Dry Environments: The Influence of Low Humidity on Comfort and Health

1987 ◽  
Vol 31 (10) ◽  
pp. 1101-1104
Author(s):  
Joseph E. Laviana ◽  
Frederick H. Rohles ◽  
Linda I. Hoffberg

Individuals are routinely subjected to dry environments. These conditions may result from geographic areas, the heating of indoor spaces, or specialized settings (e.g. commercial aircraft cabins). This paper examines the affect of low humidity from two perspectives: comfort and health. Results indicate that the dry-bulb temperature is only 7.8 times more important than relative humidity (rh) in determining the subjective thermal response, and that rh has a greater role in determining how men feel than how women feel. Additionally, it was shown that a perceivable level of annoyance is experienced by both wearers and nonwearers of soft contact lenses at or below 30% rh, and this effect becomes most pronounced after four hours. Other findings indicated that the perception of varying odor intensity levels (e.g., cigarette smoke) is higher in dry environments; several studies are also reported showing the health related benefits of humidification.

1988 ◽  
Vol 32 (6) ◽  
pp. 450-454
Author(s):  
Joseph E. Laviana ◽  
Frederick H. Rohles

The cabin of an inflight aircraft contains approximately 10% relative humidity (rh). To investigate the impact of this environment on eye comfort, an inflight humidity profile was simulated in a controlled laboratory setting. The experiment was replicated 3 times using a group of 4 subjects (2 males; 2 females) per test. Participants served in both control and experimental roles by wearing a hydrophilic contact lens on one eye and no lens on the other. Subjects provided evaluations of “eye comfort” for both eyes (contact and naked) at specified intervals during the 10 hour test. The results indicated that at 10% rh, there was no significant difference in eye comfort for either wearers or nonwearers of soft contact lenses. However, comfort decreased with the length of exposure (flight time), and for durations of six hours or longer a significant annoyance was reported.


2009 ◽  
Vol 21 (5) ◽  
pp. 46-50
Author(s):  
N. Pasechnikova ◽  
◽  
G. Drozhzhina ◽  
O. Ivanova ◽  
I. Nasinnik ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 117-120 ◽  
Author(s):  
T.N. Safonova ◽  
◽  
I.A. Novikov ◽  
V.I. Boev ◽  
O.V. Gladkova ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 548-554
Author(s):  
Nir Erdinest ◽  
Naomi London ◽  
Nadav Levinger ◽  
Yair Morad

The goal of this retrospective case series is to demonstrate the effectivity of combination low-dose atropine therapy with peripheral defocus, double concentric circle design with a center distance soft contact lenses at controlling myopia progression over 1 year of treatment. Included in this series are 3 female children aged 8–10 years with progressing myopia averaging −4.37 ± 0.88 D at the beginning of treatment. Their average annual myopic progression during the 3 years prior to therapy was 1.12 ± 0.75 D. They had not attempted any myopia control treatments prior to this therapy. The children were treated with a combination of 0.01% atropine therapy with spherical peripheral defocus daily replacement soft lenses MiSight<sup>®</sup> 1 day (Cooper Vision, Phoenix, AZ, USA). They underwent cycloplegic refraction, and a slit-lamp evaluation every 6 months which confirmed no adverse reactions or staining was present. Each of the 3 children exhibited an average of 0.25 ± 0.25 D of myopia progression at the end of 1 year of treatment. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first published study exhibiting that combining low-dose atropine and peripheral defocus soft contact lenses is effective at controlling children’s moderate to severe myopia progression during 1 year of therapy.


1989 ◽  
Vol 16 (6) ◽  
pp. 162-168 ◽  
Author(s):  
William G. Bachman ◽  
Bruce C. Leibrecht ◽  
John K. Crosley ◽  
Dudley R. Price ◽  
Patrick M. Leas ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document