scholarly journals Dasatinib or imatinib in newly diagnosed chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia: 2-year follow-up from a randomized phase 3 trial (DASISION)

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 119 (5) ◽  
pp. 1123-1129 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hagop M. Kantarjian ◽  
Neil P. Shah ◽  
Jorge E. Cortes ◽  
Michele Baccarani ◽  
Mohan B. Agarwal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Cytogenetic Response ◽  
Primary Data ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Log Reduction ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Dasatinib is a highly potent BCR-ABL inhibitor with established efficacy and safety in imatinib-resistant/-intolerant patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). In the phase 3 DASISION trial, patients with newly diagnosed chronic-phase (CP) CML were randomized to receive dasatinib 100 mg (n = 259) or imatinib 400 mg (n = 260) once daily. Primary data showed superior efficacy for dasatinib compared with imatinib after 12 months, including significantly higher rates of complete cytogenetic response (CCyR), confirmed CCyR (primary end point), and major molecular response (MMR). Here, 24-month data are presented. Cumulative response rates by 24 months in dasatinib and imatinib arms were: CCyR in 86% versus 82%, MMR in 64% versus 46%, and BCR-ABL reduction to ≤ 0.0032% (4.5-log reduction) in 17% versus 8%. Transformation to accelerated-/ blast-phase CML on study occurred in 2.3% with dasatinib versus 5.0% with imatinib. BCR-ABL mutations, assessed after discontinuation, were detected in 10 patients in each arm. In safety analyses, fluid retention, superficial edema, myalgia, vomiting, and rash were less frequent with dasatinib compared with imatinib, whereas pleural effusion and grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia were more frequent with dasatinib. Overall, dasatinib continues to show faster and deeper responses compared with imatinib, supporting first-line use of dasatinib in patients with newly diagnosed CML-CP. This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00481247.

scholarly journals Efficacy and Safety of Radotinib Compared with Imatinib in Newly Diagnosed Chronic Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients: 12 Months Result of Phase 3 Clinical Trial

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 476-476 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jae-Yong Kwak ◽  
Hawk Kim ◽  
Jeong A Kim ◽  
Young Rok Do ◽  
Hyeoung Joon Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Blast Crisis ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Cytogenetic Response ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Background Radotinib is a second generation BCR-ABL1 tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) developed by IL-YANG Pharm. Co., Ltd (Seoul, South Korea) and approved by the Korea FDA for the treatment of chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML-CP) patients who have failed prior TKIs. We conducted the randomized, open-label, phase 3 study to assess the efficacy and safety of radotinib, as compared with imatinib, for the first-line treatment of newly diagnosed CML-CP. Methods Based on baseline demographics and Sokal risk score, 241 patients were randomized 1:1:1 to radotinib 300 mg twice daily (bid) (n=79), radotinib 400 mg bid (n=81), or imatinib 400 mg once daily (qd) (n=81). The primary endpoint was the rate of major molecular response (MMR) by 12 months and molecular response was assessed by RQ-PCR at baseline and every 3 months. Secondary endpoints were the rate of complete cytogenetic response (CCyR), MR4.5 by 12 months, and the rate of progression to accelerate phase or blast crisis. Results All three study groups were well balanced with baseline age, gender, race and Sokal risk score. With minimum follow-up of 12 months, the proportions of patients receiving a study drug were 86.3% (69/79) in radotinib 300 mg bid group, 71.6% (58/81) in radotinib 400 mg bid group, and 81.5% (66/81) in imatinib 400 mg qd group. By 12 months, rates of MMR were significantly higher in patients receiving radotinib 300 mg bid (51.9%, P = .0044) and radotinib 400 mg bid (45.7%, P = .0342) compared with imatinib (29.6%). The median time to MMR among responders were shorter on radotinib 300 mg bid (5.7 months) and radotinib 400 mg bid (5.6 months) than imatinib group (8.2 months). The MR4.5 rates by 12 months were also higher for both radotinib 300 mg bid (15.2%) and 400 mg bid (13.6%) compared to imatinib (8.6%). The CCyR rates by 12 months were also higher for radotinib 300 mg bid (91.1%, P = .0120) compared with imatinib (76.5%). There was no progression to accelerated phase or blast crisis in all groups by 12 months. Discontinuation due to adverse events (AEs) or laboratory abnormalities occurred in 7 (8.8%), 16 (19.8%), and 5 (6.2%) patients for radotinib 300 mg bid, radotinib 400 mg bid and imatinib, respectively. Grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia occurred in 16.5% of patients receiving radotinib 300 mg bid, in 13.6% for radotinib 400 mg bid, and in 19.8% receiving imatinib. And grade 3/4 neutropenia occurred in 19.0%, 23.5%, and 29.6% for radotinib 300 mg bid, 400 mg bid and imatinib, respectively. The most common any grade non-laboratory AEs were skin rash (35.4% and 33.3%), nausea/vomiting (22.8% and 23.5%), headache (19.0% and 30.9%), and pruritus (19.0% and 30.0%) in radotinib 300 mg bid and radotinib 400 mg bid, respectively; AEs in the imatinib group were edema (34.6%), myalgia (28.4%), nausea/vomiting (27.2%), and skin rash (22.2%). Overall, grade 3/4 non-laboratory AEs were uncommon in all groups. Conclusions With minimum 12 months follow-up, radotinib demonstrated significantly higher and faster rates of CCyR and MMR than imatinib in patients with newly diagnosed CML-CP. The safety profiles of the radotinib and imatinib were different, and most AEs were manageable with optimal dose reduction. The results of this trial support that radotinib can be one of the standard of care in newly diagnosed CML-CP. Table. Baseline Characteristics, Molecular and Cytogenetic Response Rates Radotinib 300mg BID Radotinib 400mg BID Imatinib 400mg QD (N=79) (N=81) (N=81) Age, median (range), years 45 (20-75) 43 (18-84) 45 (18-83) Gender, n (%) Male 52 (65.8) 47 (58.0) 52 (64.2) Female 27 (34.2) 34 (42.0) 29 (35.8) Sokal risk, n (%) Low 21 (26.6) 22 (27.2) 22 (27.2) Intermediate 38 (48.1) 38 (46.9) 39 (48.2) High 20 (25.3) 21 (25.9) 20 (24.7) MMR by 12 months, % 51.9 45.7 29.6 P = .0044 P = .0342 Cumulative Incidence of MMR by 12 months¢Ó, % 57.0 58.0 35.0 P = .0040 P = .0037 MR4.5 by 12 months, % 15.2 13.6 8.6 CCyR by 12 months, % 91.1 81.5 76.5 ¢Ó Kaplan-Meier estimates of MMR Disclosures Kim: IL-YANG Pharm. Co. Ltd: Research Funding. Kim:Alexion Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Chung:Alexion Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Choi:Alexion Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding.

Clinical Efficacy and Safety Of Dasatinib For Newly Diagnosed Chronic Myeloid Leukemia In Chronic Phase In Japan

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 1493-1493
Author(s):  
Kohei Yamaguchi ◽  
Kazunori Murai ◽  
Shigeki Ito ◽  
Tomoaki Akagi ◽  
Kazuei Ogawa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Cytogenetic Response ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Major Molecular Response ◽  
Once Daily

Abstract Background Dasatinib is a second-generation BCR-ABL inhibitor that has a 325-fold higher potency than imatinib and a 16-fold higher potency than nilotinib in vitro. The previous report from the global DASISION trial showed dasatinib resulted in significantly higher and faster rates of complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) and major molecular response (MMR) compared with imatinib. We conducted a phase II study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of dasatinib in patients with newly diagnosed chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML-CP) in Japan. Methods Eighty newly diagnosed CML-CP patients were include in this study. Patients received dasatinib 100mg once daily. Treatment was continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Primary end point was the rate of major molecular response (MMR) by 12 months. MMR defined as a BCR-ABL transcript level of 0.1% or lower on the International scale by means of a real-time quantitative reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) in peripheral blood. Secondary end points were the rate of complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) by 12 months, the rate of MR4.5 (either (i) detectable disease with <0.0032% BCR-ABL1 IS or (ii) undetectable disease in cDNA with >32,000 ABL1 transcripts in the same volume of cDNA used to test for BCR-ABL1) by 12 months and adverse events of dasatinib (UMIN #000006358). Results Eighty newly diagnosed CML-CP patients were included in this study. All except one patient administered dasatinib 100 mg once daily. One patient was withdrawal before administration of dasatinib. So far, there were 71 patients with 6 months follow-up and 51 patients with 12 months follow-up. The estimated MMR rates were 69.5 % (95%CI, 58.7-80.3 %) by 6 months and 82.7% (95%CI, 73.0-92.4 %) by 12 months. The estimated MR4.5 rates were 27.1 % (95%CI, 16.7-37.5 %) by 6 months and 48.9% (95%CI, 36.0-61.7 %) by 12 months. Only 6 patients were withdrawal because of adverse event (5 patients) and ineffectiveness (1 patient). Conclusion Dasatinib treatment results in higher rates of molecular responses in newly diagnosed CML-CP patients in Japan. Dasatinib as the first-line agent might be acceptable for CML-CP patients because of better clinical efficacy and less toxicity. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

How I treat chronic myeloid leukemia in the imatinib era

Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (8) ◽  
pp. 2828-2837 ◽  
Author(s):  
John M. Goldman
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Initial Treatment ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Response To Treatment ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Allogeneic Transplant ◽  
Reduced Intensity Conditioning ◽  
Log Reduction

AbstractAlthough it is now generally accepted that imatinib is the best initial treatment for patients newly diagnosed with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in chronic phase, a number of questions remain unanswered. For example, (1) Is imatinib the best initial treatment for every chronic-phase patient? (2) At what dose should imatinib be started? (3) How should response to treatment be monitored? (4) For how long should the drug be continued in patients who have achieved and maintain a complete molecular response? (5) How does one handle a patient who achieves a 2-log but not a 3-log reduction in BCR-ABL transcripts? (6) How should response or failure be defined? (7) For the patient deemed to have failed imatinib, should one offer dasatinib or nilotinib? (8) For the patient who has failed imatinib but has a possible allogeneic transplant donor, should one offer dasatinib or nilotinib before recommending a transplantation? (9) Should the transplantation be myeloablative or reduced intensity conditioning? (10) How should one treat the patient who relapses after allografting? This paper will address these issues, many of which cannot yet be answered definitively.

Better Molecular Response (MR) to Imatinib (IM) in Early Chronic Phase (CP) Versus Late CP Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) Patients (pts) in Complete Cytogenetic Response (CCR): A Comparison at 24 Months of 2 Clinical Trials of the GIMEMA Working Party on CML on Behalf of the GIMEMA Working Party on Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (GIMEMA-CML).

Blood ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 106 (11) ◽  
pp. 1096-1096 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angela Poerio ◽  
Marilina Amabile ◽  
Ilaria Iacobucci ◽  
Simona Soverini ◽  
Sabrina Colarossi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Nested Pcr ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Working Party ◽  
Cytogenetic Response ◽  
Interferon Α ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Front Line ◽  
Log Reduction

Abstract We sought to determine the differences in molecular response between early and late CP pts with CML who achieved a CCR after treatment with IM at the standard dose of 400mg/d. We studied 2 different cohorts of patients in CCR: 67/191 (35%) pts after α-Interferon (α-IFN) failure enrolled on the CML/002/STI571 protocol 53/76 (70%) pts treated front line with a combination of IM and pegilated IFN-α (PEG-IFN) enrolled on the CML/011/STI571 protocol Cytogenetic response was monitored on bone marrow (BM) metaphases and molecular response was assessed by real time RT-PCR (TaqMan) BM and peripheral blood (PB) samples, collected at baseline, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months during the first year, and every 6 months thereafter. Molecular response was expressed as the ratio between BCR/ABL and β2-microglobulin (β2-M) x100. The lowest level of detectability of the method was 10−5. Negative results (i.e. undetectable transcript) were confirmed by nested PCR performed 4 times (sensitivity 10−6). For the purpose of this analysis, a major molecular response (MMR) was defined as a BCR-ABL/β2M value &lt;0.0001%, which turned out to be roughly equivalent to a 3-log reduction and a complete molecular response (CMR) was defined as negative (undetectable) BCR/ABL levels confirmed by nested PCR. We observed a progressive decrease of the amount of BCR/ABL transcript in pts who achieved a CCR. At 24 months the median reduction in BCR/ABL transcript level was: a 3-log reduction in late CP pts a 4-log reduction in early CP pts In the latter group of pts MR was assessed also at 36 months. So we observed that 36 months after the first dose of IM and PEG-IFN pts who were still in CCR had the median value of BCR/ABL transcript of 0.00001% both in BM and PB. Therefore all these pts achieved a MMR. However only 8/53 (4%) pts were in CMR (undetectable BCR/ABL at least once as assessed by nested PCR). We conclude that front-line treatment with IM results in a better quality MR (4-log reduction in BCR/ABL transcript levels in early CP pts, as against a 3-log reduction in late CP pts). Figure Figure

scholarly journals Bosutinib Versus Imatinib in Newly Diagnosed Chronic-Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: Results From the BELA Trial

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (28) ◽  
pp. 3486-3492 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jorge E. Cortes ◽  
Dong-Wook Kim ◽  
Hagop M. Kantarjian ◽  
Tim H. Brümmendorf ◽  
Irina Dyagil ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Cytogenetic Response ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Blast Phase ◽  
End Point

Purpose Bosutinib is an oral Src/Abl tyrosine kinase inhibitor. The phase III Bosutinib Efficacy and Safety in Newly Diagnosed Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (BELA) trial compared bosutinib with imatinib in newly diagnosed, chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Patients and Methods A total of 502 patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to bosutinib 500 mg per day or imatinib 400 mg per day. Results The complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) rate at 12 months was not different for bosutinib (70%; 95% CI, 64% to 76%) versus imatinib (68%; 95% CI, 62% to 74%; two-sided P = .601); therefore, the study did not achieve its primary end point. The major molecular response (MMR) rate at 12 months was higher with bosutinib (41%; 95% CI, 35% to 47%) compared with imatinib (27%; 95% CI, 22% to 33%; two-sided P < .001). Time to CCyR and MMR was faster with bosutinib compared with imatinib (two-sided P < .001 for both). On-treatment transformation to accelerated/blast phase occurred in four patients (2%) on bosutinib compared with 10 patients (4%) on imatinib. A total of three CML-related deaths occurred on the bosutinib arm compared with eight on the imatinib arm. The safety profiles of bosutinib and imatinib were distinct; GI and liver-related events were more frequent with bosutinib, whereas neutropenia, musculoskeletal disorders, and edema were more frequent with imatinib. Conclusion This ongoing trial did not meet its primary end point of CCyR at 12 months, despite the observed higher MMR rate at 12 months, faster times to CCyR and MMR, fewer on-treatment transformations to accelerated/blast phase, and fewer CML-related deaths with bosutinib compared with imatinib. Each drug had a distinct safety profile.

scholarly journals Bosutinib in the Real-Life Treatment of Chronic Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) Patients Aged > 65 Years Resistant/Intolerant to Frontline Tyrosine-Kynase Inhibitors

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 1649-1649 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roberto Latagliata ◽  
Imma Attolico ◽  
Malgorzata Monika Trawinska ◽  
Isabella Capodanno ◽  
Mario Annunziata ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Cytogenetic Response ◽  
Hematological Toxicity ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Grade 3

Background Bosutinib is a 2nd generation tyrosine-kinase inhibitor (TKI) active in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) patients resistant or intolerant to frontline imatinib, dasatinib or nilotinib; the favourable toxicity profile makes bosutinib potentially useful in elderly patients, but at present there are no data in unselected cohorts of these subjects. Aim To highlight this issue, a real-life cohort of 91 patients followed in 21 Italian Centers and treated with bosutinib when aged > 65 years was retrospectively evaluated. Patients The main clinical features of the whole cohort at diagnosis and at baseline of bosutinib treatment are reported in the Table; all patients were in CP when bosutinib was started. Median interval from diagnosis to bosutinib treatment was 49.7 months [interquartile range (IQR) 14.2 - 117.5]. Results Starting dose of bosutinib was 500 mg/day in 20 patients (22.0%), 400 mg/day in 7 patients (7.7%), 300 mg/day in 28 patients (30.8%), 200 mg/day in 34 patients (37.3%) and 100 mg/day in 2 patients (2.2%), respectively. After a median period of treatment of 18.1 months (IQR 9.4 - 27.7) all patients were evaluable for toxicity; on the whole, all grade hematological and extra-hematological toxicities were reported in 12/91 (13.1%) and 45/91 (49.4%) patients, respectively. A grade 3 - 4 hematological toxicity occurred in 5/91 patients (5.4%); a grade 3 - 4 extra-hematological toxicity occurred in 16/91 patients (17.5%). Overall, 46 patients (50.5%) never discontinued bosutinib: a temporary discontinuation < 6 weeks was needed in 19 patients (20.9%) and a temporary discontinuation > 6 weeks in 2 patients (2.2%). A permanent bosutinib discontinuation was needed in the remaining 24 patients (26.4%): in particular, 11 patients (12.1%) permanently discontinued bosutinib due to toxicity (skin rash in 3 cases, gastro-intestinal toxicity in 3 cases, pleural effusion in 2 cases, transaminitis, QTc prolongation and myalgia in 1 case each), 6 patients (6.6%) due to resistance and 7 patients (7.7%) due to other reasons (unrelated death in 6 cases and patient decision in 1 case). As to response, 5 patients (5.5%) were considered too early for assessment (< 3 months of treatment); among the 86 patients evaluable for response, 11 patients (12.7%) did not have any response (including 6 patients who discontinued bosutinib for early toxicity), 4 (4.6%) achieved hematological response only, and 71 (82.5%) achieved Cytogenetic Response (CyR) (Major CyR in 4, Complete CyR in 67). Among the 67 patients in Complete CyR, 58 (67.4% of all 86 evaluable patients) also achieved Molecular Response (MR) [Major MR (MR 3.0) in 19 (22.1%), Deep MR (MR 4.0/4.5) in 39 (45.3%)]. The 3-year Overall Survival and Event-Free Survival of the whole cohort of patients from bosutinib start were 83.0% (CI95% 71.6 - 94.4) (Figure 1) and 59.5% (CI95% 39.9 - 72.1), respectively. Conclusions Our real-life data show that bosutinib is effective, even if initial doses in many cases were lower than recommended, with a favourable safety profile also in elderly patients with important comorbidities resistant/intolerant to previous TKI treatments,: as a consequence, it could play a significant role in the current clinical practise for these frail patients. Disclosures Latagliata: Celgene: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria. Trawinska:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria. Annunziata:Pfizer: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy. Elena:Novartis: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy. Crugnola:Incyte: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria. Bonifacio:Novartis: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria. Sgherza:Incyte: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria. Iurlo:Pfizer: Other: Speaker Honoraria; Incyte: Other: Speaker Honoraria; Novartis: Other: Speaker Honoraria. Breccia:Celgene: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria.

Imatinib for Newly Diagnosed Patients With Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: Incidence of Sustained Responses in an Intention-to-Treat Analysis

2008 ◽  
Vol 26 (20) ◽  
pp. 3358-3363 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hugues de Lavallade ◽  
Jane F. Apperley ◽  
Jamshid S. Khorashad ◽  
Dragana Milojkovic ◽  
Alistair G. Reid ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Cytogenetic Response ◽  
Kinase Domain ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Imatinib Treatment ◽  
Newly Diagnosed

Purpose Imatinib is remarkably effective in treating newly diagnosed patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in chronic phase (CP). To date, most of the available data come from a single multicenter study in which some of the patients were censored for diverse reasons. Here, we report our experience in treating patients at a single institution in a setting where all events were recorded. Patients and Methods A total of 204 consecutive adult patients with newly diagnosed CML in CP received imatinib from June 2000 until August 2006. Response (hematologic, cytogenetic, and molecular), progression-free survival (PFS) and survival were evaluated. Results At 5 years, cumulative incidences of complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) and major molecular response (MMR) were 82.7% and 50.1%, respectively. Estimated overall survival and PFS were 83.2% and 82.7%, respectively. By 5 years, 25% of patients had discontinued imatinib treatment because of an unsatisfactory response and/or toxicity. The 5-year probability of remaining in major cytogenetic response while still receiving imatinib was 62.7%. Patients achieving a CCyR at 1 year had a better PFS and overall survival than those failing to reach CCyR, but achieving a MMR conferred no further advantage. The identification of a kinase domain mutation was the only factor predicting for loss of CCyR. Conclusion Imatinib is highly effective in most patients with CML-CP; patients who respond are likely to live substantially longer than those treated with earlier therapies. Achieving CCyR correlated with PFS and overall survival, but achieving MMR had no further predictive value. However, approximately one third of patients still need better therapy.

scholarly journals Results of Dasatinib Therapy in Patients With Early Chronic-Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia

2010 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 398-404 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jorge E. Cortes ◽  
Dan Jones ◽  
Susan O'Brien ◽  
Elias Jabbour ◽  
Farhad Ravandi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Cytogenetic Response ◽  
Initial Therapy ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Nonhematologic Toxicity ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Grade 3

PurposeDasatinib is effective therapy for chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) after imatinib failure. In this study, we investigate the efficacy of dasatinib as initial therapy for patients with CML in early chronic phase.Patients and MethodsPatients with newly diagnosed CML in early chronic phase were randomly assigned to receive dasatinib 100 mg once daily or 50 mg twice daily as initial therapy.ResultsAmong 50 patients observed for at least 3 months, 49 patients (98%) achieved a complete cytogenetic response (CCyR), and 41 patients (82%) achieved a major molecular response (MMR). Responses occurred rapidly, with 94% of patients achieving CCyR by 6 months. There was no difference in response rate by treatment arm. The projected event-free survival rate at 24 months is 88%, and all patients are alive after a median follow-up time of 24 months. Grade ≥ 3 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia occurred in 21% and 10% of patients, respectively. Nonhematologic toxicity was usually grade 1 to 2. There was no significant difference in toxicity between the two arms, and the actual median dose at 12 months was 100 mg (range, 20 to 100 mg).ConclusionDasatinib is an effective agent for the initial management of CML in early chronic phase, producing high rates of CCyR and MMR.

scholarly journals Minimal cross-intolerance with nilotinib in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic or accelerated phase who are intolerant to imatinib

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 117 (21) ◽  
pp. 5600-5606 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jorge E. Cortes ◽  
Andreas Hochhaus ◽  
Philipp D. le Coutre ◽  
Gianantonio Rosti ◽  
Javier Pinilla-Ibarz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Event ◽  
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Cytogenetic Response ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Complete Hematologic Response ◽  
Significant Efficacy ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Nilotinib has significant efficacy in patients with newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase (CML-CP) and in patients with CML-CP or CML in accelerated phase (CML-AP) after imatinib failure. We investigated the occurrence of cross-intolerance to nilotinib in imatinib-intolerant patients with CML. Only 1/75 (1%) patients with nonhematologic imatinib intolerance experienced a similar grade 3/4 adverse event (AE), and 3/75 (4%) experienced a similar persistent grade 2 nonhematologic AE on nilotinib. Only 7/40 (18%) patients with hematologic imatinib intolerance discontinued nilotinib, all because of grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia. Ninety percent of imatinib-intolerant patients with CML-CP who did not have complete hematologic response (CHR) at baseline (n = 52) achieved CHR on nilotinib. Nilotinib induced a major cytogenetic response in 66% and 41% of patients with imatinib-intolerant CML-CP and CML-AP (complete cytogenetic response in 51% and 30%), respectively. Minimal cross-intolerance was confirmed in patients with imatinib-intolerant CML. The favorable tolerability of nilotinib in patients with imatinib intolerance leads to alleviation of AE-related symptoms and significant and durable responses. In addition to its established clinical benefit in patients with newly diagnosed CML and those resistant to imatinib, nilotinib is effective and well-tolerated for long-term use in patients with imatinib intolerance. This study is registered at http://www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT00471497

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document