scholarly journals Efficacy and Safety of a Biosimilar Versus Branded Enoxaparin in the Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism Following Major Abdominal Surgery: A Randomized, Prospective, Single-Blinded, Multicenter Clinical Trial

2018 ◽  
Vol 24 (8) ◽  
pp. 1208-1215 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eduardo Ramacciotti ◽  
Ubirajara Ferreira ◽  
Agenor José Vasconcelos Costa ◽  
Selma Regina O. Raymundo ◽  
João Antônio Correa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
At Risk ◽  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Abdominal Surgery ◽  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Absolute Risk ◽  
Risk Difference ◽  
Major Abdominal Surgery ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Efficacy Outcome ◽  
Clinically Significant

Several biosimilar versions of enoxaparin are already approved and in use globally. Analytical characterization can establish good quality control in manufacturing, but they may not assure similarity in clinical outcomes between biosimilar and branded enoxaparin. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of biosimilar Cristália versus branded Sanofi enoxaparin in venous thromboembolism (VTE) prevention in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery at risk for VTE. In this randomized, prospective single-blind study, we compared Cristália enoxaparin (Ce), a biosimilar version, versus branded Sanofi enoxaparin (Se; at a dose of 40 mg subcutaneously per day postoperatively from 7 to 10 days) in 243 patients submitted to major abdominal surgery at risk for VTE for VTE prevention. The primary efficacy outcome was occurrence of VTE or death related to VTE. The principal safety outcomes were a combination of major bleeding and clinically relevant non-major bleeding. Bilateral duplex scanning of the legs was performed from days 10 to 14, and follow-ups were performed up to 60 days after surgery. The incidence of VTE was 4.9% in the Cristália group and 1.1% in the Sanofi group (absolute risk difference = 3.80%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: −1.4%-9.0%) yielding noninferiority since the 95% CI does not reach the prespecified value Δ = 20%. Clinically significant bleeding occurred in 9.9% in the Cristália group and in 5.5% in the Sanofi group (n.s. ). In conclusion, this study suggests that 40 mg once daily of Ce, a biosimilar enoxaparin, is as effective and safe as the branded Sanofi enoxaparin in the prophylaxis of VTE in patients submitted to major abdominal surgery at risk for VTE.

Apixaban and Dalteparin for the Treatment of Venous Thromboembolism in Patients with Different Sites of Cancer

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giancarlo Agnelli ◽  
Andrés Muñoz ◽  
Laura Franco ◽  
Isabelle Mahé ◽  
Benjamin Brenner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Gastrointestinal Cancer ◽  
Absolute Risk ◽  
Gynecological Cancer ◽  
Risk Difference ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Patients With Cancer ◽  
Genitourinary Cancer ◽  
Spectrum Of Patients

AbstractEfficacy and safety of anticoagulant treatment for venous thromboembolism (VTE) may vary in patients with different cancer sites. We evaluated the rates of VTE recurrence and major bleeding and the relative efficacy and safety of 6-month treatment with oral apixaban or subcutaneous dalteparin in patients with different cancer sites randomized in the Caravaggio study. Primary cancer was located at gastrointestinal sites in 375 patients (32.5%), lung in 200 (17.3%), breast in 155 (13.4%), genitourinary sites in 139 (12%), gynecological sites in 119 (10.3%), and was hematological in 85 patients (7.4%). Rates of VTE recurrence were 10.9% in patients with gynecological, 8.8% with gastrointestinal, 6.5% with genitourinary, and 5.5% with lung cancer with lower rates in the other sites of cancer. Rates of major bleeding were 7.2% in patients with genitourinary and 4.8% with gastrointestinal cancer, with lower rates in patients with other sites of cancer. The observed absolute risk difference in VTE recurrence in favor of apixaban was 11.9% in patients with gynecological, 5.5% with lung, 3.7% with genitourinary cancer, and 0.6% with gastrointestinal cancer. None of the risk differences was statistically significant. The rates of major bleeding in patients treated with apixaban or dalteparin was similar across patients with different cancer sites. In conclusion, recurrences appear to be more common in patients with gastrointestinal and gynecological cancer and major bleedings in patients with genitourinary and gastrointestinal cancer. Oral apixaban is a valid oral alternative to subcutaneous dalteparin for the treatment of a large spectrum of patients with cancer-associated VTE.

Oral Rivaroxaban for the Treatment of Symptomatic Venous Thromboembolism: A Pooled Analysis of the EINSTEIN DVT and EINSTEIN PE Studies

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 20-20 ◽  
Author(s):  
Harry Roger Buller
Keyword(s):  
Body Weight ◽  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Standard Therapy ◽  
Pooled Analysis ◽  
Fixed Dose ◽  
Primary Efficacy ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Efficacy Outcome ◽  
Subgroup Analyses

Abstract Abstract 20 Harry R. Büller, MD, PhD on behalf of the EINSTEIN Investigators. Background The EINSTEIN DVT and EINSTEIN PE studies showed that a fixed-dose regimen of rivaroxaban was non-inferior to standard therapy of subcutaneous enoxaparin followed by vitamin K antagonist (VKA) for the treatment of symptomatic deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE), with similar occurrence of clinically relevant bleeding (The EINSTEIN Investigators. N Engl J Med 2010;363:2499–510; The EINSTEIN–PE Investigators. N Engl J Med 2012;366:1287–97). This prespecified pooled analysis compared rivaroxaban with the standard therapy for the primary efficacy and safety outcomes, including subgroup analyses for body weight, age, and renal function. Methods This data pool included all patients and events from EINSTEIN DVT (patients with acute symptomatic DVT without PE) and EINSTEIN PE (patients with acute symptomatic PE with or without DVT). Both studies shared an open-label, randomized, non-inferiority design and compared oral, fixed-dose rivaroxaban alone (15 mg twice daily for 3 weeks, followed by 20 mg once daily) with subcutaneous body weight-adjusted enoxaparin followed by warfarin or acenocoumarol (international normalized ratio 2–3) for 3, 6, or 12 months. The primary efficacy outcome was symptomatic recurrent venous thromboembolism (the composite of recurrent DVT or nonfatal or fatal PE); safety outcomes included the composite of major and clinically relevant non-major bleeding, and major bleeding alone. Adjudication was done by a single committee. Subgroup analyses for efficacy and safety were performed. Results The intention-to-treat population included 4150 rivaroxaban patients and 4131 enoxaparin/VKA patients. Rivaroxaban demonstrated non-inferior efficacy to enoxaparin/VKA for the primary efficacy outcome (rivaroxaban: 86 events [2.1%], enoxaparin/VKA: 95 events [2.3%]; hazard ratio [HR] 0.89; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.66–1.19; p<0.0001 for non-inferiority). Major and clinically relevant non-major bleeding occurred in 388 patients (9.4%) in the rivaroxaban group and 412 patients (10.0%) in the enoxaparin/VKA group (HR=0.93; 95% CI 0.81–1.06; p=0.272), and major bleeding occurred in 40 (1.0%, 3 fatal) and 72 (1.7%, 8 fatal) of the rivaroxaban and enoxaparin/VKA recipients, respectively (HR=0.54; 95% CI 0.37–0.79; p=0.002). Efficacy was consistent for rivaroxaban compared with enoxaparin/VKA among the various subgroups, whereas increasing age and declining renal function were associated with a strong reduction in major bleeding in favor of rivaroxaban (Table). Major bleeding was consistently lower in the rivaroxaban recipients for all body weight categories. Conclusion This analysis demonstrates that the simple, single-drug approach with oral rivaroxaban has an improved benefit–risk profile compared with standard therapy for the treatment of symptomatic venous thromboembolism. The reduction in major bleeding in favor of rivaroxaban was most pronounced in elderly patients and those with moderate renal impairment (creatinine clearance <50 mL/min), and was consistent among various body weight categories, thereby obviating the need for a rivaroxaban dose adjustment in these subgroups. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Fondaparinux Combined with Intermittent Pneumatic Compression (IPC) Versus IPC Alone in the Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism after Major Abdominal Surgery: The Randomized APOLLO Study.

Blood ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 106 (11) ◽  
pp. 279-279 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander G.G. Turpie ◽  
Kenneth A. Bauer ◽  
Joseph A. Caprini ◽  
Philip P. Comp ◽  
Michael Gent ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Deep Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Abdominal Surgery ◽  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Intermittent Pneumatic Compression ◽  
Major Abdominal Surgery ◽  
Bleeding Events ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Deep Vein

Abstract Background: The selective factor Xa inhibitor fondaparinux has been shown to be at least as effective and as safe as the low-molecular-weight heparin dalteparin for venous thromboembolism (VTE) prevention after major abdominal surgery (Agnelli GA, et al. Br J Surg, 2005, In press). The benefit of fondaparinux in addition to intermittent pneumatic compression (IPC) in VTE prevention after abdominal surgery has not been evaluated. Objective: We performed a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, superiority trial to compare the efficacy and safety of fondaparinux in conjunction with IPC versus IPC alone in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery. Methods: Patients aged at least 40 years undergoing abdominal surgery of at least 45 minutes were included. Patients at highest risk of VTE, requiring pharmacologic prophylaxis in addition to IPC were excluded at the investigator’s discretion. Patients were randomized to receive either fondaparinux 2.5 mg or placebo once daily subcutaneously for 5 to 9 days, starting 6 to 8 hours postoperatively. All patients received IPC. The primary efficacy outcome was the composite of deep-vein thrombosis detected by mandatory bilateral venography, or documented symptomatic deep-vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism up to day 10. The main safety outcome was major bleeding during the treatment period. A blinded independent committee adjudicated all these outcomes. Follow-up lasted 32 days. Results: Of the 1309 patients randomized between November 2001 and October 2004 (fondaparinux+IPC, n=650; placebo+IPC, n=659), 842 (64.3%) were evaluable for efficacy. The treatment groups were comparable with regard to VTE risk factors, demographic and surgical characteristics; 82% had at least one VTE risk factor (over and above being at least 40 years old and undergoing abdominal surgery). Fondaparinux significantly reduced the VTE rate from 5.3% (22/418) with placebo to 1.7% (7/424), an odds ratio reduction of 69.8% (95% CI: 27.9 to 87.3; p=0.004). Similarly, fondaparinux significantly reduced the proximal deep-vein thrombosis rate from 1.7% (7/417) to 0.2% (1/423; p=0.037). Major bleeding occurred in 1.6% (10/635) and 0.2% (1/650) of fondaparinux- and placebo-treated patients, respectively (p=0.006). None of the bleeding events were fatal or involved a critical organ. Conclusions: Fondaparinux combined with IPC was significantly more effective than IPC alone for VTE prevention after major abdominal surgery. Although the bleeding risk was increased with fondaparinux compared with placebo, this risk was low and consistent with that observed in previous fondaparinux studies in surgical patients.

scholarly journals Safety and efficacy of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) vs low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) in malignancy induced venous thromboembolism-a systematic review and meta analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
A Abdul Razzack ◽  
N Hussain ◽  
S Adeel Hassan ◽  
S Mandava ◽  
F Yasmin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Molecular Weight ◽  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Low Molecular Weight Heparin ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Low Molecular Weight ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Dichotomous Data ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Background- Low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) and direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have been proven to be more effective in the management of venous thromboembolism (MVTE). The efficacy and safety of LMWH or DOACs in treatment of recurrent or malignancy induced VTE is not studied in literature. Objective To compare the efficacy and safety of LMWH and  DOACs in the management of malignancy induced  VTE Methods- Electronic databases ( PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane) were searched from inception to November  28th, 2020. Dichotomous data was extracted for prevention of VTE and risk of major bleeding in patients taking either LMWH or DOACs. Unadjusted odds ratios (OR) were calculated from dichotomous data using Mantel Haenszel (M-H) random-effects with statistical significance to be considered if the confidence interval excludes 1 and p &lt; 0.05.  Results- Three studies with 2607 patients (DOACs n = 1301 ; LMWH n = 1306) were included in analysis. All the study population had active cancer of any kind diagnosed within the past 6 months. Average follow-up period for each trial was 6 months. Patients receiving DOACs have a lower odds of recurrence of MVTE as compared to LMWH( OR 1.56; 95% CI 1.17-2.09; P = 0.003, I2 = 0). There was no significant difference in major bleeding among patients receiving LMWH or DOACs  (OR-0.71, 95%CI 0.46-1.10, P = 0.13, I2 = 22%) (Figure 1). We had no publication bias in our results (Egger’s regression p &gt; 0.05). Conclusion- DOACs are superior to LMWH in prevention of MVTE and have similar major bleeding risk as that of LMWH. Abstract Figure. A)VTE Recurrence B)Major Bleeding events

Prevention of venous thromboembolism after major abdominal surgery

The Lancet ◽  
1993 ◽  
Vol 341 (8848) ◽  
pp. 823-825
Author(s):  
M.A. Mcnally ◽  
W.G. Kernohan ◽  
J.G. Brown ◽  
M.D. Laverick ◽  
R.A.B. Mollan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Abdominal Surgery ◽  
Major Abdominal Surgery

scholarly journals The Safety and Efficacy of Full Versus Reduced Dose Betrixaban in the Acute Medically Ill VTE (Venous Thromboembolism) Prevention with Extended Duration Betrixaban (APEX) Trial

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 3824-3824
Author(s):  
Alexander T Cohen ◽  
Rim Halaby ◽  
Serge Korjian ◽  
Yazan Daaboul ◽  
Donald Szlosek ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Primary Analysis ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Medically Ill ◽  
Reduced Dose ◽  
Efficacy Outcome ◽  
Venous Thromboembolism Prevention ◽  
Extended Duration

Abstract Background: The exposure of all the currently licenced DOACs is increased in renal impairment and by certain drug interactions. The Acute Medically Ill VTE (Venous Thromboembolism) Prevention with Extended Duration Betrixaban (APEX) trial assessed the safety and efficacy of extended-duration thromboprophylaxis using betrixaban versus standard dosing of enoxaparin among acutely ill medical patients. The full 80 mg dose of betrixaban was halved to 40 mg among subjects with severe renal insufficiency (calculated creatinine clearance <30ml/min), or receiving a concomitant strong P-glycoprotein (P-gp) inhibitor. Objectives and Methods: The goal of this analysis is to assess the efficacy and safety of full (80 mg) and reduced dose (40 mg) betrixaban relative to enoxaparin in the APEX trial. Subjects were stratified into the two dose groups prior to randomization according to the pre-specified dosing criteria. The primary efficacy outcome was the composite of asymptomatic proximal and symptomatic venous thromboembolism (proximal or distal deep-vein thrombosis, symptomatic nonfatal pulmonary embolism, or death from venous thromboembolism). The principal safety outcome was major bleeding. Results: The median concentration of betrixaban among subjects administered the 80 mg dose was higher than that of the 40 mg dose (19 ng/ml vs 11 ng/ml, p<0.0001). In the primary analysis Cohort 1 (the elevated D-dimer +ve patients), the primary efficacy outcome was significantly reduced among subjects treated with 80 mg of extended dose betrixaban vs enoxaparin [6.3% (95/1516) vs 8.4% (130/1549), RRR = 0.26 (0.04-0.42), p=0.023]. A similar reduction was observed in the entire modified Intention to Treat (mITT) population [4.87% (122/2506) vs 7.06% (181/2562), RRR = 0.30 (0.13 - 0.44), p=0.001]. In contrast, among subjects receiving 40 mg of betrixaban there was no significant difference in the primary outcomes compared with enoxaparin across Cohorts 1, 2, and 3. There was no excess of major bleeding associated with administration of either the full 80 mg dose or the reduced 40 mg dose of betrixaban as compared with enoxaparin. Conclusion: For extended duration prophylaxis against VTE in hospitalized medically ill patients, the full 80 mg dose of extended duration betrixaban achieves higher serum concentrations than the 40 mg dose and is associated with improved efficacy across all cohorts relative to standard dose enoxaparin, without an excess risk of major bleeding. Based upon the approximate halving of plasma concentrations in this analysis and the lack of improvement in clinical outcomes, the reduced 40 mg dose may have been excessively downwardly adjusted. Conversely, the 80 mg dose was efficacious in all cohorts, including cohort 1. The inclusion of the 40 mg dose in the primary analysis may explain at least in part the marginal statistical result in the original report. Disclosures Cohen: Takeda: Consultancy; Medscape: Speakers Bureau; XO1: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Portola: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; NHS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Lifeblood: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Department of Health: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Bayer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy; Aspen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Boehringer Ingelheim: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Colation to Prevent Venous Thromboembolism: Other: Founder; Leo Pharma: Consultancy; UK Government Health Select Committee: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Johnson & Johnson: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; ONO: Consultancy, Honoraria. Goldhaber:Portola: Consultancy. Hull:Portola: Consultancy. Hernandez:Portola: Consultancy. Gold:Portola Pharmaceuticals: Employment. Wiens:Portola: Employment, Equity Ownership. Harrington:Portola: Consultancy. Gibson:Portola: Consultancy.

3054Efficacy and safety of non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation and cancer

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
I Cavallari ◽  
G Verolino ◽  
G Patti
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Intracranial Hemorrhage ◽  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Systemic Embolism ◽  
Patients With Cancer ◽  
All Cause Mortality

Abstract Background Anticoagulation in patients with cancer and atrial fibrillation (AF) is particularly challenging given the higher risk of both thrombotic and bleeding complications in this setting. Data regarding the efficacy and safety of non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs) in AF patients with malignancy remain unclear. Purpose In the present meta-analysis we further investigate the efficacy and safety of NOACs compared to warfarin in patients with AF and cancer assuming that available studies may be individually underpowered for endpoints at low incidence, i.e. stroke, major and intracranial bleeding. Methods We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing the use of NOACs vs. warfarin in AF patients with cancer. Efficacy outcome measures included stroke or systemic embolism, venous thromboembolism and mortality. Safety outcome measures were major bleeding and intracranial hemorrhage. Results We pooled data from 6 identified studies enrolling a total of 31,756 AF patients with cancer. Mean follow-up was 1.7 years. Patients with cancer had significantly increased annualized rates of venous thromboembolism (1.38% vs. 0.74%), major bleeding (9.01% vs. 5.13%), in particular major gastrointestinal bleeding (2.38% vs. 1.60%), and all-cause mortality (17.73% vs. 8.50%) vs. those without (all P values <0.001), whereas the incidence of stroke or systemic embolism and intracranial hemorrhage did not differ. Compared with warfarin, treatment with NOACs nominally decreased the risk of stroke or systemic embolism (5.41% vs. 2.70%; odds ratio, OR; 95% confidence intervals, CI 0.51, 0.26–1.01; P=0.05; Figure), mainly of ischemic stroke (OR 0.56; 95% CI 0.35–0.89; P=0.01), and the risk of venous thromboembolism (OR 0.51; 95% CI 0.42–0.61; P<0.001). In cancer patients receiving NOACs there was a significant reduction of major bleeding (3.95% vs. 4.66%; OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.46–0.94; P=0.02; Figure) and intracranial hemorrhage (0.26% vs. 0.66%; OR 0.25, 95% CI 0.08–0.82; P=0.02) vs. warfarin, with no difference in gastrointestinal major bleeding rates. Conclusion AF patients on oral anticoagulation and concomitant cancer are at higher risk of venous thromboembolism, major bleeding and all-cause mortality. NOACs may represent a safer and more effective alternative to warfarin also in this setting of patients.

scholarly journals Outpatient Management in Patients with Venous Thromboembolism with Edoxaban: A Post Hoc Analysis of the Hokusai-VTE Study

2017 ◽  
Vol 117 (12) ◽  
pp. 2406-2414 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andria Medina ◽  
Gary Raskob ◽  
Walter Ageno ◽  
Alexander Cohen ◽  
Marjolein Brekelmans ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Similar Efficacy ◽  
Initial Therapy ◽  
Risk Difference ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Safety Outcome ◽  
Recurrent Vte

AbstractDirect oral anticoagulants (DOACs) facilitate the outpatient treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE). However, the pivotal trials of DOACs have not reported outcomes separately for patients managed either as outpatients or in the hospital. We performed a subgroup analysis of the Hokusai-VTE study comparing efficacy and safety of edoxaban with warfarin in 8,292 patients with acute VTE. Patients received initial therapy with open-label enoxaparin or unfractionated heparin for ≥5 days in the hospital or as an outpatient at the discretion of the treating physician. Edoxaban or warfarin was then given for 3 to 12 months. The primary efficacy outcome was the cumulative incidence of symptomatic recurrent VTE at 12 months. The principal safety outcome was the incidence of clinically relevant bleeding (composite of major or clinically relevant non-major bleeding). Of the 5,223 consecutively enrolled patients with recorded hospital status and length of stay, 1,414 patients (27.1%) were managed as outpatients and 3,809 were managed in hospital. Among the outpatients, initial presentation was symptomatic deep-vein thrombosis (DVT) in 1,183 patients (83.7%) and pulmonary embolism (PE) in 231 patients (16.3%). Among the outpatients with DVT, recurrent VTE occurred in 18 (3.0%) given edoxaban and in 21 (3.6%) given warfarin (risk difference: −0.61, 95% confidence interval [CI]: −2.6 to 1.4). The principal safety outcome in outpatients occurred in 46 edoxaban patients (7.7%) and in 48 warfarin patients (8.3%; risk difference: −0.59, 95% CI: −3.7 to 2.5). Most outpatients had symptomatic DVT at presentation. In these patients, initial heparin followed by edoxaban had similar efficacy and safety to standard therapy with heparin and warfarin.

Efficacy and Safety of Edoxaban Versus Enoxaparin for the Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism Following Total Hip Arthroplasty: STARS J-V trial

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 3320-3320 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takeshi Fuji ◽  
Satoru Fujita ◽  
Shintaro Tachibana ◽  
Yohko Kawai ◽  
Yukihiro Koretsune ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Thromboembolic Events ◽  
Primary Efficacy ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Bleeding Events ◽  
Primary Efficacy Outcome ◽  
Treatment Groups ◽  
Efficacy Outcome ◽  
Lead Investigator

Abstract Abstract 3320 Introduction: Edoxaban is an oral, direct factor Xa inhibitor in clinical development for the prevention and treatment of thromboembolic events. The aim of this non-inferiority trial was to determine the efficacy and safety of edoxaban compared with enoxaparin sodium (enoxaparin) after total hip arthroplasty (THA) in Japan. Methods: This was a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, enoxaparin-controlled, multicenter trial. Patients were randomized to oral edoxaban 30 mg once daily (QD) or subcutaneous enoxaparin 2,000 IU, equivalent to 20 mg, twice daily (BID) for 11 to 14 days. Edoxaban was initiated 6–24 hours after surgery and enoxaparin was initiated 24–36 hours after surgery which is the Japanese standard of care. The primary efficacy outcome was the composite of symptomatic and asymptomatic deep vein thrombosis (DVT), and pulmonary embolism (PE). The primary safety outcome was the incidence of major and clinically relevant non-major bleeding. Results: A total of 610 patients were randomized. There were no clinically relevant differences in baseline characteristics between the treatment groups. The mean age was 62.8 years and mean body weight was 57.4 kg (Efficacy analysis set). The primary efficacy outcome occurred in 6 of 255 (2.4%) patients receiving edoxaban and 17 of 248 (6.9%) patients receiving enoxaparin (relative risk reduction=65.7%; absolute risk difference -4.5%, 95% CI, -8.6% to -0.9%; P<0.001 for non-inferiority; P=0.0157 for superiority). The thromboembolic events were all asymptomatic DVT (Table). No symptomatic DVT or PE was observed in both treatment groups. The incidence of major and clinically relevant non-major bleeding events was 2.6% (8/303) vs 3.7% (11/301) in the edoxaban and enoxaparin groups, respectively (P=0.475). Major bleeding occurred in 0.7% of the edoxaban group and 2.0% of the enoxaparin group. The rates of elevated serum aminotransferase levels of more than 3 times the upper limit of normal was 2.6% with edoxaban versus 10% with enoxaparin. Conclusions: The STARS J-V trial demonstrated that oral edoxaban 30 mg QD has efficacy superior to enoxaparin 2,000 IU BID in the prevention of thromboembolic events following THA and is associated with a similar incidence of major and clinically relevant non-major bleeding events. Disclosures: Fuji: Astellas: Consultancy; Showa Ikakogyo: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Bayer: Consultancy. Fujita:Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Astellas: Consultancy; GlaxoSmithkline: Consultancy. Tachibana:Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy. Kawai:Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Toyama Chemical: Consultancy. Koretsune:Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, National Lead Investigator. Yamashita:Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, National Lead Investigator; Otsuka Pharmaceutical: Paid instructor; Sanofi-aventis: Paid instructor; Teijin Pharma: Paid instructor. Nakamura:Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; GlaxoSmithkline: Consultancy; Astellas: Consultancy.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document