scholarly journals A critical discussion of the use of film in participatory research projects with homeless young people: an analysis based on case examples from England and Canada

2020 ◽  
pp. 146879412096537
Author(s):  
Alastair Roy ◽  
Jacqueline Kennelly ◽  
Harriet Rowley ◽  
Cath Larkins
Keyword(s):  
Young People ◽  
Participatory Research ◽  
Research Process ◽  
Critical Discussion ◽  
The Other ◽  
Symbolic Violence ◽  
Research Projects ◽  
Case Examples ◽  
Key Aspects ◽  
Distinct Role

The focus of this paper is on the complex and sometimes contradictory effects of generating films with and about young people who have experienced homelessness, through participatory research. Drawing on two projects – one in Ottawa, Canada, and the other in Manchester, UK – we scrutinise two key aspects of participatory research projects that use film: first, how to appropriately communicate the complexity of already-stigmatised lives to different publics, and second, which publics we prioritise, and how this shapes the stories that are told. Through a theoretical framework that combines Pierre Bourdieu’s account of authorised language with Arthur Frank’s socio-narratology, we analyse the potential for generating justice versus reproducing symbolic violence through participatory research and film with homeless young people. In particular, we scrutinise the distinct role played by what we are calling first, second and third publics – each with their own level of distance and relationship to the participatory research process.

Analysis of Experts' and Trainers' Views on Cyberbullying

2010 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 169-181 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Jäger ◽  
João Amado ◽  
Armanda Matos ◽  
Teresa Pessoa
Keyword(s):  
Young People ◽  
Media Literacy ◽  
Delphi Method ◽  
Research Process ◽  
Training Manual ◽  
Children And Young People ◽  
Case Examples ◽  
Video Clips ◽  
Technical Developments ◽  
Online Focus Groups

AbstractPartners from nine European countries developed a cyberbullying training manual for the benefit of trainers working with parents, school staff and young people.1The development of the training manual built on a two-level qualitative research process that combined elements of the Delphi method and online focus groups. The two studies outlined in this article aimed to assess trainers' and experts' views on the problem of cyberbullying while also gathering insight in relation to their preferences in terms of a training manual. This article outlines the main outcomes of a content analysis of experts' and trainers' views. According to experts and trainers, the sources of cyberbullying were specifically related to new technical developments and new patterns of usage, a lack of media literacy and media education, and the lack of appropriate laws, control and reporting mechanisms. Approaches for tackling cyberbullying suggested by experts and trainers included the provision of enhanced information on ICT and e-safety, adequate rules, monitoring mechanisms and sanctions. Furthermore a range of approaches targeting children and young people, parents and other adults, schools as well as approaches run by authorities and IT providers were suggested. In terms of the elements and style of a training manual, experts and trainers emphasised that it should be practically oriented, and that elements like narratives, case examples or video clips would be vital for the implementation of training.

scholarly journals Doing It Write: Representation and Responsibility in Writing Up Participatory Research Involving Young People

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 219-227 ◽  
Author(s):  
Catherine Wilkinson ◽  
Samantha Wilkinson
Keyword(s):  
Young People ◽  
Participatory Research ◽  
Research Projects ◽  
North West ◽  
Doctoral Research ◽  
The North ◽  
Speech Characteristics ◽  
Look Back ◽  
Consumption Practices ◽  
Phd Theses

This article adopts a reflexive stance as the authors look back on their doctoral research projects; the first author exploring young people’s relationships with community radio, and the second author studying young people’s alcohol consumption practices and experiences, both in the North West of England, UK. The authors discuss the methods of data collection they employed, which enabled young people the opportunity to participate in meaningful ways. However, drawing on snapshots from their PhD theses, the authors question whether decisions made when writing up related to protecting anonymity, (re)presenting speech characteristics, and editing, independently of participants, potentially undid some of the hard work exerted in creating an equitable space for young people’s contributions, resultantly perpetuating the regulation of young people and keeping them ‘in their place’. The authors propose some recommendations for facilitating the inclusion of young people in the writing up of participatory research.

Twice-Exceptional Students

2022 ◽  
pp. 20-38
Author(s):  
Susan Baum ◽  
Richard Olenchak
Keyword(s):  
Academic Performance ◽  
Young People ◽  
Great Risk ◽  
The Other ◽  
Educational Services ◽  
High Ability ◽  
Exceptional Students ◽  
Twice Exceptional ◽  
Case Examples ◽  
Exceptional Student

Young people who present with concomitant high ability and disabilities represent one of education's greatest conundrums. While on one hand they appear capable of superior academic performance, on the other hand they struggle as students. Consequently, identification and educational services for the twice-exceptional student population remain bewildering and elusive as the combination of seemingly paradoxical traits puts them at great risk for identification and consequently this population of students is rarely served appropriately. This chapter explores the complexities of the twice-exceptional (2e) population, how they should be viewed, how schools and homes can accommodate what seem to be dichotomous needs, and how ultimately they can be successful and contented. Case examples amplify understanding of this challenging group of young people.

Conclusions

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andy Lane ◽  
Sue Oreszczyn
Keyword(s):  
Case Studies ◽  
Participatory Research ◽  
Environmental Sustainability ◽  
Research Process ◽  
Mapping Techniques ◽  
Research Praxis ◽  
Key Aspects ◽  
Systemic Practices

This chapter draws the themes of the book together and, in particular, reflects on the use of the mapping techniques used by the various authors in the book in helping the research process. It highlights key aspects and outcomes from the case studies, and considers the lessons that may be learned for researching environmental sustainability. It discusses mapping, environmental sustainability, systemic practices, participatory research, and methods and methodology. It concludes that although mapping or diagramming is a valued and valuable parts of research praxis into environmental sustainability, this is not the only or better way to do research. The authors express hope that the book inspires readers to apply mapping in complex environmental situations.

A children’s perspective on child abuse

1999 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 9-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan Mason ◽  
Jan Falloon
Keyword(s):  
Child Abuse ◽  
Young People ◽  
Research Process ◽  
The Other ◽  
Children And Young People ◽  
Abusive Behaviour ◽  
The Right ◽  
The Way

Discourses about child abuse are usually adult centred. In the research described in this paper young people were asked to give their perspectives on abuse. They described abusive behaviour as that perpetrated by persons who use their power to control those they consider as lesser.The young people described two forms of abuse. One was feeling let down by those with whom they are in an emotional relationship. The other was feeling discounted because of their age. The children and young people considered the right to negotiate or to have ‘two-way compromise’ as essential to the prevention of abuse. The power to disclose or not to disclose abuse was described as an important issue for children in enabling them to maintain some control over their situation.The research process and findings highlighted the way in which the institutionalisation of adult power over children as legitimate, excludes children’s knowledge on issues concerning them by preventing their participation in knowledge creating forums, and by discounting their competency as children to contribute.

Graduate Education Grounded in Community-Based Participatory Research

2007 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 18-21 ◽  
Author(s):  
Megan Sheehan ◽  
Brian Burke ◽  
Jeremy Slack
Keyword(s):  
Graduate Students ◽  
Participatory Research ◽  
Participant Observation ◽  
Community Based Participatory Research ◽  
Research Process ◽  
Research Projects ◽  
Community Based ◽  
Field Notes ◽  
Ambos Nogales ◽  
The Cost

Research projects at the University of Arizona's Bureau of Applied Research in Anthropology (BARA) have provided graduate students an opportunity to engage in anthropological inquiry and application, often in teams, and with guidance from experienced researchers. In this paper, we focus on our experiences as graduate students working on two community-based environmental anthropology research projects in the sister cities of Nogales, Sonora, and Nogales, Arizona (known collectively as Ambos Nogales). In choosing to participate in these projects, we hoped to develop our skills with specific anthropological research methods (interviews, participant-observation, surveys, focus groups, and the writing of field notes), gain experience with a community-based participatory research (CBPR) model (including strategies for prioritizing community decision-making and incorporating local knowledge and interests throughout the research process), improve our Spanish skills, and learn to integrate research and action in a mutually-enriching way. Of course, having a job that reduced the cost of school was beneficial, but our main goal was to become anthropologists capable of contributing to academic, policy, and community-based action.

scholarly journals Awareness, views and experiences of Citizen Science among Swedish researchers — two surveys

2021 ◽  
Vol 20 (06) ◽  
pp. A10
Author(s):  
Pavel Bína ◽  
Fredrik Brounéus ◽  
Dick Kasperowski ◽  
Niclas Hagen ◽  
Martin Bergman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Data Quality ◽  
Citizen Science ◽  
Research Process ◽  
Open Science ◽  
Agricultural Science ◽  
The Other ◽  
Research Projects ◽  
External Communication ◽  
Research Questions ◽  
The University

In 2021 Sweden’s first national portal for citizen science will be launched to help researchers practice sustainable and responsible citizen science with different societal stakeholders. This paper present findings from two surveys on attitudes and experiences of citizen science among researchers at Swedish universities. Both surveys provided input to the development of the national portal, for which researchers are a key stakeholder group. The first survey (n=636) was exclusively focused on citizen science and involved researchers and other personnel at Swedish University of Agricultural Science (SLU). 63% of respondents at SLU had heard about citizen science (CS) prior to the survey; however a majority of these (61%) had not been involved in any CS initiative themselves. Dominant reasons for researchers choosing a CS approach in projects were to enable collection of large amounts of data (68%), improving the knowledge base (59%), improving data quality (25%), promote participants’ understanding in research (21%) and promote collaboration between the university and society (20%). The other survey (n=3 699) was on the broader topic of communication and open science, including questions on CS, and was distributed to researchers from all Swedish universities. 61% of respondents had not been engaged in any research projects where volunteers were involved in the process. A minority of the researchers had participated in projects were volunteers had collected data (18%), been involved in internal or external communication (16%), contributed project ideas (14%) and/or formulated research questions (11%). Nearly four out of ten respondents (37%) had heard about CS prior to the survey. The researchers were more positive towards having parts of the research process open to citizen observation, rather than open to citizen influence/participation. Our results show that CS is a far from well-known concept among Swedish researchers. And while those who have heard about CS are generally positive towards it, researchers overall are hesitant to invite citizens to take part in the research process.

Conducting health research with resettled refugees in Australia: field sites, ethics, and methods

2019 ◽  
pp. 230-244
Author(s):  
Celia McMichael ◽  
Caitlin Nunn
Keyword(s):  
Qualitative Research ◽  
Health Research ◽  
Psychosocial Health ◽  
Research Process ◽  
Qualitative Research Methods ◽  
Capital City ◽  
Research Practice ◽  
Research Projects ◽  
Rigorous Research ◽  
Key Aspects

Research involving resettled refugees presents many complexities. In particular, how do we engage ethically with research participants and also ensure that the data we produce is rigorous and makes a productive contribution to knowledge about refugee health? This chapter reflects on two qualitative research projects involving people from refugee backgrounds who have resettled in Victoria, Australia: one project with refugee-background women living in the capital city, Melbourne; another with refugee-background youth living in Bendigo, a regional city. Both projects focused on refugee settlement and psychosocial health. Focusing on three key aspects of the research process: conceptualizing the field site, ethics in practice and qualitative research methods, we suggest that the dual imperatives of refugee research—significance to people with refugee backgrounds and relevant agencies, institutions and governments, and ethical and rigorous research practice—are best served by a reflexive, sensitive and creative relationship with both the research process and with refugee-background participants.

Reflexivity and ethical mindfulness in participatory research with children: What does it really look like?

Childhood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 400-415 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonia Canosa ◽  
Anne Graham ◽  
Erica Wilson
Keyword(s):  
Young People ◽  
Participatory Research ◽  
Lived Experiences ◽  
Research Process ◽  
Ethical Responsibility ◽  
Growing Up ◽  
Tourist Destination ◽  
Children And Young People ◽  
Relational Approach ◽  
Research With Children

This article draws attention to the ethical nuances of conducting participatory research with children and young people growing up in a popular tourist destination in Australia. It responds to calls for more reflexively oriented approaches to documenting the ethical dimensions of qualitative research, particularly with children. Prolonged engagement in the field facilitated a deeper understanding of young people’s lived experiences and the challenges they face in negotiating identity, belonging and connection with community. Findings reveal there are a number of important benefits when actively involving young people in research. With the democratisation of the research process, however, comes an increased ethical responsibility which requires a reflexive and relational approach if meaningful and inclusive participation is to be achieved.

Navigating Ethical Issues in Photovoice: Balancing the Principles of Community-Based Participatory Research Ethics with Institutional Review Board Requirements

2021 ◽  
pp. 155626462110327
Author(s):  
Lauren E. McDonald ◽  
Moshoula Capous-Desyllas
Keyword(s):  
Participatory Research ◽  
Cultural Context ◽  
Ethical Issues ◽  
Community Based Participatory Research ◽  
Research Process ◽  
Critical Discussion ◽  
Institutional Review Boards ◽  
Collaborative Relationships ◽  
Community Based ◽  
Institutional Review

This article reflects on ethical issues that arose during the course of two different evaluation projects that used photovoice method to engage with marginalized populations. The evaluations serve as case studies for a critical discussion about potential barriers that researchers may face when employing photovoice method while trying to balance the principles of community-based participatory research with the requirements of Institutional Review Boards. We reflect on ethical dilemmas related to the meaning of photography within the cultural context of participants’ lives, the compensation of participants as collaborators, and the representation and dissemination of participant photos. We conclude by examining how researchers may approach ethical requirements without compromising the important collaborative relationships central to photovoice method. We additionally call on researchers to engage with ethics review committees to create a new “participant–researcher” category with its own set of protocols that recognizes the nuanced role members of disenfranchised communities play in the research process.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document