A Follow-Up Study on Recidivism among Adjudicated Juveniles with Special Education in the Juvenile Correctional Facility

Youth Justice ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 328-343
Author(s):  
Taiping Ho ◽  
Gregory C. Rocheleau

This study examines recidivism among adjudicated juveniles in special education programs in the juvenile correctional facility during the period of 2009–2015. There were two aims of this research: to conduct exploratory analyses of recidivism and to examine whether level of education relates to recidivism among this segment of juvenile offenders. Results revealed that 37.6 % of adjudicated juveniles with special education recidivated and that 52 % of those who recidivated were recommitted within 12 months of being released. Results from logistic regression also show that education failed to significantly predict recidivism once other factors were controlled for in multivariate analyses.

1988 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 209-216 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard S. Neel ◽  
Nancy Meadows ◽  
Phyllis Levine ◽  
Eugene B. Edgar

Recently there have been several follow-up studies of students who have exited special education programs (Hasazi, Gordon, & Roe, 1985; Mithaug, Horiuchi, & Fanning, 1985). These studies raise an interesting question: How well have special education programs prepared the youth they were designed to serve? This study reviews findings concerning the postschool adjustment of 160 students who were labeled behaviorally disordered at graduation from public school in the state of Washington between 1978 and 1986.


1984 ◽  
Vol 50 (4) ◽  
pp. 334-342 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lawrence W. Marrs

The bandwagon has finally reached rural America. This article discusses important considerations for those who would board this bandwagon carrying baggage which includes preconceived ideas about using traditional special education programs to prepare special educators for rural areas. Competencies and curriculum elements which should be included in preservice programs are discussed.


1970 ◽  
Vol 37 (4) ◽  
pp. 261-268 ◽  
Author(s):  
William M. Cruickshank ◽  
Herbert C. Quay

The growing concern about planning and providing effective physical facilities for special education programs is presented. Particular emphasis is focused on the inadequacy of decisions made by special educators and architects regarding the nature of the physical environment in the absence of empirically obtained evidence. Supporting the need for such research, some of the difficulties encountered—the isolation of variables, management techniques, and design—are discussed.


1964 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 129-142 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tony C. Milazzo ◽  
Kenneth R. Blessing

The presentation of a point of view on the training of administrators of special education, a survey of current practices involved in such training, and a statement of goals adopted by NASDSE in this area. It is expected that this presentation will stimulate further needed discussion by those concerned with quality leadership in special education.


1988 ◽  
Vol 54 (4) ◽  
pp. 297-301 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nadine M. Lambert

This article summarizes the contemporary major authoritative sources relevant to decisions about eligibility for an appropriate placement of children in special education programs. These sources reflect the work of three major panels commissioned by the National Academy of Science to undertake an analysis of the issues and research evidence regarding ability testing and the testing of handicapped people.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document