scholarly journals Preliminary Results from a Phase II Study of the Combination of Azacitidine and Pembrolizumab in Patients with Higher-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 464-464 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kelly S. Chien ◽  
Jorge E. Cortes ◽  
Gautam Borthakur ◽  
Courtney D. DiNardo ◽  
Naval G. Daver ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Myelodysplastic Syndrome ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
International Prognostic Scoring System ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Genetics Research ◽  
Ongoing Phase

Abstract Background: The survival of patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) after hypomethylating agent (HMA) failure is poor at about 4 to 6 months. The exposure of CD34 positive cells from patients with MDS to HMA has been shown to result in increased expression of PD-1 and PD-L1, with a sequential increase in the expression of PD-1 and PD-L1 particularly in patients that have failed HMA (Yang H, Leukemia 2014). Pembrolizumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody targeting PD-1, thus blocking its interaction with ligands PD-L1 and PD-L2, that has been FDA-approved for certain solid tumors. Consequently, we designed an ongoing phase II clinical trial to evaluate the safety and clinical activity of the combination of azacitidine and pembrolizumab in patients with higher-risk MDS. Methods: Adult patients with intermediate-1 or higher disease by the International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) were eligible for the study. Patients were divided into two cohorts: those who had not received prior therapy and those who had not responded to, progressed on, or relapsed after HMA therapy, with a goal enrollment of 20 patients per cohort. Patients received azacitidine 75 mg/m2 IV or SQ daily for 7 days on a 28-day cycle and pembrolizumab 200 mg IV starting on cycle 1 day 1 and every 3 weeks thereafter independent of azacitidine dosing schedule. The endpoints were overall response rate and safety. Patients were discontinued from the clinical trial if there was disease progression, unacceptable adverse experiences, intercurrent illness preventing further administration of study treatment, confirmed positive serum pregnancy test, noncompliance, loss to follow-up, completion of 24 months of uninterrupted treatment with pembrolizumab or 35 administrations of the study medication (whichever occurred later), lack of efficacy, or any other reason leading to the investigator's decision for withdrawal. Clinical trial information: NCT03094637. Results: At data cut-off (July 2018), 18 patients have been treated with azacitidine and pembrolizumab with a median follow-up time of 16 weeks and 9 patients continuing on treatment in cycles 1-6. Twelve patients were enrolled in the HMA failure cohort and 6 patients in the previously untreated MDS cohort. Of the 12 patients evaluable for response, 7 were in the HMA failure cohort and 5 in the previously untreated MDS cohort. In the HMA failure cohort, 1 patient achieved CR, 1 patient demonstrated hematological improvement with mCR or CRi, and 5 patients progressed. In the previously untreated MDS cohort, 1 patient attained CR, 2 patients exhibited hematological improvement, 1 patient showed progression, and 1 patient died due to treatment-unrelated causes. The most frequently observed mutations in the 5 responding patients were TET2 in 3 patients and ASXL1, DNMT3A, and RUNX1 in 2 patients each. Three of the responders had diploid cytogenetics, 1 had del(10), and 1 had complex karyotype. Treatment was overall well-tolerated. Most common treatment-related adverse events (all grades) were neutropenia (22%); elevated ALT, elevated AST, anemia, and injection site reactions (17%); and constipation, joint pain, anorexia, pneumonitis, and pneumonia (11%). Conclusions: In this ongoing phase II trial, preliminary data suggest that azacitidine and pembrolizumab was relatively safe and may have antitumor activity in patients who failed HMA. Disclosures Cortes: Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Research Funding; Astellas Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Arog: Research Funding. DiNardo:Karyopharm: Honoraria; Medimmune: Honoraria; Agios: Consultancy; Bayer: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Abbvie: Honoraria. Daver:Sunesis: Research Funding; ARIAD: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Karyopharm: Research Funding; Incyte: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Sunesis: Consultancy; Otsuka: Consultancy; Kiromic: Research Funding; Daiichi-Sankyo: Research Funding; Karyopharm: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Incyte: Research Funding; Alexion: Consultancy; Novartis: Research Funding; ImmunoGen: Consultancy; Pfizer: Research Funding. Jain:Adaptive Biotechnologioes: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Astra Zeneca: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Astra Zeneca: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Cellectis: Research Funding; Servier: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Servier: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Abbvie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Infinity: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novimmune: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Research Funding; Cellectis: Research Funding; Astra Zeneca: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; ADC Therapeutics: Research Funding; Verastem: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novimmune: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Verastem: Research Funding; ADC Therapeutics: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Servier: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Servier: Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Research Funding; ADC Therapeutics: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astra Zeneca: Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Verastem: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Infinity: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; ADC Therapeutics: Research Funding; Verastem: Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Adaptive Biotechnologioes: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

scholarly journals A Randomized Phase II, Open Label, Study of Daratumumab, Weekly Low-Dose Oral Dexamethasone and Cyclophosphamide with or without Pomalidomide in Patients with Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 3121-3121 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Sebag ◽  
Nizar Bahlis ◽  
Christopher P. Venner ◽  
Arleigh McCurdy ◽  
C. Tom Kouroukis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Randomized Phase Ii ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Line Of Therapy

Introduction As lenalidomide (Len) has become an integral part of therapy for newly diagnosed MM patients, most will have been either exposed or refractory to Len at the time of first or second relapse. The monoclonal antibody, Daratumumab, in combination with the more potent IMID pomalidomide (Pom) demonstrates good responses in patients previously exposed to lenalidomide. Low dose weekly cyclophosphamide has been shown to enhance the potency of pomalidomide in association with dexamethasone. In this clinical trial, we set out to compare the combination of daratumumab, weekly low dose cyclophosphamide, dexamethasone and pomalidomide (DCdP) to daratumumab, cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone (DCd) with pomalidomide added only at disease progression. Although we expected that a four-drug regiment would give superior clinical results, we hypothesized that a significant number of patients would not necessarily need all four drugs but could benefit from the addition of pomalidomide at treatment failure. Patients/Methods In this phase II clinical trial 120 patients with relapsed refractory myeloma, after at least one line of therapy, were randomized to receive either daratumumab (16mg/kg) weekly IV C1-2, every 2 weeks C3-6, monthly C7+, dexamethasone 40mg po weekly, cyclophosphamide 400mg po weekly and pomalidomide 4mg po days 1-21 of 28 day cycles (Arm A) or the same doses and dosing regimen of daratumumab, cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone but with pomalidomide added only after confirmed disease progression (Arm B). All patients had to be exposed to proteasome inhibitors and len prior to study entry. The primary endpoint of this study is the comparison of the PFS of Arm A and the PFS of Arm B after the addition Pom (PFS2) at 36 months while secondary endpoints included overall responses, duration of responses, survival and safety. Correlative laboratory studies are also planned. Results As of 1 April 2019 all 120 patients have been enrolled in 11 sites across Canada. The patient characteristics were: median age 65 (range 39-82); median 2 prior lines of therapy (range 1-8); 70% had a previous ASCT; 95% lenalidomide exposed; 93% proteasome inhibitor exposed; 90% lenalidomide and PI exposed; 25% carfilzomib exposed, len was the last line of therapy in 65%. Median follow-up was 8.2 months (range 1-15.6), median number of cycles 8 (range 1-17). The overall response rates (ORR) were 88.5% for arm A compared with 50.8% for arm B, with 57.4% and 25.4% of patients achieving ≥VGPR in arm A and B respectively. Among the 20 patients in Arm B that had progressed by data cutoff, the ORR after adding pomalidomide was 40% albeit with the short follow up time of 3.4 months. Although the median PFS of Arm A has not yet been reached, it was 10.9 mo. in Arm B prior to the addition of pom and 14.3 mo. from trial entry in the smaller group in whom pom was added after first progression (PFS2). In Arm A the 9- month PFS was 83%. Rates of grade 3/4 hematologic toxicities included a high incidence of neutropenia, 74% in Arm A and 30% in Arm B; however the rates of febrile neutropenia were low at 8.2% and 6.8% respectively. Grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia were 4.9% and 13.6%, respectively. The most common non-hematologic toxicity was pneumonia in 18% and 16.9% in arms A and B, respectively. Conclusions The results of this randomized phase II trial demonstrate that in a moderately pretreated MM population (median 2 lines of therapy but range 1-8) that the four-drug combination (DCdP) confers impressive response rates (ORR 88.5%) and a 9-month PFS of 83%. Although the three-drug combination (DCd) showed an inferior response rate of 50%, this is superior to Daratumumab used as a single agent in a similar patient population and so far at least 40% of patients who have progressed appear salvageable showing responses upon addition of Pom. Moreover, the addition of low dose cyclophosphamide, an alkylator with recognized immune properties, appears to enhance ORR and produce a durable PFS even when compared to Dara-pom-dex combinations used after two lines of therapy. Toxicities were principally hematologic and few resulted in treatment discontinuations. Disclosures Sebag: Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Bahlis:Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria. Venner:Celgene: Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria. McCurdy:Celgene: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria. Shustik:Takeda: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. White:Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria. Kotb:Karyopharm: Equity Ownership; Amgen: Honoraria; Merck: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria. Stakiw:Roche: Research Funding; Lundbeck: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Sanofi: Honoraria. Laferriere:Celgene: Honoraria; Taiho: Honoraria; Teva Pharm: Honoraria; ROCHE: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Astra Zeneca: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria. Camacho:Abbvie: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Baush-Health: Consultancy. Reece:Otsuka: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Karyopharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding.

Long Term Follow up of a Phase 2 Study of Ruxolitinib in Patients with Splanchnic Vein Thrombosis Associated with Myeloproliferative Neoplasm

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 2803-2803 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lisa Pieri ◽  
Chiara Paoli ◽  
Umberto Arena ◽  
Fabio Marra ◽  
Fabio Mori ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Platelet Count ◽  
Weight Gain ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Esophageal Varices ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Splanchnic Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Vein Thrombosis

Abstract Background: Philadelphia-negative Myeloproliferative Neoplasms (MPN) include Polycythemia Vera (PV), Essential Thrombocythemia (ET) and Myelofibrosis, both Primary (PMF) and secondary to PV or ET (PPV-MF and PET-MF). A MPN is frequently the underlying cause of splanchnic vein thrombosis (SVT). Ruxolitinib, a JAK1/2 inhibitor, efficiently reduced spleen volume and improved symptoms in patients (pts) with MF and PV in the COMFORT-I/II and RESPONSE phase III trials, and in ET pts in a phase II study. We reported (Blood 2014 124:3192) that ruxolitinib was safe in pts with MPN associated to SVT and effective in reducing spleen size at the planned primary endpoint analysis at 24 weeks (w) in a phase II clinical trial. Herein we present follow up data with cut off at 1 year after core period (a total of 72 w of treatment). Methods: Main enrolment criteria included diagnosis of PV, ET, PMF or PPV-/PET-MF associated with SVT, splenomegaly >5 cm below costal margin (bcm), active anticoagulant or antiaggregant thrombosis prophylaxis, platelet count (plt) >100 x109/L, neutrophils count >1x109/L, normal hepatic and renal function, absence of esophageal varices >grade 2. Pts who completed the 24 w of study treatment and tolerated well the drug and had evidence of clinically-significant improvement were allowed to enter an extension phase aimed at collecting and reviewing safety and efficacy data. The drug was provided free of charge by Novartis, that had no role in trial design nor in data analysis. Results: Diagnosis of MPN were: PMF 8 (38.1%), PV 5 (23.8%), ET 4 (19.1%), PPV-MF 3 (14.3%), PET-MF 1 (4.8%). Nineteen pts had spleno-porto-mesenteric thrombosis and 3 Budd-Chiari syndrome (BCS); one pt had both sites involved. Initial dose of ruxolitinib was 10 mg BID for PV, 25 mg BID for ET, 15 mg BID for MF pts with baseline (bl) platelet count of 100 to 200x109/L and 20 mg BID for platelet count >200x109/L. Currently 17/21 pts are on active treatment, 14 completed w72; final data for all 17 pts will be available at meeting. One pt with MF discontinued from the study being shifted to commercial ruxolitinib at w60, one ET and one MF pt discontinued for inefficacy at w24 and one MF pt for an unrelated adverse event after w72. Efficacy: 13/21 (61.9%) pts obtained a ≥50% spleen length (sl) reduction by palpation at w24, that was maintained at w72 in 8/14 pts (57.1%). Median sl reduction at w72 was 63% (range 0-100). No significant differences in resistive or pulsatility index of splanchnic artery were noted, nor in esophageal varices status evaluated at w72. 10/11 evaluated pts with echocardiography at w72 showed a median reduction of the cardiac output of 20.1% (range 2.3-42.2) mainly due to a reduction of heart rate and of cardiac index (-21.9%, range 8.8-44.3) due to increase in body surface area. The first effect could be attributed to decrease of proinflammatory cytokines, the second to weight gain associated with ruxolitinib. Symptomatology was evaluated by MPN-SAF up to w24, showing a median total symptom score reduction from 65 to 42. Safety: regardless of drug relationship, the most common adverse events (AE) (% any grade, % grade ≥3) were thrombocythopenia (57.1%; 14.3%) and anemia (33.3%, 19%) that were the main reasons for dose adjustments. Other AE included AST or ALT increase (42.9%, 0%), diarrhea (28.6%, 0%), abdominal pain (23.8%, 0%), ascites (19%, 0%), fever (23.8%, 0%), neutropenia, (9.5%, 9.5%), upper airways infection (19%, 0%), weight gain (14.3%, 4.8%), muscle cramps (14.3%, 0%). Three serious AE occurred: one case of hepatocarcinoma in a pts with BCS, one grade 2 pneumonia and one grade 2 haematemesis not related to esophageal varices. Median ruxolitinib total daily dose at w72, after dose adjustments, was 19.1 mg for MF, 16 mg for PV and 28.3 mg for ET. Median hemoglobin reduced from 12.9 gr/dL (range 9.4-16.7) at bl to 10.7 (8.4-14.4) at w16 and recovered at w72 (12.1, range 10.8-14.7). No pts received transfusions. Median platelet count was 212 x109/L (100-389) at bl, reached to the lowest level at w4 (139, range 48-252) and improved to 160 (69-285) at w72. Median leukocyte count decreased from 7.3 x109/L (1.8-16.4) at bl to 4.08 (1.2-21.7) at w 24, and remained substantially stable through w 72 (4.96; range 2.45-17.3). Median reduction of JAK2 allele burden at w72 was 9% (range 0-38). Conclusions: At w 72 follow up, ruxolitinib continues to be safe in pts with MPN associated to SVT and maintains efficacy against splenomegaly in 57% of the pts. Disclosures De Stefano: Roche: Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Speakers Bureau; Bruno Farmaceutici: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Janssen Cilag: Research Funding; Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Shire: Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Speakers Bureau. Barbui:Novartis: Speakers Bureau. Vannucchi:Novartis: Other: Research Funding paid to institution (University of Florence), Research Funding; Shire: Speakers Bureau; Baxalta: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau.

Updated Outcomes of Fludarabine/Melphalan/Bortezomib (Flu/Mel/Vel) Conditioning for Upfront Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation in Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 5885-5885
Author(s):  
Taiga Nishihori ◽  
Claudio Anasetti ◽  
Rachid Baz ◽  
Jose L Ochoa-Bayona ◽  
Kenneth H. Shain ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Allogeneic Hct ◽  
Genetics Research ◽  
Gvhd Prophylaxis ◽  
Unrelated Donors

Abstract Background: Multiple myeloma remains incurable despite impressive array of available novel agents and therapeutic strategies. Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) remains the only potentially curative option for patients with multiple myeloma but it is limited by its toxicities. We previously reported initial result of a phase 2 study of upfront allogeneic HCT in myeloma patients achieving at least very good partial response (VGPR) after initial therapy (Nishihori, et al. ASH 2013 abstract 3390) and here we report more mature results after a median follow up of 3 years. Methods: Twenty seven myeloma patients received allogeneic HCT between 01/2010 and 02/2015 at Moffitt Cancer Center (NCT 00948922). Eligible patients were age ≤ 60, achieving first ≥ VGPR or complete response (CR), and have 8/8 HLA-matched related or unrelated donors. Conditioning regimen consisted of fludarabine 30 mg/m2 for 4 days (days -6, -5, -4, and -3) and melphalan 70 mg/m2 for 2 days (days -4 and -3) followed by a single dose of bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2 on day -3 (Flu/Mel/Vel regimen). GVHD prophylaxis was initially left to the discretion of physicians but later modified to only tacrolimus/methotrexate. No maintenance therapy was prescribed after allogeneic HCT. Results: The median age at transplant was 50 (range, 25-58) years. Disease status at the time of allogeneic HCT was VGPR (n=17: 63%) and CR/stringent CR (n=10: 37%). All patients received unmanipulated peripheral blood stem cell grafts from HLA-matched related donors (n=14) or HLA-matched unrelated donors (n=13). Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis was tacrolimus plus either methotrexate (n=19: 70%), or mycophenolate mofetil (n=4), or sirolimus (n=4). All patients achieved neutrophil engraftment with a median of 15 (range, 11-19) days. Platelet engraftment was achieved with a median of 17 (range, 13 - 35) days and 2 patients did not recover platelets. The cumulative incidences of grades II-IV and grades III-IV acute GVHD at day 100 were 63.6% (95% confidence interval (CI): 43.1-81.1) and 19.6% (95%CI: 5.4-39.9), respectively. The cumulative incidence of moderate to severe chronic GVHD was 56.4% (95%CI: 36.3-75.5) at 1-year. The cumulative incidences of transplant-related mortality at day 100, 1 year and 2 years were 7.4% (95%CI: 0.8-20.0), 11.1% (95%CI: 2.7-25.4), and 11.1% (95%CI: 2.7-25.4), respectively. Progression-free survival estimates at 1, 2, and 3 years were 74.1% (95%CI: 53.2-86.7), 65.1% (95%CI: 43.3-80.2), and 65.1% (95%CI: 49.9-87.5), respectively. With a median follow up of 39 months for surviving patients, overall survival estimates at 1, 2 and 3 years were 85% (95%CI: 64.9-94.1), 75.4% (95%CI: 52.6-88.3), and 69.1% (95%CI: 53.8-93.5), respectively. Conclusions: The results of the this phase 2 trial of upfront allogeneic HCT with fludarabine/melphalan/bortezomib (Flu/Mel/Vel) conditioning are promising and provide the rationale for reasonable potentially curative option to younger and fit patients who are eligible for upfront intensive consolidation strategy. This approach may be potentially valuable for those with high-risk myeloma and a multicenter study is currently being conducted (BMT CTN protocol 1302:NCT02440464). Disclosures Nishihori: Novartis: Research Funding; Signal Genetics: Research Funding. Baz:Takeda/Millennium: Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Karyopharm: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Signal Genetics: Research Funding. Shain:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Amgen/Onyx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Signal Genetics: Research Funding; Takeda/Millennium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Speakers Bureau. Alsina:Signal Genetics: Consultancy; Novartis: Research Funding; Takeda/Millennium: Research Funding; Amgen/Onyx: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau.

scholarly journals Real-World Outcomes for Pediatric and Young Adult Patients with Relapsed or Refractory (R/R) B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL) Treated with Tisagenlecleucel: Update from the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR) Registry

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 428-428
Author(s):  
Samuel John ◽  
Michael A. Pulsipher ◽  
Amy Moskop ◽  
Zhen-Huan Hu ◽  
Christine L. Phillips ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
T Cell ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Real World ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Ad Hoc ◽  
Age Groups ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Advisory Boards

Abstract Background: Tisagenlecleucel is an autologous CD19-directed T-cell immunotherapy indicated in the USA for treatment of patients up to 25 years (y) of age with B-cell ALL that is refractory or in second or later relapse. Overall response rate was 82% with 24 months' (mo) follow-up in the registrational ELIANA trial [Grupp et al. Blood 2018]; pooled data from ELIANA and ENSIGN revealed similar outcomes upon stratification by age (<18y and ≥18y) [Rives et al. HemaSphere 2018]. Early real-world data for tisagenlecleucel from the CIBMTR registry reported similar efficacy to ELIANA with no new safety signals [Pasquini et al. Blood Adv 2020]. Outcomes are reported here for patients who received tisagenlecleucel in the real-world setting, stratified by age (<18y and ≥18y). Methods: This noninterventional prospective study used data from the CIBMTR registry and included patients aged ≤25y with R/R ALL. Eligible patients received commercial tisagenlecleucel after August 30, 2017, in the USA or Canada. Age-specific analyses were conducted in patients aged <18y and ≥18y at the time of infusion. Efficacy was assessed in patients with ≥12mo follow-up at each reporting center and included best overall response (BOR) of complete remission (CR), duration of response (DOR), event-free survival (EFS), relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS). Safety was evaluated in all patients who completed the first (100-day) assessment. Adverse events (AEs) of interest - including cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and neurotoxicity - were monitored throughout the reporting period. CRS and neurotoxicity were graded using the ASTCT criteria. Results: As of October 30, 2020, data from 451 patients were collected, all of whom received tisagenlecleucel. The median time from receipt of leukapheresis product at the manufacturing site to shipment was 27 days (interquartile range: 25-34). Patients aged ≥18y appeared to have greater disease burden at baseline than those aged <18y, indicated by lower rates of morphologic CR and minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity prior to infusion. Older patients were also more heavily pre-treated before infusion. All other patient characteristics at baseline were comparable between the two groups (Table 1). In the efficacy set (median follow-up 21.5mo; range 11.9-37.2; N=322), BOR of CR was 87.3% (95% CI 83.1-90.7); MRD status was available for 150 patients, of whom 98.7% were MRD negative. Median DOR was 23.9mo (95% CI 12.3-not estimable [NE]), median EFS was 14.0mo (9.8-24.8) and median RFS was 23.9mo (13.0-NE); 12mo EFS and RFS were 54.3% and 62.3%, respectively. For OS, the median was not reached. Efficacy outcomes were generally similar across age groups (Table 1). In the safety set (median follow-up 20.0mo; range 2.6-37.2; N=400), most AEs of interest occurred within 100 days of infusion. Any-grade CRS was observed in 58.0% of patients; Grade ≥3 in 17.8%. Treatment for CRS included tocilizumab (n=113; 28.3% of all patients) and corticosteroids (n=31; 7.8%). Neurotoxicity was observed in 27.3% of patients; Grade ≥3 in 10.0%. Treatment for neurotoxicity included tocilizumab (n=17; 4.3% of all patients) and corticosteroids (n=28; 7.0%). During the reporting period, 82 (20.5%) patients died; the most common cause of death was recurrence/persistence/progression of primary disease. CRS and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell-related encephalopathy syndrome were the primary cause of death in 2 patients and 1 patient, respectively. Overall, safety data were similar across age groups, although more patients aged ≥18y experienced any-grade CRS or neurotoxicity and were subsequently treated (Table 1). Conclusions: Updated registry data for pediatric and young adult patients with R/R ALL treated with tisagenlecleucel revealed that patients aged ≥18y had a greater disease burden and were more heavily pre-treated at baseline than patients aged <18y. The overall efficacy and safety profiles of commercial tisagenlecleucel reflected those observed in the clinical trial setting [Grupp et al. Blood 2018; Rives et al. HemaSphere 2018] and were broadly consistent across age groups. Some important differences between the <18y and ≥18y groups were identified, which may point to challenges in timely identification and/or referral of older patients for CAR-T cell therapy. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Pulsipher: Equillium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Adaptive: Research Funding; Jasper Therapeutics: Honoraria. Hu: Kite/Gilead: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding. Phillips: Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Margossian: Cue Biopharma, Inc.: Current Employment; Novartis: Other: Ad hoc Advisory Boards. Nikiforow: Kite/Gilead: Other: Ad hoc advisory boards; Novartis: Other: Ad hoc advisory boards; Iovance: Other: Ad hoc advisory boards; GlaxoSmithKline (GSK): Other: Ad hoc advisory boards. Martin: Novartis: Other: Local PI for clinical trial; Bluebird Bio: Other: Local PI for clinical trial. Rouce: Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Tessa Therapeutics: Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy. Tiwari: Novartis Healthcare private limited: Current Employment. Redondo: Novartis: Current Employment. Willert: Novartis: Current Employment. Agarwal: Novartis Pharmaceutical Corporation: Current Employment, Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company. Pasquini: Kite Pharma: Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding. Grupp: Novartis, Roche, GSK, Humanigen, CBMG, Eureka, and Janssen/JnJ: Consultancy; Novartis, Kite, Vertex, and Servier: Research Funding; Novartis, Adaptimmune, TCR2, Cellectis, Juno, Vertex, Allogene and Cabaletta: Other: Study steering committees or scientific advisory boards; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Other: Steering committee, Research Funding.

scholarly journals Cladribine Combined with Idarubicin and High-Dose AraC (CLIA2) As a Frontline and Salvage Treatment for Young Patients (≤65 yrs) with Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 4039-4039 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mansour Alfayez ◽  
Hagop M. Kantarjian ◽  
Farhad Ravandi ◽  
Guillermo Garcia-Manero ◽  
Marina Y. Konopleva ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Young Patients ◽  
Multiparameter Flow Cytometry ◽  
Intrathecal Therapy ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Genetics Research ◽  
Equity Ownership

Abstract Background Nucleoside analogues such as cladribine can increase the efficacy of cytarabine (araC) by modulating deoxycytidine kinase. The addition of cladribine to standard 7+3 chemotherapy has been shown to improve survival in pts with AML (Holowiecki JCO 2012). Results of our part-1 phase-2 clinical trial (cladribine combined with intermediate dose araC and idarubicin (CLIA1)) reported promising results that exceeded pretreatment expectations for response and tolerability (Jain, et. al. ASH 2016). Based on that, and the benefit of higher doses of cytarabine in younger patients (UK-MRC AML, Willemze JCO 2014), we investigated a higher dose of araC in combination with cladribine and idarubicin (CLIA2). Methods Non-APL, non-core binding factor AML pts 18-65 yrs of age with adequate organ function were enrolled in 1 of 3 cohorts: de novo AML, secondary AML (s-AML), or relapsed/refractory AML (R/R). Induction was cladribine 5 mg/m2 IV over 30 minutes on days 1-5, followed by araC 2g/m2 IV on days 1-5, and idarubicin 10 mg/m2 IV days 1-3. Consolidation consisted of up to 5 more cycles of CLIA2 for 3 days instead of 5. Dose-adjustments were allowed for age and PS. Sorafenib or midostaurin was added for pts with FLT3 mutations which occurred in 35% of pts on this study. Prophylactic intrathecal therapy was offered to higher risk pts at count nadir during cycle 1. Mutation profiling was performed using next generation sequencing prior to starting therapy. Results 65 patients were enrolled, with a median age of 47 yrs (range, 24-65): 37 pts (57%) in the frontline, 12 (19%) pts in the s-AML, and 16 (25%) in the R/R cohorts. Pt characteristics and outcomes by cohort are outlined in Table 1. The most commonly detected mutations at baseline were TET2 (45%), DNMT3a (37%), FLT3 (35%), ASXL1 (28%), and NPM1 (28%). Of 35 evaluable pts in the frontline cohort, 31 responded (ORR=89%) with 27 CR (77%) and 4 CRi (11%). Among the responders, 61% were negative for minimal residual disease (MRD [-]) by multiparameter flow cytometry. In the s-AML cohort, 10 pts were evaluable with an ORR of 60% (6/10) with 5 CR (50%) and 1 CRp (10%); 4 (67%) were MRD [-]. In the R/R cohort, 14 pts, previously treated with a median of 1 (1-4) prior therapy were evaluable for response. There were 7 CR (50%), 1 CRi (7%), for ORR of 57%; and 63% were MRD [-]. The median OS was not reached in the frontline and s-AML cohorts with median follow up of 5.2 and 11.5, months, respectively. In the R/R cohort, the median follow up was 4.7 months and median OS was 6.7 months [Figure.1]. Relapse-free survival was not reached in frontline and salvage cohort, and was 9.1 months in s-AML with median follow up of 5.2, 3.9, and 3.5 months in frontline, s-AML, and salvage cohorts, respectively [Figure.2]. The regimen was well tolerated. The most common ≥ grade 3 possibly-related non-hematologic adverse events were fever/infection (38), bleeding (2), and abnormal liver function test (3). Conclusion The 3-drug combination with a higher dose of araC, CLIA2, is safe and effective in younger pts with AML. Compared to our prior experience in pts with s-AML, using higher dose of cytarabine in CLIA2 for this cohort seems to have the highest impact. This trend however was also seen in the salvage and frontline cohorts when compared to the results from CLIA1. Response rates for pts in the newly-diagnosed AML, s-AML, and in the salvage settings are promising and should be explored further in larger studies and compared to current standard regimens. Disclosures Ravandi: Jazz: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Astellas Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sunesis: Honoraria; Sunesis: Honoraria; Macrogenix: Honoraria, Research Funding; Orsenix: Honoraria; Jazz: Honoraria; Xencor: Research Funding; Astellas Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria; Xencor: Research Funding; Macrogenix: Honoraria, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Orsenix: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding. Konopleva:Stemline Therapeutics: Research Funding. Daver:Otsuka: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Incyte: Research Funding; Kiromic: Research Funding; Daiichi-Sankyo: Research Funding; Incyte: Consultancy; Novartis: Research Funding; ImmunoGen: Consultancy; Alexion: Consultancy; Sunesis: Consultancy; Pfizer: Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy; Karyopharm: Consultancy; Sunesis: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; ARIAD: Research Funding; Karyopharm: Research Funding. DiNardo:Bayer: Honoraria; Karyopharm: Honoraria; Abbvie: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Medimmune: Honoraria; Agios: Consultancy. Bose:Constellation Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Incyte Corporation: Honoraria, Research Funding; Astellas Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Blueprint Medicines Corporation: Research Funding; Celgene Corporation: Honoraria, Research Funding; CTI BioPharma: Research Funding; Pfizer, Inc.: Research Funding. Andreeff:SentiBio: Equity Ownership; Jazz Pharma: Consultancy; Oncoceutics: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Eutropics: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Astra Zeneca: Research Funding; Oncolyze: Equity Ownership; Celgene: Consultancy; Aptose: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Reata: Equity Ownership; Daiichi-Sankyo: Consultancy, Patents & Royalties: MDM2 inhibitor activity patent, Research Funding; United Therapeutics: Patents & Royalties: GD2 inhibition in breast cancer . Pemmaraju:abbvie: Research Funding; cellectis: Research Funding; samus: Research Funding; SagerStrong Foundation: Research Funding; stemline: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; novartis: Research Funding; plexxikon: Research Funding; daiichi sankyo: Research Funding; Affymetrix: Research Funding; celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria. Jabbour:novartis: Research Funding. Cortes:novartis: Research Funding. Kadia:Abbvie: Consultancy; BMS: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy; Celgene: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Jazz: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy; BMS: Research Funding; Jazz: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding.

scholarly journals A Randomized Phase II Study of Azacitidine Combined with Lenalidomide or with Vorinostat Vs. Azacitidine Monotherapy in Higher-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) and Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia (CMML): North American Intergroup Study SWOG S1117

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. LBA-5-LBA-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mikkael A. Sekeres ◽  
Megan Othus ◽  
Alan F. List ◽  
Olatoyosi Odenike ◽  
Richard M. Stone ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Combination Therapy ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
International Prognostic Scoring System ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
N Rates

Abstract Background: Higher-risk MDS and CMML comprise a spectrum of disorders associated with cytopenias, high risk of transformation to acute myeloid leukemia (AML), and truncated survival. Initial treatment with a hypomethylating agent such as azacitidine (AZA) is considered standard of care. Whether addition of the histone deacetylase inhibitor vorinostat (VOR), which acts synergistically with AZA to reactivate epigenetically silenced genes, or addition of lenalidomide (LEN), which impacts the bone marrow microenvironment, improves response rates compared to AZA monotherapy is unknown. Methods: This Phase II study (ClinTrials.gov # NCT01522976) randomized higher-risk MDS (International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) Int-2 or High and/or bone marrow blasts >5%) and CMML patients (pts) with <20% blasts to receive AZA (75 mg/m2/d on d1-7 of a 28d cycle), AZA + LEN (10 mg/d on d1-21), or AZA + VOR (300 mg BID on d3-9). Eligibility criteria included: >18 years (yrs), no previous allogeneic transplant, no prior treatment with any of the study drugs, and adequate organ function; therapy-related (t)MDS was allowed. Pts continued treatment until disease progression, relapse, unacceptable toxicity, or lack of response. Dose reductions occurred for unresolved grade >3 adverse events (per NCI CTCAE) or delayed count recovery. The primary endpoint was improvement in overall response rate (ORR), by intention to treat and reviewed centrally, of one of the combination arms vs. AZA monotherapy per 2006 International Working Group MDS response criteria (complete response (CR) + partial response (PR) + hematologic improvement (HI)). Relapse-free survival (RFS) was from time of response. The study had 81% power to detect a 20% improvement in ORR from 35% to 55%. Results: Of 282 pts enrolled from 3/12–6/14, 276 are included in analyses (6 ineligible pts excluded): 92 on the AZA arm, 93 on AZA+LEN, and 91 on AZA+VOR. Baseline characteristics were well-balanced across arms (Table). Pts received a median of 23 weeks of therapy: 25 of AZA; 24 of AZA+LEN; and 20 of AZA+VOR and were followed for a median of 9 months (range: 0-26). Numbers of pts with notable adverse events >grade 3 for AZA:AZA+LEN:AZA+VOR included febrile neutropenia (10:13:13); gastrointestinal disorders (4:11:23); infections (2:3:3); and rash (2:12:1). Responses were assessable in 260 pts (94%). ORR for the entire cohort was 33%: 19% CR, 1% PR, and 13% HI, with a median RFS of 7 months. ORR was similar across study arms: 36% for AZA, 37% for AZA+LEN (p=1.0 vs. AZA), and 22% for AZA+VOR (p=.07 vs. AZA). CR/PR/HI rates across arms were also similar: 23%/0%/13% for AZA; 18%/1%/17% for AZA+LEN (CR p=.47 vs. AZA); and 14%/1%/7% for AZA+VOR (CR p=.18 vs. AZA); rates of bone marrow exams to assess response were 76%, 67%, and 73%, respectively. HI-P/HI-E/HI-N rates were 21%/15%/5% for AZA, 26%/14%/15% for AZA+LEN, and 12%/8%/4% for AZA+VOR. HI-N rates were higher in AZA+LEN vs. AZA (p=.05) but otherwise were similar across arms. Median time to best response across arms was 15 weeks in AZA, 16 weeks in AZA+LEN, and 16 weeks in AZA+VOR. ORR did not vary significantly across arms in subgroup analyses for tMDS, baseline red blood cell (RBC) transfusion dependence, and by IPSS risk group. ORR for CMML pts for AZA:AZA+LEN:AZA+VOR was 33%:53%(p=.15 vs. AZA):12%(p=.41 vs. AZA). Allogeneic transplantation rates were: 7 pts on AZA, 6 on AZA+LEN, and 9 on AZA+VOR. For AZA:AZA+LEN:AZA+VOR, median RFS was: 6:8:11 months (log-rank p=.3 for combination arms vs. AZA, Figure); and for pts on therapy >6 months, it was 7:7.5:13 months (log-rank p=.11 for AZA+VOR, .74 for AZA+LEN vs. AZA). Conclusions: In higher-risk MDS pts, ORR was similar for AZA monotherapy compared to AZA-containing combination arms, though some subgroups may have benefitted from combination therapy. Differences in types of response may have resulted from differential rates of follow-up bone marrow assessments. While a non-significant signal of a DFS advantage for combination therapy was observed, longer-term outcome data are being assessed. Table Table. Figure Figure. Disclosures Sekeres: Boehringer-Ingelheim: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Off Label Use: lenalidomide, vorinostat for higher-risk MDS. List:Celgene Corporation: Consultancy. Gore:Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding. Attar:Celgene: Consultancy. Erba:Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Takeda Pharmaceuticals International Co.: Research Funding; Astellas Pharma: Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau.

scholarly journals Phase 2 Study of Nilotinib 400 Mg Twice Daily in Newly Diagnosed Patients with Accelerated Phase of Chronic Myeloid Leukemia, Results after 5.7 Years of Follow-up

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 3011-3011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lucia Masarova ◽  
Jorge E. Cortes ◽  
Keyur P. Patel ◽  
Susan M. O'Brien ◽  
Graciela M. Nogueras González ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Genetics Research ◽  
Phase 2 Study ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract OBJECTIVES Nilotinib is a potent, second generation inhibitor of BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase (TKI) and represent a standard of care for patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), including accelerated phase (AP-CML). In 2005, we initiated a phase 2 study of nilotinib 400 mg twice daily as a frontline therapy in patients with AP-CML, and herein present the efficacy and safety data after a median follow-up of 68.4 months (range, 0.3-124.8). METHODS This was a prospective, single institution, phase 2 study in patients of age ≥18 years with a newly diagnosed, untreated AP-CML (except for <1 month of previous imatinib) defined according to MD Anderson criteria (Kantarjian, 1988). Patients were treated with nilotinib 400 mg twice daily (BID). Data are presented on an intention to treat analysis with a cutoff date of June 30st, 2018. Response criteria are standard. Fisher exact test and χ2 were used for analysis of categorical variables; and survival probabilities were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Time to events (e.g., overall survival, event free survival) was calculated from the date of treatment to the date of an event or to last follow-up as previously reported (Cortes et al, 2010). RESULTS Twenty two patients of a median age of 53.7 years (range, 26-79.7) were enrolled. Table 1 summarizes clinical characteristics of all patients. The median treatment duration was 47.3 months (range; 0.3-124.4), and the median follow-up 68.4 months (range, 0.3-124.8). All patients discontinued study as of January 2017 due to planned study closure; but 11 patients (50%) continued on nilotinib off protocol at data cut-off (400 mg BID [3]; 300 mg BID [2]; and 200 mg BID [6]). Median time to treatment discontinuation in the remaining 11 patients was 12.9 months (range, 0.3-112); reason for discontinuation was: inadequate response [3], toxicity [2], non-compliance/financial [4]; elective discontinuation after sustained MR4.5 >2 years [1]; and death due to stroke [1]. Sixteen patients (73%) achieved complete hematologic response (CHR). Overall rates of CCyR, MMR, MR4.5 and CMR (undetectable transcripts with at least 100,000 ABL copies) were 73%, 73%, 55%, and 41%, respectively. Median times to CCyR, MMR, and MR4.5 were 2.9 months (range, 2.7-6.4), 5.7 months (range, 2.7-99.2) and 6.0 months (range, 2.7-36), respectively. Seven patients (32%) achieved sustained MR4.5 >2 years. In total, 4 patients lost their best achieved response (CHR [1], CCyR [2] and MR4.5 [1]) while on study. All events were associated with acquired ABL domain mutation; Y253H [2], T315I [1], and F359I [1] with a median time to detection of 16.7 months (range, 7-40). During the study conduct, one patient progressed to blast phase after 2 months on nilotinib. Two patients died while on study, one due to stroke and one due to unrelated medical condition, after being on therapy for 3 and 0.4 months, respectively. One patient electively discontinued nilotinib after being in sustained MR4.5 for 107 months, and remains in MR4.5 after 6 months off therapy. Estimated overall survival and event free survival at 5 years were 84% and 70%, respectively (Figures 1a & 1b). On univariate analysis, age >55 years was associated with lower rate of MMR (p = 0.034; HR 0.34; 95% CI 0.12-0.92); MR4 (p = 0.013; HR 0.25; 95% CI 0.08-0.75); and MR4.5 (p = 0.01; HR 0.15; 95% CI 0.04-0.63). Overall survival was inferior in patients older than 55 years (p = 0.014; HR 2.4; 95% CI 2.36-not estimated); and in those with > 1 AP-CML defining abnormality (p = 0.018; HR 9.53; 95% CI 0.98-92). The most frequent non-hematologic adverse events (AEs) were hyperbilirubinemia (63% of patients), rash (63%), hypertension (59%), and transaminitis (50%). Grade ≥3 AEs observed in more than one patient were hyperbilirubinemia (n=2), and transaminitis (=2). Two patients developed arterio-thrombotic AEs: stroke and myocardial infarction (one each). Hematologic AEs included (all grades; grade ≥3): anemia (36%; 9%), thrombocytopenia (32%; 14%) and neutropenia (14%; 9%). Two patients (9%) discontinued therapy due to nilotinib related AE, one for G3 peripheral neuropathy and one for G3 hyperbilirubinemia with G2 thrombocytopenia. CONCLUSION Nilotinib is safe and highly effective in patients with AP-CML, and induces fast and durable responses. More than 50% of patients can achieve MR4.5. Clinical trial.gov: NCT00129740. Disclosures Cortes: novartis: Research Funding. O'Brien:Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy; Aptose Biosciences Inc.: Consultancy; Kite Pharma: Research Funding; Regeneron: Research Funding; Vaniam Group LLC: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy; Alexion: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy; Acerta: Research Funding; Gilead: Consultancy, Research Funding; Sunesis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Astellas: Consultancy; TG Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding. Konopleva:Stemline Therapeutics: Research Funding; Immunogen: Research Funding; abbvie: Research Funding; cellectis: Research Funding. Verstovsek:Incyte: Consultancy; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Italfarmaco: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Kadia:Celgene: Research Funding; Jazz: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy; BMS: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Celgene: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Jazz: Consultancy, Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding. Ravandi:Macrogenix: Honoraria, Research Funding; Orsenix: Honoraria; Orsenix: Honoraria; Astellas Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria; Xencor: Research Funding; Sunesis: Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Astellas Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria; Jazz: Honoraria; Abbvie: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Macrogenix: Honoraria, Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Jazz: Honoraria; Sunesis: Honoraria; Xencor: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding.

Real World Evidence of Prescription Patterns and Effect of Oxbryta (voxelotor) for Patients with Sickle Cell Disease

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 31-32
Author(s):  
Nirmish Shah ◽  
Ahmar Urooj Zaidi ◽  
Michael U. Callaghan ◽  
Darla Liles ◽  
Clarissa E. Johnson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Sickle Cell ◽  
Real World ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Cell Disease ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Real World Evidence ◽  
Disease Modifying

Background: Sickle cell disease (SCD) is a chronic illness characterized by anemia, recurrent severe pain and recurrent organ damage, affecting approximately 100,000 persons in the United States. Prior to November 2019, FDA approved SCD disease-modifying treatments included only hydroxyurea (HU) and L-glutamine. However, voxelotor (Oxbryta®) was recently approved under an accelerated approval based on the HOPE study for the treatment of adult and pediatric patients with SCD 12 years of age and older. We aimed to provide real world evidence of the types of patients prescribed voxelotor and preliminary evidence of potential treatment effects. Methods: Patient records were reviewed from five medical centers with comprehensive sickle cell care. All patients prescribed voxelotor from Nov 25, 2019 to July 31, 2020 were included in our analysis. Data reviewed included: patient demographics, hydroxyurea use, as well as pre- and post- voxelotor changes on red cell transfusion number, vaso-occlusive crisis (VOC) and hemoglobin (Hb) values. In addition, voxelotor dosage changes, side effects, and patients perception on impact on their health were recorded. Descriptive and summary statistics were used to provide results. Results: We reviewed data from 60 patients (18 pediatric and 42 adult), across the five centers, who were prescribed voxelotor. Mean age was 33 (SD 13.8) years old with 63% female patients. All patients were African-American/Black and 96% were HbSS (2% Hb SC and 2% HbSOArab). Eighty (80)% were on hydroxyurea, 20% were on chronic transfusions, and 10% were on erythropoietin stimulating agents when prescribed voxelotor. Mean baseline hemoglobin during the 3 months prior to initiation was 7.38 g/dL (SD 1.46) with all patients started at the recommended dose of 1500mg. Annualized VOC events for the year prior to starting voxelotor was 0.62 (SD) or 7.44 VOCs per year. Across all sites, 31 patients were prescribed voxelotor but had either not initiated drug, not returned for follow up labs at time of analysis, or refused to take drug once approved (n=1). Nine patients had only 1 month of follow labs to review and an additional 18 patients with 3 months of follow up labs. These 27 patients were followed for an average of 6.0 months (SD 7.7) on treatment with 4 patients (15%) requiring dose adjustment to 1000mg. Dose adjustments were for side effects including abdominal pain, diarrhea, loose stools and nausea/vomiting. One patient had dosing changed from daily to three times a day. Average hemoglobin during steady state after 1 and 3 months of treatment were 8.6 g/dL (SD 1.8) and 8.0 g/dL (SD 1.8), respectively. In addition, 52% increased by 1g/dL at 1 month (n=21) and 44% increased by 1g/dL at 3 months (n=18). The mean maximum hemoglobin obtained during the 3-month period following initiation of voxelotor was 8.9 (SD 2.1) g/dL. During follow up visits, several patients reported 'more energy' and improvement in 'morning achiness' and 'quality of life', while a few patients noted no change in stamina or well-being. Three patients (5%) had drug discontinued due to becoming pregnant, unexplained elevation of liver enzymes, and due to excessive abdominal pain and nausea. Annualized VOC rates after voxelotor initiation were numerically decreased, although limited by short follow up. Conclusion: We present real world evidence of prescribing patterns and initial outcomes from the use of newly approved voxelotor. We found the majority of patients prescribed voxelotor were the HbSS genotype, on hydroxyurea, and with a mean baseline Hb &lt;7.5 g/dL, indicating an initial focus on more anemic patients. Interestingly, one-fifth of the prescribed patients where on chronic transfusions. Consistent with the HOPE trial, the average Hb levels was found to have increased at 1 month and 3-month follow up. Our preliminary results support an overall increase in hemoglobin in patients treated with voxelotor and we aim to continue following patients over a longer follow up period. This provides important real-world evidence for this newly approved disease-modifying therapy for SCD. Disclosures Shah: Alexion: Speakers Bureau; CSL Behring: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Global Blood Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bluebird Bio: Consultancy. Zaidi:Global Blood Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Emmaus Life Sciences: Consultancy, Honoraria; Imara: Consultancy, Honoraria; bluebird bio: Consultancy, Honoraria; Cyclerion: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria. Callaghan:Grifols: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Octapharma: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche/Genentech: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Site Investigator/sub-I Clinical Trial, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Site Investigator/sub-I Clinical Trial, Research Funding; Sancillio: Other; Bayer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; NovoNordisk: Other, Speakers Bureau; Biomarin: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Site Investigator/sub-I Clinical Trial, Speakers Bureau; Global Blood Therapeutics: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other, Speakers Bureau; Alnylum: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Bioverativ: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Spark: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Shire: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Hema Biologics: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. De Castro:Global Blood Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; FORMA Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GlycoMimetics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Employing Factor IX Variants to Avoid Limitations Imposed by Immune Recognition of AAV Vector in Hemophilia B Gene Therapy

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 3124-3124 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul E. Monahan ◽  
Junjiang Sun ◽  
Tong Gui ◽  
David G Wichlan ◽  
Scott W McPhee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Gene Therapy ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Specific Activity ◽  
Factor Ix ◽  
Hemophilia B ◽  
Ongoing Clinical Trial ◽  
Advisory Committees

Abstract Abstract 3124 Persistent factor IX expression and phenotypic improvement have been achieved in a human clinical trial for hemophilia B using liver-directed adeno-associated virus (AAV) gene therapy vectors. An ongoing clinical trial uses a vector incorporating self-complementing AAV (scAAV) genome form, factor IX codon optimization (FIXopt) and AAV serotype 8 capsid. As was seen in a previous single-strand AAV serotype 2 trial, dose escalation has been associated with apparent immune-mediated transient inflammation of vector-transduced liver, although in contrast to the previous trial persistent FIX expression has been maintained for the first time. Taken together, these important trials define a consistent threshold load of AAV capsid that has stimulated capsid-specific cytotoxic lymphocyte recognition and potential transaminitis. To advance the successes achieved in these trials while providing a clear margin of safety so that this immunogenic threshold need not be approached, we have pursued steps to limit further the AAV capsid load. Single amino acid substitutions at arginine 338 in the FIX catalytic domain generate FIX variants with increased specific activity. We separately substituted either R338A, R338Q, or R338L (FIX Padua) into a codon optimized human factor IX cDNA and evaluated F.IX expression in tissue culture following plasmid DNA transfection of HEK 293t cells. Each R338 substitution improved FIX specific activity, up to 10 times increased over wild type using the R338LFIXopt cDNA. We next generated scAAV8 vectors incorporating a liver-specific transthyretin (TTR) promoter to express optimized codon F.IX cDNA with or without the R338L substitution. FIX−/− mice receiving portal vein injection of 1 × 1010 vg/animal (4 ×1011 vg/kg) expressed 86.5% of normal FIX activity at 2 months post-transduction from the WTopt vector and 330% normal from the R338LFIXopt. Incorporation of R338Lopt variant resulted in at least 6 to 10 fold increase in FIX specific activity over a follow-up of > 40 weeks. At ten months following FIX gene delivery, mice underwent a tail transection bleeding challenge. FIX vector mice demonstrated therapeutic protection from this major bleeding challenge and furthermore all survived with no late rebleeding (a hallmark of hemophilic phenotype). Greater than 100% normal human FIX activity was maintained for >40 weeks following treatment with the R338LFIX vector (v. 26.3% at euthanasia in WTopt vector group). The prolonged follow-up permitted extended safety evaluation. Factor IX inhibitor antibodies were not detected in any mice throughout the follow-up; FIX-binding IgG1 and IgG2 were negative also. Thrombin/antithrombin III complexes (TAT) examined at 12 weeks and at >30 weeks of age in R338LFIXopt vector mice did not differ from levels in WTFIXopt vector-treated or age-matched C57Bl/6 hemostatically normal mice. Necropsy at 40–44 weeks after vector (1 year of age) showed only age-related changes with no microvascular or macrovascular thrombosis on H&E staining or specific immunostaining for fibrin/fibrinogen deposition; specific staining for fibrosis within myocardium or other sites was negative. We next synthesized a R338LFIXopt expression cassette containing the LP1 promoter/enhancer/intron sequence being used in the ongoing clinical trial and demonstrated equivalent FIX activity from either promoter construct. We then established that the R338LFIXopt vector gives a predictable dose-response across a range of doses as low as 1x 1010 vg/kg I.V. and as high as 4 × 1012 vg/kg I.V. Hemarthrosis is the most common bleeding complication in hemophilia and leads to chronic joint destruction. Bleeding was induced in the joint of FIX−/− mice that had been transduced 4 weeks earlier with the R338LFIX vector. Joints were collected at 2 weeks after induced bleed and the bleeding-induced joint damage was graded using an established histologic score. I.V. R338LFIXopt vector pretreatment resulted in protection against joint degeneration in a dose-dependent fashion in this most relevant clinical scenario. These preclinical studies demonstrate a safety :efficacy profile to advance hemophilia gene therapy using the scAAV8.R338LFIXopt vector. Disclosures: Monahan: Baxter: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bayer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Asklepios BioPharmaceutical: Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; CSL Behring: Honoraria; NovoNordisk: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; PharmaIN: Research Funding; Prolor-Biotech: Research Funding. McPhee:Asklepios Biopharmaceutical: Employment. Samulski:Asklepios Biopharmaceutical: Employment, Patents & Royalties.

scholarly journals Association between Quality of Response and Outcome in Patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Treated with Ibrutinib

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1873-1873
Author(s):  
Paolo Strati ◽  
Mariela Sivina ◽  
Ekaterina Kim ◽  
Michael J. Keating ◽  
William G. Wierda ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Median Time ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Treatment Initiation ◽  
Treatment Discontinuation ◽  
Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Genetics Research ◽  
Baseline Characteristics

Abstract Introduction. In the context of chemoimmunotherapy, complete remission (CR) is more common and is associated with improved survival in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). CR is less frequent in CLL patients treated with ibrutinib, and the prognostic significance of achieving CR with ibrutinib is indeterminate. Methods. We prospectively analyzed 208 CLL patients treated on a phase 2 study (NCT02007044) of first-line (deletion 17p only; n=27) or salvage ibrutinib (n=181), with or without rituximab, between 12/2013 and 01/2018. Response was assessed by international workshop on CLL 2018 guidelines. Categorical variables were compared using the χ2 or Fisher exact tests. Progression-free survival (PFS) was defined as time from treatment initiation to disease progression and/or death, and Kaplan-Meier curves compared using the log-rank test. A landmark analysis at median time of CR achievement (best response) was performed for PFS. Results. After a median follow-up of 34 months (range, 3-48 months), response was evaluable in 194 patients, overall response rate (ORR) was 99%, and CR rate was 24%, with negative minimal residual disease (MRD) in 3% of patients; median time to response was 10 months (range, 3-45 months) and median time to CR was 21 months (5-45 months). None of the patients' baseline characteristics associated with achievement of CR (Table). Among the 47 patients in CR, 7 (15%) discontinued treatment, after a median time from treatment initiation of 19 months (range, 10-39); the main cause of discontinuation was toxicity (5 patients), with second cancer (metastatic melanoma) and disease progression prompting treatment discontinuation only in 2 patients. Among the 145 patients in PR, 50 (34%) discontinued treatment, after a median time from treatment initiation of 14 months (range, 4-45 months); while the main cause of discontinuation was again toxicity (26 patients), 2nd cancers and progressive disease prompted treatment discontinuation in 5 and 14 patients, respectively. Remaining causes of treatment discontinuation among patients in PR were loss to follow-up (3 patients) and consolidation therapy (2 patients). Median PFS was not reached and 28 patients (13%) progressed and/or died. Achievement of CR significantly associated with prolonged PFS (4-year PFS 98% vs 78%, p=0.03)(Figure). The association between CR and prolonged PFS was also confirmed on a landmark analysis (21 months)(p=0.05). Among baseline characteristics shown in the Table, the only factor associated with prolonged PFS was absence of complex karyotype (4-year PFS 80% vs 40%, p=0.05). Median OS has not been reached and 16 (8%) patients have died; of these, only 1 patient was in CR (and cause of death was metastatic melanoma), whereas the remaining 15 were in PR. Among patients in PR, causes of death were: infections in 7 patients, 2nd cancers in 2 patients, Richter transformation in 2 patients and other in 4 patients (small bowel obstruction, colon perforation, intracranial hemorrhage, bradyarrhythmia). Conclusions. This is the first study showing that achievement of CR is a desirable endpoint for patients with CLL treated with ibrutinib, associating with prolonged PFS. Our results support the development of future combination studies, aimed at achieving higher rates of CR in patients treated with ibrutinib. Figure. Figure. Disclosures Wierda: AbbVie, Inc: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding. Jain:Infinity: Research Funding; Novimmune: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genentech: Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Research Funding; Infinity: Research Funding; ADC Therapeutics: Research Funding; Astra Zeneca: Research Funding; Cellectis: Research Funding; Verastem: Research Funding; Servier: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Research Funding; ADC Therapeutics: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; ADC Therapeutics: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Servier: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Adaptive Biotechnologioes: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astra Zeneca: Research Funding; Abbvie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astra Zeneca: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Servier: Research Funding; Verastem: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Verastem: Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; ADC Therapeutics: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Cellectis: Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Adaptive Biotechnologioes: Research Funding; Servier: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pharmacyclics: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novimmune: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astra Zeneca: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Verastem: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Thompson:Adaptive Biotechnologies: Research Funding; Genentech: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie: Honoraria, Research Funding; Gilead Sciences: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pharmacyclics: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document