Polymorphisms in the multidrug resistance gene MDR1 (ABCB1) predict for molecular resistance in patients with newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia receiving high-dose imatinib

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (26) ◽  
pp. 6144-6145 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wendy Deenik ◽  
Bronno van der Holt ◽  
Jeroen J. W. M. Janssen ◽  
Isabel W. T. Chu ◽  
Peter J. M. Valk ◽  
...  
Tumor Biology ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 35 (11) ◽  
pp. 10969-10975 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kassogue Yaya ◽  
Dehbi Hind ◽  
Quachouh Meryem ◽  
Quessar Asma ◽  
Benchekroun Said ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 265-269 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ling-Na Ni ◽  
Jian-Yong Li ◽  
Kou-Rong Miao ◽  
Chun Qiao ◽  
Su-Jiang Zhang ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 1692-1692 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmet Emre Eskazan ◽  
Suzin Catal Tatonyan ◽  
Ayse Salihoglu ◽  
Emine Gulturk ◽  
M. Cem Ar ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 1692 Background: There has been a remarkable improvement in the management of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) after imatinib mesylate (IM) became available in the market, but there is still a group of patients who are resistant to imatinib. Although point mutations in the BCR-ABL kinase domain is the most common mechanism for resistance in patients with CML receiving tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy, there are several mechanisms that can play a role in the resistance to TKIs. Multi drug resistance gene (MDR1) [ABCB1 (ATP-binding cassette, sub-family B (MDR/TAP), member 1) ] product is an ATP-driven efflux pump contributing to the pharmacokinetics of drugs that are P-glycoprotein (P-gp) substrates and to the multidrug resistance of cancer cells. More than 50 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) have been identified concerning the MDR1 gene, and SNP polymorphisms may affect the expression and function of the P-gp. The SNPs T1236C, G2677T/A, and C3435T are the most common variants in the coding region of ABCB1. Imatinib is a substrate of P-gp-mediated efflux, and P-gp mediated drug efflux can play a role in IM resistance. So identifying these SNPs may allow to predict the drug disposition and responses to IM in CML patients. The aim of the study was to identify the C3435T SNP variants, and the associations between MDR1 C3435T polymorphism and IM efficacy in our CML patients. Methods: Between December 2010 and March 2011, 110 chronic phase (CP) CML patients who consecutively visited our outpatient clinic were enrolled in this study. Hematologic, cytogenetic and molecular response patterns to IM as well as the association between MDR1 C3435T polymorphism and responses to imatinib were evaluated in our patient cohort. MDR1 C3435T polymorphisms were detected by real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). We could assess complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) and major molecular response (MMR) in one hundred and six patients (96%) among these 110 patients. The differences in genotype frequencies in all patients taking imatinib treatment was determined by using the chi-square test. All tests were two-sided, and p <0.05 was considered as statistical significant. This study was approved by the local research ethics committee, and written informed consent was obtained from the patients. Results: 59 patients were male (54%), and fifty-one were female (46%). Median age was 50.5 years (range, 19–84 years). 37.6% of the patients were low, 45% were intermediate, and 17.4% were high risk according to Sokal risk score. The CCyR rate was 71%, and MMR rate was 60%. The frequencies of MDR1 3435 CC, CT, and TT genotypes were 22.5%, 55%, and 22.5%, respectively. No statistically significant difference was observed between the frequencies of the genotypes according to gender. The CCyR rates in patients with CC, CT, and TT genotypes were 88%, 62%, and 75%, respectively (Figure 1). The patients with CC genotype had significantly higher CCyR rates when compared to patients having CT/TT and CT genotypes (p =0.04 and p =0.023, respectively) (Table 1). The patients with CC, CT, and TT genotypes did not differ significantly between each other regarding the MMR rates. There were no significant difference between the C3435T genotypes and second generation TKI usage regarding both CCyR and MMR. Conclusion: Before starting IM therapy, the individual patientÕs MDR1 gene polymorphism pattern can be important in determining the treatment strategy in patients with CML. Among our patient cohort, the patients with CC genotype had significantly higher CCyR rates than patients with CT/TT and CT genotypes. Up to now, there are a few studies in CML patients with different results regarding MDR1 gene polymorphisms, and since racial differences can be seen in the frequencies of MDR1 gene polymorphisms, further studies in larger series are needed to define the genetic polymorphisms with therapeutic relevance in patients on imatinib. Disclosure: This study was supported by Istanbul University Research Fund. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2010 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 424-430 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jorge E. Cortes ◽  
Michele Baccarani ◽  
François Guilhot ◽  
Brian J. Druker ◽  
Susan Branford ◽  
...  

PurposeTo evaluate the safety and efficacy of initial treatment with imatinib mesylate 800 mg/d (400 mg twice daily) versus 400 mg/d in patients with newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase.Patients and MethodsA total of 476 patients were randomly assigned 2:1 to imatinib 800 mg (n = 319) or 400 mg (n = 157) daily. The primary end point was the major molecular response (MMR) rate at 12 months.ResultsAt 12 months, differences in MMR and complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) rates were not statistically significant (MMR, 46% v 40%; P = .2035; CCyR, 70% v 66%; P = .3470). However, MMR occurred faster among patients randomly assigned to imatinib 800 mg/d, who had higher rates of MMR at 3 and 6 months compared with those in the imatinib 400-mg/d arm (P = .0035 by log-rank test). CCyR also occurred faster in the 800-mg/d arm (CCyR at 6 months, 57% v 45%; P = .0146). The most common adverse events were edema, gastrointestinal problems, and rash, and all were more common in patients in the 800-mg/d arm. Grades 3 to 4 hematologic toxicity also occurred more frequently in patients receiving imatinib 800 mg/d.ConclusionMMR rates at 1 year were similar with imatinib 800 mg/d and 400 mg/d, but MMR and CCyR occurred earlier in patients treated with 800 mg/d. Continued follow-up is needed to determine the clinical significance of earlier responses on high-dose imatinib.


2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (28) ◽  
pp. 4754-4759 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jorge E. Cortes ◽  
Hagop M. Kantarjian ◽  
Stuart L. Goldberg ◽  
Bayard L. Powell ◽  
Francis J. Giles ◽  
...  

Purpose Long-term clinical outcome data have established imatinib 400 mg/d as standard front-line treatment for newly diagnosed patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Patients and Methods The Rationale and Insight for Gleevec High-Dose Therapy (RIGHT) trial is a multicenter study of imatinib 400 mg twice a day as initial therapy in 115 patients (70% Sokal low risk) with newly diagnosed CML in chronic phase who were observed for both molecular and cytogenetic responses for up to 18 months. Eighty-three patients (72%) completed the study, 10 patients (9%) discontinued the study because of adverse events, and six patients (5%) discontinued because of unsatisfactory therapeutic effect. Results Polymerase chain reaction analysis demonstrated rapid kinetics of major molecular response (MMR), with 48% of patients achieving MMR by 6 months, 54% by 12 months, and 63% by 18 months. Corresponding complete molecular response rates were 39%, 44%, and 55%, respectively. Median dose-intensity was 98%. Overall, 79% of patients who received at least 90% dose-intensity achieved MMR. The most frequent adverse events included myelosuppression, rash, fatigue, and musculoskeletal symptoms. Conclusion This study suggests that imatinib 400 mg twice a day results in more rapid reduction in tumor burden than imatinib 400 mg/d with minimal added toxicity.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document