Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in pediatric patients belongs predominantly to the germinal-center type B-cell lymphomas: a clinicopathologic analysis of cases included in the German BFM (Berlin-Frankfurt-Münster) Multicenter Trial

Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 107 (10) ◽  
pp. 4047-4052 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ilske Oschlies ◽  
Wolfram Klapper ◽  
Martin Zimmermann ◽  
Matthias Krams ◽  
Hans-Heinrich Wacker ◽  
...  

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) in adults is a heterogeneous disease. Biologic subgroups of DLBCL with a favorable prognosis (germinal center B-cell–like, GCB) and with a poor prognosis (activated B-cell–like, ABC) have been defined by gene expression profiling and can be distinguished by immunohistochemistry. In contrast to their adult counterparts, children with DLBCL have an excellent prognosis. We analyzed 63 cases of DLBCL in pediatric patients by immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and found a striking predominance of a GCB subtype, which might explain the good clinical outcome in these lymphomas. Interestingly, FISH applied to 50 of these cases, as well as conventional cytogenetics available in 3 cases, revealed absence of the translocation t(14;18) involving the BCL2 gene, which is present in about 15% of adult GCB subtype DLBCL. Our data indicate that pediatric DLBCL differs from adult DLBCL and might comprise a biologically unique subgroup of DLBCL from which important insights into the pathogenesis and biology of this disease might be gained.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (31) ◽  
pp. 3538-3546 ◽  
Author(s):  
John P. Leonard ◽  
Kathryn S. Kolibaba ◽  
James A. Reeves ◽  
Anil Tulpule ◽  
Ian W. Flinn ◽  
...  

Purpose To evaluate the impact of the addition of bortezomib to rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) on outcomes in previously untreated patients with non–germinal center B-cell–like (non-GCB) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Patients and Methods After real-time determination of non-GCB DLBCL using the Hans immunohistochemistry algorithm, 206 patients were randomly assigned (1:1; stratified by International Prognostic Index [IPI] score) to six 21-day cycles of standard R-CHOP alone or R-CHOP plus bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2 intravenously on days 1 and 4 (VR-CHOP). The primary end point, progression-free survival (PFS), was evaluated in 183 patients with centrally confirmed non-GCB DLBCL who received one or more doses of study drug (91 R-CHOP, 92 VR-CHOP). Results After a median follow-up of 34 months, with 25% (R-CHOP) and 18% (VR-CHOP) of patients having had PFS events, the hazard ratio (HR) for PFS was 0.73 (90% CI, 0.43 to 1.24) with VR-CHOP ( P = .611). Two-year PFS rates were 77.6% with R-CHOP and 82.0% with VR-CHOP; they were 65.1% versus 72.4% in patients with high-intermediate/high IPI (HR, 0.67; 90% CI, 0.34 to 1.29), and 90.0% versus 88.9% (HR, 0.85; 90% CI, 0.35 to 2.10) in patients with low/low-intermediate IPI. Overall response rate with R-CHOP and VR-CHOP was 98% and 96%, respectively. The overall survival HR was 0.75 (90% CI, 0.38 to 1.45); 2-year survival rates were 88.4% and 93.0%, respectively. In the safety population (100 R-CHOP and 101 VR-CHOP patients), grade ≥ 3 adverse events included neutropenia (53% v 49%), thrombocytopenia (13% v 29%), anemia (7% v 15%), leukopenia (26% v 25%), and neuropathy (1% v 5%). Conclusion Outcomes for newly diagnosed, prospectively enrolled patients with non-GCB DLBCL were more favorable than expected with R-CHOP and were not significantly improved by adding bortezomib.


2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 18531-18531
Author(s):  
W. Kim ◽  
Y. Oh ◽  
C. Park

18531 Background: Diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) can be subdivided into germinal center B cell-like (GCB) and non- germinal center B cell-like (Non-GC) types by immunohistochemical profiling. Previous studies showed better survival rate for the GCB groups. CD44 is necessary for tumor spread and metastasis and its expression is generally associated with unfavorable prognosis. We analyzed the expression and prognostic significance of standard isoform CD44s and its variant isoform CD44v6 in DLBCL types. Methods: Tissue microarray blocks were created from 52 nodal DLBCL with control tissue. Immunohistochemical staining for CD10, Bcl-6, MUM-1, CD44s, and CD44v6 were performed. The median follow-up period was 44 months. Results: Nodal DLBCLs were subclassified into GCB [CD10+ or CD10-/Bcl6+/MUM1+, n=17 (33%)] and non-GC subgroups [CD10-/Bcl6- or CD10-/Bcl6+/MUM1+, n=35 (67%)]. CD44s expression appeared more on non-GC cases of DLBCL (p=0.04). CD44s and CD44v6 did not result in any difference according to tumor stage, IPI scores, LDH levels. Upon survival analysis, CD44s and CD44v6 expression did not show any statistical correlation. Conclusions: CD44s expression may play a role during lymphomatogenesis of non-GC type DLBCL. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document