scholarly journals A Phase I/II Study of Lenalidomide Plus Obinutuzumab in Relapsed Indolent Lymphoma

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 348-348 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nathan H Fowler ◽  
Loretta J. Nastoupil ◽  
Collin Chin ◽  
Paolo Strati ◽  
Fredrick B. Hagemeister ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Marginal Zone ◽  
Advisory Board ◽  
Indolent Lymphoma ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Grade 3

Background: Patients with advanced indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma (iNHL) can develop chemoresistance and most relapse following standard therapy. Although multiple treatment options exist, most are associated with short remission or intolerable side effects. Lenalidomide activates NK cells ± T cells and leads to in vivo expansion of immune effector cells in NHL models. The combination of rituximab and lenalidomide (R2) in relapsed iNHL is highly active and was recently approved. Obinutuzumab is a glycosylated type II anti-CD20 molecule with enhanced affinity for the FcγRIIIa receptors leading to improved ADCC. The primary objective of this phase I/II study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), safety, and efficacy of lenalidomide and obinutuzumab in relapsed indolent lymphoma. Methods: Patients with relapsed small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL), marginal zone, and follicular lymphoma (gr 1-3a) were eligible. Patients enrolled in three predefined dose cohorts of lenalidomide (10mg,15mg, 20mg) given on days 2-22 of a 28 day cycle. Obinutuzumab was given at a fixed dose (1000mg) IV on days 1,8,15 and 22 of cycle 1 and day 1 of subsequent cycles for 6 cycles. The combination was given for up to 12 cycles in responding pts. Antihistamines were given in pts who developed rash. Prophylactic growth factor was not allowed. In the absence of progression or toxicity, single agent obinutuzumab was continued every 2 months for maximum of 30 months on study. Traditional 3+3 dose escalation was used with dose limiting toxicities (DLT) assessed during cycle 1. Once the MTD was established, 60 additional patients were enrolled in the phase II portion of the study. Adverse events were graded using CTCAE version 4.03. Results: 66 pts were enrolled between May 2014 until March 2019, and all are eligible for safety and response assessment. No DLTs were observed in dose escalation, and 60 pts were enrolled in the phase II portion of the study at 20mg of lenalidomide daily. Histologies included follicular lymphoma (FL) n=57, marginal zone n=4, SLL n=5. The median age was 64 (36-81), with 2 (1-5) median prior lines of treatment. For 53% of pts, the combination represented the third or greater line of treatment. The overall response (OR) rate for all pts was 98% with 72% attaining a complete response (CR). Eighteen pts (27%) had a partial response, and stable disease was noted in 1 (2%). At a median follow up of 17 months, 14 pts have progressed, with an estimated 24mo progression-free survival (PFS) of 73% (57-83% 95% CI). The estimated 24 mo PFS for ≥ third line pts was 63%. Twenty five pts (38%) remain on treatment and 95% remain alive at last follow up. The most common grade ≥ 3 non-hematologic toxicities included fatigue (5 pts), rash (4 pts), and cough (3 pts). Grade ≥3 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia occurred in 11 (17%) and 7 (11%) pts respectively. Two pts stopped treatment due to adverse events, including 1 transient bradycardia and 1 grade 3 fatigue. Conclusion: The combination of 20 mg of lenalidomide and 1000mg obinutuzumab is safe and effective in patients with relapsed indolent lymphoma. Adverse events appeared similar to our prior experience with lenalidomide and rituximab and were generally well tolerated. Overall response rates were high, with many pts achieving prolonged remission, including pts who had relapsed after 2 or more lines of prior therapy. Validation studies in the frontline and salvage setting are ongoing. Disclosures Fowler: Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Consultancy; TG Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; ABBVIE: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Nastoupil:TG Therapeutics: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Spectrum: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria; Genentech, Inc.: Honoraria, Research Funding; Bayer: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding. Westin:Novartis: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding; Celgene: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding; Juno: Other: Advisory Board; Janssen: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding; Kite: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding; Unum: Research Funding; MorphoSys: Other: Advisory Board; Genentech: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding; Curis: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding; 47 Inc: Research Funding. Neelapu:Precision Biosciences: Consultancy; Merck: Consultancy, Research Funding; Cellectis: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy; BMS: Research Funding; Karus: Research Funding; Acerta: Research Funding; Poseida: Research Funding; Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy, Research Funding; Incyte: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Unum Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Allogene: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Cell Medica: Consultancy.

scholarly journals A Phase I-II Study of the Combination of Bendamustine and Pomalidomide with Dexamethasone in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma.

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 1857-1857 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cristina Gasparetto ◽  
Michael Green ◽  
Anandgopal Srinivasan ◽  
Yubin Kang ◽  
David A. Rizzieri ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Advisory Board ◽  
High Response ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Refractory Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Background Bendamustine, a bifunctional mechlorethamine derivative with alkylating properties and pomalidomide, an IMiD® immunomodulatory agent, have both demonstrated efficacy as single agents or in combination with dexamethasone in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma(RRMM). Bendamustine in combination with lenalidomide, thalidomide, and bortezomib have had high response rates and good tolerability. We combined bendamustine and pomalidomide with dexamethasone (Ben-Pom-d) and hypothesized that this regimen would be highly effective in patients with RRMM. Dose-escalation started with 120mg/m2 bendamustine/3mg pomalidomide [or 4mg in the cohort 2]/40 mg dexamethasone using a standard 3+3 schema based on dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) occurring in cycle 1. The MTD was 120mg/m2 bendamustine/3mg pomalidomide/40 mg dexamethasone. Here, we report our findings to date from the phase I/II trial of Ben-Pom-d in patients with RRMM (NCT01754402). Methods The primary objective of the phase I portion was to determine the MTD. Data for overall response, progression free survival, and overall survival, includes all patients treated on the phase I and II portions of the study. All patients had to be refractory to prior lenalidomide, and must have relapsed or were refractory to their most recent therapy. Patients had to be pomalidomide naïve. Treatment consisted of oral pomalidomide once daily on days 1-21, intravenous (IV) bendamustine given over 30 minutes on day 1 and dexamethasone 40 mg on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 of a 28-day cycle. Adverse events (AEs) were graded by NCI-CTCAE v4. Response was assessed by the modified International Uniform Response Criteria. Results A total of 9 patients were enrolled in the phase I portion. The MTD was the starting dose level (bendamustine 120 mg/m2, pomalidomide 3mg, dexamethasone 40 mg). In Phase II we enrolled an additional 16 patients resulting in a total study population of 25 patients evaluable for toxicity and 22 for efficacy, with 6 still receiving treatment. The median age was 65 years (range 43-81), 46% were male. The median number of prior regimens was 3 (range 2-6), median time from diagnosis is 3.9 years (range 1.1-9.10 years), 88% of patients had a prior stem cell transplant, 100% had prior bortezomib, 20% had prior carfilzomib and all were lenalidomide-refractory. Fifteen patients had high risk cytogenetic, including 8 patients with del17. Patients received a median of 6 cycles of therapy (range 1-18 cycles). Best response assessments in 22 evaluable patients for efficacy, showed 5 (23%) VGPR, 12 (55%) PR, 3 (14%) MR, and 2 (9%) SD, for an ORR of 77% and a ≥MR rate of 91%. The median follow-up of survivors is 10 months (range: 2-19+ months). Median PFS and OS were 4.5 months (range 1-15+ months) and 9.5 months (range 2-19+ months), respectively, for the entire cohort with 13 of 22 still alive in follow-up. The Median PFS for patient with del 17 is 5.5 months (range 2-15 months) with >MR rate of 88%. During the first cycle, 3 patients of all 25 evaluable enrolled experienced a DLT at the different doses, including 1 nausea/vomiting [cohort 1], and 2 with rash and fever in cohort 2. The therapy was tolerated well, but toxicities reported at any point while on therapy included 32% grade 4 neutropenia, 16% grade 4 thrombocytopenia, and half the patients requiring delay of subsequent cycles due to cytopenias and 17 of 22 (77%) had a dose reduction of pomalidomide per protocol guidelines at some point in the continuation cycles. The major non-hematologic Grade ≥3 drug-related AEs that occurred included febrile neutropenia in 12%, grade 3 mucositis in 8%, grade 3 pneumonia 16% and grade 4%, and grade 4 sepsis 4%. Conclusions The Ben-Pom-d regimen is a well-tolerated regimen and achieves a high response rate (ORR of 77%; ≥MR rate of 91%) in a heavily pre-treated Lenalidomide-refractory population with prior bortezomib exposure. Therapy is ongoing for many and longer follow-up is needed to better assess the true durability of this approach. Disclosures Gasparetto: Onyx: Honoraria, Other: Advisory Board; Millennium/takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; teva: Other: spouse-ad board and speaker bureau. Off Label Use: Bendamustine-pomalidomide-dexa for treatment of relapsed myeloma. Rizzieri:Teva: Other: ad board, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Other: ad board, Speakers Bureau. Rao:novartis: Other: ad board; amgen: Other: ad board; Boehringer-Ingelheim: Other: Advisory Board. Tuchman:celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Millennium/takeda: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

A Phase I Study of Vorinostat, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone In Patients with Relapsed or Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Excellent Tolerability and Promising Activity In a Heavily Pretreated Population

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 1951-1951 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Richardson ◽  
Donna Weber ◽  
Constantine S. Mitsiades ◽  
Meletios A. Dimopoulos ◽  
Jean-Luc Harousseau ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Advisory Board ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 1951 Background: Although novel treatment combinations for multiple myeloma (MM) have improved outcomes, the disease remains incurable and new drug combinations are urgently needed. Vorinostat is an oral histone deacetylase inhibitor approved in the United States for treatment of patients (pts) with advanced cutaneous T-cell lymphoma who failed prior therapies. Vorinostat alters gene expression and protein activity, promoting MM cell death through multiple pathways, and has been shown in preclinical studies to synergistically enhance the anti-MM activity of bortezomib and immunomodulatory drugs, including lenalidomide, with or without dexamethasone. Aims: The primary objective of this Phase I study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of vorinostat plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone in pts with relapsed or relapsed and refractory MM. Secondary objectives included overall safety, tolerability, response rate, duration of response, and time to progression (TTP). Methods: Pts in this Phase I multicenter open-label study were sequentially enrolled into 1 of 5 escalating doses of the combination regimen using a standard 3 + 3 design for ≤8 cycles. Pts who tolerated treatment and experienced clinical benefit were eligible for enrollment in an extension phase. Toxicity was evaluated using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria (version 3.0). Response was assessed using the modified European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation criteria and International Myeloma Working Group Uniform Criteria. Safety and efficacy data were analyzed using summary statistics, except for TTP, which was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: As of July 15, 2010, 31 pts were treated and evaluable for toxicity; 4 pts remain on study. Most pts had received prior thalidomide (n=22; 71%), bortezomib (n=20; 65%), or lenalidomide (n=14; 45%), with a median of 4 prior therapies (range, 1–10). The patient population contained both high-risk and low-risk pts, based on cytogenetic and/or fluorescence in situ hybridization analyses. Most adverse events (AEs) were mild or moderate in severity. The most common grade ≥3 treatment-related AEs, experienced by 19 (61%) pts, were neutropenia (26%), thrombocytopenia (16%), diarrhea (13%), anemia (10%), and fatigue (10%); 8 pts discontinued due to toxicity. One dose-limiting toxicity (grade 3 diarrhea lasting >48 h) was observed at the maximum assessed dose (level 5), but MTD was not reached (Table) and there were no treatment-related deaths. Among 30 pts evaluable for response, the median TTP was 32 weeks (5 mo), and 4 pts remain on study as of the data cutoff date; 26 of 30 pts (87%) have achieved at least stable disease (SD). Best single responses included 2 complete responses, 3 very good partial responses (VGPR), 11 partial responses (PR), and 5 minimal responses (MR), with 5 pts achieving SD and 4 developing progressive disease, resulting in an overall response rate (ORR; PR or better) of 53%. Of 13 evaluable pts who had previously received lenalidomide, a best single response of SD or better was observed in 9 (69%; 2 VGPR, 3 PR, 1 MR, 3 SD), resulting in a 38% ORR. Notably, SD or better (2 PR, 1 MR, 3 SD) was observed in 60% of 10 evaluable pts who were relapsed, refractory, or intolerant to previous lenalidomide-containing regimens. Conclusions: Preliminary data from this Phase I study suggest that vorinostat plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone is a convenient and generally well-tolerated regimen with promising activity for relapsed or relapsed and refractory MM. The MTD for this combination was not reached. Importantly, responses were observed in pts who had received prior lenalidomide, bortezomib, and thalidomide. Further evaluation of this regimen is planned in future trials. Disclosures: Richardson: Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millenium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Johnson & Johnson: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Off Label Use: Vorinostat, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone for treatment in Multiple Myeloma. Weber:Novartis-unpaid consultant: Consultancy; Merck- unpaid consultant: Consultancy; Celgene- none for at least 2 years: Honoraria; Millenium-none for 2 years: Honoraria; Celgene, Millenium, Merck: Research Funding. Mitsiades:Millennium: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; Merck & Co.: Consultancy, Honoraria; Kosan Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pharmion: Consultancy, Honoraria; Centrocor: Consultancy, Honoraria; PharmaMar: Patents & Royalties; OSI Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Amgen Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; AVEO Pharma: Research Funding; EMD Serono: Research Funding; Sunesis: Research Funding; Gloucester Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Genzyme: Research Funding. Dimopoulos:MSD: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Harousseau:Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Houp:Merck Research Laboratories: Employment. Graef:Merck Research Laboratories: Employment. Gause:Merck Research Laboratories: Employment. Byrne:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Anderson:Millennium Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Onyx: Consultancy; Merck: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Acetylon: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Siegel:Celgene and Millennium: Advisory Board, Speakers Bureau; Merck: Advisory Board.

Long-Term Safety, Efficacy, and Survival Findings From Comfort-II, a Phase 3 Study Comparing Ruxolitinib with Best Available Therapy (BAT) for the Treatment of Myelofibrosis (MF)

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 801-801 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francisco Cervantes ◽  
Jean-Jacques Kiladjian ◽  
Dietger Niederwieser ◽  
Andres Sirulnik ◽  
Viktoriya Stalbovskaya ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Advisory Board ◽  
Extension Phase ◽  
Spleen Volume ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 801 Background: Ruxolitinib is a potent JAK1 & 2 inhibitor that has demonstrated superiority over traditional therapies for the treatment of MF. In the two phase 3 COMFORT studies, ruxolitinib demonstrated rapid and durable reductions in splenomegaly and improved MF-related symptoms and quality of life. COMFORT-II is a randomized, open-label study evaluating ruxolitinib versus BAT in patients (pts) with MF. The primary and key secondary endpoints were both met: the proportion of pts achieving a response (defined as a ≥ 35% reduction in spleen volume) at wk 48 (ruxolitinib, 28.5%; BAT, 0%; P < .0001) and 24 (31.9% and 0%; P < .0001), respectively. The present analyses update the efficacy and safety findings of COMFORT-II (median follow-up, 112 wk). Methods: In COMFORT-II, 219 pts with intermediate-2 or high-risk MF and splenomegaly were randomized (2:1) to receive ruxolitinib (15 or 20 mg bid, based on baseline platelet count [100-200 × 109/L or > 200 × 109/L, respectively]) or BAT. Efficacy results are based on an intention-to-treat analysis; a loss of spleen response was defined as a > 25% increase in spleen volume over on-study nadir that is no longer a ≥ 35% reduction from baseline. Overall survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: The median follow-up was 112 wk (ruxolitinib, 113; BAT, 108), and the median duration of exposure 83.3 wk (ruxolitinib, 111.4 [randomized and extension phases]; BAT, 45.1 [randomized treatment only]). Because the core study has completed, all pts have either entered the extension phase or discontinued from the study. The primary reasons for discontinuation were adverse events (AEs; ruxolitinib, 11.6%; BAT, 6.8%), consent withdrawal (4.1% and 12.3%), and disease progression (2.7% and 5.5%). Overall, 72.6% of pts (106/146) in the ruxolitinib arm and 61.6% (45/73) in the BAT arm entered the extension phase to receive ruxolitinib, and 55.5% (81/146) of those originally randomized to ruxolitinib remained on treatment at the time of this analysis. The primary reasons for discontinuation from the extension phase were progressive disease (8.2%), AEs (2.1%), and other (4.1%). Overall, 70 pts (48.3%) treated with ruxolitinib achieved a ≥ 35% reduction from baseline in spleen volume at any time during the study, and 97.1% of pts (132/136) with postbaseline assessments experienced a clinical benefit with some degree of reduction in spleen volume. Spleen reductions of ≥ 35% were sustained with continued ruxolitinib therapy (median duration not yet reached); the probabilities of maintaining the spleen response at wk 48 and 84 are 75% (95% CI, 61%-84%) and 58% (95% CI, 35%-76%), respectively (Figure). Since the last report (median 61.1 wk), an additional 9 and 12 deaths were reported in the ruxolitinib and BAT arms, respectively, resulting in a total of 20 (14%) and 16 (22%) deaths overall. Although there was no inferential statistical testing at this unplanned analysis, pts randomized to ruxolitinib showed longer survival than those randomized to BAT (HR = 0.52; 95% CI, 0.27–1.00). As expected, given the mechanism of action of ruxolitinib as a JAK1 & 2 inhibitor, the most common new or worsened grade 3/4 hematologic abnormalities during randomized treatment were anemia (ruxolitinib, 40.4%; BAT, 23.3%), lymphopenia (22.6%; 31.5%), and thrombocytopenia (9.6%; 9.6%). In the ruxolitinib arm, mean hemoglobin levels decreased over the first 12 wk of treatment and then recovered to levels similar to BAT from wk 24 onward; there was no difference in the mean monthly red blood cell transfusion rate among the ruxolitinib and BAT groups (0.834 vs 0.956 units, respectively). Nonhematologic AEs were primarily grade 1/2. Including the extension phase, there were no new nonhematologic AEs in the ruxolitinib group that were not observed previously (in ≥ 10% of pts), and only 1 pt had a new grade 3/4 AE (epistaxis). Conclusion: In COMFORT-II, ruxolitinib provided rapid and durable reductions in splenomegaly; this analysis demonstrates that these reductions are sustained over 2 years of treatment in the majority of pts. Ruxolitinib-treated pts showed longer survival than those receiving BAT, consistent with the survival advantage observed in previous (Verstovsek et al. NEJM. 2012) and current analyses of COMFORT-I, as well as with the comparison of pts of the phase 1/2 study with matched historical controls (Verstovsek et al. Blood. 2012). Disclosures: Cervantes: Sanofi-Aventis: Advisory Board, Advisory Board Other; Celgene: Advisory Board, Advisory Board Other; Pfizer: Advisory Board, Advisory Board Other; Teva Pharmaceuticals: Advisory Board, Advisory Board Other; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: AdvisoryBoard Other, Speakers Bureau. Kiladjian:Shire: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Research Funding. Niederwieser:Novartis: Speakers Bureau. Sirulnik:Novartis: Employment, Equity Ownership. Stalbovskaya:Novartis: Employment, Equity Ownership. McQuity:Novartis: Employment, Equity Ownership. Hunter:Incyte: Employment. Levy:Incyte: Employment, stock options Other. Passamonti:Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Barbui:Novartis: Honoraria. Gisslinger:AOP Orphan Pharma AG: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Vannucchi:Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Knoops:Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Harrison:Shire: Honoraria, Research Funding; Sanofi: Honoraria; YM Bioscience: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

scholarly journals Pediatric-Inspired Chemotherapy Incorporating Pegaspargase Is Safe and Results in High Rates of MRD Negativity in Adults Ages 18-60 with Philadelphia Chromosome-Negative Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia and Lymphoblastic Lymphoma

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 4013-4013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark Blaine Geyer ◽  
Ellen K. Ritchie ◽  
Arati V. Rao ◽  
M. Isabella Cazacu ◽  
Shreya Vemuri ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Philadelphia Chromosome ◽  
Advisory Board ◽  
Lymphoblastic Lymphoma ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Introduction: Among adolescents and young adults with (w/) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) or lymphoblastic lymphoma (LBL), treatment using a pediatric (vs. adult) regimen appears to achieve superior event-free (EFS) and overall survival (OS); this observation has driven increased interest in adapting pediatric regimens for middle-aged adults w/ ALL/LBL. However, greater risk of toxicities associated w/ asparaginase complicates administration of pediatric-inspired regimens in adults. We therefore designed a pediatric-inspired chemotherapy regimen w/ doses of pegaspargase (PEG) rationally synchronized to limit overlapping toxicities w/ other chemotherapeutic agents. Methods: We conducted a phase II multi-center trial in adults ages 18-60 w/ newly-diagnosed Philadelphia chromosome-negative (Ph-) ALL/LBL (NCT01920737). Pts w/ Ph+ ALL or Burkitt-type ALL were ineligible. The treatment regimen consisted of 2-phase induction (I-1, I-2), followed by consolidation w/ 2 courses of alternating high-dose methotrexate-based intensification and reinduction, followed by 3 years of maintenance (Figure 1). PEG 2000 IU/m2 was administered in each of the 6 intensive courses of induction/consolidation at intervals of ≥4 weeks. Minimal residual disease (MRD) was assessed in bone marrow (BM) by multiparameter flow cytometry (FACS) on day (d) 15 of I1 and following I-1 and I-2. Any detectable MRD (even <0.01% of BM WBCs) was considered positive. Toxicities were assessed by CTCAE v4.0. Results: 39 pts were enrolled (30M, 9F), w/ B-ALL (n=28), T-ALL (n=7), B-LBL (n=3), and T-LBL (n=5). Median age at start of treatment was 38.3 years (range 20.2-60.4), w/ 18 pts age 40-60. Grade 3-4 toxicities associated w/ PEG are summarized in Table 1. Grade 3-4 hyperbilirubinemia was observed post-PEG in I-1 in 9 pts, but only recurred thereafter in 1/8 pts resuming PEG. Pts completing consolidation on protocol (n=16) received median of 6 doses of PEG (range, 2-6). Four pts developed hypersensitivity to PEG and subsequently received Erwinia asparaginase. PEG was discontinued in 4 additional pts due to hepatotoxicity (n=2), pancreatitis (n=1), and physician preference (n=1). Of pts w/ available response assessments, 35/36 (97%) achieved morphologic complete response (CR) or CR w/ incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi) following I-1 (n=34) or I-2 (n=1). Both pts not achieving CR/CRi after I-I had early T-precursor ALL; one of these pts was withdrawn from study, and the other (w/ M2 marrow after I-1) achieved CR after I-2. Of the pts w/ ALL (excluding LBL) w/ available BM MRD assessments, 11/28 (39%) achieved undetectable MRD by FACS following I-1; 18/22 (82%) achieved undetectable MRD by FACS following I-2. Of the pts w/ LBL w/ available BM MRD assessments, 7/7 (100%) achieved or maintained undetectable MRD by FACS following I-1 and I-2. Ten pts underwent allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) in CR1. Seven pts experienced relapse at median 15.2 months from start of treatment (range, 5.4-30.4), of whom 6 subsequently underwent 1st (n=5) or 2nd (n=1) alloHCT. Of the 11 pts w/ ALL w/ undetectable MRD following I-1, only one has relapsed. Five patients have died, including 2 pts in CR1 (from sepsis and multi-organ system failure), and 3 pts in relapse. At median follow-up of 22.3 months among surviving pts (range, 1.0-48.1), median EFS and OS (Figure 2A&B) have not been reached (EFS not censored at alloHCT). 3-year EFS was 62.1% (95% CI: 38.4-78.9%) and 3-year OS was 80.0% (95% CI: 57.5-91.4%). Conclusions: PEG can be incorporated into pediatric-inspired chemotherapy regimens w/ manageable toxicity for appropriately selected adults up to age 60 w/ Ph- ALL/LBL. While PEG-related AEs are common, few pts require permanent discontinuation of asparaginase. Grade 3-4 hyperbilirubinemia was common, particularly post-I-1, but recurred infrequently when PEG was continued. Two induction courses resulted in a high rate of MRD negativity post-I-2 and translated to a low rate of relapse. Though further follow-up is required, 3-year EFS is encouraging. Data regarding asparaginase enzyme activity and silent inactivation w/ neutralizing anti-PEG antibody will be presented. Ongoing and future studies will additionally investigate whether incorporating novel therapies (e.g. blinatumomab, nelarabine) into frontline consolidation therapy may reduce risk of relapse among adults receiving PEG-containing regimens. Disclosures Geyer: Dava Oncology: Honoraria. Ritchie:Celgene: Consultancy, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses, Speakers Bureau; NS Pharma: Research Funding; Incyte: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; ARIAD Pharmaceuticals: Speakers Bureau; Astellas Pharma: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding. Rao:Kite, a Gilead Company: Employment. Tallman:Daiichi-Sankyo: Other: Advisory board; AROG: Research Funding; Cellerant: Research Funding; AbbVie: Research Funding; BioSight: Other: Advisory board; Orsenix: Other: Advisory board; ADC Therapeutics: Research Funding. Douer:Shire: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Gilead Sciences: Consultancy; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Pfizer: Honoraria; Spectrum: Consultancy. Park:Kite Pharma: Consultancy; Juno Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Shire: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Consultancy.

scholarly journals Ibrutinib Plus Obinutuzumab and Venetoclax in Relapsed/Refractory Mantle Cells Lymphoma Patients, Results of the OASIS Phase I Clinical Trial

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 4158-4158 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven Le Gouill ◽  
Franck Morschhauser ◽  
Krimo Bouabdallah ◽  
Guillaume Cartron ◽  
Rene-Olivier Casasnovas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Drug Resistance ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Median Time ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Clinical Relapse ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Background. Mantle Cell Lymphoma (MCL) drug resistance are highly dependent on B-cell-receptor signaling, Bcl-2 and the microenvironment. Ibrutinib inhibits both tumor cell proliferation and binding to the microenvironment. Venetoclax is a Bcl-2 inhibitor and Bcl-2 family members like Mcl-1 and Bcl-xL confers resistance to Venetoclax and are upregulated by the tumor microenvironment but downregulated by Ibrutinib (Touzeau, 2011, Chiron, 2015). Ibrutinib plus venetoclax has recently demonstrated high efficacy in relapsed/refractory (R/R) MCL (Tam et al NEJM 2018). Preclinical investigations show that microenvironment-dependent long-term expansion and drug resistance to venetoclax are counteracted by obinutuzumab (type II glycoengineered humanized anti-CD20 antibody) and obinutuzumab/venetoclax/ibrutinib is highly active against primary MCL cells. (Chiron Blood 2016). All together these findings gave the rational to investigate Obinutuzumab/Ibrutinib (step A) and Obinutuzumab/Venetoclax/Ibrutinib (step B) combinations. The OAsIs trial (NCT02558816) has been designed to assess the safety, tolerability and efficacy of these two combos in R/R MCL. DLTs were assessed during the first 2 months (step A) and 3 months (step B) of treatment. Methods: Oasis is a multicenter, non-randomized, phase I study. Step A evaluates the safety of obinutuzumab (1000mg IV C1D1, 8,15, C2-6 D1 and every 2 months until C24) plus Ibrutinib (560mg/d until progression) (n=9). Step B primary objective is to determine the MTD of obinutuzumab/venetoclax/ibrutinib. Venetoclax is administered from C2 (C2W1 100mg/d, C2W2 200mg/d, C2W3 400mg/d and C2W4-C6: 400, 600 or 800mg/d). A continual reassessment method is used to allocate venetoclax doses (3 patients-pts- per dose-level). Enrolment in step A and B for R/R MCL started in November 2015 and October 2016, respectively. Results. Step A (Obinutuzumab/Ibrutinib) (n=9). Median age at inclusion was 64y (range 58-82) and median lines of treatment prior to inclusion is 1 (1-4), including ASCT in 7 patients and allo-SCT in one case. Median time from diagnosis to C1D1 is 46.5m (18.4-103). Two pts presented with blastoid variant. One of nine step A patients presented TP53 mutation. Median time from diagnosis to C1D1 is 46.5m (18.5-103). During the first 3 months of treatment, there was no clinically relevant non-hematological grade 3-4 AEs. Eight grade 3-4 hematological AEs were reported in 4 pts (lymphopenia 4 ; neutropenia 4 ; thrombocytopenia 1). One patient progressed at end of C2 and died few weeks later while 7 (87%) were in CR according to Lugano criteria at end of C6. MRD status was assessed by ASO qPCR targeted to clonal immunoglobulin rearrangements in 6 /9 step A pts (one progressed before C6, data missing = 2). Of these, 4 were MRD negative in both blood and bone marrow after C6 (one remained MRD pos with no clinical relapse and underwent allo-SCT, one was not evaluated in BM). At the 12 months time point, the 3 evaluated pts remained MRD negative. With a median follow-up of 23,5m (8,9-31.6), 8 pts are alive (6 completed the 2y treatment program and are in CR). Step B (Obinutuzumab/ Ibrutinib/Venetoclax; Ven 400mg (n=3); at Ven=600mg (n=3) and Ven=800mg (n=6)). Median age at inclusion is 64.5y (range 45-74). Median lines of treatment prior inclusion is 2 (1-3), including ASCT in 8 patients. Five pts presented with blastoid MCL. TP53 status was assessed in 3/10 pts (2 ongoing). Of these 10, 3 presented TP53 mutations. Median time from diagnosis to C1D1 is 50.2m (12.8-123). The median follow-up for living pts (n=8) is 6.5m (2.5-15). During the first three months of treatment, there was no clinically relevant non-hematological grade 3-4 AEs. Twenty-nine grade 3-4 hematological AEs were reported in 7 pts (febrile neutropenia 1, neutropenia 4 ; thombopenia 4, anemia 2 and lymphopenia 3). At end of C2 , 3 achieved CR, 5 PR and 4 pts had PD. Among 9 pts assessed after C6, 5 patients were in CR (MRD analysis ongoing) Conclusion. No DLT has been reported in both step A and B. Both combinations are well tolerated and provide high disease control including CR at the molecular level. Oasis step C (obinutuzumab/venetoclax/ibrutinib) for untreated MCL pts is now open for inclusion since July 2018. Disclosures Le Gouill: Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy, Honoraria. Morschhauser:BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Other: Scientific Lectures; Epizyme: Consultancy; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Cartron:Sanofi: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Gilead Sciences: Honoraria; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria. Gastinne:Millennium/Takeda: Honoraria. Davies:Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Acerta Pharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Gilead Sciences, Inc.: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; GSK: Research Funding; ADC-Therapeutics: Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria; Karyopharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Herbaux:Gilead Sciences, Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria. Rule:Kite: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celltrion: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead Sciences, Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

scholarly journals Metabolic PET/CT Analysis of Aggressive Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Prior to Axicabtagene Ciloleucel CAR-T Infusion: Predictors of Progressive Disease, Survival, and Toxicity

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 2518-2518
Author(s):  
William Breen ◽  
Jason R. Young ◽  
Matthew Hathcock ◽  
Roman O. Kowalchuk ◽  
Radhika Bansal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Advisory Board ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Non Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Pet Ct ◽  
Car T ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Purpose: Axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) is an anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy utilized for patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) refractory to at least 2 lines of therapy. F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) is used to evaluate disease extent prior to CAR-T infusion at two time points: pre-leukapheresis (pre-leuk) approximately 6 weeks prior to CAR-T infusion, and pre-lymphodepletion chemotherapy (pre-LD) approximately 1 week prior to CAR-T infusion. We hypothesized that PET/CT characteristics beyond Lugano criteria, such as metabolic tumor volume (MTV), total lesion glycolysis (TLG), SUV maximum (SUVMax), and changes in these parameters from pre-leuk to pre-LD, may predict for progressive disease (PD), death, and treatment toxicity after CAR-T infusion. Methods: Patients with NHL who received axi-cel on a prospective registry at Mayo Clinic Rochester were included. Lesions on pre-leuk and pre-LD PET/CT scans were segmented with a fixed absolute SUVMax threshold of 2.5 using a semi-automated workflow (LesionID, MIM Software Inc.) with manual modification to exclude physiologic uptake as needed. MTV, TLG, SUVMax, number of lesions, and other lesion characteristics were assessed for each PET/CT, and changes from pre-leuk to pre-LD were calculated. Lesions were categorized as either nodal, spleen, bone, parenchymal (i.e. liver, lung), or soft tissue (i.e. subcutaneous, muscle), and MTV was calculated for each category. Univariate Cox modeling was used to associate relative and directional change in metabolic and volumetric PET/CT characteristics with PD and death, after adjusting for bridging therapy. LASSO method was used for multivariable model selection. Pre-LD PET/CT characteristics were also assessed for association with presence and duration of cytokine release syndrome (CRS), grade 3+ immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), tocilizumab (toci) use, and corticosteroid use. Results: From 2018-2020, axi-cel was delivered to 69 patients. Histology included diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (57%), transformed follicular lymphoma (23%), or high-grade lymphoma (19%). Pre-leuk and pre-LD PET/CT scans were performed a median of 46 days and 7 days prior to CAR-T infusion, respectively. Forty patients (58%) received bridging therapy between scans, including 9 (13%) receiving radiotherapy. At a median follow-up of 13 months, 39 (57%) had died and 46 (67%) had PD. Sixty patients (87%) developed CRS following CAR-T infusion for a median duration of 5 days. Presence of pre-LD parenchymal disease was associated with longer duration CRS (p=0.032). Thirty-seven patients (54%) developed ICANS for a median duration of 4.5 days, including 12 (32%) with grade 3+ ICANS. Greater pre-LD total MTV was associated with higher risk of grade 3+ ICANS (p=0.042). Greater pre-LD SUVMax was associated with longer duration ICANS (p=0.032). Nineteen (28%) patients required toci. Greater pre-LD total MTV, SUVMax, TLG, and volume of the largest lesion were associated with increased use of toci (p&lt;0.05 for all). Greater pre-LD total MTV and TLG of the largest lesion were associated with increased use of corticosteroid (p&lt;0.05 for each). While no individual pre-leuk or pre-LD PET/CT characteristics were associated with risk of PD or death, increases from pre-leuk to pre-LD in total MTV, total TLG, parenchymal MTV, and nodal MTV were associated with increased risk of PD (Figure 1). Similarly, increases from pre-leuk to pre-LD in parenchymal MTV, nodal MTV, TLG of the largest lesion, and total number of lesions were associated with increased risk of death (p&lt;0.05 for all). LASSO analysis identified increasing extranodal MTV (≥25% increase) and increasing TLG of the largest lesion (≥10% increase) as strong predictors of death (AUC 0.74, Table 1). Kaplan-Meier plots were generated for overall and progression-free survival using these risk factors (Figure 2). Additional patients and follow-up will be presented. Conclusions: Patients with greater pre-LD MTV had higher risk of grade 3+ ICANS and use of toci or corticosteroids. Increasing metabolic disease burden during CAR-T manufacturing is associated with increased risk of PD and death. A two variable risk score using increasing extranodal disease and increasing TLG of the largest lesion may stratify prognosis prior to CAR-T and inform treatment paradigms. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Bennani: Verastem: Other: Advisory Board; Purdue Pharma: Other: Advisory Board; Daichii Sankyo Inc: Other: Advisory Board; Kyowa Kirin: Other: Advisory Board; Vividion: Other: Advisory Board; Kymera: Other: Advisory Board. Paludo: Karyopharm: Research Funding. Wang: Genentech: Research Funding; LOXO Oncology: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Eli Lilly: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; InnoCare: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; MorphoSys: Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Ansell: Bristol Myers Squibb, ADC Therapeutics, Seattle Genetics, Regeneron, Affimed, AI Therapeutics, Pfizer, Trillium and Takeda: Research Funding. Lin: Gamida Cell: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Legend: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Sorrento: Consultancy; Bluebird Bio: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy, Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Vineti: Consultancy; Juno: Consultancy.

scholarly journals Updated Results of a Phase 2 Study of Modified Lenalidomide, Bortezomib, and Dexamethasone (RVd-lite) in Transplant-Ineligible Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 3178-3178 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth K. O'Donnell ◽  
Jacob P. Laubach ◽  
Andrew J. Yee ◽  
Robert Redd ◽  
Carol Ann Huff ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Advisory Board ◽  
Future Perspective ◽  
Low Grade ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Grade 3

PURPOSE: This updated analysis examined survival outcomes after 60 months of follow-up in patients with transplant-ineligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) treated with the 3-drug regimen of modified lenalidomide-bortezomib-dexamethasone (RVD lite) in this population. METHODS: RVD lite was administered over a 35-day cycle. Lenalidomide 15 mg was given orally days 1-21; bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2 once weekly subcutaneously (SC) on days 1, 8, 15, and 22; dexamethasone 20 mg orally day of and after bortezomib for 9 cycles followed by 6 cycles of consolidation. Eligibility requirements included ECOG performance status ≤ 2 and acceptable hepatic, renal, and hematologic function. Primary objective was to evaluate overall response rate (ORR). Secondary objectives included evaluation of safety, progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and the pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of intravenous (IV) and SC bortezomib. RESULTS: Fifty-three eligible patients enrolled between 4/17/13 and 7/25/15; 50 received at least one dose of therapy. As previously reported, the median age at study entry was 72 years (range 65-91). ISS stage was I in 19 (38%), II in 17 (34%), and III in 14 (28%) pts. Fatigue was the most commonly reported toxicity occurring in 37 (74%) and was mostly grade 1 or 2 in 29 (58%). Other grade 3 or greater toxicities included hypophosphatemia in 17 (34%), neutropenia in 7 (14%), and rash in 5 (10%) pts. Low grade peripheral neuropathy was reported in 31 (62%) patients with only 1 patient experiencing grade 3 symptoms. There were statistically significant improvements in scores of physical functioning (p=0.013), future perspective (p=0.023) and disease symptoms (p=0.001). Patients reported fewer symptoms across all symptom domains with the exception of diarrhea. The ORR was 86% and 66% of patients achieved a very good partial response (VGPR) or better. The median time to response was 1.1 months. At a follow-up of 61 months, median PFS was 41.9 months (95% CI, 31.2 - ∞) and median OS not reached. The 5-year overall survival was 61.3%. Sixty-six percent of patients received lenalidomide maintenance. CONCLUSIONS: RVD lite is a well-tolerated and highly effective regimen in the transplant-ineligible population with robust PFS and OS. Our data demonstrate that the benefits of more effective combination strategies observed in younger, fitter, transplant-eligible patients can be effectively used in older, transplant-ineligible patients with modifications in dose and schedule, without compromising efficacy. Disclosures O'Donnell: Celgene: Consultancy; Sanofi: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy. Yee:Takeda: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Adaptive: Consultancy; Karyopharm: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria. Huff:Karyopharm, Sanofi, MiDiagnostics: Consultancy; Member of Safety Monitoring Board for Johnson and Johnson: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Schlossman:Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited: Employment. Munshi:Celgene: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Adaptive: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Oncopep: Consultancy. Anderson:Gilead Sciences: Other: Advisory Board; Janssen: Other: Advisory Board; Sanofi-Aventis: Other: Advisory Board; OncoPep: Other: Scientific founder ; C4 Therapeutics: Other: Scientific founder . Richardson:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Karyopharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Oncopeptides: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Raje:Merck: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Celgene Corporation: Consultancy; Amgen Inc.: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy.

Open-Label, Multicenter, Phase 1b Study of Daratumumab in Combination with Pomalidomide and Dexamethasone in Patients with at Least 2 Lines of Prior Therapy and Relapsed or Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 508-508 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ajai Chari ◽  
Sagar Lonial ◽  
Attaya Suvannasankha ◽  
Joseph W. Fay ◽  
Bertrand Arnulf ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Institutional Research ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Multicenter Phase ◽  
Phase 1B ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Introduction : Daratumumab (DARA) is a human anti-CD38 IgG1κ monoclonal antibody with remarkable safety and activity as monotherapy in heavily treated relapsed and refractory (RR) multiple myeloma (MM) (Lokhorst HM. J Clin Oncol 2014;32 Suppl:abstr 8513. Lonial S. J Clin Oncol 2015;33 Suppl:abstr LBA8512). DARA has demonstrated clinical activity in combination with lenalidomide (LEN) and dexamethasone (D) in relapsed or RR MM (Plesner T. Blood 2014;124(21):84). This ongoing 4-arm, multicenter, phase 1b study (NCT01998971) evaluated the safety and efficacy of DARA in combination with various backbone therapies and pomalidomide plus D (POM-D). Results in newly diagnosed patients treated with DARA and backbone therapies were previously reported (Mateos MV, et al. Haematologica 2015;100(s1):84). Methods : Patients in the DARA + POM-D arm had relapsed or RR MM with ≥2 prior lines of therapy including ≥2 consecutive cycles of LEN and bortezomib. During 28-day treatment cycles patients received DARA 16 mg/kg qw for 2 cycles, then q2w for 4 cycles, and q4w until disease progression (PD). Pomalidomide 4 mg was administered qd for 21 days with D 40 mg qw (20 mg for patients >75 years of age). The primary endpoint was safety and tolerability of DARA in combination with POM-D. Overall response rate (ORR) was a secondary endpoint. Disease responses were evaluated by an independent data safety monitoring board. Results: A total of 77 patients were enrolled into the DARA + POM-D arm. The median (range) age was 64 (35-86) years and the median number of prior therapies was 3.5 (2-10). Sixty-five percent of the patients were refractory to bortezomib, 30% to carfilzomib, 88% to lenalidomide, and 65% to both a PI and IMiD. With a median (range) duration of follow-up of 72 (1-423) days, 28 (36%) patients have discontinued treatment due to PD (15 [20%]), adverse events (AEs; 6 [8%]), death or physician's decision (3 [4%] each), and one (1%) patient withdrawal. The median (range) duration of treatment was 69 days (1-416), and the median (range) number of infusions was 7.5 (1-25). Forty-nine (64%) patients continue on study treatment and enrollment is ongoing. There was little additional toxicity when DARA was added to POM-D other than DARA-specific infusion related reactions (IRRs; 47/77 patients). Most occurred on Cycle 1 Day 1 (45/47 patients), and the most common (>10%) IRRs were chills (13%), cough (13%), and dyspnea (11%). The most common (>10%) and grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs) are presented in Table 1. Five patients died within 30 days of receiving study treatment due to AEs (4[5%]) or progressive disease (1 [1%]). In 53 patients with >1 post-baseline assessment, the ORR was 58.5%, with 3 stringent complete responses (sCR), 1 complete response (CR), 12 very good partial responses (VGPR), 15 partial responses (PR), 2 minimal responses, 18 stable disease, and 2 PD. Many responses deepened over time. Median (range) time to first response was 30 (28-92) days. After a median follow-up of 148 days, 4 out of 31 responders developed PD. Among the evaluable double refractory patients (n = 40), there was 1 sCR, 1 CR, 10 VGPRs, and 11 PRs with an ORR of 57.5%. Conclusions : The addition of DARA to POM-D was well tolerated and did not result in additional toxicities with the exception of DARA-related infusion reactions. Deep and durable responses were observed quickly, along with a high response rate. Study enrollment is ongoing and data will be updated at the meeting. Table 1. Most Common (>10%) Adverse Events (N = 77) Adverse Event, n (%) Any Grade Grade ≥3 Neutropenia 42 (54.5%) 39 (50.6%) Anemia 28 (36.4%) 16 (20.8%) Fatigue 28 (36.4%) 4 (5.2%) Cough 24 (31.2%) 0 Nausea 21 (27.3%) 0 Dyspnea 20 (26.0%) 5 (6.5%) Diarrhea 19 (24.7%) 1 (1.3%) Leukopenia 19 (24.7%) 12 (15.6%) Thrombocytopenia 17 (22.1%) 8 (10.4%) Pyrexia 16 (20.8%) 1 (1.3%) Dizziness 15 (19.5%) 0 Chills 14 (18.2%) 0 Nasal Congestion 14 (18.2%) 0 Upper Respiratory Tract Infection 14 (18.2%) 1 (1.3%) Back Pain 13 (16.9%) 2 (2.6%) Constipation 13 (16.9%) 0 Tremor 13 (16.9%) 2 (2.6%) Insomnia 12 (15.6%) 1 (1.3%) Lymphopenia 11 (14.3%) 7 (9.1%) Muscle Spasms 11 (14.3%) 0 Vomiting 11 (14.3%) 0 Arthralgia 9 (11.7%) 1 (1.3%) Pruritus 9 (11.7%) 0 Throat Irritation 9 (11.7%) 0 Anxiety 8 (10.4%) 0 Headache 8 (10.4%) 0 Hypertension 8 (10.4%) 4 (5.2%) Musculoskeletal Chest Pain 8 (10.4%) 2 (2.6%) Peripheral Edema 8 (10.4%) 1 (1.3%) Disclosures Chari: Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Millennium/Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Array Biopharma: Consultancy, Other: Institutional Research Funding, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Biotest: Other: Institutional Research Funding; Onyx: Consultancy, Research Funding. Lonial:Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Millennium: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Onyx: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding. Suvannasankha:Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Onyx: Honoraria, Research Funding. Arnulf:Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Qin:Janssen: Employment. Masterson:Janssen: Employment. Nottage:Janssen: Employment. Schecter:Janssen: Employment. Ahmadi:Janssen: Employment. Weiss:Janssen and Millennium: Consultancy; Janssen and Onclave: Research Funding. Krishnan:Millenium: Speakers Bureau; BMS: Consultancy; Jazz: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Onyx: Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Lentzsch:Celgene: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Axiom: Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy.

scholarly journals A Phase I/II Trial of Brentuximab Vedotin (BV) Plus Rituximab (R) As Frontline Therapy for Patients with Immunosuppression-Associated CD30+ and/or EBV+ Lymphomas

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 351-351 ◽  
Author(s):  
William Pearse ◽  
Barbara Pro ◽  
Leo I. Gordon ◽  
Reem Karmali ◽  
Jane N. Winter ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Peripheral Neuropathy ◽  
T Cell ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Advisory Board ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Lymphoid Malignancies ◽  
Frontline Therapy

Background: Immunocompromised patients (pts) face an approximate 6-fold increase in lifetime risk of lymphoid malignancies compared with immunocompetent counterparts. Additionally, up to 80% of post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD) cases are driven by EBV-associated mechanisms of tumorigenesis. Approximately 70% will express CD30 and over 80% will express CD20. Recent studies of chemoimmunotherapy (CIT) have reported median overall survival (OS) of 2-4 years and treatment-related mortality (TRM) rates of 13-50%. Moreover, solid organ transplant (SOT) pts are at significant risk of graft rejection when CIT is employed, possibly due to "off target" depletion of regulatory T-cell populations. R monotherapy induction, followed by response-stratified use of CIT, has been evaluated (Trappe, et al, JCO, 2016). However, ~75% of pts had an inadequate response to R alone and required subsequent CIT; 2-yr OS for the population as a whole was ~70%. BV is an anti-CD30 antibody-drug conjugate that received accelerated FDA approval for previously untreated CD30+ T-cell lymphoma and Hodgkin lymphoma. We hypothesized that a combination of BV and R would yield improved breadth and depth of response compared with R monotherapy induction, would spare pts subsequent exposure to CIT, and result in favorable OS. Methods: We report here results of a phase I/II multicenter study investigating the efficacy and safety of BV+R as frontline therapy in pts diagnosed with immunosuppression-associated CD30+ and/or EBV+ lymphoid malignancies. Induction consisted of R 375 mg/m2 given days 1, 8, 15, 22 and BV 1.2 mg/kg given days 1, 8, 15, of a 28-day cycle, followed by restaging. Those with progression were removed from study. Pts with stable disease were offered study discontinuation or completion of one consolidation cycle followed by repeat disease assessment. Pts with partial response or complete response (CR) could receive either consolidation followed by maintenance therapy (MT) or move directly to MT without consolidation. Consolidation was identical to induction dosing; MT consisted of BV 1.8 mg/kg every 3 weeks and R 375 mg/m2 every 6 weeks for up to 1 year of therapy. Toxicity was defined using CTCAE 4.0 and response (Cheson, 2007) was assessed at the end of induction, consolidation (if given), and after cycles 4 and 7 of BV. Results: A total of 22 pts were entered in the trial. Toxicity and response data are available for 20 pts. Median age was 67 years (range, 30-79) and 14 pts (64%) were male (range, 30-79 years). Fourteen pts (64%) had received either a SOT or hematopoietic allograft requiring immunosuppression, 3 pts required immunosuppression for underlying rheumatologic conditions, and 3 pts were found to have EBV-associated lymphoid malignancies in the absence of iatrogenic immunosuppression (Table 1). Overall response rate was 70%, including a CR rate of 60%. With median follow-up of 26.1 month, the probability of progression-free survival at 1 year was 75.2% and 67.6% at 3 years (Fig 1). Probability of OS was 89.2% at both 1-year and 3-year follow-up (Fig 1). Median time to best response was 28 days. Three pts withdrew consent after induction, 2 pts died (1 death related to treatment), and 1 patient was lost to follow-up. Seven pts (31%) required dose adjustments or delay of medication administration during induction therapy and 45% required discontinuation of therapy due to toxicity within 1 year. The most frequent grade 3/4 toxicities were peripheral neuropathy, neutropenia, lymphopenia, and pancreatitis. The most frequent adverse events of any grade were fatigue, nausea, abdominal pain, pancytopenia, and peripheral neuropathy (Table 2). Conclusions: The combination of BV + R had an acceptable safety profile and appeared effective in achieving early remissions when used as frontline therapy for PTLD and other immunosuppression-related lymphomas. Specifically, over half of pts achieved CR, and 75% have been spared exposure to multi-agent cytotoxic chemotherapy. Furthermore, survival and PFS data were encouraging compared with historical controls. However, nearly half of pts discontinued therapy within 1 year due to toxicity suggesting poor long-term tolerance of the regimen and that earlier cessation of therapy may be warranted. Further studies are needed to confirm these efficacy results and to determine optimal BV+R dosing regimens and durations. Disclosures Pro: Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel Expenses, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel Expenses; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Kyowa Hakka Kirin: Consultancy, Honoraria. Gordon:Gilead: Other: Advisory Board; Bayer: Other: Advisory Board; Juno/Celgene: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding; Zylem LLC: Other: co-founder; research in nanoparticles in cancer. Karmali:Gilead/Kite; Juno/Celgene: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Astrazeneca: Speakers Bureau; Takeda, BMS: Other: Research Funding to Institution. Winter:Merck: Consultancy, Research Funding. Ma:Astra Zeneca: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Xeme: Research Funding; Bioverativ: Consultancy; Beigene: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Kite: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Genentech: Consultancy; Abbvie: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Juno: Research Funding; Acerta: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding. Behdad:Pfizer: Other: Speaker; Thermo Fisher: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Loxo-Bayer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Petrich:AbbVie: Employment, Equity Ownership. Smith:Portola Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding.

scholarly journals Ixazomib or Lenalidomide Maintenance Following Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation and Ixazomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone (IRD) Consolidation in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma: Results from a Large Multi-Center Randomized Phase II Trial

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 602-602 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ravi Vij ◽  
Thomas G. Martin ◽  
Nitya Nathwani ◽  
Mark A. Fiala ◽  
Feng Gao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Interim Analysis ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Advisory Board ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Grade 3

Background: Maintenance therapy with lenalidomide post-autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) has shown to improve progression-free survival (PFS) in multiple myeloma (MM), and has largely become the standard of care. However, toxicity leads to early discontinuation in nearly one-third of patients and additional options are needed (McCarthy, et al, JCO, 2017). Ixazomib is another maintenance option that has been shown to improve PFS; however, studies comparing lenalidomide and ixazomib are lacking. In this randomized phase 2 study, we analyzed the safety and efficacy of using lenalidomide and ixazomib as part of consolidation and maintenance therapies after ASCT (NCT02253316). Methods: Eligible patients, age 18-70 with newly diagnosed MM undergoing ASCT during first-line treatment, were consented prior to ASCT. Approximately 4 months following ASCT, patients received 4 cycles of consolidation therapy with IRd [ixazomib 4 mg on days 1, 8 and 15 of a 28-day cycle, lenalidomide 15 mg on days 1 through 21, and dexamethasone 40 mg on days 1, 8 and 15]. Primary data on IRd consolidation were presented at ASH 2018 (Abstract 109920). One month after the last consolidation cycle, patients were randomized (1:1) to maintenance therapy with single-agent ixazomib (4 mg on days 1, 8 and 15 of a 28-day cycle) or lenalidomide (10 mg daily months 1-3 followed by 15 mg for months 4+). The arms were stratified based on MRD-status post-consolidation. In total, 237 patients were enrolled from 10 US centers. This abstract coincides with planned interim analysis 3 which is the first comparison of ixazomib and lenalidomide maintenance. While the study was not powered to compare PFS between the two arms, the sample will provide a reasonable power to estimate non-inferiority. There is a planned stopping rule for non-inferiority set at a hazard ratio of &gt;1.3 in favor of lenalidomide. Secondary end-points include MRD-negativity following 12 cycles and toxicity. Results: At time of abstract submission, 215 patients had completed IRd consolidation and 191 had begun maintenance. 90 were randomized to ixazomib and 94 to lenalidomide. 7 patients were not randomized due to toxicity during consolidation; data from these patients are not included in the analyses. The characteristics of the two arms are summarized in Table 1. Hematologic toxicity has been infrequent with ixazomib with neutropenia and thrombocytopenia occurring in 11% and 23% of patients. In comparison, neutropenia and thrombocytopenia occurred in 45% and 35% of patients on lenalidomide. The most common non-hematologic toxicities in both arms have been GI-related and infections, both expected events. 16% of patients on ixazomib have experienced Grade 3-4 non-hematologic toxicity compared to 34% on lenalidomide. No grade 3 or higher peripheral neuropathy has been reported in either arm. 11% of patients on ixazomib have discontinued due to toxicity and another 9% have required a dose reduction to 3mg. Lenalidomide toxicity has led to discontinuation in 15% of patients and another 12% were dose reduced to 5mg. Only 45% of patients receiving 4+ cycles of lenalidomide were able to titrate to the 15mg dose. After a median follow-up of 11.2 months from randomization (19.7 months post-ASCT), 30% of patients on ixazomib have discontinued treatment due to disease progression. After a median follow-up of 12.3 months from randomization (20.2 months post-ASCT), 18% patients on lenalidomide have discontinued treatment due to disease progression. Conclusion: Ixazomib and lenalidomide maintenance have been well tolerated to date. A comparison of PFS is currently being conducted as part of interim analysis 3 and final results will be presented, representing the first report directly comparing lenalidomide and ixazomib maintenance. Table 1: Disclosures Vij: Genentech: Honoraria; Karyopharm: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria. Martin:Amgen, Sanofi, Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Roche and Juno: Consultancy. Fiala:Incyte: Research Funding. Deol:Novartis: Other: Advisory board; Kite: Other: Advisory board; Agios: Other: Advisory board. Kaufman:Celgene: Consultancy; Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University: Employment; Amgen: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie: Consultancy; Janssen: Honoraria; Incyte: Consultancy; Karyopharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; TG Therapeutics: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy. Hofmeister:Karyopharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Oncopeptides: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria; Nektar: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Imbrium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Gregory:Poseida: Research Funding; Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Speakers Bureau. Berdeja:AbbVie Inc, Amgen Inc, Acetylon Pharmaceuticals Inc, Bluebird Bio, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Celgene Corporation, Constellation Pharma, Curis Inc, Genentech, Glenmark Pharmaceuticals, Janssen Biotech Inc, Kesios Therapeutics, Lilly, Novartis, Poseida: Research Funding; Poseida: Research Funding; Amgen Inc, BioClinica, Celgene Corporation, CRISPR Therapeutics, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Janssen Biotech Inc, Karyopharm Therapeutics, Kite Pharma Inc, Prothena, Servier, Takeda Oncology: Consultancy. Chari:Amgen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Millennium/Takeda: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Array Biopharma: Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Research Funding; Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Oncoceutics: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Rosko:Vyxeos: Other: Travel support.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document