Placement issues of hemodialysis catheters with pre-existing central lines and catheters

2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 366-369 ◽  
Author(s):  
Afsha Aurshina ◽  
Anil Hingorani ◽  
Ahmad Alsheekh ◽  
Pavel Kibrik ◽  
Natalie Marks ◽  
...  

Objective: It has been a widely accepted practice that a previous placed pacemaker, automatic implantable cardioverter defibrillators, or central line can be a contraindication to placing a hemodialysis catheter in the ipsilateral jugular vein. Fear of dislodging pacing wires, tunneling close to the battery site or causing venous obstruction has been a concern for surgeons and interventionalists alike. We suggest that this phobia may be unfounded. Methods: A retrospective review was conducted of patients in whom hemodialysis catheters were placed over a period of 10 years. For each hemodialysis catheter that was placed, perioperative chest X-ray performed was used to evaluate for pre-existing pacemakers and central lines. The position and laterality of placement of the hemodialysis catheter along with presence of arteriovenous fistula with functional capacity for access were noted. Results: A total of 600 hemodialysis catheters were placed in patients over the period of 10 years. The mean age of the patients was 73.6 ± 12 years with a median age of 76 years. We found 20 pacemakers or automatic implantable cardioverter defibrillators and 19 central lines on the same side of the neck as the hemodialysis catheter that was placed in the ipsilateral jugular vein. No patient exhibited malfunction or dislodgment of the central line, the pacemaker, or automatic implantable cardioverter defibrillator or evidence of upper extremity venous obstruction based upon signs symptoms or duplex exams. Conclusion: Based on our experience, we suggest that placement of hemodialysis catheter in the internal jugular vein ipsilateral to the pre-existing catheter/leads is safe and spares the contralateral limb for arteriovenous fistula creation.

2017 ◽  
pp. 30-7
Author(s):  
Pipiet Wulandari ◽  
Sunu B Raharjo ◽  
Dicky A Hanafy ◽  
Lina Haryati ◽  
Yoga Yuniadi

Background: Twiddler syndrome is an infrequent but potentially dangerous complication of device therapy for dysrhythmias. This syndrome results from manipulation of implanted pulse generator by the patient, leading to traction and subsequent lead dislodgement. It can also occur spontaneously. It has been increasingly reported with pacemaker or implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs). In this reports, we describe two patients with Twiddler syndrome with substantial retraction of their lead who denied any manipulation of their device.Case Illustration: The first patient was a 56 year-old man with single-chamber ICD due to dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) with congestive heart failure and severe systolic left ventricular dysfunction (ejection fraction 18%). The dislodged lead causing rhythmical twitching of left pectoral muscles and abdominal pulsations. The second patient was a 69 year-old man with dual-chamber pacemaker due to total atrioventricular block with normal systolic left ventricular function (ejection fraction 70%). It manifested as dyspnea on effort, and he also underwent pacemaker implantation. They underwent primary devices implantation at April 2016 and reposition of generators and its leads in December 2016. The first and second patients denied of manipulating the generator of ICD or pacemaker and rotated their left arm and right arm, respectively, after implantation.Summary: Other unconscious arm abduction during sleep or increased muscular activity of the shoulder and arm might have led to repetitive motions within the pocket and dislodge the device. Adequate individualized patient and family education and regular evaluation every 6 month of the leads position with fluoroscopy or chest X-ray is advisable.


2021 ◽  
pp. 112972982110522
Author(s):  
Octavio J Salgado ◽  
Tushar J Vachharajani

The placement of large bore double-lumen catheters for hemodialysis (HD) is one of the most frequent procedures performed in HD patients. However, these procedures are associated with complications, the most common being catheter malposition. In this context, catheter deviation to the left superior intercostal vein (LISV) is a very uncommon malposition, which must be differentiated from intrathoracic extravascular catheter lodgment. We report a case of an adult male patient on hemodialysis who presented with a thrombosed arteriovenous fistula and requiring urgent HD. His past medical history included hemophilia, allergy to contrast media, and multiple previous central vein catheterizations. A non-tunneled HD catheter was placed without any difficulty in the left internal jugular vein. However, the arterial lumen failed to pull any blood with free flow in the venous lumen. A chest X-ray revealed a surprising finding. The malpositioned catheter was removed successfully without any complications.


Circulation ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 93 (1) ◽  
pp. 91-98 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea Natale ◽  
Jasbir Sra ◽  
Kathi Axtell ◽  
Masood Akhtar ◽  
Keith Newby ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document