Effectiveness of lubratex and vitamin A on ocular surface disorders in ICU patients: A randomized clinical trial

Background High prevalence of ocular surface disorders includes eye dryness and corneal ulcer among intensive care unit patients remains an issue. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of Lubratex ointment and vitamin A eye ointment in preventing ocular surface disorders in intensive care unit patients. Methods A single-center randomized clinical trial was conducted in critically ill patients of vitamin A eye ointment and Lubratex ointment in preventing ocular surface disorders. Forty-one eligible patients were randomly assigned to administered vitamin A eye ointment in one eye and Lubratex ointment in the other eye. After five days, using fluorescein and Schirmer's tests, an ophthalmologist examined patients and specified those with ocular surface disorders. Results The results showed a significant decrease in the incidence of dry eye ( p ≤ 0.001) and corneal ulcer ( p = 0.002) with the use of Lubratex ointment. Conclusions Although Lubratex ointment was more effective than vitamin A ointment in preventing ocular surface disorders, further research is needed to confirm the findings of the present study.

Download Full-text

Comparing Vitamin A and Moist Chamber in Preventing Ocular Surface Disorders

Clinical Nursing Research ◽

10.1177/1054773817695618 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 27 (6) ◽

pp. 714-729 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Hassan Babamohamadi ◽

Monir Nobahar ◽

Jalaladin Razi ◽

Raheb Ghorbani

Keyword(s):

Clinical Trial ◽

Intensive Care Unit ◽

Intensive Care ◽

Vitamin A ◽

Ocular Surface ◽

Slight Reduction ◽

Moist Chamber ◽

Icu Patients ◽

Schirmer’S Test

The present study was conducted to determine the effectiveness of vitamin A eye ointment (VAEO) and moist chamber (MC) in preventing ocular surface disorders (OSD) in intensive care unit (ICU) patients. A total of 38 eligible patients were selected for participation in the present clinical trial. All the patients were randomly administered VAEO in one eye every 6 hr for 5 days and had a polyethylene cover (PC) placed on their other eye to create an MC that was replaced every 12 hr as well. The results of Schirmer’s test also increased by 2.06 mm in the VAEO group ( p < .001), while they showed a slight reduction by 0.15 mm in the MC group ( p = .669). VAEO was more effective in preventing OSD in ICU patients than MC and is, therefore, recommended to be used as a method of preventing OSD.

Download Full-text

Comparing the Effect of Neostigmine and Metoclopramide on Gastric Residual Volume of Mechanically Ventilated Patients in Intensive Care Unit: A Double-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial

BioMed Research International ◽

10.1155/2021/5550653 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 2021 ◽

pp. 1-7

Author(s):

Alireza Rahat-Dahmardeh ◽

Sara Saneie-Moghadam ◽

Masoum Khosh-Fetrat

Keyword(s):

Clinical Trial ◽

Intensive Care Unit ◽

Intensive Care ◽

Randomized Clinical Trial ◽

Normal Saline ◽

Residual Volume ◽

Gastric Residual Volume ◽

Double Blind ◽

Icu Patients ◽

Mechanically Ventilated

Introduction. The gastric residual volume (GRV) monitoring in patients with mechanical ventilation (MV) is a common and important challenge. The purpose of this study was to compare the effect of neostigmine and metoclopramide on GRV among MV patients in the intensive care unit (ICU). Methods. In a double-blind randomized clinical trial, a total of 200 mechanically ventilated ICU patients with GRV > 120 ml (6 hours after the last gavage) were randomly assigned into two groups (A and B) with 100 patients in each group. Patients in groups A and B received intravenous infusion of neostigmine at a dose of 2.5 mg/100 ml normal saline and metoclopramide at a dose of 10 mg/100 ml normal saline, within 30 minutes, respectively. GRV was evaluated 5 times for each patient, once before the intervention and 4 times (at 3, 6, 9, and 12 hours) after the intervention. In addition, demographic characteristics including age and gender, as well as severity illness based on the sequential organ failure assessment score (SOFA), were initially recorded for all patients. Results. After adjusting of demographic and clinical characteristics (age, gender, and SOFA score), the generalized estimating equation (GEE) model revealed that neostigmine treatment increased odds of GRV improvement compared to the metoclopramide group ( OR = 2.45 , 95% CI: 1.60-3.76, P < 0.001 ). However, there is a statistically significant time trend (within-subject differences or time effect) regardless of treatment groups ( P < 0.001 ). Conclusion. According to the results, although neostigmine treatment significantly improved GRV in more patients in less time, within 12 hours of treatment, all patients in both groups had complete recovery. Considering that there was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of side effects, it seems that both drugs are effective in improving the GRV of ICU patients.

Download Full-text