scholarly journals One-Day Low-Dose Etoposide Is an Effective Chemomobilization Regimen with Minimal Toxicity for Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients with Multiple Myeloma: A Multicenter Study from Tertiary Hospitals in Korea

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 3347-3347
Author(s):  
Yong Park ◽  
Dae Sik Kim ◽  
Ka-Won Kang ◽  
Byung-Hyun Lee ◽  
Eun Sang Yu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cells ◽  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Febrile Neutropenia ◽  
Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Peripheral Blood ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Tertiary Hospitals ◽  
Stem Cell Collection

Abstract Purpose Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is widely used as a part of induction treatment for transplantation-eligible patients with multiple myeloma. For successful ASCT, mobilizing hematopoietic stem cells from bone marrow to peripheral blood is essential because collecting a sufficient number of stem cells using apheresis is mandatory. As a method for mobilization, chemomobilization consisting of high-dose chemotherapy plus granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) or G-CSF alone (G-mobilization) has been used. However, the mobilization failure still remains a problematic issue. Given repeated mobilization attempts increase medical costs and the risk of morbidity related with apheresis, the mobilization process should be efficient. Chemomobilization is more effective than G-mobilization, however, chemomobilization has the risk of complication such as febrile neutropenia or chemotherapy-induced second malignancy. Thus, we compared the efficacy and safety of our new chemomobilization regimen, one-day low-dose etoposide with that of two-day low-dose etoposide, one-day high-dose cyclophosphamide, and G-mobilization. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 234 patients who underwent ASCT for MM between 2008 and 2018 in four tertiary hospitals in Korea. One-day low-dose etoposide regimen (E1) was the intravenous (IV) administration of etoposide (375 mg/m2) over 4 hours whereas two-day low-dose etoposide (E2) was the same dose of etoposide on 1st and 2nd day in outpatient clinic. G-CSF administration was started around on 10th day until the end of collection. In G-mobilization regimen (G), the injection of G-CSF was started four days (day -4) before initiation of apheresis (day 0), and G-CSF once a day was maintained untill the end of collection. One-day high-dose cyclophosphamide regimen (C) was the IV administration of cyclophosphamide (3.5 g/m2) on 1st day and the daily injection of G-CSF from 2nd day until the end of stem cell collection. Peripheral blood stem cell collection was started when CD34-positive cells or hematopoietic progenitor cells were more than 5000/μL in peripheral blood, or white blood cell count was more than 5000/μL. In this study, we defined the 'adequate mobilization' as CD34-positive cells more than 4ⅹ106/kg, and 'mobilization failure' as a collected CD34-positive cells less than 2ⅹ106/kg. Neutrophil and platelet engraftment was defined as more than 500/μL and 20,000/μL on consecutive two days, respectively. Results 31 patients received single dose etoposide (E1) between 2016 and 2018 whereas 28 patients received double dose etoposide (E2) between 2011 and 2018. The other two regimens were used in 105 (C, 2008-2015) and 70 patients (G, 2008-2017) according to physicians' decision. The comparison of four regimens showed the median CD34-positive cells of E1 regimen was 5.57ⅹ106/kg that was comparable to that of E2 and C (Table 1). The number of CD34-positive cells on 1st day of apheresis was 4.03ⅹ106/kg in E1 regimen, and it was higher than that of C and G (3.32 and 1.79ⅹ106/kg, respectively). As a result, E1 regimen achieved 'adequate mobilization' in 100% of patients (n=30) like E2 regimen (n=28, 100%). Mobilization failure did not occur in E1 and E2 regimens whereas 4-10% of patients experienced mobilization failure in C and G regimens (Table 1). All patients receiving E1 and E2 regimen but one patient in E1 could collect more than 4ⅹ106/kg of CD34-positive cells within three cycles of apheresis. The occurrence of febrile neutropenia was extremely lower in E1 regimen (7%) than E2 and C regimens (43% and 34%, respectively, p<0.001). Both neutrophil and platelet engraftment were the fastest in E1 (the median 9 days after ASCT, p<0.001). Conclusions One-day low-dose etoposide administration could be effective for chemomobilization in myeloma patients with reduced risk of complication compared to two-day low-dose etoposide, high-dose cyclophosphamide and G-mobilization. Table 1. Table 1. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Ex-Vivo Expanded Peripheral Blood Stem Cells (EVEC) Compared with Un Manipulated Peripheral Blood Stem Cells (PBSC) Autologous Transplantation for Multiple Myeloma: A Pair Match Analysis.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 502-502 ◽  
Author(s):  
Noel-Jean Milpied ◽  
Gerald Marit ◽  
Bernard Dazey ◽  
Jean-Michel Boiron ◽  
Zoran Ivanovic ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cells ◽  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Peripheral Blood ◽  
Ex Vivo ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Peripheral Blood Stem Cells ◽  
Cd34 Cells ◽  
Blood Stem Cells

Abstract Abstract 502 Autologous stem cell transplantation with PBSC after high-dose chemotherapy remains standard therapy for patients with symptomatic Multiple Myeloma (MM). Strategies to minimize complications could significantly reduce the morbidity of that procedure. One possibility could be to shorten the duration of induced neutropenia through the injection of an ex-vivo expanded graft. Nineteen patients (pts) received EVEC after high-dose Melphalan (HDM) (200 mg/m2) as the only graft. The ex-vivo expanded procedure has been described elsewhere (Boiron et al. Transfusion 2006 and Ivanovic et al. Transfusion 2006). Briefly, thawed peripheral blood CD 34+ cells collected after G-CSF mobilisation and selected with immunomagnetic devices were incubated for 10 days in a serum free medium (Maco Biotech HP01) with Stem Cell Factor (Amgen), G-CSF (Amgen) and TPO (Amgen: 7 pts; Cellgenix:12 pts). The expanded cells were then thoroughly washed and injected 48h after the HDM injection. The ex-vivo expansion lead to a median fold of 5,4 for CD34+ cells (1,3-11,8); 118 for CD33+ (1-703880); 3386 for CD14+ (4-101075); 28,5 for CD13+ (10-703880) and 13 for CFUs (6-21). The median N° of CD34+ cells injected was 14×10e6/kg (5,3-48). The results of these transplants were compared to those achieved in 38 pts who received unmanipulated PBSC after HDM. Pts and controls were matched for age, sex, stage of the disease, first line chemotherapy ( VAD or VD) status of the disease at time of transplant, year of transplant, time between diagnosis and transplant, CD34+ mobilisation technique (HD cytoxan + G-CSF or G-CSF alone) and the median N° of total nucleated cells and of CD34+ collected. The results are summarized on the table: There was no secondary neutropenia in the patients who received EVEC. With a median FU of the entire cohort of 30 m, the median OS for pts who received their first transplant with EVEC and with PBSC is 69 m and not reached respectively (p=NS), the median PFS is 18 m and 27 m (p = NS) and the median time to progression is 14 m and 15 m (p=NS). Conclusion: EVEC is feasible, safe and reduce significantly the morbidity of autologous stem cell transplantation after HDM for multiple myeloma. Disclosures: Milpied: Amgen France: Honoraria.

Transplantation of Peripheral Blood Stem Cells Mobilized by Chemotherapy and Single Dose Pegylated G-CSF in Patients with Multiple Myeloma: Equivalence of 6 mg and 12 mg Pegfilgrastim.

Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 2868-2868 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ingmar Bruns ◽  
Ulrich Steidl ◽  
Christof Scheid ◽  
Kai Hübel ◽  
Roland Fenk ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cells ◽  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Single Dose ◽  
Peripheral Blood ◽  
High Dose Chemotherapy ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Cytotoxic Therapy ◽  
Cd 34 ◽  
Cd34 Cells

Abstract To date the most effective treatment for patients (pts) with multiple myeloma consists of conventional induction chemotherapy followed by either single or tandem high-dose chemotherapy and autologous blood stem cell transplantation. Collection of sufficient numbers of hematopoietic stem cells is essential for high-dose chemotherapy. Current regimens for stem cell mobilization are based on daily subcutaneous injections of human recombinant G-CSF starting shortly after cytotoxic therapy. Here we examined the use of polyethyenglycole (PEG)-conjugated G-CSF (pegfilgrastim) at two different doses in patients with stage II or III multiple myeloma. Patients received induction therapy with 2–4 cycles ID or VAD. Following cytotoxic therapy with cyclophosphamide (4g/m2) we administered either a single dose of 6 mg pegfilgrastim (n=10 pts; median age: 55 years), 12 mg pegfilgrastim (n=12 pts; median age: 51 years) or daily doses of 8,5 μg/kg unconjugated G-CSF (filgrastim) (n=12 pts; median age: 51 years). The growth factor was given on day 4 (range 2–5 days) in the “6 mg pegfilgrastim group”, on day 5 (range 2–7 days) in the “12 mg pegfilgrastim group” and on day 4 (range 3–6 days) in the “filgrastim group” after cyclophosphamide. Numbers of CD34+ cells were determined during leukocyte recovery and harvested by large volume apheresis using a cobe spectra blood cell separator. Pegfilgratim was associated with an earlier leukocyte recovery both at the 6mg dose (median 12 days, range 8–16 days) and the 12mg dose (median 12 days, range 7–16 days) as compared to filgrastim (median 14 days, range 11–15 days, p=0.04). Similarily, the peripheral blood CD34+ cell peak occurred earlier in patients who received pegfilgrastim (median 12 days, range 11–18 days versus median 15 days, range 12–18). On the other hand the peripheral blood CD 34+ peak did not differ significantly between the three groups (median 129/μl with 6 mg pegfilgrastim, range 30–433, median 78/μl with 12 mg pegfilgrastim, range 20– 1055 and median 111/μl with filgrastim, range 28–760, p=0.95). With a median of 1.0x10E7 CD34+ cells per kg (range 5.8x10E6-1.9x10E7) in the “6 mg pegfilgrastim group”, 7.4x10E6 CD34+ cells per kg (median, range 4.9x10E6- 3.8x10E7) in the “12 mg pegfilgrastim group” and 10.8x10E6 CD34+ cells per kg (median, range 5.0x10E6-8.7x10E7) in the “filgrastim group” there were no significant differences in the total number of harvested CD34+ cells. Following high-dose therapy with melphalan (200 mg/m2) and autografting leukocyte and platelet reconstitution was similar within all groups. In summary, a single dose of pegfilgrastim after high dose cyclophosphamide is capable of mobilizing a sufficient number of CD 34+ cells for succesful autografting and sustained hematological reconstitution in patients with multiple myeloma. No difference could be observed between 6 mg and 12 mg of pegfilgrastim. Our data provide the basis for randomized studies evaluating the optimal dose and timing of pegfilgrastim as well as long-term outcome in larger cohorts of patients.

A Comparison of Chemotherapy + G-CSF Versus Plerixafor (Mozobil®) + G-CSF for Stem Cell Mobilization In Patients with Multiple Myeloma Treated with Lenalidomide

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 2258-2258
Author(s):  
Tomer M Mark ◽  
Adriana C Rossi ◽  
Roger N Pearse ◽  
Morton Coleman ◽  
David Bernstein ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cells ◽  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Cell Yield ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Cd34 Cells ◽  
Stem Cell Collection

Abstract Abstract 2258 Background: Prior use of lenalidomide beyond 6 cycles of therapy in the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM) has been shown to negatively impact stem cell yield, but this phenomenon can be overcome with the addition of high-dose cyclophosphamide to standard G-CSF mobilization. We hypothesized that the use of plerixafor (Mozobil®) would compare similarly to chemotherapy in rescuing the ability to collect stem cells in lenalidomide-treated myeloma. Methods: We performed a retrospective study comparing the efficacy of plerixafor + G-CSF mobilization (PG) to chemotherapy + G-CSF (CG) (either high-dose cyclophosphamide at 3g/m2 or DCEP [4-day infusional dexamethasone/ cyclophosphamide/ etoposide/cisplatin]) in 49 consecutive stem cell collection attempts in patients with MM exposed to prior lenalidomide. The primary endpoint was the ability to collect sufficient stem cells for at least two transplants (minimum 5×106 CD34+ cells/kg), comparing results in terms of total exposure to lenalidomide and time elapsed from lenalidomide exposure until the mobilization attempt. The secondary endpoint was number of apheresis days required to meet collection goal. Resilts: Twenty-four patients underwent PG mobilization and twenty-five with CG (21 with G-CSF + cyclophosphamide, 4 with G-CSF+DCEP). The two groups did not differ in terms of total amount of lenalidomide exposure: median number of lenalidomide cycles for patients mobilized with PG was 6.5 (range 1.2–86.6), vs. 6 (range 2–21.6), for patients mobilized with CG (P = 0.663). The median time between mobilization and last lenalidomide dose was also similar between the two groups: 57.5 (range 12–462) days for PG vs. 154 (range 27–805) days for CG (P = 0.101). There was an equivalent rate of successful collection of 100% for PG and 96% for CG, P = 0.322. One patient failed collection in the CG group due to emergent hospitalization for septic shock during a period of neutropenia; no patient collected with PG had a serious adverse event that interrupted the collection process. Stem cell yield did not differ between the two arms (13.9 vs. 18.8 × 106 million CD34+ cells/kg for PG vs. CG respectively, P = 0.083). Average time to collection goal was also equal, with a median of time of 1 day required in both groups, (range 1–2 days for PG, 1–5 days for CG, P = 0.073). There was no relationship between amount of lenalidomide exposure and stem cell yield with either PG (P = 0.243) or CG (P = 0.867). Conclusion: A plerixafor + G-CSF mobilization schedule is equivalent in efficacy to chemotherapy + G-CSF in obtaining adequate numbers of stem cells for two autologous stem cell transplants in patients with MM exposed to lenalidomide; however, PG may be a less toxic approach than chemomobilization. Number of lenalidomide cycles has no impact on chances of stem cell collection success using either method. Disclosures: Mark: Celgene Corp: Speakers Bureau; Millenium Corp: Speakers Bureau. Zafar: Celgene Corp: Speakers Bureau. Niesvizky: Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Millenium: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Onyx: Consultancy, Research Funding.

Bortezomib Plus Dexamethasone As Induction Treatment Followed by Autologous Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients with Multiple Myeloma: A Study From India

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 4584-4584 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shyam Aggarwal ◽  
Anshul Bhalla ◽  
S.L Khatri ◽  
Anand Simar S ◽  
Manorama Bhargava ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Peripheral Blood ◽  
Progressive Disease ◽  
Peripheral Blood Stem Cell ◽  
Blood Stem Cell ◽  
Induction Regimen ◽  
Stem Cell Collection ◽  
Blood Stem Cell Transplantation

Abstract Abstract 4584 Background and Objectives – Multiple myeloma (MM) is an incurable hematological malignancy, afflicting 25000 patients each year in India. Complete remission in myeloma is a surrogate marker for improved survival. The objective of induction regimen, using novel agents such a bortezomib, and Autologous Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation (APBSCT) is to increase the number of patients achieving CR. Here, we report a retrospective evaluation of the efficacy and response rates of induction with Bortezomib (Velcade) plus Dexamethasone (VD Regimen) followed by APBSCT and its effect on stem cell collection and final outcome of the transplant. Methods – Ten patients with symptomatic MM who had received VD induction before stem cell collection were evaluated. VD Induction comprised of Bortezomib (1.3 mg/m2) and Dexamethasone (40 mg) administered on days 1, 4, 8, 11 for four 21-day cycles. Peripheral blood stem cell collection technique involved administration of granulocyte stimulating factor (G-CSF); 300 mg/kg administered twice daily for 5 days. Adequate number of stem cells was collected in nine patients by a single harvest. One patient required apharesis twice for adequate stem cell collection. These cells were cryo-preserved. High dose Melphalan (200 mg/m2) was given followed by stem cell transfusion. Results – The median CD34-positive stem cell count was 5.6 × 106/kg. All the patients engrafted post transplant. The median time for engraftment i.e. Absolute Neutrophil Count (ANC) > 500/mL was 10 days and Platelet Count > 50000/mL was 16 days. The median length of hospital stay was 21 days. They were successfully managed for fever and infections with antibiotics, antifungals and supportive treatment. Irradiated blood (median - 4 units) and platelet apharesis (median – 3 units) were given. Response was assessed according to International Myeloma Working Group uniform response criteria. After induction with VD protocol, the overall response rate (ORR) was 90%. 2 patients (20%) had a complete response (CR), 7 patients (70%) had very good partial response (VGPR) and 1 patient (10%) had progressive disease. Post – APBSCT, the patient with progressive disease achieved VGPR and 6 out of 7 patients (85.7%) with VGPR achieved CR making the total responses as 8 CRs and 2 VGPRs. Thus, ORR was 100%, including 80% CR rate and 20% VGPR rate. All patients were put on maintenance therapy, 6 patients were on thalidomide (50 mg/day) and 4 patients received lenalidomide (10 mg/day) therapy. In the analysis, the median progression-free survival (PFS) was not reached at 22 months. The median overall survival (OS) was not reached after a median follow-up of 25 months, and the 2-year OS rate was 70%. Three patients (30%) had a relapse post-APBSCT, after 5 months, 9 months and 18 months respectively. Two patients (20%) expired, one due to myeloma and the other due to unrelated cause. All three patients with renal insufficiency experienced improvement in renal function and did not require dialysis post-APBSCT. Two patients (20%) developed neuropathy and two patients (20%) developed Herpes Zoster infection due to bortezomib therapy. Conclusions – The induction regimen of bortezomib plus dexamethasone is effective and well tolerated in symptomatic myeloma patients. It significantly improves post-induction and post-transplantation CR and VGPR rates and does not affect stem cell mobilization and collection procedure. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document