scholarly journals Atezolizumab: feasible second-line therapy for patients with non-small cell lung cancer? A review of efficacy, safety and place in therapy

2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (12) ◽  
pp. 769-779 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fanny Jean ◽  
Pascale Tomasini ◽  
Fabrice Barlesi

Advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) prognosis is still poor and has recently been reformed by the development of immune checkpoint inhibitors and the approval of anti-PD-1 (programmed cell-death 1) treatments such as nivolumab and pembrolizumab in second line. More recently, atezolizumab (MDPL 3280A), a programmed cell-death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitor, was also studied in this setting. Here, we report a review of the literature assessing the efficacy, safety, and place of atezolizumab in the second-line treatment of advanced NSCLC. We performed a literature search of PubMed, American Society of Clinical Oncology, European Society of Medical Oncology and World Conference on Lung Cancer meetings. Atezolizumab showed a good tolerance profile and efficacy in comparison with docetaxel for second-line treatment of advanced NSCLC. Potential predictive biomarkers also have to be assessed.

2018 ◽  
Vol 25 ◽  
pp. 94 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Pabani ◽  
C.A. Butts

For patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (nsclc) lacking a targetable molecular driver, the mainstay of treatment has been cytotoxic chemotherapy. The survival benefit of chemotherapy in this setting is modest and comes with the potential for significant toxicity. The introduction of immunotherapeutic agents targeting the programmed cell death 1 protein (PD-1) and the programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) has drastically changed the treatment paradigms for these patients. Three agents—atezolizumab, nivolumab, and pembrolizumab—have been shown to be superior to chemotherapy in the second-line setting. For patients with tumours strongly expressing PD-L1, pembrolizumab has been associated with improved outcomes in the first-line setting.Demonstration of the significant benefits of immunotherapy in nsclc has focused attention on new questions. Combination checkpoint regimens, with acceptable toxicity and potentially enhanced efficacy, have been developed, as have combinations of immunotherapy with chemotherapy. In this review, we focus on the published trials that have changed the treatment landscape in advanced nsclc and on the ongoing clinical trials that offer hope to further improve outcomes for patients with advanced nsclc.


2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e21068-e21068
Author(s):  
Zhiqiao Xu ◽  
Yan Zhang

e21068 Background: Docetaxel is a standard second line treatment in advanced NSCLC, but the treatment effect is limited. Previous studies, such as REVEL, demonstrated that anti angiogenic therapy combined with docetaxel had significantly therapeutic efficacy. Anlotinib is an oral multi target angiogenesis TKI targeting the VEGFR, FGFR, PDGFR and c Kit. The ALTER 0303 trial showed that anlotinib improved both PFS and OS in later-line treatment for advanced NSCLC, and this study aims to investigate the efficacy and safety of Anlotinib combined with docetaxel in second-line treatment in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods: This is a single-center, single-arm clinical trial. A group of 30 patients of histologically or cytologically confirmed, locally advanced stage IIIB-IV NSCLC and with ECOG PS 0-1 were admitted to the Kaifeng Central Hospital Cancer Center. Patients who progressed after first-line treatment were treated with anlotinib (12 mg p.o., QD d1 to 14, q3w) combined with docetaxel (75mg/m2, iv, QD, d1 to 14, q3w) as the second-line therapy. The primary endpoint was PFS. Secondary endpoints were OS, objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR) and safety. Results: A total of 30 patients were enrolled from October 2018 to April 2020. At data cutoff (Sept. 30, 2020), 30 patients were available for efficacy analysis. The median progression-free survival (mPFS) was 7.5 months (2.0-18.5). Among these patients, there was 1 CR, 9 PR, 15 SD, 5 PD, resulting in the ORR = 33.33% and the DCR = 83.33%. The Cox multivariate analysis showed that stage is an independent risk factor affecting prognosis ( p= 0.003). The most common grade 3 AEs were leukopenia (23,3%), neutropenia (13.3%), hypertension (13.3%), which can be controlled, and no grade 4 or grade 5 AEs occurred. Conclusions: Second line anlotinib plus docetaxel showed clinical benefit in advanced NSCLC patients in terms of PFS, ORR and DCR, and the incidence of adverse reactions are tolerable. This combination might be a promising option for patients advanced NSCLC.


2021 ◽  
Vol 13 ◽  
pp. 175883592199296
Author(s):  
Jingjing Qu ◽  
Quanhui Mei ◽  
Li Liu ◽  
Tianli Cheng ◽  
Peng Wang ◽  
...  

The use of programmed cell-death protein 1 (PD-1)/programmed cell-death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors is the standard therapy for the first-line or second-line treatment of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In contrast to current traditional treatments such as chemotherapy or radiotherapy, anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 treatments can directly attenuate tumour-mediated exhaustion and effectively modulate the host anti-tumour immune response in vivo. In addition, compared with traditional therapy, PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor monotherapy can significantly prolong survival without obvious side effects in the treatment of advanced NSCLC. Ideally, several biomarkers could be used to monitor the safety and effectiveness of anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 treatments; however, the current lack of optimal prognostic markers remains a widespread limitation and challenge for further clinical applications, as does the possibility of immune-related adverse events and drug resistance. In this review, we aimed to summarise the latest progress in anti-PD-1/anti-PD-L1 treatment of advanced NSCLC, worldwide, including in China. An exploration of underlying biomarker identification and future challenges will be discussed in this article to facilitate translational studies in cancer immunotherapy.


2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 18156-18156
Author(s):  
M. Joppert ◽  
R. Boccia ◽  
S. Dakhil ◽  
R. Steis

18156 Background: In preclinical and early clinical trials, single-agent vinflunine (a novel microtubule inhibitor) has shown activity in a variety of tumors, including non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The purpose of this phase II, single-arm study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of vinflunine administration every 3 weeks to patients with advanced NSCLC who have progressed after prior treatment with a platinum-based doublet. The primary endpoint is 1-year survival rate. This report presents preliminary safety information demonstrating the safety and tolerability of this combination. Methods: Patients = 18 years with confirmed advanced NSCLC (stage IIIB with malignant pleural effusions or stage IV) that have progressed after receiving a platinum-based doublet as first-line therapy, received vinflunine (320 mg/m2) as a 20-minute IV infusion on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle. Results: At the time of analysis, 36 patients (of a planned total of 75) have received study treatment. Patient characteristics include: gender male/female, 24/12; median age 68.5 years (range 42–86); ECOG performance status 0/1, 10/26; and race Caucasian/Black, 34/2. The median number of cycles administered was 2 (range 1–9). Fourteen patients are still on study. The most common toxicities (NCI CTC version 2), regardless of causality, were Grade 3 fatigue (14.3%), asthenia (8.6%), neutropenia (8.6%), constipation (5.7%), cough (5.7%), dehydration (5.7%), vomiting (5.7%), dyspnea (5.7%), and ileus (5.7%). Grade 4 toxicities were neutropenia (22.9%) and change in mental status (5.7%). There were 5 deaths (2 from progressive disease, 1 from respiratory distress, 1 from coronary artery disease, and 1 case of sepsis possibly related to study drug). Conclusions: These preliminary results suggest that vinflunine has a manageable safety profile when used as a single agent for second-line treatment of patients with advanced NSCLC. Supported by Bristol-Myers Squibb. [Table: see text]


2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Takeo Hasegawa ◽  
Yuki Ozaki ◽  
Takuya Inoue ◽  
Yuzuru Watanabe ◽  
Mitsuro Fukuhara ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy has changed the standard drug therapy for relapsed or advanced non-small cell lung cancer; its efficacy is well-recognized by pulmonary physicians, oncologists, and thoracic surgeons. Nivolumab, one of the anti-programmed cell death 1 antibodies, was the first immune checkpoint inhibitor to be approved and is used as a standard second-line regimen for patients with non-small cell lung cancer irrespective of the expression of programmed cell death ligand 1. Programmed cell death 1 antibodies have been generally confirmed to be less toxic than conventional cytotoxic chemotherapy, although unusual immune-related adverse events such as type I diabetes mellitus, adrenal failure, and myasthenia gravis may occur with a very low incidence. A case of severe grade V immune-related thrombocytopenia after two courses of nivolumab as second-line therapy for relapsed non-small cell lung cancer is reported. Case presentation An 82-year-old Japanese woman with relapsed lung adenocarcinoma was treated with nivolumab as second-line systemic therapy at our institute. Her laboratory data indicated thrombocytopenia suspected to be an immune-related adverse event following two courses of nivolumab. Subsequently, she developed a massive pulmonary hemorrhage and left cerebral infarction despite intensive treatment including systemic steroid therapy. Although there have been a few reports of thrombocytopenia caused by nivolumab, this is the first report of grade V thrombocytopenia following administration of nivolumab for relapsed non-small cell lung cancer. Conclusion A very difficult case of grade V immune-related thrombocytopenia after the administration of nivolumab as second-line therapy for relapsed lung adenocarcinoma was described. Immune-related thrombocytopenia is a rare adverse event, but it must be considered a possible complication because it may become critical once it has occurred.


2015 ◽  
Vol 18 (7) ◽  
pp. A457-A458 ◽  
Author(s):  
C Graham ◽  
H Knox ◽  
LM Hess ◽  
M Jen ◽  
G Cuyun Carter ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (36) ◽  
pp. 4501-4507 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea Ardizzoni ◽  
Marcello Tiseo ◽  
Luca Boni ◽  
Andrew D. Vincent ◽  
Rodolfo Passalacqua ◽  
...  

Purpose To compare efficacy of pemetrexed versus pemetrexed plus carboplatin in pretreated patients with advanced non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Patients and Methods Patients with advanced NSCLC, in progression during or after first-line platinum-based chemotherapy, were randomly assigned to receive pemetrexed (arm A) or pemetrexed plus carboplatin (arm B). Primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). A preplanned pooled analysis of the results of this study with those of the NVALT7 study was carried out to assess the impact of carboplatin added to pemetrexed in terms of overall survival (OS). Results From July 2007 to October 2009, 239 patients (arm A, n = 120; arm B, n = 119) were enrolled. Median PFS was 3.6 months for arm A versus 3.5 months for arm B (hazard ratio [HR], 1.05; 95% CI, 0.81 to 1.36; P = .706). No statistically significant differences in response rate, OS, or toxicity were observed. A total of 479 patients were included in the pooled analysis. OS was not improved by the addition of carboplatin to pemetrexed (HR, 90; 95% CI, 0.74 to 1.10; P = .316; P heterogeneity = .495). In the subgroup analyses, the addition of carboplatin to pemetrexed in patients with squamous tumors led to a statistically significant improvement in OS from 5.4 to 9 months (adjusted HR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.37 to 0.91; P interaction test = .039). Conclusion Second-line treatment of advanced NSCLC with pemetrexed plus carboplatin does not improve survival outcomes as compared with single-agent pemetrexed. The benefit observed with carboplatin addition in squamous tumors may warrant further investigation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document