scholarly journals EPS mid-career prize lecture 2017: Writing systems, reading, and language

2019 ◽  
Vol 72 (4) ◽  
pp. 677-692 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathleen Rastle

Skilled reading reflects an accumulation of experience with written language. Written language is typically viewed as an expression of spoken language, and this perspective has motivated approaches to understanding reading and reading acquisition. However, in this article, I develop the proposal that written language has diverged from spoken language in important ways that maximise the transmission of meaningful information, and that this divergence has been central to the development of rapid, skilled reading. I use English as an example to show that weaknesses in the relationship between spelling and sound can give rise to strong regularities between spelling and meaning that are critical for the rapid analysis of printed words. I conclude by arguing that the nature of the reading system is a reflection of the writing system and that a deep understanding of reading can be obtained only through a deep understanding of written language.

Author(s):  
Kathy Rastle

Writing is a relatively recent cultural invention, and reading is a skill that requires years of instruction, dedication, and practice. My talk will consider how the nature of a writing system influences reading acquisition and skilled reading. I consider the nature of statistical regularities that characterize English orthography and show across several experiments that knowledge encoded in the skilled reading system mirrors these regularities. This analysis reveals that weaknesses in the relationship between spelling and sound give rise to powerful regularities between spelling and meaning that are critical for text comprehension. I conclude by thinking about how written language differs from spoken language and argue that these differences may be at the heart of human capacity for rapid, skilled reading.


2018 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 26-51
Author(s):  
Eugene Buckley

Abstract It is generally accepted that the units of writing systems represent categories found in spoken language; in phonographic writing, these categories traditionally include the syllable and segment, which correspond to syllabic and alphabetic systems. But it has been claimed that some or most “syllabaries” are actually based on moras, well known from phonological theory as units of syllable weight. I argue that apparent moraic systems are in fact built on signs that stand for core CV syllables, and consequently that moras do not appear to play a central role in any writing system.


2015 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Neef

AbstractThis paper gives an outline of the Modular Theory of Writing Systems by answering the question: what are the elements or modules that are necessary for a writing system to work? A writing system is a notational system for a natural language. Based on this characterization, it is obvious that a necessary component of a writing system is a specific language system. What eventually constitutes a writing system in addition to this language system is a device that, put simply, relates units of a language system to units of a script. This component is termed ‘graphematics’ in the present framework and is regarded as a necessary module of a writing system. Above that, another typical component of writing systems, namely ‘systematic orthography’, applies to the ‘graphematic solution space’ and restricts the spelling possibilities of specific words in accordance to their belonging to a specific level of the vocabulary of the language. Supplemented by reflections on the status of scripts as well as of IPA as a writing system, an answer is finally given to the pertinent question how spoken language and written language are related to each other. The answer is that this relation is of a considerably indirect nature.


2011 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 251-274 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gijsbert Rutten ◽  
Marijke J. van der Wal

In historical sociolinguistics, it is often assumed that ego-documents such as private letters represent the spoken language of the past as closely as possible. In this paper, we will try to determine the degree of orality of seventeenth-century Dutch private letters: the degree to which the spoken local dialect is represented in these texts, and at the same time, the extent to which scribes possibly converged towards supralocal writing systems. We study the orthographical representation of four phonemes in a corpus of letters from the provinces of Holland and Zeeland. Clear cases of local writing practices are revealed, contributing to our knowledge of the spoken language in the past, as well as to the different ways in which it was represented in written language. However, the degree to which local features appear in the corpus is remarkably low. Only a minority of the letters contains localizable features, and if a letter contains these, it is usually only in a minority of the positions which, historically, were phonologically possible. We conclude that, in general, scribes did not aim to write their local dialect, but employed an intended supraregional variety instead. Keywords: Historical sociolinguistics; Dutch, seventeenth century; ego-documents; letters; writing systems; historical phonology; language from below; orality


2020 ◽  
Vol 34 (10) ◽  
pp. 13941-13942
Author(s):  
Shresth Verma ◽  
Joydip Dhar

Learning to communicate is considered an essential task to develop a general AI. While recent literature in language evolution has studied emergent language through discrete or continuous message symbols, there has been little work in the emergence of writing systems in artificial agents. In this paper, we present a referential game setup with two agents, where the mode of communication is a written language system that emerges during the play. We show that the agents can learn to coordinate successfully using this mode of communication. Further, we study how the game rules affect the writing system taxonomy by proposing a consistency metric.


Author(s):  
Agnes Kukulska-Hulme

• Why are electronic texts suspect? • Can you tear out a page on a screen? • How does chopping up sentences make them coherent? • When do actions speak louder than words? • How can we use questions to map out knowledge needs? . . . We begin this chapter by looking at what is to be gained from understanding the relationship between written and spoken language. The consequences of putting words on the screen are explored, in terms of changes in the meaning of terms, pronunciation, and the effect of spatial proximity on meanings. We then move on to consider aspects of verbal interaction, such as politeness and fluency, and conclude with an overview of users’ knowledge needs identified by analyzing their language. Written texts all have to be related somehow, directly or indirectly, to the world of sound, the natural habitat of language, to yield their meanings. The world of sound as “the natural habitat of language.” Historically, and in an individual’s development, speech comes before writing. For a small child, language is all speech. This is obviously not so for older children and adults, and for some, language is nearly all reading and writing. Still, for most people, language is strongly associated with sound, in a concrete way through hearing and producing language as well as through mental association. In a situation where computers are used, spoken and written language are both present in some way (not necessarily at the same time), not least of all because it is most unusual for someone to use an application without ever speaking about its use! In general, indirect reference from written language to sound through a reader’s prior experience of spoken language or through a special notation is acceptable in many different circumstances, such as in books and newspapers. The question is, What, if anything, do we lose when real sound is missing? Physical demands on the reader (user) are now focused on visual processing.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andi Asrifan

Often speaking of 'language' means speaking (speaking language), often writing (written language). How different are they? Of course, while writing is written and read, speech is spoken and heard. But the variations are far more:Levels. Age. Speech goes back, maybe a million years ago, to human origins. The writing, however, is relatively new; first invented by the Sumerians, around 3200 B.C. in Mesopotamia. Since then, the concept of writing has spread globally and in various parts of the world different writing systems have developed.All-encompassing. People will talk everywhere. However, people were not literate until the Sumerian invention. Even now, in officially literate communities, there are many non-literate classes (e.g. New Guinea) and many non-literate citizens.Procurement. People all over the first two years of their life start talking, perhaps many of the skills involved are innate rather than acquired. Writing generally builds on language learning.Structural stages. Two forms of fundamental units are speaking: 'phonemes' or sound units that are meaningless by themselves are combined into 'morphemes' that have a meaning; thus phonemes /b/, /i/ and /t form a bit. It functions the same way alphabetically scripts. In a different type of script, the syllabary, the fundamental unit, refers to a spoken syllable. For example, in the logo script. Each Chinese character is a whole morphema (usually a word). (See Daniels and Bright 1996 for more detail on scripts.)Interdependence. Interdependence. In either speech or writing, most literate persons can convey the same messages, but speech usually transmits more explicit information than writing. Hebrew and Arabic consonants show, but sometimes omit vowel symbols. In Chinese, the words corresponding symbols can offer no or only partial signals of pronunciation. The written and spoken forms of a given language appear to fit and may influence each other on one or more occasions, as if 'through' means 'through' On the other hand, people may pronounce the 't' in spelling pronunciation "often" even though it was lost historically. Some formal literary types, such as classical Chinese, have a written and direct relationship to expression.Power to retrace. Speech cannot be recorded or stored until a magnetic recorder is invented, except by failing memory and writing. But for thousands of years writing can be maintained. Its continuity has made human structures such as libraries, histories, timelines, dictionaries, menus and what we commonly term "civilization" possible.Literary use. Literary use. Non-literate cultures have orally written and memorized customs – songs, ceremonies, stories, myths. These texts may be referred to as oral literature. In comparison, writing allows for the most commonly called 'literature,' i.e. text bodies that are far larger and codified than memory allows. But dramatic performance and aloud reading remain important traditions, even in literate societies.Prestige. Prestige. Written language, which is all highly prestigious, is linked by political and economic powers, admirable literary and educational institutions. People often think their written language as central in literate societies; they see the word as less than it is. However, writing is more cold or impersonal than voice.Normalization. The languages spoken have dialects—forms that differ from geographical to social areas. However, the need for communication promotes progress to a single written, governmental, education and literary standard in complex societies which use writing. The reputation of the written standard would also have an effect on speech.Formality. Formality. It can be formal or informal to interact. Writing may be associated in literary cultures with formal and informal forms. In formal circumstances (oratory, sermons), a person may "speak like a book" and adapt written style. Formal and informal forms, for example in Arabic, can be quite distinct and can be virtually separate languages.Shift. Change. Change. Spoken language is continuously evolving everywhere, and speakers may still be largely unknown about it. Written language has changed even less than its pronunciation since Chaucer's time due to it's consistency and standardization and slower and less sweeping changes. The elements of formality and prestige in turn are related to this.


ULUMUNA ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 369-384
Author(s):  
Jamaluddin Jamaluddin

A great number of classical intellectual treatises, usually called manuscripts, can be found in Lombok, an island in West Nusa Tenggara province. All the manuscripts indicate that writing tradition has been growing in this island since a long time ago. Of many factors influenced the growing of that tradition is trade relationship between Lombok traders and those from other islands. Some significant contributions can be traced through languages ever used in oral communication and in works produced in the community i.e. Sasak, Java, Bali, and Malay, Sanskrit, Arabics. The relationship also contributed to rising intellectual activity and enriching contents of the manuscripts. This article observes historical sides of the writing tradition by providing historical data, epigraphs and other supporting resources that made the writing tradition exist. The article tradition in Sasak community is predicted to have been started since the Sasak people recognized writing system, and have developed hundreds of years ago, producing thousands of manuscripts in some different languages, titles and forms.The writing systems used were varied such as old Javanese, Arab, Bali and Bugis. And the languages used were old Java, Java, Bali, Arabic and Malay. This indicates that, long time ago, Sasak people had made contact with people from many parts of this archipelago like Bali, Java, Malay and even Celebes (Bugis).


2022 ◽  
pp. 136-160
Author(s):  
Daniel R. Espinas ◽  
Min Wang ◽  
Yixun Li

This chapter discusses orthographic learning, i.e., how children learn the relation between their spoken language and writing system. The process is discussed for children learning to read and write in one language, as well as for multilingual children acquiring literacy in more than one language. In both cases, the developmental course is mapped from children's first insights into the form and function of their writing systems to the development of word-specific mental representations that code for multiple linguistic forms (i.e., sound, spelling, and meaning). The chapter concludes with instructional recommendations for supporting children's orthographic learning throughout development.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document