scholarly journals Redeployment of ophthalmologists in the United Kingdom during the Coronavirus Disease Pandemic

2020 ◽  
pp. 112067212095333 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christina Lim ◽  
Ian De Silva ◽  
George Moussa ◽  
Tahir Islam ◽  
Lina Osman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
United Kingdom ◽  
National Health Service ◽  
Health Service ◽  
Personal Protection ◽  
Prior Training ◽  
Personal Protection Equipment ◽  
The United Kingdom ◽  
The Uk ◽  
Good Support

Background: During the current coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, some ophthalmologists across the United Kingdom (UK) have been redeployed to areas of need across the National Health Service (NHS). This survey was performed to assess aspects of this process including training & education, tasks expected, availability of personal protection equipment (PPE) used and the overall anxiety of ophthalmologists around their redeployment. Method: Online anonymous survey around the existing guidance on safe redeployment of secondary care NHS staff and PPE use by NHS England and Public Health England respectively. The survey was open to all ophthalmologists across the UK irrespective of their redeployment status. Findings: 145 surveys were completed and returned during a 2-week period between 17th April 2020 and 1st May 2020, when 52% of ophthalmologists were redeployed. The majority of this group consisted of ophthalmologists in training (79%). 81% of those redeployed were assigned to areas of the hospital where patients with confirmed Coronavirus disease were being treated as inpatients. There was a statistically significant improvement in anxiety level following redeployment which was mainly attributed to the support received by staff within the redeployed area. 71% of the redeployed group were found to have sufficient PPE was provided for the area they worked in. Interpretation: This is the first national survey performed on redeployment of ophthalmologists in the UK. The study showed that ophthalmologists across all grades were able to contribute in most aspects of patient care. Anxiety of redeployment was reduced by prior training and good support in the redeployment area.

Recruitment of cancer patients to National Institute for Health research cancer research network portfolio studies between 2001 and 2011.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6091-6091 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew Cooper ◽  
Karen Poole ◽  
David A. Cameron ◽  
Robert Haward ◽  
Peter John Selby ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Research ◽  
United Kingdom ◽  
National Health Service ◽  
Health Service ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Health Research ◽  
Research Network ◽  
Cancer Research Network ◽  
The United Kingdom ◽  
The Uk

6091 Background: The National Institute for Health Research Cancer Research Network (NCRN) was established in 2001 in England, United Kingdom to improve cancer patient outcomes by improving the coordination, integration and speed of cancer research. Methods: Baseline recruitment of cancer patients in England to clinical studies was around 4% of incident population. Research Networks were established initially in England (NCRN) and then across the UK, co-terminus with clinical cancer service networks, and a per capita based funding model used to provide a research infrastructure to support recruitment to a nationally defined research portfolio. Results: Within 3 years, as the networks were established, recruitment of patients to studies doubled from 10,000 to 20,000 cancer patients per year. Recruitment has continued to increase year on year, supported initially by underspend that had accrued from earlier years in the life of NCRN, and more recently from additional resources invested via the NIHR comprehensive networks. Data for 2010/11 show that over 45,000 cancer patients are now recruited into portfolio studies in England each year, with over 50,000 across the whole of the UK. Conclusions: Dedicated, targeted, clinician-led National Health Service investment into supporting national portfolio studies, has delivered an unprecedented five-fold increase in recruitment of cancer patients into clinical trials across the United Kingdom. This required coordinated research infrastructure, close cooperation with research funders, particularly Cancer Research UK and the National Cancer Research Institute, and the enthusiasm and hard work of many clinicians, patients and others working to deliver clinical cancer care in the National Health Service in the United Kingdom.

Health Systems in the United Kingdom and Their Role in Increasing Equity

PEDIATRICS ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 112 (Supplement_3) ◽  
pp. 716-720
Author(s):  
Leslie Davidson
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Health Care ◽  
United Kingdom ◽  
National Health Service ◽  
Health Service ◽  
The United States ◽  
Personal Reflection ◽  
Levels Of Care ◽  
The United Kingdom ◽  
The Uk

The Issue. This article describes the organization of the National Health Service with respect to the primary and secondary levels of care it offers children. It begins with a personal reflection from 17 years ago that is still relevant to the challenges confronting families in the United Kingdom today. It will discuss the basics of what is different and what is similar when comparing the UK health care system to that of the United States.

Criteria for Approval of Training Programmes for Senior Registrars in Orthodontics in the United Kingdom

1989 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 285-288
Author(s):  
H. S. Orton
Keyword(s):  
United Kingdom ◽  
National Health Service ◽  
Health Service ◽  
Paediatric Dentistry ◽  
Senior Registrar ◽  
The United Kingdom ◽  
Training Post ◽  
Training Programmes ◽  
The Uk ◽  
Registrar Training

To be appointed as a consultant orthodontist in the British National Health Service requires a period of 3 + years in a higher training post as a senior registrar in orthodontics. Educational approval of these training posts is controlled by the Joint Committee for Higher Training in Dentistry. The detailed monitoring and requirements of senior registrar training posts are controlled by the Specialist Advisory Committee in Orthodontics and Paediatric Dentistry. Revised criteria for the approval of training programmes have recently been issued and are appended for the guidance of aspirant trainees, trainers and for the reader seeking an understanding of the UK title of ‘Consultant Orthodontist’.

Patient and carer participation in old age psychiatry in England. Part II: models of participation

2011 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 185-196 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan Mary Benbow
Keyword(s):  
United Kingdom ◽  
Organizational Learning ◽  
National Health Service ◽  
Health Service ◽  
Old Age ◽  
National Health ◽  
Balance Of Power ◽  
Learning And Development ◽  
The United Kingdom ◽  
Old Age Psychiatry

ABSTRACTBackground: There are a number of models of patient and carer participation. Their usefulness and applicability to old age psychiatry is considered.Methods: Models of participation are reviewed and related to examples of participation initiatives drawn from the author's work in the context of the National Health Service in the United Kingdom.Results: Models of participation which emphasize collaboration and partnership are found to be useful. Simple interventions such as copying letters to patients and/or carers can lead to change in the balance of power between staff and patients/carers. Initiatives which draw on the experiences of patients and carers can facilitate organizational learning and development. Involving patients and carers in education offers a way to influence services and the staff working in them.Conclusion: Participation is better understood as a spectrum rather than a hierarchy. Old age psychiatry services would benefit from developing greater patient and carer participation at all levels.

scholarly journals A unique measles B3 cluster in the United Kingdom and the Netherlands linked to air travel and transit at a large international airport, February to April 2014

2016 ◽  
Vol 21 (13) ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Nic Lochlainn ◽  
Sema Mandal ◽  
Rita de Sousa ◽  
Karthik Paranthaman ◽  
Rob van Binnendijk ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
United Kingdom ◽  
The Netherlands ◽  
Virus Strain ◽  
Measles Virus ◽  
The Philippines ◽  
The United Kingdom ◽  
Public Health Officials ◽  
The Uk ◽  
In Transit

This report describes a joint measles outbreak investigation between public health officials in the United Kingdom (UK) and the Netherlands following detection of a measles cluster with a unique measles virus strain. From 1 February to 30 April 2014, 33 measles cases with a unique measles virus strain of genotype B3 were detected in the UK and the Netherlands, of which nine secondary cases were epidemiologically linked to an infectious measles case travelling from the Philippines. Through a combination of epidemiological investigation and sequence analysis, we found that measles transmission occurred in flight, airport and household settings. The secondary measles cases included airport workers, passengers in transit at the same airport or travelling on the same flight as the infectious case and also household contacts. This investigation highlighted the particular importance of measles genotyping in identifying transmission networks and the need to improve vaccination, public health follow-up and management of travellers and airport staff exposed to measles.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document