A rapid appraisal method for reviewing the effectiveness of workplace smoking policies in large and medium sized organisations

2001 ◽  
Vol 121 (1) ◽  
pp. 50-55 ◽  
Author(s):  
Harold D. Harvey ◽  
Paul Fleming ◽  
Michael Patterson
2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 211-220
Author(s):  
Yujiao Mai ◽  
Trung Ha ◽  
Julia N. Soulakova

AbstractWe discuss the most recent changes in smoking policies and support for smoking cessation offered to smokers at US workplaces. We used reports of employed adults (n = 112,008) regarding smoking restrictions and support for smoking cessation offered at their indoor workplaces from the 2010–11 and 2014–15 Tobacco Use Supplement–Current Population Survey. The percentage of adults who reported having workplace smoking restrictions was 94% in 2010–11 and 93% in 2014–15 (P = 0.001). There was a decrease in the Northeastern region (P < 0.001) and no significant changes in the other three US regions. The percentages decreased in Hawaii, New York, Oregon, Pennsylvania, and Tennessee and increased in Indiana, Nebraska, and Wyoming. The percentage of employees who reported having workplace support for smoking cessation increased from 24% to 29% (P < 0.001), which was uniform across all US regions but differed across the US states. The percentages decreased in Hawaii and increased in the majority of states. Analysis of smokers' reports (versus all reports) resulted in lower percentages of workplaces with smoking restrictions and support for smoking cessation. It is essential to further enhance support for smoking cessation offered to smokers at US workplaces.


1999 ◽  
Vol 89 (4) ◽  
pp. 728-747 ◽  
Author(s):  
William N Evans ◽  
Matthew C Farrelly ◽  
Edward Montgomery

In recent years workplace smoking policies have become increasingly prevalent and restrictive. Using data from two large-scale national surveys, we investigate whether these policies reduce smoking. Our estimates suggest that workplace bans reduce smoking prevalence by 5 percentage points and daily consumption among smokers by 10 percent. Although workers with better health habits are more likely to work at firms with smoking bans, estimates from systems of equations indicate that these results are not subject to an omitted variables bias. The rapid increase in bans can explain all of the recent drop in smoking among workers relative to nonworkers. (JEL J28, I18)


1992 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 42 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bess H. Marcus ◽  
Karen M. Emmons ◽  
David B. Abrams ◽  
Robert J. Marshall ◽  
Margaret Kane ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 105 ◽  
pp. 3207-3212
Author(s):  
Muhammad Kunta Biddinika ◽  
Raden Muhammad Ali ◽  
Raden Ibnu Rosyadi ◽  
Ahmad Muhammad Diponegoro ◽  
Koji Tokimatsu ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
C. Eduardo Siqueira ◽  
Elizabeth Barbeau ◽  
Richard Youngstrom ◽  
Charles Levenstein ◽  
Glorian Sorensen

This article summarizes the origins and implementation of labor-management negotiated tobacco control policies in public workplaces in New York state during the 1980s and 1990s. It is an in-depth case study that illustrates the confrontation and cooperation among three main social actors involved in the design and implementation of workplace smoking policies: public-sector labor unions, public health professionals, and state managers. The policy debates, legal, and political issues that emerge from this history suggest hopeful avenues for improving the dialogue and cooperation on the design and implementation of workplace smoking policies between and among public health professionals, managers, and labor union leaders in the United States. Understanding how these parties can reach agreement and work together may help tobacco control advocates and labor leaders join forces to enact future tobacco control policies.


1997 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 199-206 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. K. Gerlach ◽  
D. R. Shopland ◽  
A. M. Hartman ◽  
J. T. Gibson ◽  
T. F. Pechacek

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document