scholarly journals A phase 1 trial of ibrutinib plus palbociclib in previously treated mantle cell lymphoma

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 133 (11) ◽  
pp. 1201-1204 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Martin ◽  
Nancy L. Bartlett ◽  
Kristie A. Blum ◽  
Steven Park ◽  
Kami Maddocks ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mantle Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Response Duration ◽  
Phase 1 Trial ◽  
Mantle Cell ◽  
Previously Treated ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Single-agent ibrutinib is active in patients with previously treated mantle cell lymphoma (MCL); however, nearly half of all patients experience treatment failure during the first year. We previously demonstrated that prolonged early G1 cell cycle arrest induced by the oral, specific CDK4/6 inhibitor palbociclib can overcome ibrutinib resistance in primary human MCL cells and MCL cell lines expressing wild-type Bruton’s tyrosine kinase (BTK). Therefore, we conducted a phase 1 trial to evaluate the dosing, safety, and preliminary activity of palbociclib plus ibrutinib in patients with previously treated mantle cell lymphoma. From August 2014 to June 2016, a total of 27 patients (21 men, 6 women) were enrolled. The maximum tolerated doses were ibrutinib 560 mg daily plus palbociclib 100 mg on days 1 to 21 of each 28-day cycle. The dose-limiting toxicity was grade 3 rash. The most common grade 3 to 4 toxicities included neutropenia (41%), thrombocytopenia (30%), hypertension (15%), febrile neutropenia (15%), and lung infection (11%). The overall and complete response rates were 67% and 37%, and with a median follow-up of 25.6 months, the 2-year progression-free survival was 59.4% and the 2-year response duration was 69.8%. A phase 2 multicenter clinical trial to further characterize efficacy is now ongoing. The current trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02159755.

A Phase I/II Study of Lenalidomide in Combination with Rituximab in Relapsed/Refractory Mantle Cell Lymphoma.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 2719-2719 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luhua Wang ◽  
Luis Fayad ◽  
Fredrick B. Hagemeister ◽  
Sattva Neelapu ◽  
Felipe Samaniego ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mantle Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Mantle Cell ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 2719 Poster Board II-695 Background: Rituximab directly targets CD20 positive lymphoma cells while lenalidomide targets the microenvironment. This combination was proven effective in vitro and in vivo in mantle cell lymphoma (Wu et al, Clin Cancer Res 2008; Zhang et al, Am J Hematol 2009). Clinically, lenalidomide (Habermann et al, Br J Haematol 2009) and rituximab have single-agent activity in mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) and may be an effective combination. The goal of our study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) in phase 1 and evaluate the efficacy and safety of lenalidomide plus rituximab in patients with relapsed/refractory MCL in phase 2. Methods: Patients with relapsed/refractory MCL received lenalidomide on days 1–21 of every 28-day cycle, and rituximab (375 mg/m2) weekly during cycle 1. Dose escalation was used to determine the MTD with lenalidomide (10 mg, 15 mg, 20 mg, and 25 mg). Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as grade 3 or 4 non-hematologic, or grade 4 hematologic adverse events in cycle 1. Phase 2 has reached targeted enrolment with 45 patients treated at MTD. Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate progression free survival rate and response duration. Median time to event in months with 95% confidence interval was calculated. Of 45 patients treated at the MTD, the median age was 66 (46–85), 91% were males. All patients had received prior rituximab and were enrolled regardless of prior rituximab sensitivity or resistance. Results: The median follow-up time for the censored observations was 11.4 months. Two DLTs occurred at 25 mg in phase 1 (hypercalcemia, non-neutropenic fever); therefore, the MTD was 20 mg. The grade 3–4 non-hematologic events included elevated AST, elevated ALT, fatigue, myalgia, tremors, ataxia, cough, deep vein thrombosis, dyspnea, edema (facial), infection, neuropathy sensory, rash, and respiratory failure. Grade 3–4 hematologic adverse events included neutropenia (37 events), neutropenic fever (4 events), and thrombocytopenia (16 events). There were no responses in patients treated at 10 mg or 15 mg. Thirty six patients (36) were evaluable for response. Nine (9) patients are too early in their treatment and are not yet eligible for response evaluation. Among the 36 evaluable patients, 11 (31%) patients achieved CR, 8 (22%) patients achieved PR, 3 (8%) patients had minor response, 6 (17%) patients had stable disease and 8 (22%) patients had progressive mantle cell lymphoma. The overall response rate (CR + PR) was 53%. Seventy eight (78%) patients achieved stable disease or better and benefited from oral Lenalidomide plus 4 doses of rituximab. The median time to response was 2 months (2–8), and the median duration of response for the 19 patients with CR or PR was 18 months (95% CI: 10.6, NA) (range1–30 months). The median progression free survival for all patients on phase 2 was 14 months (95% CI: 9.8, NA) (ranging from 1–32 months). Conclusion: Oral lenalidomide plus rituximab resulted in durable responses in relapsed/refractory MCL with a favourable toxicity profile. Disclosures: Wang: Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding. Hagemeister:Celgene Corporation: Consultancy. Samaniego:Celgene Corporation: Research Funding. Yi:Celgene Corporation: Research Funding. Shah:Celgene Corporation: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Elan: Consultancy; Millennium: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Bell:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Knight:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Zeldis:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

scholarly journals A Phase I Trial of Ibrutinib Plus Palbociclib in Patients with Previously Treated Mantle Cell Lymphoma

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 150-150 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Martin ◽  
Kristie Blum ◽  
Nancy L. Bartlett ◽  
Steven I. Park ◽  
Kami J. Maddocks ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Mantle Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Hematological Toxicity ◽  
Mantle Cell ◽  
Previously Treated ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Dose Levels

Abstract Background Single-agent ibrutinib confers a response rate of 77%, including a complete response (CR) rate of 19% in patients with previously treated mantle cell lymphoma (MCL); however, with a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 14.6 months and 1-year response duration (RD) rate of 69%, nearly half of all patients experience treatment failure during the first year. We previously demonstrated that prolonged early G1 cell cycle arrest induced by the oral, specific CDK4/6 inhibitor palbociclib can overcome ibrutinib resistance in primary human samples and MCL cell lines with wild-type BTK (Chiron et al. Cancer Discovery 2014). We conducted a phase I trial to evaluate the safety and preliminary activity of palbociclib plus ibrutinib in patients with previously treated mantle cell lymphoma. Methods Adult patients who were ibrutinib and CDK4/6 inhibitor-naïve who had previously treated MCL were eligible to participate. The primary objective was to estimate the maximum tolerated dose of the combination. Consenting patients were enrolled to one of five dose levels, shown in Table 1. Patients were treated in 28 day cycles, with ibrutinib administered daily and palbociclib administered on days 1-21. (Table 1). Patients could continue to receive study treatment until progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent. Doses were escalated according to a standard phase I 3+3 design. Patients were evaluated for efficacy at the end of cycles 3 and 6, and every 6 cycles thereafter. All CRs, as documented by CT, required confirmation by PET/CT; bone marrow biopsy and endoscopy were also required in patients with known marrow or GI tract involvement, respectively. Additional objectives included pharmacokinetics and evaluation of pretreatment samples for biomarkers of response or resistance. Results From August 2014 to June 2016 a total of 20 patients (15 males, 5 females) were enrolled (DL1 n=3, DL2 n=3, DL3 n=6, DL4 n=3, DL5 n=5). The patients' MIPI risk distribution were 7 low, 7 intermediate, and 6 high. The median number of prior therapies was 1 (range 1-5). Six patients were refractory to their last prior therapy. Three patients experienced dose limiting toxicity: One patient treated at DL3 experienced grade 4 thrombocytopenia lasting more than 7 days, and grade 3 rash was seen in two patients at DL5. Grade 3-4 hematological toxicity included thrombocytopenia (28%), neutropenia (22%), and lymphopenia (17%). Grade 3-4 non-hematological toxicity regardless of attribution included one patient with each of the following: lung infection, ALT/AST increase, encephalitis, hyponatremia, sinus tachycardia, pneumonitis. Grade 1-2 adverse events related to treatment and occurring in at least 2 patients included the following: diarrhea (50%), fatigue (44%), rash (39%), bruising (17%), nausea (17%), fever (11%), dyspepsia (11%), and myalgia (11%). Other than the two patients that experienced grade 3 rash at DL5, no patients have required dose reductions; 6 patients required dose interruptions. Thirteen subjects continue on study therapy. The reasons for stopping treatment were disease progression (n=4), adverse event (elevated liver enzymes, n=1; and prolonged cytopenias, n=1), and allogeneic stem cell transplantation (n=1). Of the 18 patients that have had at least one response evaluation to date, 12 (67%) patients responded to treatment and 8 (44%) achieved a CR. The median time to CR was 3 cycles and no responding patients have progressed on study. With a median follow up of 11 months, the estimated 1-year PFS and RD are 68% and 100%, respectively (Figure 1). Conclusions The mechanism-based combination of ibrutinib plus palbociclib is well tolerated and active. Toxicity is primarily related to myelosuppression of grade 1-2 severity, although grade 3 rash was observed at the highest doses evaluated. In this small group of patients, the combination produced responses at all dose levels, with a CR rate of 44% and a median time to CR of 3 months. No responding patients have progressed to date. These preliminary CR, PFS, and RD rates appear better than those reported in other studies of single-agent ibrutinib although the numbers of patients was very small. A phase II multi-center clinical trial to evaluate time to progression is planned. Biomarker studies to evaluate mechanisms of primary resistance are ongoing. Disclosures Martin: Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel, accommodations, expenses; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Gilead: Consultancy, Other: travel, accommodations, expenses; Novartis: Consultancy; Acerta: Consultancy; Teva: Research Funding. Ruan:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pharmacyclics, LLC, an AbbVie Company: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Research Funding.

Results of a Nonrandomized, Open-Label, Phase II Study of Combined Gemcitabine, Mitoxantrone, and Rituximab in Relapsed or Refractory Mantle Cell Lymphoma.

Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 4452-4452
Author(s):  
Lawrence E. Garbo ◽  
Patrick J. Flynn ◽  
Margaret A. MacRae ◽  
Mary A. Rauch ◽  
Yunfei Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mantle Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Mantle Cell ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is an aggressive type of B-cell non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma that usually presents as disseminated disease. Prognosis is poor, and responses to chemotherapy are less durable than those achieved in other types of lymphoma. New treatment options are desperately needed. Gemcitabine has shown activity in MCL as a single agent. In addition, the combination of mitoxantrone and rituximab has also been shown to be active in MCL. However, the use of these drugs in combination has not been evaluated in the treatment of MCL. The primary objective of this study was to determine the efficacy of gemcitabine+mitoxantrone+rituximab in relapsed or refractory MCL; secondary objectives were duration of response, survival at 1-year, progression-free survival (PFS), and toxicity, especially myelotoxicity. Sixteen patients were enrolled between April 2005 and December 2006, and only 15 were evaluable due to one patient’s withdrawal of consent. Patients received gemcitabine 900 mg/m2 IV (30–60 min infusion), mitoxantrone 10 mg/m2 IV (5–10 min infusion), and rituximab 375 mg/m2 IV on Day 1 (max 400 mg/hr). Patients also received gemcitabine 900 mg/m2 on Day 8 of the 21-day cycle. Medication was administered in the following order: gemcitabine→mitoxantrone→rituximab. Patients were to be treated for a maximum of 8 cycles or until the patient had evidence of a response, progressive disease, or intolerable toxicity. The median patient age was 74 years, 100% were white, and 69% were male. Of all patients, 86% had Stage IV MCL at baseline. Patients received a median of 6 cycles (range, 3 – 8). Efficacy results for the evaluable population are CR 13%, PR 27%, PD 13%, and SD 47%. Median PFS was 8.72 months (range, 1.84 – 23.49); median overall survival was 10.03 months (range, 2.50 – 23.49). Grade 3–4 treatment related toxicities reported in >1 patient were neutropenia (93%), leukopenia or thrombocytopenia (53% each), anemia (20%), and asthenia (13%). 60% of patients are currently alive as of July 2007; 9 patients discontinued study treatment due to disease progression (13%), toxicity (27%), MD request (7%), or withdrawal of consent (13%). 7 patients had normal study completion (44%). The study was closed early due to slow accrual owing to alternative treatment which became available at the time. The combination of gemcitabine, mitoxantrone, and rituximab in MCL was well-tolerated with manageable adverse events in spite of 93% neutropenia. Supplemented growth factor use was able to minimize neutropenia. No Grade 3–4 infection was reported. This regimen holds promise in patients with MCL and further studies are warranted. Updated data will be presented.

Anti-Tumor Activity of Single-Agent CCI-779 for Relapsed Mantle Cell Lymphoma: A Phase II Trial in the North Central Cancer Treatment Group.

Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 129-129 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Witzig ◽  
Susan Geyer ◽  
Irene Ghobrial ◽  
David Inwards ◽  
Rafael Fonseca ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cyclin D1 ◽  
Mantle Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Median Time ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Pi3k Pathway ◽  
Mantle Cell ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Anti Tumor Activity

Abstract Purpose: Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is characterized by a t(11;14) resulting in overexpression of cyclin D1, a member of the phosphatidylinosital 3 kinase (PI3K) pathway. This study tested whether CCI-779, which inhibits the PI3K pathway at the level of the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) could produce tumor responses in patients (pts) with MCL. Patients and Methods: Eligible pts had biopsy-proven, cyclin D1 positive MCL and had relapsed or were refractory to therapy. Pts received CCI-779 250 mg IV every week as a single agent. Pts were re-staged after 1 cycle (4 doses) and every 3 cycles thereafter. Pts with a tumor response after 6 cycles were eligible to continue drug for a total of 12 cycles or 2 cycles after complete remission (CR) and then were observed. Results: Thirty-five pts were enrolled and evaluable for toxicity; 1 patient had MCL by histology but was cyclin D1 negative and ineligible for efficacy evaluation. The median age was 70 years (range, 38–89), 91% were stage 4, and 69% had ≥ 2 extranodal sites. Pts had received a median of 3 prior therapies (range, 1–11) and 54% were refractory to their last treatment. The overall response rate was 38% (13/34) with 1 CR (3%) and 12 PRs (35%), surpassing the pre-defined criteria for a promising agent. Responses tended to occur rapidly with median time to response of 1 month (range, 1–8). To date, 26 patients have progressed, with a median time-to-progression of 6.8 months (95% CI: 3.8 – 9.7). Median duration of response for the 13 responders was 5.7 months (95% CI: 5.2 – 13.2). Overall, 32 out of 35 patients who received treatment had grade 3 or 4 toxicity. The most common toxicities were hematologic with grade 3 (n=24) or grade 4 (n=4). Thrombocytopenia was the most frequent grade 3/4 toxicity (n=25) and the largest cause of dose-reductions, although counts typically recovered within one week. Only 4 patients could tolerate sustained 250 mg per week throughout their treatment (including one who went on to alternate treatment after 1 cycle) and the median dose/month was 175 mg. Conclusions: Single-agent CCI-779 has substantial anti-tumor activity in relapsed MCL. This study demonstrates that agents, which selectively target cellular pathways dysregulated in MCL cells can produce therapeutic benefit. The high response rate warrants further studies of this agent in MCL, but the high incidence of hematologic toxicity suggests that a lower dose should be explored. CCI-779 at 25mg is currently being evaluated in MCL through an NCCTG trial

High Remission Rates and Prolonged Progression Free Survival in Newly Diagnosed Patients with Mantle Cell Lymphoma Treated with R-MACLOIVAM-T

Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 3597-3597 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter J Hosein ◽  
Daniel Morgensztern ◽  
Francine Coleman ◽  
Gail Walker ◽  
Maricer Escalon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Mantle Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Relapse Rate ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Mantle Cell ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Background: Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is an unfavorable subtype of B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma characterized by median progression-free survival (PFS) and median overall survival (OS) of only 1.5 and 3–4 years respectively. Although high-dose therapy and an autotransplant may prolong OS, it does not result in a long-term disease free survival. Therefore, there is a need for novel therapeutic approaches for this entity. Methods: We conducted a single-arm phase II study in subjects with newly-diagnosed MCL to assess efficacy and safety of a novel intensive regimen R-MACLO-IVAM-T, a modification of a protocol designed by Magrath et al (JCO1996;14:925). The study size of 22 patients was based on precision of a two-sided 95% confidence interval for the 18-month progression free survival rate. Eligible subjects had a confirmed diagnosis of MCL using WHO criteria, age 18–75 years, ECOG PS ≤ 2, adequate organ function and no history of HIV or prior cancer. Lymphoma extent at presentation was assessed by standard staging procedures as well as esophagogastroduodenoscopy and colonoscopy. Prior to initiating thalidomide maintenance, subjects were enrolled in the STEPS® program. Cycle 1 consisted of R-MACLO: rituximab 375 mg/m2 IV on day 1, doxorubicin 45 mg/m2 IV on day 1, cyclophosphamide 800 mg/m2 IV on day 1 and 200 mg/m2/day on days 2–5, vincristine 1.5 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 capped to 2mg, methotrexate 1.2 g/m2 IV on day 10 over 1 hour followed by 5.52 g/m2 IV over 23 hours followed by leucovorin 36 hours later. G-CSF was begun on day 13. When the ANC was >1.5×109/L, cycle 2 with R-IVAM was begun: rituximab 375 mg/m2 IV day 1, cytarabine 2 g/m2 IV every 12 hours on days 1 and 2, etoposide, 60 mg/m2 on days 1–5 and ifosfamide 1.5 g/m2 on days 1–5 with mesna. Fourteen days after ANC recovery from cycle 2, cycles 3 and 4 were given in identical fashion to 1 and 2. Four weeks after ANC recovery from cycle 4, subjects were re-staged and responses were assessed by standard criteria. Subjects achieving CR at the end of therapy received thalidomide 200 mg/day until MCL relapse or intolerable toxicity. Results: Accrual started in 4/2004 and ended in 3/2008 when the planned 22 subjects were enrolled. All subjects were evaluable for toxicity and 21 were evaluable for response. Median age was 56.5 years (range 39–73). All subjects had at least stage 3 disease with bone marrow involvement in 19 and gastrointestinal involvement in 10. Distribution according to IPI: 0–1 factor, 3; 2 factors, 8; 3 factors, 8; and 4 factors, 3. Twenty subjects had diffuse variant and 2 had blastic variant. Nineteen subjects completed all 4 cycles of therapy; treatment was stopped in 2 subjects after 2 and 3 cycles respectively, and one subject died during the first cycle. Of the 21 subjects completing 2 cycles of therapy, 20 achieved CR and one PR. Two subjects relapsed at 9 and 33 months respectively, while 19 remain relapse free after median follow-up of 25 months (range 5–51). With a total follow-up of 545 months, the estimated relapse rate is 4.4 per 100 patients per year. There were two deaths: 1 from sepsis on cycle 1 day 8 and the other in CR at 38 months from non-small cell lung cancer diagnosed 19 months after MCL. Common severe toxicities were grade 3–4 neutropenia, thrombocytopenia and anemia in 33%, 19% and 17% of R-MACLO cycles and in 50%, 88% and 68% of R-IVAM cycles respectively. There were 14 bacteremias in 82 cycles, 12 of which were after R-IVAM therapy. Six episodes of reversible grade 1–2 renal toxicity occurred after methotrexate. The thalidomide maintenance dose was reduced in 6 subjects due to grade 3–4 neutropenia and reduced or stopped in 8 subjects because of grade 3–4 peripheral neuropathy. Patients remain under follow-up for relapse and survival. Conclusions: R-MACLO-IVAM-T results in a high overall response rate of 100% (95% CR and 5% PR) and a low relapse rate. At a median follow-up of 25 months, median PFS and OS were not reached. The 2-year actuarial PFS of 94% compares favorably with previously reported 2-year actuarial PFS of 40% and 67% for CHOP-like regimens without and with upfront bone marrow transplantation (Blood2005;105: 2677). The contribution of thalidomide maintenance to this outcome requires additional study. A multicenter clinical trial is suggested.

Flavopiridol, Fludarabine and Rituximab Is a Highly Active Regimen in Indolent B-Cell Lymphoproliferative Disorders Including Mantle Cell Lymphoma.

Blood ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 106 (11) ◽  
pp. 944-944 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas S. Lin ◽  
Beth Fischer ◽  
Mollie E. Moran ◽  
Maureen M. Buckner ◽  
Roshini Shank ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
B Cell ◽  
Mantle Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Mantle Cell ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract The cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor flavopiridol was inactive when given by 24–72-hr infusion, but 1-hr IV bolus dosing demonstrated clinical activity in mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) and chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Flavopiridol induces apoptosis independent of p53 and may be able to eliminate tumor cells resistant to fludarabine and rituximab. We performed a phase I dose escalation study of flavopiridol in combination with fludarabine and rituximab (FFR) in patients (pts) with MCL, CLL and indolent B-cell non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL). Pts had ANC ≥ 1500, hemoglobin ≥ 9.0, platelets ≥ 100,000, adequate organ function, and ECOG performance status 0–2, and provided informed consent. Pts received fludarabine 25 mg/m2 IV on day 1–5 and rituximab 375 mg/m2 on day 1 every 28 days for up to 6 cycles. The planned dose escalation of flavopiridol was 50 mg/m2 by 1-hr IV bolus on day 1 (cohort 1), day 1–2 (cohort 2), or day 1–3 (cohort 3) of each cycle. Pts were placed on prophylactic Bactrim and Valtrex. Growth factor support was prohibited. Twenty-one pts were enrolled and are evaluable for toxicity and response. Median age was 62 years (range, 43–81), and 10 pts were male. Pts had the following diagnoses: CLL (8), MCL (5), follicular lymphoma (FL; 4), small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL; 3), and lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma (1). Nine pts had received 1-2 prior therapies; 12 pts were previously untreated. CLL pts were Rai stage III/IV (5) or required treatment for Rai stage I/II disease (3) by NCI 96 criteria. NHL pts were stage III/IV (10) or had progressive stage II disease (3). Three pts were treated in cohort 1, and dose limiting toxicity (DLT) was not observed. Six pts were treated in cohort 2. Two pts developed DLT; 1 pt developed grade 3 confusion and grade 3 seizures, and 1 pt developed nausea and diarrhea resulting in grade 3 acute renal failure. Three pts in cohort 2 did not receive flavopiridol after cycles 2, 2 and 3, due to life threatening tumor lysis in our single agent flavopiridol study. Twelve additional pts were enrolled at the cohort 1 dose level, to better define toxicity and efficacy. Pts received a median of 4 cycles (range 1–6), and 9 of 21 pts completed all 6 planned cycles. Therapy was stopped early due to cytopenias (7), infection (2), DLT (2) or progressive disease (1). One patient who received only 2 cycles of FFR due to cytopenias subsequently received 4 cycles of fludarabine and rituximab from his local oncologist. Response was graded by NCI 96 criteria (CLL) or IWG criteria (NHL). Overall response rate (ORR) was 90%; 15 pts achieved CR (71%), and 4 pts achieved PR (19%). Six pts relapsed a median of 7.5 months (range 4–18) after completing therapy; 13 pts remain in remission a median of 11 months (range 4–23) after completing therapy. Of note, all 9 MCL/FL pts responded (8 CR, 1 PR), and 8 pts remain in remission a median of 15 months (6–23) after finishing therapy. In conclusion, FFR exhibited significant clinical activity in a small group of pts, but cytopenias limited the administration of therapy. We are currently studying a modified FFR regimen administering a more active flavopiridol schedule (30-min IV bolus followed by 4-hr IV infusion) and allowing the use of prophylactic filgrastim, prior to phase II clinical study.

Flavopiridol, Fludarabine and Rituximab (FFR): An Active Regimen in Indolent B-Cell Lymphoproliferative Disorders and Mantle Cell Lymphoma.

Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 1571-1571 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas S. Lin ◽  
Beth Fischer ◽  
Kristie A. Blum ◽  
Pierluigi Porcu ◽  
Eric H. Kraut ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
B Cell ◽  
Mantle Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Mantle Cell ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Background: The cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor flavopiridol (alvocidib) induces p53-independent apoptosis and may be able to eliminate tumor cells resistant to fludarabine and rituximab. Study Design and Treatment: We report final results of a phase I dose escalation study of flavopiridol in combination with fludarabine and rituximab (FFR) in patients (pts) with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), indolent B-cell non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (B-NHL) and chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Pts had ANC 3 1500, hemoglobin 3 9.0, platelets 3 100,000, adequate organ function, and ECOG performance status 0–2, and provided informed consent. Pts received fludarabine 25 mg/m2 IV on day 1–5 and rituximab 375 mg/m2 on day 1 every 28 days for up to 6 cycles. Flavopiridol was administered 50 mg/m2 by 1-hr IV bolus on day 1 (cohort 1, n=15) or day 1 and 2 (cohort 2, n=6) of each cycle. Based on promising results with a novel single agent dosing schedule in CLL, the study was amended to give flavopiridol by 30-min IV bolus followed by 4-hr IV infusion at a dose of 20 mg/m2 + 20 mg/m2 (cohort 3, n=3) or 30 mg/m2 + 30 mg/m2 (cohort 4, n=14) beginning with cycle 2. Pts were placed on prophylactic Bactrim and Valtrex. Growth factor support was allowed in cohorts 3 and 4. Results: Thirty-eight pts were enrolled. Median age was 62 years (range, 38–81), and 22 pts were male (58%). Pts had CLL (11), MCL (10), follicular (FL, 9), small lymphocytic (3), marginal zone (4) or lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma (1). Sixteen pts had received 1 or 2 prior therapies; 22 pts were previously untreated. Two of 6 pts in cohort 2 developed dose limiting toxicity; 1 pt developed grade 3 confusion and grade 3 seizures, and 1 pt developed nausea and diarrhea resulting in grade 3 acute renal failure. Fifteen pts were enrolled in cohort 1 and 14 pts were enrolled in cohort 4, to better define toxicity and efficacy. Pts received a median of 4 cycles (range 1–6), and 16 of 38 pts completed all 6 planned cycles. Cytopenias (10), fatigue (3), fever (2) and progression (2) were the most common reasons for early discontinuation of therapy. Response was graded by NCI 96 criteria (CLL) or IWG criteria (NHL). Overall response rate (ORR) was 82% (CR 50%, CRu 5%, PR 26%). Median progression-free survival (PFS) of responders was 25.5 months. ORR (82% vs. 81%), CR (50% vs. 50%) and median PFS (25.7 vs. 25.1 months) were similar for previously untreated and relapsed pts. Thirteen pts remain in remission with a median PFS of 33.5 months (range, 17.5–59.5), and 3 other pts died of unrelated causes. Eight of 10 MCL pts (median age 68, range 62–81) responded (7 CR, 1 PR). Two responders with blastoid variant MCL relapsed within 1 year, but median PFS of the other 6 responding MCL pts was 33.5 months. All 9 FL pts responded (5 CR, 2 CRu, 2 PR) with a median PFS of 25.1 months (range, 4.0–46.3). Conclusions: FFR exhibited significant clinical activity in indolent B-NHL, MCL and CLL. FFR was effective in both relapsed and previously untreated pts and showed promising clinical activity in older MCL pts. Changing from 1-hr IV bolus dosing to 30- min IV bolus followed by 4-hr IV infusion did not improve the response rate, suggesting that 1-hr IV bolus dosing may be effective when flavopiridol is given as part of combination chemotherapy. This regimen warrants further study.

Lenalidomide and Rituximab Are a Promising Combination in Vitro, in Vivo Preclinically and in a Phase I/II Clinical Trial in Relapsed/Refractory Mantle Cell Lymphoma

Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 3058-3058
Author(s):  
Michael Wang ◽  
Liang Zhang ◽  
Luis Fayad ◽  
Fredrick Hagemeister ◽  
Sattva Neelapu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Mantle Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Dosage Level ◽  
Toxicity Profile ◽  
Mantle Cell ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Relapsed/refractory mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is difficult to treat. Rituximab (R) targets CD20 antigen on the surface of MCL cells while lenalidomide (Len) may target the microenvironment of MCL cells and enhance the antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) activity of R. To test this hypothesis, we initiated preclinical studies and a phase I/II clinical trial. In the preclinical study we found that Len and R induced growth inhibition and apoptosis of both cultured and fresh primary MCL cells. Len enhanced R-induced apoptosis via upregulating phosphorylation of c-Jun N-terminal protein kinases (JNK), Bcl-2, Bad; increasing release of cytochrome-c; enhancing activation of caspase-3, -8, -9 and cleavage of PARP. Daily treatment with Len increased NK cells by 10 times in SCID mice. The combination of Len and R decreased tumor burden and prolonged survival of MCL-bearing SCID mice. In the phase I/II clinical trial, Eligible patients (pts) with MCL had 1–4 lines of prior therapies. Treatment consisted of Len given orally daily on days 1–21 of a 28-day cycle and R 375 mg/m2 by IV infusion weekly for 4 weeks only during the first cycle with the first dose on Day 1 in Cycle 1. A standard 3+3 dose escalation was used to determine MTD with Len doses at 10 mg, 15 mg, 20 mg, and 25 mg. Detailed toxicity profile in phase I was reported previously (Wang et al, ASH 2007). Two DLT s occurred at 25 mg including 1 grade 3 hypercalcemia and 1 grade 4 non-neutropenic fever during the first cycle. Six patients from phase 1 were at 20 mg dosage level. One patient from phase 1 was initially at 25 mg dosage level and was subsequently reduced to 20 mg dosage level due to DLT. Eight patients have been enrolled in the phase II trial at MTD. In the 14 patients evaluated at 20 mg dosage level in phase II, median age was 68 (51–77); median prior therapies were 2 (1–4); median cycles received to date were 4 (range 2–26). Grade 3/4 hematologic toxic events included neutropenia (35), febrile neutropenia (2), and thrombocytopenia (11). There was no grade 3–4 anemia. Grade 3 non-hematologic toxic events included fatigue (2) and myalgia (1). Fourteen pts at MTD (20 mg) including 7 in phase I plus 7 in phase II were evaluable for response. Eight out of 14 pts achieved responses including 4 CRs, 4 PR s, 2 SD and 4 PD s. Conclusions: Lenalidomide in combination with rituximab provided a synergistically therapeutic effect on mantle cell lymphoma cells by enhancement of apoptosis and R-dependent NK cell-mediated cytotoxicity preclinically. Lenalidomide plus rituximab showed early evidence of response with a very favorable toxicity profile in a phase I/II clinical trial. Updated information will be presented at the conference.

A Multi-Center Phase II Study (SAKK 36/06) of Single Agent Everolimus (RAD001) In Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Mantle Cell Lymphoma.

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 2803-2803 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christoph Renner ◽  
Pier Luigi Zinzani ◽  
Remy Gressin ◽  
Dirk Klingbiel ◽  
Laurence Favet ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cyclin D1 ◽  
Mantle Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Response Duration ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Mantle Cell

Abstract Abstract 2803 Introduction: Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) accounts for 6% of all B-cell lymphomas and remains incurable for most patients. Those who relapse after first line therapy or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation have a dismal prognosis with short response duration after salvage therapy. On a molecular level, MCL is characterised by the translocation t[11;14] leading to Cyclin D1 overexpression. Cyclin D1 is downstream of the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) kinase and can be effectively blocked by mTOR inhibitors such as temsirolimus. We set out to define the single agent activity of the orally available mTOR inhibitor everolimus (RAD001) in a prospective, multi-centre trial in patients with relapsed or refractory MCL (NCT00516412). The study was performed in collaboration with the EU-MCL network. Methods: Eligible patients with histologically/cytologically confirmed relapsed (not more than 3 prior lines of systemic treatment) or refractory MCL received everolimus 10 mg orally daily on day 1 – 28 of each cycle (4 weeks) for 6 cycles or until disease progression. The primary endpoint was the best objective response with adverse reactions, time to progression (TTP), time to treatment failure, response duration and molecular response as secondary endpoints. A response rate of ≤ 10% was considered uninteresting and, conversely, promising if ≥ 30%. The required sample size was 35 pts using the Simon's optimal two-stage design with 90% power and 5% significance. Results: A total of 36 patients with 35 evaluable patients from 19 centers were enrolled between August 2007 and January 2010. The median age was 69.4 years (range 40.1 to 84.9 years), with 22 males and 13 females. Thirty patients presented with relapsed and 5 with refractory MCL with a median of two prior therapies. Treatment was generally well tolerated with anemia (11%), thrombocytopenia (11%), neutropenia (8%), diarrhea (3%) and fatigue (3%) being the most frequent complications of CTC grade III or higher. Eighteen patients received 6 or more cycles of everolimus treatment. The objective response rate was 20% (95% CI: 8–37%) with 2 CR, 5 PR, 17 SD, and 11 PD. At a median follow-up of 6 months, TTP was 5.45 months (95% CI: 2.8–8.2 months) for the entire population and 10.6 months for the 18 patients receiving 6 or more cycles of treatment. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that single agent everolimus 10 mg once daily orally is well tolerated. The null hypothesis of inactivity could be rejected indicating a moderate anti-lymphoma activity in relapsed/refractory MCL. Further studies of either everolimus in combination with chemotherapy or as single agent for maintenance treatment are warranted in MCL. Disclosures: Off Label Use: everolimus for the treatment of mantle cell lymphoma.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document