scholarly journals Open Reduction Internal Fixation of Posterior Malleolus Fractures via a Posteromedial Approach

2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 2473011417S0004
Author(s):  
Robert Zbeda ◽  
Lon Weiner ◽  
Stuart Katchis ◽  
Steven Friedel

Category: Ankle, Trauma Introduction/Purpose: Ankle fractures with a posterior malleolus component are complex injuries to manage. Due to the heterogeneous morphology of these fractures and lack of high-quality evidence, methods of surgical fixation are controversial and highly variable. The most commonly used surgical methods include indirect reduction via a percutaneous anterior approach or direct reduction via a posterolateral approach. For large posterior malleolus fractures with medial extension, direct reduction via a posteromedial approach is an alternative surgical option. The purpose of this study was to report on a large series of posterior malleolus fractures treated via a novel posteromedial approach. The study hypothesized that fixation of large posterior malleolus fractures with medial extension via a posteromedial approach results in anatomic reduction and stable plate fixation. Methods: From 2008 to 2015, 23 of 244 (9.4%) consecutive operative ankle fractures were identified as posterior malleolus fractures treated using a posteromedial approach (Figure 1). All patients had pre-operative computed tomography scans to confirm the presence of a posterior malleolus fracture with medial extension (Figure 2-4). A posteromedial incision was made and fracture was reduced with the saphenous vein retracted anteriorly and the posterior tibial tendon retracted posteriorly. Patient charts were retrospectively reviewed for demographics, injury history, surgical details, follow-up time, and any post-operative complications. Post-operative radiographs were reviewed to ensure that anatomic reduction and stable fixation was maintained (Figure 5). Results: 73.9% (17/23) of the patients were female and the average age at the time of surgery was 54.6 years (range, 26-86 years). There were no open fractures, but 8/23 (34.7%) patients required external fixation prior to open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) for soft tissue management. The average follow-up time was 11.0 months (range, 0.3 to 41.4 months). All patients healed completely on a clinical and radiographic basis. Anatomic reduction and stable plate fixation was obtained intra-operatively in all patients and maintained at maximal follow-up. Eight (34.7%) patients underwent removal of hardware. There was a 13.0% (3/23) post-operative complication rate: 1 patient had cellulitis, 1 patient had osteomyelitis involving the fibula, and 1 patient had symptomatic heterotopic ossification. All complications resolved with appropriate management. Conclusion: ORIF of posterior malleolus fractures via a posteromedial approach achieved anatomic reduction, stable plate fixation, and complete healing in all patients. Posteromedial approach enables direct visualization and anatomic reduction of large posterior malleolus fractures. Fixation of the posteromedial tibial plafond is important because, unlike the posterolateral aspect, there are no ligamentous insertions that can provisionally reduce the fracture fragment by ligamentotaxis. In concurrence with previous literature, our study demonstrates that posteromedial approach is a reasonable alternative to other more commonly used methods for treating these fractures.

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Andreja Gavrilovski ◽  
Aleksandra Gavrilovska-Dimovska ◽  
Goran Aleksovski

Fractures of the talus do not occur frequently, accounting for about 0.1% of all fractures. Failure to achieve anatomic reduction, exponentially increases the risk of postoperative aseptic osteonecrosis and posttraumatic osteoarthritis. The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the short-term and medium-term functional outcomes in patients who underwent open reduction and internal fixation of talus fractures. Materials and methods: At the University Clinic for Traumatology in the period between 2017 to 2020, 14 patients with talus fractures were surgically treated. The inclusion and exclusion factors were determined, all patients signed the consent and the study passed the ethics committee. Results: All patients underwent open reduction and internal fixation with screws or reconstructive plate. Follow-up was done on the 14th postoperative day, 1st month, 3rd month and 6th month. At the 6th month follow-up, the functional outcome was tested using the Kitaoka score unified by the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society. This injury is too rare for conclusions to be brought out of and to be compared to larger studies. However, all major studies from reference trauma centers lead to the same conclusions, that the treatment of these fractures is complex Anatomical reduction is mandatory for a better outcome. Conclusion: A protocol for the treatment of posttraumatic osteoarthritis should be introduced, given the high rate of its occurrence despite the satisfactory surgical technique.


2018 ◽  
Vol 39 (9) ◽  
pp. 1089-1096 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matteo Buda ◽  
Shaun Kink ◽  
Ruben Stavenuiter ◽  
Catharina Noortje Hagemeijer ◽  
Bonnie Chien ◽  
...  

Background: Controversy persists as to whether Lisfranc injuries are best treated with open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) versus primary arthrodesis (PA). Reoperation rates certainly influence this debate, but prior studies are often confounded by inclusion of hardware removal as a complication rather than as a planned, staged procedure inherent to ORIF. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate whether reoperation rates, excluding planned hardware removal, differ between ORIF and PA. A secondary aim was to evaluate patient risk factors associated with reoperation after operative treatment of Lisfranc injuries. Methods: Between July 1991 and July 2016, adult patients who sustained closed, isolated Lisfranc injuries with or without fractures and who underwent ORIF or PA with a minimum follow-up of 12 months were analyzed. Reoperation rates for reasons other than planned hardware removal were examined, as were patient risk factors predictive of reoperation. Two hundred seventeen patients met enrollment criteria (mean follow-up, 62.5 ± 43.1 months; range, 12-184), of which 163 (75.1%) underwent ORIF and 54 (24.9%) underwent PA. Results: Overall and including planned procedures, patients treated with ORIF had a significantly higher rate of return to the operation room (75.5%) as compared to those in the PA group (31.5%, P < .001). When excluding planned hardware removal, however, there was no difference in reoperation rates between the 2 groups (29.5% in the ORIF group and 29.6% in the PA group, P = 1). Risk factors correlating with unplanned return to the operation room included deep infection ( P = .009-.001), delayed wound healing ( P = .008), and high-energy trauma ( P = .01). Conclusion: When excluding planned removal of hardware, patients with Lisfranc injuries treated with ORIF did not demonstrate a higher rate of reoperation compared with those undergoing PA. Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective comparative study


2015 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 288-289
Author(s):  
Ju-zheng Hu ◽  
Zhan-ying Shi ◽  
Jing-li Tang ◽  
Cheng-ming Zhu

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 2473011419S0005
Author(s):  
Azeem Tariq Malik ◽  
Safdar N. Khan ◽  
Laura Phieffer ◽  
Thuan V. Ly ◽  
Carmen E. Quatman

Category: Ankle, Trauma Introduction/Purpose: Tri-malleolar fractures, as compared to simple uni-malleolar fractures, are technically more challenging cases, have longer operative times and require a higher effort. The current RVU-based system is built to reflect the varying presentation of ankle fractures (uni-malleolar vs. bi-malleolar vs. tri-malleolar) by assigning individual RVUs to different fracture complexities. However, no study has evaluated whether the current RVUs reflect an appropriate compensation per unit time following open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) for uni-malleolar vs. bi-malleolar vs. tri-malleolar ankle fractures. Methods: The 2012-2017 American College of Surgeons – National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) files were queried using CPT codes for patients undergoing open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) for uni-malleolar (CPT-27766, CPT- 27769, CPT-27792), bi-malleolar (CPT-27814) and tri-malleolar (CPT-27822, CPT-27823) ankle fractures. A total of 7,830 (37.2%) uni-malleolar, 7,826 (37.2%) bi-malleolar and 5,391 (25.6%) tri-malleolar ankle fractures were retrieved. Total RVUs were calculated for each case. Mean RVU/minute was derived by dividing the total RVU of each case by the total operative time. Reimbursement rate ($/min) was calculated by multiplying the mean RVU/min of each procedure by a preset CMS-defined rate of $35.8887/RVU. Mean Reimbursement/case was calculated by multiplying the reimbursement rate by the operative time of each procedure. Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to compare RVUs, operative time and reimbursements between the three fracture groups. Results: The mean total RVU for each fracture type was as follows:- 1) Uni-malleolar: 9.99, 2) Bi-malleolar=11.71 and 3) Tri- malleolar=12.87 (p<0.001). A statistically significant difference was noted in mean operative time (uni-malleolar=63.2 vs. bi- malleolar=78.6 vs. tri-malleolar=95.5; p<0.001) between the two groups. Reimbursement rates ($/min) decreased significantly as fracture complexity increased (uni-malleolar=$7.21/min vs. bi-malleolar=$6.75/min vs. tri-malleolar=$6.10; p<0.001). The average reimbursement/case was $358, $420 and $462 for uni-malleolar, bi-malleolar and tri-malleolar fractures respectively. Based on a hypothetical scenario, an orthopaedic surgeon spent 190 minutes fixing two tri-malleolar fractures and earning $924 in the process. Within a total operative time of 190 minutes, three uni-malleolar ankle fractures and two bi-malleolar ankle fractures could be managed completely with an associated earning of $1,074 and $840 respectively. Conclusion: Orthopaedic surgeons are reimbursed at a higher rate ($/min) for treating a simple uni-malleolar fracture as compared to bi-malleolar and tri-malleolar fractures, despite the higher complexity and longer operative times seen in the latter. The study highlights the need of a change in the RVUs for bi-malleolar and tri-malleolar ankle fractures to ensure that surgeons are adequately reimbursed per unit time for treating a more complex fracture case.


2021 ◽  
pp. 175857322110654
Author(s):  
E. Fleischhacker ◽  
G. Siebenbürger ◽  
J. Gleich ◽  
T. Helfen ◽  
W. Böcker ◽  
...  

Background Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of humeral head split fractures is challenging because of high instability and limited visibility. The aim of this retrospective study was to investigate the extend of the approach through the rotator interval (RI) on the reduction quality and functional outcome. Methods 37 patients (mean age: 59  ±  16 years,16 female) treated by ORIF through a standard deltopectoral (DP) approach were evaluated. The follow-up period was at least two years. In 17 cases, the approach was extended through the RI. Evaluation was based on radiographs, Constant scores (CS) and DASH scores. Results In group DP, “anatomic” reduction was achieved in 9 cases (45%), “acceptable” in 5 cases (25%), and “malreduced” in 6 cases (30%). In group RI, “anatomic” reduction was seen in 12 cases (71%), “acceptable” in 5 cases (29%), and “malreduced” in none (p  =  0.04). In the DP group, the CS was 60.2  ±  16.2 and the %CS was 63.9  ±  22.3, while in the RI group, the CS was 74.5  ±  17.4 and the %CS was 79.1  ±  24.1 (p  =  0.07, p  =  0.08). DASH score was 22.8  ±  19.5 in DP compared to RI: 25.2  ±  20.6 (p  =  0.53). Conclusions The RI approach improves visualization as it enhances quality of fracture reduction, however functional outcomes may not differ significantly. Type of study and level of proof Retrospective, level III


2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 2473011417S0003
Author(s):  
Direk Tantigate ◽  
J. Turner Vosseller ◽  
Justin Greisberg ◽  
Benjamin Ascherman ◽  
Christina Freibott ◽  
...  

Category: Ankle, Trauma Introduction/Purpose: Unstable ankle fractures are typically treated with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) for stabilization in an effort to ultimately prevent post-traumatic arthritis. It is not uncommon for operative treatment to be performed as an outpatient in the ambulatory surgery setting several days to a couple weeks after the injury to facilitate things from a scheduling perspective. It is unclear what effect this delay has on functional outcome. The purpose of this study is to assess the impact of delayed operative treatment by comparing the functional outcomes for groups of patients based on the amount of time between the injury and surgery. Methods: A retrospective chart review of 122 ankle fracture patients who were surgically treated by ORIF over a three year period was performed. All ankle fracture patients older than 18 years with a minimum of 24 months of follow-up were included. A total of 61 patients were included for this study. Three patients were excluded; 2 patients had an open injury and 1 patient presented with a delayed union. Demographic data, comorbidities, injury characteristics, duration from injury to surgery, operative time, length of postoperative stay, complications and functional outcomes were recorded. Functional outcome was determined by Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS) at the latest follow-up visit. Comparison of demographic variables and the subcategory of FAOS including symptoms, pain, activities of daily living (ADL), sport activity and quality of life (QOL) was performed between patient underwent ORIF less than 14 days after injury and 14 days or greater. Results: A total of 58 patients were included in this study. Thirty-six patients (62.1%) were female. The mean age of patients was 48.14 ± 16.84 years (19-84 years). The mean follow-up time was 41.48 ± 12.25 months (24-76 months). The duration between injury and operative fixation in the two groups was 7 ± 3 days (<14 days) and 18 ± 3 days (>14 days), respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in demographic variables, comorbidities, injury characteristics, or length of operation. Each subcategory of FAOS demonstrated no statistically significant difference between these two groups. (Table 1) Additionally, further analysis for the delayed fixation more than 7 days and 10 days also revealed no significant difference of FAOS. Conclusion: Open reduction and internal fixation of ankle fracture more than 14 days does not significantly diminish functional outcome according to FAOS. Delay of ORIF for ankle fractures does not play a significant role in the long-term functional outcome.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document