scholarly journals Initial Results from a Phase 1 Clinical Study of bb21217, a Next-Generation Anti Bcma CAR T Therapy

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 488-488 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nina Shah ◽  
Melissa Alsina ◽  
David S Siegel ◽  
Sundar Jagannath ◽  
Deepu Madduri ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cells ◽  
T Cell ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Car T Cells ◽  
Car T Cell ◽  
Car T ◽  
Equity Ownership

Abstract Introduction: Immunomodulatory chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy directed against B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) has shown promising results for the treatment of relapsed refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) in several phase 1 clinical studies in patients with advanced disease. Persistence of CAR T cells post infusion may be one determinant of duration of response. bb21217 is a next-generation anti-BCMA CAR T cell therapy based on investigational therapy bb2121 (Friedman 2018, Hum Gene Ther 29:585). It uses the same scFv, 4-1BB costimulatory motif and CD3-zeta T cell activation domain as bb2121 with the addition of phosphoinositide 3 kinase inhibitor bb007 during ex vivo culture to enrich the drug product for T cells displaying a memory-like phenotype. Evidence suggests that CAR T cells with this phenotype may be more persistent and more potent than unselected CAR T cells. CRB-402 is a first-in-human clinical study of bb21217 in patients with RRMM designed to assess the safety, pharmacokinetics, efficacy and duration of effect of bb21217. Methods: CRB-402 (NCT03274219) is an ongoing, multi-center phase 1 dose escalation trial of bb21217 in approximately 50 patients with RRMM who have received ≥ 3 prior regimens, including a proteasome inhibitor and an immuno-modulatory agent, or are double-refractory. During dose escalation, enrollment is restricted to patients with ≥ 50% BCMA expression by IHC on malignant plasma cells. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells are collected via leukapheresis and sent to a central facility for transduction, expansion and release testing prior to being returned to the site for infusion. Patients undergo lymphodepletion with fludarabine (30 mg/m2) and cyclophosphamide (300 mg/m2) daily for 3 days, then receive bb21217 as a single infusion. Planned dose levels are 150, 450, 800, and 1,200 x 106 CAR+ T cells. The primary outcome measure is incidence of adverse events (AEs), including dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs). Additional outcome measures are quality and duration of clinical response assessed according to the IMWG Uniform Response Criteria for MM, evaluation of minimal residual disease (MRD), progression-free and overall survival, and quantification of CAR+ cells in blood. Results: Asof June 15, 2018, 8 patients (median age 64 [min;max 54 to 70]) have received bb21217. All patients to date received a dose of 150 x 106 CAR+ T cells. Four had high tumor burden, defined as ≥ 50% bone marrow plasma cells pre-infusion. Patients had a median of 9 (min;max 4 to 17) prior lines of therapy and 7/8 had prior autologous stem cell transplant; 50% had high-risk cytogenetics. Four of 8 (50%) had previously received Bort/Len/Car/Pom/Dara. Median follow-up after bb21217 infusion was 16 weeks (2 to 27 weeks) and 7 patients were evaluable for initial (1-month) clinical response. As of data cut-off, 5 of 8 patients developed cytokine release syndrome (CRS; 1 Grade 1, 3 Grade 2, 1 Grade 3) and responded to supportive care or tocilizumab. This included 1 patient with high tumor burden who experienced DLTs consisting of grade 3 CRS and grade 4 encephalopathy with signs of posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome on MRI. This patient received tocilizumab, corticosteroids and cyclophosphamide, improved neurologically and achieved a sCR. Following this event, the dose escalation cohort was divided into two groups based on tumor burden and dosing continued at 150x106 CAR+ T cells. No deaths occurred. With 1 to 6 months since treatment, 6 of 7 patients had demonstrated clinical response per IMWG criteria: currently 1 sCR, 3 VGPR, 2 PR. MRD negative results at 10-5 nucleated cells were obtained by next-generation sequencing in 3 of 3 evaluable responders. Robust CAR+ T cell expansion during the first 30 days was observed in 7 of 7 evaluable patients. Two of 2 patients evaluable at 6 months had detectable CAR vector copies. Conclusions: Early efficacy results with bb21217 CAR T therapy in RRMM at a dose of 150 x 106 CAR+ T cells are encouraging, with 6 of 7 patients demonstrating clinical responses. The adverse events observed to date are consistent with known toxicities of CAR T therapies. CAR+ T cells were measurable at 6 months post treatment in both evaluable patients. Enrollment in the study is ongoing; longer follow-up and data in more patients will establish whether treatment with bb21217 results in sustained CAR+ T cell persistence and responses. Disclosures Shah: Kite: Consultancy; Indapta Therapeutics: Consultancy; University of California San Francisco: Employment; Nekktar: Consultancy; Teneobio: Consultancy; Sanofi: Consultancy; Janssen: Research Funding; Indapta Therapeutics: Equity Ownership; Amgen: Consultancy; Bluebird: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Sutro Biopharma: Research Funding; Nkarta: Consultancy. Siegel:Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Merck: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Jagannath:Multiple Myeloma Research Foundation: Speakers Bureau; Merck: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Medicom: Speakers Bureau. Kaufman:Karyopharm: Other: data monitoring committee; BMS: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy. Turka:bluebird bio, Inc: Employment, Equity Ownership. Lam:bluebird bio, Inc: Employment, Equity Ownership. Massaro:bluebird bio, Inc: Employment, Equity Ownership. Hege:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties: multiple; Mersana: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; SITC: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Arcus Biosicences: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Petrocca:bluebird bio, Inc: Employment, Equity Ownership. Berdeja:Glenmark: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Bluebird: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Poseida Therapeutics, Inc.: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Teva: Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding. Raje:AstraZeneca: Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy; Merck: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Amgen Inc.: Consultancy; Research to Practice: Honoraria; Medscape: Honoraria.

scholarly journals Development and Evaluation of a Human Single Chain Variable Fragment (scFv) Derived Bcma Targeted CAR T Cell Vector Leads to a High Objective Response Rate in Patients with Advanced MM

Blood ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 130 (Suppl_1) ◽  
pp. 742-742 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric L Smith ◽  
Sham Mailankody ◽  
Arnab Ghosh ◽  
Reed Masakayan ◽  
Mette Staehr ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cells ◽  
T Cell ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Car T Cells ◽  
Car T Cell ◽  
Car T ◽  
Equity Ownership

Abstract Patients with relapsed/refractory MM (RRMM) rarely obtain durable remissions with available therapies. Clinical use of BCMA targeted CAR T cell therapy was first reported in 12/2015 for RRMM, and based on small numbers, preliminary results appear promising. Given that host immune anti-murine CAR responses have limited the efficacy of repeat dosing (Turtle C. Sci Trans Med 2016), our goal was to develop a human BCMA targeted CAR T cell vector for clinical translation. We screened a human B cell derived scFv phage display library containing 6x1010 scFvs with BCMA expressing NIH 3T3 cells, and validated results on human MM cell lines. 57 unique and diverse BCMA specific scFvs were identified containing light and heavy chain CDR's each covering 6 subfamilies, with HCDR3 length ranges from 5-18 amino acids. 17 scFvs met stringent specificity criteria, and a diverse set was cloned into CAR vectors with either a CD28 or a 4-1BB co-stimulatory domain. Donor T cells transduced with BCMA targeted CAR vectors that conveyed particularly desirable properties over multiple in vitro assays, including: cytotoxicity on human MM cell lines at low E:T ratios (>90% lysis, 1:1, 16h), robust proliferation after repeat antigen stimulation (up to 700 fold, stimulation q3-4d for 14d), and active cytokine profiling, were selected for in vivo studies using a marrow predominant human MM cell line model in NSG mice. A single IV injection of CAR T cells, either early (4d) or late (21d) after MM engraftment was evaluated. In both cases survival was increased when treated with BCMA targeted CAR T cells vs CD19 targeted CAR T cells (median OS at 60d NR vs 35d p<0.05). Tumor and CAR T cells were imaged in vivo by taking advantage of luciferase constructs with different substrates. Results show rapid tumor clearance, peak (>10,000 fold) CAR T expansion at day 6, followed by contraction of CAR T cells after MM clearance, confirming the efficacy of the anti-BCMA scFv/4-1BB containing construct. Co-culture with primary cells from a range of normal tissues did not activate CAR T cells as noted by a lack of IFN release. Co-culture of 293 cells expressing this scFv with those expressing a library of other TNFRSF or Ig receptor members demonstrated specific binding to BCMA. GLP toxicity studies in mice showed no unexpected adverse events. We generated a retroviral construct for clinical use including a truncated epithelial growth factor receptor (EGFRt) elimination gene: EGFRt/hBCMA-41BBz. Clinical investigation of this construct is underway in a dose escalation, single institution trial. Enrollment is completed on 2/4 planned dose levels (DL). On DL1 pts received cyclophosphamide conditioning (3g/m2 x1) and 72x106 mean CAR+ T cells. On DL2 pts received lower dose cyclophosphamide/fludarabine (300/30 mg/m2 x3) and 137x106 mean CAR+ T cells. All pts screened for BCMA expression by IHC were eligible. High risk cytogenetics were present in 4/6 pts. Median prior lines of therapy was 7; all pts had IMiD, PI, high dose melphalan, and CD38 directed therapies. With a data cut off of 7/20/17, 6 pts are evaluable for safety. There were no DLT's. At DL1, grade 1 CRS, not requiring intervention, occurred in 1/3 pts. At DL2, grade 1/2 CRS occurred in 2/3 pts; both received IL6R directed Tocilizumab (Toci) with near immediate resolution. In these 2 pts time to onset of fever was a mean 2d, Tmax was 39.4-41.1 C, peak CRP was 25-27mg/dl, peak IL6 level pre and post Toci were 558-632 and 3375-9071 pg/ml, respectively. Additional serum cytokines increased >10 fold from baseline in both pts include: IFNg, GM CSF, Fractalkine, IL5, IL8, and IP10. Increases in ferritin were limited, and there were no cases of hypofibrinogenemia. There were no grade 3-5 CRS and no neurotoxicities or cerebral edema. No pts received steroids or Cetuximab. Median time to count recovery after neutropenia was 10d (range 6-15d). Objective responses by IMWG criteria after a single dose of CAR T cells were observed across both DLs. At DL1, of 3 pts, responses were 1 VGPR, 1 SD, and 1 pt treated with baseline Mspike 0.46, thus not evaluable by IMWG criteria, had >50% reduction in Mspike, and normalization of K/L ratio. At DL2, 2/2 pts had objective responses with 1 PR and 1 VGPR (baseline 95% marrow involvement); 1 pt is too early to evaluate. As we are employing a human CAR, the study was designed to allow for an optional second dose in pts that do not reach CR. We have treated 2 pts with a second dose, and longer follow up data is pending. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Smith: Juno Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Patents & Royalties: BCMA targeted CAR T cells, Research Funding. Almo: Cue Biopharma: Other: Founder, head of SABequity holder; Institute for Protein Innovation: Consultancy; AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD LLP: Consultancy. Wang: Eureka Therapeutics Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Xu: Eureka Therapeutics, Inc: Employment, Equity Ownership. Park: Amgen: Consultancy. Curran: Juno Therapeutics: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy. Dogan: Celgene: Consultancy; Peer Review Institute: Consultancy; Roche Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Liu: Eureka Therpeutics Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Patents & Royalties. Brentjens: Juno Therapeutics: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding.

scholarly journals A Phase 1 Study with Point-of-Care Manufacturing of Dual Targeted, Tandem Anti-CD19, Anti-CD20 Chimeric Antigen Receptor Modified T (CAR-T) Cells for Relapsed, Refractory, Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 4193-4193 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nirav N Shah ◽  
Fenlu Zhu ◽  
Carolyn Taylor ◽  
Dina Schneider ◽  
Winfried Krueger ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cells ◽  
T Cell ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Third Party ◽  
Car T Cells ◽  
Car T Cell ◽  
Car T ◽  
Equity Ownership

Abstract Background: CAR-T cell therapy directed against the CD19 antigen is a breakthrough treatment for patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory (R/R) B-cell NHL. Despite impressive outcomes, not all pts respond and many that respond still relapse. Affordability and accessibility are further considerations that limit current commercial models of CAR-T products. Commercial CAR-T manufacturing is complex, time consuming, and expensive with a supply chain starting at the treating center with apheresis of mononuclear cells, cryopreservation, and shipping to and from a centralized third-party manufacturing site. We addressed these limitations in a Phase 1 clinical trial evaluating a first-in-human bispecific tandem CAR-T cell directed against both CD19 and CD20 (CAR-20.19-T) antigens for pts with R/R B-cell NHL. Through dual targeting we hope to improve response rates and durability of response while limiting antigen escape. We eliminated third party shipping logistics utilizing the CliniMACS Prodigy, a compact tabletop device that allows for automated manufacturing of CAR-T cells within a GMP compliant environment within the hospital. Most materials and reagents used to produce the CAR-T cell product were single-sourced from the device manufacturer. Methods: Phase 1 (NCT03019055), single center, dose escalation + expansion study to demonstrate feasibility and safety of locally manufactured second generation 41BB + CD3z CAR-20.19-T cells via the CliniMACS Prodigy. Feasibility was measured by ability to generate a target CAR-20.19-T cell dose for a minimum of 75% of subjects. Safety was assessed by the presence of dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) through 28 days post-infusion. Dose was escalated in a 3+3 fashion with a starting dose of 2.5 x 10^5 cells/kg, a target DLT rate <33%, and a goal treatment dose of 2.5 x 10^6 cells/kg. Adults with R/R Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma (DLBCL), Follicular Lymphoma (FL), Mantle Cell Lymphoma (MCL) or Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) were eligible. CAR-T production was set for a 14-day manufacturing process. Day 8 in-process testing was performed to ensure quality and suitability of CAR-T cells for a potential fresh infusion. On Day 10, pts eligible for a fresh CAR-T infusion initiated lymphodepletion (LDP) chemotherapy with fludarabine 30 mg/m2 x 3 days and cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2 x 1 day, and cells were administered after harvest on Day 14. Pts ineligible for fresh infusion received cryopreserved product and LDP was delayed accordingly. Results: 6 pts have been enrolled and treated with CAR-20.19-T cells: 3 pts at 2.5 x 10^5 cells/kg and 3 pts at 7.5 x 10^5 cells/kg. Median age was 53 years (48-62). Underlying disease was MCL in 3 pts, DLBCL in 2 pts, and CLL in 1 patient. Baseline data and prior treatments are listed in Table 1. CAR-T production was successful in all runs and all pts received their target dose. Three pts received fresh CAR-T cells and 3 pts received CAR-T cells after cryopreservation. To date there are no DLTs to report. No cases of Grade 3/4 cytokine release syndrome (CRS) or neurotoxicity (NTX) were observed. One patient had Grade 2 CRS and Grade 2 NTX requiring intervention. The other had self-limited Grade 1 CRS and Grade 1 NTX. Median time to development of CRS was Day +11 post-infusion. All pts had neutrophil recovery (ANC>0.5 K/µL) by Day 28. Response at Day 28 (Table 2) is as follows: 2/6 pts achieved a complete response (CR), 2/6 achieved a partial response (PR), and 2/6 had progressive disease (PD). One subject with a PR subsequently progressed at Day 90. The 3 pts who did progress all underwent a repeat biopsy, and all retained either CD19 or CD20 positivity. Pts are currently being enrolled at the target dose (2.5 x 10^6 cells/kg) and updated results will be provided at ASH. Conclusions: Dual targeted anti-CD19 and anti-CD20 CAR-T cells were successfully produced for all pts demonstrating the feasibility of a point-of-care manufacturing process via the CliniMACS Prodigy device. With no DLTs or Grade 3-4 CRS or NTX to report, and 2/6 heavily pre-treated pts remaining in CR at 3 and 9 months respectively our approach represents a feasible and promising alternative to existing CAR-T models and costs. Down-regulation of both target antigens was not identified in any patient following CAR-T infusion, and in-process studies suggest that a shorter manufacturing timeline is appropriate for future trials (10 days). Disclosures Shah: Juno Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria; Lentigen Technology: Research Funding; Oncosec: Equity Ownership; Miltenyi: Other: Travel funding, Research Funding; Geron: Equity Ownership; Exelexis: Equity Ownership. Zhu:Lentigen Technology Inc., A Miltenyi Biotec Company: Research Funding. Schneider:Lentigen Technology Inc., A Miltenyi Biotec Company: Employment. Krueger:Lentigen Technology Inc., A Miltenyi Biotec Company: Employment. Worden:Lentigen Technology Inc., A Miltenyi Biotec Company: Employment. Hamadani:Sanofi Genzyme: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Merck: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy; MedImmune: Consultancy, Research Funding; Cellerant: Consultancy; Celgene Corporation: Consultancy; Takeda: Research Funding; Ostuka: Research Funding; ADC Therapeutics: Research Funding. Johnson:Miltenyi: Research Funding. Dropulic:Lentigen, A Miltenyi Biotec company: Employment. Orentas:Lentigen Technology Inc., A Miltenyi Biotec Company: Other: Prior Employment. Hari:Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria; Kite Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Spectrum: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen Inc.: Research Funding; Sanofi: Honoraria, Research Funding.

scholarly journals Phase 2 Study of the Response and Safety of P-Bcma-101 CAR-T Cells in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory (r/r) Multiple Myeloma (MM) (PRIME)

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 3184-3184 ◽  
Author(s):  
Caitlin L. Costello ◽  
Tara K. Gregory ◽  
Syed Abbas Ali ◽  
Jesus G. Berdeja ◽  
Krina K. Patel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cells ◽  
T Cell ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Car T Cells ◽  
Car T ◽  
Equity Ownership

P-BCMA-101 is a novel chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell product targeting B Cell Maturation Antigen (BCMA). P-BCMA-101 is produced using the piggyBac® (PB) DNA Modification System instead of the viral vector that is used with most CAR-T cells, requiring only plasmid DNA and mRNA. This makes it less costly and produces cells with a high percentage of the favorable T stem cell memory phenotype (TSCM). The higher cargo capacity of PB permits the incorporation of multiple genes in addition to CAR(s), including a safety switch allowing for rapid CAR-T cell elimination with a small molecule drug infusion in patients if desired, and a selection gene allowing for enrichment of CAR+ cells. Rather than using a traditional antibody-based binder, P-BCMA-101 has a Centyrin™ fused to a CD3ζ/4-1BB signaling domain. Centyrins are fully human proteins with high specificity and a large range of binding affinities, but are smaller, more stable and potentially less immunogenic than traditional scFv. Cumulatively, these features are predicted to result in a greater therapeutic index. A Phase 1, 3+3 dose escalation from 0.75 to 15 x 106 P-BCMA-101 CAR-T cells/kg (RP2D 6-15 x 106 cells/kg) was conducted in patients with r/r MM (Blood 2018 132:1012) demonstrating excellent efficacy and safety of P-BCMA-101, including notably low rates and grades of CRS and neurotoxicity (maximum Grade 2 without necessitating ICU admission, safety switch activation or other aggressive measures). These results supported FDA RMAT designation and initiation of a pivotal Phase 2 study. A Phase 2 pivotal portion of this study has recently been designed and initiated (PRIME; NCT03288493) in r/r MM patients who have received at least 3 prior lines of therapy. Their therapy must have contained a proteasome inhibitor, an IMiD, and CD38 targeted therapy with at least 2 of the prior lines in the form of triplet combinations. They must also have undergone ≥2 cycles of each line unless PD was the best response, refractory to the most recent line of therapy, and undergone autologous stem cell transplant or not be a candidate. Patients are required to be >=18 years old, have measurable disease by International Myeloma Working Group criteria (IMWG; Kumar 2016), adequate vital organ function and lack significant autoimmune, CNS and infectious diseases. No pre-specified level of BCMA expression is required, as this has not been demonstrated to correlate with clinical outcomes for P-BCMA-101 and other BCMA-targeted CAR-T products. Interestingly, unlike most CAR-T products patients may receive P-BCMA-101 after prior CAR-T cells or BCMA targeted agents, and may be multiply infused with P-BCMA-101. Patients are apheresed to harvest T cells, P-BCMA-101 is then manufactured and administered to patients as a single intravenous (IV) dose (6-15 x 106 P-BCMA-101 CAR-T cells/kg) after a standard 3-day cyclophosphamide (300 mg/m2/day) / fludarabine (30 mg/m2/day) conditioning regimen. One hundred patients are planned to be treated with P-BCMA-101. Uniquely, given the safety profile demonstrated during Phase 1, no hospital admission is required and patients may be administered P-BCMA-101 in an outpatient setting. The primary endpoints are safety and response rate by IMWG criteria. With a 100-subject sample, the Phase 2 part of the trial will have 90% power to detect a 15-percentage point improvement over a 30% response rate (based on that of the recently approved anti-CD38 antibody daratumumab), using an exact test for a binomial proportion with a 1-sided 0.05 significance level. Multiple biomarkers are being assessed including BCMA and cytokine levels, CAR-T cell kinetics, immunogenicity, T cell receptor diversity, CAR-T cell and patient gene expression (e.g. Nanostring) and others. Overall, the PRIME study is the first pivotal study of the unique P-BCMA-101 CAR-T product, and utilizes a number of novel design features. Studies are being initiated in combination with approved therapeutics and earlier lines of therapy with the intent of conducting Phase 3 trials. Funding by Poseida Therapeutics and the California Institute for Regenerative Medicine (CIRM). Disclosures Costello: Takeda: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Gregory:Poseida: Research Funding; Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Speakers Bureau. Ali:Celgene: Research Funding; Poseida: Research Funding. Berdeja:Amgen Inc, BioClinica, Celgene Corporation, CRISPR Therapeutics, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Janssen Biotech Inc, Karyopharm Therapeutics, Kite Pharma Inc, Prothena, Servier, Takeda Oncology: Consultancy; AbbVie Inc, Amgen Inc, Acetylon Pharmaceuticals Inc, Bluebird Bio, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Celgene Corporation, Constellation Pharma, Curis Inc, Genentech, Glenmark Pharmaceuticals, Janssen Biotech Inc, Kesios Therapeutics, Lilly, Novartis, Poseida: Research Funding; Poseida: Research Funding. Patel:Oncopeptides, Nektar, Precision Biosciences, BMS: Consultancy; Takeda, Celgene, Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Poseida Therapeutics, Cellectis, Abbvie: Research Funding. Shah:University of California, San Francisco: Employment; Genentech, Seattle Genetics, Oncopeptides, Karoypharm, Surface Oncology, Precision biosciences GSK, Nektar, Amgen, Indapta Therapeutics, Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Indapta Therapeutics: Equity Ownership; Celgene, Janssen, Bluebird Bio, Sutro Biopharma: Research Funding; Poseida: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Nkarta: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kite: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Teneobio: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Ostertag:Poseida Therapeutics, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Martin:Poseida Therapeutics, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Ghoddusi:Poseida Therapeutics, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Shedlock:Poseida Therapeutics, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Spear:Poseida Therapeutics, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Orlowski:Poseida Therapeutics, Inc.: Research Funding. Cohen:Poseida Therapeutics, Inc.: Research Funding.

scholarly journals Response to Bcma CAR-T Cells Correlates with Pretreatment Target Antigen Density and Is Improved By Small Molecule Inhibition of Gamma Secretase

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 1856-1856 ◽  
Author(s):  
Damian J. Green ◽  
Margot Pont ◽  
Andrew J. Cowan ◽  
Gabriel O Cole ◽  
Blythe Duke Sather ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cells ◽  
T Cell ◽  
Tumor Cells ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Gamma Secretase ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Car T Cells ◽  
Car T Cell ◽  
Car T ◽  
Equity Ownership

Introduction: The adoptive transfer of B-Cell Maturation Antigen (BCMA) chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells is demonstrating early promise in multiple myeloma [MM], however durable responses remain elusive and most studies report >50% of patients relapsing within 18 months of receiving CAR-T cell therapy. The mechanism of relapse is likely the consequence of multiple factors including the variable distribution of BCMA on tumor cells, allowing cells with low antigen density to escape. Initial target density, receptor downregulation and the emergence of antigen loss variants have all been implicated in relapse following CAR-T cells directed against CD22 and CD19. Reduced or absent BCMA expression may similarly be linked to relapse in MM. We have previously demonstrated that BCMA cleavage by the γ-secretase complex reduces ligand density for CAR-T cell recognition, and that a small molecule γ-secretase inhibitor (GSI) markedly increases surface BCMA levels in a dose-dependent fashion while improving CAR-T cell recognition in preclinical models. Methods and Results: In a phase I first-in-human study (NCT03338972) employing a CAR-T cell construct encoding a fully human BCMA scFv and 4-1BB/CD3z, rapid and deep objective responses at CAR-T cell doses starting at 5 x 107 have been observed. All patients had bone marrow (BM) involvement at baseline (mean 42.5 % CD138+ by IHC) and 14/15 had no detectable disease in the BM 28 days after therapy. One patient with comparatively very low BCMA expression (BCMA antibody binding capacity [ABC; QuantiBRITE] = 269; 16.9% of the malignant plasma cells (PCs) BCMA+ by flow cytometry) was the only subject with persistent tumor cells in the BM 28 days after therapy. Despite complete BM responses in all remaining patients, late relapses have occurred. Differences in the BCMA expression level on tumor cells prior to CAR-T cells between long term responders and those with relapse are evident. Among the 12 subjects with at least 3 months of follow up, those remaining in remission (median 12 months, range 3-16; data cut off 7/15/19) demonstrated a median pre-treatment BCMA ABC of 1761 (range 781-2922, n=5), in contrast patients with relapse (mean of 7.3 months, range 2-12) had a median pre-treatment BCMA ABC of 920 (range 260-1540, n=7). Six patients with a pretreatment mean ABC of 919 (range 260-1540) had BM evaluable for BCMA expression at relapse and the mean ABC decreased to 304 (range 121-519). The percent PCs expressing BCMA decreased from 77.5% (range 13 - 99.8) to 30% (range 10.4-60.4). The impact of gamma secretase inhibition on BCMA expression was assessed on BM cells obtained from a patient relapsing after BCMA CAR-T cells. At relapse a 9.5-fold decrease in ABC from baseline was observed. The cells were cultured for 5 hours in the presence of GSI (JSMD194) at a concentration of 1mM, which is readily achievable by oral administration. A significant increase in BCMA antigen expression was observed (ABC=917). The impact of modulating BCMA expression on tumor cells by concurrently administering an oral GSI with CAR-T cells is being explored in a phase one clinical trial (NCT03502577). In this setting, the GSI has increased BCMA expression when low level residual BCMA was observed following relapse after prior BCMA therapy failure. Two patients have been evaluated for response to an JSMD194 after failing other BCMA targeted agents. One received a prior BCMA CAR-T cell product and after relapse demonstrated a BCMA ABC of 769. Target expression increased in this patient almost nine-fold to 6828 (ABC) after three oral doses of JSMD194. A second patient had a BCMA ABC of 666 after failing a BCMA bispecific T cell engager. BCMA density increased over 14-fold to 9583 after GSI. Comprehensive data from the combination GSI and BCMA CAR-T cell trial are being reported separately. Conclusion: Pretreatment BCMA target density quantified with a uniform flow cytometry method of measurement and performed on all patients enrolled on a single center BCMA CAR-T cell clinical trial is associated with the durability of response. Further, BCMA expression can be significantly increased following GSI exposure in patients evidencing low BCMA ABC at baseline or when downregulation is the consequence of prior BCMA targeting therapy. The capacity for GSIs to increase BCMA target density and decrease soluble BCMA levels is a promising approach to be exploited in clinical trials. Disclosures Green: Juno Therapeutics: Consultancy, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy; GSK: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Cellectar: Research Funding. Pont:Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center: Other: Inventor on a patent. Cowan:Sanofi: Consultancy; Juno: Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Cellectar: Consultancy. Sather:Lyell Immunopharma: Employment, Equity Ownership. Blake:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Works:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Maloney:Juno Therapeutics: Honoraria, Patents & Royalties: patients pending , Research Funding; A2 Biotherapeutics: Honoraria, Other: Stock options ; BioLine RX, Gilead,Genentech,Novartis: Honoraria; Celgene,Kite Pharma: Honoraria, Research Funding. Riddell:Juno Therapeutics: Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Consultancy; Lyell Immunopharma: Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding. OffLabel Disclosure: Oral Gamma Secretase Inhibitor. Purpose is to increase expression of B Cell Maturation Antigen

scholarly journals Transcend NHL 001: Immunotherapy with the CD19-Directed CAR T-Cell Product JCAR017 Results in High Complete Response Rates in Relapsed or Refractory B-Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 4192-4192 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeremy S. Abramson ◽  
Lia Palomba ◽  
Leo I Gordon ◽  
Matthew Lunning ◽  
Jon Arnason ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cells ◽  
T Cell ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Car T Cells ◽  
Car T Cell ◽  
Non Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
Car T ◽  
Equity Ownership

Abstract Background: Based on promising results seen in patients treated with CD19-directed CAR-T cells in relapsed or refractory (R/R) pediatric B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Gardner, ASCO 2016) and adult B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (Turtle, ASCO 2016), we are conducting a multicenter phase 1 trial of JCAR017 in R/R diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02631044). JCAR017 is a second-generation, CD19-directed CAR-T cell product of defined cellular composition consisting of a 1:1 ratio of CD8+:CD4+ CAR+ T cells. Methods: Patients with R/R DLBCL (de novo or transformed from indolent lymphoma), follicular lymphoma grade 3B, or MCL and adequate organ function are eligible. There was no minimum absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) requirement for apheresis and no test expansion required. Treatment includes lymphodepletion (fludarabine 30 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 300 mg/m2 daily for 3 days) and JCAR017 given 2-7 days post-lymphodepletion at a starting dose of 5 x 107 CAR+ T cells (DL1). Single-dose and two-dose schedules are being evaluated. Primary objectives include safety and pharmacokinetics (PK) of JCAR017 measured by flow cytometry and quantitative PCR. Secondary objectives include complete and overall response (CR, OR) rates and duration of response (DOR). Response is assessed using the Lugano (2014) criteria. Results: As of August 1, 2016, 39 patients have been enrolled and 28 patients apheresed. Fourteen patients have been treated, all at DL1. Eight were male and 6 female. Thirteen patients had DLBCL and 1 had MCL. Median age was 61 years (range 37-79) and median number of prior therapies was 5 (range 2-9). Ten patients had undergone prior transplant (7 autologous; 3 allogeneic). Of the 14 patients, there were no cases of severe cytokine release syndrome (sCRS); 3 patients had low grade CRS (21%) (2 grade 1; 1 grade 2) and none required treatment with tocilizumab. Two of the 14 treated patients (14%) had neurotoxicity: 1 grade 4 encephalopathy and 1 grade 4 seizure. Both were in patients with DLBCL and were dose-limiting toxicities. Two deaths were seen in the DLBCL group and were due to disease progression. Twelve patients had at least 1 post-treatment response assessment; 11 patients with DLBCL and 1 with MCL. The patient with MCL had progressive disease at day 29 (D29). In the DLBCL group, response rates were: 82% (9/11) OR, 73% (8/11) CR, 9% (1/11) PR and 18% (2/11) PD at the time of post-treatment assessment on D29. All but one patient who achieved a CR were in remission at the time of this data cut. One DLBCL patient in CR had a parenchymal brain lesion in the right temporal lobe that also completely resolved. Of note, this patient had no CRS or neurotoxicity associated with JCAR017 treatment. The PK profile of JCAR017 in the peripheral blood and bone marrow show cellular expansion in all patients with persistence out to at least 3 months in patients with adequate follow up. Exploratory biomarker analyses will be presented at the meeting along with updated clinical data. Conclusions: Treatment with the defined cellular composition product JCAR017 following lymphodepletion with fludarabine and cyclophosphamide results in high CR rates in patients with heavily pretreated DLBCL, including the first report of a CR in a patient with secondary CNS lymphoma. Observed toxicities are manageable and compare favorably to other reported CAR T-cell products. Disclosures Abramson: Gilead: Consultancy; Kite Pharma: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy. Gordon:Northwestern University: Patents & Royalties: Patent for gold nanoparticles pending. Lunning:Celgene: Consultancy; Bristol-Myer-Squibb: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy; Genentech: Consultancy; Juno: Consultancy; AbbVie: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy; TG Therapeutics: Consultancy; Spectrum: Consultancy. Arnason:Gilead: Consultancy. Forero-Torres:Genentech/Roche: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Juno: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding. Albertson:Juno Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Sutherland:Juno therapeutics: Employment. Xie:Juno Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Snodgrass:Juno therapeutics: Employment. Siddiqi:Pharmacyclics, LLC, an AbbVie Company: Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Speakers Bureau; Seattle Genetics: Speakers Bureau; Kite pharma: Other: Funded travel, 1 day registration, and 1 night hotel stay for EHA2016 so I could present trial data there.

scholarly journals CAR T Cell Therapy Targeting G Protein-Coupled Receptor Class C Group 5 Member D (GPRC5D), a Novel Target for the Immunotherapy of Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 589-589 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric L. Smith ◽  
Kimberly Harrington ◽  
Mette Staehr ◽  
Reed Masakayan ◽  
Jon Jones ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
T Cells ◽  
T Cell ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Car T Cells ◽  
Car T Cell ◽  
Car T ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
G Protein Coupled

Abstract Early clinical results using BCMA targeted CAR T cell therapies for advanced multiple myeloma (MM) have shown promise. However, BCMA expression can be variable, and BCMA downregulation has been correlated with relapse (Brudno J. JCO. 2018; Cohen A. ASH. 2017). Targeting multiple antigens may enhance response durability. We report that the orphan seven transmembrane G protein coupled receptor, GPRC5D, is an attractive additional target for CAR T cell therapy of MM. GPRC5D mRNA expression was previously identified in bone marrow cells from patients with MM; however its protein expression could not be detected with available FACS reagents (Frigyesi I. Blood. 2014). We evaluated 83 primary marrow samples by quantitative immunofluorescence (Q-IF) for CD138, BCMA, and GPRC5D. In 98% of the samples, CD138+ cells expressed surface GPRC5D. In most samples, the majority of CD138+ cells expressed both BCMA and GPRC5D, however, in several cases the dominant CD138+ population expressed only BCMA or GPRC5D, with GPRC5D expression independent of BCMA across samples (R2=0.156; Figure 1). The potential for "on target/off tumor" binding by targeting GPRC5D was evaluated by screening 30 essential normal tissue types by IHC (n=3 donors/type) followed by validation of any positive findings by RNA in situ hybridization and quantitative PCR. Results in non-plasma cell normal tissue were consistent with prior reports of GPRC5D off target expression restricted to cells from the hair follicle, a potentially immune privileged site. We developed GPRC5D-targeted CARs considering immunogenicity, spacer length, and tonic signaling. To minimize potential anti-CAR immunity, a human B cell-derived phage display library was screened. Seven diverse and highly specific human single chain variable fragments (scFvs) were identified. 42 CARs were derived from the 7 scFvs by modifying scFv orientation (VH/VL; VL/VH) and incorporating a short, medium, or long IgG4 based spacer. To monitor CAR-mediated signaling, we transduced each CAR into a Jurkat reporter line with RFP inserted in-frame, downstream of endogenous NR4A1 (Nur77). Nur77 expression is an immediate-early, specific marker of CD3z signaling (Ashouri J. J Immunol. 2017). Using this reporter, we observed that (1) a long spacer provided enhanced antigen-dependent activation across all anti-GPRC5D CARs; and (2) the use of different scFvs resulted in vastly different levels of tonic signaling. We selected potential lead and backup constructs and evaluated CAR activity on primary human T cells. When co-cultured specifically with MM cell lines, anti-GPRC5D CAR T cells secreted a polyfunctional cytokine profile, proliferated, and effectively lysed target cells. CD138+/CD38hi primary MM bone marrow aspirate cells were also specifically lysed. In vivo efficacy of GPRC5D-targeted CAR T cells was evaluated in NSG mice engrafted with a human MM cell line (ffLuc+) bone marrow xenograft. Donor T cells were gene-modified to express anti-GPRC5D CARs with either a 4-1BB or a CD28 co-stimulatory domain and membrane-anchored Gaussia luciferase (GLuc). Compared to control CAR T cells specific for an irrelevant target, anti-GPRC5D CAR T cells with either co-stimulatory domain proliferated and homed to the site of MM (Gluc imaging), eradicated MM xenograft (ffLuc imaging), and increased survival (Figure 2). One scFv that was highly functional in our GPRC5D CAR screen was evaluated for off-target binding against either >200 G protein-coupled receptors (cell based), or >4000 human transmembrane proteins (scFv-Fc based), and demonstrated binding only to GPRC5D. Studies with murine and cynomolgus cross-reactive GPRC5D targeting CARs did not show signs of alopecia or other unexpected toxicity in either species. In a murine model of post-BCMA CAR T cell treated antigen escape (CRISPR BCMA KO of a subpopulation of MM cells), anti-GPRC5D CAR T cells rescue BCMA- relapse. These results indicate that GPRC5D will be an important target for the immunotherapy of MM. We are translating this 4-1BB-containing, human-derived, GPRC5D-targeted CAR construct to the clinic. Disclosures Smith: Celgene: Consultancy, Patents & Royalties: CAR T cell therapies for MM, Research Funding. Harrington:Juno Therapeutics, a Celgene Company: Employment, Equity Ownership. Masakayan:Agentus Inc: Employment. Jones:Juno Therapeutics, a Celgene Company: Employment, Equity Ownership. Long:Juno Therapeutics, a Celgene Company: Employment, Equity Ownership. Ghoddusi:Juno Therapeutics, a Celgene Company: Employment, Equity Ownership. Do:Juno Therapeutics, a Celgene Company: Employment, Equity Ownership. Pham:Juno Therapeutics, a Celgene Company: Employment, Equity Ownership. Wang:Eureka Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Liu:Eureka Therapeutics, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Xu:Eureka Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Riviere:Juno Therapeutics, a Celgene Company: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Fate Therapeutics Inc.: Research Funding. Liu:Eureka Therapeutics, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Sather:Juno Therapeutics, a Celgene Company: Employment, Equity Ownership. Brentjens:Juno Therapeutics, a Celgene Company: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding.

scholarly journals Safety and Anti-Tumor Activity of CD5 CAR T-Cells in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory T-Cell Malignancies

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 199-199 ◽  
Author(s):  
LaQuisa C. Hill ◽  
Rayne H. Rouce ◽  
Tyler S. Smith ◽  
Lina Yang ◽  
Madhuwanti Srinivasan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cells ◽  
T Cell ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Car T Cells ◽  
Car T Cell ◽  
Car T ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
T Cell Malignancies

Introduction: We describe a Phase I dose escalation study (NCT03081910) of autologous CD5-directed chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CD5 CAR T) therapy for relapsed or refractory (r/r) T-cell leukemia and lymphoma. Establishing a CAR T cell platform to target neoplasms of T-cell origin has been hindered by the shared expression of most targetable antigens on both malignant and normal T lymphocytes, which can promote CAR T cell fratricide. CD5 is one such pan-T cell surface marker present in ~85% of T-cell malignancies. We developed a second-generation CD5-specific CAR with CD28 costimulatory endodomain that produces minimal and transient fratricide when expressed in T cells. We designed this study to evaluate the safety and feasibility of treating patients with r/r T-cell malignancies with these CD5 CAR T cells as a bridge to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT). Secondary objectives of our study included evaluating the antitumor response, in vivo expansion, persistence of CD5 CAR T cells, as well as their impact on normal T-cell numbers and function. Patients and methods: CD5 CAR T cells were generated from autologous PBMCs using gammaretroviral transduction and cryopreserved. We detected no residual malignant cells in the CD5 CAR T cell products by flow cytometry. To date, we have treated a total of 9 patients (8 adults and 1 adolescent; age 16-71 years [median 62 yrs]) with CD5+ r/r T-acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL; n=4) or T-non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (T-NHL; n=5) on dose levels 1 and 2. All patients were transplant-eligible with an identified allogeneic HSCT donor, yet unable to proceed due to residual disease. All patients had been heavily pretreated, with a median of 5 (range 2 -18) prior lines of therapy. Two patients had previously failed allogeneic HSCT. Patients received cytoreductive chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide and fludarabine followed by a single dose of CD5 CAR T cells. We evaluated adverse events, clinical responses, and in vivo expansion and persistence pre and post-infusion. Results: Three patients received CD5 CAR T cells on dose level 1 (1x107 CAR T cells/m2) and 6 on dose level 2 (5x107 CAR T cells/m2). In all patients treated, CAR T cells reached peak expansion in peripheral blood (PB) 1-4 weeks following infusion, followed by a gradual contraction in most patients (Figure 1). CD5 CAR T cells were present in lymph node and marrow biopsies in patients with T-NHL and T-ALL, respectively, and were also detected in a CSF sample in 1 T-ALL patient. After cytoreduction and CAR T cell infusion, we observed decreased PB CD3+ cell numbers but this ablation was never complete. Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) occurred in 3/9 patients (all at dose level 2). Grade 1 CRS was observed in 2 patients. One patient experienced Grade 2 CRS and Grade 2 neurotoxicity, which resolved after administration of tocilizumab and supportive care, respectively. Two patients had prolonged cytopenias at 6 weeks, 1 of whom had viral reactivation (CMV and BK virus) requiring antiviral therapy. On disease re-evaluation 4-8 weeks post-CD5 CAR T cell infusion, 4 of 9 evaluable patients obtained an objective response (1 of 3 on DL1 and 3 of 6 on DL2). Complete responses (CR) were achieved in 3 patients, one with angioimmunoblastic T cell lymphoma (AITL), one with peripheral T cell lymphoma (PTCL), and one with T-ALL. Two of these patients did not wish or were unable to proceed to planned HSCT and relapsed with their underlying CD5+ malignancy at 6 weeks and 7 months post-infusion. The remaining patient is currently undergoing work-up for HSCT (Figure 2). An additional patient with extensive AITL was classified as a mixed response (Figure 3) due to the appearance of a new PET-avid lesion. This patient received a second infusion of CD5-CAR T cells, proceeded to HSCT, and remains in CR at 125 days post-transplant. Conclusions: These results demonstrate that CD5 CAR T cells are safe and can induce clinical responses in heavily treated patients with r/r CD5+ T-ALL and T-NHL without inducing complete T-cell aplasia. Importantly, elimination of malignant T cells by CD5 CAR T cells may allow previously ineligible patients to proceed to HSCT. Disclosures Rouce: Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Tessa Therapeutics: Research Funding; Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy, Honoraria. Grilley:Allovir: Consultancy, Equity Ownership; Marker Therapeutics: Consultancy; Tessa: Consultancy. Heslop:Marker Therapeutics: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Allovir: Equity Ownership; Gilead Biosciences: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kiadis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Tessa Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Cell Medica: Research Funding. Brenner:Allovir: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Marker Therapeutics: Equity Ownership; T Scan: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Tessa Therapeutics: Equity Ownership; Memgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Allogene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

scholarly journals Potent Synergy between Combination of Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) Therapy Targeting CD19 in Conjunction with Dendritic Cell (DC)/Tumor Fusion Vaccine in Hematological Malignancies

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 3227-3227
Author(s):  
Marzia Capelletti ◽  
Jessica Liegel ◽  
Maria Themeli ◽  
Tuna Mutis ◽  
Dina Stroopinsky ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cells ◽  
T Cell ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Advisory Board ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Car T Cells ◽  
Car T Cell ◽  
Car T ◽  
Equity Ownership

Introduction: CAR T cells have demonstrated unique potency for tumor cytoreduction and the potential for durable response in patients with advanced hematological malignancies. However, disease relapse remains a significant concern due to the emergence of antigen negative variants, tolerization of CAR T cell populations and lack of T cell persistence. We have developed a personalized cancer vaccine in which patient derived tumor cells are fused with autologous dendritic cells such that a broad array of tumor antigens is expressed in the context of DC mediated co-stimulation. Vaccination of patients with acute leukemia and multiple myeloma has been associated with the durable expansion of tumor specific lymphocytes in the bone marrow and peripheral blood, targeting of residual disease, and durable remission. We postulated that vaccination with DC/tumor fusions would enhance CAR T cell efficacy through the expansion of T cell clonal populations targeting tumor cells via the native TCR and the vaccine mediated enhancement of T cell activation and persistence. In addition, ex vivo engineered CAR T cells provide a substrate of functionally competent T cells with cytoreductive capacity in the setting of advanced disease. In the present study, we examined the potential synergy between CAR T cells targeting CD19 and syngeneic DC/tumor fusions. Methods/Results: CAR T cells and DC/tumor fusions were studied in the context of a murine A20 lymphoma model. CD19 CAR T cells were established through retroviral transduction of a CD19 CAR construct expressing CD28 and 41BBL syngeneic DC/A20 fusions were generated as previously described. Vaccine stimulated T cells were generated by coculturing splenocyte derived T cells with syngeneic DC/A20 fusion cells over a period of three days in a 10:1 ratio in the presence of low dose IL2. While CD19 CAR T cells effectively lysed a subset of A20 cells in a CTL, the addition of vaccine educated T cells increased the percentage of tumor cells undergoing CTL mediated lysis (20% vs 34%). We subsequently examined the interaction of vaccine and CAR T cells ex vivo using the IncuCyte S3 Live-Cell Analysis System which allows for live cell visualization of lysis of A20 cells over time. We studied the impact of combining vaccine educated and CAR T cells as well as an individual T cell population that underwent sequential vaccine mediated stimulation followed by transduction with the CD19 CAR. While vaccine educated and CAR T cells demonstrated potent lysis of A20 cells over time, coculture with either combined vaccine educated and CAR T cells or sequentially vaccine educated and transduced T cells demonstrated the highest levels of cytotoxicity that was maintained over time (1786 and 2338 signal overlap count per image at 23 hours compared to 123 of the control). Enhanced lysis by combined vaccine stimulation and CAR T cells was similarly demonstrated in another tumor cell line, 5TGM1, a multiple myeloma cell line transduced to express CD19. Cytotoxic killing of the 5TGM1-CD19 cells was most pronounced when combining vaccine educated and CAR T cells as compared to CAR T cells alone (33% vs 14%). Consistent with the broad targeting of vaccine educated as compared to the CAR T cell population, wild type 5TGM1 cells were recognized by the DC/tumor fusion stimulated cells in contrast to CAR T cells alone (40% vs. 8%). We subsequently examined the capacity of vaccine educated T cells in conjunction with CAR T cells to target A20 cells in an immunocompetent murine model. Mice were challenged with 1 x 10(6) A20 Mcherry-Luc and lymphoma engraftment was demonstrated at Day 7. Animals were then treated with 3 x 10(6) T cells consisting of CAR T cells, vaccine educated T cells or the combination. Serial bioluminescence imaging demonstrated greatest reduction in tumor burden using combined CAR T and vaccine educated T cells with 4/5 animals without BLI evidence of disease at day 13 after tumor challenge. Conclusions: In in vitro and immunocompetent murine models, we have demonstrated that combined therapy with T cells stimulated by DC/tumor fusions and CAR T cells exhibited potent lysis of murine lymphoma and myeloma cells as compared to the efficacy of CAR T cells or vaccine educated T cells alone. These findings suggest potent synergy between these modalities that may overcome recognized pathways of resistance including the broadening of the tumor specific response and vaccine mediated activation of CAR T cell populations. Disclosures Themeli: Covagen: Consultancy. Mutis:Janssen Research and Development: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Onkimmune: Research Funding; Genmab: Research Funding. Munshi:Adaptive: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Oncopep: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy. Kufe:Genus Oncology: Equity Ownership; Reata Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Equity Ownership, Honoraria; Nanogen Therapeutics: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Hillstream BioPharma: Equity Ownership; Victa BioTherapeutics: Consultancy, Equity Ownership, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Canbas: Consultancy, Honoraria. Rosenblatt:BMS: Research Funding; Amgen: Other: Advisory Board; Merck: Other: Advisory Board; BMS: Other: Advisory Board ; Parexel: Consultancy; Imaging Endpoint: Consultancy; Partner Tx: Other: Advisory Board; Dava Oncology: Other: Education; Celgene: Research Funding. Sadelain:Fate Therapeutics: Consultancy, Patents & Royalties; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center: Employment; Juno Therapeutics: Consultancy, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding. Avigan:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Juno: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Partners Tx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Partner Tx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Karyopharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Consultancy; Parexel: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy.

scholarly journals PD-1 Inhibitor Combinations As Salvage Therapy for Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma (MM) Patients Progressing after Bcma-Directed CAR T Cells

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1973-1973 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luca Bernabei ◽  
Alfred L. Garfall ◽  
J. Joseph Melenhorst ◽  
Simon F Lacey ◽  
Edward A. Stadtmauer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cells ◽  
T Cell ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Car T Cells ◽  
Car T Cell ◽  
Hla Dr ◽  
Car T ◽  
Equity Ownership

Abstract Background: Autologous T cells expressing a chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) specific for B-cell maturation antigen (CART-BCMA cells) show activity in refractory MM, but relapses remain common. Anti-PD-1 antibodies (Abs) augment CAR T cell activity pre-clinically, and induced CAR T cell re-expansion and responses in DLBCL patients progressing after CD19-specific CAR T cells (Chong et al, Blood 2017). The IMiDs lenalidomide (len) and pomalidomide (pom) may enhance efficacy, but also toxicity, of both CAR T cells and PD-1 inhibitors in MM. Elotuzumab (elo) has clinical anti-MM activity in combination with IMiDs and dexamethasone (dex), and synergizes with anti-PD-1 Ab in pre-clinical models. Methods: We previously described outcomes of 25 subjects enrolled on our phase 1 study of CART-BCMA cells in relapsed/refractory MM (Cohen et al, ASH 2017, #505). We identified and retrospectively reviewed 5 subjects who progressed after CART-BCMA and received a PD-1 inhibitor (pembrolizumab (pembro)) combination as their next therapy. Responses were assessed by IMWG criteria. CART-BCMA levels were assessed by flow cytometry and qPCR pre-treatment, 2-4 weeks after first pembro dose, then q4 weeks until progression. Pembro dosing was 200mg every 3 weeks; dex dosing was 20-40mg/week. Results: Characteristics of the 5 subjects are in the Table. Median prior lines was 9; all had high-risk cytogenetics. All were refractory to pom, 2 to pembro/pom/dex, and 1 to elo. Best response to CART-BCMA was PR in 2, MR in 2, and PD in 1. Median time from CART-BCMA to pembro-based therapy was 117 days. All patients still had CART-BCMA cells detectable by qPCR, with 2 (pts. 07 and 21) still detectable by flow, at initiation of salvage therapy. The first pt. (02) received pembro/pom/dex and had MR but progressed at 2 months, with no detectable CART-BCMA re-expansion. The second pt. (07) had rapidly-progressing kappa light chain MM 2 months post-CART-BCMA and had previously progressed on pembro/pom/dex. He started elo/pembro/pom/dex and had MR at day 12 (free kappa 1446 to 937 mg/L), associated with robust expansion of CART-BCMA cells (875.64 to 20505.07 copies/µg DNA by qPCR; 0.7% to 6.4% of peripheral CD3+ cells by flow). Re-expanded CART-BCMA cells were predominantly CD8+ and highly activated (89% HLA-DR+, up from 18% pre-therapy). This response was short-lived, however, with progression 1 week later, and return of CART-BCMA levels to baseline at week 5. Three subsequent subjects then received elo/pembro/dex with either len or pom; with 2 MR and 1 SD, and PFS of 3 to 4 months. None had re-expansion of CART-BCMA cells. Non-specific immune modulation was observed and included altered CD4:CD8 T cell ratio (n=5), increased NK cell/decreased T cell frequency (n=4), and HLA-DR upregulation on CAR-negative T cells (n=2). More detailed phenotyping of CART and other immune cells, including PD-1 expression, is ongoing. With regard to toxicity, pt. 02 had self-limiting low-grade fevers and myalgias 4 weeks after pembro/pom/dex, associated with mild elevation in ferritin/CRP, suggestive of mild CRS. No other CRS was noted, including pt. 07 despite CART-BCMA re-expansion. One patient (17) developed recurrent expressive aphasia starting 2 months after elo/pembro/pom/dex, without signs of CRS and no observed expansion of CART-BCMA cells in blood or CSF. This resolved with stopping therapy and brief steroid taper. Conclusions: This study demonstrates that a PD1-inhibitor combination can induce CAR T cell re-expansion and anti-MM response in a MM patient progressing after CART-BCMA therapy. Since this patient previously progressed on pembro/pom/dex, the observed clinical activity was likely related to the CAR T cells, with elotuzumab also possibly contributing. However, this effect was very transient; re-expansion occurred infrequently (1/5 patients); and neurotoxicity was observed (though its relationship to the CAR T cells is unclear). This makes it difficult to endorse this specific salvage regimen. Nonetheless, this proof-of-principle observation suggests that a subset of patients may respond to checkpoint blockade or other immune-modulating approaches following BCMA CAR T cell therapy, meriting further study. Table. Table. Disclosures Garfall: Kite Pharma: Consultancy; Novartis: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Bioinvent: Research Funding. Melenhorst:novartis: Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Shanghai UNICAR Therapy, Inc: Consultancy; Casi Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Parker Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy: Research Funding. Lacey:Parker Foundation: Research Funding; Tmunity: Research Funding; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Patents & Royalties; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Research Funding. Stadtmauer:Janssen: Consultancy; AbbVie, Inc: Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy. Vogl:Karyopharm Therapeutics: Consultancy. Plesa:Novartis: Research Funding. Young:Novartis: Patents & Royalties, Research Funding. Levine:Novartis: Consultancy, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Tmunity Therapeutics: Equity Ownership, Research Funding; Incysus: Consultancy; Cure Genetics: Consultancy; CRC Oncology: Consultancy; Brammer Bio: Consultancy. June:Immune Design: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Immune Design: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Tmunity Therapeutics: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Celldex: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Tmunity Therapeutics: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Novartis Pharmaceutical Corporation: Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Novartis Pharmaceutical Corporation: Patents & Royalties, Research Funding. Milone:Novartis: Patents & Royalties. Cohen:Bristol Meyers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy; Novartis: Research Funding; Poseida Therapeutics, Inc.: Research Funding; Kite Pharma: Consultancy; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Oncopeptides: Consultancy.

Phase 1 Biomarker Analysis of the ZUMA-1 (KTE-C19-101) Study: A Phase 1-2 Multi-Center Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Anti-CD19 CAR T Cells (KTE-C19) in Subjects with Refractory Aggressive Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (NHL)

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 2730-2730 ◽  
Author(s):  
John M. Rossi ◽  
Sattva S. Neelapu ◽  
William Y. Go ◽  
Yueh-wei Shen ◽  
Marika Sherman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cells ◽  
T Cell ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Multiparameter Flow Cytometry ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Car T Cells ◽  
Car T Cell ◽  
Biomarker Analysis ◽  
Car T ◽  
Equity Ownership

Abstract Introduction: A single institution study conducted at the National Cancer Institute (NCI) using anti-CD19 CAR T cells with CD28 and CD3-zeta signaling domains showed durable remissions in subjects with relapsed/refractory advanced B-cell malignancies (Kochenderfer et al. Blood 2012, JCO 2014, ASH 2014). In the NCI study, anti-CD19 CAR T cells expanded within 1 week of administration and generally cleared the peripheral blood within 2 months. Anti-CD19 CAR T cell infusion resulted in rapid elevation and subsequent resolution of circulating cytokines and chemokines within 3 weeks (Bot et al. ASCO 2015). KTE-C19 utilizes the same anti-CD19 CAR construct investigated at the NCI, manufactured using an optimized 6-8 day process (Better et al. ASCO 2014). Preliminary characterization of KTE-C19 expansion and serum pharmacodynamic (PD) markers from ZUMA-1 are presented. Methods: Subjects received KTE-C19 at a target dose of 2 x 106 (1 x 106 minimum) CAR-positive T cells/kg body weight after undergoing a fixed dose conditioning chemotherapy regimen of cyclophosphamide and fludarabine. KTE-C19 was characterized pre- and post-infusion by multiparameter flow cytometry for CAR expression and major phenotypic markers. KTE-C19 expansion and clearance was also monitored by multiparameter flow cytometry and quantitative PCR (qPCR) at weeks 1, 2, 4 and months 3 and 6 respectively. Forty one analytes from serum samples were evaluated by EMD Millipore Luminex® xMAP® multiplex assays at Days -5 (prior to conditioning chemotherapy), 0, 1, 3, 5, 7, 14 and 28 for a broad panel of cytokines, chemokines and immune effector related markers. Maximum fold increase (MFI) was defined as the maximum fold change of measured analytes above baseline (Day -5). Time to maximum value and time to resolution were calculated among subjects with increases after commencement of conditioning chemotherapy. Comparisons of fold increase were not adjusted for multiplicity. Results: As of 28 July 2015, 6 subjects have received KTE-C19. Three subjects had post-infusion samples evaluable for CAR T-cell expansion by qPCR. Peak levels occurred within 7 days and KTE-C19 was detectable at 1 month. Additional qPCR monitoring is ongoing. Circulating cytokines, chemokines and immune effector markers have been evaluated in 4 subjects. Samples post conditioning and pre-KTE-C19 infusion showed significant increases in the levels of IL-15 (p<0.005) and MCP-1 (p<0.030). Cytokine and chemokine levels achieved their peak levels 1-10 days post KTE-C19 infusion and returned to baseline generally within 3 weeks. Key pro-inflammatory markers were substantially upregulated as indicated in the table. Additional monitoring of KTE-C19 persistence (by qPCR), phenotype and activation status of CAR T cells is ongoing. Updated results will be presented. Pre-infusion characterization of KTE-C19 with respect to CAR expression and T-cell subsets including CD4, CD8, naïve, central memory and effector memory are presented in a separate ASH abstract. Conclusion: Six subjects with refractory aggressive NHL have received KTE-C19. CAR T cells expanded substantially and persisted through at least 1 month in 3 subjects evaluated to date. Pro-inflammatory, immune-homeostatic cytokines and chemokines peaked within 2 weeks. Timing of peak KTE-C19 expansion and serum cytokine profiles and clearance in this multicenter study with an optimized, shortened manufacturing process were consistent with results of the NCI study. This first biomarker analysis of ZUMA-1 demonstrates the PD activity of KTE-C19 and will help optimize future CAR T cell therapy. Clinical trial: NCT02348216.Table 1.MFI (range)Time to Maximum Median Days (range)Time to ResolutionaMedian Days (range)IL-6141 (17, 1010)5 (3, 9)18.5 (9, 28)IFN-gamma167 (8, 4387)4 (3, 5)9 (7, 10)CRP27 (1, 57)5 (3, 5)7 (7, 13)IL-1522 (12, 55)2 (1, 7)9 (9, 9)IL-27 (1, 31)1 (1, 3)5 (3, 5)IL-10132 (3, 561)5 (5, 5)9 (7, 11)MCP-116 (2, 25)2 (1, 5)7 (3, 10)Granzyme B42 (27, 773)5 (5, 7)8.5 (7, 14)a Time to resolution is the first post-KTE-C19 infusion day at which the level was ≤ 2x baseline. Disclosures Rossi: Kite Pharma: Employment, Equity Ownership; Amgen: Equity Ownership. Off Label Use: Tocilizumab for the management of CRS . Go:Kite Pharma: Employment, Equity Ownership; Amgen: Equity Ownership. Shen:Kite Pharma: Employment, Equity Ownership. Sherman:Amgen: Equity Ownership; Kite Pharma: Employment, Equity Ownership. Locke:Kite Pharma: Other: Scientific Advisory Boards. Bartlett:Insight: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Kite: Research Funding; Medimmune: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Colgene: Research Funding; Millennium: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Gilead: Consultancy, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; MERC: Research Funding; Dynavax: Research Funding; Idera: Research Funding; Portola: Research Funding; Bristol Meyers Squibb: Research Funding; Infinity: Research Funding; LAM Theapeutics: Research Funding. Siddiqi:Pharmacyclics/Jannsen: Speakers Bureau; Seattle Genetics: Speakers Bureau; Kite pharma: Other: attended advisory board meeting. Navale:Amgen: Equity Ownership; Kite Pharma: Employment, Equity Ownership. Elias:Kite Pharma: Employment, Equity Ownership; Amgen: Equity Ownership. Wiezorek:Kite Pharma: Employment, Equity Ownership, Other: Officer of Kite Pharma. Bot:Kite Pharma: Employment, Equity Ownership.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document