Modified Stapled Transanal Rectal Resection Procedure for Limited Rectal Prolapse: A Viable Alternative to the Delorme Operation

2020 ◽  
pp. 155335062092947
Author(s):  
Hua-Xian Chen ◽  
Zu-Qing Chen ◽  
Liang Huang ◽  
Chang-Peng Han ◽  
Ruo-Xu Dou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Loss ◽  
Rectal Prolapse ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Rectal Resection ◽  
Stapled Transanal Rectal Resection ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Delorme’S Procedure ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Delorme's Procedure ◽  
Group 1

Purpose. The optimal surgical approach for full-thickness rectal prolapse (FTRP) remains controversial. In China, patients with limited FTRP (<5 cm in length) are usually managed by perineal surgery. We retrospectively assessed the outcome of Delorme’s procedure and compared it with modified stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR). Methods. The study was conducted in 2 public tertiary referral centers in China with modified STARR or Delorme's procedure performed by experienced surgeons. Outcomes assessed recurrence, operative times, blood loss, complications, length of hospital stay, and continence and constipation scoring. Results. Between December 2012 and May 2019, 65 patients were assessed, including 48 with modified STARR (group 1) and 17 with Delorme’s procedure (group 2). The median follow-up was 22 months (range, 3-86 months). The mean operative time for group 1 was 37.4 ± 17.5 minutes vs 74.3 ± 30.6 minutes for group 2 ( P < .001). The blood loss for group 1 was significantly lower than that for group 2 (17.4 ± 15.9 mL vs 27.8 ± 16.7 mL, respectively; P = .028). There was no significant difference between groups in recurrence (group 1 18.8% vs group 2 23.5%; P = .944) with no effect of operation type. Both procedures showed improvement in constipation and continence scoring with a similar impact. Conclusions. Modified STARR and the Delorme operation are comparable in managing limited FTRP with superior results in operative time and blood loss for STARR.

scholarly journals Evaluation of Delorme’s Procedure in the Treatment of Complete Rectal Prolapse- A Comparison with Abdominal Rectopexy (Well’s procedure)

2021 ◽  
Vol 34 (1) ◽  
pp. 40-46
Author(s):  
Md Ariful Alam Suman ◽  
Md Habibullah Sarkar ◽  
Istiak Ahmed ◽  
Sulatanul Abedin ◽  
Md Shohidul Islam ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Prolapse ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
P Value ◽  
Complete Rectal Prolapse ◽  
Advantages And Disadvantages ◽  
Group I ◽  
Abdominal Rectopexy ◽  
Delorme’S Procedure ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Delorme's Procedure

Background: There are versatile operative techniques for treating complete rectal prolapse. Every procedure has some advantages and disadvantages. Delorme’s procedure and abdominal rectopexy (Well’s procedure) have gained more popularity. But to determine which approach is better, it is needed to evaluate the functional outcome of both procedures. Objective: To compare the outcome of Delorme’s procedure and abdominal rectopexy to treat complete rectal prolapse. Methodology: A randomized control trial was conducted in 25 patients with complete rectal prolapse in the department of Surgery, RMCH. They were divided into two groups by randomization. Fifteen patients included in Group-I underwent Delorme’s procedure, and ten patients included in group-II underwent abdominal rectopexy (Well’s procedure). The outcome of both procedures was compared postoperatively.  Results: In group-1, we have found uneventful outcomes of 10 (66.66%) patients, and hemorrhage, minor incontinence, and retention of urine were found in 2(13.3%), 1(6.66), and 4(26.66%) patients, respectively. In group-2 patients, 5(50%) patients recovered uneventfully, whereas hemorrhage, surgical site infection, retention of urine, bladder dysfunction, and constipation were found in 2(20%), 1(10%), 1(10%), 1(10%) and 2(20%) patients respectively. The mean operation time in group-I was 92.86 min and in Group 2 was 124.00 min with a p-value of 0.001. The average post-operative hospital stay after Delorme’s procedure was <4 days in 4 patients and 4-6 days in the rest 11 patients. But the hospital stay is a little lengthier in the case of abdominal rectopexy (Well’s procedure), where seven patients were discharged within 4-6 days, and three patients were discharged after the 5th day of operation. In group I, expenditure was <7000 taka in 10 (66.66%) patients, whereas in group-2 , the cost was 10000-15000 in 7(70%) patients with a p-value of 0.001. Conclusion: We can conclude that Delorme’s procedure is comparatively safer and cost-effective than Well’s procedure, considering different vital parameters. TAJ 2021; 34: No-1: 40-46

scholarly journals Application of Desmopressin and conjugated estrogens to reduce the volume of blood loss during arthroplsty of the hip joint in patients with end stage renal disease

2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 57-63
Author(s):  
N. E. Mushtin ◽  
A. N. Tsed ◽  
A. K. Dulaev ◽  
A. A. Lednev ◽  
K. G. Iljushenko ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Body Weight ◽  
Renal Replacement Therapy ◽  
Kidney Disease ◽  
Blood Loss ◽  
Replacement Therapy ◽  
Hip Joint ◽  
Conjugated Estrogens ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Group 1

The objective was to determine the possibilities of using desmopressin and conjugated estrogens during primary hip joint arthroplasty in patients receiving renal replacement therapy.Methods and materials. The material for the study was data on 53 patients with pathology of the hip joint, who underwent primary arthroplasty from 2016 to 2018. All patients were divided into 2 groups. Group 1 (n=23) – patients not suffering from kidney diseases. Group 2 (n=30) – patients receiving renal replacement therapy. Each group was divided into 2 subgroups: 1 subgroup – comparisons, where the combination of desmopressin/conjugated estrogens was not used. 2 subgroup – control, where desmopressin was used at a dosage of 0.4 mg/kg 2 hours before the incision, conjugated estrogens was used at a dosage of 0.6 mg / kg of body weight within 5 days before the operation.Results. In group 1 (patients not suffering from kidney disease), there was no statistically significant difference between the subgroups. In group 2 (patients receiving hemodialysis), there was a statistically significant difference in the volume of blood loss. Thus, in the subgroup without using additional techniques, the volume of intraoperative blood loss was 769.5±389.3 ml; in the second subgroup (using desmopressin and estrogens) – 479.1±245.2 ml. The difference was statistically significant, p<0.05. The efficiency was 27.9 %.Conclusion. The additional use of conjugated estrogens at a dose of 0.6 mg/kg of body weight within 5 days before the operation, desmopressin at a dose of 0.4 mg/kg of body weight 2 hours before the incision reduced blood loss by 27.9 %. The use of combination of conjugated estrogens and desmopressin in patients not suffering from kidney disease did not affect the amount of blood loss.

Effect of Sustained Uterine Compression versus Uterine Massage on Blood Loss after Vaginal Delivery: A Randomized Controlled Trial

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Labib M. Ghulmiyyah ◽  
Alaa El-Husheimi ◽  
Ihab M. Usta ◽  
Cristina Colon-Aponte ◽  
Ghina Ghazeeri ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Loss ◽  
Vaginal Delivery ◽  
Postpartum Hemorrhage ◽  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Dropout Rate ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Uterine Massage ◽  
Secondary Outcomes ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Group 1

Objective This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of sustained uterine compression versus uterine massage in reducing blood loos after a vaginal delivery. Study Design This was a prospective randomized trial conducted at the American University of Beirut Medical Center (AUBMC) between October 2015 and October 2017. Inclusion criteria were women with a singleton pregnancy at ≥36 weeks of gestation, with less than three previous deliveries, who were candidates for vaginal delivery. Participants were randomized into two groups, a sustained uterine compression group (group 1) and a uterine massage group (group 2). Incidence of postpartum hemorrhage (blood loss of ≥500 mL) was the primary outcome. We assumed that the incidence of postpartum hemorrhage at our institution is similar to previously published studies. A total of 545 women were required in each arm to detect a reduction from 9.6 to 4.8% in the primary outcome (50% reduction) with a one-sided α of 0.05 and a power of 80%. Factoring in a 10% dropout rate. Secondary outcomes were admission to intensive care unit (ICU), postpartum complications, drop in hemoglobin, duration of hospital stay, maternal pain, use of uterotonics, or of surgical procedure for postpartum hemorrhage. Results A total of 550 pregnant women were recruited, 273 in group 1 and 277 in group 2. There was no statistically significant difference in baseline characteristics between the two groups. Type of anesthesia, rate of episiotomy, lacerations, and mean birth weight were also equal between the groups. Incidence of the primary outcome was not different between the two groups (group 1: 15.5%, group 2: 15.4%; p = 0.98). There was no statistically significant difference in any of the secondary outcomes between the two groups, including drop in hemoglobin (p = 0.79). Conclusion There was no difference in blood loss between sustained uterine compression and uterine massage after vaginal delivery. Key Points

scholarly journals Flexible Ureteroscopy Can Be More Efficacious in the Treatment of Proximal Ureteral Stones in Select Patients

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erdal Alkan ◽  
Ali Sarıbacak ◽  
Ahmet Oguz Ozkanli ◽  
Mehmet Murad Basar ◽  
Oguz Acar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Operative Time ◽  
Flexible Ureteroscopy ◽  
Ureteral Stones ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Ureteral Avulsion ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Stone Characteristics ◽  
Ureteral Rupture ◽  
Treatment Procedures ◽  
Group 1

Purpose. We aimed to compare and evaluate the outcomes and complications of two endoscopic treatment procedures, semirigid ureteroscopy (SR-URS) and flexible ureteroscopy (F-URS), in the treatment of proximal ureteral stones (PUS).Methods. SR-URS (group 1) was done on 68 patients whereas 64 patients underwent F-URS (group 2) for the treatment of PUS. Success rate was defined as the absence of stone fragments or presence of asymptomatic insignificant residual fragments < 2 mm. Outcomes and complications were recorded.Results. The differences were statistically not significant in age, gender, body mass index (BMI), and stone characteristics between groups. Mean ureteral stone size was 9.1 ± 0.4 mm and 8.9 ± 0.5 mm for groups 1 and 2. Mean operative time was 34.1 ± 1.5 min and 49.4 ± 2.3 min for groups 1 and 2 (p=0.001). SFRs were 76.5% and 87.5% for groups 1 and 2 (p=0.078). Two major complications (ureteral avulsion and ureteral rupture) occurred in group 1.Conclusion. F-URS is safer and less invasive than SR-URS in patients with PUS. There is no statistically significant difference in the efficacy of either technique. Nonetheless we recommend F-URS in the management of PUS as a first-line treatment option in select cases of proximal ureteral calculi.

Role of Frameless Stereotaxy in the Surgical Treatment of Cerebral Arteriovenous Malformations: Technique and Outcomes in a Controlled Study of 44 Consecutive Patients

Neurosurgery ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 51 (5) ◽  
pp. 1108-1118 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen M. Russell ◽  
Henry H. Woo ◽  
Seth S. Joseffer ◽  
Jafar J. Jafar
Keyword(s):  
Blood Loss ◽  
Arteriovenous Malformations ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Frameless Stereotaxy ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Cerebral Arteriovenous Malformations ◽  
Estimated Blood Loss ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Group 1

Abstract OBJECTIVE To describe a frameless stereotactic technique used to resect cerebral arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) and to determine whether frameless stereotaxy during AVM resection could decrease operative times, minimize intraoperative blood losses, reduce postoperative complications, and improve surgical outcomes. METHODS Data for 44 consecutive patients with surgically resected cerebral AVMs were retrospectively reviewed. The first 22 patients underwent resection without stereotaxy (Group 1), whereas the next 22 patients underwent resection with the assistance of a frameless stereotaxy system (Group 2). RESULTS The patient characteristics, AVM morphological features, and percentages of preoperatively embolized cases were statistically similar for the two treatment groups. The mean operative time for Group 1 was 497 minutes, compared with 290 minutes for Group 2 (P = 0.0005). The estimated blood loss for Group 1 was 657 ml, compared with 311 ml for Group 2 (P = 0.0008). Complication rates, residual AVM incidences, and clinical outcomes were similar for the two groups. CONCLUSION Frameless stereotaxy allows surgeons to 1) plan the optimal trajectory to an AVM, 2) minimize the skin incision and craniotomy sizes, and 3) confirm the AVM margins and identify deep vascular components during resection. These benefits of stereotaxy were most apparent for small, deep AVMs that were not visible on the surface of the brain. Frameless stereotaxy reduces the operative time and blood loss during AVM resection.

scholarly journals OUTCOMES OF VIDEO ASSISTED THORACOSCOPIC DECORTICATION VERSUS CONVENTIONAL OPEN DECORTICATION IN PATIENTS WITH STAGE II OR STAGE III EMPYEMA

2021 ◽  
Vol 71 (4) ◽  
pp. 1261-64
Author(s):  
Ibrahim Baloch ◽  
Bilal Umair ◽  
Asif Asghar ◽  
Muhammad Imtiaz Khan ◽  
Muhammad Shoaib Hanif ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Loss ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
P Value ◽  
Video Assisted ◽  
Post Operative Pain ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Group 1

Objective: To compare outcomes of video assisted Thoracoscopic Decortication (VATD) with conventional open decortication (COD) in patients with stage–II or stage–III empyema thoracic. Study Design: Prospective comparative study. Place and Duration of Study: Department of Thoracic Surgery, Combined Military Hospital, Rawalpindi, Pakistan, from Jun 2018 to May 2019. Methodology: A total 60 patients underwent in this study. Patients of both gender who reported for decortication of empyema thoracic were evaluated. All patients diagnosed to have Stage II or III empyema with age 25-50 years were studied for outcomes. All patients were evaluated for operative time, blood loss, post-operative pain, pneumonitis, duration of airleak and post-operative drainage, duration of chest drains and length of hospital stay. Results: Mean operative time in group-1 was 133.63 ± 8.55 min and in group-2 was 147.83 ± 10.36 min (p-value 0.037). Mean blood loss in group-1 was 296.66 ± 46.11 while in group-2 was 207.30 ± 53.81. Post-operative pain score on VAS for pain was 5.8 ± 1.7 for group-1 and 4.06 ± 1.4 for group-2 (p-value 0.032). Chest tubes were retained for an average of 5.58 ± 0.8 days in group-1 while 3.86 ± 0.8 days in group-2 (p-value <0.001). Conclusion: Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery Decortication is superior to open decortication in operative management of Stage II and Stage III Empyema thoracic in terms of post op pain, duration of chest intubation, air leak and hospital stay of the patient.

scholarly journals Use of Holmium YAG laser in circumcision: a novel, less complicated and alternative procedure for adolescent

2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Pei-Lin Huang ◽  
I-Ching Lee ◽  
De-Chan Tsai ◽  
Jen-Ho Tsai ◽  
Vincent F. S. Tsai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Operative Time ◽  
Alternative Procedure ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Yag Laser ◽  
Young Males ◽  
Estimated Blood Loss ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Average Operative Time ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Group 1

Abstract Background To evaluate the efficacy and safety of Holmium YAG laser circumcision in adolescents. Methods Eighty-one patients underwent circumcision for medical reasons, and patients’ requests were collected retrospectively during February 2017 to February 2019. They were divided into two groups: Holmium YAG laser (group 1, n = 41) and conventional group (group 2, n = 40). The guillotine method with a Holmium YAG laser was applied for circumcisions, and all the procedures were performed by a single urologist who was well-experienced with circumcision practices. Results The average age of group 1 was 15.53 ± 7.35 years old, and the average age was 16.34 ± 9.22 years old in group 2. There was no significant difference in age and indications. The average operative time was significantly shorter in group 1 than in group 2 (24.40 ± 3.94 vs. 27.25 ± 4.35 min, p < 0.01). The estimated blood loss was less in group 1 compared to group 2. There were fewer complications in group 1 than in group 2 (3/41 vs. 10/40, p < 0.01) and patients also felt less pain in group 1 (p < 0.01). All patients tolerated this procedure without severe side effects. Conclusions The use of Holmium YAG laser in circumcision is a novel, less complicated, easy, and less painful alternative procedure for circumcision in young males.

scholarly journals Comparative evaluation of intracorporeal lithotripsy techniques during ureteroscopy: a clinical experience

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (11) ◽  
pp. 3581
Author(s):  
Pankaj Trivedi
Keyword(s):  
Migration Rate ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Laser Lithotripsy ◽  
Female Ratio ◽  
Pneumatic Lithotripsy ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Stone Migration ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Group 1

Background: The objective of the study was to compare pneumatic lithotripsy and laser lithotripsy techniques for safety, efficacy, and complications in the management of ureteric stone.Methods: Patients underwent ureteroscopy for ureteral stones in a tertiary care teaching hospital were divided into 2 groups of 50 each. Group 1 patients underwent pneumatic lithotripsy and group 2 underwent holmium:yttrium-aluminium-garnet (Ho: YAG) laser lithotripsy. Both the groups were compared regarding demographic characteristics, stone dimensions, number of stones, operative time, stone migration rate, application of post-operative double J (DJ) stent, complications, and stone free rate.Results: Mean age of the patients in the group 1, and group 2 were 45.74±18.49, and 44.5±14.33 years, respectively (p=0.709). There was no significant difference in male to female ratio in both groups. Total operative times were found 29.12±10.83 min, and 28.44±7.49 min in the group 1 and group 2, respectively which was statistically non-significant (p=0.716). The stone free rate was 100% and 98% in group 1 and 2 respectively (p=0.130). Stone migration was also found in 5 (10%) patients in the group 1 and 1 (2%) in group 2 which was found statistically significant (p=0.037). Mucosal damage was found 3 (6%) in laser group as compared to 1 (2%) in pneumatic group. No significant difference between complications was seen in both the groups.Conclusions: This study concluded that pneumatic lithotripsy and laser lithotripsy have similar efficacy in terms of operative time, success rate and hospital stay time. However, stone migration rate was significantly more in pneumatic lithotripsy.

scholarly journals Functional outcome of long proximal femoral nail versus short proximal femoral nail in peritrochanteric fractures

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sanjeev Gupta ◽  
Pallav Gupta ◽  
Gagandeep Singh Raina ◽  
Manoj Kumar ◽  
Gagandeep Singh
Keyword(s):  
Blood Loss ◽  
Functional Outcome ◽  
Proximal Femoral Nail ◽  
Surgical Time ◽  
Femoral Nail ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Intramedullary Implant ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Surgical Duration ◽  
Group 1

Background: Proximal femoral nail (PFN) is an intramedullary implant which has been commonly used in the fixation of intertrochanteric fractures. However, controversy comes about the effect of nail length on fracture union and other complications. A comparative evaluation of surgical treatment and functional outcome of patients with peritrochanteric fractures treated with short versus long PFN.Methods:  Total of 100 patients have been included in study out of which 57 belonged to group 1 and were operated with short PFN and rest 43 were group 2 operated with long PFN. Patients were followed up for 6 months and were compared on various parameters.Results: There is no significant difference noted in the two group. However, the surgical duration and blood loss for short PFN was significantly less as compared to long PFN.Conclusions: Short PFN is better implant for peritrochantric fractures both stable and unstable with quicker surgical time and lesser blood loss.

scholarly journals The “no-touch” technique in the flexible ureteroscopic approach of renal stones

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 481-486
Author(s):  
Bogdan Geavlete ◽  
◽  
◽  
◽  
Cosmin Cozma ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Operative Time ◽  
Renal Stones ◽  
Flexible Ureteroscopy ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Single Use ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Sheath Insertion ◽  
Meta Analyses ◽  
Group 1 ◽  
Wall Lesions

Large meta-analyses demonstrated that ureteral access sheaths (UAS) have specific complications during and after flexible ureteroscopy (fURS). The present study focused on the technical aspects, advantages, drawbacks, and limitations of the latest “no-touch” technique (NTT) in the flexible ureteroscopic therapeutic approach of renal stones. A total of 288 patients with a single pyelocaliceal stone (largest diameter between 11 and 29 mm) underwent fURS: 144 using the 12/14 Fr UAS (group 1) and 144 without UAS (group 2). For NTT, we used four types of ureteroscopes: Olympus URF-V2 (8.5 Fr) – 33 cases, Storz Flex X2 (8.4 Fr) – 60 cases, single-use PUSEN PU 3022 (9.5 Fr) – 37 cases, and single-use PUSEN – PU 3033A (7.5 Fr) – 14 cases. For group 1, we used the Olympus URF–V2 ureteroscope in 44 cases, the Storz Flex X2 in 58 cases, and the single-use PUSEN PU 3022 in 42 cases. We compared the operative time, hospitalization periods, and complications. Successful access sheath insertion was noted in 83.3% of cases from group 1, and successful ureteroscope insertion was noted in 90.9% of cases from group 2. The average operative time was slightly higher in group 1 vs. group 2 (47 vs. 39 min). Stone-free rates (SFRs) were overall lower in group 2 (76.3% vs. 86.8%) at 1 month. At 3 months, we did not find a significant difference between these two groups. Superficial mucosal ureteral wall lesions were found in 38.8% of patients from group 1 and 4.1% from group 2. Hospitalization periods were longer in group 1 vs. group 2 (21 vs. 29 hours, respectively). The single-use 7.5 Fr ureteroscope should receive a special mention: the insertion was simple, we did not encounter any mucosal ureteral wall lesions, and all patients were discharged on the same day. Despite the clear advantages of routine UAS usage, there are many adverse events for the patient. Larger diameter sheaths involve a greater risk of ureteral wall injury. NTT seems to improve peri- and postoperative safety while preserving therapeutic efficiency. The new 7.5 Fr ureteroscopes appear to optimize surgical efficiency and diminish complications in the flexible ureteroscopic treatment of renal stones.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document