scholarly journals Is a small-caliber or large-caliber endoscope more suitable for colonic self-expandable metallic stent placement? A randomized controlled study

2022 ◽  
Vol 15 ◽  
pp. 175628482110653
Author(s):  
Yosuke Minoda ◽  
Haruei Ogino ◽  
Yorinobu Sumida ◽  
Takashi Osoegawa ◽  
Soichi Itaba ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Success Rate ◽  
Colonic Obstruction ◽  
Clinical Success Rate ◽  
Insertion Time ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Metallic Stent ◽  
Procedure Time ◽  
Sems Placement ◽  
Expandable Metallic Stent

Objectives: The colonic self-expandable metallic stent (C-SEMS) with a 9-French (Fr) delivery system allows for a small-caliber endoscope (SCE) to be used to treat malignant colonic obstruction. Despite the lack of evidence, the SCE has become popular because it is considered easier to insert than the large-caliber endoscope (LCE). We aimed to determine whether the SCE is more suitable than the LCE for C-SEMS placement. Methods: Between July 2018 and November 2019, 50 consecutive patients who were scheduled to undergo C-SEMS for colon obstruction were recruited in this study. Patients were randomized to the SCE or LCE group. The SCE and LCE were used with 9-Fr and 10-Fr delivery systems, respectively. The primary outcome was the total procedure time. Secondary outcomes were the technical success rate, complication rate, clinical success rate, insertion time, guidewire-passage time, stent-deployment time, and colonic obstruction-scoring-system score. Results: Forty-five patients (SCE group, n = 22; LCE group, n = 23) were analyzed. The procedure time in the LCE group (median, 20.5 min) was significantly ( p = 0.024) shorter than that in the SCE group (median, 25.1 min). The insertion time in the LCE group (median, 2.0 min) was significantly ( p = 0.0049) shorter than that in the SCE group (median, 6.0 min). A sub-analysis of the procedure difficulties showed that the insertion time in the LCE group (median, 5.0 min) was significantly shorter than that in the SCE group (median, 8.5 min). Conclusion: Both LCE and SCE can be used for C-SEMS; however, LCE is more suitable than SCE as it achieved a faster and equally efficacious C-SEMS placement as that of SCE. Clinical trial registration number: University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN 32748)

scholarly journals Endoscopic Self-Expandable Metallic Stent Insertion without Fluoroscopic Guidance Is Feasible and Safe for Acute Colonic Obstruction Caused by Colorectal Cancer

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
Yadong Feng ◽  
Qian Yu ◽  
Ming Li ◽  
Wei Xu ◽  
Ye Zhu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Success Rate ◽  
Clinical Success ◽  
Colonic Obstruction ◽  
Clinical Success Rate ◽  
Metallic Stent ◽  
Fluoroscopic Guidance ◽  
Procedure Time ◽  
Technical Success ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Expandable Metallic Stent

Aims. Endoscopic self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS) insertion for acute colonic obstruction caused by colorectal cancer (CRC) is always performed under fluoroscopic guidance. This study evaluated the feasibility and safety of an endoscopic stenting procedure without fluoroscopic guidance. Methods. A total of 36 patients with an acute colonic obstruction caused by CRC underwent endoscopic SEMS insertion using a colonoscope without fluoroscopic guidance, followed by analyses of the technical and clinical success and short-term complications. Results. Total technical success rate and clinical success rate were 91.7% and 86.1%, respectively. The mean procedure time was 21.2±10.3 minutes. There was no stent dislodgement. One case of hematochezia and two cases of tenesmus occurred in patients with left-sided complete obstructions. No other short-term complications occurred. Procedure time, technical success, and clinical success rate were 16.3±9.4 minutes, 93.1%, and 89.6% for left-sided obstructions, respectively, and were 26.8±10.7 minutes, 85.7%, and 71.4% for right-sided obstructions, respectively. For complete obstructions, procedure time, technical success, and clinical success rate were 22.5±8.9 minutes, 90%, and 83.3%, respectively. In the incomplete cases, procedure time, technical success, and clinical success were 13.5±6.7 minutes, 100%, and 100%, respectively. Technical success, clinical success, and short-term complications were not differed between lesion locations and degrees. Conclusions. This simple technique is feasible and safe for palliation of acute colonic obstruction caused by CRC.

scholarly journals The Effectiveness of Self-Expandable Metallic Stent Insertion in Treating Right-Sided Colonic Obstruction: A Comparison between SEMS and Decompression Tube Placement and an Investigation of the Safety and Difficulties of SEMS Insertion in Right Colons

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rintaro Moroi ◽  
Katsuya Endo ◽  
Ryo Ichikawa ◽  
Hiroshi Nagai ◽  
Hirohiko Shinkai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Success ◽  
Colonic Obstruction ◽  
Clinical Success Rate ◽  
Technical Difficulty ◽  
Tube Placement ◽  
Stent Insertion ◽  
Metallic Stent ◽  
Expandable Metallic Stent ◽  
Malignant Colonic Obstruction ◽  
Decompression Tube

Objectives.Self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS) is widely used to treat malignant colonic obstruction. However, most reports about SEMS insertion have concentrated on the left colon. This study aimed to (1) investigate the effectiveness of SEMS insertion compared with conventional decompression tube for right-sided colonic obstruction and (2) compare the safety and technical success of SEMS insertion between left- and right-sided colonic obstructions.Methods.The data from thirty-seven patients who underwent SEMS or conventional decompression tube placement for malignant colonic obstruction in our hospital were analyzed retrospectively. Technical and clinical success, complications, and technical difficulties were analyzed. We compared the results between SEMS insertion and decompression tube placement in right colons and the outcomes of SEMS insertion between right- and left-sided colonic obstructions.Results.For right colons, the clinical success rate of SEMS insertion (100%) was significantly higher than that of decompression tube placement (55.9%). Concerning SEMS insertion, the technical difficulty and safety of SEMS insertion were similar between right- and left-sided colonic obstructions.Conclusion.SEMS insertion for right-sided colon is significantly more effective than conventional decompression tube placement, and this procedure was safer and less technically challenging than expected. SEMS insertion should be considered for treating right-sided malignant colonic obstruction.

AF.7 USE OF PURASTAT® FOR POST-SPHINCTEROTOMY BLEEDING REFRANTORY TO SELF-EXPANDABLE METALLIC STENT (SEMS) PLACEMENT: A CASE REPORT

2021 ◽  
Vol 53 ◽  
pp. S140-S141
Author(s):  
M. Sica ◽  
C. Abbatiello ◽  
M. Gagliardi ◽  
O. Labianca ◽  
G. Oliviero ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Case Report ◽  
Metallic Stent ◽  
Sems Placement ◽  
Expandable Metallic Stent

Comparison of alteplase and urokinase for pharmacomechanical thrombolysis of clotted hemodialysis access

2018 ◽  
Vol 20 (5) ◽  
pp. 501-506 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ru Yu Tan ◽  
Suh Chien Pang ◽  
Swee Ping Teh ◽  
Kian Guan Lee ◽  
Tze Tec Chong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Success Rate ◽  
Vascular Access ◽  
Clinical Success ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Clinical Success Rate ◽  
Skin Dose ◽  
Hemodialysis Access ◽  
Procedure Time ◽  
Technical Success Rate ◽  
Tertiary Teaching

Background: Percutaneous pharmacomechanical thrombolysis is increasingly used to salvage thrombosed hemodialysis access. We aim to evaluate the effectiveness of alteplase compared to urokinase in percutaneous pharmacomechanical thrombolysis clotted access. Methods: Records of patients who underwent pharmacomechanical thrombolysis at Interventional Nephrology Suite in a tertiary teaching hospital from 1 January 2016 to 31 December 2016 were reviewed. Technical and clinical success rates, thrombosis-free and cumulative survivals, procedure time, and radiation dose imparted to patients were compared for pharmacomechanical thrombolysis with urokinase versus alteplase. Results: A total of 122 incident patients underwent pharmacothrombolysis (n = 53 for urokinase, n = 69 for alteplase) during the study period. The mean dose of urokinase and alteplase used was 176,897 ± 73,418 units and 3.7 ± 0.8 mg, respectively. Pharmacomechnical thrombolysis using urokinase versus alteplase has similar technical success rate (98.1% vs 97.1%, p = 0.599), clinical success rate (88.7% vs 97.1%, p = 0.068), complication rate (9.4% vs 13.0%, p = 0.373), and primary patency rates at 3 months (57.1% vs 70.1%, p = 0.106). Thrombosis-free survivals of the vascular access were 113.2 (35.3, 196) days versus 122 (84, 239) days (p = 0.168). Cumulative survivals were 239 (116, 320) vs 213 (110.5, 316.5) days (p = 0.801). Procedure time, fluoroscopy time, skin dose, and dose were significantly lower for pharmacomechanical thrombolysis using alteplase compared to urokinase (p = 0.045, p < 0.0001, p = 0.006, p = 0.001, respectively). Stenting was found to be associated with successful dialysis following thrombolysis on univariate analysis (odds ratio: 9.167, 95% confidence interval: 1.391–19.846, p = 0.021), although this was no longer significant in multivariate analysis (p = 0.078). Conclusion: Alteplase is an effective and safe alternative to urokinase for pharmacomechanical thrombolysis of clotted vascular access.

Metallic Stent for Malignant Colorectal Obstruction

2018 ◽  
Vol 02 (01) ◽  
pp. 046-052
Author(s):  
Yoshitaka Inaba ◽  
Yozo Sato
Keyword(s):  
Stent Migration ◽  
Late Complications ◽  
Secondary Outcome ◽  
Successful Implementation ◽  
Metallic Stent ◽  
Bridge To Surgery ◽  
Success Rates ◽  
Sems Placement ◽  
Colorectal Obstruction ◽  
Expandable Metallic Stent

AbstractAcute colorectal obstruction has been often reported as a secondary outcome of left-colonic malignancy. It is considered as a common emergency condition. Self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS) placement is widely used as a palliative treatment for the management of malignant colorectal obstruction (MCRO). SEMS placement is also deliberated as a bridge to surgery. With advances in technology, several recent studies of SEMS placement for MCRO indicated high technical (94–98%) and clinical (91–93%) success rates. The complication rate associated with SEMS is quite acceptable. However, long-term outcomes are still unclear. The symptoms should be carefully monitored before application of SEMS, particularly in patients who are eligible for systemic chemotherapy and in patients with a long life expectancy because of late complications such as reobstruction, stent migration, and perforation. Appropriate patient selection and placement technique are keys for the successful implementation of SEMS.

scholarly journals Endoscopic biliary self-expandable metallic stent in malignant biliary obstruction with or without sphincterotomy: systematic review and meta-analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 07 (01) ◽  
pp. E26-E35 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benedetto Mangiavillano ◽  
Amedeo Montale ◽  
Leonardo Frazzoni ◽  
Mario Bianchetti ◽  
Amrita Sethi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Success Rate ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Stent Insertion ◽  
Metallic Stent ◽  
Success Rates ◽  
Technical Success ◽  
Technical Success Rate ◽  
Expandable Metallic Stent ◽  
Increased Risk

Abstract Background and aim To assess the rate of adverse events and the technical success rate of biliary stenting with or without EBS.  Methods A literature search up to February 2017 was performed. Studies assessing adverse events (AEs) and technical success rates of stenting with or without EBS were considered. Results Seven studies (870 patients; 12 treatment arms) were included. Early AEs, i. e. those occurring within 30 days, were significantly lower in no-EBS vs. EBS-group (11 % vs. 20.1 %; OR: 0.36, 95 %CI: 0.13 – 1.00). Rates of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) pancreatitis were not significantly different in the two groups (no-EBS vs. EBS: 6.1 % vs 5 %; OR: 1.33, 95 %CI: 0.68 – 2.59). The rate of bleeding was significantly lower in patients without EBS (no-EBS vs EBS: 0 % vs 5 %; OR: 0.12, 95 % CI: 0.03 – 0.45). Rates of cholangitis were significantly lower in patients without EBS (no-EBS vs. EBS: 3.3 % vs. 7.4 %; OR: 0.38, 95 %CI: 0.17 – 0.83). Both late AEs and mortality rates did not significantly differ between no-EBS and EBS patients (19.9 % vs. 18.9 %; OR: 0.93, 95 %CI: 0.56 – 1.53, and 2.5 % vs. 2.9 %; OR: 1.18, 95 %CI: 0.22 – 6.29, respectively). The technical success rate for stent insertion also did not differ (98 % vs. 97.6 %; OR: 1.05, 95 %CI: 0.42 – 2.63). Conclusion EBS seems to be associated, in the first 30 days after the procedure, with an increased risk of cholangitis and bleeding. No difference was observed in the rate of post-ERCP pancreatitis.

Clinical outcomes in patients undergoing multiple self-expandable metallic stent placement by stent in stent technique for malignant gastric outlet obstruction.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 88-88
Author(s):  
Jinwon MO ◽  
Jie-Hyun Kim ◽  
Seung Yong Shin ◽  
Da Hyun Jung ◽  
Jae Jun Park ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Outlet Obstruction ◽  
Stent Placement ◽  
Clinical Success ◽  
Outlet Obstruction ◽  
Metallic Stent ◽  
Sems Placement ◽  
Stent Patency ◽  
Malignant Gastric Outlet Obstruction ◽  
The Third ◽  
Expandable Metallic Stent

88 Background: Self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS) placement is widely used for relieving the obstructive symptoms of malignant gastric outlet obstruction (MGOO). The aims were to evaluate the efficacy and safety of multiple gastroduodenal stent placement by stent in stent technique and identify predictive factors about stent patency. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data from 170 patients with GOO receiving SEMS by stent in stent technique from July 2006 to July 2018. Among them, 90 patients had been treated with gastroduodenal SEMS placement for MGOO. Technical and clinical success rates were evaluated. And, clinical outcomes with predictors of stent patency were also analyzed. Results: Among the subjects, 34.4% were treated with secondary SEMS placement, and 9.7% were treated with third SEMS placement because of the previous stent dysfunction. The median stent patency time was 15.7 weeks (range 0-89) in the first SEMS, 10.4 weeks (range 0-44) in the second SEMS, and 11.3 weeks (range 1-29) in the third SEMS. The technical and clinical success rate were 100% and 97.8% in the first SEMS, 100% and 90.3% in the second SEMS, 100% and 100% in the third SEMS. In multivariable analysis, the first SEMS placement of covered type including Comvi stent was correlated with prolonged stent patency (OR 4.549, P = 0.001). And both chemotherapy after the first SEMS placement (OR 8.248, P = 0.006) and chemotherapy after the second SEMS placement (OR 7.467, P = 0.003) were correlated with prolonged stent patency. Serious complications such as gastrointestinal hemorrhage or perforation did not occur in any patient. Conclusions: Secondary and third gastroduodenal SEMS placement by stent in stent technique is a safe and effective treatment for the first stent dysfunction in MGOO. The stent placement of covered type and chemotherapy after stent placement is the predictor of stent patency. Keywords: Malignant gastric outlet obstruction, Self-expandable metallic stent, Stent in stent technique, Stent patency, Predictive factor

scholarly journals Bridge to Surgery Using a Self-Expandable Metallic Stent for Stages II–III Obstructive Colorectal Cancer

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katsuya Ohta ◽  
Masakazu Ikenaga ◽  
Masami Ueda ◽  
Kiyotsugu Iede ◽  
Yujiro Tsuda ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Venous Invasion ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Metallic Stent ◽  
Bridge To Surgery ◽  
Sems Placement ◽  
Obstructive Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Expandable Metallic Stent

Abstract Background: Bridge to surgery (BTS) using a self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS) for the treatment of obstructive colorectal cancer improves the patient’s quality of life. This study aimed to examine prognostic factors of obstructive colorectal cancer. Methods: We analyzed stage II-III resectable colon cancer cases (Cur A) retrospectively registered between January 2005 and 2017. We encountered Cur A cases after BTS with SEMS placement (BTS group). We compared surgical results and prognoses between the two groups. Results: A total of 50 patients underwent endoscopic SEMS placement, which technical success of 96% and morbidity rate of 18%. Overall, 117 patients were evaluated: 67 of them underwent emergency surgery (ES) and 50 underwent BTS. Primary anastomosis rates were 77.6% in ES and 95.7% in BTS (p < 0.001); postoperative complication, 46.3% in ES and 10.5% in BTS (p < 0.001); pathological findings of lymphatic invasion, 66.7% in ES and 100% in BTS (p < 0.001); venous invasion were 66.8% in ES and 92% in BTS (p = 0.04); and recurrence of 25.4% in ES and 39.1% in BTS. The 3-year overall survival was significantly different between two groups (ES, 86.8%:BTS, 58.8%), BTS is worse than ES (log-rank test; p < 0.001). Venous invasion independently predicted worsened recurrence-free and overall survival. Conclusions: The vascular invasiveness was correlated with tumor progression after SEMS placement, and the survival rate was lower in BTS. SEMS potentially worsens prognostic outcomes in stage II–III obstructive colorectal cancer.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document