Combined transconjunctival sutureless three-port vitrectomy and scleral fixation of intraocular lens

2021 ◽  
pp. 112067212110491
Author(s):  
Carla Danese ◽  
Paolo Lanzetta
Keyword(s):  
Intraocular Lens ◽  
Intraocular Lenses ◽  
Intraocular Lens Implantation ◽  
Combined Procedure ◽  
Scleral Fixation ◽  
Less Invasive ◽  
Secondary Iol Implantation ◽  
Minimally Invasive Surgical ◽  
Lens Implantation

Purpose The aim of this article is to describe an innovative and minimally invasive surgical technique for posterior vitrectomy combined with secondary intraocular lens implantation, using a sutureless scleral fixation Carlevale intraocular lens (I71 FIL SSF Carlevale lens. Soleko IOL Division, Italy). Methods The technique was conducted with only three transconjunctival sclerotomies and a corneal tunnel to perform intraocular lens explantation, posterior vitrectomy and Carlevale intraocular lens implantation. It is easier, quicker, and less invasive than the traditional technique with conjunctival peritomy, two scleral flaps and five sclerotomies. Results Surgery was performed uneventfully on three eyes of three patients. Two of them presented a luxation of the intraocular lens into the vitreous chamber, while one patient presented an intraocular lens subluxation. No complications were observed after a 5 to 8 months of follow-up. The intraocular lenses were well positioned, no conjunctival erosion was noted, and the intraocular pressure remained normal at all stages. Conclusions This is the first report of a combined procedure of IOL explantation, posterior vitrectomy and secondary IOL implantation using only three transconjunctival sclerotomies. This appears to be less invasive and it causes less discomfort to the patient. We suggest considering this technique in all those cases requiring a combined procedure in absence of a proper capsular support.

The pattern of increasing intraocular pressure after phakic anterior chamber intraocular Lens Implantation

2019 ◽  
Vol 43 (1) ◽  
pp. 45
Author(s):  
Puty Lestari ◽  
Widyandana Widyandana ◽  
Agus Supartoto
Keyword(s):  
Intraocular Pressure ◽  
Anterior Chamber ◽  
Intraocular Lens ◽  
Intraocular Lenses ◽  
Wilcoxon Test ◽  
Intraocular Lens Implantation ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Lens Implantation ◽  
Phakic Intraocular Lenses

Background: Phakic intraocular lenses (IOL) are being used to correct refractive errors. We studied the pattern of increasing Intraocular Pressure (IOP) after Phakic Anterior chamber intraocular lens implantation as the risk after surgery. Methods: Sixty eyes of 30 patients were enrolled. All eyes underwent the same protocol with IOP examination before surgical procedure, and during follow up (one day after, 2 weeks, 1 month, 2 months and 3 months) after implantation of phakic IOL anterior chamber. All results were analyzed statistically using SPSS 16 statistics software. Correlation between parameter were analyzed using the wilcoxon test. Results: Median IOP before surgery were 14.00 mmHg (IOP), during follow up 17.00 mmHg (IOP I), 16.00 mmHg (IOP II) , 17.00 mmHg (IOP III), 15.00 mmHg (IOP IV), 15.00 mmHg (IOP V). The increasing of IOP between pre surgery and follow up a day after was found to correlate significantly (p=0.03), there were increasing of IOP after 2 weeks, a month, 2 and 3 months but no significant difference. Conclusion: There were significant of increasing IOP before surgery compare to a day after surgery,then the pattern of increasing IOP tend to be stable. There were no significant increasing of IOP during 3 months follow up.

scholarly journals Effect of phacoemulsification with intraocular lens implantation in eyes with cataract and functioning filtering blebs

2013 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 33-41
Author(s):  
Devendra Maheshwari ◽  
Rengappa Ramakrishanan ◽  
Mohideen Abdul Kader ◽  
Neelam Pawar ◽  
Ankit Gupta
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Intraocular Pressure ◽  
Intraocular Lens ◽  
Intraocular Lens Implantation ◽  
Corrected Visual Acuity ◽  
Lens Implantation ◽  
The Mean ◽  
One Year ◽  
Best Corrected Visual Acuity

Aim: To evaluate the effect of phacoemulsification with intraocular lens implantation in eyes with pre-existing trabeculectomy.Methods: This prospective single-center clinical study evaluated intraocular pressure in 60 eyes of 60 patients who underwent phacoemulsification and implantation of a foldable intraocular lens after a previous successful trabeculectomy. Patients who had a trabeculectomy more than one year prior to the study were included. Intraocular pressure, number of antiglaucoma medications, bleb appearance, and visual acuity were recorded preoperatively, and at each follow-up examination and 12 months after phacoemulsification.Results: The mean intraocular pressure before phacoemulsification was 12.42 mmHg (SD, 4.60 mmHg), which increased to 14.98 mmHg (SD, 4.18 mmHg), 14.47 mmHg (SD, 3.58 mmHg), 15.44 mmHg (SD, 3.60 mmHg), and 15.71 mmHg (SD, 3.47 mmHg) after one, three, six, and 12 months, respectively. At each follow-up visit, the mean IOP was significantly higher than the preoperative value (p < 0.001, p = 0.015, p ≤ 0.001, and p = 0.001 at month one, three, six, and 12, respectively). The mean preoperative best-corrected visual acuity was 0.98 logMAR (SD, 0.44 logMAR) and the mean postoperative best-corrected visual acuity at 12 months was 0.20 logMAR (SD, 0.21 logMAR) [p = 0.0001]. The mean preoperative number of antiglaucoma medications used was 0.57 (SD, 0.63), which increased to 0.65 (SD, 0.63 ), 0.70 (SD, 0.72 ) 0.68, (SD, 0.70), and 0.67 (SD, 0.77 ) at one, three, six, and 12 months, respectively, but there were no statistically significant differences. Bleb size decreased clinically after phacoemulsification. Nineteen of 60 eyes (32%) developed fibrosis of bleb with decreased bleb size.Conclusion: Phacoemulsification with intraocular lens implantation significantly increased intraocular pressure and increased the number of antiglaucoma medications in eyes with pre-existing functioning filtering blebs.

Traumatic pediatric cataract: A decade of follow-up after Artisan® aphakia intraocular lens implantation

2007 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. 555-558 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marije L. Sminia ◽  
Monica Th.P. Odenthal ◽  
Liesbeth J.J.M. Wenniger-Prick ◽  
Nitza Gortzak-Moorstein ◽  
Hennie J. Völker-Dieben
Keyword(s):  
Intraocular Lens ◽  
Intraocular Lens Implantation ◽  
Pediatric Cataract ◽  
Lens Implantation

Is scleral fixation a safe procedure for intraocular lens implantation?

Macular Edema ◽  
2000 ◽  
pp. 113-120 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paolo Lanzetta ◽  
Francesco M. Bandello ◽  
Gianni Virgili ◽  
Sabrina Crovato ◽  
Ugo Menchini
Keyword(s):  
Intraocular Lens ◽  
Safe Procedure ◽  
Intraocular Lens Implantation ◽  
Scleral Fixation ◽  
Lens Implantation

Factors Influencing Visual Outcome after Penetrating Keratoplasty Combined with Intraocular Lens Implantation

2003 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 134-138 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.B. Jonas ◽  
R.M. Rank ◽  
W.M. Budde ◽  
G. Sauder
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Intraocular Lens ◽  
Penetrating Keratoplasty ◽  
Visual Outcome ◽  
Intraocular Lens Implantation ◽  
Postoperative Visual Acuity ◽  
Factors Influencing ◽  
Lens Implantation ◽  
Preoperative Visual Acuity

Purpose To establish which factors influence visual outcome after penetrating keratoplasty combined with intraocular lens implantation. Methods This retrospective noncomparative clinical interventional case series study included 135 consecutive patients (mean age 70.2 ± 13.6 years) who underwent central penetrating allogenic keratoplasty combined with intraocular lens (IOL) implantation, all operated by the same surgeon. There were 79 triple procedures, 33 keratoplasties combined with an exchange of IOL, and 23 penetrating keratoplasties combined with a secondary implantation of a posterior chamber lens. Mean follow-up was 28.3 ± 18.7 months (range 3.3–112 months). Reasons for keratoplasty were herpetic or traumatic corneal scars or defects (46), Fuchs corneal endothelial dystrophy (22), pseudophakic or aphakic bullous keratopathy (49), corneal endothelial decompensation due to other reasons (15), and keratoconus (3). Main outcome measures were postoperative visual acuity and gain in visual acuity. Results Mean postoperative visual acuity and mean gain in visual acuity were 0.33 ± 0.21 (median 0.30) and 0.25 ± 0.20 (median 0.20), respectively. Compared with the preoperative measurements, mean visual acuity increased in 129 patients (129/135, 95.6%). Factors influencing postoperative visual outcome and gain in visual acuity were preoperative visual acuity (p<0.005), reason for keratoplasty (p<0.005), and diameter of the graft (p = 0.046). Postoperative visual outcome was independent of age, sex, right or left eye, presence of diabetes mellitus, preoperative refractive error, length of follow-up, duration of surgery, and preoperative intraocular pressure. Conclusions The most important factors influencing visual outcome after central penetrating allogenic keratoplasty combined with IOL surgery are preoperative visual acuity, graft size, and reason for keratoplasty. Other factors such as age, sex, diabetes mellitus, and preoperative refractive error do not substantially influence postoperative visual outcome.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document