Translumbar Embolization of Type II Endoleaks: 12 Years of Experience at a Regional Vascular Centre

2020 ◽  
Vol 54 (5) ◽  
pp. 389-394 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wiliam Rhodri Thomas ◽  
Salil Karkhanis ◽  
Jonathan Hopkins ◽  
Martin Duddy
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Psoas Abscess ◽  
Endovascular Aneurysm Repair ◽  
Major Complication ◽  
Type Ii ◽  
Technical Success Rate ◽  
Feeding Vessels ◽  
Major Complication Rate ◽  
Aneurysm Repair

Background and Aims: The management of persistent type II endoleaks (T2E) is often problematic for the endovascular specialist, with a lack of clear evidence for the best approach for embolization. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of translumbar embolization (TLE) for T2E following endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). Methods: This retrospective review included 27 embolizations performed on 23 patients with a median age of 78 (range 67-94 years; male: female 15:9), during the period September 2006 to July 2018. Primary outcome was freedom from aneurysm sac growth defined as <2 mm sac diameter increase on subsequent computed tomography. Results: The initial technical success rate was 100%, with complete “on table” embolization of the T2E on fluoroscopy; however, 4 (15%) patients needed repeat TLE due to persistent endoleak identified on follow-up computed tomography or because of further sac expansion. Satisfactory stasis was achieved in these 4 cases following a second embolization. The mean volume of embolic injected was 7.4 mL per case. Feeding vessels were identified on angiography in all cases; the nidus was supplied by lumbar branches in 21 cases, by the inferior mesenteric artery in 1 case and by both in a further 5 cases. Freedom from aneurysm sac growth (defined as < 2 mm) following 1 or 2 separate TLE was achieved in 18 (78%) and 20 (86%) patients, respectively. The major complication rate was <5% with one case of psoas abscess presenting 7 months following embolization; there were 2 minor complications in the form of intraprocedural transient abdominal pain. Conclusion: The translumbar approach is a safe and effective technique to treat T2E, as evidenced by the low complication and reintervention rate.

An Institution-Wide Algorithm for Treatment of Type II Endoleak Following Endovascular Aneurysm Repair (EVAR)

2018 ◽  
Vol 52 (4) ◽  
pp. 249-254 ◽  
Author(s):  
Saum Rahimi ◽  
Naiem Nassiri ◽  
Lauren Huntress ◽  
Dustin Crystal ◽  
Jones Thomas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endovascular Aneurysm Repair ◽  
Type Ii ◽  
Type Ii Endoleak ◽  
Feeding Vessels ◽  
Aneurysm Repair ◽  
Graft Migration ◽  
Embolization Procedure ◽  
Definitive Management ◽  
Procedure Type

Objectives: Multiple endovascular techniques have been described for the treatment of persistent type II endoleaks (pT2ELs) causing aneurysm sac growth following endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). In the event of a failed endovascular procedure and a pT2EL, a consensus regarding further treatment is lacking, and the literature suggests repeated endovascular attempts are rarely successful. Herein, we propose an algorithm for definitive management of pT2ELs with persistent sac growth following EVAR. Methods: A retrospective review of 29 patients who underwent treatment of persistent sac growth in the setting of pT2ELs was performed. Intervention methods were determined at the discretion of the operating surgeon. Aneurysmal sac enlargement was defined as a diameter increase > 5 mm, and persistent endoleak was defined as lasting greater than 6 months. Results: From 2000 to 2015, 917 EVAR procedures were performed at our institution. Isolated pT2ELs with sac enlargement were identified in 29 patients. Twenty-five patients underwent direct translumbar sac puncture and coiling and/or Onyx (Onyx, Plymouth, Minnesota) embolization of the culprit vessels. Thirteen (52%) of 25 patients had pT2EL after first endovascular intervention, and 10 (40%) of 25 patients failed 2 endovascular treatments. Of those 10, 7 displayed persistent aneurysmal sac growth and underwent a third embolization procedure. Type II endoleaks persisted in 6 patients; 3 patients were subsequently treated with laparotomy, ligation of lumbar vessels, sac exploration, and sac plication around the endograft. Technical success for this technique was 100%. During a mean follow-up of 38.4 months, no recurrent T2ELs, stent graft migration, and/or disjunction were observed. Conclusions: We propose a new algorithm for the management of pT2ELs. If 2 endovascular procedures fail to control of the endoleak, repeat endovascular attempts are not recommended. Endovascular failure should be followed by laparotomy with surgical ligation of culprit feeding vessels followed by sac exploration and plication of the sac, and endoaneurysmorrhaphy.

Image-guided translumbar type II endoleak repair: A novel approach

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
pp. 9
Author(s):  
Salman Mirza ◽  
Shahnawaz Ansari
Keyword(s):  
Mesenteric Artery ◽  
Inferior Mesenteric Artery ◽  
Endovascular Aneurysm Repair ◽  
Type Ii ◽  
Type Ii Endoleak ◽  
Image Guided ◽  
Novel Approach ◽  
Abdominal Aortic ◽  
Aneurysm Repair

We present a case of a 72-year-old male with an abdominal aortic aneurysm status post-endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). Follow-up imaging demonstrated an enlarging type II endoleak and attempts at transarterial coil embolization of the inferior mesenteric artery were unsuccessful. The patient underwent image-guided percutaneous translumbar type II endoleak repair using XperGuide (Philips, Andover, MA USA).

Comparing polymer-filled versus self-expanding endografts in Chinese patients

2018 ◽  
Vol 26 (9) ◽  
pp. 667-676
Author(s):  
Yuk Law ◽  
Yiu Che Chan ◽  
Stephen Wing-Keung Cheng
Keyword(s):  
Endovascular Aneurysm Repair ◽  
Aortic Aneurysms ◽  
The Self ◽  
Chinese Patients ◽  
Type Ii ◽  
Mortality And Morbidity ◽  
Type Ia ◽  
One Year ◽  
Aneurysm Repair

Introduction We performed a single-center nonrandomized study on patients who underwent endovascular aneurysm repair using polymer-filled or other self-expanding endografts. Methods Consecutive patients with asymptomatic infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms who underwent endovascular repair were retrospectively reviewed. They were divided into a polymer-filled ( n = 20) or self-expanding group ( n = 42). Baseline characteristics, operative mortality and morbidity, and follow-up data were compared. Results Aneurysm diameter, neck and iliac morphologies did not differ between the two groups. Technical success was 100%. The 30-day mortality was 0% and 2.4% in the polymer-filled and self-expanding group, respectively. At a mean follow-up of 17 months, the changes in sac size were −2.1 mm and −5.1 mm ( p = 0.144) at one year, and −3.5 mm and −7.7 mm ( p = 0.287) at 2 years in the polymer-filled and self-expanding group, respectively. The polymer-filled group had 7 (35%) type II endoleaks, and the self-expanding group had 1 (2.4%) type Ia and 13 (31%) type II endoleaks. Neck diameter remained stable in the polymer-filled stent-grafts whereas there was progressive neck degeneration in the self-expanding group. The rates of reintervention and overall survival were similar in both groups. The presence of an endoleak was the only predictor of non-regression of the aneurysm (odds ratio = 17.00, 95% confidence interval: 4.46–64.88, p < 0.001). Conclusion Polymer-filled endografts had similar safety, effectiveness, and durability to other self-expanding endografts. The major advantage is the small iliofemoral access. They also have the potential long-term benefit of a more stable neck.

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound detects type II endoleaks during follow-up for endovascular aneurysm repair

2020 ◽  
Vol 72 (6) ◽  
pp. 1952-1959
Author(s):  
Lydia Johnsen ◽  
Jonny Hisdal ◽  
Torbjorn Jonung ◽  
Audun Braaten ◽  
Gustav Pedersen
Keyword(s):  
Endovascular Aneurysm Repair ◽  
Type Ii ◽  
Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound ◽  
Contrast Enhanced ◽  
Aneurysm Repair

A Long-Time Follow-Up Study of a Single-Center Endovascular Aneurysm Repair (Evar) Endoleak Outcomes

2018 ◽  
Vol 52 (7) ◽  
pp. 505-511 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rosa Marie Andersen ◽  
Daniel P. Henriksen ◽  
Hossein Mohit Mafi ◽  
Sten Langfeldt ◽  
Jacob Budtz-Lilly ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endovascular Aneurysm Repair ◽  
Plasma Creatinine ◽  
National Database ◽  
Type I ◽  
Type Ii ◽  
Single Center ◽  
Iliac Arteries ◽  
Internal Iliac ◽  
Aneurysm Repair

Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence, risk factors, and outcome of endoleaks related to endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) procedure at a single center with up to 10 years’ surveillance. Materials and Methods: All patients treated with EVAR for an abdominal aorta or iliac aneurysm in a 10-year period at a single cardiovascular center in Denmark were included. Data were collected from a national database and patient journals. Follow-up computed tomography angiography and plain abdominal X-ray reports were reviewed. Results: A total of 421 patients were included. There were 125 endoleaks observed in 117 (27.8%) patients after a median 95 days (interquartile range: 90-106 days). There were 16 type I, 107 type II, 1 type III, and 1 type V endoleaks. A total of 33 (7.8%) patients had at least 1 reintervention. Patients with type II endoleaks had significantly fewer active smokers and lower plasma creatinine at baseline. They also more often had one, or both, internal iliac arteries embolized as well as an identified endoleak at the procedural completion angiogram. Non-type II endoleaks were associated with internal iliac artery embolization. There was no association between the occurrence of endoleaks and increased mortality. Conclusion: Type II endoleaks are common after EVAR, yet few lead to reintervention. Absence of smoking, low plasma creatinine, embolized iliac arteries, and endoleak on completion angiogram were associated with type II endoleaks, whereas only embolized iliac arteries were associated with non-type II endoleaks. Overall, endoleaks are not associated with increased mortality.

scholarly journals Time-Enhancement Curve of Four-Dimensional Computed Tomography Predicts Aneurysm Enlargement with Type-II Endoleak after Endovascular Aneurysm Repair

Aorta ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 08 (02) ◽  
pp. 029-034
Author(s):  
Yunosuke Nishihara ◽  
Kota Mitsui ◽  
Shinya Azama ◽  
Daisuke Okamoto ◽  
Manabu Sato ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Equilibrium Phase ◽  
Endovascular Aneurysm Repair ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Type Ii ◽  
Ct Scanner ◽  
Stable Group ◽  
Ct Number ◽  
4D Ct ◽  
Aneurysm Repair

Abstract Objective We investigated the hemodynamic features of Type-II endoleaks after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) using four-dimensional (4D) computed tomography (CT) to identify patients with aneurysm enlargement. Methods During a 13-month period (January 2017–January 2018) at our institution, we performed 4D-CT examinations in 13 patients after EVAR because of suspected Type-II endoleaks. Three patients were excluded from the study because of other endoleaks or absence of detectable endoleaks. The ramaining 10 patients were divided into two groups: enlargement group (n = 4), in which the aneurysm volume increased, and stable group (n = 6), in which the aneurysm remained stable or shrank. A CT scanner and three-dimensional workstation were used. All images were obtained using a consistent protocol (22 phase scans using the test bolus tracking method). We analyzed the hemodynamics of the endoleak cavity (EC) relative to those of the aorta and evaluated the time-enhancement curves (TECs) using measurement protocols. The strengths of correlations between these factors in the two groups were analyzed statistically. Results TECs in the enlargement group showed a more gradual curve, and the upslope, the gradient of TEC in the ascending phase and the upslope index were significantly more gradual than those in the stable group (p = 0.0247, 0.0243). The EC washout and the EC washout index were also more gradual than in the stable group's (p = 0.019, 0.019). The enhancement duration was longer in the former than in the latter (80%, p = 0.0195; 70%, p = 0.0159; 60%, p = 0.0159). The CT number in the equilibrium phase was larger in the enlargement group than in the stable group (p = 0.019). Conclusion The 4D-CT is useful for predicting aneurysm enlargement with Type-II endoleaks after EVAR.

Early Computed Tomographic Angiography after Endovascular Aneurysm Repair: Worthwhile or Worthless?

Vascular ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 16 (5) ◽  
pp. 253-257 ◽  
Author(s):  
Evert J. Waasdorp ◽  
Joost A. van Herwaarden ◽  
Rob H.W. van de Mortel ◽  
Frans L. Moll ◽  
Jean-Paul P.M. de Vries
Keyword(s):  
Stent Graft ◽  
Endovascular Aneurysm Repair ◽  
Computed Tomographic Angiography ◽  
Type I ◽  
Type Ii ◽  
Graft Thrombosis ◽  
Computed Tomographic ◽  
Tomographic Angiography ◽  
Aneurysm Repair

This study evaluated the value of computed tomographic angiography (CTA) early after an endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) in relation to CTA 3 months after EVAR. We retrospectively reviewed all elective EVAR patients with available postprocedural and 3-month follow-up CTAs who were treated between 1996 and 2006. CTAs were analyzed for EVAR-related complications in terms of endoleaks, migration, and stent graft thrombosis. Secondary procedures and other complications within a 4-month time interval after EVAR were noted and analyzed for any association with the postprocedural CTA. During the study period, 291 patients (275 men), with a mean age of 71 years, underwent elective EVAR. All had postprocedural and 3-month follow-up CTAs, which detected 93 (32%) endoleaks (8 type I, 84 type II, 1 type III) and 1 stent graft thrombosis. These findings resulted in four secondary interventions (one interposition cuff, two extension cuffs, one conversion). All reinterventions were successfully done in an elective setting. During the first 3 postoperative months, five other reinterventions were required for acute ischemia in four patients (three Fogarty procedures, one femorofemoral crossover bypass) or groin infection in one patient. Eight patients died, but none of the deaths were related to abdominal aortic aneurysm or EVAR (four cardiac, two pulmonary, one gastric bleeding, one carcinoma). At 3 months, 43 endoleaks (3 type I, 40 type II), 3 stent graft thromboses, and 1 stent graft migration were seen. In two patients (0.7%), a new endoleak was diagnosed compared with the postprocedural CTAs. In 287 (99%) of 291 patients, the postprocedural CTA did not influence our treatment policy in the first 3 months after EVAR. More than half of the early endoleaks were self-limiting, and new endoleaks were seen in only two patients (< 1%) at the 3-month follow-up CTA. After an uneventful EVAR procedure, it is safe to leave out the early postprocedural CTA.

Internal iliac coverage during endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms is a safe option: A preliminary study

Vascular ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 28-35 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vinay Kansal ◽  
Prasad Jetty ◽  
Dalibor Kubelik ◽  
George Hajjar ◽  
Andrew Hill ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Iliac Artery ◽  
Internal Iliac Artery ◽  
Endovascular Aneurysm Repair ◽  
External Iliac Artery ◽  
Aortic Aneurysms ◽  
Type Ii ◽  
Type Ii Endoleak ◽  
Internal Iliac

Endovascular aneurysm repairs lacking suitable common iliac artery landing zones occasionally require graft limb extension into the external iliac artery, covering the internal iliac artery origin. The purpose of this study was to assess incidence of type II endoleak following simple coverage of internal iliac artery without embolization during endovascular aneurysm repair. Three hundred eighty-nine endovascular aneurysm repairs performed by a single surgeon (2004–2015) were reviewed. Twenty-seven patients underwent simple internal iliac artery coverage. Type II endoleak was assessed from operative reports and follow-up computed tomography imaging. No patient suffered type II endoleak from a covered internal iliac artery in post-operative computed tomography scans. Follow-up ranged from 0.5 to 9 years. No severe pelvic ischemic complications were observed. In conclusion, for selected cases internal iliac artery coverage without embolization is a safe alternative to embolization in endovascular aneurysm repairs, where the graft must be extended into the external iliac artery.

scholarly journals Ten-year single-centre experience with type II endoleaks: Intervention versus observation

2017 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 316-323 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ikram-Ul Haq ◽  
Arun Kelay ◽  
Meryl Davis ◽  
Jocelyn Brookes ◽  
Tara M Mastracci ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endovascular Aneurysm Repair ◽  
Time Frame ◽  
Type Ii ◽  
Risk Of Mortality ◽  
Surveillance Imaging ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Aneurysm Growth ◽  
Aneurysm Repair

Our objective was to determine the relative merits of intervention or observation of type II endoleaks (T2Ls). A retrospective analysis was performed on 386 infra-renal endovascular aneurysm repair (IR-EVAR) patients from 2006 to 2015. Annual surveillance imaging of patients undergoing EVAR at our centre were analysed, and all endoleaks were subjected to a multidisciplinary team meeting for consideration and treatment. In the 10-year time frame, 386 patients (79.5±8.7 years) underwent an IR-EVAR. Eighty-one patients (21.0%) developed a T2L and intervention was undertaken in 28 (34.6%): 17 (60.7%) were treated via a transarterial approach (TA) and 11 (39.3%) using the translumbar approach (TL). Fifty-three patients (65.4%) with T2Ls were managed conservatively. Patients who received T2L treatment had a greater proportion of recurrent T2Ls than patients who were conservatively managed ( p=0.032). T2Ls associated with aneurysmal growth were more resistant to treatment than those where there was no change or a decrease in aneurysm size during follow-up (0.033). There was no significant difference in the TA and TL approach with respect to endoleak repair success ( p=0.525). Treatment of a T2L did not confer a survival advantage compared to conservative management ( p=0.449) nor did the choice of either the TA or TL approach ( p=0.148). Our study suggests the development of a T2L associated with aneurysm growth may represent an aggressive phenotype that is resistant to treatment. However, this did not lead to an increased risk of mortality over follow-up. Neither a transarterial nor a translumbar approach to treating a T2L conferred superiority.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document