scholarly journals Pediatric-Inspired Chemotherapy Incorporating Pegaspargase Is Safe and Results in High Rates of MRD Negativity in Adults Ages 18-60 with Philadelphia Chromosome-Negative Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia and Lymphoblastic Lymphoma

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 4013-4013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark Blaine Geyer ◽  
Ellen K. Ritchie ◽  
Arati V. Rao ◽  
M. Isabella Cazacu ◽  
Shreya Vemuri ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Philadelphia Chromosome ◽  
Advisory Board ◽  
Lymphoblastic Lymphoma ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Introduction: Among adolescents and young adults with (w/) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) or lymphoblastic lymphoma (LBL), treatment using a pediatric (vs. adult) regimen appears to achieve superior event-free (EFS) and overall survival (OS); this observation has driven increased interest in adapting pediatric regimens for middle-aged adults w/ ALL/LBL. However, greater risk of toxicities associated w/ asparaginase complicates administration of pediatric-inspired regimens in adults. We therefore designed a pediatric-inspired chemotherapy regimen w/ doses of pegaspargase (PEG) rationally synchronized to limit overlapping toxicities w/ other chemotherapeutic agents. Methods: We conducted a phase II multi-center trial in adults ages 18-60 w/ newly-diagnosed Philadelphia chromosome-negative (Ph-) ALL/LBL (NCT01920737). Pts w/ Ph+ ALL or Burkitt-type ALL were ineligible. The treatment regimen consisted of 2-phase induction (I-1, I-2), followed by consolidation w/ 2 courses of alternating high-dose methotrexate-based intensification and reinduction, followed by 3 years of maintenance (Figure 1). PEG 2000 IU/m2 was administered in each of the 6 intensive courses of induction/consolidation at intervals of ≥4 weeks. Minimal residual disease (MRD) was assessed in bone marrow (BM) by multiparameter flow cytometry (FACS) on day (d) 15 of I1 and following I-1 and I-2. Any detectable MRD (even <0.01% of BM WBCs) was considered positive. Toxicities were assessed by CTCAE v4.0. Results: 39 pts were enrolled (30M, 9F), w/ B-ALL (n=28), T-ALL (n=7), B-LBL (n=3), and T-LBL (n=5). Median age at start of treatment was 38.3 years (range 20.2-60.4), w/ 18 pts age 40-60. Grade 3-4 toxicities associated w/ PEG are summarized in Table 1. Grade 3-4 hyperbilirubinemia was observed post-PEG in I-1 in 9 pts, but only recurred thereafter in 1/8 pts resuming PEG. Pts completing consolidation on protocol (n=16) received median of 6 doses of PEG (range, 2-6). Four pts developed hypersensitivity to PEG and subsequently received Erwinia asparaginase. PEG was discontinued in 4 additional pts due to hepatotoxicity (n=2), pancreatitis (n=1), and physician preference (n=1). Of pts w/ available response assessments, 35/36 (97%) achieved morphologic complete response (CR) or CR w/ incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi) following I-1 (n=34) or I-2 (n=1). Both pts not achieving CR/CRi after I-I had early T-precursor ALL; one of these pts was withdrawn from study, and the other (w/ M2 marrow after I-1) achieved CR after I-2. Of the pts w/ ALL (excluding LBL) w/ available BM MRD assessments, 11/28 (39%) achieved undetectable MRD by FACS following I-1; 18/22 (82%) achieved undetectable MRD by FACS following I-2. Of the pts w/ LBL w/ available BM MRD assessments, 7/7 (100%) achieved or maintained undetectable MRD by FACS following I-1 and I-2. Ten pts underwent allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) in CR1. Seven pts experienced relapse at median 15.2 months from start of treatment (range, 5.4-30.4), of whom 6 subsequently underwent 1st (n=5) or 2nd (n=1) alloHCT. Of the 11 pts w/ ALL w/ undetectable MRD following I-1, only one has relapsed. Five patients have died, including 2 pts in CR1 (from sepsis and multi-organ system failure), and 3 pts in relapse. At median follow-up of 22.3 months among surviving pts (range, 1.0-48.1), median EFS and OS (Figure 2A&B) have not been reached (EFS not censored at alloHCT). 3-year EFS was 62.1% (95% CI: 38.4-78.9%) and 3-year OS was 80.0% (95% CI: 57.5-91.4%). Conclusions: PEG can be incorporated into pediatric-inspired chemotherapy regimens w/ manageable toxicity for appropriately selected adults up to age 60 w/ Ph- ALL/LBL. While PEG-related AEs are common, few pts require permanent discontinuation of asparaginase. Grade 3-4 hyperbilirubinemia was common, particularly post-I-1, but recurred infrequently when PEG was continued. Two induction courses resulted in a high rate of MRD negativity post-I-2 and translated to a low rate of relapse. Though further follow-up is required, 3-year EFS is encouraging. Data regarding asparaginase enzyme activity and silent inactivation w/ neutralizing anti-PEG antibody will be presented. Ongoing and future studies will additionally investigate whether incorporating novel therapies (e.g. blinatumomab, nelarabine) into frontline consolidation therapy may reduce risk of relapse among adults receiving PEG-containing regimens. Disclosures Geyer: Dava Oncology: Honoraria. Ritchie:Celgene: Consultancy, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses, Speakers Bureau; NS Pharma: Research Funding; Incyte: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; ARIAD Pharmaceuticals: Speakers Bureau; Astellas Pharma: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding. Rao:Kite, a Gilead Company: Employment. Tallman:Daiichi-Sankyo: Other: Advisory board; AROG: Research Funding; Cellerant: Research Funding; AbbVie: Research Funding; BioSight: Other: Advisory board; Orsenix: Other: Advisory board; ADC Therapeutics: Research Funding. Douer:Shire: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Gilead Sciences: Consultancy; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Pfizer: Honoraria; Spectrum: Consultancy. Park:Kite Pharma: Consultancy; Juno Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Shire: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Consultancy.

Blinatumomab in Children with Relapsed or Refractory B-Precursor Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (R/R-ALL): Final Results of 110 Patients Treated in an Expanded Access Study (RIALTO)

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 24-25
Author(s):  
Franco Locatelli ◽  
Gerhard Zugmaier ◽  
Noemi Mergen ◽  
Peter Bader ◽  
Sima Jeha ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Final Analysis ◽  
Publicly Traded ◽  
Primary Analysis ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Grade 3

Introduction: The open-label, expanded access study (RIALTO) demonstrated that blinatumomab is efficacious with a manageable safety profile in children with relapsed or refractory B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (R/R BCP-ALL). Blinatumomab is a BiTE® (bispecific T-cell engager) immuno-oncology therapy that activates cytotoxic T cells to kill target B cells. Here, findings from the final analysis of RIALTO are presented (NCT02187354). Methods: Enrolled in the study were children &gt;28 days and &lt;18 years of age with R/R CD19+ BCP-ALL (defined as ≥2 relapses, relapse after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant [alloHSCT], or refractory to prior treatments) and ≥5% blasts or &lt;5% blasts but with minimal residual disease (MRD) level ≥10−3. Blinatumomab was given as continuous infusion in a 6-week cycle (4 weeks on and 2 weeks off) for up to 5 cycles and safety follow-up visit 30 days post-treatment. Patients with &lt;25% blasts were dosed at 15 µg/m2/day, whereas those with ≥25% blasts were dosed at 5 µg/m2/day (days 1-7 of cycle 1) followed by dose increase to 15 µg/m2/day. Primary endpoint was incidence of treatment-emergent (TE) and treatment-related (TR) adverse events (AEs). Secondary endpoints included complete response (CR; &lt;5% blasts) and MRD response (&lt;10−4 blasts by PCR or flow-cytometry) in the first 2 cycles, relapse-free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS), and alloHSCT rate after blinatumomab treatment. Results: As of the data cutoff date (January 10, 2020) for the final analysis, demographics and baseline characteristics of 110 patients enrolled (median age, 8.5 years [95% CI 0.4-17.0]), 61% had &lt;50% blasts at baseline, and 11% had &lt;5% blasts (n=12; with MRD ≥10−3) remain unchanged compared with the primary analysis (Table 1). For best treatment response within the first 2 cycles, results are comparable to that of the primary analysis. Among 110 patients, overall CR rate was 62.7% (n= 69). Of 98 patients with ≥5% blasts at baseline, 59% (n=58) achieved CR; of them, 79% (n=46) achieved an MRD response and 62% (n=39) proceeded to HSCT. The 2 patients with t(17;19) achieved CR with an MRD response. Of the 4 patients with germline trisomy 21 (Down syndrome), 3 achieved CR with an MRD response Among the 12 patients with &lt;5% blasts but with MRD ≥10−3 at baseline, 92% (n=11) achieved CR and MRD response; 75% (n=9) proceeded to HSCT (Table 2). Of the 5 patients who had received prior blinatumomab , 4 achieved CR. Of 110 patients treated with blinatumomab, median OS (95% CI) was 14.6 (11-24.5) months with median follow-up time of 18.2 months, which increased by 1.5 months compared with that reported in the primary analysis, with 29.9% of patients still surviving at month 24. Median RFS (95% CI) remains unchanged at 8.5 months (4.7-14.0), with a median follow-up time of 11.5 months in patients who achieved CR; 38% of patients relapsed and 9% died. RFS was more favorable for patients who received HSCT post blinatumomab (70%) than for those who did not (30%) at month 12, respectively, which is consistent with the results from primary analysis. Among patients who had HSCT prior to blinatumomab (n= 45), median OS (95%) was 16.6 (7.1-NE) months vs 14.6 (10.9-24.5) months in patients without HSCT prior to blinatumomab (n= 65). Compared with the primary analysis, 5 additional patients received HSCT after achieving CR in the final analysis. Median OS among patients in CR after HSCT by MRD responders vs MRD non-responders was NE at 15-month analysis (Figure). Safety results in the final analysis were consistent with those reported in the primary analysis. Of 110 patients, 99% experienced TEAEs, with 65% being grade ≥3 (see Table 3 for details). TRAEs were reported in 74% of patients; 26% were grade ≥3 and 19% were deemed serious. Details on grade ≥3 TRAEs are shown in Table 3. The 9 fatal AEs, unrelated to blinatumomab, occurred due to relapse and progressive nature of the disease (Table 3). Conclusions: Overall, the safety and efficacy results from the final analysis are consistent with those reported in the primary analysis as no new safety signals were observed. These findings strengthen the observation that blinatumomab demonstrates durable efficacy and is a suitable treatment option in children with R/R BCP-ALL. Table 1. Disclosures Locatelli: Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Medac: Speakers Bureau; Miltenyi: Speakers Bureau; Bellicum Pharmaceutical: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz Pharmaceeutical: Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Zugmaier:Amgen: Current Employment, Other: Personal Fees ; 20190300609: Patents & Royalties: Licensed patient . Mergen:Amgen: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Bader:Medac: Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Neovii: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Riemser: Research Funding. Schlegel:bluebird bio: Honoraria. Bourquin:Servier: Other: Travel Support. Handgretinger:Amgen: Honoraria. Brethon:Amgen: Other: invitation to meetings, remunerations for oral presentations, advices for the record of Blinatumomab in pediatrics in France. Rössig:Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; EUSA Pharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genetech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Kormany:Amgen: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Viswagnachar:IQVIA: Current Employment.

scholarly journals Blinatumomab in Pediatric Patients with Relapsed/Refractory B-Cell Precursor and Molecularly Resistant Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (R/R ALL): Updated Analysis of 110 Patients Treated in an Expanded Access Study (RIALTO)

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 1294-1294 ◽  
Author(s):  
Franco Locatelli ◽  
Gerhard Zugmaier ◽  
Peter Bader ◽  
Sima Jeha ◽  
Paul-Gerhardt Schlegel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Children And Adolescents ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Pediatric Patients ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Expanded Access ◽  
Grade 3

Introduction: Although survival rates in children and adolescents with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) have improved significantly, relapsed or refractory (R/R) ALL remains a leading cause of cancer-related deaths in pediatric patients. Blinatumomab is a bispecific T-cell engager (BiTE®) immuno-oncology therapy that activates endogenous cytotoxic T cells to kill target B cells. We report the primary analysis results of RIALTO, an expanded access study, where pediatric patients with R/R ALL were treated with blinatumomab (NCT02187354). Methods: Enrolled in the study were children and adolescents >28 days and <18 years of age with R/R CD19+ ALL (defined as ≥2 relapses, relapse after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant [HSCT], or refractory to prior treatments) and ≥5% blasts or <5% blasts but with minimal residual disease (MRD) level ≥10−3. Blinatumomab was given as continuous infusion in a 6-week cycle (4 weeks of treatment and 2 weeks of treatment-free interval) for up to 5 cycles. Patients with <25% blasts were dosed at 15 µg/m2/day, whereas those with ≥25% blasts were dosed at 5 µg/m2/day (days 1-7 of cycle 1) followed by dose increase to 15 µg/m2/day. Any change in therapy (eg, HSCT) was off-protocol and per investigator preference. Primary endpoint was incidence of treatment-emergent (TE) and treatment-related (TR) adverse events (AEs). Secondary endpoints included incidence of morphological complete response (CR; <5% blasts) and MRD response (<10−4 blasts by PCR or flow cytometry) in the first 2 cycles, relapse-free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS), and HSCT rate after blinatumomab treatment. Data cutoff was September 27, 2018. Results: Of 110 patients enrolled (median age, 8.5 years [95% CI 0.4-17.0]), 60% were 7-17 years of age, 61% had <50% blasts at baseline, and 11% had <5% blasts (n=12; with MRD ≥10−3). Among 12 patients with <5% blasts and MRD-positive disease at baseline, 0 had prior relapse after HSCT and 2 had chromosome translocation mutations. Prior treatments included HSCT (41%) and blinatumomab (5%); 56% of patients had ≥2 relapses and 40% relapsed after HSCT (Table 1). Of 98 patients with ≥5% blasts at baseline, 58 (59%) achieved CR (<5% blasts), 0 achieved partial remission (PR; ≥5 to <25% blasts), and 20 (20%) showed progressive disease (PD; ≥25% blasts) after the first 2 cycles. Of the 58 patients who reached CR, 39 (67%) achieved CR with full recovery of peripheral blood counts, 46 (47%) achieved an MRD response, and 36 (62%) proceeded to HSCT after achieving CR. The 2 patients with t(17;19) achieved CR with an MRD response. Of the 4 patients with germline trisomy 21 (Down syndrome), 3 achieved CR with an MRD response. Among the 12 patients with <5% blasts but with MRD ≥10−3 at baseline, 11 (92%) achieved CR and MRD response and 1 (8%) had disease progression (Table 2). Overall, the response rates were higher among patients with lower tumor burden at baseline. Among 98 patients with ≥5% blasts at baseline, median OS was 13.1 months (95% CI, 9.8-21.3), with median follow-up time of 17.4 months. For patients reaching CR after the first 2 cycles, the median RFS was 8.5 months (95% CI, 3.4-NE), with a median follow-up time of 11.2 months; 38% of patients relapsed and 9% died. Of 110 patients treated with blinatumomab, 99% experienced TEAEs, with 65% being grade ≥3, including neurologic events (6%), cytokine release syndrome (CRS, 2%), cytopenias (38%), elevated liver enzymes (13%), infections (18%), and neutropenia (14%). TRAEs were reported in 74% of patients; 36% were grade ≥3 and 26% were deemed serious. Grade ≥3 TRAEs included neurologic events (5%), CRS (2%), cytopenias (9%), elevated liver enzyme (4%), infections (5%), and neutropenia (6%). Due to TRAEs, 22% of patients interrupted treatment and 5% discontinued treatment. The 9 fatal AEs, unrelated to blinatumomab, occurred due to relapse and progressive nature of the disease (Table 3). Conclusion: Overall, the safety profile of blinatumomab in this expanded access study in pediatric patients with R/R ALL was tolerable and consistent with that in other blinatumomab clinical trials. Patients, including those with persistent MRD and genetic disorders at baseline, achieved high rates of CR and MRD responses with low rates of relapse and disease progression. These findings support blinatumomab as a suitable treatment option for pediatric patients with R/R ALL. Disclosures Locatelli: BluebirdBio: Consultancy; Bellicum: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Miltenyi: Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Zugmaier:Amgen: Employment, Other: holds stock, Patents & Royalties: & other intellectual property. Bader:Amgen (Brasil), Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Medac: Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Riemser, Neovii: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy. Bourquin:Servier: Other: Travel support. Rossig:BMS, Pfizer, Roche: Other: speaker honoraria; Amgen, Celgene,EUSA Pharma, Genetech, Novartis, Roche: Other: advisory board.

scholarly journals Phase I Study of Ixazomib Added to Chemotherapy in the Treatment of Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Older Adults

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 41-42
Author(s):  
Philip C. Amrein ◽  
Karen K. Ballen ◽  
Kristen E. Stevenson ◽  
Traci M. Blonquist ◽  
Andrew M. Brunner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Complete Remission ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Survival Estimate ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Experienced Grade

Introduction: While progress has been made in the treatment of childhood leukemia, the outlook for patients &gt;60 years of age with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is poor with complete remission rates (CR) of approximately 60% and 3-year survivals (OS) of less than 15%. Intensified treatment in a later CALGB trial showed little improvement with a CR=61% and 5-year OS=6% (Stock, Cancer 2013). Ixazomib is an oral proteasome inhibitor, which has shown single agent activity and promising combination activity in pediatric ALL patients (Messinger, Blood 2012). We sought to assess the safety and tolerability, as well as early efficacy of adding ixazomib to a current MGH-DFCI/HCC multi-agent regimen for older adults with ALL. Methods: Patients aged 51 to 75 years of age with newly diagnosed B-ALL and T-ALL were screened for eligibility. Patients with mature ALL (including Burkitt's) were excluded. Patients with Philadelphia chromosome positive ALL (BCR-ABL1+) were eligible, and dasatinib was added to the chemotherapy on Day 10 for these patients. The chemotherapy treatment schedule from induction through maintenance is outlined in Table 1. A standard 3 + 3 patient cohort dose escalation design was used to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of ixazomib during induction for these patients, the primary objective of the trial. After consolidation I, patients in complete remission (CR) with a suitable donor were offered a hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) as per institutional guidelines. Those not going to HSCT continued therapy as noted in the table. Results: There were 19 patients with B-ALL enrolled, none with T-ALL. Among these patients, 7 harbored BCR-ABL1 rearrangements. The median age was 65 years, 74% were male, and 90% had a performance status 0 or 1. The MTD was 2.3 mg of ixazomib, as 2 patients at 3.0 mg developed DLT's: a grade 3 peripheral neuropathy and a grade 5 acute kidney injury (Table 2). Grade 3 and 4 toxicities encountered at any time consisted mainly of grade 4 neutropenia in 13 patients and grade 4 thrombocytopenia in 12 patients. One patient experienced grade 3 neutropenia and 5 patients experienced grade 3 thrombocytopenia. Two patients with grade 2 neuropathy did not meet the definition of DLT. Among the 19 patients, 15 (79%, [95% confidence interval (CI), 54-94%]) achieved CR (14) or CRi (1), and 5 patients went on to HSCT. The median follow-up time was 2 years (range, 1-5) for 8 patients remaining alive. The 1-year overall survival estimate was 53% [95% CI, 29-72%], while the 2-year overall survival estimate was 47% [95% CI, 24-67%]. Conclusions: A dose of 2.3 mg of ixazomib in combination with induction chemotherapy among older patients with ALL was well-tolerated and associated with a promising rate of complete remission. Disclosures Amrein: Takeda: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding. Brunner:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Research Funding; Forty-Seven Inc: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Research Funding. Hobbs:Novartis: Honoraria; Celgene/BMS: Honoraria; Jazz: Honoraria; Constellation: Honoraria, Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Bayer: Research Funding. Neuberg:Celgene: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Madrigak Pharmaceuticals: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Fathi:Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Agios: Consultancy, Research Funding; PTC Therapeutics: Consultancy; Amphivena: Consultancy; Astellas: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Newlink Genetics: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Blueprint: Consultancy; Trillium: Consultancy; Kura Oncology: Consultancy; Forty Seven: Consultancy; Jazz: Consultancy; Boston Biomedical: Consultancy; BMS/Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kite: Consultancy; Trovagene: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy. OffLabel Disclosure: MLN 9708, ixazomib is FDA approved for multiple myeloma. In this trial it is used to treat acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

scholarly journals Pegaspargase Can Safely be Administered in Adults Age 40 and Older with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 3816-3816 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryan J. Daley ◽  
Sridevi Rajeeve ◽  
Charlene C. Kabel ◽  
Jeremy J. Pappacena ◽  
Sarah E. Stump ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Philadelphia Chromosome ◽  
Hypersensitivity Reactions ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Frontline Treatment

Introduction: Asparaginase (ASP) has demonstrated a survival benefit in pediatric patients (pts) with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and is now part of standard-of-care frontline treatment. As a result, asparaginase preparations have been incorporated into the treatment of adult ALL to improve outcomes. Pegaspargase (PEG-ASP), a modified version of asparaginase with prolonged asparagine depletion, appears to be safe in adults up to age 40 (Stock, et al., Blood, 2019), but is associated with a unique spectrum of toxicities, the risks of which appear to increase with age. Therefore, the safety of PEG-ASP remains a significant concern in older adults w/ ALL. Methods: We conducted a single center retrospective chart review of pts age ≥40 years who received PEG-ASP as part of frontline induction/consolidation or reinduction, between March 2008 and June 2018 at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. The primary objective was to evaluate the tolerability and toxicity of PEG-ASP based on the incidence and severity of ASP-related toxicities (hypersensitivity reactions, hypertriglyceridemia, hyperbilirubinemia, transaminitis, pancreatitis, hypofibrinogenemia, etc) according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.03. Laboratory values recorded were either the peak or the nadir, the more appropriate for toxicity assessment, within a 4-week period following PEG-ASP administration. Secondary objectives were to determine the total number of doses of PEG-ASP administered in comparison to the number of doses intended, and to characterize the rationale for PEG-ASP discontinuation when applicable. Fisher's exact test was used to compare the incidence of PEG-ASP toxicities with respect to pt and treatment characteristics (regimen, age, BMI, gender, Philadelphia chromosome positive (Ph+) vs. Ph-, presence of extramedullary disease, PEG-ASP dose). P values were not adjusted for multiple comparisons. Results: We identified 60 pts with ALL (40 B-ALL and 20 T-ALL) who received at least one dose of PEG-ASP. Nine pts were Ph+. The median pt age at initiation of the treatment was 53, (range, 40 to 80), and 19 pts had a BMI ≥30 kg/m2. Forty-four pts received treatment for newly diagnosed ALL, and 16 pts for relapsed disease. Table 1 lists pt baseline characteristics. Among the 44 pts with newly diagnosed ALL, 27 pts received PEG-ASP as part of pediatric or pediatric-inspired regimens at doses of 2000 - 2500 units/m2, and 1 pt received a modified dose of 1000 units/m2 due to age. The remaining 16 pts received PEG-ASP at doses of 1000 - 2000 units/m2 for consolidation, per established adult regimens (ALL-2 and L-20; Lamanna, et al., Cancer, 2013). Grade 3/4 ASP-related toxicities with a >10% incidence included: hyperbilirubinemia, transaminitis, hypoalbuminemia, hyperglycemia, hypofibrinogenemia, and hypertriglyceridemia. Frontline treatment regimens in which PEG-ASP was used in consolidation cycles only (ALL-2, L-20) were associated w/ a lower incidence of hyperbilirubinemia (p=0.009) and hypertriglyceridemia (p<0.001) compared to those regimens that included PEG-ASP during induction (pediatric/pediatric-inspired regimens) (Table 2). Younger age (40-59 vs. ≥60 years) was associated with a greater risk of hypertriglyceridemia (p<0.001) and higher PEG-ASP dose (≥2000 vs. <2000 units/m2) was associated with a greater risk of hypertriglyceridemia and hypofibrinogenemia (p=0.002 and p=0.025, respectively). Thirty-eight pts (63%) received all intended doses of PEG-ASP. Six pts stopped PEG-ASP to proceed to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (5 in CR1, 1 in CR2), and 7 pts stopped for hypersensitivity reactions. Hepatotoxicity was the only ASP-related toxicity that led to PEG-ASP discontinuation occurring in 5 pts (hyperbilirubinemia, N=4; transaminitis, N=1). The total number of intended doses of PEG-ASP based on regimens used was 186, and 112 were administered. Conclusion: PEG-ASP was incorporated into the treatment of 60 adult ALL pts age ≥40, with manageable toxicity. Seven pts discontinued PEG-ASP due to hypersensitivity reactions and 5 discontinued due to hepatotoxicity, but other reported toxicities did not lead to PEG-ASP discontinuation and the majority of the pts completed all intended doses of PEG-ASP. This study suggests that with careful monitoring, PEG-ASP can safely be administered in adults ≥40 years of age. Disclosures Rajeeve: ASH-HONORS Grant: Research Funding. Tallman:UpToDate: Patents & Royalties; Oncolyze: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Delta Fly Pharma: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Rigel: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Cellerant: Research Funding; Tetraphase: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Nohla: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BioLineRx: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Orsenix: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; ADC Therapeutics: Research Funding; Biosight: Research Funding; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; KAHR: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Daiichi-Sankyo: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Geyer:Dava Oncology: Honoraria; Amgen: Research Funding. Park:Takeda: Consultancy; Allogene: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Autolus: Consultancy; GSK: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy; Kite Pharma: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy.

Long-Term Safety, Efficacy, and Survival Findings From Comfort-II, a Phase 3 Study Comparing Ruxolitinib with Best Available Therapy (BAT) for the Treatment of Myelofibrosis (MF)

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 801-801 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francisco Cervantes ◽  
Jean-Jacques Kiladjian ◽  
Dietger Niederwieser ◽  
Andres Sirulnik ◽  
Viktoriya Stalbovskaya ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Advisory Board ◽  
Extension Phase ◽  
Spleen Volume ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 801 Background: Ruxolitinib is a potent JAK1 & 2 inhibitor that has demonstrated superiority over traditional therapies for the treatment of MF. In the two phase 3 COMFORT studies, ruxolitinib demonstrated rapid and durable reductions in splenomegaly and improved MF-related symptoms and quality of life. COMFORT-II is a randomized, open-label study evaluating ruxolitinib versus BAT in patients (pts) with MF. The primary and key secondary endpoints were both met: the proportion of pts achieving a response (defined as a ≥ 35% reduction in spleen volume) at wk 48 (ruxolitinib, 28.5%; BAT, 0%; P < .0001) and 24 (31.9% and 0%; P < .0001), respectively. The present analyses update the efficacy and safety findings of COMFORT-II (median follow-up, 112 wk). Methods: In COMFORT-II, 219 pts with intermediate-2 or high-risk MF and splenomegaly were randomized (2:1) to receive ruxolitinib (15 or 20 mg bid, based on baseline platelet count [100-200 × 109/L or > 200 × 109/L, respectively]) or BAT. Efficacy results are based on an intention-to-treat analysis; a loss of spleen response was defined as a > 25% increase in spleen volume over on-study nadir that is no longer a ≥ 35% reduction from baseline. Overall survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: The median follow-up was 112 wk (ruxolitinib, 113; BAT, 108), and the median duration of exposure 83.3 wk (ruxolitinib, 111.4 [randomized and extension phases]; BAT, 45.1 [randomized treatment only]). Because the core study has completed, all pts have either entered the extension phase or discontinued from the study. The primary reasons for discontinuation were adverse events (AEs; ruxolitinib, 11.6%; BAT, 6.8%), consent withdrawal (4.1% and 12.3%), and disease progression (2.7% and 5.5%). Overall, 72.6% of pts (106/146) in the ruxolitinib arm and 61.6% (45/73) in the BAT arm entered the extension phase to receive ruxolitinib, and 55.5% (81/146) of those originally randomized to ruxolitinib remained on treatment at the time of this analysis. The primary reasons for discontinuation from the extension phase were progressive disease (8.2%), AEs (2.1%), and other (4.1%). Overall, 70 pts (48.3%) treated with ruxolitinib achieved a ≥ 35% reduction from baseline in spleen volume at any time during the study, and 97.1% of pts (132/136) with postbaseline assessments experienced a clinical benefit with some degree of reduction in spleen volume. Spleen reductions of ≥ 35% were sustained with continued ruxolitinib therapy (median duration not yet reached); the probabilities of maintaining the spleen response at wk 48 and 84 are 75% (95% CI, 61%-84%) and 58% (95% CI, 35%-76%), respectively (Figure). Since the last report (median 61.1 wk), an additional 9 and 12 deaths were reported in the ruxolitinib and BAT arms, respectively, resulting in a total of 20 (14%) and 16 (22%) deaths overall. Although there was no inferential statistical testing at this unplanned analysis, pts randomized to ruxolitinib showed longer survival than those randomized to BAT (HR = 0.52; 95% CI, 0.27–1.00). As expected, given the mechanism of action of ruxolitinib as a JAK1 & 2 inhibitor, the most common new or worsened grade 3/4 hematologic abnormalities during randomized treatment were anemia (ruxolitinib, 40.4%; BAT, 23.3%), lymphopenia (22.6%; 31.5%), and thrombocytopenia (9.6%; 9.6%). In the ruxolitinib arm, mean hemoglobin levels decreased over the first 12 wk of treatment and then recovered to levels similar to BAT from wk 24 onward; there was no difference in the mean monthly red blood cell transfusion rate among the ruxolitinib and BAT groups (0.834 vs 0.956 units, respectively). Nonhematologic AEs were primarily grade 1/2. Including the extension phase, there were no new nonhematologic AEs in the ruxolitinib group that were not observed previously (in ≥ 10% of pts), and only 1 pt had a new grade 3/4 AE (epistaxis). Conclusion: In COMFORT-II, ruxolitinib provided rapid and durable reductions in splenomegaly; this analysis demonstrates that these reductions are sustained over 2 years of treatment in the majority of pts. Ruxolitinib-treated pts showed longer survival than those receiving BAT, consistent with the survival advantage observed in previous (Verstovsek et al. NEJM. 2012) and current analyses of COMFORT-I, as well as with the comparison of pts of the phase 1/2 study with matched historical controls (Verstovsek et al. Blood. 2012). Disclosures: Cervantes: Sanofi-Aventis: Advisory Board, Advisory Board Other; Celgene: Advisory Board, Advisory Board Other; Pfizer: Advisory Board, Advisory Board Other; Teva Pharmaceuticals: Advisory Board, Advisory Board Other; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: AdvisoryBoard Other, Speakers Bureau. Kiladjian:Shire: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Research Funding. Niederwieser:Novartis: Speakers Bureau. Sirulnik:Novartis: Employment, Equity Ownership. Stalbovskaya:Novartis: Employment, Equity Ownership. McQuity:Novartis: Employment, Equity Ownership. Hunter:Incyte: Employment. Levy:Incyte: Employment, stock options Other. Passamonti:Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Barbui:Novartis: Honoraria. Gisslinger:AOP Orphan Pharma AG: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Vannucchi:Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Knoops:Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Harrison:Shire: Honoraria, Research Funding; Sanofi: Honoraria; YM Bioscience: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

Complete Molecular and Hematologic Response in Adult Patients with Relapsed/Refractory (R/R) Philadelphia Chromosome-Positive B-Precursor Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL) Following Treatment with Blinatumomab: Results from a Phase 2 Single-Arm, Multicenter Study (ALCANTARA)

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 679-679 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giovanni Martinelli ◽  
Hervé Dombret ◽  
Patrice Chevallier ◽  
Oliver G. Ottmann ◽  
Nicola Goekbuget ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Philadelphia Chromosome ◽  
Pcr Amplification ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
T315i Mutation ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Introduction. Prognosis of patients (pts) with R/R Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph+) ALL is dismal despite the introduction of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) which may be used as single agents or in combination regimens. Blinatumomab is a bispecific T-cell engaging (BiTE®) antibody construct that has shown antileukemic activity. Among adults with R/R Ph-negative ALL receiving blinatumomab, 43% achieved complete remission (CR) or CR with partial hematologic recovery (CRh) during the first two cycles (Topp MS et al. Lancet Oncol 2015;16:57). We evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of blinatumomab in pts with R/R Ph+ ALL who progressed after or were intolerant to a 2nd or later (2+) generation TKI. Methods. Eligible adult pts (≥18 years) had Ph+ B-precursor ALL and had relapsed after or were refractory to at least one 2+ generation TKI; or were intolerant to 2+ generation TKI and intolerant or refractory to imatinib. All pts had to have >5% blasts in the bone marrow and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≤ 2. Blinatumomab was dosed by continuous IV infusion (4 weeks on/2 weeks off) for up to 5 cycles (9 μg/d on days 1-7 in cycle 1, and 28 μg/d thereafter). The primary endpoint was CR or CRh during the first two cycles; minimal residual disease (MRD) response based on RT-PCR amplification of BCR-ABL per central laboratory, relapse-free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS), and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (alloHSCT) rate were key secondary endpoints. Complete MRD response was defined as no RT-PCR amplification of BCR-ABL at a sensitivity of 10-5. Results. Of 45 treated pts, 44 were resistant to 2+ generation TKI; one patient was resistant to imatinib and never exposed to 2+ generation TKI (protocol deviation). 53% of pts were men. Median (range) age was 55 (23-78) years (≥65 years, 27%). Ten pts (22%) had a BCR-ABL gene with T315I mutation. All pts had received prior TKI (dasatinib, 87%; ponatinib, 51%; imatinib, 56%; nilotinib, 36%; bosutinib, 2%), with 60% having received ≥ 2 prior 2+ generation TKI; most pts (96%) had received prior chemotherapy. 38% of pts had ≥ 2 prior relapses and 44% had prior alloHSCT. Efficacy outcomes for key endpoints are shown in the table. 16 pts achieved CR/CRh during the first two cycles for a response rate of 36% (95% CI: 22%, 51%); of those, 14 pts achieved CR, most of them (10/14, 71%) in cycle 1. The patient who never received 2+ generation TKI did not respond to treatment. 12 of the 14 pts (86%) with CR and two of the two pts with CRh achieved a complete MRD response. Among the 10 pts with T315I mutation, four achieved CR/CRh; all four also achieved a complete MRD response. Eight CR/CRh responders (50%) relapsed, three during treatment (including two with CR who did not achieve complete MRD response). One patient died in CR post alloHSCT. Median (95% CI) RFS was 6.7 (4.4, not estimable) months (median follow-up, 9.0 months); median OS was 7.1 (5.6, not estimable) months (median follow-up, 8.8 months). Patient incidence of grade ≥ 3 treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) was 82%, most commonly febrile neutropenia (27%), thrombocytopenia (22%), anemia (16%), and pyrexia (11%). Five pts had fatal AEs; one (septic shock) was considered treatment-related by the investigator. Three pts discontinued because of AEs. Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) occurred in three pts (all grade 1 or 2). 21 pts (47%) had neurologic events (paraesthesia, 13%; confusional state, 11%; dizziness, 9%; tremor, 9%); three pts had grade 3 neurologic events (aphasia, hemiplegia; and depressed level of consciousness and nervous system disorder), one of which (aphasia) required treatment interruption. Conclusion. In this population of pts with R/R Ph+ ALL who have very poor prognosis after failure of 2+ generation TKI therapy, treatment with CD19-targeted immunotherapy blinatumomab as single agent showed antileukemic activity. AEs were consistent with those previously reported for pts with R/R Ph-negative ALL treated with blinatumomab. Table 1. Table 1. Disclosures Martinelli: Novartis: Speakers Bureau; BMS: Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; ARIAD: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy; MSD: Consultancy. Dombret:Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Ottmann:Astra Zeneca: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Ariad: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Goekbuget:Bayer: Equity Ownership; Eusapharma/Jazz: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Erytech: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Medac: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Mundipharma: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; SigmaTau: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Kite: Consultancy; Gilead Sciences: Consultancy; Sanofi: Equity Ownership; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria. Topp:Astra: Consultancy; Regeneron: Consultancy; Affimed: Consultancy, Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Other: Travel Support; Jazz: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel Support. Fielding:Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria. Sterling:Amgen: Employment, Equity Ownership. Benjamin:Amgen: Employment, Equity Ownership. Stein:Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding.

scholarly journals A Phase I/II Study of Lenalidomide Plus Obinutuzumab in Relapsed Indolent Lymphoma

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 348-348 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nathan H Fowler ◽  
Loretta J. Nastoupil ◽  
Collin Chin ◽  
Paolo Strati ◽  
Fredrick B. Hagemeister ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Marginal Zone ◽  
Advisory Board ◽  
Indolent Lymphoma ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Grade 3

Background: Patients with advanced indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma (iNHL) can develop chemoresistance and most relapse following standard therapy. Although multiple treatment options exist, most are associated with short remission or intolerable side effects. Lenalidomide activates NK cells ± T cells and leads to in vivo expansion of immune effector cells in NHL models. The combination of rituximab and lenalidomide (R2) in relapsed iNHL is highly active and was recently approved. Obinutuzumab is a glycosylated type II anti-CD20 molecule with enhanced affinity for the FcγRIIIa receptors leading to improved ADCC. The primary objective of this phase I/II study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), safety, and efficacy of lenalidomide and obinutuzumab in relapsed indolent lymphoma. Methods: Patients with relapsed small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL), marginal zone, and follicular lymphoma (gr 1-3a) were eligible. Patients enrolled in three predefined dose cohorts of lenalidomide (10mg,15mg, 20mg) given on days 2-22 of a 28 day cycle. Obinutuzumab was given at a fixed dose (1000mg) IV on days 1,8,15 and 22 of cycle 1 and day 1 of subsequent cycles for 6 cycles. The combination was given for up to 12 cycles in responding pts. Antihistamines were given in pts who developed rash. Prophylactic growth factor was not allowed. In the absence of progression or toxicity, single agent obinutuzumab was continued every 2 months for maximum of 30 months on study. Traditional 3+3 dose escalation was used with dose limiting toxicities (DLT) assessed during cycle 1. Once the MTD was established, 60 additional patients were enrolled in the phase II portion of the study. Adverse events were graded using CTCAE version 4.03. Results: 66 pts were enrolled between May 2014 until March 2019, and all are eligible for safety and response assessment. No DLTs were observed in dose escalation, and 60 pts were enrolled in the phase II portion of the study at 20mg of lenalidomide daily. Histologies included follicular lymphoma (FL) n=57, marginal zone n=4, SLL n=5. The median age was 64 (36-81), with 2 (1-5) median prior lines of treatment. For 53% of pts, the combination represented the third or greater line of treatment. The overall response (OR) rate for all pts was 98% with 72% attaining a complete response (CR). Eighteen pts (27%) had a partial response, and stable disease was noted in 1 (2%). At a median follow up of 17 months, 14 pts have progressed, with an estimated 24mo progression-free survival (PFS) of 73% (57-83% 95% CI). The estimated 24 mo PFS for ≥ third line pts was 63%. Twenty five pts (38%) remain on treatment and 95% remain alive at last follow up. The most common grade ≥ 3 non-hematologic toxicities included fatigue (5 pts), rash (4 pts), and cough (3 pts). Grade ≥3 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia occurred in 11 (17%) and 7 (11%) pts respectively. Two pts stopped treatment due to adverse events, including 1 transient bradycardia and 1 grade 3 fatigue. Conclusion: The combination of 20 mg of lenalidomide and 1000mg obinutuzumab is safe and effective in patients with relapsed indolent lymphoma. Adverse events appeared similar to our prior experience with lenalidomide and rituximab and were generally well tolerated. Overall response rates were high, with many pts achieving prolonged remission, including pts who had relapsed after 2 or more lines of prior therapy. Validation studies in the frontline and salvage setting are ongoing. Disclosures Fowler: Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Consultancy; TG Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; ABBVIE: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Nastoupil:TG Therapeutics: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Spectrum: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria; Genentech, Inc.: Honoraria, Research Funding; Bayer: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding. Westin:Novartis: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding; Celgene: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding; Juno: Other: Advisory Board; Janssen: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding; Kite: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding; Unum: Research Funding; MorphoSys: Other: Advisory Board; Genentech: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding; Curis: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding; 47 Inc: Research Funding. Neelapu:Precision Biosciences: Consultancy; Merck: Consultancy, Research Funding; Cellectis: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy; BMS: Research Funding; Karus: Research Funding; Acerta: Research Funding; Poseida: Research Funding; Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy, Research Funding; Incyte: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Unum Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Allogene: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Cell Medica: Consultancy.

scholarly journals Blinatumomab in Combination with Pembrolizumab Is Safe for Adults with Relapsed or Refractory B-Lineage Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: University of California Hematologic Malignancies Consortium Study 1504

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 3880-3880 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marc Schwartz ◽  
Lloyd E. Damon ◽  
Deepa Jeyakumar ◽  
Caitlin L. Costello ◽  
Dimitrios Tzachanis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
High Bone ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Expansion Cohort

Clinical and preclinical findings suggest that PD-L1 overexpression on lymphoblasts and in the bone marrow microenvironment may mediate resistance to blinatumomab by inhibiting T-cell activation. We report preliminary findings from an ongoing phase I/II multicenter trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of blinatumomab with pembrolizumab in adults with relapsed or refractory (R/R) B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) and a high bone marrow lymphoblast percentage (NCT 03160079). The primary objective of this Phase I/II trial is to determine overall response rate (ORR = complete response (CR) + complete response with partial hematologic recovery (CRh) rate) after 1-2 cycles of blinatumomab with pembrolizumab, with key secondary endpoints of adverse events (AEs), minimal residual disease (MRD)-negative CR/CRh rate, 2-year disease-free and overall survival, and allogeneic HCT rate. Eligible patients are 18 years of age or older with R/R B-ALL after ≥ 1 prior line of therapy (including Philadelphia chromosome positive (Ph+) B-ALL failing one second or third generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor) and >50% lymphoblasts on screening bone marrow sample. Patients receive blinatumomab by continuous IV at 9 mcg/day on days 1-7 and 28 mcg/day on days 8-28 of cycle 1, then 28 mcg/day on days 1-28 in subsequent cycles. Pembrolizumab 200 mg IV is given on days 15 and 36 of each 42-day cycle. Patients in CR/CRh after 1-2 cycles complete a maximum of 5 cycles. A safety cohort of up to 6 patients assessed safety by 3+3 design. Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were defined as Grade 3 or 4 non-hematologic AEs related to the addition of pembrolizumab to blinatumomab with a DLT monitoring period of 28 days from the first pembrolizumab dose. At the time of this analysis, 5 patients have been enrolled and treated with all 5 completing the DLT monitoring period. Patients had a median age of 60 years (range 22-74) and one had Ph+ disease. Median bone marrow lymphoblast percentage at time of enrollment was 84% (range 53-90). Patients received a median of 1 cycle (range 1-3) of blinatumomab with pembrolizumab. Common AEs included fever, headache, increased bilirubin, nausea, neurotoxicity, and tachycardia. Grade 3-4 non-hematologic AEs included disseminated intravascular coagulation, hyperferritinemia, hypokalemia, subdural hematoma, encephalopathy, hyponatremia, and macrophage activation syndrome in 1 patient (all related to blinatumomab), hyperbilirubinemia and elevated AST in 1 patient, and hypertriglyceridemia in 1 patient. No grade 3 or greater immune-related AEs have occurred. No pembrolizumab-related DLTs occurred in the first 5 patients in the safety cohort and enrollment is now proceeding in the dose-expansion cohort. The ORR was 50% with 2/4 evaluable patients achieving a CR. One patient achieved an MRD-negative CR in cycle 1 and completed 3 cycles before proceeding to allogeneic HCT. One patient discontinued treatment due to subdural hemorrhage and macrophage activation syndrome during cycle 1 and achieved a CR. Both patients remain in CR for over 6 months. Two patients discontinued treatment due to refractory or progressive disease. The one patient not evaluable for response withdrew from study therapy after 1 cycle without ALL progression. Patient, disease, and treatment characteristics as well as outcomes are summarized in the Table. Blinatumomab with pembrolizumab is safe for adults with R/R B-ALL and a high bone marrow lymphoblast percentage. Enrollment continues in the dose-expansion cohort to assess efficacy. Disclosures Damon: Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Costello:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria, Research Funding. Schiller:Biomed Valley Discoveries: Research Funding; Astellas: Research Funding; Amgen: Other, Research Funding; Agios: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bristol Myer Squibb: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Constellation Pharmaceutical: Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Research Funding; Eli Lilly and Company: Research Funding; FujiFilm: Research Funding; Genzyme: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; J&J: Research Funding; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Research Funding; Karyopharm: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Onconova: Research Funding; Pfizer Pharmaceuticals: Equity Ownership, Research Funding; Sangamo Therapeutics: Research Funding. Wieduwilt:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen, Leadiant, Merck, Servier: Research Funding; Reata Pharmaceuticals: Equity Ownership; Daiichi Sankyo: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. OffLabel Disclosure: Pembrolizumab (given off label)to enhance the efficacy of blinatumomab (given on label) for relaped/refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia

scholarly journals A Single-Arm, Open-Label Phase 2 Pilot Study of Vyxeos (CPX-351) in Adults with Relapsed or Refractory Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 4399-4399
Author(s):  
Bijal D. Shah ◽  
Nicole Rozario ◽  
Elyce P. Turba ◽  
Celeste Bello ◽  
Julio C. Chavez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Tp53 Mutation ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Pilot Trial ◽  
Refractory Disease ◽  
Allogeneic Transplant ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Introduction: Vyxeos® is a liposomal formulation employing a 1:5 molar ratio of daunorubicin:cytarabine. Clinical trials in high risk acute myeloid leukemias demonstrated a significant benefit in CR rates and median OS, culminating in FDA approval August 2017. Emerging pediatric data suggest this benefit may extend to acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). The following pilot trial was performed to better understand the activity and toxicity profile in adults with relapsed and refractory ALL. Methods: Adults with ALL or mixed phenotype leukemia were eligible if &gt;5% lymphoblasts and/or extramedullary disease &gt;1x1cm. Induction consisted of Vyxeos 100 units/m2 on days 1, 3 and 5. Those with clinical benefit could receive up to 3 cycles of consolidation delivered at 65 units/m2 on days 1 & 3 after recovery of neutrophils (&gt;500 cells/uL) and platelets (&gt;50,000 cells/uL). Response: 11 patients (pts) have been treated to date, with median age of 39y (22-74y), 9 male, and 3 Caucasian. Six pts had B-ALL, including 1 B-myeloid. Four of 5 T-ALL pts had early T-cell precursor (ETP) phenotype. NGS was available in 9 pts, and included TP53 mutation (n=4), and PH-like changes (n=2). Median prior lines of therapy was 3, with 7 pts showing primary refractory disease. Prior blinatumomab, inotuzumab, CAR-T cell therapy, and allogeneic transplant were noted in 5, 2, 1, and 3 pts. Pancytopenia was uniform during induction, with febrile neutropenia noted in 9 pts. One pt passed from pneumonia after moving to comfort measures in lieu of intubation 20 days after Vyxeos, and is non-evaluable for response. A second pt developed grade 3 sepsis. The remainder of infections were grade 1-2. One pt had grade 3 gastrointestinal bleed, and 3 pts had grade 1 spontaneous subdural bleeding. One pt developed recurrent pericarditis in setting of anterior mediastinal mass. One case of veno-occlusive disease was observed in a pt with prior allogeneic transplant and inotuzumab. Median time to ANC recovery was 33.5 days among 10 evaluable pts. Two pts with refractory disease failed to recover platelets; among the remaining pts, median time to platelet recovery was 30.5 days. Adverse events were uncommon during consolidation, and include foot cellulitis and myopericarditis, each in 1 pt. Among 10 evaluable pts, 3 achieved CR/CRi, including 2 ETP T-ALL and one B-ALL. Two pts with TP53 mutation demonstrated &gt;50% blast reduction with hematologic recovery, allowing for prolonged time to subsequent therapy. Four pts received 1-3 cycles consolidation. One pt was bridged to donor leukocyte infusion. Responses were noted in only 2 pts after progression following Vyxeos, highlighting refractory status of those enrolled. Median PFS was 57 days (95%CI: 10, 105), time to next therapy 76 days (95%CI: 47, 105), and OS 223 days (95%CI: 144, 302). Conclusions Vyxeos in high-risk refractory adult ALL was overall well tolerated and active, with median OS of approximately 7.5 months in this pilot trial. Confirmation of benefit in a larger study is warranted, incorporating a second induction course and/or the addition of novel agents to further improve on remission rate and duration of response. Disclosures Shah: Incyte: Research Funding; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Servier Genetics: Other; BeiGene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Acrotech/Spectrum: Honoraria; Pharmacyclics/Janssen: Honoraria, Other: Expenses; Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Expenses, Research Funding; Precision Biosciences: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Other: Expenses; Pfizer: Consultancy, Other: Expenses; Bristol-Myers Squibb/Celgene: Consultancy, Other: Expenses; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Consultancy. Chavez: Astra Zeneca: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy; Merck: Research Funding; Morphosys: Speakers Bureau; Adaptive Biotech: Research Funding; ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Beigene: Speakers Bureau; Kite/Gilead: Consultancy; karyopharm: Consultancy; Epizyme: Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Consultancy. Sokol: Dren Bio: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kyowa-Kirin: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Lancet: Celgene/BMS: Consultancy; Millenium Pharma/Takeda: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; AbbVie: Consultancy; BerGenBio: Consultancy; ElevateBio Management: Consultancy; Agios: Consultancy; Astellas: Consultancy; Jazz: Consultancy. OffLabel Disclosure: Vyxeos is being evaluated in the described trial for the treatment of relapsed or refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia in adults.

scholarly journals Dose-Adjusted Intensive Chemotherapy Is Safe and Tolerable in Older Patients with Ph-Negative Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 5158-5158
Author(s):  
Anne S. Renteria ◽  
Sangeetha Venugopal ◽  
Bridget Marcellino ◽  
Alla Keyzner ◽  
Marina Kremyanskaya ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Older Patients ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Chemotherapy Regimen ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Intensive Chemotherapy ◽  
Advisory Committees

Abstract Background The outcomes of older adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) remain poor when compared to younger ALL patients [PMID 19897583, 28419558, 22409379, 10653870]. Asparaginase (Asp) induces death of human lymphoblasts, and effective asparagine depletion is associated with improved outcomes in ALL. PEG-Asparaginase (PEG-Asp), which has a longer half-life than Asp, is a key component of the intensive chemotherapeutic regimens utilized for treatment of pediatric and younger adult ALL [PMID 29450465]. Frequently, older patients with Ph-negative ALL are not offered PEG-Asp containing pediatric chemotherapy regimen because of concerns related to tolerability and safety in this population [PMID 28355969]. Methods The Adult Leukemia Program at Mount Sinai Hospital developed an age-based, dose-adjusted, CALGB 10403 based intensive chemotherapy regimen for adults (≥40 years) with a diagnosis of Ph-negative ALL. For patients up to 60 years, prednisone (PRD) dose was reduced from 60 to 40 mg/m2/day from D1 to D28, and PEG-Asp reduced from 2500 to 1000 units/m2 (D4). For patients aged 61 years and above, PRD was further reduced to 25 mg/m2/day, and PEG-Asp to 1000 units/m2 on D4. In CD20+ ALL, rituximab x 8 doses were added to the regimen. CNS-prophylaxis consisted of intrathecal methotrexate at D1, D8 and D29 during induction, and during subsequent courses of chemotherapy based on the CALGB 10403 protocol. A PEG-Asp oriented supportive care plan was developed to prevent and treat Asp-related adverse effects. After the administration of PEG-Asp, Antithrombin III (ATIII) and fibrinogen levels were monitored on the same day, twice a week, for at least two weeks. If ATIII levels were < 70% and/or fibrinogen levels < 120 mg/dL, levels were corrected with the administration of ATIII concentrate and/or cryoprecipitate, respectively. Results Twelve patients with a median age of 58 years (45 - 76) were evaluable, and three patients were ≥ 70 years. Nine patients had B-cell ALL and three T-cell ALL. Three patients had a white blood cell count > 30 x103/µL at diagnosis. An ECOG status ≤ 2 at diagnosis was described in all patients, and all of them had multiple complex cytogenetic and molecular abnormalities. Ten patients had significant co-morbidities at diagnosis, including diabetes, hypertension, previous history of cancer, coronary artery disease, obesity, alcohol related chronic pancreatitis, and chronic diarrhea. Nine out of the twelve patients (75%) attained a bone marrow morphological complete remission (CR) at the end of induction (EOI), three of them with detectable minimal residual disease (MRD) that became undetectable after completing course II. Of the three patients who had ≥5% bone marrow blasts at EOI, one attained a CR with undetectable MRD at the end of course IA and another when switched to blinatumomab, and the third one died of progressive disease. No patient experienced early death. Five patients underwent allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) while in CR (age range 46 to 60 years) and four remain in CR at last follow up (median 489 days, range 181 - 841), and one died of relapsed disease 67 days post-HCT. The other six patients who are receiving chemotherapy are alive and in remission at last follow up (median 272 days, range 52 - 639). The common adverse effects associated with PEG-Asp administration in this older group of patients were asymptomatic hypofibrinogenemia and depleted ATIII levels requiring supplementation (n=8), severe hyperbilirubinemia (n=1), and non-life-threatening venous thrombosis (n=1). Severe allergic reaction, clinical pancreatitis and cognitive impairment were not observed. Conclusion This age-based dose-adjusted PEG-Asp containing regimen was associated with an encouraging CR rate and a tolerable and manageable adverse event profile in this older patient population with significant co-morbidities. Treatment related mortality was 0%. Ten of 12 patients are currently in sustained remission, either with chemotherapy alone or following allogeneic HCT (median follow up 422 days, range 52 to 841 days). Treatment optimization for older patients with ALL utilizing an intensified, age-adjusted PEG-Asp containing induction and consolidation therapy regimen is associated with favorable outcomes and provides an effective bridge to potentially curative therapies such as HCT. Further prospective evaluation is under way. Table. Table. Disclosures Kremyanskaya: Incyte: Research Funding. Mascarenhas:Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Promedior: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Merck: Research Funding; CTI Biopharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document