Intention to Participate in Group Prenatal Care: Moving Beyond Yes or No

2018 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 123-132 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca Berman ◽  
Kim Weber Yorga ◽  
Jeanelle Sheeder

Group prenatal care (GPNC) is an alternative model to traditional individual care and may improve public health outcomes. Prior studies suggest that interest in GPNC varies widely and few studies have examined characteristics predictive of interest in this model. The purpose of this study was to inform GPNC recruitment efforts by examining likelihood of participation delineated by characteristics and GPNC perceptions. Pregnant participants received information about GPNC then completed a survey measuring demographic, psychosocial, and reproductive characteristics, likelihood to participate in GPNC, and factors influencing selections. Respondents expressed varied levels of likelihood to participate in GPNC; 16.2% low likelihood, 44.9% moderate likelihood, and 38.9% high likelihood. Characteristics were similar between groups, and thus their use is not recommended when targeting recruitment efforts. Benefits outweighed barriers and threats for the high likelihood category, barriers and threats outweighed benefits for the low likelihood category, and benefits, barriers, and threats were balanced for the moderate likelihood category. Accurately assessing likelihood of participating in GPNC efficiently identifies individuals who are clearly either going to decline or participate, as well as promotes targeted recruitment efforts directed at those who are ambivalent. Understanding and addressing perceived benefits, barriers, and threats supports effective GPNC recruitment.

2019 ◽  
Vol 53 ◽  
pp. 85
Author(s):  
Zafiro Andrade-Romo ◽  
Ileana B. Heredia-Pi ◽  
Evelyn Fuentes-Rivera ◽  
Jacqueline Alcalde-Rabanal ◽  
Lourdes Bravo Bolaños Cacho ◽  
...  

Group prenatal care is an alternative model of care during pregnancy, replacing standard individual prenatal care. The model has shown maternal benefits and has been implemented in different contexts. We conducted a narrative review of the literature in relation to its effectiveness, using databases such as PubMed, EBSCO, Science Direct, Wiley Online and Springer for the period 2002 to 2018. In addition, we discussed the challenges and solutions of its implementation based on our experience in Mexico. Group prenatal care may improve prenatal knowledge and use of family planning services in the postpartum period. The model has been implemented in more than 22 countries and there are challenges to its implementation related to both supply and demand. Supply-side challenges include staff, material resources and organizational issues; demand-side challenges include recruitment and retention of participants, adaptation of material, and perceived privacy. We highlight specific solutions that can be applied in diverse health systems.


Author(s):  
Ebony B. Carter ◽  
Kate Barbier ◽  
Pamela K. Hill ◽  
Alison G. Cahill ◽  
Graham A. Colditz ◽  
...  

Objective This study aimed to determine the feasibility and effectiveness of Diabetes Group Prenatal Care to increase patient engagement in diabetes self-care activities. Study Design A pilot randomized controlled trial was conducted at two sites. Inclusion criteria were English or Spanish speaking, type 2 or gestational diabetes, 22 to 34 weeks of gestational age at first study visit, ability to attend group care at specified times, and willingness to be randomized. Exclusion criteria included type 1 diabetes, multiple gestation, major fetal anomaly, serious medical comorbidity, and serious psychiatric illness. Women were randomized to Diabetes Group Prenatal Care or individual prenatal care. The primary outcome was completion of diabetes self-care activities, including diet, exercise, blood sugar testing, and medication adherence. Secondary outcomes included antenatal care characteristics, and maternal, neonatal, and diabetes management outcomes. Analysis followed the intention-to-treat principle. Results Of 159 eligible women, 84 (53%) consented to participate in the study and were randomized to group (n = 42) or individual (n = 42) prenatal care. Demographic characteristics were similar between study arms. Completion of diabetes self-care activities was similar overall, but women in group care ate the recommended amount of fruits and vegetables on more days per week (5.1 days/week ± 2.0 standard deviation [SD] in group care vs. 3.4 days ± 2.6 SD in individual care; p < 0.01) and gained less weight per week during the study period (0.2 lbs/week [interquartile range: 0–0.7] vs. 0.5 lbs/week [interquartile range: 0.2–0.9]; p = 0.03) than women in individual care. Women with gestational diabetes randomized to group care were 3.5 times more likely to have postpartum glucose tolerance testing than those in individual care (70 vs. 21%; relative risk: 3.5; 95% confidence interval: 1.4–8.8). Other maternal, neonatal, and pregnancy outcomes were similar between study arms. Conclusion Diabetes group care is feasible and shows promise for decreasing gestational weight gain, improving diet, and increasing postpartum diabetes testing among women with pregnancies complicated by diabetes. Key Points


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melissa Buultjens ◽  
Ambereen Farouque ◽  
Leila Karimi ◽  
Linda Whitby ◽  
Jeannette Milgrom ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Emily Heberlein ◽  
Jessica C. Smith ◽  
Ana LaBoy ◽  
Jessica Britt ◽  
Amy Crockett

Objective(s): Group prenatal care models were initially designed for women with medically low risk pregnancies, and early outcome data focused on these patient populations. Pregnancy outcome data for women with medically high-risk pregnancies participating in group prenatal care is needed to guide clinical practice. This study compares rates of preterm birth, low birthweight, and neonatal intensive care unit admissions among women with medical risk for poor birth outcomes who receive group vs. individual prenatal care. Study Design: This retrospective cohort study uses vital statistics data to compare pregnancy outcomes for women from 21 obstetric practices participating in a statewide expansion project of group prenatal care. The study population for this paper included women with pregestational or gestational hypertension, pregestational or gestational diabetes, and high body mass index (BMI >45). Patients were matched using propensity scoring, and outcomes were compared using logistic regression. Two levels of treatment exposure based on group visit attendance were evaluated for women in group care: any exposure (1 or more groups) or minimum threshold (≥ 5 groups). Results: Participation in group prenatal care at either treatment exposure level was associated with a lower risk of NICU admissions (10.2% group vs 13.8% individual care, OR 0.708, p<0.001). Participating in the minimum threshold of groups (≥5 sessions) was associated with reduced risk of preterm birth (11.4% group vs. 18.4% individual care, OR 0.569, p<0.001) and NICU admissions (8.4% group vs. 15.9% individual care, OR 0.483, p<0.001). No differences in birthweight were observed. Conclusion: This study provides preliminary evidence that women who have or develop common medical conditions during pregnancy are not at greater risk for preterm birth, low birthweight, or NICU admissions if they participate in group prenatal care. Practices who routinely exclude patients with these conditions from group participation should reconsider increasing inclusivity of their groups.


Eos ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 102 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alka Tripathy-Lang

Silicone wristbands can help monitor pregnant women’s exposure to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Tracking these toxic chemicals, produced by combustion, could improve public health outcomes.


2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Linda O'Mara ◽  
Ruta Valaitis ◽  
Nancy Murray ◽  
Donna Meagher-Stewart ◽  
Sabrina Wong ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document