scholarly journals Collaborative Research: Techniques for Conducting Collaborative Research From the Science of Team Science (SciTS)

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 72-86 ◽  
Author(s):  
John R. Turner ◽  
Rose Baker
Keyword(s):  
Graduate Students ◽  
Human Resource Development ◽  
Collaborative Research ◽  
Team Science ◽  
Collaborative Environments ◽  
Research And Practice ◽  
Promotion And Tenure ◽  
Science Of Team Science ◽  
Collaborative Efforts ◽  
Improved Methods

The Problem The field of human resource development (HRD) is a multidisciplinary field of research and practice requiring collaboration. Unfortunately, the literature on how to conduct collaborative research is incomplete within HRD and other disciplines. Any breakdown in the communication, exchange of ideas, agreed-upon methodologies, or shared credit for dissemination has the potential of preventing research from moving forward. Promotion and tenure policies also hamper collaborative efforts in that these policies often reward individual initiative as opposed to collaborative outcomes. These behavioral patterns provide constraints to the improvement and betterment of efforts to changing of the guard. The Solution This article highlights new and improved methods for working in collaborative environments. During an academic’s transition and professional development, these methods will help emerging scholars, new to collaborative research, when facing the team science revolution. The Stakeholders Scholars and scholar-practitioners engaged in collaborative research. Emerging scholars who are beginning their journey into collaborative research. Graduate students preparing for a career in academia.

scholarly journals Team science as interprofessional collaborative research practice: a systematic review of the science of team science literature

2016 ◽  
Vol 65 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-22 ◽  
Author(s):  
Meg M Little ◽  
Catherine A St Hill ◽  
Kenric B Ware ◽  
Michael T Swanoski ◽  
Scott A Chapman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Health Outcomes ◽  
Patient Care ◽  
Collaborative Research ◽  
Collaborative Practice ◽  
Team Science ◽  
Research Practice ◽  
Interprofessional Collaborative Practice ◽  
Science Of Team Science

The National Institute of Health's concept of team science is a means of addressing complex clinical problems by applying conceptual and methodological approaches from multiple disciplines and health professions. The ultimate goal is the improved quality of care of patients with an emphasis on better population health outcomes. Collaborative research practice occurs when researchers from >1 health-related profession engage in scientific inquiry to jointly create and disseminate new knowledge to clinical and research health professionals in order to provide the highest quality of patient care to improve population health outcomes. Training of clinicians and researchers is necessary to produce clinically relevant evidence upon which to base patient care for disease management and empirically guided team-based patient care. In this study, we hypothesized that team science is an example of effective and impactful interprofessional collaborative research practice. To assess this hypothesis, we examined the contemporary literature on the science of team science (SciTS) produced in the past 10 years (2005–2015) and related the SciTS to the overall field of interprofessional collaborative practice, of which collaborative research practice is a subset. A modified preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) approach was employed to analyze the SciTS literature in light of the general question: Is team science an example of interprofessional collaborative research practice? After completing a systematic review of the SciTS literature, the posed hypothesis was accepted, concluding that team science is a dimension of interprofessional collaborative practice.

Integrating Research and Practice: Looking Back

2017 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 219-231 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jia Wang
Keyword(s):  
Human Resource Development ◽  
Human Resource ◽  
Applied Field ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Resource Development ◽  
Research And Practice ◽  
Viable Solution ◽  
Scholarly Practice ◽  
Applied Fields ◽  
Looking Back

The Problem The divide between research and practice has long been recognized by both scholars and practitioners in multiple applied fields, including our field of human resource development (HRD). Significant amount of energy has been devoted to identify ways to bridge the gap, yet the divide has remained noticeably wide. Developing scholar-practitioners is considered a viable solution, yet how to prepare them is not quite so clear. The Solution This issue provides an actionable plan by drawing upon the firsthand experiences and real-life examples from those who have successfully crossed the two worlds. By focusing on the how-to, this issue provides a tool box for multiple parties. The Stakeholders Three groups of stakeholders will benefit directly from this issue, scholar-practitioners, practitioners seeking scholarly practice, and scholars desiring to ground their research in practice. This issue will also benefit organizations, intermediaries, and HRD as an applied field.

“We Had a Blast!”

2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 37-53 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen Asunka
Keyword(s):  
Graduate Students ◽  
Adult Learners ◽  
Blended Learning ◽  
Private University ◽  
Descriptive Statistics ◽  
Learning Approach ◽  
Research And Practice ◽  
African Higher Education ◽  
African Context ◽  
Sub Saharan

As many important issues pertaining to blended learning within the Sub-Saharan African context remain unexplored, this study implemented a blended learning approach in a graduate level course at a private university in Ghana, with the objective of exploring adult learners' attitudes, experiences and behaviors towards this learning approach, as well as their perceptions towards blended learning in general. Forty-eight graduate students participated in the study as they engaged in a six-week long blended learning course. Qualitative research methods were used to gather data which were analysed using grounded theory coding techniques, descriptive statistics and content analysis. Findings reveal high levels of student engagement and satisfaction with the learning processes, and an overwhelming endorsement of blended learning as a preferred mode of learning. Implications of these findings for further research and practice are discussed within the context of technology adoption and use in the Ghanaian and Sub-Saharan African higher education contexts.

scholarly journals Measuring quality and outcomes of research collaborations: An integrative review

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (5) ◽  
pp. 261-289
Author(s):  
Beth B. Tigges ◽  
Doriane Miller ◽  
Katherine M. Dudding ◽  
Joyce E. Balls-Berry ◽  
Elaine A. Borawski ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Group Dynamics ◽  
Research Collaboration ◽  
Clinical Care ◽  
Psychometric Testing ◽  
Integrative Review ◽  
Team Science ◽  
Research Collaborations ◽  
Collaboration Quality ◽  
Quality And Outcomes ◽  
Science Of Team Science

AbstractIntroduction:Although the science of team science is no longer a new field, the measurement of team science and its standardization remain in relatively early stages of development. To describe the current state of team science assessment, we conducted an integrative review of measures of research collaboration quality and outcomes.Methods:Collaboration measures were identified using both a literature review based on specific keywords and an environmental scan. Raters abstracted details about the measures using a standard tool. Measures related to collaborations with clinical care, education, and program delivery were excluded from this review.Results:We identified 44 measures of research collaboration quality, which included 35 measures with reliability and some form of statistical validity reported. Most scales focused on group dynamics. We identified 89 measures of research collaboration outcomes; 16 had reliability and 15 had a validity statistic. Outcome measures often only included simple counts of products; publications rarely defined how counts were delimited, obtained, or assessed for reliability. Most measures were tested in only one venue.Conclusions:Although models of collaboration have been developed, in general, strong, reliable, and valid measurements of such collaborations have not been conducted or accepted into practice. This limitation makes it difficult to compare the characteristics and impacts of research teams across studies or to identify the most important areas for intervention. To advance the science of team science, we provide recommendations regarding the development and psychometric testing of measures of collaboration quality and outcomes that can be replicated and broadly applied across studies.

scholarly journals A Multi-Level Systems Perspective for the Science of Team Science

2010 ◽  
Vol 2 (49) ◽  
pp. 49cm24-49cm24 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Borner ◽  
N. Contractor ◽  
H. J. Falk-Krzesinski ◽  
S. M. Fiore ◽  
K. L. Hall ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Team Science ◽  
Systems Perspective ◽  
Multi Level ◽  
Science Of Team Science

scholarly journals Toward a Family-Friendly Academy: HRD’s Role in Creating Healthy Work–Life Cultural Change Interventions

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 11-22
Author(s):  
Barbara A. W. Eversole ◽  
Cindy L. Crowder
Keyword(s):  
Performance Management ◽  
Human Resource Development ◽  
Cultural Change ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Work Life ◽  
Organizational Policies ◽  
Professional Career ◽  
Promotion And Tenure ◽  
Family Friendly ◽  
Work Life Conflict

The Problem The ideal worker in the Academy devotes most of their lives to scholarly pursuits, which leaves little time for family. This problem leads to work–life conflict, which is particularly concerning for faculty members who are seeking promotion and tenure. Work–life conflict is most challenging in the case of academic mothers, who face professional career challenges in addition to work–life conflict. Rigid organizational policies and non-supportive cultures perpetuate the problem, particularly when the faculty member is an academic mother seeking promotion and tenure. The Solution Human resource development (HRD) interventions implemented at the individual, departmental, and institutional levels (e.g., training development, performance management, and career development initiatives) have been shown to reduce work–life conflict, improve overall well-being, and create a more family friendly environment. Organization development (OD) cultural change interventions aimed at changing the Academy to become more family focused and supportive of career flexibility are recommended. The Stakeholders Academic faculty, higher education administrators, HRD scholars, and practitioners.

scholarly journals Cultural diversity drives innovation: empowering teams for success

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 323-343
Author(s):  
Graham Jones ◽  
Bernardita Chirino Chace ◽  
Justin Wright
Keyword(s):  
Cultural Diversity ◽  
Cultural Awareness ◽  
Assessment Tools ◽  
Thinking Styles ◽  
Team Science ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Team Diversity ◽  
Diversity And Inclusion ◽  
Innovation Teams ◽  
Science Of Team Science

Purpose Though there is broad agreement on the beneficial impact of diversity in management and leadership roles, much of the innovative capacity of an organization is realized at the unit level in working teams. Recent research points to cultural diversity having an especially significant impact on innovation team performance. The reports also highlight the need for the optimal team operating principles to derive maximum benefit. To prepare such innovation teams for success, it is valuable to understand the dynamics of team diversity at the project level and the underlying barriers and opportunities presented. Design/methodology/approach This paper reviews the literature and case studies on cultural inputs to ideation and innovation, assessing team diversity through readily available instruments and the deployment of the science of team science (SciTS) principles in innovation teams. Findings The key learnings include the importance of establishing communication standards, SciTS principles, team assessment of thinking styles and the utility of cultural awareness instruments. Practical implications Diversity provides a creative advantage for innovation teams. However, team dynamics play an important role in maximizing these advantages, and cross-cultural competence of team members is required. Deployment of appropriate assessment tools and team methodologies enhances the likelihood of successful outcomes including in remote team settings. Originality/value Literature from diverse functional areas is summarized including the science of team science, organizational management, diversity and inclusion methodologies and ethnocultural dynamics. It provides pointers for the optimal formation and operating principles with highly culturally diverse teams.

scholarly journals Adolescent and young adult lymphoma: collaborative efforts toward optimizing care and improving outcomes

2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (22) ◽  
pp. 1945-1958 ◽  
Author(s):  
Justine M. Kahn ◽  
Nmazuo W. Ozuah ◽  
Kieron Dunleavy ◽  
Tara O. Henderson ◽  
Kara Kelly ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Young Adult ◽  
Collaborative Research ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Care Delivery ◽  
Large Cell ◽  
Adolescent And Young Adult ◽  
Large Cell Lymphoma ◽  
State Of The Science ◽  
Young Adult Oncology ◽  
Collaborative Efforts

Abstract Lymphomas are responsible for approximately 20% to 25% of annual cancer diagnoses in the adolescent and young adult (AYA) population. In 2006, the National Cancer Institute and the Lance Armstrong Foundation developed a joint Adolescent and Young Adult Oncology Progress Review Group (AYAO-PRG) to formally address the unique cancer burden of patients age 15 to 39 years. As part of their recommendations, the AYAO-PRG identified 5 imperatives for improving outcomes of AYAs with cancer. Broadly, the recommended areas of focus included research, awareness and education, investigational infrastructure, care delivery, and advocacy. In response to the challenges highlighted by the AYAO-PRG, the Lymphoma Research Foundation held the first AYA Lymphoma Research Foundation Symposium on 2 October 2015. At this symposium, clinicians and basic scientists from both pediatric and adult disciplines gave presentations describing the state of the science and proposed a collaborative research agenda built on the imperatives proposed by the AYAO-PRG. The following review presents an in-depth discussion of lymphoma management across pediatric and adult oncologic disciplines, focusing on Hodgkin lymphoma, mature B-cell lymphomas, and anaplastic large cell lymphoma.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document