Predictive factors of endometriosis progression into ovarian cancer

Background In recent years, the endometriosis has overcome a noteworthy renaissance in the recognition of its potential. In certain patients, a demonstrable malignant progression of ectopic foci leading to development of ovarian cancer is seen. The knowledge of endometriosis overthrow background into endometriosis associated ovarian cancer is of paramount importance for selection of patients at risk. The goal of the presented study was to review a malignant potential of the endometriosis and to specify predictive factors of endometriosis progression into ovarian cancer. Altogether 189 patients were included in the study. Conventional cytogenetics as well as measurement of transcriptional activity of CTNNB1 (β-catenin) and HIF1A (HIF1-α) genes were prospectively studied in 60 endometriosis patients and 50 control group patients. The retrospective histopathological analysis was performed in 19 endometriosis associated ovarian cancer patients and 60 patients with histologically confirmed endometriosis. Results Five endometriosis patients showed a deviation from normal cytogenetics finding without affecting of their phenotype. In 6 cases of endometriosis associated ovarian cancer ectopic endometrium was not confirmed. The remaining 13 cases demonstrated either benign or atypical endometriosis or even structures of borderline carcinoma. Atypical endometriosis was histologically confirmed in 20% of 60 endometriosis patients. Determination of gene expression (CTNNB1, HIF1A) formed two subgroups. Transcriptionally incipient endometriosis subgroup with insignificant genes expression compared to control group. In transcriptionally evident endometriosis subgroup were genes expressions significantly higher compared to control group (p < 0.01) as well as transcriptionally incipient endometriosis subgroup (p < 0.05). Conclusions Significant structural abnormalities of chromosomes are not included in genetic rigging of endometriosis patients. Atypical endometriosis represents a histopathologically detectable intermediate of endometriosis progression. Determination of genes expression CTNNB1 and HIF1A helps to allocate risk patients with endometriosis where more precise management is needed.

PLAG1 Immunohistochemical Staining Is a Surrogate Marker for PLAG1 Fusions in Lipoblastomas

Background The hallmark of lipoblastoma is a PLAG1 fusion. PLAG1 protein overexpression has been reported in sporadic PLAG1-rearranged lipoblastomas. Methods We evaluated the utility of PLAG1 immunohistochemical staining (IHC) in 34 pediatric lipomatous tumors, correlating the results with histology and conventional cytogenetics, FISH and/or next generation sequencing (NGS) results. Results The study included 24 lipoblastomas, divided into 2 groups designated as “Lipoblastoma 1” with both lipoblastoma histology and PLAG1 rearrangement (n = 16) and “Lipoblastoma 2” with lipoblastoma histology but without PLAG1 cytogenetic rearrangement (n = 8), and 10 lipomas with neither lipoblastoma histology nor a PLAG1 rearrangement. Using the presence of a fusion as the “gold standard” for diagnosing lipoblastoma (Lipoblastoma 1), the sensitivity of PLAG1 IHC was 94%. Using histologic features alone (Lipoblastoma 1 + 2), the sensitivity was 96%. Specificity, as defined by the ability to distinguish lipoma from lipoblastoma, was 100%, as there were no false positives in the lipoma group. Conclusions Cytogenetics/molecular testing is expensive and may not be ideal for detecting PLAG1 fusions because PLAG1 fusions are often cytogenetically cryptic and NGS panels may not include all partner genes. PLAG1 IHC is an inexpensive surrogate marker of PLAG1 fusions and may be useful in distinguishing lipoblastomas from lipomas.

Next Generation Cytogenetics in Myeloid Hematological Neoplasms: Detection of CNVs and Translocations

Conventional cytogenetics are the gold standard for the identification of chromosomal alterations recurrent in myeloid neoplasms. Some next-generation sequencing (NGS) panels are designed for the detection of copy number variations (CNV) or translocations; however, their use is far from being widespread. Here we report on the results of a commercial panel including frequent mutations, CNVs and translocations in myeloid neoplasms. Frequent chromosomal alterations were analyzed by NGS in 135 patients with myeloid neoplasms and three with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. NGS analysis was performed using the enrichment-capture Myeloid Neoplasm-GeneSGKit (Sistemas Genómicos, Spain) gene panel including 35 genes for mutational analysis and frequent CNVs and translocations. NGS results were validated with cytogenetics and/or MLPA when possible. A total of 66 frequent alterations included in NGS panel were detected, 48 of them detected by NGS and cytogenetics. Ten of them were observed only by cytogenetics (mainly trisomy 8), and another eight only by NGS (mainly deletion of 12p). Aside from this, 38 secondary CNVs were detected in any of the genes included mainly for mutational analysis. NGS represents a reliable complementary source of information for the analysis of CNVs and translocations. Moreover, NGS could be a useful tool for the detection of alterations not observed by conventional cytogenetics.

Cytogenetic and Array-CGH Characterization of a Simple Case of Reciprocal t(3;10) Translocation Reveals a Hidden Deletion at 5q12

Chromosome deletions, including band 5q12, have rarely been reported and have been associated with a wide range of clinical manifestations, such as postnatal growth retardation, intellectual disability, hyperactivity, nonspecific ocular defects, facial dysmorphism, and epilepsy. In this study, we describe for the first time a child with growth retardation in which we identified a balanced t(3;10) translocation by conventional cytogenetic analysis in addition to an 8.6 Mb 5q12 deletion through array-CGH. Our results show that the phenotypic abnormalities of a case that had been interpreted as “balanced” by conventional cytogenetics are mainly due to a cryptic deletion, highlighting the need for molecular investigation in subjects with an abnormal phenotype before assuming the cause is an apparently simple cytogenetic rearrangement. Finally, we identify PDE4D and PIK3R1 genes as the two major candidates responsible for the clinical features expressed in our patient.

Comparative Cytogenetics in Four Leptodactylus Species (Amphibia, Anura, Leptodactylidae): Evidence of Inner Chromosomal Diversification in Highly Conserved Karyotypes

With 82 species currently described, the genus <i>Leptodactylus</i> is the most diverse and representative one in the family Leptodactylidae. Concerning chromosomal organization, this genus represents an interesting and underexplored group since data from molecular cytogenetics are incipient, and little is known about the organization and distribution of repetitive DNA elements in the karyotypes. In this sense, this study aimed at providing a comparative analysis in 4 <i>Leptodactylus</i> species (<i>L. macrosternum, L. pentadactylus, L. fuscus,</i> and <i>Leptodactylus</i> cf<i>. podicipinus</i>), combining conventional cytogenetics (Giemsa staining, C-banding, and AgNOR staining) and mapping of molecular markers (18S rDNA, telomeric and microsatellite probes), to investigate mechanisms underlying their karyotype differentiation process. The results showed that all species had karyotypes with 2n = 22 and FN = 44, except for <i>Leptodactylus</i> cf. <i>podicipinus</i> which presented FN = 36. The 18S rDNA was observed in pair 8 of all analyzed species (corresponding to pair 4 in <i>L. pentadactylus</i>), coinciding with the secondary constrictions and AgNOR staining. FISH with microsatellite DNA probes demonstrated species-specific patterns, as well as an association of these repetitive sequences with constitutive heterochromatin blocks and ribosomal DNA clusters, revealing the dynamics of microsatellites in the genome of the analyzed species. In summary, our data demonstrate an ongoing process of genomic divergence inside species with almost similar karyotype, driven most likely by a series of pericentric inversions, followed by differential accumulation of repetitive sequences.

One healthy live birth after preimplantation genetic testing of a cryptic balanced translocation (9;13) in a family with cerebral palsy and glaucoma: a case report

Background Cryptic balanced translocations often evade detection by conventional cytogenetics. The preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) technique can be used to help carriers of balanced translocations give birth to healthy offspring; however, for carriers of cryptic balanced translocations, there is only one report about trying assisted reproduction using the PGT technique but with no pregnancy. Case presentation A couple had 3 births out of 4 pregnancies, and all died very young, with two of them having both cerebral palsy and glaucoma. The husband with oligoasthenospermia was found to be a cryptic balanced translocation carrier for t (9,13) (p24.3, q31.3) with G-banding, FISH (fluorescence in-situ hybridization), and MicroSeq techniques; live birth of a healthy baby girl was achieved with PGT/NGS (next-generation sequencing) for the couple. Conclusion Here, we report for the first time a successful live birth of a healthy baby through the PGT technique for a family in which the husband is a carrier of the cryptic balanced translocation t (9,13) (p24.3, q31.3), presumably causative for cerebral palsy and glaucoma. Our study showed that the PGT/NGS technique can effectively help families with a cryptic balanced translocation have healthy offspring.