scholarly journals Tobacco Use and Incidence of Tooth Loss among US Male Health Professionals

2007 ◽  
Vol 86 (4) ◽  
pp. 373-377 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Dietrich ◽  
N.N. Maserejian ◽  
K.J. Joshipura ◽  
E.A. Krall ◽  
R.I. Garcia
Keyword(s):  
Tobacco Use ◽  
Health Professionals ◽  
Tooth Loss ◽  
Time Dependent ◽  
Cox Models ◽  
Male Health ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Former Smokers ◽  
Never Smokers ◽  
Dose Dependent

Data on the dose-dependent effects of smoking and smoking cessation on tooth loss are scarce. We hypothesized that smoking has both dose- and time-dependent effects on tooth loss incidence. We used longitudinal data on tobacco use and incident tooth loss in 43,112 male health professionals, between 1986 and 2002. In multivariate Cox models, current smokers of 5 to 14 and 45+ cigarettes daily had a two-fold (HR, 1.94; 95% CI, 1.72, 2.18) and three-fold (HR, 3.05; 95% CI, 2.38, 3.90) higher risk of tooth loss, respectively, compared with never-smokers. Risk decreased with increasing time since cessation, but remained elevated by 20% (95% CI, 16%, 25%) for men who had quit 10+ years before. Current pipe/cigar smokers had a 20% (95% CI, 1.11, 1.30) increased risk of tooth loss compared with never- and former smokers of pipes/cigars.

Association between tobacco use, pain expression, and maladaptive coping among patients with advanced cancer.

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (26_suppl) ◽  
pp. 65-65
Author(s):  
Rony Dev ◽  
Yu Jung Kim ◽  
Akhila Sunkepally Reddy ◽  
David Hui ◽  
Kimberson Cochien Tanco ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Advanced Cancer ◽  
Tobacco Use ◽  
Symptom Expression ◽  
Advanced Cancer Patients ◽  
Maladaptive Coping ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Pain Expression ◽  
Former Smokers ◽  
Never Smokers

65 Background: Cancer patients who smoke have been reported to have higher pain expression and increased risk for opioid abuse. The purpose of our study is to evaluate the association between tobacco use, symptom expression, and maladaptive coping in advanced cancer patients. Methods: We prospectively enrolled advanced cancer patients evaluated in an outpatient Supportive Care Center and collected data on patient demographics, cancer diagnosis, morphine equivalent daily dose (MEDD), cigarette smoking status using Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, symptom expression as measured by Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale, Cut down/Annoyed/Guilty/Eye opener (CAGE alcoholism questionnaire), short form Screener and Opioid Assessment for Patients with Pain (SOAP-SF) survey, and Brief COPE Questionnaire. Results: Among399 patients, 195 (49%) were never smokers, 158 (40%) former smokers, and 46 (11%) current smokers. The most common malignancies were gastrointestinal (21.1%) and breast (19.5%). Never smokers were more likely to be female (p = 0.005). Current smokers expressed significantly higher pain scores at consultation than former or never smokers [median 7 vs. 6 vs. 5, respectively (p = 0.015)], increased MEDD (median 90 vs. 60 vs. 50, p = 0.002), and more likely to screen CAGE positive (33% vs. 24% vs. 8.7%, p < 0.0001). Compared with former and never smokers, current smokers were significantly more likely to cope with substance use (p = 0.02), denial (p = 0.007), and self-blame (< 0.0001), while both current and former smokers significantly more likely to use venting (p = 0.04). In addition, current smokers compared with former and never smokers were significantly more likely screen positive (≥ 4) on the SOAP-SF survey (74% vs. 13% vs. 9.3%, p = < 0.0001) and clinicians rated patients to be at higher risk for maladaptive coping (6.5% vs 2.5% vs. 1.5%, p = 0.003). Conclusions: In advanced cancer, current and former smokers were significantly more likely to have higher pain expression, CAGE positivity, and increased MEDD at consultation. In addition, a history of current or past tobacco use in advanced cancer patients was associated with increased risk of maladaptive coping.

scholarly journals Effect of smoking cessation on tooth loss: a systematic review with meta-analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Luisa Silveira Souto ◽  
Emanuel Silva Rovai ◽  
Cristina Cunha Villar ◽  
Mariana Minatel Braga ◽  
Cláudio Mendes Pannuti
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Smoking Cessation ◽  
Longitudinal Studies ◽  
Tooth Loss ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Former Smokers ◽  
Meta Regression ◽  
Never Smokers

Abstract Background Smoking is a major risk factor for periodontitis and tooth loss. Smoking cessation has a positive impact in periodontal treatment. However, so far, no systematic review has evaluated the effect of smoking cessation on tooth loss. Therefore, this review aimed to evaluate if smoking cessation reduces the risk of tooth loss. Methods Observational (cross-sectional and longitudinal) studies that investigated the association between smoking cessation and tooth loss were included. MEDLINE, EMBASE and LILACS databases were searched for articles published up to November 2018. Pooled results for subgroups of current and former smokers were compared in meta-analysis. Meta-regression was used to test the influence of smoking status on estimates and explore the heterogeneity. Results Of 230 potentially relevant publications, 21 studies were included in the qualitative review and 12 in the quantitative analysis. Meta-analysis of cross-sectional studies did not show any differences between former and current smokers in the chance of losing 1 or more teeth (OR = 1.00; 95% CI = 0.80 to 1.24, I2 = 80%), losing more than 8 teeth (OR = 1.02; 95% CI = 0.78 to 1.32, I2 = 0%) or being edentulous (OR = 1.37; 95% CI = 0.94 to 1.99, I2 = 98%). Meta-analysis from longitudinal studies showed that, when compared to never smokers, former smokers presented no increased risk of tooth loss (RR = 1.15; 95% CI = 0.98 to 1.35, I2 = 76%), while current smokers presented an increased risk of tooth loss (RR = 2.60; 95% CI = 2.29 to 2.96, I2 = 61%). Meta-regression showed that, among former smokers, the time of cessation was the variable that better explained heterogeneity (approximately 60%). Conclusions Risk for tooth loss in former smokers is comparable to that of never smokers. Moreover, former smokers have a reduced risk of tooth loss, when compared to current smokers.

Smoking and Hodgkin Lymphoma: A Meta-Analysis

Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 4829-4829
Author(s):  
Sheila Pascual ◽  
Cannon Milani ◽  
Joanna Mitri ◽  
Jorge Castillo
Keyword(s):  
Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
Tobacco Use ◽  
Case Reports ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Case Control ◽  
Current Smoker ◽  
Case Control Studies ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Former Smokers ◽  
Never Smokers

Abstract INTRODUCTION: The etiology of Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) is largely unknown. However, certain associations have been noted, such as familial factors and infection with viruses. Smoking has been associated with the development of multiple malignancies and some studies have reported an association between HL and smoking but the relationship of tobacco use with lymphomas in largely unclear. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the potential relationship between tobacco use and the development of HL using a meta-analysis methodology of retrospective, case-control studies. METHODS: An extensive search was conducted using Pubmed/MEDLINE through July 2008. Case-control studies that reported odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) or allow for those values to be calculated were included in our analysis. Case reports, editorials, letters to the editor, review articles and prospective studies were excluded. The smoking status was then subdivided in three groups: never smokers, former smokers and current smokers. Meta-analyses were performed comparing the risks of former and current smokers against the risk of never smokers of developing HL. Fixed and random effects models were used to assess for heterogeneity. RESULTS: Seven case-controls studies, accounting for 3201 cases and 15268 controls were included in the analysis. Most of the articles reported OR adjusted for age, sex and educational level. In former smokers, the OR was 0.73 (95% CI, 0.65 – 0.82) when compared to never smokers; no heterogeneity was detected. The current smoker group had an OR of 1.70 (95% CI, 1.36 – 2.13) when compared to the never smoker group; some heterogeneity was detected in this group (p &lt; 0.003, I2 = 69.6%). CONCLUSIONS: Despite the heterogeneity observed in the analysis, the current smoker group seems to have a 70% increased risk of developing HL. Although a cause-effect linkage between tobacco use and HL is difficult to prove, further basic and translational research is necessary to clarify the potential etiological role of smoking in HL.

scholarly journals Effect of Smoking Cessation On Tooth Loss: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Luisa Silveira Souto ◽  
Emanuel Silva Rovai ◽  
Cristina Cunha Villar ◽  
Mariana Minatel Braga ◽  
Claudio Mendes Pannuti
Keyword(s):  
Smoking Cessation ◽  
Tooth Loss ◽  
Positive Impact ◽  
Smoking Status ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Former Smokers ◽  
Meta Regression ◽  
Never Smokers

Abstract Background: Smoking is a major risk factor for periodontitis and tooth loss. Smoking cessation has a positive impact in periodontal treatment. However, so far, no systematic reviewhas evaluatedthe effect of smoking cessation on tooth loss. Therefore, this review aimed to evaluate if smoking cessation reduces the risk of tooth loss. Methods: Observational (cross-sectional and longitudinal) studiesthat investigated the association between smoking cessation and tooth loss were included. MEDLINE, EMBASE and LILACS databases were searched for articles published up to November 2018. Pooled results for subgroups of current and former smokers were compared in meta-analysis. Meta-regression was used to test the influence of smoking status on estimates and explore the heterogeneity. Results: Of 230 potentially relevant publications, 21 studies were included in the qualitative review and 12 in the quantitative analysis. Meta-analysis of cross-sectional studies did not show any differences between former and current smokers in the chance of losing 1 or more teeth (OR = 1.00; 95% CI = 0.80 to 1.24, I 2 = 80%), losing more than 8 teeth (OR = 1.02; 95% CI = 0.78 to 1.32, I 2 = 0%) or being edentulous (OR = 1.37; 95% CI = 0.94 to 1.99, I 2 = 98%). Meta-analysis from longitudinal studies showed that, when compared to never smokers, former smokers presented no increased risk of tooth loss (RR = 1.15; 95% CI = 0.98 to 1.35, I 2 = 76%), while current smokers presented an increased risk of tooth loss (RR = 2.60; 95% CI = 2.29 to 2.96, I 2 = 61%). Meta-regression showed that, among former smokers, the time of cessation was the variable that better explained heterogeneity (approximately 60%). Conclusions: Risk for tooth loss in former smokers is comparable to that of never smokers. Moreover, former smokers have a reduced risk of tooth loss, when compared to current smokers.

scholarly journals Tobacco use in the Myeloproliferative neoplasms: symptom burden, patient opinions, and care

BMC Cancer ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah F. Christensen ◽  
Robyn M. Scherber ◽  
Gina L. Mazza ◽  
Amylou C. Dueck ◽  
Nana Brochmann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Tobacco Use ◽  
Myeloproliferative Neoplasms ◽  
Myeloproliferative Neoplasm ◽  
Symptom Burden ◽  
Symptom Assessment ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Former Smokers ◽  
Never Smokers

Abstract Background Patients with Philadelphia-negative Myeloproliferative Neoplasms (MPN) suffer from numerous symptoms and decreased quality of life. Smoking is associated with an increased symptom burden in several malignancies. The aim of this study was to analyze the association between smoking and MPN-related symptom burden and explore MPN patients’ opinions on smoking. Methods A total of 435 patients with MPN participated in a cross-sectional internet-based survey developed by the Mayo Clinic and the Myeloproliferative Neoplasm Quality of Life Group. Patients reported their demographics, disease characteristics, tobacco use, and opinions on tobacco use. In addition, MPN-related symptoms were reported via the validated 10-item version of the Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Symptom Assessment Form. Results Current/former smokers reported worse fatigue (mean severity 5.6 vs. 5.0, p = 0.02) and inactivity (mean severity 4.0 vs. 3.4, p = 0.03) than never smokers. Moreover, current/former smokers more frequently experienced early satiety (68.5% vs. 58.3%, p = 0.03), inactivity (79.9% vs. 71.1%, p = 0.04), and concentration difficulties (82.1% vs. 73.1%, p = 0.04). Although not significant, a higher total symptom burden was observed for current/former smokers (mean 30.4 vs. 27.0, p = 0.07). Accordingly, overall quality of life was significantly better among never smokers than current/former smokers (mean 3.5 vs. 3.9, p = 0.03). Only 43.2% of the current/former smokers reported having discussed tobacco use with their physician, and 17.5% did not believe smoking increased the risk of thrombosis. Conclusion The current study suggests that smoking may be associated with increased prevalence and severity of MPN symptoms and underscores the need to enhance patient education and address tobacco use in the care of MPN patients.

scholarly journals Self-reported and cotinine-verified smoking and increased risk of incident hearing loss

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Woncheol Lee ◽  
Yoosoo Chang ◽  
Hocheol Shin ◽  
Seungho Ryu
Keyword(s):  
Smoking Status ◽  
Objective Measure ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Urinary Cotinine ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Former Smokers ◽  
Never Smokers ◽  
Time Varying Covariates ◽  
New Onset

AbstractWe examined the associations of smoking status and urinary cotinine levels, an objective measure of smoking, with the development of new-onset HL. This cohort study was performed in 293,991 Korean adults free of HL who underwent a comprehensive screening examination and were followed for up to 8.8 years. HL was defined as a pure-tone average of thresholds at 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 kHz ≥ 25 dB in both ears. During a median follow-up of 4.9 years, 2286 participants developed new-onset bilateral HL. Self-reported smoking status was associated with an increased risk of new-onset bilateral HL. Multivariable-adjusted HRs (95% CIs) for incident HL comparing former smokers and current smokers to never-smokers were 1.14 (1.004–1.30) and 1.40 (1.21–1.61), respectively. Number of cigarettes, pack-years, and urinary cotinine levels were consistently associated with incident HL. These associations were similarly observed when introducing changes in smoking status, urinary cotinine, and other confounders during follow-up as time-varying covariates. In this large cohort of young and middle-aged men and women, smoking status based on both self-report and urinary cotinine level were independently associated with an increased incidence of bilateral HL. Our findings indicate smoking is an independent risk factor for HL.

scholarly journals Mortality Risk and The Progression of The Electronic Frailty Index and Hospital Frailty Risk Score Over Time

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Joe Hollinghurst ◽  
Alan Watkins
Keyword(s):  
Risk Score ◽  
Frailty Index ◽  
Time Frame ◽  
Time Dependent ◽  
Cox Models ◽  
Hazard Ratios ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
The Matrix ◽  
Time Dependent Covariates ◽  
Over Time

IntroductionThe electronic Frailty Index (eFI) and the Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS) have been developed in primary and secondary care respectively. Objectives and ApproachOur objective was to investigate how frailty progresses over time, and to include the progression of frailty in a survival analysis.To do this, we performed a retrospective cohort study using linked data from the Secure Anonymised Information Linkage Databank, comprising 445,771 people aged 65-95 living in Wales (United Kingdom) on 1st January 2010. We calculated frailty, using both the eFI and HFRS, for individuals at quarterly intervals for 8 years with a total of 11,702,242 observations. ResultsWe created a transition matrix for frailty states determined by the eFI (states: fit, mild, moderate, severe) and HFRS (states: no score, low, intermediate, high), with death as an absorbing state. The matrix revealed that frailty progressed over time, but that on a quarterly basis it was most likely that an individual remained in the same state. We calculated Hazard Ratios (HRs) using time dependent Cox models for mortality, with adjustments for age, gender and deprivation. Independent eFI and HFRS models showed increased risk of mortality as frailty severity increased. A combined eFI and HFRS revealed the highest risk was primarily determined by the HFRS and revealed further subgroups of individuals at increased risk of an adverse outcome. For example, the HRs (95% Confidence Interval) for individuals with an eFI as fit, mild, moderate and severe with a high HFRS were 18.11 [17.25,19.02], 20.58 [19.93,21.24], 21.45 [20.85,22.07] and 23.04 [22.34,23.76] respectively with eFI fit and no HFRS score as the reference category. ConclusionFrailty was found to vary over time, with progression likely in the 8-year time-frame analysed. We refined HR estimates of the eFI and HFRS for mortality by including time dependent covariates.

Smoking is Associated with Increased Risk of Major Bleeding: A Prospective Cohort Study

2018 ◽  
Vol 119 (01) ◽  
pp. 039-047
Author(s):  
Anne Langsted ◽  
Børge Nordestgaard
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
Prospective Cohort Study ◽  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Prospective Cohort ◽  
Hazard Ratio ◽  
General Population Study ◽  
Smoking Intensity ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Former Smokers ◽  
Never Smokers

Background Tobacco smoking represents the most preventable cause of several fatal and disabling diseases worldwide. Several ingredients in tobacco have been suspected to cause changes in the arterial wall leading to instability of blood vessels. The association of smoking with major bleeding is largely unexplored. We tested the hypothesis that smoking and high tobacco consumption are associated with increased risk of bleeding. Materials and Methods This is a prospective cohort study with a mean follow-up of 5.9 years including 99,359 individuals from the Copenhagen General Population Study, with a questionnaire including self-reported smoking status and information on smoking intensity in cigarettes per day and pack-years. In this study, 17,555 were current smokers, 40,182 former smokers and 41,622 were never smokers. Results Multivariable adjusted hazard ratios for current smokers versus never smokers were 1.49 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.38–1.61) for any major bleeding, 1.71 (1.37–2.13) for intracranial bleeding, 1.35 (1.14–1.60) for airway bleeding, 2.20 (1.84–2.62) for gastrointestinal bleeding and 1.39 (1.26–1.55) for urinary bleeding. Increased smoking intensity was also associated with increased risk of any major bleeding, where > 40 pack-years in current and former smokers compared with never smokers had a multivariable adjusted hazard ratio of 1.59 (95% CI: 1.45–1.73) (p for trend across four groups: < 0.001). Also, current smokers smoking > 20 cigarettes per day compared with former and never smokers had a corresponding hazard ratio of 1.67 (1.51–1.85) (p for trend across four groups: < 0.001). Conclusion Current smokers have an increased risk of any major bleeding as well as of intracranial, airway, gastrointestinal and urinary bleeding. Also, increased smoking intensity was associated with increased risk of major bleeding.

Analysis of on-pack messages for e-liquids: a discrete choice study

2021 ◽  
pp. tobaccocontrol-2020-056033
Author(s):  
Janet Hoek ◽  
Philip Gendall ◽  
Christine Eckert ◽  
Jordan Louviere ◽  
Pamela Ling ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Discrete Choice ◽  
Latent Class ◽  
Logit Regression ◽  
Multinomial Logit Regression ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Former Smokers ◽  
Never Smokers ◽  
Discrete Channels ◽  
Analysis Models ◽  
Reduced Risk

BackgroundPolicymakers wishing to encourage smokers unable to quit to switch to using electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) also need to consider how to deter ENDS use among non-smokers. We examined whether reduced-risk messages could increase ENDS’ appeal among smokers and if increased-risk messages could decrease appeal among susceptible non-smokers, occasional and former smokers.MethodologyAn online discrete choice experiment tested three attributes: information message, nicotine content (0 mg or 3 mg) and flavour (tobacco, menthol or fruit). The sample comprised 352 current smokers, 118 occasional and former smokers, and 216 ENDS-susceptible never smokers. Smokers viewed reduced-risk messages that encouraged switching to ENDS, while other groups viewed increased-risk messages that discouraged ENDS use. All groups saw a typical addiction warning. We analysed the data by estimating multinomial logit regression and adjusted latent class analysis models.ResultsRelative to no message, reduced risk-messages increased the appeal of ENDS uptake among one class of smokers (33.5%) but decreased appeal among other smokers. However, among all smokers, reduced-risk messages increased preference more than a dissuasive addiction warning. By contrast, among occasional or former smokers, and susceptible non-smokers, all information messages discouraging ENDS use, including an addiction warning, decreased preference relative to no message.ConclusionsOn-pack relative-risk messages about ENDS could make transition more attractive to smokers while increased-risk messages could deter ENDS uptake among susceptible non-smokers, occasional and former smokers. Communicating diverse messages via discrete channels could recognise heterogeneity among and between smokers and non-smokers.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document