◽  
Satoshi Kashimoto ◽  
Osamu Nagata ◽  
Hitoshi Yoshioka ◽  
Toshihiko Ishiguro ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Svjetlana Lozo ◽  
Sylvia M Botros

Conservative management of stress urinary incontinence (SUI) is generally offered as first-line treatment. Such treatment options include behavioral therapy, pelvic floor muscle therapy, vaginal devices, pharmacologic therapy, and urethral bulking agents. Weight loss management is an example of an effective behavioral strategy in obese patients. Pelvic floor physical therapy alone or under the supervision of skilled providers can significantly improve SUI; however, long-term effects are harder to maintain. Pessaries, vaginal cones, and vaginal inserts have been widely used for treatment of SUI and are beneficial in patients who are motivated to use them. Currently in the United States, there is no FDA-approved medication for the treatment of SUI. Conversely, the European Union has approved and used duloxetine. Urethral bulking agents are indicated for patients with intrinsic sphincter deficiency and sometimes used in patients who are not able to undergo surgical procedures for SUI or who have failed said procedures. Three materials are currently FDA approved for urethral bulking in the United States. Many options exist for the nonsurgical management of SUI. This review contains 5 tables and 47 references  Key words:  Stress Urinary Incontinence, conservative treatment, urethral bulking, pelvic floor exercises, incontinence pessaries.  


Author(s):  
Louis A. Brunsting ◽  
Averel B. Snyder ◽  
Eric A. Espinal ◽  
Sudhir P. Srivastava

Objective The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility of an endoscopic, optical-fiber-based, laser delivery system (LDS) developed to perform sole-therapy transmyocardial revascularization (TMR) in a totally endoscopic, robotically assisted operation. Methods Forty-two patients were enrolled in a multicenter, prospective, single-arm clinical trial conducted at four US centers between 2005 and 2007. Transmyocardial revascularization was performed completely endoscopically with robotic assistance, introducing the Holmium:Yttrium aluminum garnet (YAG) LDS via a 5-mm port. Completion of the operation endoscopically defined procedural success. Clinical data were recorded before, during, and at least 30 days after the procedure. Results All patients had Canadian Cardiovascular Score angina class IV at baseline. The mean ejection fraction was 49% (range [R], 28–71), the mean age was 59.1 years (R, 36–80), 71% (30/42) were men, 86% (36/42) underwent previous coronary artery bypass grafting surgery, and 76% (32/42) underwent prior coronary stenting. Procedural success was accomplished in 93% (39/42). For the procedural successes, the mean number of TMR channels was 32 (R, 16–50), the median operative time was 88 minutes (R, 48–250 minutes), and the median length of stay postoperatively was 2.5 days (R, 1–10). There was no operative or 30-day mortality, and no patient received any transfusion. At 30 days, freedom from major adverse cardiac events was 95% (two patients had transient congestive heart failure). At the median 6-month follow-up (single-center data, n = 12), the mean (SD) Canadian Cardiovascular Score angina score was 1.3 (0.05) ( P < 0.001 vs baseline). Conclusions Robotically assisted TMR can be performed using an endoscopic, optical-fiber-based LDS, with high procedural success, avoidance of early adverse clinical events, and potential for successful angina relief.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document