EXPRESS: Off-hour effect on time metrics and clinical outcomes in endovascular treatment for large vessel occlusion, a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background There is an ongoing debate on the off-hour effect on endovascular treatment (EVT) for acute large vessel occlusion (LVO). Aims This meta-analysis aimed to compare time metrics and clinical outcomes of acute LVO patients who presented/were treated during off-hour with those during working hours. Summary of review Structured searches on the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases were conducted through February 23rd, 2021. The primary outcomes were onset to door, door to imaging, door to puncture, puncture to recanalization, procedural time, successful recanalization, symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (SICH), mortality in hospital, good prognosis (90-day modified Rankin Scale [mRS] score 0-2), and 90-day mortality. The secondary outcomes were imaging to puncture, onset to puncture, onset to recanalization, door to recanalization time, mRS 0-2 at discharge, and consecutive 90-day mRS score. The odds ratio (OR) and weighted mean difference (WMD) with 95% confidence interval (CI) of the outcomes were calculated using random-effect models. Heterogenicity and publication bias were analyzed. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were conducted as appropriate. Nineteen studies published between 2014 and 2021 with a total of 14185 patients were eligible for quantitative synthesis. Patients in the off-hour group were significantly younger than those in the on-hour group and with comparable stroke severity and intravenous thrombolysis rate. The off-hour group had longer onset to door (WMD [95%CI], 12.83 [1.84-23.82] min), door to puncture (WMD [95%CI], 11.45 [5.93-16.97] min), imaging to puncture (WMD [95%CI], 10.39 [4.61-16.17] min), onset to puncture (WMD [95%CI], 25.30 [13.11-37.50] min), onset to recanalization (WMD [95%CI], 25.16 [10.28-40.04] min), and door to recanalization (WMD [95%CI], 18.02 [10.01-26.03] min) time. Significantly lower successful recanalization rate (OR [95%CI], 0.85 [0.76-0.95]; P=0.004; I2=0%) was detected in the off-hour group. No significant difference was noted regarding SICH and prognosis. But a trend towards lower OR of good prognosis was witnessed in the off-hour group (OR [95%CI], 0.92 [0.84-1.01]; P=0.084; I2=0%). Conclusions Patients who presented/were treated during off-hour were associated with excessive delays before the initiation of EVT, lower successful reperfusion rate, and a trend towards worse prognosis when compared with working hours. Optimizing the workflows of EVT during off-hour is needed.

Download Full-text

Abstract 1122‐000223: Direct to Angiography Suite versus Conventional Imaging in Suspected Large Vessel Occlusion Strokes: A Meta‐Analysis

Stroke: Vascular and Interventional Neurology ◽

10.1161/svin.01.suppl_1.000223 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 1 (S1) ◽

Author(s):

Mahmoud H Mohammaden ◽

Mohamed Elfil ◽

Mohamed Fahmy Doheim ◽

Agostinho Camara Pinheiro ◽

Alhamza R Al‐Bayati ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Randomized Clinical Trials ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Functional Independence ◽

Large Vessel ◽

Cochrane Library ◽

Conventional Imaging ◽

Large Vessel Occlusion ◽

Vessel Occlusion ◽

Angiography Suite ◽

Significant Difference

Introduction : Direct transfer to angiography suite (DTAS) for patients with suspected large vessel occlusion strokes potentially requiring mechanical thrombectomy has been shown to shorten treatment times and improve outcomes compared to conventional imaging (CI) selection. This meta‐analysis compares both approaches to build more concrete evidence. Methods : The potentially relevant studies that were published in four electronic databases/search engines (PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Scopus) till August 2021 were reviewed. Eligible studies were included if they enrolled >10 patients in both groups, were published in English and reported baseline and procedural characteristics and 90‐day outcomes. Relevant data were then extracted and analyzed. Results : Among 4514 searched studies, six qualified for the analysis. Time from door to puncture (MD = ‐26.76minutes, 95 % CI [‐39.48, ‐14.03], P< 0.0001) as well as door to reperfusion (MD = ‐27.21 minutes,95% CI [‐47.42, ‐7.01], P = 0.008) were significantly shorter and the rates of functional independence(mRS0‐2: RR = 1.28, 95% CI [1.03, 1.60], P = 0.03) at 90‐days were significantly higher in the DTAS versus the CI approach. There was no statistically significant difference between DTAS and CI groups in terms of successful reperfusion (modified Thrombolysis In Cerebral Infraction [mTICI] score2B‐3: RR = 0.99, 95% CI [0.93, 1.06], P = 0.86), near complete/ full reperfusion (mTICI 2C‐3: RR = 0.84,95% CI [0.68, 1.04], P = 0.11), or fair outcomes at 90‐days (mRS 0–3: RR = 1.05, 95% CI [0.67, 1.64],P = 0.84). Moreover, there was no difference between groups regarding symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (RR = 0.81, 95% CI [0.55, 1.17], P = 0.26) or 90 day‐mortality (RR = 0.85, 95% CI [0.59, 1.24],P = 0.41). Conclusions : Our meta‐analysis showed that DTAS significantly improves time metrics and functional outcome with comparable safety to the CI approach. Multicenter randomized clinical trials are ongoing to confirm these results.

Download Full-text

Abstract TP19: Clinical Outcomes In Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke Due To Large Vessel Occlusion In The Modern Era: 2010-2011 Experience With 423 Patients.

Stroke ◽

10.1161/str.44.suppl_1.atp19 ◽

2013 ◽

Vol 44 (suppl_1) ◽

Author(s):

Maxim Mokin ◽

Tareq Kass-Hout ◽

Omar Kass-Hout ◽

Erol Veznedaroglu ◽

Fadi Nahab ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Ischemic Stroke ◽

Endovascular Treatment ◽

Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽

Clinical Outcomes ◽

Medical Management ◽

Mortality Rates ◽

Artery Occlusion ◽

Large Vessel ◽

Large Vessel Occlusion ◽

Vessel Occlusion

Background and Purpose: Acute ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion is associated with a poor prognosis. With no consensus about the best treatment option, various treatment modalities including conservative management, intravenous tissue plasminogen activator, and endovascular approach are currently being used. Methods: Retrospective data including demographic information, baseline NIHSS score, site of occlusion (based on CTA, MRA or angiogram), type of treatment and clinical outcomes were collected from 4 centers in the United States during the period of 2010-2011. Results: A total of 423 were included in final analysis: 175 patients received conservative medical management, 54 patients received intravenous (IV) thrombolysis alone, and 194 patients had endovascular treatment (with or without prior IV tPA). Younger patients were more likely to receive endovascular treatment (p<0.001). There was no statistically significant difference among the sex and co-morbid conditions among the three groups. Proximal middle cerebral artery was the most commonly involved vessel. Strokes due to basilar artery occlusion or internal carotid artery occlusion were associated with worst outcomes in all three groups. Conservative medical management had the lowest rates of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage but also the highest mortality rates at 3 months. Patients who received endovascular treatment within the first 3 hrs had better outcome and lower mortality rates as compared to patients with intervention during 3-8 hours or beyond 8 hrs. Conclusions: Our study represents real world experience on the management and outcomes of acute ischemic strokes due to large vessel occlusion. Our results help understand natural history of strokes with large vessel occlusion, as well as modern trends in managing these patients with intravenous and intraarterial treatment approaches.

Download Full-text

Workflow Intervals of Endovascular Acute Stroke Therapy During On- Versus Off-Hours

Stroke ◽

10.1161/strokeaha.119.025381 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 50 (10) ◽

pp. 2842-2850 ◽

Cited By ~ 3

Author(s):

Wouter H. Hinsenveld ◽

Inger R. de Ridder ◽

Robert J. van Oostenbrugge ◽

Jan A. Vos ◽

Adrien E. Groot ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Ischemic Stroke ◽

Endovascular Treatment ◽

Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽

Functional Outcome ◽

Large Vessel ◽

Complication Rates ◽

Large Vessel Occlusion ◽

Anterior Circulation ◽

Vessel Occlusion ◽

Significant Difference

Background and Purpose— Endovascular treatment (EVT) of patients with acute ischemic stroke because of large vessel occlusion involves complicated logistics, which may cause a delay in treatment initiation during off-hours. This might lead to a worse functional outcome. We compared workflow intervals between endovascular treatment–treated patients presenting during off- and on-hours. Methods— We retrospectively analyzed data from the MR CLEAN Registry, a prospective, multicenter, observational study in the Netherlands and included patients with an anterior circulation large vessel occlusion who presented between March 2014 and June 2016. Off-hours were defined as presentation on Monday to Friday between 17:00 and 08:00 hours, weekends (Friday 17:00 to Monday 8:00) and national holidays. Primary end point was first door to groin time. Secondary end points were functional outcome at 90 days (modified Rankin Scale) and workflow time intervals. We stratified for transfer status, adjusted for prognostic factors, and used linear and ordinal regression models. Results— We included 1488 patients of which 936 (62.9%) presented during off-hours. Median first door to groin time was 140 minutes (95% CI, 110–182) during off-hours and 121 minutes (95% CI, 85–157) during on-hours. Adjusted first door to groin time was 14.6 minutes (95% CI, 9.3–20.0) longer during off-hours. Door to needle times for intravenous therapy were slightly longer (3.5 minutes, 95% CI, 0.7–6.3) during off-hours. Groin puncture to reperfusion times did not differ between groups. For transferred patients, the delay within the intervention center was 5.0 minutes (95% CI, 0.5–9.6) longer. There was no significant difference in functional outcome between patients presenting during off- and on-hours (adjusted odds ratio, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.74–1.14). Reperfusion rates and complication rates were similar. Conclusions— Presentation during off-hours is associated with a slight delay in start of endovascular treatment in patients with acute ischemic stroke. This treatment delay did not translate into worse functional outcome or increased complication rates.

Download Full-text

Off-hour effect is not significant in endovascular treatment for anterior circulation large vessel occlusion in a multicentre registry

Stroke and Vascular Neurology ◽

10.1136/svn-2021-000949 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. svn-2021-000949

Author(s):

Mingming Zha ◽

Qingwen Yang ◽

Shuo Liu ◽

Kangmo Huang ◽

Xiaohao Zhang ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Endovascular Treatment ◽

Clinical Outcomes ◽

Primary Outcome ◽

Binary Logistic Regression ◽

Favourable Outcome ◽

Large Vessel ◽

Large Vessel Occlusion ◽

Anterior Circulation ◽

Vessel Occlusion ◽

Group Time

Background and purposeWhether the off-hour effect has an impact on workflow and outcomes of endovascular treatment (EVT) for anterior circulation large vessel occlusion (AC-LVO) remains uncertain. This study aimed to compare the characteristics and outcomes of patients who presented or were treated during off-hour versus on-hour in a multi-center registry.MethodsAC-LVO patients from 21 centres were categorised into the off-hour group and the on-hour group. Off-hour (weekends, holidays, and 18:00–7:59 on weekdays) and on-hour (8:00–17:59 on weekdays except for holidays) were defined according to arrival and groin-puncture time points, respectively. Subgroup comparisons between patients both arrived and treated during off-hour (true off-hour) and on-hour (true on-hour) were performed. The primary outcome was the 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score. Secondary outcomes included favourable outcome (mRS 0–2 at 90 days), EVT-related time metrics, and other clinical outcomes. Ordinary and binary logistic regression and linear regression were taken to adjust for confounding factors.ResultsOf all 698 patients enrolled, 435 (62.3%) and 456 (65.3%) patients were categorised into the off-hour arrival and off-hour puncture group, respectively. Shorter onset to door time (adjusted ß coefficient: −21.56; 95% CI −39.96 to −3.16; p=0.022) was noted in the off-hour arrival group. Ordinal and dichotomous mRS scores at 90 days were comparable between the off-hour group and the on-hour group regardless of off-hour definitions. Other time metrics and outcomes were comparable between the two groups. Of 595 patients both presented and were treated during off-hour or on-hour, 394 patients were categorised into the true off-hour group and 201 into the true on-hour group. Time metrics and clinical outcomes were similar between the true off-hour and the true on-hour group.ConclusionsThe off-hour effect was not significant regarding clinical outcomes and in-hospital workflow in AC-LVO patients receiving EVT in this Chinese multicentre registry.

Download Full-text

Workflow Intervals andOutcomesof Endovascular Treatment for Acute Large-Vessel Occlusion During On- Versus Off-Hours in China The ANGEL-ACT Registry

10.1101/2021.06.10.21258678 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Yunlong Ding ◽

Feng Gao ◽

Yong Ji ◽

Tingting Zhai ◽

Xu Tong ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Ischemic Stroke ◽

Endovascular Treatment ◽

Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽

Clinical Outcomes ◽

The Elderly ◽

Large Vessel ◽

Large Vessel Occlusion ◽

Vessel Occlusion ◽

Logistic Regression Models ◽

The Hours

Abstract Background Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) leads to a substantial burden of disease among the elderly. There may be a delay in or a poor outcome of endovascular treatment (EVT) among AIS patients with large-vessel occlusion (LVO) during off-hours. By using a prospective, nationwide registry, we compared the workflow intervals and radiological/clinical outcomes between patients with acute LVO treated with EVT presenting during off- and on-hours. Methods We analyzed prospectively collected Endovascular Treatment Key Technique and Emergency Work Flow Improvement of Acute Ischemic Stroke (ANGEL-ACT) data. Patients presenting during off-hours were defined as those presenting to the emergency department from Monday to Friday between the hours of 17:30 and 08:00, on weekends (from 17:30 on Friday to 08:00 on Monday), and on national holidays. We used logistic regression models with adjustment for potential confounders to determine independent associations between the time of presentation and outcomes. Results Among 1788 patients, 1079 (60.3%) presented during off-hours. The median onset-to-door time and onset-to-reperfusion time were significantly longer during off-hours than on-hours (165 vs 125 minutes, P=0.002 and 410 vs 392 minutes, P=0.027). However, there were no significant differences between patients presenting during off- and on-hours in any radiological/clinical outcomes (mRS score: 3 vs 3 points, P=0.204; mortality: 15.9% vs 14.3%, P=0.172; successful reperfusion: 88.5% vs 87.2%, P=0.579; sICH: 7.2% vs 8.4%, P=0.492). Conclusions Off-hours presentation in the nationwide real-world registry was associated with a delay in the visit and reperfusion time of EVT in patients with AIS. However, this delay did not lead to worse radiological/clinical outcomes.

Download Full-text

Drip-and-Ship Model for Thrombectomy in Stroke Patients with Large-Vessel Occlusion

European Neurology ◽

10.1159/000513853 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. 1-7

Author(s):

Zhichao Huang ◽

Guojie Zhai ◽

Shoujiang You ◽

Zhijie Ou ◽

Xueyu Mao ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Endovascular Treatment ◽

Functional Outcome ◽

Large Scale ◽

Large Vessel ◽

Large Vessel Occlusion ◽

Anterior Circulation ◽

Vessel Occlusion ◽

Ship Model ◽

Front Door ◽

Significant Difference

Background: Previous studies have demonstrated the efficacy of the “drip-and-ship” model in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients treated with intravenous (IV) thrombolysis. We investigated and report the outcomes of the safety and efficacy of the “drip-and-ship” model in AIS patients with acute large-vessel occlusion (LVO) in the anterior circulation who underwent endovascular treatment. Methods: A total of 92 AIS patients with LVO who underwent endovascular treatment enrolled from April 2017 to July 2018 at a single academic comprehensive stroke center (CSC) were included. Patients were divided into 2 groups: a front-door group (directly admitted to the CSC) and a drip-and-ship group (transferred to the CSC from other hospital). Logistic regression model was used to evaluate the functional outcome, mortality, and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) at 90 days. Results: After adjusting for age, gender, occlusion site, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score, and other potential covariates, we did not see difference in modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score between the 2 groups at 90 days. The rate of excellent functional outcome (defined as mRS 0–1) in the drip-and-ship group is lower than the front-door group (p = 0.017); however, functional outcomes (defined as mRS 0–2) have no difference (p = 0.117). There was no significant difference in sICH (p = 0.909) and mortality (p = 0.319) between the 2 groups. Conclusions: The “drip-and-ship” model has the potential to be a feasible model for patients with LVO in the anterior circulation to undergo endovascular treatment. Further large-scale prospective studies are warranted to confirm these findings.

Download Full-text

Abstract 1122‐000222: Repeated Mechanical Thrombectomy for Recurrent Large Vessel Occlusion: A Meta‐Analysis of Individual Participant Data

Stroke: Vascular and Interventional Neurology ◽

10.1161/svin.01.suppl_1.000222 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 1 (S1) ◽

Author(s):

Mohamed Elfil ◽

Mohammad Aladawi ◽

Mohamed Eldokmak ◽

Ahmed Bayoumi ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Mechanical Thrombectomy ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Large Vessel ◽

Individual Participant Data ◽

Large Vessel Occlusion ◽

Vessel Occlusion ◽

Minimal Filling ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Individual Participant ◽

The Mean

Introduction : Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) has become the standard treatment of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) caused by large vessel occlusion (LVO), with different techniques used to achieve revascularization of the occluded vessel. However, early re‐occlusion of the target vessels could still take place in a considerable proportion of patients who already underwent MT for LVO. Therefore, we conducted this systematic review and individual participant data (IPD) meta‐analysis to provide more comprehensive evidence regarding the efficacy of repeat thrombectomy for recurrent LVO in early after successful first‐time MT. Methods : A computerized search on MEDLINE via PubMed, SCOPUS, Web of Science, EMBASE, and Cochrane library using the relevant keywords was performed. The retrieved references were screened, and the relevant data were extracted. STATA and SPSS were used to perform this IPD meta‐analysis. Results : Twenty studies were included, of which ten studies were observational studies (n = 21,251 patients) and 10 cases reports (n = 10 patients). Out of the included patients, 266 patients (62.78% females) were identified with recurrent LVO. The overall prevalence of recurrent LVO was 1.6%, 95% CI (1.0% to 2.8%), p<0.001. The mean age of the included patients was 65.67±16.23 years. Cardiac embolism was the most common cause of stroke in both times (52%). The median number of days between the first and second LVO was 15 days (IQR: 4–191). Regarding the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), the first and second MT reduced it significantly (MD = ‐8.91, 95% CI: ‐10.02 to ‐7.82) and (MD = ‐5.97, 95% CI: ‐7.53 to ‐4.43), respectively, with a significant difference between both procedures (p = 0.001). The mean ASPECT after the first MT was 8.65±1.45, and after the second MT was 8.01±1.88. A significant weak correlation was observed between the ASPECT of first MT and NIHSS before it (r = ‐0.270, p = 0.001). Based on the thrombolysis in cerebral infarction (TICI) grading system, the first MT resulted in 57.3% complete perfusion, 42.1% partially filling, and 0.7% no/minimal filling, while the second MT resulted in 48% complete perfusion, 30% partially filling, and 6.67% no/minimal filling, with a significant difference between both MTs (p = 0.042). Regarding the modified Rankin scale (mRS) at 90 days after the first MT, “0” was the most frequent outcome (26.9%), followed by “2” (13.0%), “1” (12.4%), and “4” (7.3%). On the other hand, the 90‐day mRS after the second MT was categorized as the following: “6” in 13.5%, “3” in 13.5%, “2” in 11.9%, “1” in 11.9%, and “4” in 9.3%. Conclusions : In properly selected patients with recurrent LVO, repeated MT appears to be feasible and safe. A prior MT procedure should not discourage aggressive treatment as these patients may achieve similar rates of good clinical outcomes as those who undergo single MT.

Download Full-text

Abstract 1122‐000182: Histological Composition of Large Vessel Occlusion Stroke‐Causing Thrombi to Identify Etiologies: Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis

Stroke: Vascular and Interventional Neurology ◽

10.1161/svin.01.suppl_1.000182 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 1 (S1) ◽

Author(s):

Paul Yeung‐Lai‐Wah ◽

Kunakorn Atchaneeyasakul ◽

Kyle Sheu ◽

Neal Rao ◽

David Liebeskind ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Blood Cells ◽

Mechanical Thrombectomy ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Cryptogenic Stroke ◽

Large Vessel ◽

Large Artery ◽

Large Vessel Occlusion ◽

Vessel Occlusion ◽

Histological Difference ◽

Significant Difference

Introduction : More than a third of large vessel occlusion ischemic strokes do not have clear etiology. Mechanical thrombectomy provides a method to retrieve stroke‐causing thrombi and potentially identifying the etiology. A systematic meta‐analysis is performed to determine if there is a histological difference in red blood cell (RBC) composition of thrombi after the etiology of the stroke is known. Methods : We performed a systematic search through PUBMED and EMBASE. Studies meeting inclusion criteria were identified in which the large vessel occlusion stroke‐causing thrombi histology and etiology of the stroke were determined as either large artery atherosclerotic (LAA), cardioembolic (CE) or cryptogenic. Studies that had the data available or extractable data were selected. Random‐effect models were used to compare the histological difference between each etiology. Results : From inception to August 2021, 4 studies (n = 1022) were used to compare CE vs LAA, 5 studies (n = 1247) were used to compare CE vs cryptogenic and 4 studies (n = 654) were used to compare LAA vs cryptogenic. There was no significant difference in the red blood cells vs white blood cells/fibrin/platelets component between the stroke origins of CE vs LAA (mean difference (MD) ‐1.87; 95% confidence internal [CI]: ‐16.51, 12.78), CE vs cryptogenic (MD 1.18; 95% CI: ‐1.49, 3.86) and LAA vs cryptogenic (MD 7.20; 95% CI: ‐3.93, 18.34). Conclusions : There was no significant gross histological difference between CE, LAA and cryptogenic stroke etiologies and of the large vessel occlusion stroke‐causing thrombi retrieved by mechanical thrombectomy. Further studies into biochemical or genetic markers may be needed to identify stroke etiology.

Download Full-text

Mechanical thrombectomy versus intravenous thrombolysis for distal large-vessel occlusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies

Neurosurgical FOCUS ◽

10.3171/2021.4.focus21139 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 51 (1) ◽

pp. E5

Author(s):

Muhammad Waqas ◽

Cathleen C. Kuo ◽

Rimal H. Dossani ◽

Andre Monteiro ◽

Ammad A. Baig ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Systematic Review ◽

Cerebral Artery ◽

Medical Management ◽

Mechanical Thrombectomy ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Intravenous Thrombolysis ◽

Large Vessel ◽

Cochrane Library ◽

Large Vessel Occlusion ◽

Vessel Occlusion

OBJECTIVE While several studies have compared the feasibility and safety of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for distal large-vessel occlusion (LVO) strokes in patients, few studies have compared MT with intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) alone. The purpose of this systematic review was to compare the effectiveness and safety between MT and standard medical management with IVT alone for patients with distal LVOs. METHODS PubMed, Google Scholar, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, Ovid Medline, and Cochrane Library were searched in order to identify studies that directly compared MT with IVT for distal LVOs (anterior cerebral artery A2, middle cerebral artery M3–4, and posterior cerebral artery P2–4). Primary outcomes of interest included a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0 to 2 at 90 days posttreatment, occurrence of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH), and all-cause mortality at 90 days posttreatment. RESULTS Four studies representing a total of 381 patients were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled results indicated that the proportion of patients with an mRS score of 0 to 2 at 90 days (OR 1.16, 95% CI 0.23–5.93; p = 0.861), the occurrence of sICH (OR 2.45, 95% CI 0.75–8.03; p = 0.140), and the mortality rate at 90 days (OR 1.73, 95% CI 0.66–4.55; p = 0.263) did not differ between patients who underwent MT and those who received IVT alone. CONCLUSIONS The meta-analysis did not demonstrate a significant difference between MT and standard medical management with regard to favorable outcome, occurrence of sICH, or 90-day mortality. Prospective clinical trials are needed to further compare the efficacy of MT with IVT alone for distal vessel occlusion.

Download Full-text

Thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke: Experience from a tertiary care centre in India

Journal of Neurosciences in Rural Practice ◽

10.4103/0976-3147.127867 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 5 (01) ◽

pp. 25-30 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Vikram Huded ◽

Romnesh De Souza ◽

Rajesh Karalumangala Nagarajaiah ◽

Syed Moeed Zafer ◽

Rithesh Nair ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Ischemic Stroke ◽

Endovascular Treatment ◽

Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽

Endovascular Therapy ◽

Large Vessel ◽

Large Vessel Occlusion ◽

Vessel Occlusion ◽

Vessel Disease ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Large Vessel Disease

ABSTRACTThe management of acute ischemic stroke has undergone a sea of change with the introduction of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT). Current guidelines state that the window period for IVT using rTPA is 4.5 hours. The MERCI, Multi Merci, and Penumbra trials in which patients with acute ischemic stroke were treated using endovascular treatment demonstrated better recanalisation in patients having a large vessel occlusion. However, recently published data from the three large trials IMS 3, Synthesis Expansion, and MR rescue, which compared endovascular treatment with intravenous therapy, failed to demonstrate superiority of endovascular treatment over IVT. In these trials, stent retrievers were used in very few patients. We present our results from a tertiary care center in India where patients are treated using intravenous as well as endovascular modalities. Among the 53 patients with acute ischemic stroke treated between 2010 and 2012, 23 were treated with IVT and 30 with endovascular methods. Stent retriever was used in majority of the endovascular cases. Aims: To compare the outcomes of acute ischemic stroke patients treated with IVT versus those who were managed using endovascular therapy. To evaluate outcomes of patients with acute ischemic stroke with a large vessel occlusion in whom endovascular modalities were used and to compare them with those of patients who were treated with IVT in presence of a large vessel occlusion. Settings and Design: Data of patients who underwent thrombolysis at our centre was collected over a 3-year period, that is, from 2010 to 2012. Endovascular treatment was done by an interventional neurologist. Materials and Methods: Data of patients with acute ischemic stroke who underwent IVT or endovascular treatment at our centre between 2010 and 2012 was analyzed. Parameters included age, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) on admission, door to needle time, stroke subtype, modality of treatment, outcome based on modified Rankin Scale (mRS) Score at 90 days follow up and mortality rates at 90 days. Statistical Analysis: Tabulated results were analysed using INSTAT Graphpad analyser. Data were analysed using paired and unpaired t-test, Chi-square test, and Fishers test as applicable. P value was considered significant when it was <0.05. Results: Upon comparison of the outcomes of patients with acute ischemic stroke and large vessel disease treated with endovascular therapy with those treated with IVT, it was found that the former group had better outcomes. We also found that in spite of there being a significant difference in the NIHSS on admission and a significant difference in the door to needle time, the outcomes of patients treated using intravenous or endovascular therapy were similar. There was no statistically significant difference in mortality rates between intravenous and endovascular groups. Conclusions: IVT is currently the standard of care in the management of acute ischemic stroke. Endovascular treatment during the window period is reserved for those patients with contraindication to IVT. In this study, we found that patients with documented large vessel disease with no evidence of cross flow through Willisian collaterals benefit from endovascular treatment. We recommend that all patients of acute ischemic stroke, be subjected to a baseline angiogram either computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to document vessel status. This will help in identifying patients who may benefit from early endovascular treatment, if they fail to improve with IVT. Further, large trials using stent retrievers are needed, to prove that endovascular treatment is superior to IVT, in presence of documented large vessel disease.

Download Full-text