Does Accountability and an Automation Decision Aid’s Reliability Affect Human Performance in a Visual Search Task?

2017 ◽  
Vol 61 (1) ◽  
pp. 183-187 ◽  
Author(s):  
Smruti J. Shah ◽  
James P. Bliss
Keyword(s):  
Visual Search ◽  
Undergraduate Students ◽  
Human Performance ◽  
Search Task ◽  
Visual Search Task ◽  
Identification Performance ◽  
Identification Task ◽  
Increasing Operator ◽  
Performance Errors ◽  
Incorrect Information

Some automation aids are not 100% reliable and can therefore provide incorrect information to users. If humans trust and comply with faulty automation aids, performance errors may result. In combat identification, performance errors may include fratricide or failure to identify enemies. In operator-automation teams, human accountability may reduce errors resulting from over-compliance and automation bias. The goal of the proposed study was to evaluate if reliability of an automation aid (60%, 80%) and accountability level (accountability, non-accountability) would influence human performance on a visual search task. Fifty-two undergraduate students performed a simulated combat identification task, aided by automation. Those in the 60% reliability condition committed more identification errors. However, this difference was eliminated for accountable participants. The findings suggest increasing operator accountability may improve identification performance and meliorate the adverse effects of unreliable automation.

Obsessive–compulsive disorder patients display enhanced latent inhibition on a visual search task

2006 ◽  
Vol 44 (8) ◽  
pp. 1137-1145 ◽  
Author(s):  
Oren Kaplan ◽  
Reuven Dar ◽  
Lirona Rosenthal ◽  
Haggai Hermesh ◽  
Mendel Fux ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Visual Search ◽  
Obsessive Compulsive Disorder ◽  
Latent Inhibition ◽  
Search Task ◽  
Visual Search Task ◽  
Obsessive Compulsive ◽  
Compulsive Disorder

Effect of parietal lobe lesions on saccade targeting and spatial memory in a naturalistic visual search task

2003 ◽  
Vol 41 (10) ◽  
pp. 1365-1386 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven S. Shimozaki ◽  
Mary M. Hayhoe ◽  
Gregory J. Zelinsky ◽  
Amy Weinstein ◽  
William H. Merigan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Visual Search ◽  
Spatial Memory ◽  
Search Task ◽  
Visual Search Task ◽  
Parietal Lobe

Effects of unilateral frontal eye-field lesions on eye-head coordination in monkey

1986 ◽  
Vol 55 (4) ◽  
pp. 696-714 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. van der Steen ◽  
I. S. Russell ◽  
G. O. James
Keyword(s):  
Visual Search ◽  
Search Task ◽  
Visual Search Task ◽  
Peak Velocity ◽  
Head Movements ◽  
Frontal Eye Field ◽  
Behavioral Task ◽  
Direct Gaze ◽  
Relative Neglect ◽  
Eye Field

We studied the effects of unilateral frontal eye-field (FEF) lesions on eye-head coordination in monkeys that were trained to perform a visual search task. Eye and head movements were recorded with the scleral search coil technique using phase angle detection in a homogeneous electromagnetic field. In the visual search task all three animals showed a neglect for stimuli presented in the field contralateral to the lesion. In two animals the neglect disappeared within 2-3 wk. One animal had a lasting deficit. We found that FEF lesions that are restricted to area 8 cause only temporary deficits in eye and head movements. Up to a week after the lesion the animals had a strong preference to direct gaze and head to the side ipsilateral to the lesion. Animals tracked objects in contralateral space with combined eye and head movements, but failed to do this with the eyes alone. It was found that within a few days after the lesion, eye and head movements in the direction of the target were initiated, but they were inadequate and had long latencies. Within 1 wk latencies had regained preoperative values. Parallel with the recovery on the behavioral task, head movements became more prominent than before the lesion. Four weeks after the lesion, peak velocity of the head movement had increased by a factor of two, whereas the duration showed a twofold decrease compared with head movements before the lesion. No effects were seen on the duration and peak velocity of gaze. After the recovery on the behavioral task had stabilized, a relative neglect in the hemifield contralateral to the lesion could still be demonstrated by simultaneously presenting two stimuli in the left and right visual hemifields. The neglect is not due to a sensory deficit, but to a disorder of programming. The recovery from unilateral neglect after a FEF lesion is the result of a different orienting behavior, in which head movements become more important. It is concluded that the FEF plays an important role in the organization and coordination of eye and head movements and that lesions of this area result in subtle but permanent changes in eye-head coordination.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document