scholarly journals The role of MRI/TRUS fusion biopsy in the diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 175628722091661
Author(s):  
Andrea Benelli ◽  
Chiara Vaccaro ◽  
Sonia Guzzo ◽  
Carlotta Nedbal ◽  
Virginia Varca ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Active Surveillance ◽  
Cancer Detection ◽  
Detection Rate ◽  
Transrectal Ultrasound ◽  
Fusion Biopsy ◽  
Clinically Significant ◽  
Biopsy Gleason Score ◽  
Prostate Cancers ◽  
Negative Biopsies

Background: The aim of this work is to evaluate the detection rate of magnetic resonance imaging/transrectal ultrasound (MRI/TRUS) fusion-guided biopsy for clinically significant prostate cancers (Cs PCas), with particular interest in biopsy-naive patients and patients in active surveillance. MRI-targeted biopsy improves cancer detection rate (DR) in patients with prior negative biopsies; the current literature focuses on biopsy naive patients. We also evaluated the pathologic concordance between biopsies and surgical specimens. Methods: MRI/TRUS fusion-guided biopsies were performed between February 2016 and February 2019. Patients with previous negative biopsies, biopsy-naive or in active surveillance (AS) were included. Cs PCas were defined through Epstein’s criteria. Results: A total of 416 men were enrolled. The overall DRs and Cs PCa DRs were 49% and 34.3%, respectively. Cs PCas were 17.2%, 44.9% and 73.4%, respectively for PI-RADS 3, 4 or 5. Among biopsy-naive patients, 34.8% were found to have a Cs PCa, while a 43.6% tumour upgrading was achieved in men with a low risk of PCa. In patients who underwent radical prostatectomy (RP), the concordance between biopsy Gleason score (GS) (bGS) and pathological GS (pGS) was 90.8%. Conclusion: Our study highlights the role of MRI/TRUS fusion prostate biopsy in the detection of PCa in patients with previous negative biopsies focusing on Cs PCa diagnosis. The MRI/TRUS fusion biopsy is also emerging as a diagnostic tool in biopsy-naïve patients and deserves a fundamental role in AS protocols. A greater concordance between bGS and pGS can be achieved with targeted biopsies.

scholarly journals MRI/US fusion prostate biopsy in men on active surveillance: Our experience

2021 ◽  
Vol 93 (1) ◽  
pp. 88-91
Author(s):  
Vito Lacetera ◽  
Angelo Antezza ◽  
Alessio Papaveri ◽  
Emanuele Cappa ◽  
Bernardino Cervelli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Active Surveillance ◽  
Cancer Detection ◽  
Detection Rate ◽  
Cancer Detection Rate ◽  
Fusion Biopsy ◽  
Prostate Imaging ◽  
Diagnostic Role ◽  
Clinically Significant ◽  
Target Biopsy

Aim: The upgrading or staging in men with prostate cancer (PCA) undergoing active surveillance (AS), defined as Gleason score (GS) ≥ 3+4 or more than 2 area with cancer, was investigated in our experience using the software-based fusion biopsy (FB). Methods: We selected from our database, composed of 620 biopsies, only men on AS according to criteria of John Hopkins Protocol (T1c, < 3 positive cores, GS = 3+3 = 6). Monitoring consisted of PSA measurement every 3 months, a clinical examination every 6 months, confirmatory FB within 6 months and then annual FB in all men. The suspicious MRI lesions were scored according to the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) classification version 2. FB were performed with a transrectal elastic free-hand fusion platform. The overall and clinically significant cancer detection rate was reported. Secondary, the diagnostic role of systematic biopsies was evaluated. Results: We selected 56 patients on AS with mean age 67.4 years, mean PSA 6.7 ng/ml and at least one follow-up MRI-US fusion biopsy (10 had 2 or 3 follow-up biopsies). Lesions detected by MRI were: PIRADS-2 in 5, PIRADS-3 in 28, PIRADS-4 in 18 pts and PIRADS-5 in 5 patients. In each MRI lesion, FB with 2.1 ± 1.1 cores were taken with a mean total cores of 13 ± 2.4 including the systematic cores. The overall cancer detection rate was 71% (40/56): 62% (25/40) in target core and 28% (15/40) in systematic core. The overall significant cancer detection rate was 46% (26/56): 69% (18/26) in target vs 31% (8/26) in random cores. Conclusions: The incidence of clinical significant cancer was 46% in men starting active surveillance, but it was more than doubled using MRI/US Target Biopsy 69% (18/26) rather than random cores (31%, 8/26). However, 1/3 of disease upgrades would have been missed if only the targeted biopsies were performed. Based on our experience, MRI/US fusion target biopsy must be associated to systematic biopsies to improve detection of significant cancer, reducing the risks of misclassification.

Pathologic outcomes of MRI invisible tumors in prostate cancer.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 282-282
Author(s):  
Sandeep Gurram ◽  
Amir H. Lebastchi ◽  
Michael Ahdoot ◽  
Alex Z. Wang ◽  
Bradford J. Wood ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Cancer Detection ◽  
Detection Rate ◽  
Transrectal Ultrasound ◽  
Cancer Detection Rate ◽  
Diagnostic Challenge ◽  
Fusion Biopsy ◽  
Sextant Biopsy ◽  
Magnetic Resonance Imaging Mri ◽  
Over Time

282 Background: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) invisible tumors are a diagnostic challenge in prostate cancer due to the lack of ability to reliably monitor these lesions radiographically or pathologically. The progression and natural history of these lesions are unknown and outcomes over time are unclear. Methods: Men with multiparametric MRI of the prostate and MRI/Transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) fusion guided biopsy were assessed for the presence of MRI invisible tumors (MIT). An MIT is defined as cancer detected only on extended sextant biopsy and not visible on MRI. All men first underwent an MRI/TRUS fusion biopsy with tracked extended sextant biopsy which originally detected the MIT. The original biopsy needle course sampling these MITs was tracked and set as a future target using the MRI/TRUS fusion platform. Men subsequently underwent a combined MRI/TRUS fusion biopsy, systematic extended sextant biopsy, and a Targeted Tracked biopsy of the MIT (TT-MIT) that was recorded and tracked from the original biopsy. We describe the outcomes of tracking these MITs and compare the ability to monitor them with TT-MIT biopsy as opposed to systematic extended sextant biopsy. Results: 105 MITs were identified, 84 (80%) of which were originally Gleason 6 tumors. The median time between biopsies was 16.6 months. The overall cancer detection rate with TT-MIT was 77.4% compared to 59.7% using systematic extended sextant biopsy. Using TT-MIT, these invisible tumors showed higher Gleason scores in 16 (15.2%) tumors. When TT-MIT was compared to the systematic extended sextant biopsy sampling the corresponding location, it showed increased Gleason scores in 30 (28.6%) MITs while 58 (55.2%) showed concordant pathology and 17 (16.2%) showed less aggressive pathology. Conclusions: The ability to follow MRI invisible tumors suggests that these tumors are more effectively tracked using TT-MIT biopsy technique. These MITs change over time and 15% of them will upgrade to higher Gleason scores. Tracking these tumors with TT-MIT biopsy increases cancer detection rate compared to standard sextant biopsy and more accurately samples these MITs, unveiling a more aggressive pathology.

scholarly journals MRI-Targeted Biopsies versus Systematic Transrectal Ultrasound Guided Biopsies for the Diagnosis of Localized Prostate Cancer in Biopsy Naïve Men

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexandre Peltier ◽  
Fouad Aoun ◽  
Marc Lemort ◽  
Félix Kwizera ◽  
Marianne Paesmans ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Gleason Score ◽  
Cancer Detection ◽  
Detection Rate ◽  
Transrectal Ultrasound ◽  
Cancer Detection Rate ◽  
Targeted Biopsy ◽  
Clinically Significant ◽  
A Prospective Study ◽  
Significant Disease

Introduction. To compare, in the same cohort of men, the detection of clinically significant disease in standard (STD) cores versus multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) targeted (TAR) cores.Material and Methods. A prospective study was conducted on 129 biopsy naïve men with clinical suspicion of prostate cancer. These patients underwent prebiopsy mpMRI with STD systematic biopsies and TAR biopsies when lesions were found. The agreement between the TAR and the STD protocols was measured using Cohen’s kappa coefficient.Results. Cancer detection rate of MRI-targeted biopsy was 62.7%. TAR protocol demonstrated higher detection rate of clinically significant disease compared to STD protocol. The proportion of cores positive for clinically significant cancer in TAR cores was 28.9% versus 9.8% for STD cores (P<0.001). The proportion of men with clinically significant cancer and the proportion of men with Gleason score 7 were higher with the TAR protocol than with the STD protocol (P=0.003;P=0.0008, resp.).Conclusion. mpMRI improved clinically significant prostate cancer detection rate compared to STD protocol alone with less tissue sampling and higher Gleason score. Further development in imaging as well as multicentre studies using the START recommendation is needed to elucidate the role of mpMRI targeted biopsy in the management of prostate cancer.

scholarly journals Detection rate for significant cancer at confirmatory biopsy in men enrolled in Active Surveillance protocol: 20 cores vs 30 cores vs MRI/TRUS fusion prostate biopsy

2016 ◽  
Vol 88 (4) ◽  
pp. 300 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pietro Pepe ◽  
Sebastiano Cimino ◽  
Antonio Garufi ◽  
Giandomenico Priolo ◽  
Giorgio Ivan Russo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Active Surveillance ◽  
Detection Rate ◽  
Targeted Biopsy ◽  
3.0 Tesla ◽  
Fusion Biopsy ◽  
Saturation Biopsy ◽  
Positive Biopsy ◽  
Positive Core ◽  
Single Positive ◽  
Clinically Significant

Introduction: The detection rate for significant prostate cancer of extended vs saturation vs mMRI/TRUS fusion biopsy was prospectively evaluated in men enrolled in active surveillance (AS) protocol. Mterials and methods: From May 2013 to September 2016 75 men aged 66 years (median) with very low risk PCa were enrolled in an AS protocol and elegible criteria were: life expectancy greater than 10 years, cT1C, PSA below 10 ng/ml, PSA density &lt; 0.20, 2 &lt; unilateral positive biopsy cores, Gleason score (GS) equal to 6, greatest percentage of cancer (GPC) in a core &lt; 50%. All patients underwent 3.0 Tesla pelvic mpMRI before confirmatory transperineal extended (20 cores) or saturation biopsy (SPBx; 30 cores) combined with mpMRI/TRUS fusion targeted biopsy (4 cores) of suspicious lesions (PI-RADS 3-5). Results: 21/75 (28%) patients were reclassified by SPBx based on upgraded GS ≥ 7; mpMRI lesions PI-RADS 4-5 vs PI-RADS 3-5 diagnosed 9/21 (42.8%) vs 16/21 (76.2%) significant PCa with 2 false positives (6.5%). The detection rate for significant PCa was equal to 76.2% (mpMRI/TRUS fusion biopsy) vs 81% (extended) vs 100% (SPBx) (p = 0.001); mpMRI/TRUS targeted biopsy and extended biopsy missed 5/21 (23.8%) and 4/21 (19%) significant PCa which were found by SPBx (p = 0.001) being characterised by the presence of a single positive core of GS ≥ 7 with GPC &lt; 10%. Conclusions: Although mpMRI improve the diagnosis of clinically significant PCa, SPBx is provided of the best detection rate for PCa in men enrolled in AS protocols who underwent confirmatory biopsy.

Role of core location in targeted MRI-ultrasound fusion biopsy of prostate lesions.

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 136-136
Author(s):  
Amanda Lu ◽  
Kamyar Ghabili ◽  
Kevin Nguyen ◽  
Preston Sprenkle
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Cancer Detection ◽  
High Volume ◽  
Central Core ◽  
Lesion Volume ◽  
Fusion Biopsy ◽  
Detection Rates ◽  
Clinically Significant ◽  
Targeted Mri

136 Background: Targeted mpMRI fusion biopsy has gained adoption with superior clinically significant cancer detection rates and accuracy over template biopsy. We sought to establish the role of biopsy location within a prostate lesion to detect clinically significant prostate cancer. Methods: From Nov 2016-Aug 2017, 110 patients with positive multiparametric-MRI (mpMRI) underwent targeted and systematic MRI-US fusion biopsy at our institution for clinical suspicion or known history of prostate cancer. Lesions were scored by Prostate imaging reporting and data system (PI-RADS) classification schema by experienced genitourinary radiologists. Biopsy was performed by an oncology-trained urologist (PS) performing a high volume of fusion biopsies. 5 cores were taken from each lesion, each corresponding to a predetermined location (central, medial, lateral, apex, and base of the lesion). Cancer detection rates (CDR) were calculated on a per lesion basis from biopsy histology. Results: 154 prostate lesions were identified and biopsied with an average volume of 1.31 mL. Detection of clinically significant cancer (G>3+4) did not differ significantly among the 5 locations (Table 1). The central core detected slightly more G≥3+4 cancers than the apex core. No concordance of pathology grade was found between the central core and location of the peripheral core (medial, lateral, apex, or base). In 32% (50/154) of lesions, the peripheral cores had a higher Gleason score than the central core. Biopsy of only the central core missed 40% (21/52) of G≥3+4 cancers and 17% (4/24) of G>3+4 cancers. Lesions with higher PIRADs score were more likely to detect cancer in both the central and peripheral cores, but lesion volume was not a significant predictor. Conclusions: Location of biopsy cores within mpMRI-identified prostate lesions has little correlation with detection of clinically significant cancer. However, targeted biopsy of only the center of a lesion can miss 17% of Gleason >3+4 cancers. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals Surface-projection-based transperineal cognitive fusion targeted biopsy of the prostate: an original technique with a good cancer detection rate

BMC Urology ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lei Wang ◽  
Xiaofei Wang ◽  
Wenfeng Zhao ◽  
Zichen Zhao ◽  
Zhihu Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Detection ◽  
Prostate Biopsy ◽  
Detection Rate ◽  
Transrectal Ultrasound ◽  
Targeted Biopsy ◽  
Cognitive Fusion ◽  
Transperineal Prostate Biopsy ◽  
Surface Projection ◽  
Positive Rate ◽  
Clinically Significant

Abstract Background To report a new standardized cognitive fusion technique on transperineal targeted biopsy (TB) of prostate, and to evaluate its efficacy for cancer detection combined with systematic biopsy (SB) . Methods We present a retrospective review of consecutive patients undergoing multiparametric magnetic resonance (mpMRI) imaging of the prostate with subsequent transperineal prostate biopsy from January 2016 to December 2018. A free-hand 12-core SB was performed for each patient. PI-RADS 3–5 lesions were further targeted for biopsy with our TB technique. Firstly, a central point of suspicious lesion (B′) was registered cognitively on a transverse section of transrectal ultrasound (TRUS). Then, biopsy gun punctured vertically through a fixed pioneer site (A) on skin of perineum, and deep into the TRUS section to get A’. Next, targeted site (B), the surface-projection of B′, would be determined on skin of perineum by A and distance from B′ to A’. Finally, puncture through B to reach B′. Pathological findings of SB and TB were analyzed. Results A total of 126 patients underwent transperineal prostate biopsy (47 SB only, 79 SB + TB). The age of the patients was 68.7 ± 9.2 years. The median preoperative PSA value was 11.8 ng/mL. Preoperative prostate volume was 60.5 ± 50.0 mL. The numbers of patients with PI-RADS scores of 1 through 5 were 4, 43, 27, 21 and 31, respectively. The overall detection rate of cancer was 61/126 (48.4%), and it was significantly higher in the combination cohort (56/79, 70.9%) compared with the SB only cohort (5/47, 10.6%, p<0.001). When focused on the combination cohort, TB detected a similar overall rate of PCa (53/79, 67.1% vs 52/79, 65.8%; p = 0.87) compared with SB. The clinically significant PCa (csPC) detection rate was 52/79 (65.8%), while for TB and SB the csPC/PC rate was 51/53 (96.2%) and 48/52 (92.3%), respectively(p = 0.44). TB demonstrated a better sampling performance (positive rate for each core) compared with SB (51.0% vs 31.3%, p < 0.001). Conclusions Surface-projection-based transperineal cognitive fusion targeted biopsy of the prostate has a good efficacy in detecting PCa.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document