Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction Versus Repair With Internal Bracing: Comparison of Cyclic Fatigue Mechanics

Background: Ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) injuries have increased significantly in recent years, and reconstruction has become the preferred treatment for UCL injury over ligament repair. In a recent study, UCL repair with internal bracing demonstrated significantly greater resistance to gap formation in biomechanical tests, even at low cycles of valgus loading. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose of this study was to compare the fatigue and failure mechanics of traditional UCL reconstruction with UCL repair and internal bracing. We hypothesized that repaired specimens would have less gap formation, closer return to native gap formation, and greater maximum torque to failure versus traditionally reconstructed specimens. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Ten matched pairs of cadaveric elbows were positioned at 90° of flexion and the native UCL subjected to 500 cycles of subfailure valgus loading. A simulated tear was created, and the 10 cycles were repeated. Each pair of specimens was next given repair with internal bracing on 1 side and a modified Jobe reconstruction on the contralateral side, followed by 100 manual cycles of flexion-extension, 500 cycles of valgus rotation, and, finally, rotation to failure. Results: The specimens that received the repair unexpectedly experienced significantly less gapping in the torn state than did those in the reconstruction group. At the 10th cycle, repaired UCL injuries had significantly less gap formation than the reconstructed UCLs. At the 100th and 500th cycles, repaired UCL injuries continued to experience significantly less gap formation as compared with the reconstructed injuries. Conclusion: When compared with the gold standard reconstruction technique, UCL repair with internal bracing is more resistant to gap formation under fatigue loading. However, the unexpected early difference between the torn states may have confounded this finding. Time-zero failure properties of this repair technique are on par with those of traditional reconstruction, even after 500 cycles of valgus loading. Clinical Relevance: UCL reconstruction has become a common procedure among adolescent and elite-level throwers. Recent data suggest that UCL repair may be a viable option for younger athletes with acute proximal or distal UCL tears, allowing a faster return to play.

Download Full-text

Biomechanical Comparison of Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction With a Modified Docking Technique With and Without Suture Augmentation

The American Journal of Sports Medicine ◽

10.1177/0363546518820304 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 47 (4) ◽

pp. 928-932 ◽

Cited By ~ 3

Author(s):

Jeremi Leasure ◽

Kerisimasi Reynolds ◽

Marc Thorne ◽

Rafael Escamilla ◽

Ken Akizuki

Keyword(s):

Ulnar Collateral Ligament ◽

Return To Play ◽

Reconstruction Technique ◽

Gap Formation ◽

Collateral Ligament ◽

Intact State ◽

Time Zero ◽

Load To Failure ◽

Bone Tunnels ◽

Reconstruction Group

Background: Throwing athletes with ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) injury and symptomatic valgus instability can expect to return to the same or higher level of play. Reconstruction with tendon graft is the dominant method of surgical treatment. Recent evidence suggests that spanning the joint with a suture anchored on both sides is biomechanically equivalent to reconstruction, with faster time to return to play. The authors developed a hybrid UCL reconstruction technique augmented with a suture brace to improve joint stability. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose of this study was to biomechanically evaluate a hybrid reconstruction technique and compare its performance to reconstruction without augmentation. The authors hypothesized that (1) both groups would lose stability after the simulated tear and regain stability with treatment, (2) the suture augmentation would improve stability, and (3) the addition of the suture anchors near the bone tunnels would not decrease the strength of the hybrid reconstruction. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Ten matched pairs of cadaveric arms were dissected to expose the UCL. Each elbow was mounted on a test frame at 90° of flexion. A cyclic valgus rotational torque was applied to the humerus with the UCL in its intact state and repeated in its surgically torn state. Finally, each specimen received either a hybrid reconstruction with suture brace or a reconstruction and was again put through the cyclic protocol, followed by a valgus rotation load-to-fail protocol. Results: Gap formation in the torn state for the reconstruction and hybrid reconstruction groups (0.9 ± 0.1 mm and 0.8 ± 0.1 mm, respectively) was significantly higher ( P = .009 and P = .0002) than in the intact state (0.6 ± 0.2 mm and 0.6 ± 0.3 mm, respectively). After the procedures, the hybrid group showed greater resistance to gapping ( P = .017) as compared with the reconstruction group (0.4 ± 0.2 mm and 0.6 ± 0.1 mm). During load to failure, no hybrid reconstructions failed from bone fracture or screw pullout. No statistical differences were found for failure torque ( P = .058) and stiffness ( P = .101). Gap at 10 N·m was significantly lower ( P = .014) for the hybrid reconstruction group than for the reconstruction group. Conclusion: The current study showed that hybrid reconstruction with suture bracing replicated the time-zero strength of traditional UCL reconstruction and may be more resistant to joint gapping during low cyclic load and load to failure. The combination of the bone tunnels and fixation screw holes did not appear to weaken the construct. Clinical Relevance: This study demonstrated that reconstruction with suture bracing has important time-zero stability and strength as compared with the gold standard of UCL reconstruction. This technique may be useful for throwing athletes who need UCL reconstruction.

Download Full-text

Comparison of Outcomes Based on Graft Type and Tunnel Configuration for Primary Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction in Professional Baseball Pitchers

The American Journal of Sports Medicine ◽

10.1177/0363546519831705 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 47 (5) ◽

pp. 1103-1110 ◽

Cited By ~ 7

Author(s):

Timothy B. Griffith ◽

Christopher S. Ahmad ◽

Prakash Gorroochurn ◽

John D’Angelo ◽

Michael G. Ciccotti ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Ulnar Collateral Ligament ◽

Return To Play ◽

Professional Baseball ◽

Reconstruction Technique ◽

Collateral Ligament ◽

Baseball Players ◽

Palmaris Longus ◽

Elbow Injuries ◽

Elbow Surgery ◽

Baseball Pitchers

Background: Professional baseball pitchers are at high risk for tears of the ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) of the elbow, often requiring surgical reconstruction. Despite acceptable published return-to-play outcomes, multiple techniques and graft types have been described. Purpose: This study compares UCL reconstruction (UCLR) outcomes based on tunnel configuration and graft type. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: After approval from our institutional review board and Major League Baseball (MLB), 566 professional baseball pitchers who underwent UCLR between 2010 and 2014 were identified and included. The following patient characteristics were analyzed: age, pitching role (starter vs reliever), level of play (MLB vs Minor League Baseball [MiLB]), and throwing side dominance. Surgical factors analyzed included reconstruction technique, graft type, and concomitant procedures. Primary outcome measures consisted of the ability to return to play at any level (RTP), ability to return to the same level of play (RSL), time to return, subsequent elbow injuries, and need for subsequent or revision elbow surgery. The effects of patient and surgical factors on outcomes were analyzed using multivariate linear and logistic regression modeling. Results: The RTP rate was 79.9%, and the RSL rate was 71.2%. Grafts used to reconstruct the UCL included the palmaris longus autograft (n = 361, 63.7%), the gracilis autograft (n = 135, 23.8%), and other grafts (n = 70, 12.5%). Surgical techniques utilized were the docking technique (n = 171, 30.2%), the modified Jobe technique (n = 290, 51.2%), and other techniques (n = 105, 18.6%). There were no significant differences in the time to RTP or RSL based on reconstruction technique or graft type. RTP rates were similar for the docking versus modified Jobe technique (80.1% vs 82.4%, respectively; P = .537) and for the 2 primary graft types (83.1% for palmaris longus vs 80.7% for gracilis; P = .596). The rate of subsequent elbow surgery was 10.5% for the docking technique versus 14.8% for the modified Jobe technique ( P = .203), and the rate of revision UCLR was 2.9% versus 6.2% for the docking versus modified Jobe technique, respectively ( P = .128). Significant trends toward an increasing use of the palmaris longus autograft ( P = .023) and the docking technique ( P = .006) were observed. MLB pitchers were more likely than MiLB pitchers to RTP ( P < .001) and RSL ( P < .001), but they required a longer time to return (mean difference, 35 days; P = .039) and had a higher likelihood of subsequent elbow (odds ratio [OR], 3.58 [95% CI, 2.06-6.23]; P < .001) and forearm injuries (OR, 5.70 [95% CI, 1.99-16.30]; P = .004) but not subsequent elbow surgery. No specific variables correlated with the rates of subsequent elbow surgery or revision UCLR in the multivariate analysis. The use of concomitant ulnar nerve transposition did not affect outcomes. Conclusion: Surgical outcomes in professional baseball players are not significantly influenced by UCLR technique or graft type. There was a high rate (46.3%) of subsequent throwing elbow injuries. MLB pitchers were more likely to RTP and RSL, but they had a higher frequency of subsequent elbow and forearm injuries than MiLB pitchers. Both the docking technique and the palmaris longus autograft are increasing in popularity among surgeons treating professional baseball players.

Download Full-text

Biomechanical Functional Elbow Restoration of Acute Ulnar Collateral Ligament Tears: The Role of Internal Bracing on Gap Formation and Repair Stabilization

The American Journal of Sports Medicine ◽

10.1177/0363546520921174 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 48 (8) ◽

pp. 1884-1892

Author(s):

Samuel Bachmaier ◽

Coen A. Wijdicks ◽

Nikhil N. Verma ◽

Laurence D. Higgins ◽

Stefan Greiner

Keyword(s):

Primary Repair ◽

Ulnar Collateral Ligament ◽

Analysis Of Covariance ◽

Torsional Stiffness ◽

Gap Formation ◽

Initial Stiffness ◽

Collateral Ligament ◽

Time Zero ◽

Torsional Resistance ◽

Internal Bracing

Background: Biomechanical studies have compared augmented primary repair with internal bracing versus reconstruction techniques of the anterior ulnar collateral ligament (aUCL) in the elbow. However, aUCL repair alone has not been compared with augmented repair or reconstruction techniques. Hypothesis: Internal bracing of aUCL repair provides improved time-zero stabilization in terms of gap formation, torsional stiffness, and residual torque compared with both repair alone and the modified docking technique, with enhanced valgus stability restoration to that of the native ligament. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: We randomized 8 matched pairs of cadaveric elbows to undergo either augmented aUCL repair or a modified docking technique through use of the palmaris longus tendon. Valgus laxity testing was consecutively performed at 90° of flexion on the intact, torn, and repaired conditions as well as the previously assigned techniques. First, intact elbows were loaded up to 10 N·m valgus torque to evaluate time-zero ligament rotations at valgus moments of 2.5, 5.0, 7.5, and 10 N·m. Rotation controlled cycling was performed (total 1000 cycles) for each surgical condition. Gap formation, stiffness, and residual torque were analyzed. Finally, these elbows and 8 additional intact elbows underwent torque to failure testing (30 deg/min). Results: Repair alone revealed low torsional resistance and gapping, similar to the torn state. The augmented repair technique showed significantly higher torsional stiffness ( P < .001) and residual torque ( P < .001) compared with all other conditions and restored native function. Although reconstruction revealed similar initial stiffness and residual torque compared with an intact ligament, a steady decrease of torsional resistance led to a completely loose state at higher valgus rotations. Analysis of covariance between all groups showed significantly less gap formation for augmented repair ( P < .001). The native failure load and stiffness were significantly higher and were similar to those of augmented repair ( P = .766). Conclusion: Internal bracing of aUCL repair restored valgus stability to the native state with statistically improved torsional resistance, loading capability, and gap formation compared with reconstruction, especially at the upper load range of native aUCL function in the elbow. Clinical Relevance: We found that aUCL repair with an internal brace effectively improves time-zero mechanical characteristics and may provide stabilized healing with accelerated and reliable recovery without the need for a tendon graft.

Download Full-text

Comparison of Outcomes Based on Graft Type and Tunnel Configuration for Primary Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction in Professional Baseball Pitchers

Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine ◽

10.1177/2325967118s00087 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 6 (7_suppl4) ◽

pp. 2325967118S0008

Author(s):

Timothy B. Griffith ◽

Christopher S. Ahmad ◽

Michael G. Ciccotti ◽

John D’Angelo ◽

Joshua S. Dines ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Ligament Reconstruction ◽

Ulnar Collateral Ligament ◽

Return To Play ◽

Professional Baseball ◽

Reconstruction Technique ◽

Collateral Ligament ◽

Baseball Players ◽

Elbow Surgery ◽

Baseball Pitchers ◽

Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction

Objectives: Professional baseball pitchers are at high risk for tears of the ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) of the elbow, often requiring subsequent surgical reconstruction. Despite acceptable published return to play outcomes, multiple techniques and graft types have been described. There is a paucity of clinical data in the current literature comparing UCL reconstruction surgical technique and graft type. Even less is known about the risks for subsequent injury, surgery, or revision UCL reconstruction. Accordingly, this study compares UCL reconstruction outcomes based on tunnel configuration and graft type. Methods: Following approval from our institutional review board and Major League Baseball (MLB), 566 professional baseball pitchers who underwent UCL reconstruction between 2010 and 2014 were identified and included. The following patient demographics were analyzed: age, pitching role (starter vs. reliever), level of play (MLB vs. Minor League Baseball [MiLB]), and throwing side dominance. Surgical factors analyzed included reconstruction technique (Docking vs. Modified Jobe), graft type (palmaris longus autograft vs. gracilis autograft), and concomitant procedures. Primary outcome measures consisted of: the ability to return to play at any level (RTP), to return to the same level of play (RSL), the time to return, subsequent elbow injuries, and the need for subsequent or revision elbow surgery. The impact of the patient and surgical factors on outcomes were analyzed using multivariate linear and logistic regression modeling. Results: The overall RTP was 79.9% and RSL was 71.2%. There were no significant differences in the time to RTP or RSL based on reconstruction technique or graft type. RTP rates were similar for the Docking vs. Modified Jobe techniques (80.1% vs. 82.4%; p=0.537) and for the two primary graft types (83.1% for palmaris vs. 80.7% for gracilis; p=0.596). The risk of subsequent elbow surgery was 10.5% for the Docking Technique vs. 14.8% for the Modified Jobe (p=0.203); and the risk for subsequent UCL revision reconstruction surgery was 2.9% vs. 6.2% for the Docking vs. Modified Jobe Techniques, respectively (p=0.128). Significant trends towards an increasing use of palmaris autograft (p=0.023) and the docking technique (p=0.006) were observed. MLB pitchers were more likely than MiLB pitchers to RTP (p<0.001) and to RSL (p<0.001), but they required a longer time to return (mean difference 35 days; p=0.039), had a higher likelihood of subsequent elbow (OR 3.58; 95% CI 2.055 to 6.231; p<0.001) and forearm injuries (OR 5.695; 95% CI 1.99 to 16.302; p=0.004), but not subsequent elbow surgery. No specific variables were noted to be predictive of subsequent elbow or revision surgery in the multivariate analysis. Conclusion: Surgical outcomes in professional baseball players are not significantly influenced by ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction technique or graft type usage. Major League players are more likely to RTP and RSL, but they have a higher frequency of subsequent elbow and forearm injuries. Both the Docking Technique and palmaris autograft are increasing in popularity amongst surgeons treating professional baseball players.

Download Full-text

Reconstruction of the Medial Ulnar Collateral Ligament of the Elbow: The Docking Technique

Video Journal of Sports Medicine ◽

10.1177/2635025421994110 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 1 (1) ◽

pp. 263502542199411

Author(s):

Christopher L. Camp ◽

Bryant M. Song ◽

Ryan R. Wilbur

Keyword(s):

Ulnar Collateral Ligament ◽

Nonoperative Treatment ◽

Medial Epicondyle ◽

Return To Play ◽

Reconstruction Technique ◽

Complication Rates ◽

Collateral Ligament ◽

Length Determination ◽

Repetitive Stress ◽

Throwing Motion

Background: The medial ulnar collateral ligament (MUCL) is the primary restraint to valgus force on the elbow. Since the first description of MUCL reconstruction by Jobe et al in 1986, many technical advancements have been implemented to improve outcomes and reduce complications. The docking technique has emerged as one of the most commonly used techniques. Indications: Following repetitive stress on the elbow during the overhead throwing motion, the MUCL may become attenuated, insufficient, or rupture completely. Although nonoperative treatment with rest and therapy is often the initial treatment of choice, individuals who fail conservative measures may require MUCL reconstruction. Technique Description: The major steps of the procedure are (1) harvesting of palmaris longus autograft, (2) incision and exposure, (3) preparation of ulnar tunnel, (4) preparation of docking site on medial epicondyle, (5) graft passage, (6) graft tensioning and length determination, (7) final fixation, and (8) closure. Results: This procedure allows for reconstruction of the MUCL, restoration of valgus stability to the elbow, and return to play rates of 80% to 95%. The docking technique has advantages over previously described MUCL reconstruction techniques in that it minimizes injury to the flexor pronator mass, avoids the ulnar nerve, allows for robust graft tensioning, and reduces the amount of bone removed from the medial epicondyle. Discussion/Conclusion: The docking technique, as described in this video demonstration, is the most common MUCL reconstruction technique used today. When precise surgical steps are followed, complication rates are low and patient outcomes are favorable.

Download Full-text

Treatment of Ulnar Collateral Ligament Tears of the Elbow

Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine ◽

10.1177/2325967116682211 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 5 (1) ◽

pp. 232596711668221 ◽

Cited By ~ 15

Author(s):

Brandon J. Erickson ◽

Bernard R. Bach ◽

Nikhil N. Verma ◽

Charles A. Bush-Joseph ◽

Anthony A. Romeo

Keyword(s):

Systematic Review ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Return To Sport ◽

Ulnar Collateral Ligament ◽

Treatment Method ◽

Gap Formation ◽

Collateral Ligament ◽

Level Of Evidence ◽

Internal Bracing ◽

Repair Techniques

Background: Ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) tears have become common, and UCL reconstruction (UCLR) is currently the preferred surgical treatment method for treating UCL tears. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose of this study was to review the literature surrounding UCL repair and determine the viability of new repair techniques for treatment of UCL tears. We hypothesized that UCL repair techniques will provide comparable results to UCLR for treatment of UCL tears. Study Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: A systematic review was registered with PROSPERO and performed with PRISMA guidelines using 3 publicly available free databases. Biomechanical and clinical outcome investigations reporting on UCL repair with levels of evidence 1 through 4 were eligible for inclusion. Descriptive statistics were calculated for each study and parameter/variable analyzed. Results: Of the 46 studies eligible, 4 studies (3 clinical and 1 biomechanical) were included. There were 92 patients (n = 92 elbows; 61 males [62.3%]; mean age, 21.9 ± 4.7 years) included in the clinical studies, with a mean follow-up of 49 ± 14.4 months. Eighty-six percent of repairs performed were on the dominant elbow, and 38% were in college athletes. Most UCL repairs (66.3%) were performed via suture anchors. After UCL repair, 87.0% of patients were able to return to sport. Overall, 94.9% of patients scored excellent/good on the Andrews-Carson score. Patients who were able to return to sport after UCL repair did so within 6 months after surgery. Biomechanically, when UCL repair was compared with the modified Jobe technique, the repair group showed significantly less gap formation than the reconstruction group. Conclusion: In patients for whom repair is properly indicated, UCL repair provides similar return-to-sport rates and clinical outcomes with shorter return-to-sport timing after repair compared with UCL reconstruction. Future outcome studies evaluating UCL repair with internal bracing are necessary before recommending this technique.

Download Full-text

Reconstruction of the Medial Ulnar Collateral Ligament of the Elbow: Biomechanical Comparison of a Novel Anatomic Technique to the Docking Technique

Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine ◽

10.1177/2325967119857592 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 7 (7) ◽

pp. 232596711985759 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Christopher L. Camp ◽

Christopher Bernard ◽

Bill Benavitz ◽

John Konicek ◽

David W. Altchek ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Ultimate Load ◽

Biomechanical Testing ◽

Ulnar Collateral Ligament ◽

Return To Play ◽

Reconstruction Technique ◽

The Novel ◽

Collateral Ligament ◽

Initial Strength ◽

Load To Failure ◽

Fresh Frozen

Background: In recent years, understanding of the anatomy of the ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) has evolved, demonstrating that the insertional footprint of the UCL on the ulna is more elongated and distally tapered than previously described. Current UCL reconstruction configurations do not typically re-create this native anatomy, which may represent a potential area for improvement. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purposes of this study were (1) to describe a novel anatomic UCL reconstruction technique designed to better replicate the native UCL anatomy and (2) to biomechanically compare this with the docking technique. The hypothesis was that the ultimate load to failure for the anatomic technique would not be inferior to the docking technique. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: A total of 16 fresh-frozen cadaveric upper extremities (8 matched pairs) were utilized. One elbow in each pair was randomized to receive UCL reconstruction via the docking technique or the novel anatomic UCL reconstruction technique with palmaris tendon autograft. Following reconstruction, biomechanical testing was performed by applying valgus rotational torque at a constant rate of 5 deg/s until ultimate mechanical failure of the construct occurred. Maximal torque (N·m), rotation stiffness (N·m/deg), and mode/location of failure were recorded for each specimen. Results: The mean ultimate load to failure for elbows in the docking technique group was 23.8 ± 6.1 N·m, as compared with 31.9 ± 8.4 N·m in the anatomic technique group ( P = .045). Mean rotational stiffness was 1.9 ± 0.7 versus 2.3 ± 0.9 N·m/deg for the docking and anatomic groups, respectively ( P = .338). The most common mode of failure was suture pullout from the graft, which occurred in all 8 (100%) docking technique specimens and 7 of 8 (88%) specimens that underwent the anatomic UCL reconstruction technique. Conclusion: Ultimately, the anatomic UCL reconstruction technique demonstrated superior strength and resistance to valgus torque when compared with the docking technique, and this was comparable with that of the native UCL from prior studies. Increased initial strength may allow for earlier initiation of throwing postoperatively and potentially shorten return-to-play times. Clinical Relevance: Current UCL reconstruction techniques do not accurately reproduce the UCL insertional anatomy on the ulna. The novel anatomic technique described may result in more natural joint kinematics. This study demonstrated load-to-failure rates that are significantly higher than with the docking technique and consistent with the native ligament, as reported from previous studies. These findings may serve as a foundation for future clinical study and optimization of this technique.

Download Full-text

Trends in Patient, Physician, and Public Perception of Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction Using Social Media Analytics

Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine ◽

10.1177/2325967121990052 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 9 (3) ◽

pp. 232596712199005

Author(s):

Jonathan S. Yu ◽

James B. Carr ◽

Jacob Thomas ◽

Julianna Kostas ◽

Zhaorui Wang ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Social Media ◽

Public Perception ◽

Ulnar Collateral Ligament ◽

Return To Play ◽

Social Media Analytics ◽

Care Providers ◽

Collateral Ligament ◽

The Past ◽

Positive Sentiment ◽

Negative Sentiment

Background: Social media posts regarding ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) injuries and reconstruction surgeries have increased in recent years. Purpose: To analyze posts shared on Instagram and Twitter referencing UCL injuries and reconstruction surgeries to evaluate public perception and any trends in perception over the past 3 years. Study Design: Cross-sectional study. Methods: A search of a 3-year period (August 2016 and August 2019) of public Instagram and Twitter posts was performed. We searched for >22 hashtags and search terms, including #TommyJohn, #TommyJohnSurgery, and #tornUCL. A categorical classification system was used to assess the sentiment, media format, perspective, timing, accuracy, and general content of each post. Post popularity was measured by number of likes and comments. Results: A total of 3119 Instagram posts and 267 Twitter posts were included in the analysis. Of the 3119 Instagram posts analyzed, 34% were from patients, and 28% were from providers. Of the 267 Twitter posts analyzed, 42% were from patients, and 16% were from providers. Although the majority of social media posts were of a positive sentiment, over the past 3 years, there was a major surge in negative sentiment posts (97% increase) versus positive sentiment posts (9% increase). Patients were more likely to focus their posts on rehabilitation, return to play, and activities of daily living. Providers tended to focus their posts on education, rehabilitation, and injury prevention. Patient posts declined over the past 3 years (–28%), whereas provider posts increased substantially (110%). Of posts shared by health care providers, 4% of posts contained inaccurate or misleading information. Conclusion: The majority of patients who post about their UCL injury and reconstruction on social media have a positive sentiment when discussing their procedure. However, negative sentiment posts have increased significantly over the past 3 years. Patient content revolves around rehabilitation and return to play. Although patient posts have declined over the past 3 years, provider posts have increased substantially with an emphasis on education.

Download Full-text

Effect of Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction on Pitch Accuracy, Velocity, and Movement in Major League Baseball Pitchers

Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine ◽

10.1177/2325967120968530 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 8 (12) ◽

pp. 232596712096853

Author(s):

Braden McKnight ◽

Nathanael D. Heckmann ◽

Xiao T. Chen ◽

Kevork Hindoyan ◽

J. Ryan Hill ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Repeated Measures ◽

Major League Baseball ◽

Ulnar Collateral Ligament ◽

Poor Performance ◽

Return To Play ◽

Collateral Ligament ◽

Level Of Evidence ◽

Major League ◽

The Mean ◽

Performance Statistics

Background: Ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) reconstruction is frequently performed on Major League Baseball (MLB) pitchers. Previous studies have investigated the effects of UCL reconstruction on fastball and curveball velocity, but no study to date has evaluated its effect on fastball accuracy or curveball movement among MLB pitchers. Purpose/Hypothesis: The primary purpose of this study was to determine the effects of UCL reconstruction on fastball accuracy, fastball velocity, and curveball movement in MLB pitchers. Our hypothesis was that MLB pitchers who underwent UCL reconstruction would return to their presurgery fastball velocity, fastball accuracy, and curveball movement. The secondary purpose of this study was to determine which factors, if any, were predictive of poor performance after UCL reconstruction. Study Design: Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: MLB pitchers who underwent UCL reconstruction surgery between 2011 and 2012 were identified. Performance data including fastball velocity, fastball accuracy, and curveball movement were evaluated 1 year preoperatively and up to 3 years of play postoperatively. A repeated-measures analysis of variance with a Tukey-Kramer post hoc test was used to determine statistically significant changes in performance over time. Characteristic factors and presurgery performance statistics were compared between poor performers (>20% decrease in fastball accuracy) and non—poor performers. Results: We identified 56 pitchers with a total of 230,995 individual pitches for this study. After exclusion for lack of return to play (n = 14) and revision surgery (n = 3), 39 pitchers were included in the final analysis. The mean presurgery fastball pitch-to-target distance was 32.9 cm. There was a statistically significant decrease in fastball accuracy after reconstruction, which was present up to 3 years postoperatively ( P = .007). The mean presurgery fastball velocity of 91.82 mph did not significantly change after surgery ( P = .194). The mean presurgery curveball movement of 34.49 cm vertically and 5.89 cm horizontally also did not change significantly ( P = .937 and .161, respectively). Conclusion: Fastball accuracy among MLB pitchers significantly decreased after UCL reconstruction for up to 3 years postoperatively. There were no statistically significant differences in characteristic factors or presurgery performance statistics between poor and non--poor performers.

Download Full-text

Comparative Analysis of the Nonoperative Treatment of Elbow Ulnar Collateral Ligament Injuries in Professional Baseball Players with and without Platelet-Rich Plasma

Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine ◽

10.1177/2325967118s00086 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 6 (7_suppl4) ◽

pp. 2325967118S0008 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Peter Douglas McQueen ◽

Christopher L. Camp ◽

Aakash Chauhan ◽

Brandon J. Erickson ◽

Hollis G. Potter ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Recovery Time ◽

Platelet Rich Plasma ◽

Ulnar Collateral Ligament ◽

Nonoperative Treatment ◽

Return To Play ◽

Professional Baseball ◽

Collateral Ligament ◽

Baseball Players ◽

Minor League Baseball ◽

Minor League

Objectives: In the setting of ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) injury, surgical reconstruction of the UCL is not always selected, as it leads to a prolonged recovery time and return to play rates between 67-95%. To date, there is limited data on outcomes following nonoperative treatment in this population. Orthobiologics, such as platelet-rich plasma (PRP), have recently been used as an adjunct therapy for standard nonoperative treatment including rest and physical therapy for UCL injuries. The objective of this study was to determine if the addition of PRP injections in professional baseball players with UCL injuries reduces recovery time, lowers the likelihood of surgery, and increases the return to play rate compared to traditional nonoperative treatment. Methods: The Health and Injury Tracking System (HITS) database was searched from 2011-2015 for Major and Minor league baseball players with Grade I, II or III UCL injuries. Standard demographic, injury, and return to play data was obtained for all players. MRI’s for 353 athletes were reviewed by a musculoskeletal radiologist and graded accordingly. Outcomes were compared between players who received PRP injections in addition to traditional nonoperative treatment (PRP group) and players who received traditional nonoperative treatment alone (No PRP group). Statistical analysis was performed using Student’s T-test and Chi-square for parametric data. Kaplan Meier’s analysis was used for estimating longevity of the treatment. Results: A total of 544 Major and Minor League Baseball players with UCL tears underwent an initial course of nonoperative treatment (active rest & rehabilitation) for their injury between 2011-2015. Of these, 133 underwent PRP injections plus rehab and 411 underwent rehab alone. There was a significantly higher proportion of Major League Baseball players in the PRP group compared to the No PRP group (25.6% vs 9.0%, P<0.001). There was no difference between the two cohorts in regard to the grade of UCL tear (Figure 1). The players in the PRP group had a significantly longer time before returning to a throwing program compared to the No PRP group (64 days vs 51 days, P<0.001). The mean time from injury date to PRP injection was 14.5 days, which may explain the difference in time to return to throwing. The return to play rate in a live game without surgery was significantly lower in the PRP group compared to the No PRP group (46% vs 57%, P=0.03). There was no difference in the proportion of athletes requiring UCL reconstruction (58% vs 51%) or the time to surgery (154 days vs 178 days) between the two groups. Kaplan Meier survivor analysis showed no difference between the PRP and No PRP groups with regard to longevity of the native UCL (Figure 2). Conclusion: Among Major and Minor League Baseball players who were treated nonoperatively for a UCL injury between 2011-2015, 24% underwent PRP injections prior to rehab. Compared to traditional nonoperative rehab alone program, players who received PRP injections experienced a significantly longer time before returning to throwing, which may be in part due to the delay between the injury date and PRP injection. PRP injections did not appear to have a significant effect on the likelihood of surgical intervention.

Download Full-text