Physiological pseudo-thickened cauda equina associated with dural sac dilatation on magnetic resonance imaging

2021 ◽  
pp. 197140092199897
Author(s):  
Satoshi Matsushima ◽  
Tetsuya Shimizu ◽  
Akira Baba ◽  
Hiroya Ojiri

Objectives In daily clinical practice, the assessment of the thickness of the cauda equina on lumbar spine magnetic resonance imaging is an important parameter. However, its relevance to the size of the dural sac in non-pathological conditions is unknown. To examine the relationship between the size of the dural sac and the apparent thickness of the cauda equina nerve root using lumbar spine magnetic resonance imaging in non-pathological conditions. Methods We retrospectively measured the dural sac diameter and vertebral body diameter, counted the apparent number, and calculated total cross-sectional area of the cauda equina, dural sac ratio and the area of one apparent nerve root of cauda equina in 100 cases. Spearman's rank correlation coefficient ( ρ) was used. Results Dural sac ratio and diameter were positively correlated with the area of one apparent nerve root ( ρ=0.77, P<0.001; ρ=0.74, P<0.001; respectively) and negatively correlated with the apparent number of cauda equina in a single cross-section ( ρ=–0.63, P<0.001; ρ=–0.52, P<0.001; respectively). Conclusions A larger dural sac ratio and diameter was associated with an apparently thicker cauda equina and lower visible number. In a larger dural sac, the physiologically clumped and apparently thicker cauda equina should not be misdiagnosed as pathological.

Spine ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 23 (15) ◽  
pp. 1668-1676 ◽  
Author(s):  
James J. Rankine ◽  
Donal G. Fortune ◽  
Charles E. Hutchinson ◽  
David G. Hughes ◽  
Chris J. Main

Author(s):  
Deniz Bulja ◽  
Jasna Strika ◽  
Merim Jusufbegović ◽  
Muris Bečirčić ◽  
Adnan Šehić ◽  
...  

Introduction: Axial-loaded magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), which can simulate an upright position of the patient may cause a significant reduction of the dural sac cross-sectional area (DCSA) compared with standard MRI, thus providing valuable information in the assessment of the lumbar spinal canal. The purpose of this study was to investigate excessiveness of the change in DCSA and depth of lateral recesses (DLRs) before and after axial-loaded imaging in relation to body mass index (BMI) of the subjects.Methods: Twenty patients were scanned to evaluate DCSA and DLR at three consecutive lumbar spine intervertebral disc levels (L3/4, L4/5, and L5/S1) on conventional-recumbent MRI, and after axial loading were applied.Results: Axial-loaded MRI demonstrates a significant difference of DSCA in comparison to conventional MRI. Furthermore, results show a significant correlation between the DCSA and BMI on level L3/L4, both before and after axial loading MRI. With axial loading, there is a reduction of DSCA of 12.2%, 12.1%, and 2.1% at the levels L3/L4, L4/L5, and L5/S1, respectively. After axial loading has been applied, the depth of the neural foramen has been reduced by an average of 10.1%.Conclusion: Axial-loaded MRI reduces DCSA and DLRs in comparison to standard MRI. Information obtained in this way may be useful to explain the patient’s symptomatology and may provide an additional insight that can influence the treatment decision plan accordingly.


2012 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 130-138 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ali Keshtkaran ◽  
Mohammad Bagheri ◽  
Rahim Ostovar ◽  
Hedayat Salari ◽  
Majid Reza Farrokhi ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 33 (5) ◽  
pp. 443-447 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ajay A Madhavan ◽  
Julie B Guerin ◽  
Laurence J Eckel ◽  
Vance T Lehman ◽  
Carrie M Carr

A 69-year-old female presented with subacute onset ascending weakness and paraesthesias. She was initially diagnosed with Guillain–Barré syndrome (GBS) based on her clinical presentation and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis showing albuminocytological dissociation. However, she was later found to have anti-neuronal nuclear antibody 1 (ANNA-1/anti-Hu)-positive CSF and was subsequently diagnosed with small-cell lung cancer. Her neurological symptoms were ultimately attributed to ANNA-1/anti-Hu-associated paraneoplastic polyneuropathy. During the course of her evaluation, she had magnetic resonance imaging findings of dorsal predominant cauda equina nerve root enhancement, which has not been previously described. The only previously reported case of cauda equina enhancement due to ANNA-1-associated polyneuropathy described ventral predominant findings. The distinction between ventral and dorsal enhancement is important, since it suggests that different patterns of nerve root involvement may be associated with this paraneoplastic syndrome. Therefore, ANNA-1-associated paraneoplastic inflammatory polyneuropathy can be considered in the differential diagnosis of cauda equina nerve root enhancement with ventral and/or dorsal predominance. This can potentially be helpful in differentiating ANNA-1 polyneuropathy from GBS, which classically has ventral predominant enhancement.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document