scholarly journals Long‐term effectiveness of endoscopic screening on incidence and mortality of colorectal cancer: A randomized trial

2013 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 162-168 ◽  
Author(s):  
Espen Thiis‐Evensen ◽  
Mette Kalager ◽  
Michael Bretthauer ◽  
Geir Hoff
2020 ◽  
Vol 158 (6) ◽  
pp. S-1172
Author(s):  
Mingyang Song ◽  
Louise Emilsson ◽  
Bjorn Roelstraete ◽  
Jonas F. Ludvigsson

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 527-527
Author(s):  
Joseph Sung ◽  
Kelvin Kf Tsoi

527 Background: Aspirin, commonly used for prevention of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases, is well-known to protect against colorectal cancer (CRC) development but increase risk of gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB). Few large-scale studies have compared the benefit and risk of long-term aspirin usage. This cohort study aims to evaluate the use of low-dose aspirin to prevent CRC and the risk of GIB associated with the aspirin use. Methods: A population-based clinical dataset was used to compare incidence and mortality of CRC and GIB patients receiving low-dose aspirin with sex-and-age matched controls (in 1:2 ratio). Patients with aspirin≤6 months were excluded. Clinical data of 206,243 aspirin users (mean dose 80 mg/day, mean duration 7.7 years) and 482,966 non-users were included. All patients must have at least 10-year follow up on clinical outcome. Results: Among aspirin users 5,776 (2.80%) were diagnosed with CRC; 2,097 (1.02%) died of the malignancy. 16,483 (3.41%) non-users were diagnosed with CRC; 7,963 (1.65%) died of CRC. Using the cox-proportional hazard regression, aspirin usage showed a modest but significant reduction in CRC mortality (HR = 0.65; 95% CI = 0.62 to 0.69). On the other hand, 11,187 (5.42%) aspirin users developed GIB, and 841 (0.41%) died. 15,186 (3.14%) non-users developed GIB, and 1,682 patients (0.35%) died. Aspirin users showed modest but significant increased risk of GIB-related mortality (HR = 1.24; 95% CI = 1.14 to 1.35). Conclusions: The long-term use of low dose aspirin shows preventive effect on CRC, but also increases the associated GIB risk. Considerations of prophylactic use of aspirin should balance the benefit and the risk of this treatment to the target population. [Table: see text]


2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Enrique Quintero ◽  
Cesare Hassan ◽  
Carlo Senore ◽  
Yutaka Saito

Although faecal and endoscopic tests appear to be effective in reducing colorectal cancer incidence and mortality, further technological and organizational advances are expected to improve the performance and acceptability of these tests. Several attempts to improve endoscopic technology have been made in order to improve the detection rate of neoplasia, especially in the proximal colon. Based on the latest evidence on the long-term efficacy of screening tests, new strategies including endoscopic and faecal modalities have also been proposed in order to improve participation and the diagnostic yield of programmatic screening. Overall, several factors in terms of both efficacy and costs of screening strategies, including the high cost of biological therapy for advanced colorectal cancer, are likely to affect the cost-effectiveness of CRC screening in the future.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document