Favorable Outcomes of Acute Leukemia of Ambiguous Lineage Treated with Hypercvad: A Multi-Center Retrospective Study

Abstract Background: Acute leukemias of ambiguous lineage (ALAL), including acute undifferentiated leukemia and mixed phenotype acute leukemia (MPAL), are rare hematologic malignancies, accounting for only 2-5% of cases of acute leukemia. Outcomes are generally poor, and retrospective studies have suggested that patients have better outcomes when treated with regimens used for acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) rather than acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Due to heterogeneous definitions and rarity of these leukemias, no single ALL regimen has been studied extensively. Hyperfractionated cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin, and dexamethasone (hyperCVAD) is one of the most widely used adult ALL regimens in the United States. We retrospectively examined the effectiveness of this regimen as initial therapy in patients with ALAL. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed records from adult patients treated initially with hyperCVAD-based chemotherapy for ALAL as defined by the World Health Organization at five academic institutions. Only patients whose diagnosis was verified at a participating institution were examined. Philadelphia (Ph) chromosome-positive ALAL patients treated concurrently with tyrosine kinase inhibitors were included. The primary objective of the study was to determine the overall response rate (ORR) and median overall survival (OS). Descriptive statistics were used for baseline characteristics and responses, and Kaplan-Meier estimates were used to calculate all time-to-event outcomes. Results: Twenty-two patients were identified, and pre-treatment characteristics are shown in the Table. Median age was 50 years (range, 22-69), with an even distribution of male and female patients (50% each). The majority (77%) were Caucasian. Two patients (9%) had acute undifferentiated leukemia, 11 (50%) T/myeloid MPAL, 8 (36%) B/myeloid MPAL, and 1 (5%) B/T MPAL. Seven (32%) had a complex karyotype (at least 3 abnormalities), 6 (27%) had a normal karyotype, 3 (14%) were Ph-positive and were treated concurrently with dasatinib, and 1 (5%) had an 11q23 rearrangement. FLT3-ITD was detected in 5 of 8 patients (63%) with an available mutation panel. Three (15%) had central nervous system (CNS) involvement at presentation, and one additional patient developed CNS disease during the course of therapy. There were no deaths within the first 30 days, and the median number of cycles given was 4 (range, 1-8). The CR rate was 73% (n=16) and an additional 14% (n=3) had CR with incomplete count recovery (CRi), for an ORR rate of 86%. One patient had a partial response, and 2 patients had no response. Of the 19 patients achieving CR or CRi, median number of cycles to CR was 1.5, and 12 (63%) proceeded to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT). Of the 7 responders who did not receive alloHSCT, 3 relapsed shortly after initial CR and 4 are alive and in remission 77, 39, 37 and 10 months from treatment initiation. All 3 patients with Ph-positive disease achieved CR. Only 1 proceeded with alloHSCT and all 3 patients are alive and in remission at 51, 39, and 10 months. With a median follow up of 37 months, 14 (64%) patients were alive and in remission, including 11 who had undergone alloHSCT. Four of the 6 patients who died had a complex karyotype. Median overall survival for the entire cohort was not reached (Figure). Conclusions: HyperCVAD results in high remission rates in patients with ALAL, with low incidence of early mortality and high ability to proceed to allogeneic transplantation following response. HyperCVAD can be considered an effective front-line therapy for patients with ALAL. Additionally, hyperCVAD may be a backbone for incorporation of novel immunotherapies and targeted therapies, which may improve results in patients with appropriate targets. Disclosures Sweet: Astellas: Consultancy; Agios: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Jazz: Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Agios: Consultancy; Celgene: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Honoraria; Phizer: Consultancy; Jazz: Speakers Bureau; Astellas: Consultancy; Phizer: Consultancy; BMS: Honoraria. Wang:Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Jazz: Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy. Al-Kali:Novartis: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Minimal Residual Disease Eradication with Venetoclax in Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2020-134237 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 12-14

Author(s):

Alexander Coltoff ◽

Joseph G. Jurcic ◽

Peter Campbell ◽

Daniel J. Lee ◽

Mark L Heaney ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Overall Survival ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Median Overall Survival ◽

Residual Disease ◽

Institutional Research ◽

Negative Group ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Research Grants

Introduction The combination of the BCL-2 inhibitor venetoclax with an HMA (HMA/Ven) has improved outcomes in previously untreated patients with AML not eligible for intensive induction therapy. In a phase Ib study, 67% of patients achieved a complete remission (CR) or CR with incomplete recovery of blood counts (CRi) with a median overall survival (OS) of 17.5 months (DiNardo CD et al. Blood 2019; 133(1):7-17). HMA/Ven has also demonstrated efficacy in a heavily pretreated population with relapsed or refractory (R/R) AML, the majority of whom had prior HMA exposure (DiNardo CD et al. Am J Hematol 2018; 93(3):401-7). Measurable residual disease (MRD) is recognized as an independent prognostic indicator important for risk stratification and treatment planning (Schuurhuis GJ et al. Blood 2018; 131(12):1275-91). To date, however, there have been few reports on the effect of HMA/Ven on MRD. Methods This is a retrospective case series of patients with AML at a single-center tertiary-care institution. Patients ≥ 18 years of age who were treated with HMA/Ven between January 2017 and June 2020, either in the upfront or salvage setting, for AML were included. Outcomes included CR/CRi rate, MRD response, relapse free survival (RFS), and OS. MRD was assessed via multicolor flow cytometry with a sensitivity of 10-3 (0.1%). Results Nineteen patients were identified, 12 (63%) of whom were female. The median age at the time of HMA/Ven initiation was 71 years (range, 21 - 87 years). Ten (53%) patients had de novo AML and 9 had secondary or therapy-related AML. By 2017 ELN criteria, 3 (16%) patients had favorable-risk, 9 (47%) had intermediate-risk, and 7 (37%) had adverse-risk AML. Nine (47%) patients had R/R AML; 5 received HMA/Ven as first salvage therapy, and 4 as 2nd or greater salvage. Three (16%) patients had prior HMA exposure. No patient had prior venetoclax exposure. Median follow-up was 9.1 months (range, 1-21.1 months). Ten (53%) patients received azacitidine and 9 (47%) were given decitabine. Venetoclax doses ranged from 50 to 400 mg daily, depending on participation in a clinical trial and concomitant medications. Eight patients achieved a CR and 7 patients achieved a CRi for a combined CR/CRi rate of 79%. The CR/CRi rate was 90% (9/10) in the upfront setting, and 66% (6/9) in the salvage setting. The median time and number of cycles to best clinical response was 2.3 months (range, 0.9-3.9 months) and 2 (range, 1-3 cycles), respectively. Eleven (73%) of the 15 responders achieved MRD clearance after a median of 2 cycles (range, 1-3 cycles) (Table 1). Two of 4 (50%) MRD-positive patients relapsed, while 4 (36%) of 11 MRD-negative patients relapsed (Figure 1). Relapse occurred at a median of 2.0 months (range, 1.3-2.7 months) in the MRD positive group and 11.0 months (range, 2.8-14 months) in the MRD negative group. One patient died of infectious complications while MRD negative. Three patients, all of whom were treated for R/R disease, proceeded to an allogeneic stem cell transplant (HSCT). Two were MRD negative at the time of HSCT and all remained in remission. At the time of data cutoff, 7 (64%) of 11 MRD-negative patients were alive, and all 4 MRD-positive patients were alive. Causes of death in the MRD-negative group included disease relapse (3 patients) and infection (1 patient). Median overall survival in the entire cohort (range, 32 days-NR) was not reached. Conclusions HMA/Ven was highly effective as both upfront and salvage therapy. Surprisingly, the salvage CR/CRi rate in this series was 66%, allowing half of the responders to proceed to HSCT. The majority (73%) of responders achieved MRD negativity. While MRD status influenced RFS, 36% of MRD-negative patients relapsed. Additionally, the same percentage of MRD-negative patients died during follow-up, versus none of the patients with MRD-positivity. This indicates the need for more sensitive methods to assess MRD and for novel therapeutic strategies to eliminate MRD, thereby improving long-term outcomes. Larger prospective studies are needed to define the role of MRD assessment with venetoclax-containing regimens. Disclosures Jurcic: AbbVie:Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding;Celgene:Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding;Syros Pharmaceuticals:Research Funding;PTC Therapeutics:Research Funding;Arog Pharmaceuticals:Research Funding;Kura Oncology:Research Funding;Forma Therapeutics:Research Funding;Astellas:Research Funding;Genentech:Research Funding;Novartis:Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Daiichi-Sankyo:Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding;BMS:Consultancy, Research Funding.Campbell:AstraZeneca:Consultancy.Lee:Genentech:Research Funding;Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma Oncology, Inc.:Research Funding;AbbVie:Research Funding;Novartis:Research Funding;Bayer:Research Funding;Celgene:Consultancy;Forty Seven:Research Funding.Heaney:Blueprint Medicines Corporation:Research Funding;BMS:Research Funding;CTI Biopharma:Consultancy, Research Funding;Deciphera:Research Funding;Incyte:Research Funding;Novartis:Consultancy, Research Funding;Sierra Oncology:Research Funding;AbbVie:Consultancy;Partner Therapeutics:Consultancy.Lamanna:Janssen:Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Octapharma:Research Funding;Juno:Other: Institutional research grants, Research Funding;Gilead:Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Astra Zeneca:Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Institutional research grants, Research Funding;Pharmacyclics:Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Genentech:Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Institutional research grants, Research Funding;Bei-Gene:Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Institutional research grants, Research Funding;Abbvie:Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Institutional research grants, Research Funding;Oncternal, Verastem, TG Therapeutics:Other: Institutional research grants, Research Funding;MingSight:Other: Institutional research grants, Research Funding;Loxo:Research Funding;Celgene:Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Columbia University Medical Center:Current Employment.

Download Full-text

Long-Term Responders after Brentuximab Vedotin: Experience on 57 Patients with Relapsed and Refractory Hodgkin and Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v126.23.2725.2725 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 126 (23) ◽

pp. 2725-2725 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Pier Luigi Zinzani ◽

Letizia Gandolfi ◽

Beatrice Casadei ◽

Cinzia Pellegrini ◽

Alessandro Broccoli ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Overall Survival ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Cell Lymphoma ◽

Large Cell ◽

Median Number ◽

Brentuximab Vedotin ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Large Cell Lymphoma

Abstract Brentuximab vedotin (BV) is an antibody drug-conjugate targeting CD30 linked to monomethyl auristatin E. Several studies have shown the efficacy of BV in patients with refractory or relapsed Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) and systemic anaplastic large cell lymphoma (sALCL). We reviewed our clinical database to evaluate the long-term efficacy of this treatment. From July 2009 to February 2015, 57 patients were treated with BV in our Institute: 43 with a diagnosis of HL and 14 with sALCL. Thirty-six were males and 21 were females, with a median age of 33 years (range 16-77). All of them had been heavily pretreated before BV with a median number of previous therapies of 3 (range 2-10). Thirty-nine had refractory disease and 18 were relapsed. Autologous stem cells transplantation had failed in 30 patients. BV was administered at a dosage of 1.8 mg/mq, every 21 days, for a maximum of 16 cycles. The median number of cycles was 8 (range 2-16); 13 patients completed the entire schedule. The best overall response rate was globally 57,8% (33 of 57 patients), including 25 (43.8%) complete responses (CR): 18 with HL and 7 with sALCL. At present, 20/25 (80%) patients are still in continuous CR (CCR) with a median follow up of 9 months (range 3-41): 10 of them have consolidated the response with a stem cell transplantation (SCT) (4 auto-SCT and 6 allo-SCT) and 10 patients have remained in CR without any other therapy after BV. Among these long-term responders without any consolidation (7 patients with HL and 3 with sALCL), the median follow-up is 12 months (range 3-37); in particular there are 3 patients in CCR after at least 24 months. The global overall survival rate at 68 months is 71% (no patients with sALCL dead) and the median overall survival has not been reached yet. The global progression-free survival rate at 48 months is 30%, the median is achieved at 11,7 months. Toxicity was primarily neurological with peripheral sensory symptoms (30%) and motor neuropathy (5%); the majority was grade 3 in severity (8 patients). This study confirms the safety and the high efficacy of BV that can be considered an effective treatment in patients with relapsed or refractory HL or sALCL. This drug can induce a durable complete response representing a "bridge" to auto-SCT or allo-SCT. However our data show a subset of patients that can be considered "long-term responders", who have remained in CCR without any consolidation after BV. Disclosures Zinzani: Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; J&J: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Cavo:Janssen: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Honoraria; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria.

Download Full-text

Acute Leukemia and High-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes in HIV-Positive Patients: 25-Years' Experience of the Rete Ematologica Lombarda (REL)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-125288 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 3603-3603 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Chiara Cattaneo ◽

Massimo Bernardi ◽

Valentina Mancini ◽

Chiara Pagani ◽

Monica Fumagalli ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Stem Cell ◽

High Risk ◽

Stem Cell Transplantation ◽

Acute Leukemia ◽

Hiv Infection ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Cell Transplantation ◽

Hiv Positive ◽

Complex Karyotype ◽

Advisory Committees

Introduction. Acute leukemia (AL) and high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (HR-MDS) are relatively uncommon among HIV-positive (HIV-pos) patients (pts) and epidemiologic studies are very limited. A dismal outcome for these patients has been reported in the past; however more recently an improvement of prognosis was observed using intensive approaches, such as allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT) (Kwon, AIDS 2019). In order to better define the clinical characteristics of AL/HR-MDS HIV-pos pts, the feasibility of any specific treatment and the outcome in this setting, we evaluated all HIV-pos AL and HR-MDS pts diagnosed at 5 Hematology Centers participating to Rete Ematologica Lombarda (REL). Patients and Methods. We asked to the Centers to retrospectively report all cases of HIV-pos adult pts with AL or HR-MDS. We sent a database asking information about the characteristics of hematological disease, HIV infection, therapy, toxicities and outcome of pts. AL and MDS were classified according to WHO classification. The response to therapy was defined by European Leukemia Net criteria. Results. Between 1994 and 2019, 23 pts have been retrieved: 3 affected by HR-MDS, 15 by acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and 5 by acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Median age at AL/MDS diagnosis was 49y (range 28-67), M/F ratio 17/6. Median CD4 count was 336/mcl (range 50-2048). HIV infection was antecedent to AL/MDS diagnosis in 20/21 evaluable cases, with a median duration of 115 months (range 0-396); these pts were already on HAART at AL/MDS diagnosis. In 6 (29%) pts AIDS was also documented (1 Kaposi sarcoma, 1 P. jirovecii pneumonia and 4 non Hodgkin B-cell lymphoma). Six (30%) of the 20 evaluable cases had an adverse cytogenetics (complex karyotype), while only 1 pt showed a favorable karyotype (inv16). NPM1 mutation was observed in 2 AML cases, FLT3 ITD and p53 mutation in 1 case each. No bcr/abl rearrangement was observed in ALL cases. Three pts (13%) did not receive any treatment due to poor performance status (1 ALL, 2 AML) and died of progressive disease after a median of 2 months (mo, 0.5-2). Two HR-MDS pts received azacytidine but they rapidly progressed after 2 courses and died at +7 and +8mo respectively. Eighteen pts were treated with intensive therapy: 17 underwent induction chemotherapy (cht) and 1 alloSCT upfront. All the pts received HAART during AL/MDS treatment. Eleven out of the 17 pts (65%) receiving induction cht achieved a complete remission (CR); 4 pts received further induction cht, which was successful in 2/4 (50%) the overall CR rate being therefore 76.5%. A further pt received venetoclax+azacytidine as fourth-line treatment and achieved a morphological CR. Ten pts (9 AML and 1 HR-MDS) underwent stem cell transplantation at first-line: 3 autologous (ASCT) and 7 allogeneic. Overall 5 out of 13 (38%) pts achieving CR after induction cht relapsed; only one of the 5 receiving salvage treatment achieved a durable CR and proceeded to salvage alloSCT. Five pts (22%) died of toxicity: 2 (1 P, jirovecii pneumonia and 1 septic shock) during induction cht (2/17, 12%), 1 during aplastic phase after ASCT (hemorrhagic stroke), 2 after alloSCT (1 aGVHD, 1 infection); overall, SCT therapy-related morality was 3/10 (30%). After a median follow up of 21mo, 10 pts are alive in CR, with a median overall survival (OS) of 17mo and a 2y OS of 41.2±22.7SEM. A trend for a better OS was observed in pts with AL/HR-MDS diagnosis in the last years (2y OS: 2011-2019: 64.2% vs 1994-2010 27.3%, p=0.12) (Fig.1), even if median age was significantly higher in the second period (55.5y vs 44.5y, p=0.02). A complex karyotype was predictive of poor outcome in pts evaluable for cytogenetics (45% vs 10%, p=0.04), whereas no correlation between age, CD4 count, HIV duration and OS was observed. Conclusions. Intensive chemotherapy and stem cell transplantation are feasible and effective in AL/HR-MDS HIV-pos pts, with an acceptable toxicity profile, similar to the HIV-neg counterpart. The more frequent curative intent approach to AL HIV-pos pts is probably the main responsible for the improved survival in the last years also in the elderly; antiviral, antibiotic and antifungal prophylactic strategy, together with a prompt diagnosis and a careful management of infectious events, should be carefully considered in this setting of pts. HIV infection responsive to HAART should no longer be considered a contraindication to standard AL/HR-MDS treatment. Disclosures Rossi: Sandoz: Honoraria; Daiichi-Sankyo: Consultancy; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astellas: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria; Mundipharma: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria.

Download Full-text

Overall Survival in Patients with JAK2 and ASXL1 Positive Myeloproliferative Neoplasms

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-128309 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 5383-5383

Author(s):

Murtadha Al-Khabori ◽

Shoaib Al-Zadjali ◽

Iman Al Noumani ◽

Khalil Al Farsi ◽

Salam Al-Kindi ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Overall Survival ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Myeloproliferative Neoplasms ◽

Prognostic Significance ◽

Jak2 V617f ◽

World Health ◽

Prognostic Impact ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Myeloid Neoplasms ◽

The Impact

Objectives: Mutations in additional sex combs-like transcriptional regulator 1 (ASXL1) have been previously described in myeloid neoplasms (21% in non-Myeloproliferative [MPN; Tefferi A, Leukemia, 2010) and have been associated with a more aggressive disease [Rocquain J et al, BMC Cacer, 2010]. They can also be found in patients with JAK2 positive MPN [Abdel-Wahab O et al, Cancer Research, 2010). Disruption of ASXL1 gene leads to MPN phenotype in zebrafish model (Gjini E, Dis Model Mech, 2019). The co-expression and the prognostic significance of ASXL1 in patients with JAK2 positive MPN are not yet fully defined. We therefore planned to define the prognostic impact of ASXL1 mutations on the Overall Survival (OS) of patients with JAK2 positive MPN. Methods: We included patients with JAK2 V617F positive MPN diagnosed according to the World Health Organization 2016 criteria and treated at the three largest hematology centers in Oman. The entire coding region of ASXL1 gene was sequenced using Next Generation Sequencing (NGS; Ion PGM Sequencer; Thermo Fisher Scientific®). The library was constructed and the templates were prepared using the PGM tool and the variants were annotated using the ClinVar database and the prediction from the Scale-Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT) and or Polymorphism Phenotyping (Polyphen) algorithms. The NGS analysis was done on the frozen diagnostic bone marrow samples. The survival probability was estimated using Kaplan-Meier estimator and Cox regression was used to assess the impact of predictors on the OS outcome. An alpha threshold of 0.05 was used. The R program (version 3.1.2) was used for all statistical analyses. Results: A total of 58 patients with JAK2 V617F positive MPN were included. All of these patients were found to have mutated ASXL1 using the NGS (ASXL1 p.Leu815Pro was found in all patients). The median age of this cohort was 62 years (InterQuartile Range [IQR]: 44 - 70) and female to male ratio was 25:33. The median hemoglobin, hematocrit, white blood cell count and platelet count was 14.7 g/dL, 58%, 11.5 x109/L and 518 x109/L respectively. Out of the 58 patients included, 28 had polycythemia vera, 20 had essential thrombocythemia, 8 had myelofibrosis and 2 had MPN-Unclassified. The median time from diagnosis to last follow up or death was 13 months (IQR: 3-39). During this period, 5 patients died. The probability of OS at 3 years was 88%. The median OS was not reached. In the univariable analysis, age was a statistically significant predictor of OS (p = 0.0355) but not gender (p = 0.434) and MPN subtype (p = 0.7). In the multivariable analysis model of the previous three factors, age remained statistically significant (Hazard ratio = 1.13, p = 0.041). Conclusions: ASXL1 is mutated in high proportion of patients with JAK2 positive MPN. Despite the negative impact of ASXL1 in patients with non-MPN myeloid neoplasms, the patients with combined positivity of JAK2 and ASXL1 in this study had a very good OS probability. Age was a predictor of OS in the univariable and multivariable models. We recommend the development and the assessment of ASXL1 inhibitors as therapeutic strategies in patients with MPN. Disclosures Al-Khabori: Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; NovoNardisk: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Servier: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Shire (Takeda): Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; SOBI: Honoraria; AstraZeneca: Honoraria; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Influence of Karyotype On Overall Survival in Patients with Higher-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome Treated with Azacitidine or a Conventional Care Regimen.

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v114.22.1755.1755 ◽

2009 ◽

Vol 114 (22) ◽

pp. 1755-1755 ◽

Cited By ~ 5

Author(s):

Ghulam J Mufti ◽

Steven D. Gore ◽

Valeria Santini ◽

Pierre Fenaux ◽

Lewis R. Silverman ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Overall Survival ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Conventional Care ◽

Complex Karyotype ◽

Trisomy 8 ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Cytogenetic Abnormalities ◽

Equity Ownership

Abstract Abstract 1755 Poster Board I-781 Background Karyotypic abnormalities are common in myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), and specific chromosomal abnormalities are associated with poor prognosis. The phase III AZA-001 study (Lancet Oncol, 2009) showed azacitidine (AZA) prolonged overall survival (OS) regardless of IPSS cytogenetic risk category. This analysis assessed the effects of specific cytogenetic abnormalities on OS in patient (pt) subgroups treated with AZA or a conventional care regimen (CCR). Methods Pts with higher-risk MDS (FAB RAEB, RAEB-t, or CMML and IPSS Int-2 or High) were enrolled and randomized to receive AZA or CCR. CCR comprised 3 treatments: best supportive care only, low-dose ara-C, or induction chemotherapy. Erythropoietins were prohibited. OS was determined in subgroups of pts with del 5/5q-, del 7/7q-, or trisomy 8, each as part of a non-complex karyotype (<3 cytogenetic abnormalities) or as part of a complex karyotype (≥3 cytogenetic abnormalities). OS was also analyzed in pts with combinations of del 5/5q- and/or del 7/7q- as part of non-complex or complex karyotypes (Table). Pt karyotype was determined at baseline. OS was assessed using Kaplan-Meier methods. A stratified Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and associated 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results A total of 358 pts were enrolled (AZA 179, CCR 179). Of them, 153 had normal karyotypes (AZA 77, CCR 76). Median OS in pts with normal karyotypes was not reached at 21.1 months with AZA vs 17.2 months (95%CI: 15.2 – 24.1 months) with CCR; HR = 0.63 (95%CI: 0.39 – 1.03). Of remaining pts, 136 had del 5/5q-, del 7/7q-, and/or trisomy 8 as part of a non-complex or complex karyotype. AZA was associated with longer OS vs CCR in all subgroups of pts with non-complex cytogenetics, with HRs ranging from 0.20 (95%CI: 0.06 – 0.65) to 0.51 (95%CI: 0.05 – 4.74) (Table). In both the AZA and CCR treatment groups, pts in all subgroups with non-complex karyotypes had substantially longer OS than pts with complex karyotypes. Pts with complex karyotypes in some subgroups had longer OS with AZA vs CCR: median OS in pts with del 5/5q-, del 5/5q- WITHOUT del 7/7q-, or trisomy 8 as part of a complex karyotype treated with AZA survived 5.1, 8.0, and 12.4 months longer, respectively, than their counterparts who received CCR. HRs with AZA vs CCR in pts with complex cytogenetics ranged from 0.42 (95%CI: 0.10 – 1.69) to 0.55 (95%CI: 0.29 – 1.05). Conclusions These findings support earlier data showing effectiveness of AZA in higher-risk MDS pts with complex or non-complex karyotypes. Major gains in OS were obtained with AZA vs CCR (12-18 months longer OS with AZA) for the following categories: del 7/7q- (non-complex), del 7/7q- WITHOUT del 5/5q- (non-complex), and trisomy 8 (non-complex and complex). Pts with trisomy 8 treated with AZA experienced a 3-fold increase in median OS compared with similar pts who received CCR. Longer OS (AZA 15.3 vs CCR 7.3 months) was also obtained for pts with del5/5q- WITHOUT del7/7q- as part of a complex karyotype. The worse cytogenetic categories, del 7/7q- and del 5/5q- AND del 7/7q-, both with complex karyotype, were associated with the poorest OS regardless of treatment. Pt subgroups in this post hoc analysis were small and heterogeneous; confirmation of these findings in larger pt samples is warranted. Disclosures Mufti: Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Gore:Celgene: Consultancy, Equity Ownership, Research Funding; Johnson & Johnson: Research Funding. Santini:Celgene: Honoraria. Fenaux:Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Ortho Biotech: Honoraria, Research Funding; Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Cephalon: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; MSD: Honoraria, Research Funding; Epicept: Honoraria, Research Funding. Skikne:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Hellstrom-Lindberg:Celgene: Research Funding. Seymour:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Beach:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Backstrom:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Fernando:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership.

Download Full-text

Is Intermediate-Dose Cytarabine a Good Control for Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia?

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v128.22.3991.3991 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 128 (22) ◽

pp. 3991-3991 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Sarah Bertoli ◽

Noemie Gadaud ◽

Suzanne Tavitian ◽

Audrey Sarry ◽

Emilie Bérard ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Overall Survival ◽

Complete Remission ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Median Overall Survival ◽

Daily Practice ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Salvage Regimen ◽

Platelet Recovery ◽

Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Refractory Diseases

Abstract Intermediate dose cytarabine (IDAC) defined by daily intravenous bolus of 1g/m² during 5 days has been recently defined as the standard control arm in phase 3 placebo-controlled randomized trials for patients with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia (R/R AML). In these trials assessing clofarabine/IDAC (CLASSIC-1 study, Faderl S et al., JCO 2012) or vosaroxin/IDAC (VALOR study, Ravandi F. et al., Lancet Oncol 2015) vs placebo/IDAC, complete remission rates and median overall survival with placebo/IDAC were 17.8%/18.9% and 6.3/6.1 months in the CLASSIC-1 and VALOR studies, respectively. However, the dose-intensity of this IDAC regimen remains questioned in routine practice since many centers still use higher doses of cytarabine often in combination with an anthracycline and a third drug including fludarabine, etoposide or gemtuzumab ozogamycin (FLAG-ida, MEC or MIDAM regimen for example) although these regimen have proved little efficacy and higher toxicity. We assessed the outcome of R/R AML patients that fulfilled main VALOR inclusion criteria consecutively treated in our center with intensive salvage regimen. All patients with a diagnosis of AML in first relapse or with refractory disease were eligible for this study. Acute promyelocytic leukemia were excluded. Relapse was defined as re-emergence of at least 5% leukemia blasts in bone marrow or at least 1% blasts in peripheral blood 90 days to 24 months after first complete remission or complete remission with incomplete platelet recovery. Refractory AML was defined as persistent disease at least 28 days after initiation of induction therapy, or relapse less than 90 days after first complete remission (CR) or CR with incomplete platelet recovery (CRi). All patients have received previous induction therapy with an anthracycline. Salvage regimen used were mainly cytarabine 3 g/m²/12h, d1-4 plus idarubicine 12 mg/m²/d, d1-3 or dauno 60 mg/m²/d, d1-2 or amsacrine 200 mg/m²/d, d1-3; less frequently MiDAM (mitoxantrone 12mg/m² d1-3, cytarabine1 g/m²/12h d1-5, GO 4-6mg/m², d4) or FLAG-Ida. Cytarabine dose for patients >60 was reduced to 1g/m²/12h, d1-5. We found, in our database, 151 R/R AML according to VALOR criteria treated between 2000 and 2013: 72 patients (48%) had refractory diseases (primary refractory: n=60, 40% and relapse less than 90 days after CR: n=12, 8.0%) and 79 (52%) had relapsed (early relapse more than 90 days after CR and less than one year: n=52, 66%; late relapse between one and two years: n=27, 34%). Patients characteristics were as follows: 85 (56%) were male, median age was 48 years (interquartile range [IQR], 36-60.5; 38 (27%) were 60 years or older). Cytogenetics at diagnosis was favorable in 18 (12%); intermediate in 93 (62%); adverse in 38 (25%) or unknown in 2 (1%) patients, respectively. They were treated as first line therapy with one (42%) or two cycles (58%). Early death rates at day 30 and day 60 were 7% and 17% in the whole cohort; 6% and 12% in younger patients and 12% and 29% in patients 60 years or older. Combined CR rate (defined as CR and CRi) was 53% for the whole cohort, and 57%/42%/56%/52%/63%/50% for <60 years/≥60 years/relapses/early relapses/late relapses/refractory diseases respectively. Allogeneic-SCT was performed in 25 out of 80 patients (31%) having achieved CR after salvage treatment. Median overall survival (OS) was 8 months for the whole cohort and 9.2/5.0/7.7/7.5/13.6/9.2 months for <60 years/≥60 years/relapses/early relapses/late relapses/refractory diseases respectively. Using VALOR inclusion criteria, age is the main factor that discriminate R/R AML patients selected for clinical trials using IDAC as control arm compared to patients of daily practice. Thus, those patient populations remain hardly comparable. However, as far as CR is concerned, IDAC seems suboptimal as compared to higher-intensity regimen used in daily practice. Yet, this higher CR rates do not translate into a significant gain in survival since median OS remains close to that of IDAC with the possible exception of refractory patients who seem to benefit from higher-intensity regimen. Thus, although unsatisfactory, IDAC could be considered as a fair control arm for overall survival endpoint especially in patients older than 60 year of age. Table Table. Disclosures Tavitian: Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Huguet:Pfizer, Novartis, BMS, Ariad, Jazz, Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Recher:Celgene, Sunesis, Amgen, Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene, Sunesis, Amgen, Novartis, Chugai: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Chronic Graft-Versus-Host Disease and Its Association with Treatment-Related Mortality, Relapse, Leukemia-Free and Overall Survival After Umbilical Cord Blood Transplantation (UCBT) In Children and Adolescents with Acute Leukemia

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v116.21.213.213 ◽

2010 ◽

Vol 116 (21) ◽

pp. 213-213

Author(s):

Mary Eapen ◽

Tao Wang ◽

Joanne Kurtzberg ◽

Stephanie J. Lee ◽

Reggie Duerst ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Overall Survival ◽

Acute Leukemia ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Acute Gvhd ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Graft Versus Host ◽

Gvhd Prophylaxis ◽

Grade 3 ◽

Related Mortality ◽

Overall Mortality

Abstract Abstract 213 Chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) is the leading cause of late transplant-related mortality (TRM) after unrelated adult donor transplantation. However, limited, mild or moderate cGVHD may be associated with higher survival in part due to an association with lower relapse risk in adults with acute and chronic leukemia. While cGVHD rates are generally lower in children, we sought to determine the impact of cGVHD after UCBT on risk of relapse, TRM, leukemia-free survival (LFS) and overall survival (OS) as well as to identify risk factors for cGVHD after UCBT. Patients <18 years with acute lymphoblastic or acute myeloblastic leukemia transplanted with a single UCB unit after myeloablative conditioning between 1995–2007 who survived without recurrent leukemia for more than 3 months were eligible for analysis. Of the 657 patients, 59% were male, 26% were >10 years of age, 24% were transplanted in third remission or beyond, 74% were conditioned with TBI, 83% had pre-transplant anti-thymocyte globulin and 11% received tacrolimus, rather than cyclosporine, for acute GVHD prophylaxis. The cumulative incidence of cGVHD was 25% at 5 years with mild, moderate and severe disease in 91, 38 and 19 patients, respectively. cGVHD rates did not vary with donor-recipient HLA disparity. We constructed Cox proportional hazard-regression models to examine the effects of cGVHD on TRM, relapse, treatment failure (relapse or death; inverse of LFS) and overall mortality adjusting for age, disease, disease status, transplantation period, GVHD prophylaxis and donor-recipient HLA match. The risks of TRM (hazard ratio [HR] 9.33, p<0.0001), treatment failure (HR 2.96, p<0.0001) and overall mortality (HR 4.79, p<0.0001) were significantly higher in patients who developed cGVHD compared to those who did not develop cGVHD. In contrast to reports in adults transplanted with bone marrow or peripheral blood, mortality risk did not vary in those with mild, moderate or severe cGVHD after UCBT. Notably, relapse risk was not altered by the development of cGVHD (HR 0.73, p=0.38). In multivariate analysis, after adjusting for age and transplantation period, cGVHD risks were higher in patients who received tacrolimus (HR 3.12, p<0.0001) and in those with a prior history of grade 2 acute GVHD (HR 2.04, p=0.0001) or grade 3–4 acute GVHD (HR 5.51, p<0.0001) with a higher risk of cGVHD in patients with grade 3–4 versus grade 2 acute GVHD (HR 2.70, p<0.0001). These data suggest cGVHD of any severity has a markedly negative impact on survival after UCBT in children with acute leukemia without the associated graft-versus-leukemia effect previously reported for other stem cell sources. This analysis compels us to reevaluate our current acute GVHD prophylaxis strategies, including how tacrolimus is typically used, in an attempt to reduce the risk of cGVHD and its deleterious effect on LFS and OS after UCBT. Disclosures: Weisdorf: Genzyme: Research Funding; Hospira:Wagner:CORD:USE: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; VidaCord: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Bortezomib (Velcade) in the Treatment of Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Analysis of Safety and Efficacy of Bortezomib From Registry of Monoclonal Gammopathy of Czech Myeloma Group

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v120.21.1872.1872 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 120 (21) ◽

pp. 1872-1872

Author(s):

Viera Sandecka ◽

Ivan Spicka ◽

Vladimir Maisnar ◽

Tomas Pika ◽

Evzen Gregora ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Overall Survival ◽

Stem Cell ◽

Czech Republic ◽

Stem Cell Transplantation ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Cell Transplantation ◽

Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation ◽

Median Number ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

The Czech Republic

Abstract Abstract 1872 Background: Bortezomib (Velcade) is one of the most effective treatment options in the treatment of relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). In the Czech Republic, it has been available since 2004. Registry of monoclonal gammopathy (RMG) of the Czech Myeloma Group contains information of more than 90% of patients in the Czech Republic treated with novel drugs.Aims: The aim of this retrospective analysis was to verify the therapeutic efficacy and safety of bortezomib in the treatment of RRMM in the Czech Republic. Methods: Before inclusion to RMG, all persons signed the informed consent form. In total, 1469 MM patients treated with bortezomib were evaluated from the RMG between June 2004 and December 2011.A total of 51.5% (750/1469) RRMM patients were analyzed with follow-up ≥6 months from the start of first administration of bortezomib. 30.6% (450/1469) patients with newly diagnosed MM were excluded from the analysis as well as 18.2% (267/1469) with a short follow-up. Evaluation of treatment response was performed according to the IMWG criteria. Median patient age was 65 years (range 33.9–88.1), median time since starting therapy was 21.5 months (range 6.1– 86.2), median number of previous treatments was 3.0 (range 1.0–8.0). In total, 92% (690/750) patients finished treatment of bortezomib (cycles length 21–28 days with application on days 1, 4, 8,11 or 1, (4), 8, 15 for frail patients). Median number of bortezomib cycles delivered was 6 (0.5–15.5). Results: Assessment of therapeutic response was possible in 92% (690/750) of treated patients. Overall response (ORR) in 57.5% (397/690) patients including 3% sCR, 8% CR, 20.3% VGPR, 26.2% PR. Stable disease was confirmed in 11.4% (79/690) patients and 22.5% (155/690) patients had progressive disease. In 50.1% of responders, first response (≥MR; defined as a ≥25% decrease in the serum MIg) occurred within the first cycle. At the second cycle, 24.2% of responders started to respond. Median time to progression (TTP) for all responders was 12.4 months. Median overall survival after starting bortezomib therapy (OS) was 32.3 months for all responders. Altogether, 692 adverse events (AEs) were documented. The most frequent AEs were: anemia in 62% of patients (462/750); severity of anemia was distributed as follows: 33.3% (250/750) cases of grade 1, 28.3% (212/750) cases of grade 2. Thrombocytopenia grade 3 and 4 was seen in 21.5% (161/750) of patients. Pre-existing peripheral neuropathy (PNP) grade 1–2 was presented in 25.1% (191/750) of patients at the start of bortezomib treatment. After treatment of bortezomib, PNP could be documented in 59.3% (445/750) cases with 16% (71/445) cases of grade 3 and 0.7% (3/445) cases of grade 4 PNP. In subanalysis, groups of patients were compared with relapsed patients who were treated with bortezomib in the second, third or greater-line of therapy. Among these three groups, there were significant differences in the evaluation of ORR (59.8% vs. 53.4% vs. 46.8%, p=0.022), as well as the sCR+CR was dependent on the number of previous treatment lines (15.6% vs 7.3% vs. 1.4%; p<0.001). Median TTP had similar dynamics (14.5 vs. 11.0 vs. 10.0 months; p= < 0.001). Altogether, 55.5% (416/750) of patients were pre-treated with thalidomide, while other patients were pre-treated with only conventional cytotoxic agens. Between these two groups we found differences in the achievement of treatment response: sCR+CR (8% vs. 14.1%; p =0.007), median TTP (11.0 vs. 15.0 months; p = 0.001) and median OS from the start of treatment with bortezomib (28.2 vs. 36.5 months; p = 0.001). Autologous stem cell transplantation after treatment with bortezomib was performed in 13.9% (104/750) of patients with positive effect on survival compared to patients without autologous stem cell transplantation (median OS 42.4 vs. 31.2 months; p = 0.007, median TTP 19.4 vs. 11.4 months; p <0.001). Conclusion: Our results show that bortezomib is one of the highly effective drugs for patients with RRMM. In current practice, the benefit (measured TTP) is 10–14 months, according to severity of the disease with a favorable impact on overall survival even in heavily pretreated patients. Implementation of autologous stem cell transplantation in relapsed disease following bortezomib treatment had a beneficial effect on overall survival. Acknowledgments: This work was supported by IGA NT 12130–4 and IGA NT 12215–4 grants. Disclosures: Maisnar: Janssen Cilag: Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bayer (Schering): Honoraria. Hajek:Merck: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen Cilag: Honoraria.

Download Full-text

A Phase I/II Open-Label Multicenter Study Of The Cyclin Kinase Inhibitor AT7519M Alone and In Combination With Bortezomib In Patients With Previously Treated Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v122.21.1976.1976 ◽

2013 ◽

Vol 122 (21) ◽

pp. 1976-1976 ◽

Cited By ~ 6

Author(s):

Noopur Raje ◽

Parameswaran N. Hari ◽

Heather Landau ◽

Paul G. Richardson ◽

Jacalyn Rosenblatt ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Kinase Inhibitor ◽

Median Number ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Grade 3 ◽

Number Of Cycles ◽

Dose Levels ◽

Cyclin Kinase Inhibitor

Abstract Background The benefits of targeting the cyclins and RNAPII transcription in multiple myeloma (MM) was previously demonstrated using the cyclin kinase inhibitor AT7519 in preclinical studies. Predicated upon this work, a phase I/II trial was undertaken in relapsed refractory MM patients Purpose To identify the optimum dose of the AT7519M both as a single agent (Part one) and in combination with Bortezomib (Part two) in patients with MM. Methods In Part one nine patients with relapsed or refractory MM were treated with AT7519M alone using a twice weekly regimen (days one, four, eight and eleven) of a 21 day cycle. The starting dose of AT7519M was 21 mg/m2 per dose during Cycle one, and provided treatment was well tolerated the dose was escalated to 27 mg/m2 per dose for Cycle two onwards. In the second part of the study the safety and tolerability of the combination of AT7519M (dose levels 14 and 21 mg/m2 per dose) with Bortezomib (dose levels 1 and 1.3 mg/m2 per dose) were explored in an escalating fashion using a “3 + 3” design. In order to be eligible patients must have measurable MM, and initially must have had progressed through at least two previous lines of therapy or following a protocol amendment, been refractory to Bortezomib, as defined by progression on a Bortezomib-containing regimen within six weeks of starting the study. Patients with significantly abnormal liver or renal function (creatinine clearance < 30 ml/min) or significant underlying neuropathy were excluded. Results The median number of cycles of treatment administered in the first part of the study (9 patients) was two (range two to four) and the best response to treatment was stable disease. Two patients discontinued treatment as a result of toxicity – one as a result of a persistent elevation in serum creatinine and the second as a consequence of Grade 3 fatigue. Two patients did not undergo a dose escalation to 27 mg/m2 as planned because of poor tolerability of the 21 mg/m2 dose (fatigue) or progressive disease. Pharmacokinetic analysis of the two dose levels revealed overlapping exposure and further evaluation of the 27 mg/m2 dose was not performed. In the second part of the study, three patients per cohort, 9 patients in total, were treated at escalating AT7519/Bortezomib dose levels of 14 mg/m2/1 mg/m2; 21 mg/m2/1 mg/m2 21 mg/m2/1.3 mg/m2. The median number of previous regimens was 5 (range 2 – 6). Based on the investigator assessments at least one objective response was seen at each dose level (MR x1, PR x 2, VGPR x 1). The median number of cycles received was three (range one to 9; ongoing). There were no dose-limiting toxicities. The most commonly reported adverse events to date have been haematological in nature. There have been two adverse events ≥Grade 3 in severity (neutropenia, and dyspnea) considered to be at least possibly related to treatment. Conclusions Treatment with AT7519M was well tolerated in this patient population and full doses of this agent and Bortezomib were successfully achieved in combination. The maximum tolerated dose was 21 mg/m2 AT7519M and 1.3 mg/m2 Bortezomib. Although no significant efficacy was seen following treatment with AT7519M alone in this heavily pretreated patient population, the combination of AT7519M with Bortezomib achieved significant (33% ≥ PR) responses in a proportion of patients who were either pre-treated with or refractory to treatment with Bortezomib. Disclosures: Raje: Celgene, Millenium, Onyx, Amgen: Consultancy; Acetylon, Eli Lilly: Research Funding. Richardson:Millennium: The Takeda Oncology Company: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Johnson & Johnson: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Britsol-Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Lyons:Astex Pharmaceuticals Inc.: Employment. Langford:Astex: Employment. Yule:Astex: Consultancy.

Download Full-text

Azacitidine (AZA) Prolongs Overall Survival in Older Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) with Poor Prognostic Karyotypes Compared with Conventional Care Regimens (CCR)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v128.22.1638.1638 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 128 (22) ◽

pp. 1638-1638 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Hartmut Döhner ◽

Paresh Vyas ◽

John F. Seymour ◽

Valeria Santini ◽

Richard M. Stone ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Overall Survival ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Older Patients ◽

Research Funding ◽

Complex Karyotype ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Cytogenetic Abnormalities ◽

Poor Risk ◽

Equity Ownership

Abstract Background: Karyotype is the strongest independent prognostic factor for survival in AML. The randomized phase 3 AZA-AML-001 study of older patients with AML showed AZA prolonged overall survival (OS) compared with CCR (10.4 vs 6.5 months, respectively; P=0.101) (Dombret et al, Blood, 2015). In a prospective subanalysis of the study, AZA was shown to meaningfully prolong OS by 3.2 months compared with CCR (P=0.0185) in the subgroup of patients with NCCN-defined poor-risk cytogenetics (Döhner et al, Blood, 2014: Abstract 621). Aim: This analysis evaluates treatment effects of AZA vs CCR on OS in subgroups of patients with specific cytogenetic abnormalities as well as in patient subgroups defined by cytogenetic risk per modified European LeukemiaNet (ELN) recommendations (not considering molecular markers) (Döhner et al, Blood, 2010). Methods: Patients aged ≥65 years with newly diagnosed AML (>30% bone marrow [BM] blasts), ECOG performance status score ≤2, intermediate- or poor-risk cytogenetics per NCCN 2009 criteria, and WBC count ≤15x109/L were randomized to receive AZA (75 mg/m2/day [d] x7d/28d) or CCR: intensive chemotherapy (cytarabine 100-200mg/m2IV x7d + anthracycline IV x3d induction), low-dose ara-C (20mg SC BID x10d/28d), or best supportive care only. Karyotypes obtained from BM were reviewed centrally by an independent cytogeneticist. OS was evaluated in subgroups of patients with frequent specific abnormalities, including -5/del(5q), -7, -7/del(7q), abnormal (17p) or complex karyotype (based on specific abnormalities, patients may have been evaluated in more than one category). OS was also assessed for patients in ELN-defined karyotype risk subgroups: Intermediate (Int)-I (normal karyotype), Int-II (all abnormalities not classified as Favorable or Adverse), and Adverse karyotype. OS was assessed using Kaplan-Meier methods and compared using a weighted log-rank test. Results: Centrally reviewed cytogenetic data were available for 485/488 patients (99.4%). In all, 220 patients (45.4%; AZA n=114, CCR n=106) had Int-I karyotype, 111 patients (22.9%; AZA n=53, CCR n=58) had Int-II karyotype, and 154 patients (31.8%, AZA n=73, CCR n=81) had Adverse karyotype (Figure 1). OS was comparable between AZA and CCR in patients with Int-I karyotype (14.1 vs 10.1 months, respectively; hazard ratio [HR] 0.83, 95%CI 0.60, 1.1; P=0.44) and patients with Int-II karyotype (8.9 vs 9.6 months; HR 1.19, 95%CI 0.79, 1.8; P=0.78). There was a significant 2.4-month median OS difference in favor of AZA in patients with Adverse karyotype (5.3 vs 2.9 months with CCR; HR 0.71, 95%CI 0.51, 0.99; P=0.046; Figure 2), with 1-year survival rates of 29.1% vs 14.7% for AZA and CCR, respectively. AZA was associated with longer median OS and higher 1-year survival compared with CCR for all subgroups of patients with the specific cytogenetic abnormalities under study: -5/del(5q), -7, -7/del(7q), abnormal (17p), and complex karyotype, with HRs ranging from 0.54 to 0.69(Table). Median OS in the CCR arm was less than 3 months for each of these subgroups. Similar to what has been reported in MDS (Ravandi et al, Cancer, 2009), AML patients with chromosome 7 abnormalities responded particularly well to AZA, with an improvement in median OS of 4.1 months over CCR. Patients with complex karyotypes also had meaningful improvements in OS, with ~15% more AZA-treated patients alive at 1 year than CCR patients. Conclusions: Prognosis is dismal for older AML patients with adverse karyotypes, and is especially poor for patients with complex karyotypes. Median OS and 1-year survival in patients with ELN-defined Adverse karyotype treated with AZA were almost double those of patients treated with CCR. AZA-treated patients with the specific cytogenetic abnormalities and/or complex karyotype in this analysis had a 31-46% reduction in risk of death vs CCR, and proportions of patients alive at 1 year were 11-22% greater with AZA. These data suggest AZA should be the preferred treatment for older patients with AML and adverse karyotypes. Disclosures Seymour: Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel support, Speakers Bureau; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel support, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Genentech: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Santini:Astex: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Onconova: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Stone:Celator: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Xenetic Biosciences: Consultancy; Agios: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Karyopharm: Consultancy; Jansen: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; ONO: Consultancy; Juno Therapeutics: Consultancy; Merck: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy; Sunesis Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Al-Ali:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Morrill:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Songer:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Weaver:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Skikne:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Beach:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Dombret:Agios: Honoraria; Ambit (Daiichi Sankyo): Honoraria; Menarini: Honoraria; Menarini: Honoraria; Servier: Honoraria; Sunesis: Honoraria; Karyopharm: Honoraria; Kite Pharma.: Honoraria, Research Funding; Astellas: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Honoraria; Roche/Genentech: Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria; Ariad: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Jazz Pharma: Honoraria, Research Funding.

Download Full-text