scholarly journals The “ironic” fair process effect: A perceived fair naturalization procedure spurs anti-immigration attitudes through increased host national identification among naturalized citizens

2020 ◽  
pp. 136843022097548
Author(s):  
Kim Dierckx ◽  
Emanuele Politi ◽  
Barbara Valcke ◽  
Jasper van Assche ◽  
Alain Van Hiel
Keyword(s):  
Procedural Fairness ◽  
Effect Study ◽  
Dark Side ◽  
Mediation Model ◽  
Present Contribution ◽  
Fair Process ◽  
Naturalized Citizens ◽  
Immigration Attitudes ◽  
Fair Process Effect ◽  
Host Nation

A growing body of research has shown that naturalized citizens’ attitudes towards immigration worsen following citizenship acquisition. Accordingly, these socially mobile individuals tend to distance themselves from their former immigrant ingroup. The present contribution explains such self–group distancing coping strategy in terms of an “ironic” procedural fairness effect. Study 1 ( N = 566), a survey conducted among naturalized Swiss citizens, showed that fairness perceptions with respect to the naturalization process were indeed associated with stronger anti-immigration attitudes, and that this relationship was mediated by identification with the host nation. Next, two experiments were conducted to demonstrate the causality of the hypothesized mediation model. In Study 2 (Experiment 1; N = 248), fairness of the admission procedure (accurate vs. inaccurate) increased identification with a desirable group. In Study 3 (Experiment 2; N = 141), administration of a national identity prime evoked stronger anti-immigration attitudes. Taken together, our findings highlight a somewhat “dark side” of procedural fairness.

Gender as a Moderator of the Fair Process Effect

2009 ◽  
Vol 40 (4) ◽  
pp. 202-211 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andreas Hack ◽  
Frauke Lammers
Keyword(s):  
Gender Differences ◽  
High School Students ◽  
Ultimatum Game ◽  
Procedural Fairness ◽  
School Students ◽  
Fair Process ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Subsequent Behavior ◽  
Fair Process Effect ◽  
Allocation Decisions

This paper examines gender as a moderator of the fair-process effect in an ultimatum game setting. Results from games with 112 German high-school students support the hypothesis that fair procedures can decrease rejection behavior in unfair human allocation decisions. Furthermore, procedural fairness results in a statistically significant difference for women in accepting an unfair distribution. In contrast, procedural fairness appears to have no significant impact on men’s rejection behavior. However, we found no significant gender differences in the perception of procedural fairness. We conclude that, although men perceive procedural fairness similarly to women, this aspect is less important for determining their subsequent behavior.

Procedural fairness concerns in supply chain with retailer promotional effort

2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 302-330 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tengfei Nie ◽  
Hualin Liu ◽  
Yilun Dong ◽  
Shaofu Du
Keyword(s):  
Supply Chain ◽  
Stackelberg Game ◽  
Wholesale Price ◽  
Procedural Fairness ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Promotional Effort ◽  
Fair Process ◽  
Slotting Allowances ◽  
Fairness Concerns ◽  
Distributional Fairness

Purpose The existing literature has a lack of modeling of procedural fairness concerns in the supply chain level. This paper aims to investigate how procedural fairness concerns affect channel decisions, performance and coordination. Design/methodology/approach This paper considers a supply chain consisting of one supplier and one retailer who have procedural fairness concerns in a classic Stackelberg game setting. The model is set in sales promotional environment. According to the existing literature, engagement is used to depict fair process. Some findings are made through analyzing respective decisions of the supplier and the retailer under the influence of procedural fairness concerns. Findings The results show that the channel efficiency can be improved when the retailer exhibits procedural fairness concerns, but if the aversion to unfair process exceeds a certain threshold, the retailer cannot benefit from it. Besides, the retailer profits more when he cares about distributional fairness, although the whole channel surplus can be improved by procedural fairness concerns. Originality/value This is the first paper to study the influences of procedural fairness concerns on supply chain decisions and channel performance. Finally, a mechanism combining a wholesale price contract with slotting allowances is proposed to coordinate the supply chain.

How do I judge my outcome when I do not know the outcome of others? The psychology of the fair process effect.

1997 ◽  
Vol 72 (5) ◽  
pp. 1034-1046 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kees van den Bos ◽  
E. Allan Lind ◽  
Riël Vermunt ◽  
Henk A. M. Wilke
Keyword(s):  
Fair Process ◽  
Fair Process Effect

17. Procedural Fairness and Remedies

2020 ◽  
pp. 681-726
Author(s):  
David Cabrelli
Keyword(s):  
Procedural Fairness ◽  
Fair Process ◽  
Unfair Dismissal

This chapter first examines the various conceptions of procedural fairness. It then underscores the diversity and adaptability of the standards of procedural fairness. It charts the approach of the tribunals and courts to the standards of procedural fairness and analyses the stages of a procedurally fair process. Finally, the chapter probes the remedies available in the case of a successful unfair dismissal, including the calculation of the basic award, the measure of compensation payable in the case of the compensatory award, and the orders of reinstatement and re-engagement. The chapter concludes with an overall assessment of the efficacy of the statutory unfair dismissal regime.

scholarly journals The Dark Side of Visionary Leadership in Strategy Implementation: Strategic Alignment, Strategic Consensus, and Commitment

2018 ◽  
Vol 46 (5) ◽  
pp. 637-665 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nüfer Yasin Ateş ◽  
Murat Tarakci ◽  
Jeanine Pieternel Porck ◽  
Daan van Knippenberg ◽  
Patrick J. F. Groenen
Keyword(s):  
Qualitative Interviews ◽  
Strategy Implementation ◽  
Visionary Leadership ◽  
Dark Side ◽  
Mediation Model ◽  
Moderated Mediation Model ◽  
Strategic Commitment ◽  
Strategy Process ◽  
Strategic Consensus ◽  
Management Literature

Drawing from visionary leadership and strategy process research, we theorize and test the mechanism through which middle and lower-level managers’ visionary leadership affects their teams’ strategic commitment. The management literature extols the virtues of visionary leadership. In contrast to this positive stance, we reveal a dark side to visionary leadership. Our theoretical framework suggests that team manager visionary leadership harms team strategic consensus when the manager is not strategically aligned with the CEO, which in turn diminishes team commitment to the strategy. In contrast, when a team manager is strategically aligned with the CEO, team manager visionary leadership is positively related to team strategic consensus and subsequently to team strategic commitment. Data from 136 teams from two organizations support our moderated mediation model. A supplemental analysis of the content of strategic consensus and additional qualitative interviews with managers and employees in one of these organizations provide additional insights concerning the meaning of the theorized relations in practice.

The Fair Process Effect in the Classroom: Reducing the Influence of Grades on Student Evaluations of Teachers

2018 ◽  
Vol 41 (3) ◽  
pp. 173-184
Author(s):  
Thomas M. Tripp ◽  
Lixin Jiang ◽  
Kristine Olson ◽  
Maja Graso
Keyword(s):  
Distributive Justice ◽  
Student Evaluation ◽  
Teaching Evaluations ◽  
Fair Process ◽  
Student Evaluations Of Teachers ◽  
Justice Perceptions ◽  
Research Findings ◽  
Evaluation Of Teaching ◽  
Fair Process Effect ◽  
The Relationship

Research findings tend to confirm anecdotal observations that instructors’ teaching evaluations are influenced by students’ grades, making some instructors feel pressured to reduce the academic rigor of their course in an attempt to get higher evaluations. To reduce this pressure, the current study tested whether distributive justice may explain the relationship between grades and student evaluation of teaching (SET) and how the fair process effect may moderate the relationship between distributive justice perceptions regarding grades and SET. Relying on the extant literature of procedural justice, we hypothesized that when students perceive no fair process that determines their grades, then: (a) the relationship between distributive justice perceptions and SET will be stronger and (b) the indirect effect of grades on SET via distributive justice perceptions will be stronger. Conversely, under conditions of strong fair process perceptions, these relationships will be attenuated. Using a survey of undergraduates’ perceptions of course fairness, we found support for our proposed hypotheses. We discuss the implications of our findings for higher education faculty.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document