scholarly journals The Role of Tinzaparin in Oncology

2017 ◽  
Vol 24 (5) ◽  
pp. 697-707 ◽  
Author(s):  
Evangelos P. Dimakakos ◽  
Ioannis Vathiotis ◽  
Konstantinos Syrigos
Keyword(s):  
Severe Renal Impairment ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonists ◽  
Term Treatment ◽  
Current Data ◽  
Postthrombotic Syndrome ◽  
Minor Bleeding ◽  
Preclinical Research ◽  
Bleeding Events ◽  
Patients With Cancer ◽  
Long Term Treatment

Current guidelines recommend low-molecular-weight heparin treatment in patients with cancer with established venous thromboembolism (VTE). The aim of this article was to study the pharmacological properties and effectiveness of tinzaparin in patients with cancer as well as its potential anticancer properties. A search of PubMed and ScienceDirect databases up to March 2016 was carried out to identify published studies that detect the properties and use of tinzaparin in oncology. Protamine sulfate partially (60% to 65%) neutralized tinzaparin’s anti-Xa activity. No dose adjustment of tinzaparin is needed even in patients with severe renal impairment and Creatinine Clearance ≥20 mL/min. Tinzaparin demonstrated a statistically significant decline in VTE recurrence at 1 year post the index thromboembolic event. A statistically significant reduction in minor bleeding rates was also described, whereas major bleeding events did not decrease in patients with cancer treated with tinzaparin versus those who received vitamin K antagonists. Tinzaparin treatment in patients suffering from deep vein thrombosis reduced the incidence of postthrombotic syndrome and venous ulcers. Tinzaparin’s ability to prevent both metastatic dissemination of cancer cells and tumor angiogenesis has been delineated in preclinical research. Current data show that tinzaparin is safe and efficacious either for short-term or for long-term treatment of VTE in patients with cancer. Clinical trials are needed in order to examine the utility of tinzaparin in primary prevention of VTE and validate its potential anticancer advantages exhibited in preclinical research.

scholarly journals Rivaroxaban for the treatment of cerebral venous thrombosis

BMC Neurology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sara Esmaeili ◽  
Meysam Abolmaali ◽  
Sobhan Aarabi ◽  
Mohammad Reza Motamed ◽  
Samira Chaibakhsh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Venous Thrombosis ◽  
Cerebral Venous Thrombosis ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonists ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Bleeding Risk ◽  
Term Treatment ◽  
Background Information ◽  
Minor Bleeding ◽  
Long Term Treatment ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Background New Oral Anticoagulants (NOACs) such as Rivaroxaban are introduced as alternatives to conventional vitamin-K antagonists in the long-term treatment of thrombotic events due to their lower bleeding risk. There is a lack of evidence on the effectiveness and safety of Rivaroxaban in Cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT). This study aims to assess the effectiveness and bleeding risk of Rivaroxaban in comparison with Warfarin for the treatment of CVT. Materials and methods 36 patients with diagnosis of CVT were included. Clinical and background information was assessed on admission and patients were followed for at least 12 months. Measured outcomes were modified Rankin Scale (mRS), evidence of recanalization on contrast-enhanced Brain MR venography (MRV) and major or minor bleeding. Patients were divided into two groups according to the type of oral anticoagulant (Rivaroxaban vs Warfarin). Groups were compared in terms of final outcomes and side effects. Result Overall, 13 (36.11%) patients received Warfarin and 23 (63.89%) received Rivaroxaban. Optimal mRS score (0–1) was attained in 9 of 10 (90%) of patients treated with Rivaroxaban and 19 of 22 (86.36%) of patients received Warfarin. MRV showed complete or partial recanalization in 12 of 14 (85.71%) patients treated with Rivaroxaban and all patients in the Warfarin group. There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of major and minor hemorrhage. Conclusion Rivaroxaban holds promise for the treatment of CVT.

A worldwide survey to assess the current approach to the treatment of patients with cancer and venous thromboembolism

2013 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 959-965 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anita Aggarwal ◽  
Annemarie van de Geer ◽  
Charles Faselis ◽  
Harry R. Büller ◽  
Marcello Di Nisio ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonists ◽  
Term Treatment ◽  
Current Approach ◽  
Survey Tool ◽  
General Internal ◽  
Patients With Cancer ◽  
First Choice ◽  
Long Term Treatment

SummaryLow-molecular-weight heparin (LWMH) is recommended as the preferred anticoagulant treatment over vitamin K antagonists (VKA) for venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with cancer. However, there is uncertainty about the duration and dose of LMWH treatment. Therefore, we designed this multinational survey to assess the current approach to the treatment of patients with cancer and VTE. An electronic survey tool was used to disseminate a survey containing 49 questions on different aspects of the treatment of patients with cancer and VTE, among both thrombosis and non-thrombosis specialists. A total of 229 invitations were sent, and 141 completed the survey (60% of the total). Fifty-eight percent of the respondents were from Europe, 35% from the US and the remaining 7% from other countries. Respondent’s specialties included haematology (23%), oncology (18%), pulmonology (15%) and general internal medicine (15%). LMWH was indicated as the first choice for the long-term treatment by 82% of the respondents, of whom 60% used full therapeutic doses and 40% chose a dose reduction. When continuing anticoagulants after the long-term treatment period, 44% of respondents preferred LMWH, 10% VKA, while the remaining 45% chose per individual patient for either LMWH or VKA. In conclusion, we observed a relatively high observance rate of the guidelines with respect to the use of LMWH for the long-term treatment of VTE in cancer. In contrast, the dose of LMWH and the type of anticoagulant chosen after the initial 3–12 months varied substantially, probably reflecting the limited available evidence.

scholarly journals The international normalized ratio (INR) as seen in a population of patients with atrial fibrillation and cerebral infarction undergoing long-term treatment with vitamin K antagonists

2015 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. 269-272
Author(s):  
Anna Szczepańska-Szerej ◽  
Magdalena Wojtan ◽  
Beata Szajnoga
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Cerebral Infarction ◽  
Vitamin K ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonists ◽  
International Normalized Ratio ◽  
Blood Parameters ◽  
Term Treatment ◽  
Adequate Treatment ◽  
Long Term Treatment

Abstract It is estimated that nearly 20% of all cerebral infarctions in the total population are the result of a complication of atrial fibrillation (AF). While oral anticoagulation with vitamin K antagonists (AVKs) substantially reduces this risk, this requires regular monitoring of the international normalized ratio (INR) in order to achieve therapeutic levels (2,0-3,0). The aim of this study was to evaluate a group at high risk of cerebral infarction, among patients with AF undergoing long-term treatment with VKAs, taking into account the significance of therapeutic INR values. The analysed group consisted of 90 acute ischaemic stroke patients with paroxysmal or chronic “non-valvular” AF, receiving treatment with VKAs. As a result of the study, therapeutic INR values (≥ 2) were seen in thirty-five of these individuals (38,8%), while 55 (61,2%) showed non-therapeutic INR values. Moreover, there were no differences in demographics, vascular risk factors, biochemical and morphological blood parameters, mean CHA2DS2-VASc score and TOAST classification between either of the two groups. Furthermore, no additional factor that would increase their risk of cerebral infarction during the adequate treatment with VKAs was found. However, patients with non-therapeutic INR values had a statistically significantly higher frequency of concomitant moderate pathology of the bicuspid valve, p<0.05. Hence, a lack of proper control of INR can proved to be particularly dangerous for this subgroup of patients. Hence, this is a group with an elevated risk of cerebral infarction and therefore requires special oversight of VKA treatment or NOA treatment.

scholarly journals Tinzaparin in Cancer and Renal Impairment: A Systematic Review Focusing on Safety

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ioannis Vathiotis ◽  
Nikolaos Syrigos ◽  
Evangelos Dimakakos
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Renal Impairment ◽  
Creatinine Clearance ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Severe Renal Impairment ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonists ◽  
Bleeding Events ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Therapeutic Doses

Abstract Purpose: Low-molecular-weight heparins are approved for primary and secondary venous thromboembolism prevention. The purpose of this systematic review is to provide an update regarding the safety profile of tinzaparin sodium, prescribed either as a prophylactic or as a therapeutic regimen for VTE in cancer patients and individuals suffering from renal impairment. Method: We identified and studied clinical studies from 2000 until 2020, reporting safety outcomes for cancer patients and individuals with renal impairment receiving either prophylactic or therapeutic doses of tinzaparin. Results: In patients with cancer major bleeding rates fluctuate between 0.8% and 7%; reported major bleeding rates for non-cancer patients with renal impairment on prophylactic tinzaparin regimens were 0%. Non-cancer patients on therapeutic tinzaparin regimens exhibited major bleeding in 0 to 2.3% of cases; major bleeding rates were higher for cancer patients with renal impairment receiving therapeutic doses of tinzaparin (4.3 to 10%). Patients on tinzaparin exhibit significantly lower rates of clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding events in comparison with those on vitamin K antagonists. Bioaccumulation of tinzaparin is not correlated with age, body weight or creatinine clearance. Periodic administration of either prophylactic or therapeutic doses of tinzaparin does not result in bioaccumulation, even in patients with severe renal impairment and creatinine clearance < 20 ml/min. Conclusion: Tinzaparin is safe and can be used without dose adjustment in patients with severe renal impairment and creatinine clearance > 20 ml/min. Tinzaparin represents a thoroughly studied and safe choice for special populations at increased risk for thrombosis and bleeding.

P690Incidence of events between vitamin K antagonists and direct oral anticoagulants in patients with cancer

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
A Pardo Sanz ◽  
L M Rincon ◽  
G De Lara ◽  
A Tamayo ◽  
L C Belarte ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Vitamin K ◽  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonists ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Bleeding Risk ◽  
Systemic Embolism ◽  
Bleeding Events ◽  
Patients With Cancer

Abstract Background Balance between embolic and bleeding risk is challenging in patients with cancer. There is a lack of specific recommendations for the use of antithrombotic therapy in oncologic patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) within patients with breast cancer. We also compared the embolic and bleeding risk, the preventive management and the incidence of events between patients with and without cancer. Methods It is an ambispective observational multicentric study that analysed patients with non-valvular AF treated in Oncology and Cardiology Departments in Spain in the period 2011–2018. A total of 1237 female patients with AF were enrolled: 637 with breast cancer and 599 without cancer. The incidence of thromboembolic and major bleeding events according to the antithrombotic strategy with VKAs or DOACs was evaluated in the cohort of 637 patients with cancer. Analysis were conducted using SPSS software V.22.0 and R V.3.5.1, with a two-tailed significance value of 0.05. Results Mean follow-up was 3.1 years. Both groups were similar in age, CHA2DS2-VASc and HASB-LED scores. There was no evidence that the incidence of ischemic stroke/systemic embolism differed between patients with cancer treated with AVK and DOAC after CHA2DS2-VASc adjustment: HR 0.91 (95% CI, 0.42–1.99). In addition, no significant differences in the incidence of major bleeding events were found between DOACs and VKA after adjustment for HAS-BLED score: HR 1.53 (95% CI, 0.93–2.53) (Figure 3). Gastrointestinal bleeding was the main source of haemorrhages in both groups (45% of bleedings among patients treated with DOACs and, 37% in VKAs group). Metastatic disease or active chemotherapy were studied as potential covariates but none of them posed any relevant change in the result. Kaplan-Meier analysis Conclusions Cancer patients treated with DOACs did not differ versus those treated with VKAs with regards to stroke or systemic embolism in a model adjusted for CHA2DS2-VASc. Neither significant differences were found for bleeding events in a model adjusted for baseline HASBLED.

P675Current status of anticoagulation in patients with breast cancer and atrial fibrillation

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
A Pardo Sanz ◽  
L M Rincon ◽  
P Guedes Ramallo ◽  
L Belarte ◽  
G De Lara ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonists ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Bleeding Risk ◽  
Bleeding Events ◽  
Patients With Cancer ◽  
Oncologic Patients

Abstract Aims Balance between embolic and bleeding risk is challenging in patients with cancer. There is a lack of specific recommendations for the use of antithrombotic therapy in oncologic patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). We compared the embolic and bleeding risk, the preventive management and the incidence of events between patients with and without cancer. We further evaluated the effectiveness and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) within patients with cancer. Methods The AMBER-AF registry is an observational multicentre study that analysed patients with non-valvular AF treated in Oncology and Cardiology Departments in Spain. 1237 female patients with AF were enrolled: 637 with breast cancer and 599 without cancer. Mean follow-up was 3.1 years. Results Both groups were similar in age, CHA2DS2-VASc and HASB-LED scores. Lack of guidelines recommended therapies was more frequent among patients with cancer. Compared with patients without cancer, adjusted rates of stroke (hazard ratio [95% confidence interval]) in cancer patients were higher (1.56 [1.04–2.35]), whereas bleeding rates remained similar (1.25 [0.95–1.64]). Within the group of patients with cancer, the use of DOACs vs VKAs did not entail differences in the adjusted rates of stroke (0.91 [0.42–1.99]) or severe bleedings (1.53 [0.93–2.53]). Follow-up events Conclusions Antithrombotic management of AF frequently differs in patients with breast cancer. While breast cancer is associated with a higher risk of incident stroke, bleeding events remained similar. Patients with cancer treated with DOACs experienced similar rates of stroke and bleeding as those with VKAs.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document