scholarly journals Histopathology findings of non-mass cancers on breast ultrasound

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (6) ◽  
pp. 205846011877495 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hye Rin Kim ◽  
Hae Kyoung Jung

Background There is little research done on non-mass cancers (NMCs) on breast ultrasound (US). Purpose To evaluate large-sectional histopathology findings of NMCs on breast US. Material and Methods The mammographic and histopathology features of biopsy proven 36 breast cancers which showed pure non-mass lesions on US were retrospectively reviewed. Results The most common mammographic finding was microcalcification (23/35, 65.7%); fine pleomorphic microcalcification was predominant (18/23, 78.3%). The main tumor type was pure ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) (14/36, 38.9%) and DCIS with micro- or minimal invasion (11/36, 30.6%). Among the 25 DCIS, histologic grade was high in 15 (60.0%) and intermediate in nine (36%); comedo necrosis was seen in 17 (68%). Immunohistochemical analysis was available in 27 lesions and showed HER2-overexpression in 12 (44.4%) and triple-negative in two (7.4%). Conclusion According to our limited patient sample, NMCs on breast US were mainly associated with high-grade DCIS.

2019 ◽  
Vol 27 (8) ◽  
pp. 872-875
Author(s):  
Hélène Dano ◽  
Christine Galant ◽  
Maude Coyette ◽  
Mieke R. Van Bockstal

With the advent of screening mammography, the incidence of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) has increased. DCIS accounts for around 20% of breast cancers diagnosed at present. The histiocytoid variant of clear cell DCIS is a rare subtype of DCIS, characterized by epithelial cells with a clear and foamy cytoplasm. Histiocytoid DCIS serves as a potential diagnostic pitfall, since it can be easily mistaken for intraductal collections of foamy macrophages. In this article, we report a particular case of biphasic DCIS, characterized by an extensive histiocytoid-type clear cell component and a conventional “non-clear” cell component. Both components presented with HER2 protein overexpression. We discuss the diagnostic challenge and differential diagnosis of clear cell DCIS, as well as the role of HER2 overexpression in DCIS pathogenesis.


2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (27_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6-6
Author(s):  
G. Von Minckwitz ◽  
S. Darb-Esfahani ◽  
S. Loibl ◽  
J. B. Huober ◽  
H. Tesch ◽  
...  

6 Background: Adjacent ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is in found in approximately 45% of invasive ductal carcinomas (IDC) of the breast. Pure DCIS overexpresses HER2 in approximately 45%. There is uncertainty whether adjacent DCIS impacts on the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and trastuzumab as well as whether HER2 expression in IDC component or adjacent DCIS changes throughout treatment. Methods: Core biopsies and surgical tissue from participants of the GeparQuattro study with HER2-positive IDC were centrally examined for the area of invasive ductal component and adjacent DCIS before and after receiving neoadjuvant anthracycline-taxane-trastuzumab containing chemotherapy. HER2 overexpression in IDC and adjacent DCIS was quantified separately by immunohistochemistry using the Ventana automated staining system. Pathological complete response (pCR) was defined as no residual invasive or non-invasive tumor tissue. Results: Fifty nine (37.3%) of 158 IDCs presented with adjacent DCIS at diagnosis. These tumors showed lower regression grades than pure IDC (p=0.033). Presence of adjacent DCIS was an independent negative predictor of pCR (odds ratio 0.42 [95% CI 0.2-0.9], p=0.027). Adjacent DCIS area decreased from pre-treatment to surgery (r=0.205) with 30 (50.8%) IDCs with adjacent DCIS showing complete eradication of adjacent DCIS. HER2 status of adjacent DCIS was highly correlated with HER2 status of IDC component before (r=0.892) and after treatment (r=0.676). Degree of HER2 overexpression of the IDC component decreased in 16 (33.3%) out of 49 patients without a pCR. These 16 IDCs showed lower RGs compared to the 33 IDCs with unchanged HER2 expression (p=0.055). Conclusions: HER2-positive IDCs with adjacent DCIS is less responsive to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and trastuzumab compared to pure IDC. However, complete eradication of adjacent DCIS is frequently observed. HER2-overexpression of the invasive ductal component decreases in a subset of tumors, which showed less tumor regression.


2011 ◽  
Vol 77 (10) ◽  
pp. 1361-1363 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lindi H. Vanderwalde ◽  
Catherine M. Dang ◽  
Catherine Bresee ◽  
Edward H. Phillips

Preoperative breast MRI does not decrease re-excision rates in patients who undergo lumpectomy. We evaluated concordance of tumor size on MRI and pathologic size in patients who underwent re-excision of margins after lumpectomy. A retrospective review of patients at the Cedars-Sinai Breast Center who received breast MRI was performed. We found that MRI was performed before lumpectomy in 136 patients. Mean age was 55.2 years (standard deviation ± 12.6). Re-excision occurred in 34 per cent (n = 46). Of those undergoing re-excision, 35 per cent (16/46) were re-excised for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) at the lumpectomy margin. There was no significant difference between radiologic and pathologic size of the tumor (1.94 vs 2.12 cm; P = 0.159). In those who underwent re-excision, the radiologic size was underestimated compared with the pathologic size (2.01 vs 2.66 cm; P = 0.032). Patients with pure DCIS lesions (n = 9) also had smaller radiologic tumor size compared with pathologic (0.64 vs 2.88 cm; P = 0.039), and this difference trended toward significance in those who underwent re-excision (0.55 vs 3.50 cm; P = 0.059). Discordance between tumor size on MRI and pathologic size may contribute to re-excisions in patients who undergo lumpectomy. The limitations of breast MRI to evaluate the extent of DCIS surrounding many breast cancers, and the impact on re-excision rates, should be further evaluated.


2019 ◽  
Vol 144 (5) ◽  
pp. 597-601 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raza S. Hoda ◽  
Edi Brogi ◽  
Jin Xu ◽  
Katia Ventura ◽  
Dara S. Ross ◽  
...  

Context.— The American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists HER2 testing guideline in breast cancer was updated in 2018 to address issues on interpretation of uncommon results using dual-probe in situ hybridization according to the 2013 guideline. Objective.— To assess impact of the 2018 guideline on breast cancer with equivocal HER2 immunohistochemistry results. Design.— We retrospectively reviewed HER2 fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) data (HER2/CEP17 ratio and average HER2 copy number per cell) of HER2 immunohistochemistry–equivocal (2+ or 1+ to 2+) breast cancers at our center between January 2014 and May 2018 and compared HER2 FISH results according to 2013 and 2018 guidelines. Results.— A total of 1666 HER2 FISH results from 1421 patients with equivocal HER2 immunohistochemistry were reviewed. Based on the 2013 guideline, HER2 FISH results were amplified in 346 cases (20.8%), equivocal in 242 (14.5%), and nonamplified in 1078 (64.7%). Using the 2018 guideline, 258 cases (16%) were reclassified, including 242 previously equivocal test results (15%) and 16 previously positive results (1%) reclassified as negative. The subset of 2013 HER2-equivocal and 2018 HER2-nonamplified cases with HER2/CEP17 ratio lower than 2.0 and average HER2 copy number 4.0 or higher and lower than 6.0 showed higher incidence of micropapillary morphology compared with HER2-amplified cases. Despite most patients in this group not receiving HER2-targeted treatment, 96% had no evidence of disease at follow-up. Conclusions.— The 2018 guideline eliminated HER2 FISH–equivocal cases by reclassifying HER2-equivocal cases and cases with nonclassical amplification without HER2 overexpression as HER2 negative. As a consequence, we observed a considerable increase in HER2 FISH–negative cases and a slight decrease in HER2 FISH–positive cases.


2004 ◽  
Vol 6 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
SB Vestey ◽  
C Sen ◽  
CJ Calder ◽  
CM Perks ◽  
M Pignatelli ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (26_suppl) ◽  
pp. 85-85
Author(s):  
Zeina Al-Mansour ◽  
Thomas Stockl ◽  
Ashraf Khan ◽  
Richard Horner ◽  
Ediz Cosar ◽  
...  

85 Background: The prognostic value of HER2 (c-ERB2) overexpression in invasive breast cancer is well known, and correlates with aggressivene behavior. HER2 overexpression was reported in 13-56% of ductal carcinoma in-situ (DCIS). The significance of HER2 overexpression in DCIS has yet to be elucidated. The aim of this study was to correlate HER2 status with known prognostic indicators of DCIS and to evaluate whether the HER2 overexpression correlates with disease recurrence. Methods: All cases of DCIS diagnosed at our institution between 2000 and 2005 were retrieved. Cases without follow-up, those treated with mastectomy or those with concurrent invasive component were excluded. Clinicopathologic data were collected, including age at time of diagnosis, size of the lesion, nuclear grade, presence of comedo necrosis, margin status, estrogen (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) status, type of adjuvant treatment received and length of follow-up. A representative block from each case was immunostained using the Hercept test. Slides were reviewed by 2 pathologists and interpreted in accordance with ASCO/CAP guidelines. Equivocal cases were reflexed for FISH testing. Results: A total of 152 cases were examined. Mean follow-up period was 77 months (range 12 to 138 months). HER2 was overexpressed in 49 cases (33%), and was significantly associated with high nuclear grade and presence of comedo necrosis. HER2-positive patients were more likely to be ER and PR negative. HER2 positive and negative patients did not differ significantly with respect to age at presentation or size of DCIS. On univariate analysis, HER2-type DCIS showed a higher risk of recurrence (P=0.037), however, this trend did not reach statistical signifance on multivariate analysis. Conclusions: HER2 overexpression was found to be associated with high nuclear grade, comedo necrosis as well as negativity for ER and PR but not with age or the size of DCIS. Patients with HER2-type DCIS (ER/PR-, HER2+) had a higher risk of disease recurrence than other types. However, after adjusting for all the other clinical variables, the molecular phenotype did not withhold its statistical significance as an independent predictor for recurrence.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document