Simultaneous First Metatarsophalangeal Joint Arthrodesis and Sesamoidectomy With a Single Dorsomedial Incision

2014 ◽  
Vol 7 (5) ◽  
pp. 403-408 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammed T. Alshouli ◽  
Albert Lin ◽  
Anish Raj Kadakia
Keyword(s):  
Case Series ◽  
Metatarsophalangeal Joint ◽  
Clinical Results ◽  
Hallux Rigidus ◽  
Surgical Time ◽  
First Metatarsophalangeal Joint ◽  
End Stage ◽  
Toe Deformity ◽  
Arthritic Changes ◽  
Separate Incision

First metatarsophalangeal (MTP) arthrodesis is a well-accepted procedure for the treatment of end-stage hallux rigidus. Despite the excellent and predictable clinical results, the procedure does not address the metatarso-sesamoid joint complex. There has been one case report of arthritis of the metatarsal sesamoid joint as uncommon cause of post–arthrodesis hallux pain. Additionally, we have noted this complication in our practice as well despite the paucity of reported cases in the published literature. Resection of either the tibial or fibular sesamoid is an acceptable treatment for recalcitrant sesamoid pain; however, resection of both the tibial and fibular sesamoids as would be required for arthritic changes is not encouraged to prevent the risk of a cock-up toe deformity. Arthrodesis of the first MTP joint eliminates the possibility of this complication. Resection of the sesamoids following a first MTP fusion requires a separate incision with additional morbidity and risk to the medial plantar digital nerve. This second surgical intervention is not without morbidity and carries additional cast to the patient, which can be avoided if the pathology is appropriately identified preoperatively. We describe the surgical indications and novel technique for a first MTP arthrodesis and total sesamoid resection through a standard dorsomedial incision. The approach adds minimal surgical time and morbidity and eliminates the source of plantar first MTP pain that is present in a cohort of patients with hallux rigidus. Levels of Evidence: Level IV, Case Series

scholarly journals Treatment of End-Stage Hallux Rigidus and Impact of Arthrodesis versus Arthroplasty on Patient Reported Outcomes

2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 2473011417S0001
Author(s):  
Monique Chambers ◽  
MaCalus Hogan ◽  
Dukens LaBaze
Keyword(s):  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Surgical Intervention ◽  
Metatarsophalangeal Joint ◽  
Hallux Rigidus ◽  
First Metatarsophalangeal Joint ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Outcome Scores ◽  
Vas Scores ◽  
End Stage

Category: Bunion, Midfoot/Forefoot Introduction/Purpose: Hallux rigidus is a degenerative disease of the first metatarsophalangeal joint. Severe, end-stage hallux rigidus can become debilitating with surgical intervention becoming necessary once conservative measures and shoe modifications have failed. Joint salvage procedures include metatarsal phalangeal (MTP) arthrodesis and MTP arthroplasty. The purpose of this study was to assess for differences in patient reported outcomes in two cohorts who underwent fusion or joint reconstruction. Methods: This study was a retrospective review of prospectively collected data of 385 patients from an academic medical institution. Patients who underwent surgical intervention from July 2015 to November 2016 were identified based on CPT codes for MTP arthrodesis (28750) and arthroplasty (28293). We extracted outcome scores including SF12-M, SF12-P, FAAM, and VAS scores. Exclusion criteria included poly-trauma, revision procedures, and lack of pre and post-operative outcome scores. Mann- Whitney t-test was performed using GraphPad Prism version 7.0b for Mac to compare procedure groups, with significance define by a p-value of 0.05. Results: A total of eighteen patients met the inclusion criteria, with 6 who underwent arthroplasty and 12 arthrodesis. The average age was 63.7 amongst the cohort, with a total of 16 female and 2 males. Patients who underwent arthrodesis had better outcomes across all parameters. When comparing preoperative and postoperative scores, arthrodesis patients showed greater improvement of SF12-M (arthrodesis 9 vs arthroplasty -2, p=0.05), and SF12-P (9 vs -16, respectively p=0.05) scores. Arthroplasty patients were more likely to have a decrease in their SF-12 scores. VAS scores and FAAM scores showed no statistical difference between the two cohorts. Postoperative VAS scores were worse in 33% of arthroplasty patients despite surgical intervention, compared to 10% of arthrodesis patients. Conclusion: Our results suggests that both procedures provide a statistically significant difference in pain with several patients having a Global Rate of Change that is “very much better”. However, fusion of the metatarsophalangeal joint results in improved pain and functional outcomes for patients with severe hallux rigidus. These findings are consistent with current reports in the literature, which are mostly case series reports. Larger studies are needed to provide appropriate power and better support the findings of this study.

scholarly journals Treatment of hallux rigidus with percutaneous arthrodesis

2018 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 90-95
Author(s):  
Vitor Baltazar Nogueira ◽  
Miguel Viana Pereira Filho ◽  
Mauro Cesar Mattos e Dinato ◽  
Márcio De Faria Freitas ◽  
Rodrigo Gonçalves Pagnano
Keyword(s):  
Medical Records ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Metatarsophalangeal Joint ◽  
Conventional Technique ◽  
Hallux Rigidus ◽  
Time Level ◽  
First Metatarsophalangeal Joint ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Pain Improvement ◽  
Consolidation Time

Objective: The objective of this study was to describe the percutaneous arthrodesis technique with single medial portal of the first metatarsophalangeal joint and to evaluate the results of a series of nine cases (10 feet) with a diagnosis of hallux rigidus subjected to this technique, comparing the results with literature data regarding the conventional technique. Methods: This was a retrospective, observational study performed by analysis of medical records and radiographs of nine patients undergoing percutaneous arthrodesis of the hallux metatarsophalangeal joint. Gender, age, consolidation time, level of postoperative pain and degree of patient satisfaction were evaluated. Results: Eight patients were female, and one patient was male. The mean age was 68.7 years, the mean consolidation time was 8 weeks, the consolidation ratio was 70%, there was pain improvement in the postoperative period, and all patients considered themselves satisfied with the surgery. Conclusion: Percutaneous arthrodesis of the metatarsophalangeal hallux joint potentially yields results similar to those of the conventional method demonstrated in the literature but uses smaller incisions.Level of Evidence IV, Therapeutic Studies, Case Series.

Evaluation of Metatarsal Head Resurfacing Hemiarthroplasty in the Surgical Treatment of Hallux Rigidus: A Retrospective Study and Mid- to Long-Term Follow-up

2017 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 22-31 ◽  
Author(s):  
Musa Uğur Mermerkaya ◽  
Erkan Alkan ◽  
Mehmet Ayvaz
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Treatment ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Metatarsophalangeal Joint ◽  
Metatarsal Head ◽  
Treatment Method ◽  
Hallux Rigidus ◽  
Retrospective Case ◽  
First Metatarsophalangeal Joint

Background. The aim of this study was to evaluate the mid- to long-term outcomes of metatarsal head resurfacing hemiarthroplasty in the surgical treatment of advanced-stage hallux rigidus. Methods. We performed a retrospective review of 57 consecutive patients (25 [43.9%] males, 32 [56.1%] females; mean age, 61.0 ± 6.4 years) who underwent first metatarsal head resurfacing hemiarthroplasty (HemiCAP) for hallux rigidus between August 2007 and September 2010. Sixty-five implantations were performed in 57 patients; 8 patients underwent bilateral procedures. All patients were clinically rated prior to surgery and at the final follow-up visit using the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) hallux metatarsophalangeal-interphalangeal scale and first metatarsophalangeal joint range of motion (MTPJ ROM). Results. The median follow-up duration was 81 (range = 8-98) months. The median preoperative AOFAS score was 34 (range = 22-59) points, which had increased to 83 (range = 26-97) points at the final follow-up visit (P < .001). The median preoperative first MTPJ ROM was 25° (range = 15° to 40°), which had increased to 75° (range = 30° to 85°) at the final follow-up visit (P < .001). Conclusions. First MTPJ hemiarthroplasty is an effective treatment method that recovers toe function and first MTPJ ROM, and provides good mid- to long-term functional outcomes. Levels of Evidence: Level IV: Retrospective case series

The Effects of Cheilectomy on Dorsiflexion of the First Metatarsophalangeal Joint

1997 ◽  
Vol 18 (12) ◽  
pp. 803-808 ◽  
Author(s):  
William A. Heller ◽  
Michael E. Brage
Keyword(s):  
Proximal Phalanx ◽  
Metatarsophalangeal Joint ◽  
Metatarsal Head ◽  
Hallux Rigidus ◽  
Surface Velocity ◽  
First Metatarsophalangeal Joint ◽  
Motion Patterns ◽  
Custom Made ◽  
Fresh Frozen ◽  
End Stage

Our purpose in this study was to determine the effects of cheilectomy on the mechanics of dorsiflexion of the first metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joint. Ten fresh-frozen cadaver feet were utilized, of which two demonstrated radiographic evidence of hallux rigidus. Each specimen was rigidly mounted on a custom-made slide tray that was articulated with a hinge mechanism designed to dorsiflex the first MTP joint. Range-of-motion measurements were made on the first MTP joint. Cheilectomy of 30% of the metatarsal head diameter was performed. Lateral radiographs with the beam centered on the MTP joint were taken with the joint at neutral, 20°, 40°, and at the limits of dorsiflexion. This process was repeated after a 50% cheilectomy was performed. The radiographs were examined for changes in joint congruence and in patterns of surface motion as the hallux moved from neutral to full dorsiflexion. Instant centers of rotation were determined by a method first described by Rouleaux. We constructed surface velocity vectors to describe patterns of motion of the first MTP joint. The mean dorsiflexion of the first MTP joint was 67.9° and increased to 78.3° after 30% cheilectomy. The increase in dorsiflexion was significantly greater in the two specimens with hallux rigidus (33%) than in the other specimens (12.1%). After both levels of cheilectomy, the proximal phalanx demonstrated pivoting at the resection site on the metatarsal head. This pivoting resulted in abnormal motion patterns across the MTP joint. Normal sliding motion predominated in early dorsiflexion, with compression peaking at the end stage of dorsiflexion, producing jamming of the articular surfaces. Cheilectomy significantly increased dorsiflexion of the MTP joint, but resulted in abnormal motion patterns. The increase in dorsiflexion resulted from pivoting of the proximal phalanx on the metatarsal head, resulting in anomalous velocity vectors and compression across the MTP joint.

Silastic first metatarsophalangeal joint arthroplasty for the treatment of end-stage hallux rigidus

2020 ◽  
Vol 102-B (2) ◽  
pp. 220-226 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timothy M. Clough ◽  
Joseph Ring
Keyword(s):  
Metatarsophalangeal Joint ◽  
Visual Analogue Score ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome Measures ◽  
Hallux Rigidus ◽  
First Metatarsophalangeal Joint ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Silastic Implant ◽  
The Mean ◽  
End Stage

Aims Arthroplasty for end-stage hallux rigidus (HR) is controversial. Arthrodesis remains the gold standard for surgical treatment, although is not without its complications, with rates of up to 10% for nonunion, 14% for reoperation and 10% for metatarsalgia. The aim of this study was to analyze the outcome of a double-stemmed silastic implant (Wright-Medical, Memphis, Tennessee, USA) for patients with end-stage HR. Methods We conducted a retrospective review of 108 consecutive implants in 76 patients, between January 2005 and December 2016, with a minimum follow-up of two years. The mean age of the patients at the time of surgery was 61.6 years (42 to 84). There were 104 females and four males. Clinical, radiological, patient reported outcome measures (PROMS) data, a visual analogue score (VAS) for pain, and satisfaction scores were collected. Results The survivorship at a mean follow-up of 5.3 years (2.1 to 14.1) was 97.2%. The mean Manchester Oxford Foot and Ankle Questionnaire (MOXFQ) scores improved from 78.1 to 11.0, and VAS scores for pain from 7/10 to 1.3/10. The rate of satisfaction was 90.6%. Three implants (2.8%) required revision; one for infection, one-month postoperatively, and two for stem breakage at 10.4 and 13.3 years postoperatively. There was a 1.9% reoperation rate other than revision, 23.1% of patients developed a minor complication, and 21.1% of patients had non-progressive and asymptomatic cysts on radiological review. Conclusion We report a 97.2% survivorship at a mean follow-up of 5.3 years with this implant. We did not find progressive osteolysis, as has been previously reported. These results suggest that this double-stemmed silastic implant provides a predictable and reliable alternative with comparable outcomes to arthrodesis for the treatment of end-stage HR. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(2):220–226.

Rolled Tendon Allograft Interposition Arthroplasty for Salvage Surgery of the Hallux Metatarsophalangeal Joint

2018 ◽  
Vol 39 (4) ◽  
pp. 458-462 ◽  
Author(s):  
Danielle Thomas ◽  
David Thordarson
Keyword(s):  
Operative Procedure ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Metatarsophalangeal Joint ◽  
Joint Space ◽  
Hallux Rigidus ◽  
Salvage Treatment ◽  
High Rate ◽  
Interposition Arthroplasty ◽  
First Metatarsophalangeal Joint ◽  
Interpositional Arthroplasty

Background: Hallux rigidus is a common osteoarthritic disease of the first metatarsophalangeal joint (MTPJ). Few salvage treatment options exist that preserve motion for patients who have failed an initial procedure and who are not amenable to fusion, typically patients who are active or who would like to wear high heels. Allograft tendon interpositional arthroplasty is an unconventional salvage treatment option that may preserve motion and prevent bone loss. Methods: A retrospective chart review is reported of 19 patients who failed previous procedures and refused fusion who underwent allograft tendon interpositional arthroplasty of the hallux MTPJ by a single surgeon between 2012 and 2015. Outcomes included the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) hallux metatarsophalangeal-interphalangeal scale assessment as well as measurement of apparent joint space on anterior to posterior and lateral views. Results: The cumulative average AOFAS score for all patients was 68.5 preoperatively and 74.1 postoperatively. The average AOFAS pain subscore was 24.7 preoperatively and 26.8 postoperatively (SD = 7.7 and 13.8, respectively). Radiographically, patients had an increase in apparent joint space from pre- to postoperatively, most notable on the lateral view (0.6 to 4.7 mm; SD = 0.7 and 3.2 mm). Five patients required a second operative procedure, for an overall 26% reoperation rate. One patient underwent hallux MTPJ fusion after the interpositional arthroplasty. An additional 4 patients (21%) had symptoms requiring a steroid injection, and another 3 patients (16%) were recommended to undergo a revision procedure based on their symptoms. Conclusion: Rolled allograft tendon interposition arthroplasty performed poorly as a salvage strategy for failed previous hallux MTPJ surgery for hallux rigidus because of a high rate of complication and minimal benefits. The senior author has abandoned the technique. Level of Evidence: Level IV, retrospective case series.

scholarly journals Consumer Prices for Surgical Management of End-Stage Hallux Rigidus

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 2473011419S0007
Author(s):  
Niall A. Smyth ◽  
Vaishnavi Krishnan ◽  
Johnathon R. McCormick ◽  
Jonathan R. Kaplan ◽  
Amiethab A. Aiyer
Keyword(s):  
Metatarsophalangeal Joint ◽  
Hallux Rigidus ◽  
Treatment Modalities ◽  
Potential Cost ◽  
First Metatarsophalangeal Joint ◽  
Consumer Prices ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Mean ◽  
End Stage

Category: Midfoot/Forefoot, Healthcare economics Introduction/Purpose: Hallux rigidus is the most prevalent arthritic condition of the foot. Treatment of end-stage disease traditionally consists of a first metatarsophalangeal joint (MTPJ) arthrodesis, however the use of a synthetic cartilage implant is becoming more common. With the high prevalence of disease and implementation of new treatment modalities, healthcare consumers should be aware of the costs associated with management. The purpose of this study was to determine access to the cost and variability in price of first MTPJ arthrodesis and synthetic cartilage implantation. Methods: Forty academic centers were contacted using a standardized patient script. The patient was a 59-year-old female who had failed conservative treatment of hallux rigidus. Each institution was contacted up to three times in an attempt to obtain a full bundled operative quote for a first MTPJ arthrodesis and synthetic cartilage implantation. Results: Twenty centers (50%) provided a quote for first MTPJ arthrodesis and 15 centers (38%) provided a quote for synthetic cartilage implantation. Only 14 centers (35%) were able to provide a quote for both procedures. The mean bundled price for MTPJ arthrodesis was $21,767 (range, $8,417 – $39,265). The mean bundled price for synthetic cartilage implantation was $21,546 (range, $4,903 – $74,145). There was no statistically significant difference between the bundled price for first MTPJ arthrodesis and synthetic cartilage implantation. Conclusion: There was limited availability of consumer prices for first MTPJ arthrodesis and synthetic implantation, therefore impeding healthcare consumers’ decision making. There was a wide range of quotes for both procedures, indicating potential cost savings.

Midterm Outcomes of a Synthetic Cartilage Implant for the First Metatarsophalangeal Joint in Advanced Hallux Rigidus

2018 ◽  
Vol 40 (4) ◽  
pp. 374-383 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark Glazebrook ◽  
Chris M. Blundell ◽  
Dominic O’Dowd ◽  
Dishan Singh ◽  
Gwyneth de Vries ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Case Series ◽  
Metatarsophalangeal Joint ◽  
Hallux Rigidus ◽  
Implant Removal ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
First Metatarsophalangeal Joint ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Pain Visual Analog Scale ◽  
Safety Parameters ◽  
Clinically Significant

Background: A prospective, randomized, noninferiority clinical trial of synthetic cartilage implant hemiarthroplasty for hallux rigidus demonstrated functional outcomes and safety equivalent to first metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joint arthrodesis at 24 months. We prospectively assessed safety and efficacy outcomes for synthetic cartilage implant hemiarthroplasty at a minimum of 5 years. Methods: Of 135 eligible patients from the original trial, 112 (83.0%) were enrolled (mean age, 58.2 ± 8.8 years; 87 females). Pain visual analog scale (VAS), Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) Activities of Daily Living (ADL), and FAAM Sports subscales were completed preoperatively and 2 and 5 years postoperatively. Great toe active dorsiflexion, weightbearing radiographs, secondary procedures, and safety parameters were also evaluated. Results: At 24 months, 14/152 (9.2%) patients had undergone implant removal and conversion to arthrodesis. In years 2 to 5, 9/119 (7.6%) patients underwent implant removal and conversion to arthrodesis. At mean 5.8 ± 0.7 (range, 4.4-8.0) years’ follow-up, pain VAS, FAAM ADL, and FAAM Sports scores improved by 57.9 ± 18.6 points, 33.0 ± 17.6 points, and 47.9 ± 27.1 points, respectively, from baseline. Clinically significant changes in VAS pain, FAAM ADL, and FAAM Sports were reported by 103/106 (97.2%), 95/105 (90.5%), and 97/104 (93.3%) patients, respectively. Patient-reported outcomes at 24 months were maintained at 5.8 years in patients who were not revised. Active MTP joint peak dorsiflexion was maintained. Ninety-nine of 106 (93.4%) patients would have the procedure again. Conclusion: Clinical and safety outcomes for synthetic cartilage implant hemiarthroplasty observed at 2 years were maintained at 5.8 years. The implant remains a viable treatment option to decrease pain, improve function, and maintain motion for advanced hallux rigidus. Level of Evidence: Level IV, case series.

scholarly journals Comparing First Metatarsophalangeal Joint Flexibility in Hallux Rigidus Patients Pre- and Postcheilectomy Using a Novel Flexibility Device

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 247301142093000 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jensen K. Henry ◽  
Andrew Kraszewski ◽  
Lauren Volpert ◽  
Elizabeth Cody ◽  
Howard Hillstrom ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Proximal Phalanx ◽  
Metatarsophalangeal Joint ◽  
Clinical Results ◽  
Hallux Rigidus ◽  
Wedge Osteotomy ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
First Metatarsophalangeal Joint ◽  
Radiographic Findings ◽  
Pain Symptoms ◽  
Flexibility Parameters

Background: Hallux rigidus (HR) is a common pathology of the first metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joint causing pain and stiffness. However, severity of symptoms and radiographic findings are not always concordant. A novel flexibility device, which measures the mobility of the MTP joint through its arc of motion, has been validated. This study compares flexibility in patients before and after cheilectomy (with or without proximal phalanx osteotomy) for HR. Methods: This is a single-center study of adult patients with HR who were indicated for cheilectomy or cheilectomy and Moberg (dorsiflexion closing wedge) osteotomy of the proximal phalanx based on symptoms and radiographs from 2013 to 2015. Pre- and postoperatively, patients underwent testing with a validated flexibility protocol to generate flexibility curves. Parameters included early and late flexibility, laxity torque, and laxity angle. Patients completed Foot and Ankle Outcomes Scores (FAOS) pre- and postoperatively. Twelve operative patients underwent preoperative testing, with 9 completing postoperative testing (mean age, 53.0 years; 67% female; mean 2.8-year follow-up). Results: Patients had significant improvements in early sitting and standing flexibility, sitting and standing laxity angles, standing laxity torque, and both sitting and standing maximum dorsiflexion after surgery (all P < .05). While preoperative early flexibility, laxity angle, and maximum dorsiflexion all differed significantly between patients and controls ( P < .015), postoperative early flexibility was similar to controls ( P > .279). FAOS scores for pain, symptoms, sport, and quality improved significantly after surgery. Conclusion: Surgical treatment with cheilectomy was associated with significant improvements in nearly all flexibility parameters for sitting and standing positions. However, most postoperative flexibility parameters did not improve to the level of normal controls. Regardless, patients still experienced significant improvements in outcomes. This study demonstrated that surgical correction is associated with significant biomechanical and clinical results. The flexibility device can be used in further studies to assess outcomes after other HR procedures. Level of Evidence: Level II, prospective comparative study.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document